Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

CZ's 3 Tips for Beginners: Risk Control Is As Important As Making Money On January 14, 2026, Binance Founder CZ shared 3 core tips for crypto newcomers: First, prioritize learning, recommending Binance Academy; second, start small, advising to allocate just 1% of funds to get familiar with wallets and... show more

Wu Blockchain

556,794 subscribers

16,164 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount of money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved ____ milestones and eliminated ____ risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve ____ milestones and eliminate ____ risks. This will get the company to ____ state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land. Follow Startup Archive for more tactical startup advice!

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount of money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved milestones and eliminated risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve milestones and eliminate risks. This will get the company to state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land. Follow Startup Archive for more tactical startup advice!

Startup Archive

178,597 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved ____ milestones and eliminated ____ risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve ____ milestones and eliminate ____ risks. This will get the company to ____ state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land.

Q: Should startups always raise as much money as possible? In the clip below, Marc Andreessen shares a framework that Benchmark co-founder Andy Rachleff taught him called "The Onion Theory of Risk". You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved milestones and eliminated risks. Now I'm going to raise $X for the Series A to achieve milestones and eliminate risks. This will get the company to state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land.

Michael McGuiness

735,645 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Marc Andreessen explains the “Onion Theory of Risk” “I think the single-biggest thing entrepreneurs are missing — both on fundraising and how they run their companies — is the relationship between risk and cash. I’ve always been a fan of something Andy Rachleff taught me years ago. He calls it the ‘Onion Theory of Risk.’” You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved ____ milestones and eliminated ____ risks. Now I'm going to raise $ X for the Series A to achieve ____ milestones and eliminate ____ risks. This will get the company to ____ state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land. Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Marc Andreessen explains the “Onion Theory of Risk” “I think the single-biggest thing entrepreneurs are missing — both on fundraising and how they run their companies — is the relationship between risk and cash. I’ve always been a fan of something Andy Rachleff taught me years ago. He calls it the ‘Onion Theory of Risk.’” You can think of a day 1 startup as having every conceivable kind of risk: founding team risk, product risk, technical risk, market acceptance risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk, viral growth risk, etc. A startup is basically just a long list of risks, and as Marc explains: "The way I think about running a startup is the way I think about raising money. It's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go." You raise seed money to peel away the first two or three risks (e.g. founding team risk, product risk, initial launch risk). You raise the Series A round to peel away the next layer of risks (e.g. recruiting risk, customer risk, revenue risk, cost of sales risk) And so on. Basically, you're peeling away risk as you're achieving milestones. And as you achieve milestones, you're both: making progress on your business and justifying raising more capital. So in terms of fundraising, you should be calibrating the amount money you're raising to the risks you need to pull out of your business for you to raise your next round. For example, if you're raising your Series A round, the best way to do that is to say to investors: "I raised a seed round then achieved milestones and eliminated risks. Now I'm going to raise $ X for the Series A to achieve milestones and eliminate risks. This will get the company to state for the Series B round. " This seems fairly obvious, but as Marc points out, it's a much more systematic way of going about things versus just raising as much money as possible, renting fancy offices, and hiring as many people as you can to grow as fast as you can. The more money you raise, the more you dilute your ownership stake in your business so it pays to be thoughtful. Raise the capital you will need to achieve the milestones and eliminate the risks required for your next financing round. It also probably makes sense to give yourself some margin as safety because things never go exactly as planned in startup land. Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Startup Archive

63,274 просмотров • 1 год назад

CZ Responds to What's His Biggest Life Wish On December 3, during Binance Blockchain Week, Binance Founder CZ was asked about "five things he wants to achieve before he dies" in a group media interview. He stated that one wish is enough, admitting he has no excessive demands. CZ believes the joy of life lies in its uncertainty—just as a game with a known outcome is far less interesting than the process that requires striving, caution, and collaboration. Challenges in life, he noted, are themselves part of the fun. He emphasized his biggest life wish: for everyone to have good health. Even with healthy living habits, he added, health remains an important aspect that people cannot fully control. Video Source: Binance Blockchain Week 2025

CZ Responds to What's His Biggest Life Wish On December 3, during Binance Blockchain Week, Binance Founder CZ was asked about "five things he wants to achieve before he dies" in a group media interview. He stated that one wish is enough, admitting he has no excessive demands. CZ believes the joy of life lies in its uncertainty—just as a game with a known outcome is far less interesting than the process that requires striving, caution, and collaboration. Challenges in life, he noted, are themselves part of the fun. He emphasized his biggest life wish: for everyone to have good health. Even with healthy living habits, he added, health remains an important aspect that people cannot fully control. Video Source: Binance Blockchain Week 2025

Wu Blockchain

53,340 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Rich people actually don’t take risk the way people without money do. A Multimillionaire could pack $100M in Treasury Bill at 3% return per annum and go home with $3M per year - which is effectively $250,000 a month. He would be able to live comfortably on just the returns of that money. To get the same return as a poor person you’d have to take crazy risk that may wipe you out. Making money actually gets easier with the more cash you stack up.

Rich people actually don’t take risk the way people without money do. A Multimillionaire could pack $100M in Treasury Bill at 3% return per annum and go home with $3M per year - which is effectively $250,000 a month. He would be able to live comfortably on just the returns of that money. To get the same return as a poor person you’d have to take crazy risk that may wipe you out. Making money actually gets easier with the more cash you stack up.

Mr. Czar

10,769 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

It’s not the government’s money. It’s your money, and you should be allowed to keep as much of it as possible. That is why I supported no tax on Social Security, no tax on tips, and no tax on overtime. As we approach the one-year anniversary of this historic tax cut, it is now clear we delivered for real relief for working Floridians.

It’s not the government’s money. It’s your money, and you should be allowed to keep as much of it as possible. That is why I supported no tax on Social Security, no tax on tips, and no tax on overtime. As we approach the one-year anniversary of this historic tax cut, it is now clear we delivered for real relief for working Floridians.

Senator Ashley Moody

22,338 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Ray Dalio shared a strategy on how to reduce risk 5x and has already helped 1.4M people - 1 asset - 40% chance of losing money - 15-20 uncorrelated assets - only 11% And the returns don't drop, risk - 5x lower. The key word is uncorrelated. Not just more bets, but bets that don't depend on each other. Sports + politics + crypto + weather This is the only way to consistently scale your capital without the risk of one mistake wiping you out. I would listen to Ray Dalio's advice with $19B+ capital and founder of one of the biggest hedge funds in the world

Ray Dalio shared a strategy on how to reduce risk 5x and has already helped 1.4M people - 1 asset - 40% chance of losing money - 15-20 uncorrelated assets - only 11% And the returns don't drop, risk - 5x lower. The key word is uncorrelated. Not just more bets, but bets that don't depend on each other. Sports + politics + crypto + weather This is the only way to consistently scale your capital without the risk of one mistake wiping you out. I would listen to Ray Dalio's advice with $19B+ capital and founder of one of the biggest hedge funds in the world

Noisy

90,864 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The breakdown yaMseleku and MaKhumalo started when she called MaYeni delusional on national tv. Mseleku as much as he fights with MaYeni cannot allow for her to be disrespected. Only he can disrespect MaYeni. That is when he started feeling like money is making MaKhumalo pompous. That’s when he started hating the fact that she has money and fame. #UthandoNesthembu

The breakdown yaMseleku and MaKhumalo started when she called MaYeni delusional on national tv. Mseleku as much as he fights with MaYeni cannot allow for her to be disrespected. Only he can disrespect MaYeni. That is when he started feeling like money is making MaKhumalo pompous. That’s when he started hating the fact that she has money and fame. #UthandoNesthembu

zeek

73,764 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

CZ: No One in the World Is Crazy Enough to Manipulate Bitcoin On January 31, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao stated in an AMA that the October 10 market crash was triggered by a tariff announcement, not Binance system error or price manipulation. He emphasized neither he nor Binance profits from trading crypto, noting Bitcoin is a $2 trillion market and moving its price would risk hundreds of billions—"no one in their right mind would do that." He added Binance is a compliant entity regulated by ADGM, with U.S. monitors embedded, making misconduct impossible. Affected users have been fully compensated for system failures. Zhao warned no technology guarantees zero downtime and relying on perfect system operation carries significant risks. Source：

CZ: No One in the World Is Crazy Enough to Manipulate Bitcoin On January 31, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao stated in an AMA that the October 10 market crash was triggered by a tariff announcement, not Binance system error or price manipulation. He emphasized neither he nor Binance profits from trading crypto, noting Bitcoin is a $2 trillion market and moving its price would risk hundreds of billions—"no one in their right mind would do that." He added Binance is a compliant entity regulated by ADGM, with U.S. monitors embedded, making misconduct impossible. Affected users have been fully compensated for system failures. Zhao warned no technology guarantees zero downtime and relying on perfect system operation carries significant risks. Source：

Wu Blockchain

29,372 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Imagine this for a moment. Your child looks at you and asks a simple question: “How does money grow in the digital world?” CZ 🔶 BNB Binance You want to explain it, but most financial apps feel too complex, too risky, or simply not designed for children to understand. That is exactly where #Binance Junior comes in. Binance Junior is a learning app for children aged 6 to 17. It connects safely to a parent’s Binance account and helps kids understand how digital money works in a simple and guided way. There is no trading. There are no risky features. There is no pressure. There are only safe saving tools and internal transfers, all fully controlled by parents. Think of it as a digital piggy bank for the future, where money grows slowly and patience becomes part of the lesson. Parents guide every step. They choose assets, set limits, and help their children learn by observing, asking questions, and building healthy habits from an early age. Binance Junior is not about getting rich fast. It is about learning how to manage money correctly and safely, together as a family, with parents always in control.

Imagine this for a moment. Your child looks at you and asks a simple question: “How does money grow in the digital world?” CZ 🔶 BNB Binance You want to explain it, but most financial apps feel too complex, too risky, or simply not designed for children to understand. That is exactly where #Binance Junior comes in. Binance Junior is a learning app for children aged 6 to 17. It connects safely to a parent’s Binance account and helps kids understand how digital money works in a simple and guided way. There is no trading. There are no risky features. There is no pressure. There are only safe saving tools and internal transfers, all fully controlled by parents. Think of it as a digital piggy bank for the future, where money grows slowly and patience becomes part of the lesson. Parents guide every step. They choose assets, set limits, and help their children learn by observing, asking questions, and building healthy habits from an early age. Binance Junior is not about getting rich fast. It is about learning how to manage money correctly and safely, together as a family, with parents always in control.

AB 🔶

70,128 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

The Onion Theory of Risk by Marc Andreessen: "I think the single biggest thing entrepreneurs are missing, both on fundraising and how they run their companies, is the relationship between risk and cash. The relationship between risk and raising cash, and then the relationship between risk and spending cash. So I've always been a fan of something that Andy Ratcliffe taught me years ago, which he called the onion theory of risk. Um, which basically is, you can think about a startup like on day one, um, as having every conceivable kind of risk, right? And you can basically just make a list of the risks. And so you've got, you know, founding team risk. You know, do the founders, are the founders gonna be able to work together? Do you have the right founders? You're gonna have product risk. You know, can you build a product? You'll have technical risk, right? Which is maybe you need a machine learning breakthrough or something to make it work. Are you gonna be able to do that? Um, you'll have, you know, launch risk. Will the launch go well? You'll have, you know, market acceptance risk. You'll have revenue risk. A big risk you get into in a lot of businesses that have a sales force is, can you actually sell the product for enough money to actually pay for the cost of sale? So you have the cost of sale risk. If you're a consumer product, you'll have a viral growth risk. Well, you get the thing of viral growth. And so, a startup at the very beginning is basically just this long list of risks. And then the way that I always think about running a startup is also the way I think about raising money, which is it's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go. And so you raise seed money in order to peel away the first two or three risks. The founding team risk, the product risk, and maybe the initial launch risk. You raise the A round to peel away the next level of product risk. Maybe you peel away some recruiting risk because you get your full engineering team built. Maybe you peel away some customer risk because you get your first five beta customers. And so basically the way to think about it is you're peeling away risk as you go. You're peeling away risk by achieving milestones. And then as you achieve milestones, you're both making progress in your business, and you're justifying raising more capital. And so you come in, and you pitch somebody like us, and you say you're raising a B round. The best way to do that with us is you say, okay, I raised a seed round, I achieved these milestones, I eliminated these risks. I raised the A round, I achieved these milestones, and I eliminated these risks. Now I'm gonna raise a B round. Here are my milestones, here are my risks. And then by the time I go to raise a seed round, here's the state that I'll be in. And then you calibrate the amount of money that you raise to spend to the risks that you're pulling out of the business. And I go through all this, in a sense this sounds kind of obvious, but I go through all this because it's a systematic way to think about how the money gets raised and deployed. As compared to so much of what's happening, especially these days, which is just, my God, let me go raise as much money as I can. Let me go build the fancy offices, let me go hire as many people as I can, and just kind of hope for the best."

The Onion Theory of Risk by Marc Andreessen: "I think the single biggest thing entrepreneurs are missing, both on fundraising and how they run their companies, is the relationship between risk and cash. The relationship between risk and raising cash, and then the relationship between risk and spending cash. So I've always been a fan of something that Andy Ratcliffe taught me years ago, which he called the onion theory of risk. Um, which basically is, you can think about a startup like on day one, um, as having every conceivable kind of risk, right? And you can basically just make a list of the risks. And so you've got, you know, founding team risk. You know, do the founders, are the founders gonna be able to work together? Do you have the right founders? You're gonna have product risk. You know, can you build a product? You'll have technical risk, right? Which is maybe you need a machine learning breakthrough or something to make it work. Are you gonna be able to do that? Um, you'll have, you know, launch risk. Will the launch go well? You'll have, you know, market acceptance risk. You'll have revenue risk. A big risk you get into in a lot of businesses that have a sales force is, can you actually sell the product for enough money to actually pay for the cost of sale? So you have the cost of sale risk. If you're a consumer product, you'll have a viral growth risk. Well, you get the thing of viral growth. And so, a startup at the very beginning is basically just this long list of risks. And then the way that I always think about running a startup is also the way I think about raising money, which is it's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go. And so you raise seed money in order to peel away the first two or three risks. The founding team risk, the product risk, and maybe the initial launch risk. You raise the A round to peel away the next level of product risk. Maybe you peel away some recruiting risk because you get your full engineering team built. Maybe you peel away some customer risk because you get your first five beta customers. And so basically the way to think about it is you're peeling away risk as you go. You're peeling away risk by achieving milestones. And then as you achieve milestones, you're both making progress in your business, and you're justifying raising more capital. And so you come in, and you pitch somebody like us, and you say you're raising a B round. The best way to do that with us is you say, okay, I raised a seed round, I achieved these milestones, I eliminated these risks. I raised the A round, I achieved these milestones, and I eliminated these risks. Now I'm gonna raise a B round. Here are my milestones, here are my risks. And then by the time I go to raise a seed round, here's the state that I'll be in. And then you calibrate the amount of money that you raise to spend to the risks that you're pulling out of the business. And I go through all this, in a sense this sounds kind of obvious, but I go through all this because it's a systematic way to think about how the money gets raised and deployed. As compared to so much of what's happening, especially these days, which is just, my God, let me go raise as much money as I can. Let me go build the fancy offices, let me go hire as many people as I can, and just kind of hope for the best."

Founder Mode

106,909 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Goldman: This guy is so clearly trying to follow the Putin model—using the government to make money for himself, making sure his allies control the most important companies in the country, including our media companies, doling out money by deregulating their industries, and taking money from them in return… And it’s getting closer and closer to that kind of Russian oligarchy that led to Vladimir Putin taking over as a dictator. I think that is exactly what Donald Trump is trying to do

Goldman: This guy is so clearly trying to follow the Putin model—using the government to make money for himself, making sure his allies control the most important companies in the country, including our media companies, doling out money by deregulating their industries, and taking money from them in return… And it’s getting closer and closer to that kind of Russian oligarchy that led to Vladimir Putin taking over as a dictator. I think that is exactly what Donald Trump is trying to do

Acyn

196,212 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

CZ: With My Chinese Background, My Parents Always Emphasized Saving Binance founder CZ CZ 🔶 BNB shared that his Chinese upbringing instilled in him the importance of saving, no matter how little you earn. He advises people to cut out meaningless expenses and carve out time every day to learn new skills. Drawing from his own days working as a dishwasher, CZ emphasized that by resisting the short-term dopamine of overspending, staying optimistic, and committing to long-term growth, anyone can ultimately regain control of their life and achieve financial freedom.

CZ: With My Chinese Background, My Parents Always Emphasized Saving Binance founder CZ CZ 🔶 BNB shared that his Chinese upbringing instilled in him the importance of saving, no matter how little you earn. He advises people to cut out meaningless expenses and carve out time every day to learn new skills. Drawing from his own days working as a dishwasher, CZ emphasized that by resisting the short-term dopamine of overspending, staying optimistic, and committing to long-term growth, anyone can ultimately regain control of their life and achieve financial freedom.

Wu Blockchain

18,596 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

CZ: Every country will ultimately need to have its own stablecoin On July 31, 2026, Binance founder CZ CZ 🔶 BNB stated in an interview at the ASEAN Tech Summit that the development of the blockchain industry depends on communication with regulators. As demand grows for more efficient payment systems in areas such as cross-border payments and AI, stablecoins are expected to become an important infrastructure for the digital economy. CZ believes that every country will eventually need to have its own stablecoin to support the development of its domestic digital finance ecosystem.

CZ: Every country will ultimately need to have its own stablecoin On July 31, 2026, Binance founder CZ CZ 🔶 BNB stated in an interview at the ASEAN Tech Summit that the development of the blockchain industry depends on communication with regulators. As demand grows for more efficient payment systems in areas such as cross-border payments and AI, stablecoins are expected to become an important infrastructure for the digital economy. CZ believes that every country will eventually need to have its own stablecoin to support the development of its domestic digital finance ecosystem.

Wu Blockchain

19,594 просмотров • 8 дней назад

TED NUGENT ENDORSES CHIP ROY FOR TX AG 🇺🇸 Ted Nugent asks @ChipRoyTX how he is going to protect Texas and "get justice" by going after out of control bureaucrats. "As well as the NGO's...that are pissing away our money."

TED NUGENT ENDORSES CHIP ROY FOR TX AG 🇺🇸 Ted Nugent asks @ChipRoyTX how he is going to protect Texas and "get justice" by going after out of control bureaucrats. "As well as the NGO's...that are pissing away our money."

Real America's Voice (RAV)

66,755 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I can’t say exactly how effective Bitcoin is as a money, but it’s being perceived by many as an alternative money and so is worth paying attention to. Money needs to be both a medium of exchange and a storehold of wealth — and the latter is more important. I doubt that any central bank will take it on as a reserve currency. That’s because all of the transactions are public, so there’s no privacy to it, and there’s a risk that in the future the code could be broken to make it less effective through government controls. My personal approach is that I do have some Bitcoin in my portfolio, but not much.

I can’t say exactly how effective Bitcoin is as a money, but it’s being perceived by many as an alternative money and so is worth paying attention to. Money needs to be both a medium of exchange and a storehold of wealth — and the latter is more important. I doubt that any central bank will take it on as a reserve currency. That’s because all of the transactions are public, so there’s no privacy to it, and there’s a risk that in the future the code could be broken to make it less effective through government controls. My personal approach is that I do have some Bitcoin in my portfolio, but not much.

Ray Dalio

353,005 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

.CZ 🔶 BNB grew up with a dirt floor and no running water, but made the most of every chance to learn about technology. He didn't have much materially, but he was happy. As CZ's worldview expanded, he saw a more open way for people to own, protect, and move value globally. So he built Binance to make the freedom of money widely available. Is he as happy today as he was then? CZ says: “Equally happy - I’m still a little child inside.” That sense of curiosity & enthusiasm for tech within him has never left. When building from a place of pure, authentic intent, the joy itself becomes the strongest motivation and scales into impact.

.CZ 🔶 BNB grew up with a dirt floor and no running water, but made the most of every chance to learn about technology. He didn't have much materially, but he was happy. As CZ's worldview expanded, he saw a more open way for people to own, protect, and move value globally. So he built Binance to make the freedom of money widely available. Is he as happy today as he was then? CZ says: “Equally happy - I’m still a little child inside.” That sense of curiosity & enthusiasm for tech within him has never left. When building from a place of pure, authentic intent, the joy itself becomes the strongest motivation and scales into impact.

YZi Labs

19,317 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад