Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Daniel Day-Lewis says most people talking about method acting have no idea what they're talking about "all the recent commentary the last few years about method acting is invariably from people that have little or no understanding of what it actually involves" "it's almost if it's like some specious... show more

Ren Clips

1,209 subscribers

163,331 просмотров • 20 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Искусство Образование

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 14

Фото профиля JohnO

JohnO20 дней назад

It's giving Kirk Lazarus

Фото профиля John C

John C20 дней назад

Fyi: If you aren't an actor, your takes on acting are irrelevant.

Фото профиля Morgs

Morgs20 дней назад

Love the man, but he made people push him around, lift him, and fucking FEED HIM on the set of My Left Foot so frankly he doesn’t get to say “You’re wrong about method acting!” 😂

Фото профиля TBR 🇺🇸

TBR 🇺🇸20 дней назад

Well, he is the goat.

Фото профиля T r u s t F i l m s

T r u s t F i l m s20 дней назад

He's s such an overrated bore A supposedly grown man who pretends to be someone else for a living. Sad

Фото профиля M . Tanveer 🇮🇳

M . Tanveer 🇮🇳20 дней назад

Perfect Answer.

Фото профиля Dimitri Athanitis

Dimitri Athanitis20 дней назад

He is right! All methods are trash. High performances are only in great films, only driven by talented directors. Most of the known actors never had that chance. (Possesion, Adjani by Zulawsky)

Фото профиля Ute Maria Laufs

Ute Maria Laufs20 дней назад

Stumbling and exchanging no arguments will people not persuade.

Фото профиля Not Pepe Silvia

Not Pepe Silvia20 дней назад

is he about to play Maynard in a movie?

Фото профиля Winifred Overstreet

Winifred Overstreet20 дней назад

He's 100% correct.

Фото профиля Ayatollah Nardallah Ruhossatti

Ayatollah Nardallah Ruhossatti20 дней назад

It's high time for the power that be to finally release that baldness treatment that they sadistically denied to humanity.

Фото профиля AppleVenus

AppleVenus17 дней назад

Wait, is that DDL? Holy crap.

Фото профиля lancelotlink

lancelotlink20 дней назад

Also……it’s stupid….

Фото профиля GribbenSW

GribbenSW20 дней назад

oh what would he know😆

Похожие видео

Daniel Day-Lewis admits that if method acting gets in the way of co-stars, the actor has failed "Method acting has suddenly got a bad rap and seems to be a pretty easy target, mostly for people that really know very little about it." "It's a way of working like any other way of working." "If it interferes with other people's work, you've gone wrong. Try something else."

Daniel Day-Lewis admits that if method acting gets in the way of co-stars, the actor has failed "Method acting has suddenly got a bad rap and seems to be a pretty easy target, mostly for people that really know very little about it." "It's a way of working like any other way of working." "If it interferes with other people's work, you've gone wrong. Try something else."

Chuks

180,624 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Daniel Day Lewis says Brian Cox has no idea what he’s saying about “method acting,” and just talking nonsense. “I just don’t like method being misrepresented.” “They focus on, ‘he lived in a jail cell for 6 months.’ Those are least important details. What the f*ck, you know?” Brian Cox thinks that "Method acting" — where actors stay in character even when the cameras are off is annoying and unnecessary. He famously criticized his Succession co-star, Jeremy Strong, for doing it and claimed that Strong learned this "tiring" habit from Daniel Day-Lewis. After years of silence, Day-Lewis fired back. He said Cox has been using his fame as a "soapbox" to talk nonsense about a technique he doesn't actually understand. He explains that his "Method" is actually very simple: it’s just a way to stay focused so that when he acts with others, he feels like a "living, breathing human being" instead of someone just reciting lines.

Daniel Day Lewis says Brian Cox has no idea what he’s saying about “method acting,” and just talking nonsense. “I just don’t like method being misrepresented.” “They focus on, ‘he lived in a jail cell for 6 months.’ Those are least important details. What the f*ck, you know?” Brian Cox thinks that "Method acting" — where actors stay in character even when the cameras are off is annoying and unnecessary. He famously criticized his Succession co-star, Jeremy Strong, for doing it and claimed that Strong learned this "tiring" habit from Daniel Day-Lewis. After years of silence, Day-Lewis fired back. He said Cox has been using his fame as a "soapbox" to talk nonsense about a technique he doesn't actually understand. He explains that his "Method" is actually very simple: it’s just a way to stay focused so that when he acts with others, he feels like a "living, breathing human being" instead of someone just reciting lines.

Movie Moments Analyst

75,080 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Black American says “Black fatigue is rampant” in America She talks about specific crimes and acts of violence “I can't believe that me saying that there's a violence problem in the Black community is seen as something that's like self-hating or racist — when you think of a culture that holds guns up to cameras and talks about it and romanticizes it, what culture do you think that is? Do you think that's white Americans that do that? No, it is Black Americans. That's not racist to say that. That's pointing out a problem. When you care about a group of people, when you have a child that's acting wrong and they're acting out, do you allow them to continue that behavior without pointing it out” “We're seeing it with our own eyes every day. We're seeing it. So, you know, say Black fatigue isn't a thing, say it's just racist. At the end of the day, if you don't want to point out something that is rampant and it's only going to increase and it's affecting younger and younger children and generations, then you don't care about the community. You're just worried about defending something that needs saving” Here are some harsh realities Black Americans make up only 12.6% of America but - Commit 55% of homicides - 29% of violent acts - Have a 6x homicide rate compared to whites - 30% of all EBT recipients are Black (remember they are only 13% of the whole population)

Black American says “Black fatigue is rampant” in America She talks about specific crimes and acts of violence “I can't believe that me saying that there's a violence problem in the Black community is seen as something that's like self-hating or racist — when you think of a culture that holds guns up to cameras and talks about it and romanticizes it, what culture do you think that is? Do you think that's white Americans that do that? No, it is Black Americans. That's not racist to say that. That's pointing out a problem. When you care about a group of people, when you have a child that's acting wrong and they're acting out, do you allow them to continue that behavior without pointing it out” “We're seeing it with our own eyes every day. We're seeing it. So, you know, say Black fatigue isn't a thing, say it's just racist. At the end of the day, if you don't want to point out something that is rampant and it's only going to increase and it's affecting younger and younger children and generations, then you don't care about the community. You're just worried about defending something that needs saving” Here are some harsh realities Black Americans make up only 12.6% of America but - Commit 55% of homicides - 29% of violent acts - Have a 6x homicide rate compared to whites - 30% of all EBT recipients are Black (remember they are only 13% of the whole population)

Wall Street Apes

61,949 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Matt Damon said some canceled people would have preferred an 18-month prison sentence because it has a clear end date. Joe Rogan: What we're talking about earlier about people that have been canceled, you know? That, that, this idea that one thing you said or one thing you did, and now we're going to exaggerate that to the fullest extent and cast you out of civilization. Matt Damon: In perpetuity, yeah. Joe Rogan: It's fucking crazy and it's... Matt Damon: Yeah, I would say because, because I bet some of those people would have preferred to go to jail for 18 months or whatever to, and, and then come out and say, "No, but I, that, that we can't... I, I paid my debt, like we're done." Yeah, like can we be done? Like, the, the thing about, about that, you know, getting kind of excoriated publicly like that, it's, it just never ends. And it's, and it's the first thing that, you know, it's just, it just will follow you to the grave, I think.

Matt Damon said some canceled people would have preferred an 18-month prison sentence because it has a clear end date. Joe Rogan: What we're talking about earlier about people that have been canceled, you know? That, that, this idea that one thing you said or one thing you did, and now we're going to exaggerate that to the fullest extent and cast you out of civilization. Matt Damon: In perpetuity, yeah. Joe Rogan: It's fucking crazy and it's... Matt Damon: Yeah, I would say because, because I bet some of those people would have preferred to go to jail for 18 months or whatever to, and, and then come out and say, "No, but I, that, that we can't... I, I paid my debt, like we're done." Yeah, like can we be done? Like, the, the thing about, about that, you know, getting kind of excoriated publicly like that, it's, it just never ends. And it's, and it's the first thing that, you know, it's just, it just will follow you to the grave, I think.

Ruzy.hl

82,786 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Former CIA Director John Brennan says the CIA pays people to be spies and then blackmails them He doesn’t consider it “Blackmail” because it’s about “National Security” “It's not blackmail. This is the security of the United States we're talking about” “Agents, the people that you recruit, foreign citizens, if they are hesitant to continue to spy for you, you can remind them that when they were first recruited and they signed a sheet of paper saying that they had taken some money from us, which is usually what happens, that you could remind them about that almost as a way to scare them into continuing to work with you. So the pressure — It sounds like blackmail — It's not blackmail. This is the security of the United States we're talking about. You have to do whatever you can in order to keep people working for the CIA.”

Former CIA Director John Brennan says the CIA pays people to be spies and then blackmails them He doesn’t consider it “Blackmail” because it’s about “National Security” “It's not blackmail. This is the security of the United States we're talking about” “Agents, the people that you recruit, foreign citizens, if they are hesitant to continue to spy for you, you can remind them that when they were first recruited and they signed a sheet of paper saying that they had taken some money from us, which is usually what happens, that you could remind them about that almost as a way to scare them into continuing to work with you. So the pressure — It sounds like blackmail — It's not blackmail. This is the security of the United States we're talking about. You have to do whatever you can in order to keep people working for the CIA.”

Wall Street Apes

343,588 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

JD Vance says the $300,000,000,000 Iran payment story is a "bullsh*t argument" that was "completely made up" by war hawks to tank the negotiation. VANCE: "What we did with the MOU is we actually worked not just with the Iranians but with the Gulf Arab states." "The Gulf States actually came to us and said, 'You know what? If the Iranians are willing, really willing to change their behavior, we'd like to invest in rebuilding their country.'" "Of course, none of that money comes from the United States." "Then you had all these people saying, 'No, no, no, no. You can't give them $300 billion.' It's like, we're not talking about giving them $300 billion. We're talking about letting other countries invest in Iran if Iran has changed the way that it treats the Gulf Arab countries." "If Iran's biggest enemies see that they have changed themselves so much that they're willing to invest in the Iranian economy, isn't that like the definition of a win-win?" "The hawks attacked us and misrepresented this and lied about it and said the Trump administration is going to give the Iranians $300 billion. And it's totally fake. It's completely made up. And it was done purely in order to politically tank the negotiation."

JD Vance says the $300,000,000,000 Iran payment story is a "bullsh*t argument" that was "completely made up" by war hawks to tank the negotiation. VANCE: "What we did with the MOU is we actually worked not just with the Iranians but with the Gulf Arab states." "The Gulf States actually came to us and said, 'You know what? If the Iranians are willing, really willing to change their behavior, we'd like to invest in rebuilding their country.'" "Of course, none of that money comes from the United States." "Then you had all these people saying, 'No, no, no, no. You can't give them $300 billion.' It's like, we're not talking about giving them $300 billion. We're talking about letting other countries invest in Iran if Iran has changed the way that it treats the Gulf Arab countries." "If Iran's biggest enemies see that they have changed themselves so much that they're willing to invest in the Iranian economy, isn't that like the definition of a win-win?" "The hawks attacked us and misrepresented this and lied about it and said the Trump administration is going to give the Iranians $300 billion. And it's totally fake. It's completely made up. And it was done purely in order to politically tank the negotiation."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

365,760 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

.Naval: Epistemology, which is a fancy word for the theory of how knowledge grows or how knowledge growth occurs. And we've all been told since we're young that there's a scientific method and that scientists sort of do this stuff in white lab coats and we're supposed to accept it because of this thing called the scientific method. And then they give us true beliefs that we can then say, well the science is settled and we take that we move on. And we all only have a very, very vague understanding of how this works. And people say, well maybe you go out in the real world, you look at what's happening, you make all these observations, and then based on that you form a theory, you test the theory against more observations, and the more observations you get the closer you get to the truth. And once you have enough observation it's true and then you call it a scientific theory or a law and it's settled and you move on. And this is the popular conception of how science works. And as Popper pointed out and as you take even further, this is completely wrong. And so I'd love for you to get into that, which is what is knowledge? How does it grow? What is the real scientific method? And how do we figure things out? David Deutsch: I love the way you just stated the prevailing view there and laced every aspect of it with the contempt that it deserves. So you just went through touching every base. It's amazing that this series of misconceptions is still common sense. I mean, that it was common sense at a time when we didn't really have science or when science was just starting up, when the main issue in science was freeing itself from dogmatism, freeing itself from religion, freeing itself from authority, and so on. There it was understandable that people would look for an alternative source of authority and they would think, oh, it's sense impressions. We can see the world and you know, these religious people, they can't even see God and so on. And so we are confined to what we can see. That's where we get our ideas from. And as you say, that is completely false. Sense impressions, like all observation, even the most careful scientific observation is all theory laden. And theories are inherently fallible. I mean, we actually want to replace our best theories. Everybody who does a PhD is technically anyway, working to overturn something in the existing body of knowledge. You're not turned away at the door if you say, I don't believe this stuff, I'm going to produce something better. Whereas for most of human history, that was exactly what you were forbidden to do. The idea was that we already had all the important knowledge. If you want to discover something new, what you had to make sure of was that it didn't contradict the existing knowledge. Now, you have to make sure that it does contradict existing knowledge. So more or less. Naval: Yeah, it's this tradition of criticism that you've talked about in the West, that the Enlightenment really ushered in the Enlightenment era. David Deutsch: It has been institutionalized. So in many ways, our institutions are wiser than we are. So the institutions of science, for instance, have this built in, even if scientists actually don't always act that way. In fact, they often don't act that way, and act in a dogmatic way and try to preserve the status quo and are resistant to new ideas and so on. But the institutions, the way the procedures of science work, makes the right thing happen in the end anyway, regardless of what the people are trying to do. Naval: So you're saying the knowledge of the true scientific method is embedded in the institutions of science in the PhD process? David Deutsch: Well, the best scientific method that we know of, and one shouldn't really think of it as a method, you know, there's this wonderful lecture by Popper when he first was made a professor at the London School of Economics. He was made a professor of scientific method, and his first six lectures, I wish the rest of them were, the first six lectures are on the internet somewhere. And he starts the first one by saying, I am the first professor of scientific method in the British Empire. The British Empire still existed at the time, more or less. And so the first thing I want to say to you is that there is no such thing as the scientific method. And then he goes on from there. So this subject does not exist. So if any of you have come here to learn the handle that you have to turn in order to make scientific knowledge come out the other end, you're going to be disappointed.

.Naval: Epistemology, which is a fancy word for the theory of how knowledge grows or how knowledge growth occurs. And we've all been told since we're young that there's a scientific method and that scientists sort of do this stuff in white lab coats and we're supposed to accept it because of this thing called the scientific method. And then they give us true beliefs that we can then say, well the science is settled and we take that we move on. And we all only have a very, very vague understanding of how this works. And people say, well maybe you go out in the real world, you look at what's happening, you make all these observations, and then based on that you form a theory, you test the theory against more observations, and the more observations you get the closer you get to the truth. And once you have enough observation it's true and then you call it a scientific theory or a law and it's settled and you move on. And this is the popular conception of how science works. And as Popper pointed out and as you take even further, this is completely wrong. And so I'd love for you to get into that, which is what is knowledge? How does it grow? What is the real scientific method? And how do we figure things out? David Deutsch: I love the way you just stated the prevailing view there and laced every aspect of it with the contempt that it deserves. So you just went through touching every base. It's amazing that this series of misconceptions is still common sense. I mean, that it was common sense at a time when we didn't really have science or when science was just starting up, when the main issue in science was freeing itself from dogmatism, freeing itself from religion, freeing itself from authority, and so on. There it was understandable that people would look for an alternative source of authority and they would think, oh, it's sense impressions. We can see the world and you know, these religious people, they can't even see God and so on. And so we are confined to what we can see. That's where we get our ideas from. And as you say, that is completely false. Sense impressions, like all observation, even the most careful scientific observation is all theory laden. And theories are inherently fallible. I mean, we actually want to replace our best theories. Everybody who does a PhD is technically anyway, working to overturn something in the existing body of knowledge. You're not turned away at the door if you say, I don't believe this stuff, I'm going to produce something better. Whereas for most of human history, that was exactly what you were forbidden to do. The idea was that we already had all the important knowledge. If you want to discover something new, what you had to make sure of was that it didn't contradict the existing knowledge. Now, you have to make sure that it does contradict existing knowledge. So more or less. Naval: Yeah, it's this tradition of criticism that you've talked about in the West, that the Enlightenment really ushered in the Enlightenment era. David Deutsch: It has been institutionalized. So in many ways, our institutions are wiser than we are. So the institutions of science, for instance, have this built in, even if scientists actually don't always act that way. In fact, they often don't act that way, and act in a dogmatic way and try to preserve the status quo and are resistant to new ideas and so on. But the institutions, the way the procedures of science work, makes the right thing happen in the end anyway, regardless of what the people are trying to do. Naval: So you're saying the knowledge of the true scientific method is embedded in the institutions of science in the PhD process? David Deutsch: Well, the best scientific method that we know of, and one shouldn't really think of it as a method, you know, there's this wonderful lecture by Popper when he first was made a professor at the London School of Economics. He was made a professor of scientific method, and his first six lectures, I wish the rest of them were, the first six lectures are on the internet somewhere. And he starts the first one by saying, I am the first professor of scientific method in the British Empire. The British Empire still existed at the time, more or less. And so the first thing I want to say to you is that there is no such thing as the scientific method. And then he goes on from there. So this subject does not exist. So if any of you have come here to learn the handle that you have to turn in order to make scientific knowledge come out the other end, you're going to be disappointed.

Deutsch Explains

116,352 просмотров • 1 год назад

President Trump says all hands are on deck at the White House when it comes to negotiations with Iran. REPORTER: "When you say that you're talking, is it Mr. Kushner or Mr. Witkoff, or who who's involved in those talks? TRUMP: "Sort of everybody... It's a big deal." "We are talking right now and we'll see what comes of it... Despite what everyone says about the election, I'm not in a hurry. "We have to do it right."

President Trump says all hands are on deck at the White House when it comes to negotiations with Iran. REPORTER: "When you say that you're talking, is it Mr. Kushner or Mr. Witkoff, or who who's involved in those talks? TRUMP: "Sort of everybody... It's a big deal." "We are talking right now and we'll see what comes of it... Despite what everyone says about the election, I'm not in a hurry. "We have to do it right."

Fox News

803,978 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 WOW! Stephen Miller just exposed it: "Some people might not like what I'm about to say, but it has to be said. You have the Left continue in its professional associations like nursing and doctors and education — people who casually CHEER ASSASSINATIONS." "Their conversation is: 'I'm glad that so and so was shot,' or 'I'm mad that so and so didn't finish the job.'" "This is common now in white-collar professions that are controlled by Democrat credentialing bodies, is it creates this kind of person." "And it's SICK, and when you see it online, you see it also in left-wing comedy where they cheer and they laugh and they joke and they all have a good time talking about our friends getting m*rdered!" "It's really fundamentally the normalization of assassination — and if we don't deal with this, we're in for a world of pain and a world of HURT." "It's just, it's sickening and it's heinous and it's just repugnant in every single way. But this gets back to the theme that I'm presenting today, which is that the third worldification of American politics is the normalization of assassination." "It's the normalization of the idea that assassinations are a common expression of disagreement. It is one of the most vile, horrible, evil society destroying things that can possibly happen to a country." Stephen Miller Will Cain

🚨 WOW! Stephen Miller just exposed it: "Some people might not like what I'm about to say, but it has to be said. You have the Left continue in its professional associations like nursing and doctors and education — people who casually CHEER ASSASSINATIONS." "Their conversation is: 'I'm glad that so and so was shot,' or 'I'm mad that so and so didn't finish the job.'" "This is common now in white-collar professions that are controlled by Democrat credentialing bodies, is it creates this kind of person." "And it's SICK, and when you see it online, you see it also in left-wing comedy where they cheer and they laugh and they joke and they all have a good time talking about our friends getting m*rdered!" "It's really fundamentally the normalization of assassination — and if we don't deal with this, we're in for a world of pain and a world of HURT." "It's just, it's sickening and it's heinous and it's just repugnant in every single way. But this gets back to the theme that I'm presenting today, which is that the third worldification of American politics is the normalization of assassination." "It's the normalization of the idea that assassinations are a common expression of disagreement. It is one of the most vile, horrible, evil society destroying things that can possibly happen to a country." Stephen Miller Will Cain

Eric Daugherty

100,938 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"It's a superhero movie that is for adults and has adult ideas in it. You don't have to think about it any harder than that. It goes way deeper. If you want to, you can tear it apart like a giant onion and keep peeling it until you're at its core. "But I think that it's cool to experience it just like when I read the comic book for the first time and I didn't know. No one was telling me what it's about or the why of it. You come to it fresh. And sometimes I wish I had that experience because I would love to see the movie or read the book for the first time again because that feeling was for me awesome. "Especially when you go into something with this anticipation that it's just a Hollywood superhero movie which is what a lot of people will think because they don't know. They see some guys fighting and then when you see the film you actually have this experience of it being taken apart. "Those archetypes, those mythological shapes, whether they be Batman or Superman or any of superheroes and how they're just turned around. Whether it's through sexual fetish or fighting, actually killing guys they fight. "Stuff like that or whether it's the end of the movie and there's this moral dilemma that is the end of the movie is also challenging on all those levels."

"It's a superhero movie that is for adults and has adult ideas in it. You don't have to think about it any harder than that. It goes way deeper. If you want to, you can tear it apart like a giant onion and keep peeling it until you're at its core. "But I think that it's cool to experience it just like when I read the comic book for the first time and I didn't know. No one was telling me what it's about or the why of it. You come to it fresh. And sometimes I wish I had that experience because I would love to see the movie or read the book for the first time again because that feeling was for me awesome. "Especially when you go into something with this anticipation that it's just a Hollywood superhero movie which is what a lot of people will think because they don't know. They see some guys fighting and then when you see the film you actually have this experience of it being taken apart. "Those archetypes, those mythological shapes, whether they be Batman or Superman or any of superheroes and how they're just turned around. Whether it's through sexual fetish or fighting, actually killing guys they fight. "Stuff like that or whether it's the end of the movie and there's this moral dilemma that is the end of the movie is also challenging on all those levels."

Zack Snyder Film

22,225 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Trump just released a bizarre statement. Not sure if it makes much sense. "Many say, don't punch down when talking about people like Chris Sununu or sloppy Chris Christie or Ada Hutchinson. I call him Ada, not Asa, because of certain reasons or others, but sometimes it's necessary to talk badly about those that for no reason other than politics speak badly about you. Otherwise, the people that love you don't know whether or not they're for real. Are they saying the truth or not? So sometimes you have to punch down and you have to say what's happening. Otherwise, they won't understand. It's not fair to them. You have to put them in proper perspective. These bad people, you have to put them in their place. People like this are very destructive, and you have to tell the voters what it's all about. Otherwise, why should they be able to understand it? Thank you very much."

Trump just released a bizarre statement. Not sure if it makes much sense. "Many say, don't punch down when talking about people like Chris Sununu or sloppy Chris Christie or Ada Hutchinson. I call him Ada, not Asa, because of certain reasons or others, but sometimes it's necessary to talk badly about those that for no reason other than politics speak badly about you. Otherwise, the people that love you don't know whether or not they're for real. Are they saying the truth or not? So sometimes you have to punch down and you have to say what's happening. Otherwise, they won't understand. It's not fair to them. You have to put them in proper perspective. These bad people, you have to put them in their place. People like this are very destructive, and you have to tell the voters what it's all about. Otherwise, why should they be able to understand it? Thank you very much."

Ian Miles

2,028,574 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Daniel Suarez had quite a bit to say about the criticism of Spire Motorsports as an "unserious" organization today. More than anything he's frustrated with the narrative and the distraction it's created. "That's the only part of that that upsets me a little bit. Here we are, we're talking about this - We shouldn't be talking about this. We should be talking about the Chase, how we're gonna be better, and it's a distraction. "That's the only part that upsets me a little bit. It creates a narrative that's a distraction." Daniel said it's fine that Carson Hocevar has his personality just as Spire's other drivers do and they have to be authentic, but they don't want it to affect the reputation or integrity of the team or create distractions within it. Daniel mentioned that he wanted to join Spire last year because he knows what it takes to be successful and he saw that within their team. "We just have to continue to focus on the right things and continue to move forward."

Daniel Suarez had quite a bit to say about the criticism of Spire Motorsports as an "unserious" organization today. More than anything he's frustrated with the narrative and the distraction it's created. "That's the only part of that that upsets me a little bit. Here we are, we're talking about this - We shouldn't be talking about this. We should be talking about the Chase, how we're gonna be better, and it's a distraction. "That's the only part that upsets me a little bit. It creates a narrative that's a distraction." Daniel said it's fine that Carson Hocevar has his personality just as Spire's other drivers do and they have to be authentic, but they don't want it to affect the reputation or integrity of the team or create distractions within it. Daniel mentioned that he wanted to join Spire last year because he knows what it takes to be successful and he saw that within their team. "We just have to continue to focus on the right things and continue to move forward."

Steven Taranto

34,103 просмотров • 8 дней назад

WHAT THE HELL HAVE I JUST WATCHED….‼️ Imagine being so morally bankrupt that you think it's funny to mock the people you have killed or are about to murder.

WHAT THE HELL HAVE I JUST WATCHED….‼️ Imagine being so morally bankrupt that you think it's funny to mock the people you have killed or are about to murder.

Earth Hippy 🌎🕊️💚

362,743 просмотров • 1 год назад

The people who are destroying us have the occult belief that they must tell you what they are doing to you so that karmic consequences do not come back on them. In the occult it's called "revelation of the method". They even use Hollywood to do it through TV shows just like this.

The people who are destroying us have the occult belief that they must tell you what they are doing to you so that karmic consequences do not come back on them. In the occult it's called "revelation of the method". They even use Hollywood to do it through TV shows just like this.

illuminatibot

749,574 просмотров • 2 лет назад