Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

DA Bregman: If ICE comes in without a warrant, without reasonable suspicion, without probable cause, that is false imprisonment in New Mexico. You can’t confine, restrain, or detain someone without proper legal authority to do so. And there’s no exception for law enforcement. So we are going to hold... show more

Acyn

709,281 subscribers

78,487 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents admit on video that they illegally pulled over a car driving down a street in Minneapolis. In the video, multiple ICE agents are seen surrounding a civilian vehicle with several cars. Both back doors of the vehicle are open as agents stand around it. An ICE agent is heard saying: “We just want to make sure you are good, you were driving like a complete maniac, and the way that you’re acting, we have to verify if you are good, and then we will be out of here.” That statement matters… because ICE does not have general authority to conduct traffic stops. Immigration enforcement agents cannot pull someone over for alleged driving behavior. That power belongs to state and local law enforcement, not federal immigration officers. There is no claim of a specific crime. No explanation of probable cause. No warrant shown. Just ICE agents stopping a car, detaining the occupants, and admitting on camera that they initiated the stop based on how someone was “driving.” That is an unlawful stop. Under the Constitution, law enforcement cannot seize or detain someone without legal authority or probable cause. Blocking a vehicle, surrounding it with agents, opening doors, and questioning occupants is a seizure… and doing so without lawful authority is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. If ICE can pull over random cars, invent a reason, and detain people with no warrant and no authority, then the question isn’t whether this was illegal… It’s how many more unconstitutional stops they’ll get away with before someone gets hurt again.

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents admit on video that they illegally pulled over a car driving down a street in Minneapolis. In the video, multiple ICE agents are seen surrounding a civilian vehicle with several cars. Both back doors of the vehicle are open as agents stand around it. An ICE agent is heard saying: “We just want to make sure you are good, you were driving like a complete maniac, and the way that you’re acting, we have to verify if you are good, and then we will be out of here.” That statement matters… because ICE does not have general authority to conduct traffic stops. Immigration enforcement agents cannot pull someone over for alleged driving behavior. That power belongs to state and local law enforcement, not federal immigration officers. There is no claim of a specific crime. No explanation of probable cause. No warrant shown. Just ICE agents stopping a car, detaining the occupants, and admitting on camera that they initiated the stop based on how someone was “driving.” That is an unlawful stop. Under the Constitution, law enforcement cannot seize or detain someone without legal authority or probable cause. Blocking a vehicle, surrounding it with agents, opening doors, and questioning occupants is a seizure… and doing so without lawful authority is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. If ICE can pull over random cars, invent a reason, and detain people with no warrant and no authority, then the question isn’t whether this was illegal… It’s how many more unconstitutional stops they’ll get away with before someone gets hurt again.

Jesus Freakin Congress

125,990 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

No one is above the law — not ICE, not CBP, and not Donald Trump. Federal agents who assault or detain New Yorkers without legal authority must be held accountable and the NYPD must protect our neighbors if the federal government refuses to.

No one is above the law — not ICE, not CBP, and not Donald Trump. Federal agents who assault or detain New Yorkers without legal authority must be held accountable and the NYPD must protect our neighbors if the federal government refuses to.

Rep. Dan Goldman

742,946 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

.Richard Blumenthal to ICE Acting Dir. Todd Lyons on arrests without warrants: "This is not a warrant, it's a permission slip. It's a green light from another ICE agent to go bash down a door, smash into a home, detain and arrest someone—without a judge finding probable cause."

.Richard Blumenthal to ICE Acting Dir. Todd Lyons on arrests without warrants: "This is not a warrant, it's a permission slip. It's a green light from another ICE agent to go bash down a door, smash into a home, detain and arrest someone—without a judge finding probable cause."

CSPAN

10,993 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

.Thomas D. Homan: "This false narrative being pushed is a reason why there's an over 1,000% increase in the assaults on ICE officers... We don't arrest somebody or detain somebody without reasonable suspicion... Racial profile is NOT happening."

Rapid Response 47

94,824 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Blumenthal on administrative warrants: "This is not a warrant. It's a permission slip. It's a green light from another ICE agent to go bash down a door, smash into a home, detain and arrest someone without a judge finding probable cause."

Blumenthal on administrative warrants: "This is not a warrant. It's a permission slip. It's a green light from another ICE agent to go bash down a door, smash into a home, detain and arrest someone without a judge finding probable cause."

Aaron Rupar

33,787 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

They DO NOT “have to establish he is a US citizen” The Fourth Amendment protects you. ICE cannot legally stop or detain you just to “check your citizenship” without reasonable suspicion, probable cause, or a valid warrant where required. Know your rights. Stay calm. Do not consent. FIGHT ICE, FIGHT TRUMP, FIGHT FASCISM: Say: * “Am I free to leave?” * “I am exercising my right to remain silent.” * “I do not consent to any searches.” * “I want to speak to a lawyer.” Film EVERYTHING

They DO NOT “have to establish he is a US citizen” The Fourth Amendment protects you. ICE cannot legally stop or detain you just to “check your citizenship” without reasonable suspicion, probable cause, or a valid warrant where required. Know your rights. Stay calm. Do not consent. FIGHT ICE, FIGHT TRUMP, FIGHT FASCISM: Say: * “Am I free to leave?” * “I am exercising my right to remain silent.” * “I do not consent to any searches.” * “I want to speak to a lawyer.” Film EVERYTHING

Joe Walsh

31,462 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Vance on whether ICE entering homes without a warrant is legal: "That's what we think. That's our understanding of the law"

Vance on whether ICE entering homes without a warrant is legal: "That's what we think. That's our understanding of the law"

FactPost

146,613 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

NYPD Arrests ICE Agent Accused of Trying to Detain People Without a Warrant — What’s Your Take?

NYPD Arrests ICE Agent Accused of Trying to Detain People Without a Warrant — What’s Your Take?

Marin

76,618 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨An ICE agent illegally pulled over a car in Farmingdale, Maine… without probable cause… and tried to tell people, legally in the U.S., that they don’t have the right to stay. The agent says, on video, “Just because you came to this country and applied for asylum… doesn’t mean you get to stay here.” Except… it literally does. That’s not an opinion. That’s the law. If you apply for asylum, you have a legal right to remain in the United States while your case is processed. Period. So what just happened here? An armed federal agent pulled over a vehicle, without probable cause, misstated the law, and tried to intimidate people out of rights they legally have. That’s a constitutional violation. The Fourth Amendment requires probable cause to stop and detain someone. You don’t get to pull people over just because you feel like it or because of who they are. And Maine law enforcement has already made this clear in other cases… if there’s no probable cause, you don’t get to hold someone. That’s a basic constitutional protection. Then there’s due process… Asylum seekers are in a legal process. They are not “illegal” for being here. The government itself allowed them in while their cases are pending. So, when an ICE agent tells them they don’t have the right to stay… That’s not just wrong, that’s the government lying about your rights to your face. And when the people in the car pushed back… when they actually knew the law… The agent left. Because he never had the legal authority to begin with. This is the pattern we keep seeing… People with legal status being stopped, questioned, detained, or targeted anyway. Even recent reporting out of Maine shows asylum seekers, with no criminal records, being stopped during enforcement operations, and taken. They test the line… cross it… and hope nobody notices. That’s how intimidation works. And no one is holding them accountable.

🚨An ICE agent illegally pulled over a car in Farmingdale, Maine… without probable cause… and tried to tell people, legally in the U.S., that they don’t have the right to stay. The agent says, on video, “Just because you came to this country and applied for asylum… doesn’t mean you get to stay here.” Except… it literally does. That’s not an opinion. That’s the law. If you apply for asylum, you have a legal right to remain in the United States while your case is processed. Period. So what just happened here? An armed federal agent pulled over a vehicle, without probable cause, misstated the law, and tried to intimidate people out of rights they legally have. That’s a constitutional violation. The Fourth Amendment requires probable cause to stop and detain someone. You don’t get to pull people over just because you feel like it or because of who they are. And Maine law enforcement has already made this clear in other cases… if there’s no probable cause, you don’t get to hold someone. That’s a basic constitutional protection. Then there’s due process… Asylum seekers are in a legal process. They are not “illegal” for being here. The government itself allowed them in while their cases are pending. So, when an ICE agent tells them they don’t have the right to stay… That’s not just wrong, that’s the government lying about your rights to your face. And when the people in the car pushed back… when they actually knew the law… The agent left. Because he never had the legal authority to begin with. This is the pattern we keep seeing… People with legal status being stopped, questioned, detained, or targeted anyway. Even recent reporting out of Maine shows asylum seekers, with no criminal records, being stopped during enforcement operations, and taken. They test the line… cross it… and hope nobody notices. That’s how intimidation works. And no one is holding them accountable.

