Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Cybersecurity is so hard, that they are literally making a documentary about how horrible the job of a CISO is. Then we set SDRs and AEs to "go high within the organization" in order to shill products that don't work. And people wonder why cybersec quota attainment is low.

35,940 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von The Deal Director
The Deal Directorvor 1 Jahr

Time to sell AI folks:

Profilbild von SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple
SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simplevor 1 Jahr

🎓 Preparing for certifications like Security+, CISSP, CEH, or CISM? Why Just Pass When You Can Master Cybersecurity?💡 Our 50 study tips + Cybersecurity Dictionary for Everyone make you exam-ready & industry-prepared! 🔑 Available on Amazon:

Profilbild von Mike Simmons #leadership
Mike Simmons #leadershipvor 1 Jahr

Let’s create more noise. That always works. 😅 This is an awesome space to work in. Challenge is that vendors still focus on self rather than the customer. Imagine if they too some of the behavioral science stuff, and applied it to outreach in context. 🤔

Profilbild von Full Degen
Full Degenvor 1 Jahr

So you don’t recommend to do sales in cybersec?

Profilbild von The Deal Director
The Deal Directorvor 1 Jahr

I recommend to join a company with a strong platform play. I've written a lot of articles around cybersec you can read, but this intro to Palo Alto explains the core thesis:

Profilbild von Lee Corning
Lee Corningvor 1 Jahr

truth. learned by experience.

Profilbild von The Deal Director
The Deal Directorvor 1 Jahr

burned* by experience

Profilbild von Beachside Closer
Beachside Closervor 1 Jahr

It’s not for the weak

Profilbild von Mwesh
Mweshvor 1 Jahr

I am sat 🍿

Profilbild von Mr. Pink
Mr. Pinkvor 1 Jahr

Trying to figure out if this is real or satire...😂 😂 😂

Ähnliche Videos

Shuler: If you think about every industrial revolution we’ve been through, working people have helped us make that transition. It’s really because we’ve helped tame the technology and figured out how to use it in the most effective way. So I think your question about augmentation versus replacement is the big question we have. If we can all agree that this is about making our jobs better, safer, easier, and more productive, then we’re all in. But if you’re looking to de-skill, dehumanize, and replace workers, to put people out on the street with no path forward, then absolutely you’re going to have a revolution. So I think that’s something we all need to be very real about and think seriously about. If we’re going to have productivity gains, working people—the ones who make these industries happen—need to share in that. There hasn’t been a lot of discussion about that here. Of course, in terms of how we create policies, how we create tax infrastructure, whether or not we are redistributing—yes, that word is a dirty word around here—we need to talk about it and confront how we’re going to make sure working people share in the gains of these technologies. And if you look at the numbers of jobs, let’s talk about job quality. Yes, maybe there are a lot of jobs created, but what kind of jobs are we talking about? Are they jobs that can sustain a family? Is it a job where people can actually work one job? One job should be enough.

Acyn

41,942 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten