Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Dan Albas (Dan Albas) came with facts: C-SPAN, a major Canadian shipbuilder, says it can’t compete because of red tape and high taxes. So what does Chrystia Freeland say? She pivots. Of course she does. Not to policy. Not to solutions. She blames you. “Well, Canadian workers earn more.”...

38,729 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Chrystia Freeland didn’t need a handler. US cable booked her precisely because she delivers the sermon they want: Trump is the disease, American voters are the relapse, and “Team Democracy” is on life support because they elected him twice. She sat on an American set, declared their country the place where democracy is dying, mocked “capitulating” CEOs and university presidents, and offered Minneapolis free beer in Canada. The arrogance. A politician her own party just rejected still talks as if she is the adult in the room and 77 million American voters are children who failed a grade school civics test She is no longer finance minister, deputy PM, or even an MP. Lecturing Americans does nothing for Canadian workers facing tariffs, housing costs, or the deficits she helped run. Who does this serve—Canada, or Freeland’s residual media brand? Imagine a hated Republican flying to Toronto to tell Canadians their democracy is rotting after a decade of Liberal rule, Emergencies Act overreach, the massive influx of immigrants, a housing crisis and collapsing affordability. The same crowd cheering Freeland would call it colonial arrogance. Why is the reverse treated as courage? She even admitted Trump was right about the China shock—then pivoted to scolding Americans for voting the “wrong” way. If the diagnosis is real, why is the prescription a moral lecture from someone Canadians already discarded? How does this help Carney negotiate? How does it lower a single tariff? It doesn’t. It is condescension dressed up as solidarity, and it reminds everyone why she wasn't elected leader Chrystia Freeland

cbcwatcher

48,080 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

This woman walked into this ice cream shop and ordered an ice cream cone. When they handed it to her she told them she couldn’t pay for it. 😳 The employees said she had to pay for it. She didn’t have any money. She asks them if they are going to call the cops. This male customer sitting there chimes in and says if they call the cops he will be a witness. The woman said she told them she wanted it for free but the man said that’s not true. He said he watched her the whole time. She tries to put it down on the countertop but the employee tells her don’t leave it there. So she walks over and throws it in the trash. The witness tells her “this is what entitlement looks like” as she walks out the door. Some people said why not just buy the ice cream for her, to have a heart, because you never know what someone is going through. Others said if she had asked the right way and told them up front she didn’t have any money then maybe they would have purchased it for her but to come in and order and THEN tell them you don’t have any money is just wrong. This wasn’t a steak or a burger or a meal, I could see buying her those things to help someone out that is hungry but an ice cream is not a necessity. No one owes anyone anything. What do you think? Should one of them have bought the ice cream for her, given it to her for free? Or do you think she was trying to get something for free and trying to take advantage of them?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

1,233,553 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I’ve had a lot of people say Candace will move to Russia soon. I don’t think so. Her visit didn’t go well. I watched many of the PR interviews they set up for her and they were disasters. I don’t know if it was a language barrier that made her come off as so stupid or if she didn’t want to really talk but she didn’t do well in any of them. She couldn’t even answer the questions they asked many times. One interviewer had to ask her twice many questions. She answered most every question with “family is important” for an hour. It was weird. The next interview (and I’ll post it again here) is a friend of Putin and I guess didn’t know she was Catholic. Because he basically said the Catholic Church was corrupt and satanists. They had become super liberal even so much so that they did same sex marriages. And that France and the opening of the Olympic Games proved it. You could see she was upset and instead of defending the Church as not liberal or corrupt, she went on a Bridgette and France is bad answer. I think one reason she did that is she knew this guy was Putins friend and popular in Russia. She couldn’t push back on him. She was clearly not comfortable the entire interview. 30 minutes in she cut the interview and said we need to close it here. Her interviews were a disaster, her security guy almost died (I’m still on the fence about the story on why he was sick) and Ukraine bombed close to the hotel and event. She can say all she wants Russia is amazing. She’s lying. I think she found out just how not amazing it is.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

41,792 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

So here’s Patty Hajdu, Canada’s Jobs Minister, explaining why it’s totally fine that young Canadians can’t find work. She actually said this: “Temporary foreign workers are about 70% less than a few months ago. Low-wage TFWs are less than 1% of the workforce.” Sounds good, right? But then in the very next breath she admitted the program is still “critical” in areas with low unemployment, the kind of loophole that allows McDonald’s and Tim Hortons to keep importing cheap foreign labor while Canadian kids sit at home without jobs. And when she was pressed on that abuse, she didn’t deny it. She bragged that the process is “onerous.” Employers have to post on the Job Bank for four weeks, pay a fee, do an interview. Then Ottawa “tracks” the applications. In other words, she defended the bureaucracy, not Canadian workers. But the real kicker came when she was asked about youth unemployment. She admitted it’s spiking, but shrugged it off with a metaphor: “Many economists say youth are the canary in the coal mine.” The canary in the coal mine? Imagine being twenty years old, can’t find a job, rent’s through the roof, and your government calls you a canary. So let’s translate this. If you’re a Temporary Foreign Worker, life is good, Ottawa built an entire program to protect your job. If you’re a Liberal insider, life is even better, you get the contracts and the consultants’ fees. But if you’re a young Canadian? You’re the canary in the coal mine. That’s not a jobs plan. That’s contempt.

Dan Knight

111,382 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr