Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Dan Albas (Dan Albas) came with facts: C-SPAN, a major Canadian shipbuilder, says it can’t compete because of red tape and high taxes. So what does Chrystia Freeland say? She pivots. Of course she does. Not to policy. Not to solutions. She blames you. “Well, Canadian workers earn more.”...

DanKnightMMA's profile picture

Dan Knight

69,788 subscribers

38,729 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

“Transport Canada was made aware of six weeks before that announcement, and they did nothing to protect Canadian jobs.” Conservative MP Dan Albas (Dan Albas) lit up committee with that line, pointing to a Sept. 18 Globe and Mail report showing BC Ferries warned the Deputy Minister of Transport six weeks before the public found out a Chinese state-owned yard was getting the four-ship order—flatly at odds with Chrystia Freeland’s claim she was “shocked.” In plain English: Ottawa had a heads-up, then played dumb. Albas said the new timeline “blows a hole” in Freeland’s narrative that she wanted a Canadian build, and he pushed to recall Freeland to explain herself under oath. He also demanded Ottawa cancel the $1-billion CIB loan bankrolling the deal—“taxpayer money… going to a PRC shipyard”—and accused the government of abandoning Canadian workers while pretending otherwise. It’s the kind of story only a bureaucracy could love: say “Buy Canadian” at a podium, then ship the jobs overseas and call it arm’s-length.
3:20

“Transport Canada was made aware of six weeks before that announcement, and they did nothing to protect Canadian jobs.” Conservative MP Dan Albas (Dan Albas) lit up committee with that line, pointing to a Sept. 18 Globe and Mail report showing BC Ferries warned the Deputy Minister of Transport six weeks before the public found out a Chinese state-owned yard was getting the four-ship order—flatly at odds with Chrystia Freeland’s claim she was “shocked.” In plain English: Ottawa had a heads-up, then played dumb. Albas said the new timeline “blows a hole” in Freeland’s narrative that she wanted a Canadian build, and he pushed to recall Freeland to explain herself under oath. He also demanded Ottawa cancel the $1-billion CIB loan bankrolling the deal—“taxpayer money… going to a PRC shipyard”—and accused the government of abandoning Canadian workers while pretending otherwise. It’s the kind of story only a bureaucracy could love: say “Buy Canadian” at a podium, then ship the jobs overseas and call it arm’s-length.

Dan Knight

28,196 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Chrystia Freeland didn’t need a handler. US cable booked her precisely because she delivers the sermon they want: Trump is the disease, American voters are the relapse, and “Team Democracy” is on life support because they elected him twice. She sat on an American set, declared their country the place where democracy is dying, mocked “capitulating” CEOs and university presidents, and offered Minneapolis free beer in Canada. The arrogance. A politician her own party just rejected still talks as if she is the adult in the room and 77 million American voters are children who failed a grade school civics test She is no longer finance minister, deputy PM, or even an MP. Lecturing Americans does nothing for Canadian workers facing tariffs, housing costs, or the deficits she helped run. Who does this serve—Canada, or Freeland’s residual media brand? Imagine a hated Republican flying to Toronto to tell Canadians their democracy is rotting after a decade of Liberal rule, Emergencies Act overreach, the massive influx of immigrants, a housing crisis and collapsing affordability. The same crowd cheering Freeland would call it colonial arrogance. Why is the reverse treated as courage? She even admitted Trump was right about the China shock—then pivoted to scolding Americans for voting the “wrong” way. If the diagnosis is real, why is the prescription a moral lecture from someone Canadians already discarded? How does this help Carney negotiate? How does it lower a single tariff? It doesn’t. It is condescension dressed up as solidarity, and it reminds everyone why she wasn't elected leader Chrystia Freeland
7:37

Chrystia Freeland didn’t need a handler. US cable booked her precisely because she delivers the sermon they want: Trump is the disease, American voters are the relapse, and “Team Democracy” is on life support because they elected him twice. She sat on an American set, declared their country the place where democracy is dying, mocked “capitulating” CEOs and university presidents, and offered Minneapolis free beer in Canada. The arrogance. A politician her own party just rejected still talks as if she is the adult in the room and 77 million American voters are children who failed a grade school civics test She is no longer finance minister, deputy PM, or even an MP. Lecturing Americans does nothing for Canadian workers facing tariffs, housing costs, or the deficits she helped run. Who does this serve—Canada, or Freeland’s residual media brand? Imagine a hated Republican flying to Toronto to tell Canadians their democracy is rotting after a decade of Liberal rule, Emergencies Act overreach, the massive influx of immigrants, a housing crisis and collapsing affordability. The same crowd cheering Freeland would call it colonial arrogance. Why is the reverse treated as courage? She even admitted Trump was right about the China shock—then pivoted to scolding Americans for voting the “wrong” way. If the diagnosis is real, why is the prescription a moral lecture from someone Canadians already discarded? How does this help Carney negotiate? How does it lower a single tariff? It doesn’t. It is condescension dressed up as solidarity, and it reminds everyone why she wasn't elected leader Chrystia Freeland

cbcwatcher

48,080 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

Why is anyone putting a microphone in front of her? Chrystia Freeland is not the Finance Minister. She is a special advisor to Ukraine sitting on Bloomberg telling Americans they can “lose by winning,” comparing tariffs to Brexit, and then wrapping it with “Canadians want to support our prime minister.” That is not analysis. That is the same crew that spent a decade wrecking the books now trying to narrate the cleanup they never delivered. She ran Finance while deficits piled up, housing blew apart, and the country got lectured about how affordable life was. Now she is on U.S. television talking like she still speaks for Canada. She does not. She speaks for the brand. Steel, aluminum, autos — she is not wrong that those sectors get hurt. What she will not say is who left those sectors weaker before the first new tariff even landed. Eleven years of policy did that. She was in the room. Losing by winning is a cute line. Canada already lived it. We won the photo ops. We won the slogans. We won the lectures. Workers in Windsor, Hamilton, Saguenay and Oshawa got the bill. If Bloomberg wants a Canadian voice on trade, pick someone who has to live with the receipt. Not the minister who left and still talks like the country owes her an audience. 🎥 Beautifulcanada1 Who still thinks she should be the one explaining Canada to the United States? #cdnpoli #CanadaFirst
2:13

Why is anyone putting a microphone in front of her? Chrystia Freeland is not the Finance Minister. She is a special advisor to Ukraine sitting on Bloomberg telling Americans they can “lose by winning,” comparing tariffs to Brexit, and then wrapping it with “Canadians want to support our prime minister.” That is not analysis. That is the same crew that spent a decade wrecking the books now trying to narrate the cleanup they never delivered. She ran Finance while deficits piled up, housing blew apart, and the country got lectured about how affordable life was. Now she is on U.S. television talking like she still speaks for Canada. She does not. She speaks for the brand. Steel, aluminum, autos — she is not wrong that those sectors get hurt. What she will not say is who left those sectors weaker before the first new tariff even landed. Eleven years of policy did that. She was in the room. Losing by winning is a cute line. Canada already lived it. We won the photo ops. We won the slogans. We won the lectures. Workers in Windsor, Hamilton, Saguenay and Oshawa got the bill. If Bloomberg wants a Canadian voice on trade, pick someone who has to live with the receipt. Not the minister who left and still talks like the country owes her an audience. 🎥 Beautifulcanada1 Who still thinks she should be the one explaining Canada to the United States? #cdnpoli #CanadaFirst

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

21,228 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

This woman walked into this ice cream shop and ordered an ice cream cone. When they handed it to her she told them she couldn’t pay for it. 😳 The employees said she had to pay for it. She didn’t have any money. She asks them if they are going to call the cops. This male customer sitting there chimes in and says if they call the cops he will be a witness. The woman said she told them she wanted it for free but the man said that’s not true. He said he watched her the whole time. She tries to put it down on the countertop but the employee tells her don’t leave it there. So she walks over and throws it in the trash. The witness tells her “this is what entitlement looks like” as she walks out the door. Some people said why not just buy the ice cream for her, to have a heart, because you never know what someone is going through. Others said if she had asked the right way and told them up front she didn’t have any money then maybe they would have purchased it for her but to come in and order and THEN tell them you don’t have any money is just wrong. This wasn’t a steak or a burger or a meal, I could see buying her those things to help someone out that is hungry but an ice cream is not a necessity. No one owes anyone anything. What do you think? Should one of them have bought the ice cream for her, given it to her for free? Or do you think she was trying to get something for free and trying to take advantage of them?
1:43

This woman walked into this ice cream shop and ordered an ice cream cone. When they handed it to her she told them she couldn’t pay for it. 😳 The employees said she had to pay for it. She didn’t have any money. She asks them if they are going to call the cops. This male customer sitting there chimes in and says if they call the cops he will be a witness. The woman said she told them she wanted it for free but the man said that’s not true. He said he watched her the whole time. She tries to put it down on the countertop but the employee tells her don’t leave it there. So she walks over and throws it in the trash. The witness tells her “this is what entitlement looks like” as she walks out the door. Some people said why not just buy the ice cream for her, to have a heart, because you never know what someone is going through. Others said if she had asked the right way and told them up front she didn’t have any money then maybe they would have purchased it for her but to come in and order and THEN tell them you don’t have any money is just wrong. This wasn’t a steak or a burger or a meal, I could see buying her those things to help someone out that is hungry but an ice cream is not a necessity. No one owes anyone anything. What do you think? Should one of them have bought the ice cream for her, given it to her for free? Or do you think she was trying to get something for free and trying to take advantage of them?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

1,233,553 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This woman was visiting Japan, while there she stayed in what she thought was a reputable hotel. When she got back to her room from sight seeing, she laid on her bad and noticed a strange smell. She looked around and couldn’t see anything then she looked under the bed and saw the eyes of a man. She screamed loudly and then he screamed and ran out. The hotel employees immediately came up to the room and called the police. She asked the hotel workers how something like this happened. Their response to her was suspicious and chilling, they said that the police will never find him because they don’t have cameras. She checked out and demanded a refund, they offered her $178 in hotel credit coupons. They eventually refunded her $600 but still didn’t do a report because they claim they need to clarify the details of what happened. Based on how uncooperative they were and how they were refusing to acknowledge and accept responsibility, is it entirely possible it was a hotel worker and they are covering for them, why else would a hotel chain not have security cameras?
2:17

This woman was visiting Japan, while there she stayed in what she thought was a reputable hotel. When she got back to her room from sight seeing, she laid on her bad and noticed a strange smell. She looked around and couldn’t see anything then she looked under the bed and saw the eyes of a man. She screamed loudly and then he screamed and ran out. The hotel employees immediately came up to the room and called the police. She asked the hotel workers how something like this happened. Their response to her was suspicious and chilling, they said that the police will never find him because they don’t have cameras. She checked out and demanded a refund, they offered her $178 in hotel credit coupons. They eventually refunded her $600 but still didn’t do a report because they claim they need to clarify the details of what happened. Based on how uncooperative they were and how they were refusing to acknowledge and accept responsibility, is it entirely possible it was a hotel worker and they are covering for them, why else would a hotel chain not have security cameras?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

440,407 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Kendra Lust on telling her 10 year old daughter that her job is being a c0rnstar. She says she started telling her when she was 6 when they were at an event and people called out her name and she asked "why are they calling you that Mom" and she had told her it was her model name for work. She says each year she developed she and her husband began to talk to her about things,she revealed that on her daughter's 10th birthday she came up to her and said "you know mom, kids know more than you think they know" Her daughter then told her that "you know mom I might not like what you do or agree with what you do for work but I have to respect it "
2:11

Sensitive content

Kendra Lust on telling her 10 year old daughter that her job is being a c0rnstar. She says she started telling her when she was 6 when they were at an event and people called out her name and she asked "why are they calling you that Mom" and she had told her it was her model name for work. She says each year she developed she and her husband began to talk to her about things,she revealed that on her daughter's 10th birthday she came up to her and said "you know mom, kids know more than you think they know" Her daughter then told her that "you know mom I might not like what you do or agree with what you do for work but I have to respect it "

𝙔𝙖gi

176,150 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

💥NEW: Chris Cuomo *BLASTS* Norah O’Donnell for reading WHCD gunman’s manifesto to Trump — and then pretending she wasn’t taking cheap shot💥 “It’s okay for CBS to have crazy talk from a crazy man read as verbatim fact. Why? Because they like sticking it to Trump. Norah O’Donnell liked the idea of the free shot! Why? All her friends would applaud!” “When he jumped her, what did she do?: ‘Oh, you think it’s about you?’ What? What is that? And now people are trying to say, ‘Oh, that was so clever.’ Why was it clever? Of course it’s about him. She was backing off it because she didn’t like getting hit!” “Norah wants the shine. She does not want the smoke ... She’s not built for that.”
2:00

💥NEW: Chris Cuomo *BLASTS* Norah O’Donnell for reading WHCD gunman’s manifesto to Trump — and then pretending she wasn’t taking cheap shot💥 “It’s okay for CBS to have crazy talk from a crazy man read as verbatim fact. Why? Because they like sticking it to Trump. Norah O’Donnell liked the idea of the free shot! Why? All her friends would applaud!” “When he jumped her, what did she do?: ‘Oh, you think it’s about you?’ What? What is that? And now people are trying to say, ‘Oh, that was so clever.’ Why was it clever? Of course it’s about him. She was backing off it because she didn’t like getting hit!” “Norah wants the shine. She does not want the smoke ... She’s not built for that.”

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

228,607 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

I love this old interview with Monica Bellucci because it perfectly illustrates why we can never have another Monica Bellucci. It's not because of her beauty. It's because no celebrity knows how to be authentic anymore. Notice how she answers that being Monica Bellucci is basically about not having a strong ego, then immediately proves it by being annoyed that she has to talk about herself. "In this industry you always have to say I, I, I..." Or how she clearly never filmed herself talking to "her followers", since her instinct is to describe being "normal", i.e., authentic, as separate from when cameras are rolling. "I live a normal life, and every now and then, there's a camera." Then, when asked what the French people think of her, instead of going on a rant praising how "awesome" they are, she just goes, "yeah, I think they like me a bit." Everything about her is literally the opposite of an influencer.
0:34

I love this old interview with Monica Bellucci because it perfectly illustrates why we can never have another Monica Bellucci. It's not because of her beauty. It's because no celebrity knows how to be authentic anymore. Notice how she answers that being Monica Bellucci is basically about not having a strong ego, then immediately proves it by being annoyed that she has to talk about herself. "In this industry you always have to say I, I, I..." Or how she clearly never filmed herself talking to "her followers", since her instinct is to describe being "normal", i.e., authentic, as separate from when cameras are rolling. "I live a normal life, and every now and then, there's a camera." Then, when asked what the French people think of her, instead of going on a rant praising how "awesome" they are, she just goes, "yeah, I think they like me a bit." Everything about her is literally the opposite of an influencer.

Mark Granza

2,789,706 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Candace knew about the lawsuit before she went to Rome. Yet she says she hadn’t had time to talk to her husband about it? So Candace Baby, they sent you the detailed information on why and that they were suing you the day you went to Rome but you are surprised by the suit when it dropped and haven’t had time to talk to Georgie about it? So no time on the plane or in Rome you and George discussed the lawsuit? Were you even together? If I received a detailed letter and notice a lawsuit was about to hit….it would be the main topic of conversation between my husband and I for days. Another lie of Candace, she always forgets what she says, and then has to spin it. One lie that gets another lie, which gets another lie going. She knew, George knew and their PR move now is to use George as the reason they will file up dismiss.
0:14

Candace knew about the lawsuit before she went to Rome. Yet she says she hadn’t had time to talk to her husband about it? So Candace Baby, they sent you the detailed information on why and that they were suing you the day you went to Rome but you are surprised by the suit when it dropped and haven’t had time to talk to Georgie about it? So no time on the plane or in Rome you and George discussed the lawsuit? Were you even together? If I received a detailed letter and notice a lawsuit was about to hit….it would be the main topic of conversation between my husband and I for days. Another lie of Candace, she always forgets what she says, and then has to spin it. One lie that gets another lie, which gets another lie going. She knew, George knew and their PR move now is to use George as the reason they will file up dismiss.

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

44,793 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I’ve had a lot of people say Candace will move to Russia soon. I don’t think so. Her visit didn’t go well. I watched many of the PR interviews they set up for her and they were disasters. I don’t know if it was a language barrier that made her come off as so stupid or if she didn’t want to really talk but she didn’t do well in any of them. She couldn’t even answer the questions they asked many times. One interviewer had to ask her twice many questions. She answered most every question with “family is important” for an hour. It was weird. The next interview (and I’ll post it again here) is a friend of Putin and I guess didn’t know she was Catholic. Because he basically said the Catholic Church was corrupt and satanists. They had become super liberal even so much so that they did same sex marriages. And that France and the opening of the Olympic Games proved it. You could see she was upset and instead of defending the Church as not liberal or corrupt, she went on a Bridgette and France is bad answer. I think one reason she did that is she knew this guy was Putins friend and popular in Russia. She couldn’t push back on him. She was clearly not comfortable the entire interview. 30 minutes in she cut the interview and said we need to close it here. Her interviews were a disaster, her security guy almost died (I’m still on the fence about the story on why he was sick) and Ukraine bombed close to the hotel and event. She can say all she wants Russia is amazing. She’s lying. I think she found out just how not amazing it is.
2:45

I’ve had a lot of people say Candace will move to Russia soon. I don’t think so. Her visit didn’t go well. I watched many of the PR interviews they set up for her and they were disasters. I don’t know if it was a language barrier that made her come off as so stupid or if she didn’t want to really talk but she didn’t do well in any of them. She couldn’t even answer the questions they asked many times. One interviewer had to ask her twice many questions. She answered most every question with “family is important” for an hour. It was weird. The next interview (and I’ll post it again here) is a friend of Putin and I guess didn’t know she was Catholic. Because he basically said the Catholic Church was corrupt and satanists. They had become super liberal even so much so that they did same sex marriages. And that France and the opening of the Olympic Games proved it. You could see she was upset and instead of defending the Church as not liberal or corrupt, she went on a Bridgette and France is bad answer. I think one reason she did that is she knew this guy was Putins friend and popular in Russia. She couldn’t push back on him. She was clearly not comfortable the entire interview. 30 minutes in she cut the interview and said we need to close it here. Her interviews were a disaster, her security guy almost died (I’m still on the fence about the story on why he was sick) and Ukraine bombed close to the hotel and event. She can say all she wants Russia is amazing. She’s lying. I think she found out just how not amazing it is.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

41,792 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A woman and her husband went to the store to get an Apple gift card for $100. After they got it, they had tried to use it for their iPhone. The opened the package and got the card out, the last few digits on the back of the card are missing and she couldn’t use it. She goes back to the store and speaks to customer service about a refund. Customer service claims they can’t do anything about it because there are no refunds on gift cards and they need to call the company the card is for. She then pulls a few of the same cards off of the display and opens them in front of customer service and proves to them that they all have the same issue. This does look like the card was manufactured defectively and the customer service rep acknowledged it, but why are they leaving it on the shelf for other people to buy it and be ripped off?
1:25

A woman and her husband went to the store to get an Apple gift card for $100. After they got it, they had tried to use it for their iPhone. The opened the package and got the card out, the last few digits on the back of the card are missing and she couldn’t use it. She goes back to the store and speaks to customer service about a refund. Customer service claims they can’t do anything about it because there are no refunds on gift cards and they need to call the company the card is for. She then pulls a few of the same cards off of the display and opens them in front of customer service and proves to them that they all have the same issue. This does look like the card was manufactured defectively and the customer service rep acknowledged it, but why are they leaving it on the shelf for other people to buy it and be ripped off?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

343,275 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This woman’s plane was delayed for over 10 hours, they had no where to go and had to sleep on the floor. When she slept, the airport then flooded. The flight she was supposed to be on then canceled and rescheduled for the next day. But the airport promised them free hotel rooms. After waiting for over an hour to get their luggage, she finds out her belongings were soaking wet and some of it was ruined. Then when she gets to go to the hotel she found out it was never booked and now she has to find a place to stay, most people would have canceled and moved on to another carrier, what could they do to make this up to you?
2:11

This woman’s plane was delayed for over 10 hours, they had no where to go and had to sleep on the floor. When she slept, the airport then flooded. The flight she was supposed to be on then canceled and rescheduled for the next day. But the airport promised them free hotel rooms. After waiting for over an hour to get their luggage, she finds out her belongings were soaking wet and some of it was ruined. Then when she gets to go to the hotel she found out it was never booked and now she has to find a place to stay, most people would have canceled and moved on to another carrier, what could they do to make this up to you?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

148,284 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

CBC claims that Donald Trump would treat Chrystia Freeland badly… because she’s a woman, and that’s how he treats women. Stop this propaganda already. From a broadcaster who went independent and now gets more views than the state funded CBC does (imagine what I could do with a billion dollars…) THIS propaganda and false rhetoric is exactly why you need the government money to stay afloat. As with any business… adjust your messaging in order to compete and thrive. Stop inviting guests like this on your show who likely don’t even believe what they say as it comes out of their mouth… because if you’ve ever heard women in trumps camp talk about him and how he treats them, you would never have this kind of a take away. If Trump treats Chrystia with cruelty, it’s because he knows what she has done—he sees right through her, and he knows that she is compromised and incapable of doing her job, which is why she was told she was fired and then resigned. NOT because she’s a woman.
0:40

CBC claims that Donald Trump would treat Chrystia Freeland badly… because she’s a woman, and that’s how he treats women. Stop this propaganda already. From a broadcaster who went independent and now gets more views than the state funded CBC does (imagine what I could do with a billion dollars…) THIS propaganda and false rhetoric is exactly why you need the government money to stay afloat. As with any business… adjust your messaging in order to compete and thrive. Stop inviting guests like this on your show who likely don’t even believe what they say as it comes out of their mouth… because if you’ve ever heard women in trumps camp talk about him and how he treats them, you would never have this kind of a take away. If Trump treats Chrystia with cruelty, it’s because he knows what she has done—he sees right through her, and he knows that she is compromised and incapable of doing her job, which is why she was told she was fired and then resigned. NOT because she’s a woman.

Jasmin Laine

56,992 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

So here’s Patty Hajdu, Canada’s Jobs Minister, explaining why it’s totally fine that young Canadians can’t find work. She actually said this: “Temporary foreign workers are about 70% less than a few months ago. Low-wage TFWs are less than 1% of the workforce.” Sounds good, right? But then in the very next breath she admitted the program is still “critical” in areas with low unemployment, the kind of loophole that allows McDonald’s and Tim Hortons to keep importing cheap foreign labor while Canadian kids sit at home without jobs. And when she was pressed on that abuse, she didn’t deny it. She bragged that the process is “onerous.” Employers have to post on the Job Bank for four weeks, pay a fee, do an interview. Then Ottawa “tracks” the applications. In other words, she defended the bureaucracy, not Canadian workers. But the real kicker came when she was asked about youth unemployment. She admitted it’s spiking, but shrugged it off with a metaphor: “Many economists say youth are the canary in the coal mine.” The canary in the coal mine? Imagine being twenty years old, can’t find a job, rent’s through the roof, and your government calls you a canary. So let’s translate this. If you’re a Temporary Foreign Worker, life is good, Ottawa built an entire program to protect your job. If you’re a Liberal insider, life is even better, you get the contracts and the consultants’ fees. But if you’re a young Canadian? You’re the canary in the coal mine. That’s not a jobs plan. That’s contempt.
4:23

So here’s Patty Hajdu, Canada’s Jobs Minister, explaining why it’s totally fine that young Canadians can’t find work. She actually said this: “Temporary foreign workers are about 70% less than a few months ago. Low-wage TFWs are less than 1% of the workforce.” Sounds good, right? But then in the very next breath she admitted the program is still “critical” in areas with low unemployment, the kind of loophole that allows McDonald’s and Tim Hortons to keep importing cheap foreign labor while Canadian kids sit at home without jobs. And when she was pressed on that abuse, she didn’t deny it. She bragged that the process is “onerous.” Employers have to post on the Job Bank for four weeks, pay a fee, do an interview. Then Ottawa “tracks” the applications. In other words, she defended the bureaucracy, not Canadian workers. But the real kicker came when she was asked about youth unemployment. She admitted it’s spiking, but shrugged it off with a metaphor: “Many economists say youth are the canary in the coal mine.” The canary in the coal mine? Imagine being twenty years old, can’t find a job, rent’s through the roof, and your government calls you a canary. So let’s translate this. If you’re a Temporary Foreign Worker, life is good, Ottawa built an entire program to protect your job. If you’re a Liberal insider, life is even better, you get the contracts and the consultants’ fees. But if you’re a young Canadian? You’re the canary in the coal mine. That’s not a jobs plan. That’s contempt.

Dan Knight

111,382 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This mother said all she got for Mother’s Day was Happy Mother’s Day texts from her 18 and 20 year old kids. So she said she is going to match their energy and when it comes time she is just going to text them Merry Christmas and Happy Birthday this year and that’s it. She said she’s not complaining and loves them to death but she is ready to meet them where they are at now in their life. She said she is sick of going above and beyond for them and basically getting nothing in return. So no more whatever they want gifts, no more money, etc. Sounds a little bit to me like complaining. 🤷‍♂️ What do you think? Do you think she’s right in handling it this way? Do you think that’s a fair way to handle it? Or do you think she’s overreacting and they are just typical young adults? Do you do things for your kids expecting the same in return?
1:31

This mother said all she got for Mother’s Day was Happy Mother’s Day texts from her 18 and 20 year old kids. So she said she is going to match their energy and when it comes time she is just going to text them Merry Christmas and Happy Birthday this year and that’s it. She said she’s not complaining and loves them to death but she is ready to meet them where they are at now in their life. She said she is sick of going above and beyond for them and basically getting nothing in return. So no more whatever they want gifts, no more money, etc. Sounds a little bit to me like complaining. 🤷‍♂️ What do you think? Do you think she’s right in handling it this way? Do you think that’s a fair way to handle it? Or do you think she’s overreacting and they are just typical young adults? Do you do things for your kids expecting the same in return?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

527,183 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten