Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

DAN DA DAN Alternative Ending Video Alternative ๐Ÿ”ž available in P4tr30n! Clean Up Support Shiditos BG Art.Parowy ๐Ÿ”ž VA Invader Noodles ๐ŸŒธ๐Ÿ’“ NSFW VA!

82,422 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfรผgbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

ร„hnliche Videos

TRAILER: Rift Runners Set 2, Shimmering Waves, is coming soon. June 20th 2001..... wait. Wrong timeline. Actually, pre-orders will open next month. Stay tuned. #RiftRunners #Vtuber #TradingCards (Voice acting by ShaderuVT, Music licensed by UPM) Featured in Video: Jorunna ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ’› Retro Eldritch Seaslug Vtuber Goony ๐Ÿฆ˜ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ VTuber VTUBER DUO!!! Cinnamon Twitches๐Ÿ’– Kari ๐Ÿชธmantis shrimptuber๐Ÿฆ lily h. ๐Ÿ’š๐Ÿงƒ// a gentle forest vtuber! Tatsu ๐Ÿณ๐Ÿ™ ใ‚ฟใƒ„ | Whale Shark ENVTuber @DragonSpit_ kyu ๐Ÿ‘โšก ใ€JoshikoProใ€‘ Vari Vtober ๐ŸŒ ๐Ÿช Aki Orange ๐Ÿถ๐ŸŠโ”Š V-EEPY ๐Ÿ’ค Yui! ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿชฝ Myra's Art Archive Purity Valentine ๐Ÿˆโค๏ธโ€๐Ÿฉน VTuber Hiyori (๐Ÿ”ž ASMR/VA) @ใ€JoshikoProใ€‘ Paichi ๐Ÿ„ ๐Ÿฏ ใ€DropOutsใ€‘ Additional Vtubers in the set: PiaPi ๐Ÿ‘ฝ๐Ÿฅ’Slime Girl @ ใ€BEASTIEZใ€‘๐Ÿ”œ TWITCHCON akiaji margo ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ„๐ŸŒฐใ€JoshikoProใ€‘ Pippa Pebblesworth๐Ÿง๐Ÿฉตใ€globieใ€‘- Graduated - Taring Hu ใ‚ฟใƒชใƒณใƒ•ใƒผ๐Ÿ…๐Ÿ’จ๐Ÿช™ใ€globieใ€‘ Reina Ronronea ๐Ÿงถ๐Ÿค˜๐Ÿปใ€globieใ€‘ Kumanui Miel ็†Š็ธซใƒŸใ‚จใƒซ๐Ÿงธ๐ŸŽ€ใ€globieใ€‘ Nyabi ๐Ÿ’œ๐Ÿˆโ€โฌ› Hiatus Renn ๐Ÿถ Horatius The Dwarf Hikaru ๐Ÿบ | ENVtuber ใ€HYSTERIAใ€‘๐Ÿ“† November 12th rurune ๐Ÿ‡๐ŸŽ’ Raein Clowd ๐ŸŒง๏ธ ๐Ÿฆโ€โฌ› ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ Miss Baka๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿงช @MiyaMareena Mimazingly Mim Daemo72 ๐ŸฆŒ๐Ÿ โœฆ Digital Artist โœฆ COMMS OPEN Ume Aino ๐ŸŒธ๐ŸŒ™ ๐ŸŒธHanayome๐ŸŒธ Orchid Mantis Vtuber๐Ÿ”ช Eclipse ๐Ÿ’œ Kliffoth๐Ÿ”ดใ€ฐ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ด A Modern Mothman (ยดโˆ€๏ฝ€)lapin ๐Ÿงท๐Ÿ“๐Ÿผ nekonyaki vtuber Pasta ๐Ÿ Mero Umiko ๐Ÿซง๐Ÿชผ ใ€Konbiniใ€‘

Rift Runners TCG

13,769 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr

FRANK TUREK & THE MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARING FACETIME (and why it matters) First, the facts: You can clearly see Dan Flood's arm & bracelet on Frank Turek's phone screen. It's not possible that it is a reflection nor can it be direct filming from Frank's phone, which eliminates FaceTime. The only alternative is a separate video feed streaming through Frank's phone. I theorize it's from a little drone zipping around, but I'm not married to that idea. Regardless, this video evidence must be grappled with. It's definitive. I'm not saying Frank has committed a crime. Streaming a feed isn't a crime. I'm not saying that it even has anything to do with death of Charlie. What I *AM* saying is that Frank alleged he was on FaceTime and that's simply incompatible with the video. This discrepancy must be resolved. Details matter. At least 3 other reasons this matters: 1. Frank alleged his phone was stuck on FaceTime in his back pocket until he was back at the hotel after being at the hospital for hours! But if it wasn't on FaceTime, what was really going on that whole time? Why did he claim that? 2. Who was controlling that feed? Is there a recording? It could contain important evidence to help solve the crime. 3. If it was a drone, why was it there, and who was controlling it? Not Frank. Not the security team. Not Mikey. Not Terryl. Not Blake. Who? This video evidence could end up being a nothing-burger, or it could be the tip of a massive iceberg. That's why I keep hammering it. Like, retweet, comment:

Sam Parker ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿงฏ

121,484 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 7 Monaten

The Dirty Little Secret About Homelessness Is Also The Key To Ending It The US Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments about what cities can and cannot do to end homelessness. "What if there is a bed available in the Gospel Rescue Mission, but Ms. Johnson, a person, doesn't want it? Doesnโ€™t wish to leave their pet. Her Rottweiler's not permitted there. So that is a difficult question for a person and a difficult policy question..." What everyone agreed on was that homelessness is a difficult problem. "Many people have mentioned this is a serious policy problemโ€ฆ So, the policy questions in this case are very difficultโ€ฆ.Martin speaks in terms of someone who is involuntarily homeless and that raises all of those policy questionsโ€ฆ We usually think about whether state law, local law already achieves those purposes so that the federal courts aren't micromanaging homeless policyโ€ฆ" I think most people listening to the Supreme Court would agree: it isnโ€™t going to solve homelessness. That is a job for state legislators. So why havenโ€™t they? Why has homelessness gotten worse? The answer that many homeless advocates give is that itโ€™s because we donโ€™t have enough homes, and poverty has increased. But neither is true. Poverty has steadily declined since the 1980s, when homelessness first became an issue of public concern. And very few people are on the street simply because they canโ€™t afford the rent. The evidence is overwhelming that the majority of people on the street are there because of untreated mental illness or addiction, which leads people to use all their money to support their drug habit and be high, rather than work. People who canโ€™t afford the rent but are able to work and arenโ€™t in the grip of addiction or untreated mental illness find a cheaper place to live, move somewhere cheaper, or live with family and friends. Itโ€™s true there arenโ€™t enough shelter beds, case workers, group homes, and psychiatric hospitals to care for the homeless. But a big part of the reason for that is that advocates for the homeless have, for 40 years, demanded that funding for dealing with the homeless go into giving people private studio apartments rather than building sufficient shelter beds. They call this โ€œHousing First,โ€ and its record is awful. Few stay in housing, and many die because it fails to treat the cause of the problem, addiction, and untreated mental illness rather than the symptoms. Studies find that cities that prioritize basic shelter over expensive housing reduce the deaths of homeless by 3-fold. And so in LA, homeless die at a rate 3 times higher than New York because living inside protects people from murder, drug overdose, and car accidents. Making matters worse, homeless advocates, along with the ACLU, have opposed expanding psychiatric hospitals, and mandatory care in general, because they believe itโ€™s worse to mandate hospitalization for people who are dangerously psychotic or manic than to simply leave them on the street. But itโ€™s not. Last year, 112,000 Americans died from drug overdose and poisoning because we failed to mandate treatment. Two of my friends from high school would still be alive today had we mandated they get treatment for addiction rather than letting them die. What is happening on homelessness is a record of failure. The number of drug deaths quintupled from 20,000 in 2022 to 112,000 last year. Thatโ€™s more people dying per year than died in Hiroshima. Homelessness is not a fundamental problem of housing. Itโ€™s a problem of enabling addiction and untreated mental illness, both of which lead people to give up on work, lie, steal, cheat their families and friends, and live on the street, where they turn to petty crime to sustain their drug habits. This seems cruel to many people, which is why homelessness has gotten worse. In other words, the reason homelessness has gotten worse is because weโ€™ve enabled it, and subsidized it, rather than funded treatment and recovery. Nobody has subsidized homelessness more than California, Washington, and Oregon. And itโ€™s been in those states that homelessness has worsened the most. Why? The homelessness groups really believe itโ€™s more cruel to mandate care than to let people die on the streets. But there is an ideology behind this, too. Itโ€™s the idea that people suffering from addiction and mental illness are victims of society or the system, which is fundamentally evil. And, according to their logic, to restore justice in the world, we must give victims whatever they want, including the right to camp anywhere and use hard drugs, even if it results in their death. You might call this "pathological altruism. Think of the Kathy Bates character in Misery. Or of the mother who poisons her child in order to have a sick person to take care of, like in โ€œSixth Sense.โ€ Itโ€™s no coincidence that the same people who believe this also think civilization is evil and should be replaced by something more akin to primitive anarchism, like the kind romanticized by intellectuals since Rousseau. The alternative to this dystopia is tough love. We need to give people the care they need, but thatโ€™s not through enabling addiction and illegal behavior, but rather enforcing laws and mandating care, as an alternative to jail, when they are broken. Itโ€™s not enough to do what many Republicans want to do, which is to enforce laws and recriminalize shoplifting and hard drugs simply. We need to do that, for sure. But states must also have caseworkers, group homes, and psychiatric hospitals so there is an alternative to jail, and so states can provide people with the specialized care where itโ€™s available, which simply isnโ€™t going to be in many of the small towns, like the one at the center of the Supreme Court hearing. The dirty little secret about homelessness, which is also the key to ending it, is...

Michael Shellenberger

29,148,070 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 2 Jahren

Dear Oyo State Government @seyiamakinde Oyo State Government Feedback We waited to read from you, but that is history now, we gave the people of Aiyelade community water [check the last video] to see how happy they were รˆ joor sir @seyiamakinde The good people of Ipeba - a locality in Ori Ire, Oyo State sent us to you. Ipeba is situated near Aiyelade and Idi-Emi. They do not have water. Access to safe water is a fundamental human need and, therefore, a basic human right. If this pops up on your timeline, please help tag [ Oyo State Government | @seyiamakinde | and Oyo State Government Feedback ] Water is essential not only to health, but also to poverty reduction, food security, peace and comfort Please deal ๐Ÿ™ TheRemmySaheed ๐Ÿ˜ Kamal๎จ€ Abeni Okin๐Ÿฆšโค๏ธ ๐‘ฐ๐’…๐’“๐’Š๐’” ๐‘จ. ๐‘ถ๐’๐’Š PhD Olรณwรณ รˆkรณ | แปŒmแป แบธฬ€แนฃhinLรณkรนn ๐Ÿ’œ Ibrahim Kazeem, MBA. FINE YORUBA GIRL ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ˜Žโœจ๐Ÿ’ฏ๐Ÿฆ‹ Abu-Sadeeq Idan of foods Ajokeee ๐Ÿค OMIDAN ร€Bแบธฬ€Nร โœจ Olowo Kuwait ๐Ÿงง ๐“ฃ๐“ฑ๐“ช๐“ฝ ๐“จ๐“ธ๐“ป๐“พ๐“ซ๐“ช ๐“—๐“ฒ๐“ณ๐“ช๐“ซ๐“ผ๐“ฝ๐“ฎ๐“ป๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ’› Man of Letters. Arojinle FAREEDA KIRI๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒน๐ŸŒน AUTA๐Ÿฅน Kameelahโค๏ธ๐Ÿง• Khalid ๐Ÿ’ธ HAKEEM SarkinFOTO Cool_Ustaaz โ˜ช ๐ŸคDan Albarka.๐Ÿค Hashim Ibrahim-Bolaji ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“‰๐Ÿ“ˆ Fatimah The Fabric Vendor. Akanni of Ogun | Mobile Grapher ๐Ÿ“ฝ๏ธ๐Ÿ“ฑ Muhammad Abdulakeem Shogunle Hazeezat Nosadiana Copy Counsel Zeeโค๏ธโœจ pappi โ™›, your designer Daddy Yankee ๐Ÿ˜€ (DY) BASH-AAR ๐Ÿ”ž Daddy Yas!!! Emerald ๐Ÿ’š ู‡ุฏุงูŠุฉ Eniola Holmes ๐Ÿ˜‰ Leeyah Fabrics N More ๐ŸŒบ Omoge Kara๐Ÿฆ‹๐Ÿ‘ง ๐ŸคSABR๐Ÿค Omo Mr. Fasasi ๐ŸŽ€ al-Imรฃmโ–ซ๏ธ Danjuma Aliagan, PhD

FTVF Foundation

108,270 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 2 Jahren

"You just hate Hichilema": The dramatic fall of Zambia's president By Sishuwa Sishuwa Hakainde Hichilema stood in the queue to becoming President of Zambia for 15 years before voters finally removed him from it in August 2021. This demonstrates how badly the man wanted this job. But it has taken him only five years in office to display his unfitness for the role. When it comes to the bigger national issues, such as safeguarding our cherished democracy, getting the best out of Zambiaโ€™s mineral wealth, respecting the constitution and the rule of law, fighting corruption beyond rhetoric, genuine promotion of national unity and equitable distribution of appointments to public service positions, sorting out the cost-of-living crisis and the deplorable conditions of life for most Zambians, Hichilema has lamentably failed. In fact, I would go as far as saying that the President has become a clear and present danger to Zambiaโ€™s economy, to our democracy, our constitutional order, our nationhood and its 'One Zambia Nation' foundation, and to the lives of ordinary Zambians. Voting Hichilema out of office will be the highest expression of patriotism. As I have previously stated, I am convinced that Hichilema will lose the election on 13 August. The only thing that can save him from defeat is pre-ballot death (of any candidate) or industrial scale vote-rigging. I really hope that we Zambians will never again elect a lying, tribal, corrupt, unpatriotic, vindictive, hypocritical, lawless, and undemocratic scumbag. In addition to his policy failures on major issues of public concern, one reason why Hichilema is losing the election (unless he rigs it on an industrial scale) is because of having extremist supporters, mostly Zambezi supremacists, who dismiss legitimate criticism of his leadership actions as hate speech and consequently enable his continued failure to be receptive to criticism, to reflect on the feedback provided by the governed, and to change for the better. When citizens (be it the Catholic Bishops, opposition parties, civic actors, or ordinary Zambians like me) raise governance concerns, they do so in the spirit of accountable democratic governance. They do not do so because they hate the president as a person, hate his ethnic identity, or hate where he was born. I insist that a better Zambia is possible but we wonโ€™t get it if we treat criticism of presidential leadership failure as expression of hate. Unfortunately, even Hichilema himself has embraced this warped thinking that any criticism of his leadership actions is hate speech. This attitude has deprived him of the much needed feedback on his leadership performance and capacity to listen to divergent views, consequently impoverishing his presidency. We must embrace the unfamiliar, eschew haste in passing judgement, and be more tolerant and understanding. These qualities are especially essential to those in public leadership roles. I once raised concern that we seem to have prepared different standards for this president compared to those who came before him. If a leader can only provide five hours of electricity to the people in a day, they have failed. If a leader can only increase the cost of living, they have failed. If a leaderโ€ฆI can go on. In addition to denying the president the benefit of legitimate public feedback on his performance, misconstruing criticism as hate makes it look like the responsibility of holding our public leaders to account falls on those who either love him or hail from the region where the president does not come from. If his supporters and Tongas, Lozis and Zambians from Northwestern Province join in calling out the wrongs of Hichilema, he will no longer play the tribal card of reducing all criticism of his leadership to ethnic hatred. In the uncritical minds of some of the president's supporters, I criticise Hichilema because I hate him! Most of the individuals who hold this view are people who repeatedly criticise me on this platform, even when their criticism is quite often devoid of reason or substance. I do not think those who criticise me do so because they hate me. I think they criticise me, even if I hold no elected public office, simply because they have a different take, different opinions, on things. Why is it so hard to apply the same logic to my criticism of an elected public leader like Hichilema who is accountable to us, the public? I have been providing regular political commentaries on Zambian affairs since 2009. Why was my much stronger criticism of Hichilema's predecessors, namely Rupiah Banda, Michael Sata, and Edgar Lungu, not considered hatred of these individual leaders? In fact, many of the individuals who today accuse me of harbouring hatred for Hichilema were people who were very happy with my much stinging criticism of the leadership failures of his predecessors. When I called Sata a tribalist and undemocratic leader who did not listen to advise, and provided evidence in support of my conclusions, they were happy to cheer me on, even as Sata's supporters said I was bitter and a Hichilema supporter. When I called Lungu a tribalist and corrupt leader, and provided evidence in support of my conclusions, they were happy to cheer me on, even as Lungu's supporters said I was bitter and petitioned the police to arrest me for sedition. Some of Hichilema's supporters, as part of the enjoyment of their exercise of the right to free expression, even insult me, call me names, or outrightly declare that they dislike me. Of course I would prefer content-based discussion, but if the best that anyone's mind can do is to insult me, I will consider their actions as part of the right to free expression. I recognise that people have the right to dislike me, to call me names, to wish me whatever they desire, to feel however they want about me. I have no problem with all this. I do not speak to be liked or secure the validation of anyone. I speak to express myself and I respect the right of other people to do the same. As I have repeatedly stated, free speech is not just for the people or thoughts we like or agree with; it is also for people we despise and opinions that we do not support. The important point is not the position I take on a given issue of public interest. It is the reasoning advanced in support of said position. If I say Hichilema is a lying, tribal, corrupt, unpatriotic, vindictive, hypocritical, lawless, and undemocratic scumbag, what is important is not simply this description; it is the reasons and evidence I have adduced in support of this conclusion. Anyone is welcome to challenge my conclusions or evidence, to say "I disagree with your argument for this and that reason." What I totally reject is the idea that criticism of a president's leadership actions amounts to hate; it does not. If I point out that Hichilema is failing to ensure adequate ethnic diversity in public appointments and provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. If I point out that Hichilema is a compulsive liar and provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. If I point out that Hichilemaโ€™s fight against corruption is a sham and provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. If I point out that Hichilema is a compulsive liar and provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. If I point out that Hichilema has eroded Zambiaโ€™s democracy and provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. If I point out that Hichilema has failed to reduce the cost of living, as per his campaign promise, and provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. If I point out that Hichilema (working in cohort with his friend Situmbeko Musokotwane) has facilitated the extraction of the countryโ€™s mineral wealth by multinational corporations without ensuring sufficient returns in revenue collection for Zambia and provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. If I point out that Hichilema has failed toโ€ฆand provide evidence in support of this assertion, anybody else is welcome to demonstrate weakness in my stated point of view. Simply dismissing my criticism as an expression of my alleged hatred for Hichilema is most unhelpful. Those who do so are depriving me the opportunity to learn what I do not know and Hichilema the opportunity to adjust his leadership style and change for the better. While I do not hesitate to share my opinions on matters of public concern, I also retain the intellectual integrity of one who is willing to abandon their point of view if its weakness can be shown. I have repeatedly stated that I harbour no hatred against Hichilema. What I hate is his bad leadership, whose meaning I have explained in the article below. There is no constitutional democracy in the world that requires citizens to love their elected leaders. Loving individuals is the responsibility of their spouses and family members. Once these individuals step up to hold elective public office, we owe them one thing: accountability or feedback on their performance. No elected public leader or their supporter should burden me or another person with any demand for affirmation or affection. In a functioning democracy, the duty of citizens is to hold their elected leaders to account so that they deliver basic services and do not undermine accountable democratic governance. This is what I have been doing across different administrations, including this one. As early as December 2021, when I analysed Hichilma's first 100 days in office, I raised governance concerns of his leadership in the hope that he could address them so that they do not grow into bigger problems. He did not listen. In 2022, when he was celebrating one year in office, I raised governance concerns of his leadership in the hope that he could address them so that they do not grow into bigger problems. He did not listen. In 2023, I raised governance concerns of his leadership in the hope that he could address them so that they do not grow into bigger problems. He did not listen. In 2024, I raised governance concerns of his leadership in the hope that he could address them so that they do not grow into bigger problems. He did not listen. In fact, as did his predecessor in 2021 in response to my criticism of the abuse of state institutions to fix critics and opponents, the president asked his supporters to report me to the police for alleged hate speech against him! In 2025, I raised governance concerns of his leadership in the hope that he could address them so that they do not grow into bigger problems. He did not listen. This year and for the many reasons that I shared in the interview on the link below, Hichilema is losing the election because he did not listen to criticism that we, as citizens, raised about his performance. He is also losing the election because of his extremist supporters who, in addition to a wilful but harmful failure to hold him to account, dismiss legitimate criticism of his leadership from other people as hate speech. What a pity! What a wasted opportunity! I have just read a story on a ruling party platform casually dismissing Global Witness's report that "Ahead of Zambia's general election...First Quantum Minerals and its associates have been running a decades-long covert influence campaign distorting the copper-rich nation's democracy" and that the Canadian firm has "become his [Hichilema's] largest funder in the upcoming 2026 election after pledging up to $50 million in support." The report adds that "FQM has reaped enormous benefits: major changes to Zambia's tax regime have save the company $771 million between 2022 and 2025, and it has been shielded from legal scrutiny." Rather than interrogating these grave concerns, the publisher, the Zambian Watchdog which is run from State House, is treating the issue so casually when Global Witness, a very credible international outlet, raises serious corruption and governance allegations. In January 2019, I raised questions about Hichilema's relationship with foreign mining firms, but was told by his supporters that I just hate him. Today, we are ere. The net result is that Hichilema, who in opposition politics had positioned himself as the reformist leader Zambia needed to reclaim its democracy, eliminate corruption, unite the country, and set it on the path to economic recovery, has, in power, turned out to be nearly everything he detested about his predecessor and, in some cases, much worse. Under his watch, corruption has thrived on a massive scale, the economy is a shambles, ethnic divisions have worsened, Zambiaโ€™s previously principled foreign policy has been shredded into something unrecognisable, and democracy is essentially non-existent. The man who was expected to lead reform has instead transitioned into an aspiring despot. Unless he rigs the election, or eliminates his main rival, Zambians should prepare for a new administration after 13 August. Many voters have reached a point of no return and it is too late for Hichilema to change their mind. A combination of failure to listen and the "you just hate Hichilema" brigade has destroyed his once promising presidency. I see many people expressing surprise at the huge turnout at Brian Mundubile's rallies. What they miss is that the turnout reflects the revulsion against Hichilema rather than genuine support for Brian. Even if Brian was not there, voters would have rallied behind another candidate through which to express their opposition to Hichilema as a result of his major policy failures. As early as 2023, wen I noticed Hichilema's direction of travel, I warned that the greatest opposition that he and the UPND face is a politically alert and informed citizenry, not an opposition party: โ€œThe biggest opposition that Hichilema faces is the people, particularly if he fails to lower the cost of living and tackle the huge unemployment outside the health and education sectors. They can stop opposition rallies like Edgar Lungu and the PF tried to do but if Zambians would have decided in a year or two that Hichilema must go at the next election, there is nothing that he can do to stop them....Even if Hichilema tries to, he cannot stop the peopleโ€™s will. Even if he succeeds in killing the PF and in his manoeuvres to block his main political opponents from running in 2026, another platform and another candidate to serve as the outlet of opposition will be found. The voters will support any visionary patriot they see as better placed to be used as the vehicle for removing Hichilema just like they chose him as the vehicle for removing Lungu. Please tell himโ€. Hichilema did not listen. Again. This continued failure to listen prompted my conclusion two years later that "Many Zambians may not know yet who they will vote for in the 2026 presidential election, but they already know who they wonโ€™t vote for." The truth is that I tried to warn Hichilema in good time and at different points that he was heading in the wrong direction. The President, dripping with arrogance, did not listen. Think of it this way. A bus (representing a political party in power) is transporting passengers (active citizens) from Intercity terminus (2021, being the departure point of where we did not want to be anymore) to Nakonde (2026, being the arrival point of destination before subsequently deciding whether to book the same bus for the return trip). After leaving Intercity, some passengers notice that the bus is heading towards Livingstone (a wrong destination that takes us back to before 2021). A few of us (active citizens) decide to stand up (holding the leader to account) and confront both the driver (the president) and his conductor (Minister of Finance), demanding an explanation for why we are heading to Livingstone when we were promised that we woud be taken to Nakonde. Other passengers, mainly those who came from the ethnic group of the driver and conductor, defended the duo even before it could respond to our concerns. They repeatedly told us that "You just hate the driver. Please sit down!" One or two relatives of the conductor joined in support, saying the "The driver and the conductor are excellent and one of them has even won awards for stellar performance on his duties, including his remarkable capacity to understand direction of travel"! That is how some passengers kept quiet. I kept on talking, especially after we reached Choma in the hope that if we turned atthat point, we woudl not wast more time. I talked because I could not get off the bus at undesigned stations, so the only solution was to appeal to the driver to change course. I explained that it would be an act of extreme irresponsibility on my part as an active passenger to wait until the bus has reached Livingstone before holding the driver to account about the direction of travel. That is why I tried to warn the driver that we were headed in the wrong direction. Unfortunately, other passengers said we should just sit back comfortably, enjoy the ride which included some morsels of food delivered by the bus, and trust the driver because other drivers before him were much worse. In the end, we arrived in Livingstone, our undesired destination. Just when we were arriving, we saw another bus, loading passing from there directly to Nakonde. The driver, upon realising the cost of his failure to listen and the disappointment in the eyes of the passengers, urged everyone to sit down, promising that he would take us to Nakonde if we give him more time. With the exception of those who came from the driver's ethnic group and the auxiliary ones, most passengers, who had shown great faith in his driving skills by paying (voting) the fare for the bus as their mode of transport from Intercity to Nakonde, have left the bus for the other. These include those who had adopted silence during the journey after realising that the driver, aided by the choir mentioned, was not a listening kind. As I write this post, the alternative bus is almost full. The same passengers who accused those of us who, along the way, advised the driver to change course, of harbouring hatred for the driver are now wondering why nearly everyone is leaving the bus we came with for an alternative one that is promising to take us directly to Nakonde. One of the driver's supporters, reiterating the driver's earlier appeal that we should stick to the bus that brought us to Livingstone, just shouted at us a moment ago: "The alternative bus will take you to a wrong destination. Its driver cannot be trusted; just stick to this one because you won't have to pay a new fare". The supporter is overlooking the point that we are already at a wrong destination, the current driver has betrayed our trust, and that we would rather repose our trust in another person. It is not good to remain on a bus, driven by a person who does not listen, out of the fear that an alternative one might be driven by someone who could be worse. Let us try the alternative bus. If its driver takes us to a wrong destination, we will disembark from the bus we are about to jump onto, as we have done before, and find another one until we reach Nakonde. For me and other active passengers, such has been the the current driver's betrayal of our trust that we have reached a point of no return. We cannot trust this driver anymore, especially that when we tried to correct him, no one explained to us why our concerns were unfounded. We were just told that we hate hate the driver or his ethic group or or the province where he comes from. Recently, Dr Lee Habasonda, a lecturer in political science at the University of Zambia, told Reuters (watch the video clip on the link below) that electoral success is a matter of thresholds โ€“ of grievances, feelings, frustrations, etc. Leeโ€™s view is that once a certain threshold or tipping point has been reached, "no matter your manifesto, ideology, lies" or whatever those in power do or say, the voters will "decide to change government" because they would have reached a point of no return. Emotionally, many Zambian voters, including some that I know who voted for Hichilema in 2021, have passed that threshold where no matter what Hichilema or UPND does, these voters will reject him. This is because the threshold, or the point of no return, has been reached. As Lee argued, those in power "may say we have already won this election when they campaign but the political coalitions and realignment" suggest otherwise. When the opposition wins next month, we will need to advise them to get non-sycophants at State House and in the critical posts in the civil service. It is important that they understand that unless there is a clear shift away from the harmful culture we have raised concerns about, we will be compelled to challenge them with the same resolve we previously applied to both the PF and UPND governments. On my part, I promise that I will always be on the side of the people. You will not find me in government even after the election. Once Hichilema is out of office, I will leave him alone and my attention will shift to holding to account the next set of public leaders. As I made clear in 2021, I am content serving as an academic and I will work, as part of my civic duty, to hold the new Government to account as I did with previous Governments. I am not available for or interested in any form of government job. For now, Iet me continue listening to the attached song. Chalo chesu.

Sishuwa Sishuwa

30,736 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 14 Tagen

This was the same stream. I've typed whole novels explaining this in good faith. They aren't good faith they are looking for openings on Nick's ankle to bite. Its not worth arguing with them. We are at war with ZOG right now. They claim to be on the same team but spend every day shooting us in the back. Don't argue with them, just let them fuck up their stupid plans from behind a block. The only time these dudes get engagement is when they fuck with us and intentionally misunderstand and misconstrue a take. I want a White Christian America, clearly the groypers do. We are the tip of the spear in this war and these rats are more concerned with their own position in the hypothetical 4th Reich than they are actually winning, it is disgusting and selfish. It's even worse because all of his ideas are fucking stupid. I'm just so uninterested in this bullshit fake conversation. I know there are a lot of wns who have been in this forever and are in their 40s or older. You need to trust the plan and understand that while you may think the groypers are gay or talk like black people we are the generation who is leading this fight to levels we have never reached before. Regardless, we are currently grappling with ZOG, AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS, so maybe try to help. He has a video from a day ago talking with another of these losers about how the groyper strategy of infiltration wouldn't work even though we are literally in the middle of ZOG melting down over it working. I've been in this since I was fucking 16 years old I have seen an endless supply of these bitter idiots and I've really held out as long as I can trying to be good faith and handhold them through it, but its just transparently bad faith. If you are attacking groypers right now, you're on team Israel. Sorry, that's just real life. Your plan to start a white commune is stupid and a waste of time. I think the whole country should be a white commune. There are already plenty of racist little towns in rural America. But when the federal government comes to rape them with migrants, they have no reply. Your plan to start a "based" brick and morter prep school is stupid and a massive liability to anyone who attends. Even with one second of thinking a guerilla, online prep school is a better and far cheaper idea. But honestly, wignat U is completely unnecessary because we have online shows and resources already available, and more is being made every day. What the fuck. I didn't say anything about this or your porn videos and just tried to support you when you were being attacked. Because I value winning over making sure everyone knows I'm the most basedest person on Twitter and I should be in charge. I'm typing this whole novel now because I hope there are some older gen wn guys who are actually good faith. It's just a genuine appeal to groypers to just block these dudes and stop giving them 90% of their engagement, and to the anti-groyper wns who actually want to win. Maybe you don't understand why the young people act this way, but we are the most zealous and numerous soldiers and we are fucking winning. We are either a team or we aren't. You're on our side or Israel's side. Do not believe there is an alternative, believe you can guide and assist this movement with your wisdom and turbo based takes. If your name is WODANWIGNAT and you hate Jesus and love whites, it means nothing if you join the chorus of Jewish voices against the only white youth movement you've got.

Alexander Augustine

184,656 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 9 Monaten

I donโ€™t care about your politics anymore. I really donโ€™t. If youโ€™re still justifying ICEโ€™s actions youโ€™re done. That isnโ€™t a disagreement anymore, thatโ€™s a moral failure. The claim that Alex Pretti, a 37 year old ICU nurse, was aggressive or that he was there to kill officers is not just false, itโ€™s evil. Itโ€™s a deliberate lie. Kristi Noem repeating it isnโ€™t confusion or poor judgment, itโ€™s a malicious lie. This is the same woman with a documented history of cruelty and dishonesty, and now sheโ€™s in charge of Homeland Security. That should terrify everyone! If J.D. Vance and Trumpโ€™s team donโ€™t cut her loose, they risk losing their base. This isnโ€™t just Democrats anymore Republican supporters are fed up too. Iโ€™ve said this before and Iโ€™ll say it again: no one was ever opposed to deporting illegal immigrants, whether criminals or non-criminals. The justification was always public safety removing people who harm others, who commit violence, who kill. That was the idea! But now the very force that was supposed to protect the public is killing and harming American citizens! At that point, the distinction collapses. If an innocent American is killed, it makes no difference whether the trigger is pulled by a gang member or a federal agent. The outcome is the same: death, fear, and destruction, and I would argue it is even worst when your own is killing. The Trump administration has failed catastrophically with ICE and with Kristi Noem. And letโ€™s be very clear about whatโ€™s happening. This is how authoritarianism starts. You give intelligence agencies and private contractors like Palantir powers they should never have and you're doomed. You normalize armed federal agents patrolling American streets. You lie about killings that are caught on camera. Then you label citizens โ€œdomestic terroristsโ€ to justify it. First itโ€™s immigrants. Then itโ€™s protesters. Then itโ€™s journalists. Then itโ€™s you. Mark my words. It will be you! Weโ€™ve already seen it twice in two weeks. Alex a 37 years old, an ICU nurse at the VA, no criminal record, no violence and he was shot and killed, Just like Renee Good before him. Both were American citizens. Both were immediately smeared by the government as violent extremists. The videos are clear. Alex was filming something every American has the right to do. He approached no one aggressively. He was holding a phone. He was pepper-sprayed for no good reason. His legally carried firearm was removed by ICE. We have second amendment rights in this country, we can exercise them if we want to and honestly - in this American, seems to me we should do it daily! Only after he was disarmed and on the ground did an agent shoot him multiple times, in the back.And yet top officials Kristi Noem, Stephen Miller, Greg Bovino went on camera and flat out lied. Not misspoke. Lied. they claimed he was ready to kill ICE officers. This is an attack on American peoples and their rights with bunch of lazy hater in uniforms. If the shooting were justified,they wouldnโ€™t need to fabricate a story, they would not need to make things up.This is what should outrage everyone, regardless of where you stand on immigration or ICE. A government that lies this brazenly. When video evidence is available to anyone is a government that believes it no longer needs public consent to do anything.That is dangerous. There is no democracy in this country but at least we were always able to push back, now we have these people who think they are above the law everywhere. In foreign policy and oil, and in domestic policy too, I bet theyโ€™re about to learn their lesson. Iโ€™ve spoken to many cops who have pushed back against ICE officers, confronted them, and openly criticized them. Because at the end of the day, cops are regular Americans. They live in our neighborhoods, care about people and public safety, and took an oath to protect. Now theyโ€™re defending Americans, standing with them against these brainless haters in uniforms and that is something we should be proud of. As the daughter of a detective, I am extremely proud of these cops who are pushing back and protecting citizens. ICE is unprofessional; they are poorly trained, scared, and operating on hate nothing more. Thatโ€™s something you see in North Korea not in this country. Enough is enough! Republican especially, should be alarmed. For years, the right warned against armed federal agents patrolling American streets. Waco, ruby ridge, DHS itself was controversial when it was created. The second amendment was defended precisely as a safeguard against government overreach. Hereโ€™s the new standard in America: if you are legally carrying a firearm, even if you never touch it, never threaten anyone, never break the law the government can label you a terrorist and kill you. Even if you are an American citizen. And the hypocrisy is staggering. These are the same people who screamed nonstop to free Kyle Rittenhouse, defending the principle that legal firearm possession or use in defence does not equal criminal intent. But now that ordinary Americans who fit that same standard are standing in front of them, theyโ€™ve completely reversed course. Suddenly, legal gun ownership is enough to justify lethal force. Iโ€™ve always been clear about this: when Trump is right on policy be it domestic or foreign, I give him credit, I support him fully. Iโ€™m not driven by blind loyalty so when he is wrong I speak up just as quickly and honestly. But this crosses a line. If the government can kill you for exercising a constitutional right without action, without threat, without due process, then the right itself no longer exists. That is not law and order. That is tyranny. If thatโ€™s the rule now, the second amendment is dead. What we are seeing is not law enforcement, itโ€™s power without accountability. And history is very clear about where that road leads. More on my YouTube link in the Bio.

ELIZABETH LANE

49,820 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 6 Monaten

๐Ÿ”บ Rising Lionโ€™s 2nd week ๐Ÿ”บ Iran goes for civilians ๐Ÿ”บ 1 drone out of 1000 ๐Ÿ”บ Khamenei threatens ๐Ÿ”บ Special guest: Israelโ€™s next move ๐Ÿ”บ Middle East Report / Saturday, June 21 ๐Ÿ”บ Itโ€™s been one week since Israel launched Operation Rising Lion with the goal of dismantling Iranโ€™s nuclear project and ballistic missile infrastructure. 2 nights ago, for the first and only time in a week, I slept through the nightโ€”thanks to the extraordinary efforts of Israeli Air Force pilots and the intelligence apparatus operating above Iran. Between Thursday and Friday only one missile was fired, landing in a parking lot in Beโ€™er Sheva. Three additional launchers were neutralized before they could be used. The number of Iranian launches is dwindlingโ€”not because Iran has abandoned its thirst for revenge, but because it's running out of means. ๐Ÿ”บ Thursday night once again proved the strategic importance of a preemptive strike. As we saw on October 7, surprise disorients the enemy, paralyzes decision-making, and grants the attacker invaluable momentum. Hamas enjoyed its surprise for about 24 hoursโ€”but still shows no regret. Israel, however, continues to crush Iranian military infrastructure from 1,500 kilometers away. But letโ€™s be clear: Iran has not surrendered. It has merely shifted tactics, operating now more like a terror groupโ€”firing the minimum number of missiles to remain in the game while stalling for time and hoping someone else saves the regime from collapse. ๐Ÿ”บ The Middle East Report was created to provide a concise summary of regional developments based on a wide array of sources plus my own insights. But itโ€™s always valuable to hear alternative perspectives. Thatโ€™s why I invited British military analyst Andrew Fox to weigh in on three questions I had. I'm grateful he agreedโ€”keep reading for his eye-opening take. ๐Ÿ”บ America Ramps Up in the Middle East The U.S. continues to bolster its regional postureโ€”first deploying dozens of aerial refueling aircraft and 2 aircraft carriers (USS Nimitz and USS Ford), then fighter squadrons, and now even fearsome B-2 bombers capable of carrying the massive MOP bunker-buster, designed to penetrate deep into hardened facilities like Iranโ€™s Fordow enrichment site. Meanwhile, the UK is still weighing its options, but the HMS Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier was spotted passing through the Suez Canal eastward. France, predictably, would prefer Israel to stop fightingโ€”hoping to avoid unrest among its own Muslim population. Nothing new. Will the U.S. join the fight? I have no idea. American politics isnโ€™t my field. But the level of coordination, the tone in which the administration talks, and the unwavering support for Israel suggest Washington is aiming to bring Iran to its kneesโ€”either through psychological warfare, acting the โ€œbad copโ€, or direct force. ๐Ÿ”บ The Numbers Tell the Story So far, Iran has fired ~520 missiles at Israel. About 90% were intercepted by Israelโ€™s missile defense systems. Another 5% landed harmlessly in open areas. Only ~25 missiles (mere 5%) hit their targetsโ€”tragically causing civilian casualties and huge damage. Only 25. On average, it takes over 20 missiles to kill one Israeli. Even Hamas is more effective. Iran also launched over 1,000 UAVs at Israeli territory; only one of them hit (on an empty house in Beit Sheโ€™an, just hours ago). What a staggering waste of resources. To date, 24 civilians have been killed by Iranian attacks, including four Arab family members in Tamra, five Ukrainian family members who came to Israel for medical care, two elderly spouses killed when a missile directly struck their protected room. No soldiers. No army bases. No aircraft, ship, or command post. Only civilians. Thanks to Israelโ€™s home-front readinessโ€”reinforced rooms, shelters, clear civil defense instructions, and a disciplined publicโ€”the death toll is far lower than it could have been. Israel is the only country in the world where every new building must include a fortified room. Meanwhile, in Gaza, Hamas hides in tunnels while civilians have no protection at all. Iranian rockets struck residential towers, destroyed years of research at the Weizmann Institute, and damaged hospital wings at Soroka Medical Center in Beโ€™er Sheva. Today they managed to hit a mosque in Haifa and a Christian home for children with disabilities, and caused havoc in a Bedouin (Muslim) town in the south. Iran is no longer fighting for military victoryโ€”it is aiming only to terrorize and destroy, but after 77 years of existential threats, Israel is not so easily rattled. ๐Ÿ”บ Striking Iranโ€™s Regime In response to continued attacks on Israeli civilian infrastructure, Israel has escalated strikes against key regime symbols in Iranโ€”targeting police headquarters, Revolutionary Guard bases, and internal security networks. These forces are central to suppressing domestic dissent, and weakening them aims to destabilize the regime's grip on power. In response, Tehran has cut off internet access entirely to prevent images of unrest from spreading and to paralyze opposition groups. Opposition forces are slowly joining in. For example, the Shahโ€™s Air Force Pilotsโ€™ Union, a pre-revolutionary group, issued a call to the Iranian military to abandon the regime and side with the people. Meanwhile, an Israeli cyber group successfully targeted Iranโ€™s cryptocurrency exchange NOBITEX, a key mechanism used by the regime to circumvent sanctions. Foreign reports indicate the exchangeโ€™s holdings dropped from $1.8 billion to just $100 million. Oops. ๐Ÿ”บ What About Hezbollah? Iranโ€™s most prominent proxy, Hezbollah, has mostly stuck to empty threats. While it still possesses advanced launch capabilities and tens of thousands of fighters, the group is weak, isolated, and lacks popular and governmental support. Lebanese Christian political leader Samir Geagea, publicly rebuked Hezbollah deputy leader Sheikh Naim Qassem, saying: "You are not entitled to act unilaterally. If you have proposals, bring them to the government. This isnโ€™t a country where everyone acts on their own." Israelโ€™s defense minister fired back: โ€œThe Hezbollah Secretary General continues to act on Tehranโ€™s orders. He should understandโ€”Israel has lost patience with terrorists. If terrorism persistsโ€”Hezbollah will cease to exist.โ€ If Hezbollah truly believed Iran would prevail, theyโ€™d already be in the fight. But who bets on the losing side? Better to short Iran and profit. ๐Ÿ”บ Iranโ€™s Leaders Speakโ€”From the Shadows On Wednesday, Iranโ€™s Supreme Leader, speaking from hiding, declared: "Our nation will not forget its martyrsโ€™ blood and will not sit idly by as our airspace is violated. The Zionist entity has made a grave mistakeโ€”and it will suffer the consequences. The Americans must understand: Iran cannot be subdued. Any military interference will bring irreversible damage." Then on Friday morning, after that single missile hit the parking lot in Beโ€™er Sheva, the Supreme Leader posted a defiant tweet: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi maintained a diplomatic front: โ€œThe U.S. approached us for negotiationsโ€”we refused. We will not negotiate while aggression continues (rings a bell? It's the same tactic used by Hamas, which Israel politely ignores). We will not discuss our missile program with anyone.โ€ This reminds me of Exodus 7:3 - "And I will harden Pharaoh's heart, and multiply my signs and my wonders in the land of Egypt." Every dog has his day. ๐Ÿ”บ Iranโ€™s Image Crisis Iranโ€™s greatest fear is losing face. The regime cannot admit weaknessโ€”it fears the domino effect this might trigger among its proxies and adversaries across the region. But when ego overrides strategy, bad decisions follow. Thatโ€™s why I turned to Andrew Fox Andrew Fox, a respected British military thinker, to provide an outside perspective. Andrew is a former British airborne officer, a Middle East expert, and a fellow at the Henry Jackson Society (Henry Jackson Society). Since the beginning of the war, Andrew has stood with Israel, not because heโ€™s Jewish or Israeli (heโ€™s not) but because he hates injustice, and he recognizes how the Palestinian psychological warfare is waged against Israel and even against Jews all over the world. Heโ€™s been to Israel countless times and has seen things first handedly here and in Gaza. Iโ€™m grateful he agreed to share his thoughts. Q1: In hindsight, what could Israel have done better in the first week of the war? A: Militarily, Israelโ€™s opening strikes were highly effective. Tactically, it could not have gone much better. My one concern is that Israel might have started a job it does not have the capability to finish - destroying the entirety of the nuclear programme is a huge challenge. Everyone fixates on Fordow but there are other underground facilities that will be challenging to strike from the air without American involvement. Shaldag (an IAF commando unit, specializing in intelligence gathering and striking deep inside the enemy's territory - IA) may be able to destroy Fordow with a raid, but other sites present a similar challenge. Q2: If Iran tries to wait Israel out like Hamas did, whatโ€™s Israelโ€™s wild card? A: Israel needs to shift from attrition to strategic paralysis. Cyber warfare could cripple Iranโ€™s command systems and public infrastructure without more civilian deaths. Covertly supporting restive minorities could stretch the regime internally. And a second wave of targeted strikes against political and clerical elites might fracture Tehranโ€™s inner circle. Paired with a serious diplomatic off-ramp, thatโ€™s how Israel forces real concessions. Q3: Could Iran use chemical weapons as a last resort? A: Itโ€™s unlikely but not impossible. Iran has the knowledge and possibly the stockpiles, though it denies both. Using chemical warheads would be suicidal: it would provoke massive Israeli (and potentially US) retaliation, destroy Iranโ€™s diplomatic support, and risk internal backlash. The only scenario where they might consider it is if the regime believes itโ€™s days from collapse. Until then, itโ€™s more of a deterrent than a realistic option. Follow Andrew on - highly recommended. ๐Ÿ”บ As we enter the second week of the war with Iran, letโ€™s remember: just two weeks ago, Greta Thunberg was dominating headlines from the Middle East. An entire report without once mentioning Gaza? Things are hectic and we have tough days ahead of us. Pray for the safety of Israeli soldiers and civilians. And always rememberโ€”the eternal people are not afraid of a long journey. For those who might have forgotten, see the amazing video (who made it? Please share!). Speakers on. Shabbat Shalom ๐Ÿ™๐ŸŒธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ’ช ************************************* Reached the bottom of the Middle East Report? Donโ€™t forget to follow the Chief Hasbara Officer ๐Ÿ˜˜ Please share, like, follow and help others get the news... see you all in the next report. ************************************* #Syria #Houthis #Yemen #Lebanon #Israel #Hamas #Hezbollah #Iran #Gaza #BringThemHome #TimeToSurrender

Itamar Avni / Chief Hasbara Officer

36,732 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr

๐Ÿšจ OPERATIONAL UPDATE: ISRAEL U.S. WAR WITH THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC - Reporting Window: LAST 24 HOURS โ€ข Iran widened its fire again with a broad evening missile barrage on central Israel and continued attacks across the Gulf, including a drone strike that hit a fuel tank at Kuwait International Airport โ€ข Israel intensified strikes across Iran, with reported hits in Tehran, Qazvin and Alborz industrial areas, plus continued pressure on missile infrastructure and launch cells โ€ข Hezbollah kept the northern front active, including a direct rocket hit on a building in Kiryat Shmona, while Israel deepened its Lebanon campaign and Katz publicly framed the objective as a security zone up to the Litani โ€ข The diplomatic track moved forward, but only in the strangest possible way: Trump says talks are progressing, Iran still publicly denies direct negotiations, and multiple reports now point to JD Vance as Tehranโ€™s preferred American interlocutor โ€ข The big picture is unchanged: the war is still live on every major front, but the center of gravity is shifting toward a contest over how it ends, who gets to define victory, and whether the Gulf will stay adjacent to the war or be pulled fully into it The most important thing to understand about the last 24 hours is that this was not a quiet period masked by negotiations. It was the opposite. The battlefield remained active from Tehran to southern Lebanon to Kuwait, even as Washington and Tehran edged further into a murky negotiation channel. That is what gives the last day its character: not de escalation, but simultaneous escalation and diplomacy, both moving at once. Open source reporting reflects the same picture, with repeated indications of strikes in Tehran and Qazvin, attacks near Baghdad airport, a Kuwait airport fuel fire, and a large Iranian barrage toward central Israel late in the window. **Special thanks to Michael W for your continued contribution to the open-source intel picture behind these updates. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿš€ IRANIAN MISSILE FIRE ON ISRAEL Iran kept up the pressure on Israel in two different ways over this window. Earlier in the cycle, a cluster warhead strike wounded nine people in Bnei Brak, with additional damage in Petah Tikva, while Hezbollah fire from Lebanon killed a woman near Mahanayim Junction and wounded several more in Kiryat Shmona. Later, near the end of the reporting window, Iran launched another broad barrage toward central Israel, with warnings stretching across Gush Dan, Sharon, Wadi Ara, Samaria, Judea and the Dead Sea region. Open source reporting you provided tracked that second wave in real time, showing how broad the alert footprint was even though initial reports indicated no immediate casualties from that specific evening barrage. This is what stands out operationally: Iranโ€™s missile campaign is not gone, but it looks increasingly built around selective disruption rather than the huge opening barrages of the war. The salvos are still dangerous, still capable of civilian casualties and still capable of producing visually dramatic and politically effective moments, but they are landing against a backdrop of steadily intensifying strikes on Iranโ€™s launch network. That makes each successful hit feel more deliberate and more strategic. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” โœˆ๏ธ THE AIR CAMPAIGN OVER IRAN KEPT MOVING Israelโ€™s strike campaign inside Iran also remained broad and geographically layered. Reuters reported renewed Israeli strikes as talks were being floated through intermediaries. Open source intelligence adds texture to that by showing repeated reporting from open source channels of impacts in eastern and western Tehran, the Alborz industrial zone in Qazvin province, and additional blasts reported across Khuzestan and other regions. There were also repeated reports of targeted assassination attempts in east Tehran, which fits the broader pattern of not just degrading launchers and production nodes, but also hunting the people tied to them. The color here matters. This no longer looks like a campaign limited to air defenses and obvious military compounds. The picture from the last 24 hours is of a system being pressed from multiple angles at once: missile depots, industrial support zones, launch crews, command elements and regime infrastructure in and around Tehran. Open source reporting reinforces that sense of breadth, especially the repeated references to Qazvin and Alborz secondary explosions and to ongoing heavy activity over Tehran. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” โšก THE ENERGY WAR IS STILL HOT The clearest new regional energy development in this window was Kuwait. Reuters reported that a drone attack hit a fuel tank at Kuwait International Airport, causing a fire but no casualties. That matters not because the material damage was catastrophic, but because it again shows Iran or Iran aligned actors reaching directly for civilian and logistical energy infrastructure in Gulf states. This was not an abstract threat anymore. It was a live strike on a functioning international hub. Your outbox tracked the same event quickly and repeatedly, alongside additional open source reporting about nearby attacks and power disruptions in Kuwait. At the same time, the diplomatic and military discussion around the Strait of Hormuz kept shaping everything else. Markets moved on talk of a U.S. proposal and possible hosted talks in Pakistan or Turkey. Oil eased on negotiation optimism, but the underlying structure of the crisis remains the same: Iran still retains the ability to disrupt shipping and energy confidence without fully โ€œclosingโ€ the Strait in a formal sense. That is why even modest signs of diplomacy can move oil sharply, and why even a localized drone strike in Kuwait still carries outsized weight. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‡ง LEBANON IS NOT A SIDESHOW The northern front kept boiling. Reuters reported that Israel now intends to occupy a swathe of southern Lebanon up to the Litani River, with Defense Minister Israel Katz explicitly describing a โ€œsecurity zoneโ€ concept. That is not rhetoric you use if you still think this is a short punitive phase. At the tactical level, Hezbollah continued to demonstrate that it can still impose costs, including a direct rocket hit on a building in Kiryat Shmona and earlier casualties in the north. Meanwhile, open source reporting pointed to Israeli strikes in Nabatieh, Rashidiya, Bchamoun and broader southern Lebanese infrastructure, which matches the picture of sustained pressure rather than episodic retaliation. The broader meaning is straightforward. Israel is signaling that if the Iran war ends inconclusively on the Iranian front, it does not intend to leave Hezbollahโ€™s northern threat structure intact and simply hope for the best. Lebanon is being shaped now as part of the endgame, not just the current fight. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ถ IRAQ STAYED ACTIVE TOO Iraq remained active in the background, but it should not be treated as background noise. Open source intel reporting includes repeated reporting on a targeted U.S. strike on a vehicle near Baghdad airport and continued militia related activity tied to U.S. positions and proxy structures. That comes after the prior cycleโ€™s major strikes on PMF and militia command nodes. It fits the larger pattern we have now seen for weeks: Iraq is not the main theater, but it is still one of the places where the war keeps trying to widen horizontally. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐ŸŒ THE NEGOTIATION TRACK GOT STRANGER, NOT CLEARER Trump is still publicly presenting the talks as real progress. Reuters reports that Pakistan conveyed a U.S. proposal, with Pakistan or Turkey possible venues, and that Washington has floated a broader framework dealing with nuclear capability, missiles and proxies. At the same time, Iran continues to publicly deny meaningful direct talks and has toughened its public stance, insisting on guarantees, compensation and no rollback of its missile deterrent. What makes the last 24 hours more interesting is the growing focus on who would even talk for the United States. Times of Israel and Jerusalem Post reporting both indicate that JD Vance is increasingly central to the diplomacy, with Tehran reportedly preferring him over Witkoff and Kushner. The diplomatic track here appears as both real and deeply unstable, with questions about who on the Iranian side actually holds authority and whether Washington is now seeking an end state short of outright regime collapse. That shift matters because it tells us something important: Washington increasingly seems to be searching for an off ramp that still looks like victory, while Israel and Gulf allies appear much less comfortable with ending this war before Iranโ€™s military and proxy architecture are degraded further. That tension is now one of the defining features of the conflict. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” ๐Ÿ“Œ WHAT MATTERS MOST RIGHT NOW 1๏ธโƒฃ The war is still fully active across multiple fronts Iran hit central Israel again, Kuwait airport was struck, Lebanon stayed hot and Israel kept pounding targets inside Iran. Negotiations did not replace combat. They were layered on top of it. 2๏ธโƒฃ The pressure on Iranโ€™s internal military system keeps deepening The accumulating pattern of strikes in Tehran, Qazvin, Alborz and other areas suggests a campaign that is still broadening the target set, not narrowing it. Open source reporting in your files strongly supports that picture. 3๏ธโƒฃ The diplomatic track is real, but it is not clean Trump is selling progress. Iran is denying direct talks. Vance is becoming more central. And nobody looking at the battlefield would conclude that the war is genuinely close to stopping on its own. โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ” BOTTOM LINE The last 24 hours painted a clearer picture than some of the recent reporting windows. This is no longer just a war of salvos and counterstrikes. It is now a war over end states. Iran is still trying to prove it can widen the cost map, not just hit Israel but keep the Gulf under pressure too. Israel is still trying to prove that sustained, system level degradation inside Iran can continue even while diplomacy swirls overhead. And Washington is trying to find a formula that can stop the war without looking like it backed down. That is why the reporting feels different now. The battlefield is still violent, but the arguments over how this ends are becoming just as important as the strikes themselves.

Inside_Israel_Intel

23,818 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 4 Monaten

In a newly released technical update, SpaceX's leadership team, which includes communications manager Dan Huot, Director of Satellite Engineering Ian Dahl, and CEO Elon Musk, detailed a highly ambitious infrastructure roadmap to design, manufacture, and operate specialized artificial intelligence computing satellites at scale. Positioned as a major strategic pillar to dramatically elevate civilizational energy and processing capacity on the Kardashev scale, this strategy moves past traditional communications architectures into massive orbital server arrays. Here is the complete breakdown of the core technologies and timelines driving this space-based intelligence revolution: ๐Ÿ›ฐ๏ธ AI1 satellite power and compute capacity Ian Dahl and Elon Musk introduced the baseline performance targets for the first-generation AI1 satellite, explaining how its custom hardware is engineered to operate like an orbital data center server rack. Ian Dahl noted that their direct operational experience with xAI guided them to target a 150-kilowatt peak power capacity. To manage active machine learning workloads continuously, Elon Musk explained that the satellite is optimized to maintain a sustained average compute power envelope of 120 kilowatts, which directly mirrors the real-world performance of a terrestrial NVIDIA server rack. The official presentation slides outline several key operational metrics for this payload configuration: โšก The custom architecture delivers a 150 kW peak compute payload. ๐Ÿ”‹ The system maintains a 120 kW sustained average compute payload under active workloads. โš–๏ธ The hardware achieves a highly optimized power-to-weight density of 70 kW per ton. ๐Ÿ”„ The layout features a completely interchangeable compute provider design. "We thought that the right place to start is around the 150 kilowatt peak power level. But as we look at the workloads with our experience with xAI, we see that we can support about 120 kilowatts of average compute. The 150 kilowatt peak power level roughly matches what, say, an NVIDIA GV300 rack would do. A more reasonable operating envelope would be around 120 kilowatts average power, but it can peak up to 150. So it is basically thinking about it as a rack of compute in space." --- ๐Ÿ“ AI1 satellite dimensions and thermal efficiency specs Elon Musk detailed the physical layout of the AI1 satellite, highlighting the massive dimensions required to accommodate its immense power and cooling hardware. He shared specific design criteria, explaining that the engineering relies on a custom 150 kW solar array paired with a high-capacity deployable liquid radiator thermal management system. The technical specifications of this vehicle layout include: ๐Ÿ“ The structural frame features a massive 70-meter wingspan. โ†•๏ธ The vehicle spans a total deployed height of 20 meters. โ˜€๏ธ The onboard solar array delivers an efficiency of 250 W/mยฒ using technology manufactured in Bastrop, Texas. ๐ŸŒก๏ธ The thermal system utilizes a 110 mยฒ deployable liquid radiator to cleanly dump waste heat. ๐Ÿ”„ The cooling architecture incorporates redundant pumping loops for mission safety. ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ The exterior contains integrated micrometeoroid shielding to protect the fluid lines. ๐Ÿงญ The double-sided radiators achieve a dissipation rate of 1400 watts per square meter while remaining oriented knife-edge to the sun. "The assumptions here are 250 watts per square meter for the solar array and about 1400 watts per square meter for the radiators. The radiators are double-sided, radiating on both sides, and they're oriented knife-edge to the sun. They have about a 70-meter wingspan, so these are fairly large." --- ๐Ÿงฉ Simplified design architecture built on Starlink V3 tech Elon Musk explained that despite the satellite's imposing size, its internal architecture is fundamentally much simpler than a standard Starlink satellite. Because it lacks heavy phased array and parabolic communications antennas, the entire vehicle layout is completely streamlined around a few essential structural modules: ๐ŸŽ›๏ธ The hardware framework is arranged around a centralized compute module. โ˜€๏ธ Large deployable solar arrays extend outward to capture orbital energy. ๐ŸŒก๏ธ A deployable liquid-radiator thermal management system controls active operational temperatures. ๐Ÿ”„ The engineering team heavily leverages the component evolution and manufacturing experience gained from developing the Starlink V3 vehicle platform. "The AI satellite is actually much simpler than a Starlink satellite. A Starlink satellite has gigantic phased array antennas, parabolic antennas, and a lot of laser links, making it much more complicated. An AI satellite is essentially a lot of solar cells, a radiator, and you still need some laser links, but you don't have all of the super complex antennas that you have on a Starlink satellite. A lot of this is technology we've already made for the Starlink V3 satellites." --- ๐Ÿ”Œ Interchangeable compute reference designs and high connectivity Elon Musk outlined a modular hardware approach for the satellite's payload, allowing it to house a variety of industry-standard processing units depending on client requirements. This interchangeable compute rack is supported by a high-bandwidth connectivity loop that links separate orbital units together or transmits data directly back to Earth. The core network parameters include: ๐Ÿง  Reference designs are fully established to seamlessly accommodate NVIDIA Reuben chips. ๐Ÿ’พ The system architecture is built to support alternative setups using NVIDIA GB300 chips. ๐Ÿ’ป Custom hardware layouts are explicitly designed to integrate Google TPUs. ๐ŸŒ The onboard communications setup delivers roughly 1 terabit of laser link connectivity. โฑ๏ธ The network closes the communication loop directly with the main Starlink constellation at an ultra-low latency of only 3 milliseconds. "Our current reference design is for NVIDIA Reuben chips, or it could be either GB300 or Reuben chips. We'll also have a reference design for TPUs. Essentially, you can put up any existing chips into orbit. There would also be probably something on the order of a terabit of laser link connectivity from the satellite. Then you can connect these racks of compute to each other by the laser links or directly to the Starlink constellations. Light travels 300 kilometers per millisecond, so that's about three milliseconds away." --- ๐Ÿญ The "gigasat" AI satellite and solar production hub in Bastrop, Texas Dan Huot highlighted that the primary production hub for this entire hardware ecosystem is anchored at their sprawling complex in Bastrop, Texas, officially designated as the Gigasat factory. Elon Musk verified that construction is already actively underway on the solar manufacturing facility to feed the project's supply line, with plans moving forward to construct the adjacent AI satellite assembly lines. The physical footprint and timeline of this manufacturing hub are defined by the following benchmarks: ๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ The company has over 1,000 acres of land currently owned or under contract for the site. ๐Ÿข The manufacturing complex boasts a massive structural building potential exceeding 11 million square feet. โš™๏ธ The facility will vertically integrate production to manufacture solar ingots, wafers, solar cells, and completed AI satellites. ๐Ÿ“… Both the solar and AI satellite production lines are targeted to be operational at a viable volume by the end of next year. "We're going to be building a lot of satellites and we're going to be building them here in Bastrop. We already have the solar manufacturing facility under construction, and then we will be building out the AI sat production building soon. We expect to have the AI sat production, the solar production, and all of that operating at some reasonable volume by the end of next year." --- ๐Ÿข The 100-million-square-foot "terafab" chip factory Elon Musk revealed a massive, long-term scaling strategy to build an immense chip manufacturing facility dubbed the "terafab" to completely bypass global semiconductor volume constraints. This manufacturing infrastructure is designed to transition the company into next-generation industrial scaling by producing highly specialized computing components at an unprecedented volume. The scale of this infrastructure project is defined by several extraordinary engineering and production benchmarks: ๐Ÿญ The colossal factory is projected to span approximately 100 million square feet, making it ten times larger than the current Tesla Gigafactory Texas. โšก The facility is structurally engineered to achieve a massive manufacturing output of 1 terawatt per year once fully operational. ๐Ÿ“ฆ This unprecedented physical footprint provides the capacity required to manufacture 1 billion full-reticle equivalent chips annually. ๐Ÿ”Œ Each individual chip manufactured by the facility is designed to run at a power capacity of 1 kilowatt. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ The total scaled output of the facility represents an energy footprint that is exactly double the current annual electricity consumption of the entire United States. "In order to get to the next order of magnitude, you need a gigantic chip factory. To give you a sense of scale here, we expect that the terafab is going to be around 100 million square feet, which is 10 times the size of the Tesla Gigafactory Texas. From a logic die standpoint, that's like having a billion chips per year with a kilowatt per reticle, scaling to a terawatt per year. That is twice the current electricity consumption of the United States." --- ๐Ÿ“ถ Next-generation high-volume Starlink terminals Dan Huot and Elon Musk introduced their next-generation Starlink user terminals, which have been redesigned specifically to achieve massive manufacturing throughput. Elon Musk pointed out that these newer models will be produced in vastly higher volumes than current hardware designs to fulfill their long-term global deployment targets: ๐Ÿ“ˆ The upgraded user hardware is manufactured at a much higher volume capacity than existing units. ๐ŸŒ The company's ultimate target is to successfully deploy a few hundred million of these next-generation terminals worldwide. "In fact, these are the new Starlink terminals, which we made in much higher volume than the current terminals. Ultimately, we think there's probably going to be a few hundred million Starlink terminals out there." --- ๐Ÿ“ˆ Aspirational timeline for orbital AI compute scaling Elon Musk laid out an ambitious, multi-year execution timeline detailing how the company plans to progressively scale space-based processing power. The roadmap targets an initial run-rate by the end of next year and sets an aggressive pace to increase total operational capacity sequentially through a structured, multi-phase timeline: 1๏ธโƒฃ The initial target aims to hit an annualized run-rate of 1 gigawatt of space AI compute by the end of next year. 2๏ธโƒฃ The capacity scales to an annualized rate of 10 gigawatts within the next two and a half years. 3๏ธโƒฃ The operational envelope expands to reach 100 gigawatts in three and a half years. 4๏ธโƒฃ The long-term deployment plan scales directly to a full terawatt capacity per year using the output of the terafab. "The goal is to get to roughly an annualized rate of a gigawatt per year by the end of next year in terms of space AI compute. Then aspirationally, we want to scale that by an order of magnitude per year. In two and a half years, hitting an annualized rate of 10 gigawatts a year in space, and in three and a half years, maybe a hundred gigawatts, going beyond that with the terafab to scale to a terawatt per year." --- ๐ŸŒ• Ultimate scaling via lunar production and mass drivers Elon Musk explained that scaling three orders of magnitude past a single terawatt forces a transition completely off-planet to avoid the logistical penalty of Earth's deep gravity well. The vision relies on establishing manufacturing infrastructure directly on the moon to leverage localized resource loops and zero-atmosphere physics: ๐ŸŒ™ The company plans to establish localized raw production lines on the moon to fabricate solar panels, photovoltaics, and radiators from lunar materials. โšก Manufacturing components locally avoids the massive fuel and mass penalties of transporting heavy structural materials from Earth. ๐Ÿงฒ Because the moon has no atmosphere and only one-sixth of Earth's gravity, the facility will utilize an electromagnetic mass driver to launch completed satellites. ๐Ÿš€ Operating essentially as a linear electric motor rail gun, this mechanism will shoot fully assembled AI satellites straight into deep space without relying on chemical rockets. "The only way that we can really see that you can achieve that is on the moon with a mass driver, essentially where you do local production of photovoltaics, solar panels, and radiators on the moon. Because the moon has no atmosphere and only one-sixth Earth's gravity, you can accelerate the AI satellites into deep space without a rocket. You can basically shoot them into space using an electromagnetic gun, like a rail gun typeโ€”it's basically a linear electric motor."

Ming

22,203 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Monat