Jesus Freakin Congress

56,369 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Let’s be clear. Tom Homan basically is saying ICE is above the law: “People need to understand ICE officers and Border Patrol don't need probable cause to walk up to somebody, briefly detain them, and question them ... based on their physical appearance." Fact check: The Constitution and existing statutes still require at least reasonable suspicion (and for an actual arrest, probable cause) — and courts have said repeatedly that race or apparent ethnicity alone can’t supply that suspicion.

Let’s be clear. Tom Homan basically is saying ICE is above the law: “People need to understand ICE officers and Border Patrol don't need probable cause to walk up to somebody, briefly detain them, and question them ... based on their physical appearance." Fact check: The Constitution and existing statutes still require at least reasonable suspicion (and for an actual arrest, probable cause) — and courts have said repeatedly that race or apparent ethnicity alone can’t supply that suspicion.

Ed Krassenstein

186,790 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

An officer tried to step inside without permission, turning a simple “we’re just checking” into a tense standoff about rights, consent, and where authority actually ends at your front door. If law enforcement shows up without a warrant, do you let them in to avoid trouble or stand firm on your rights?

An officer tried to step inside without permission, turning a simple “we’re just checking” into a tense standoff about rights, consent, and where authority actually ends at your front door. If law enforcement shows up without a warrant, do you let them in to avoid trouble or stand firm on your rights?

JACK CARTER

1,031,351 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

NOW: "You do not have to open without a warrant!" - Neighbors YELL to residents in a home as ICE Agents knock on the door and say they're looking for someone in Maplewood, Minnesota.

NOW: "You do not have to open without a warrant!" - Neighbors YELL to residents in a home as ICE Agents knock on the door and say they're looking for someone in Maplewood, Minnesota.

Oliya Scootercaster 🛴

82,383 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

"We will hold you accountable very swiftly and severely...Be forewarned. If you want to take a potshot at an ICE agent or any law enforcement, you are going to have *SEVERE* consequences."

"We will hold you accountable very swiftly and severely...Be forewarned. If you want to take a potshot at an ICE agent or any law enforcement, you are going to have SEVERE consequences."

✨Rojas✨

120,583 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Federal law dictates that ICE and CBP are responsible for immigration enforcement. Cool. Can't dispute that. But even government agents must abide by State laws - unless a federal law exists that overrides State law. It's time for Democratic Mayors to start arresting ICE agents who are kidnapping American citizens and immigrants off the streets, at their place of employment, and their homes - without cause, without identifying, and without warrants. Thanks to Philadelphia DA Larry Krashner for laying it all out there. 👇👇👇👇👇

Federal law dictates that ICE and CBP are responsible for immigration enforcement. Cool. Can't dispute that. But even government agents must abide by State laws - unless a federal law exists that overrides State law. It's time for Democratic Mayors to start arresting ICE agents who are kidnapping American citizens and immigrants off the streets, at their place of employment, and their homes - without cause, without identifying, and without warrants. Thanks to Philadelphia DA Larry Krashner for laying it all out there. 👇👇👇👇👇

Gene Trevino

168,510 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

We can’t protest, we can’t carry firearms, ICE can come in our homes without a warrant, no one gets a fair hearing, they can kill us for any reason.. we literally have lost our 1,2,4,5 and 8th amendments to ICE‼️

We can’t protest, we can’t carry firearms, ICE can come in our homes without a warrant, no one gets a fair hearing, they can kill us for any reason.. we literally have lost our 1,2,4,5 and 8th amendments to ICE‼️

Meidas_Charise Lee

24,402 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

an officer is not allowed to detain you without cause or a warrant She was a harassing them all day and then she was obstructing them that is probable cause she's obstructing justice keeping them from doing their job arresting illegal migrants.

an officer is not allowed to detain you without cause or a warrant She was a harassing them all day and then she was obstructing them that is probable cause she's obstructing justice keeping them from doing their job arresting illegal migrants.

Sebastian™

14,569 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

If people want to riot and fight federal law enforcement over deportations, don’t back down, send more support. Make sure ICE can do its job without interference, and hold every single person obstructing them fully accountable.

If people want to riot and fight federal law enforcement over deportations, don’t back down, send more support. Make sure ICE can do its job without interference, and hold every single person obstructing them fully accountable.

Jeffery Mead

98,074 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Q: Are you okay with federal agents and officers violating people's 4th Amendment rights by asking for papers without reasonable suspicion? KRISTI NOEM: Every single action that our ICE officers take is according to the law and following protocols that we have used for years. They are doing everything correctly

Q: Are you okay with federal agents and officers violating people's 4th Amendment rights by asking for papers without reasonable suspicion? KRISTI NOEM: Every single action that our ICE officers take is according to the law and following protocols that we have used for years. They are doing everything correctly

Aaron Rupar

105,895 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨Another day, another video of ICE agents demanding a U.S. citizen prove his citizenship… this time, in Philadelphia. In the video, ICE agents box in a man’s car and immediately demand ID, without giving an explanation… Just, “There is a subject we are looking for.” The man responds exactly how anyone who knows their rights would: “What did I do?” And that matters… Because under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement cannot detain you just to “check.” They need reasonable, articulable suspicion that you committed a crime, or are the specific person they’re looking for. Not just the same race, or, “you look like someone.” When agents surround a vehicle so you can’t leave, that’s a seizure, legally. That triggers constitutional protections. Instead of articulating a reason, the agent shifts the language: “I need to verify your identity.” No, they don’t. They can only demand identification if the stop, itself, is lawful. And the stop is only lawful if they can clearly explain why they believe you are the subject they’re looking for. Notice what they never say in the video: -They never describe the suspect. -They never state a crime. -They never explain how he matches the person they are “looking for.” Just, “we’re looking for someone.” That is not enough. Then, the agent tries to grab the man’s ID without consent. The man pulls it back and says, “Don’t touch my ID.” He’s right. Officers don’t get to physically seize your property without legal authority. The agent then looks at the ID from a distance and walks away. Which tells us something important… If they truly had probable cause, this would not have ended with a casual glance and retreat. ICE does not have authority to randomly stop citizens to “verify” they’re not someone else. That is exactly the kind of policing the Constitution was written to prevent. If agents can box in your car, demand your identity without stating a crime, and fish for compliance… then everyone’s rights are conditional. And conditional rights aren’t rights at all.

🚨Another day, another video of ICE agents demanding a U.S. citizen prove his citizenship… this time, in Philadelphia. In the video, ICE agents box in a man’s car and immediately demand ID, without giving an explanation… Just, “There is a subject we are looking for.” The man responds exactly how anyone who knows their rights would: “What did I do?” And that matters… Because under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement cannot detain you just to “check.” They need reasonable, articulable suspicion that you committed a crime, or are the specific person they’re looking for. Not just the same race, or, “you look like someone.” When agents surround a vehicle so you can’t leave, that’s a seizure, legally. That triggers constitutional protections. Instead of articulating a reason, the agent shifts the language: “I need to verify your identity.” No, they don’t. They can only demand identification if the stop, itself, is lawful. And the stop is only lawful if they can clearly explain why they believe you are the subject they’re looking for. Notice what they never say in the video: -They never describe the suspect. -They never state a crime. -They never explain how he matches the person they are “looking for.” Just, “we’re looking for someone.” That is not enough. Then, the agent tries to grab the man’s ID without consent. The man pulls it back and says, “Don’t touch my ID.” He’s right. Officers don’t get to physically seize your property without legal authority. The agent then looks at the ID from a distance and walks away. Which tells us something important… If they truly had probable cause, this would not have ended with a casual glance and retreat. ICE does not have authority to randomly stop citizens to “verify” they’re not someone else. That is exactly the kind of policing the Constitution was written to prevent. If agents can box in your car, demand your identity without stating a crime, and fish for compliance… then everyone’s rights are conditional. And conditional rights aren’t rights at all.

Jesus Freakin Congress

77,547 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce