Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Danny Sheehan says the Psionic program recruited children to bring down actual ET craft because military pilots were having trouble. He says there has been substantial misconduct with the children that have been recruited And also the occupants of the ET craft Source -“New Thinking Allowed 🔗 in comments... Danny -“Now the other problem is, of course, that that the, the fact that these vehicles are run by, by te telepathic communication on the part of the pilot, that they were in fact having substantial difficulties in having the trained pilots that they have in the Air Force, for example, and in the Navy, that somehow they weren't, they weren't capable of the kind of consciousness that was necessary to communicate and navigate these craft.” “And so what they did is they went out and they started trying to recruit people as you point out that they've actually gone and tried to find children who demonstrate these kind of psychic capabilities, and that they began a, a sub-program of, this entire effort to try to gear up people who have these capabilities and recruit them to actually be pilots for these, these craft. And, and so that they could bring down the actual ET craft themselves.” “Not a mockup of them, or not something that's like them, but the actual craft themselves. And, and have young children be trained over years to learn how to fly these things because of the high levels of consciousness and psychic abilities that they've had. Now, I'm, I'm not at liberty to go into some of the details about this, because the means by which I've acquired this information put certain people at risk of, of revealing who they are. But there have been some very substantial, there's been some very substantial misconduct involved in working with these children and trying to train them to, to pilot these craft.” “And there have been some substantial misconduct with regard to the way they've treated the occupants of these craft to the point of capturing them, killing them, you know, subjecting them to all kinds of coercive activities, you know, and, and our new Paradigm Institute is working with people in the Justice Department now, the Federal Justice Department, to try to bring about a major investigation to determine what some of those activities have been so that we can purge those activities from the present system that they're working with and, and that's a, that's a whole kind of darker dimension of this thing.”show more

neandrewthal

5,518 subscribers

99,419 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Education Health & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

MyBaseGuide1 year ago

Empower your child's future today with iLEAD Schools. They are a proud supporter of military families and their children at Edwards Air Force based.

Fringe1 year ago

KIDS! People were rolling their eyes at me when I said they were recruiting kids.

neandrewthal1 year ago

I’ve heard the stories for a long time and it seems like it’s all coming to a head with the new round of whistleblowers, I think most people don’t want something like this to be possible so bad they ignore it totally or attack the pope that talk about it 😩

Lynda Thompson1 year ago

I have quite a bit to say on this as well.

neandrewthal1 year ago

Always appreciate hearing what you’ve got to say on stuff like this

Charlie HP1 year ago

what in the evangelion

neandrewthal1 year ago

Straight up

Jamie Christoffersen1 year ago

This is likely the dark side holding the doors to disclosure shut. May we create a verdant world for all children because emotional, spiritual poverty unmoved allow short term control but long term foundational rot.

Simon Bar1 year ago

Listen to this space for more background on the GATE program. "Martin" is now on the Skywatcher team.

neandrewthal1 year ago

I’ve talked to Jordan in spaces and I’m very familiar with his story

Related Videos

The CIA is searching for alien hybrids using Ancestry and 23 and Me according to Jason Jorjani “I was told by somebody in the program with direct experience of this program. They have back doors to Ancestry and 23 and Me and similar genetic analysts companies. Kit Green and a certain division of the CIA use the back doors they have to these programs to scan the databases of genetic material for a specific deviation from normal that they know to be the genetic marker of the Nordics. They know that a significant number of Nordics have escaped the civilization they’re living in and migrated to the United States. These Nordics are settling in certain parts of the country, particularly Colorado Rockies. In some cases they are indistinguishable from tall good looking Nordic people so they marry Americans and they have hybrid children with them, and a lot of these children and grandchildren have no idea what their real ancestry is. So they go and get these tests done without consulting their grandparents. What Kit Green and these people are interested in is they are worried about the infiltration of our society by these hybrids. What they might do once they identify them, I don’t know.“

The CIA is searching for alien hybrids using Ancestry and 23 and Me according to Jason Jorjani “I was told by somebody in the program with direct experience of this program. They have back doors to Ancestry and 23 and Me and similar genetic analysts companies. Kit Green and a certain division of the CIA use the back doors they have to these programs to scan the databases of genetic material for a specific deviation from normal that they know to be the genetic marker of the Nordics. They know that a significant number of Nordics have escaped the civilization they’re living in and migrated to the United States. These Nordics are settling in certain parts of the country, particularly Colorado Rockies. In some cases they are indistinguishable from tall good looking Nordic people so they marry Americans and they have hybrid children with them, and a lot of these children and grandchildren have no idea what their real ancestry is. So they go and get these tests done without consulting their grandparents. What Kit Green and these people are interested in is they are worried about the infiltration of our society by these hybrids. What they might do once they identify them, I don’t know.“

Red Panda Koala

1,289,182 views • 1 month ago

Dr. Andrew Wakefield - How The MMR Vaccine Is Linked To Autism and The CDC Cover-Up "I believe that there is a causal association between the measles, mumps, rubella vaccine and autism in many children for several reasons. Firstly, based upon the clinical history given by the parents. These parents were not anti vaccine. They took their children to be vaccinated on time, and then they reported a severe side effect. The child became drowsy, slept for three days, had high pitched screaming, had a seizure, and then never recovered." "So the clinical history is compelling in terms of evidence of some kind of encephalopathic or inflammatory event in the brain that then led to autistic regression. That's number one. And then based upon the clinical findings that we see in the children, there is immunological derangement, there is gastrointestinal disturbance, all of these things have been described and characterized and are consistent with the consequences of a viral infection." "We have found evidence in several studies of measles virus consistent with vaccine strain in the intestine, the blood, and the spinal fluid of these children. These findings have been variously reproduced. Others have not been able to find them, and therefore that remains an outstanding part of the scientific question." "But overall, the most important observation that has come to light recently is the fact that the CDC, the Centers for Disease Control themselves, have found a very strong positive association between younger age of exposure to MMR and autism risk, and they have covered that up." "And William Thompson, the whistleblower, has come forward and shown that there is this very, very strong statistical correlation between autism in two groups of children, children of African American origin, boys in particular, and children of all races who were mentally normal until they were one year of age. In other words, they were developing perfectly normally. They got something, something hit them, and then they regressed into autism." "And as in Thompson's words, this is exactly the group in which you would expect to find an association. So based upon those various tiers of evidence, I believe there is a very strong case that MMR vaccine is causally linked to autism in many children."

Dr. Andrew Wakefield - How The MMR Vaccine Is Linked To Autism and The CDC Cover-Up "I believe that there is a causal association between the measles, mumps, rubella vaccine and autism in many children for several reasons. Firstly, based upon the clinical history given by the parents. These parents were not anti vaccine. They took their children to be vaccinated on time, and then they reported a severe side effect. The child became drowsy, slept for three days, had high pitched screaming, had a seizure, and then never recovered." "So the clinical history is compelling in terms of evidence of some kind of encephalopathic or inflammatory event in the brain that then led to autistic regression. That's number one. And then based upon the clinical findings that we see in the children, there is immunological derangement, there is gastrointestinal disturbance, all of these things have been described and characterized and are consistent with the consequences of a viral infection." "We have found evidence in several studies of measles virus consistent with vaccine strain in the intestine, the blood, and the spinal fluid of these children. These findings have been variously reproduced. Others have not been able to find them, and therefore that remains an outstanding part of the scientific question." "But overall, the most important observation that has come to light recently is the fact that the CDC, the Centers for Disease Control themselves, have found a very strong positive association between younger age of exposure to MMR and autism risk, and they have covered that up." "And William Thompson, the whistleblower, has come forward and shown that there is this very, very strong statistical correlation between autism in two groups of children, children of African American origin, boys in particular, and children of all races who were mentally normal until they were one year of age. In other words, they were developing perfectly normally. They got something, something hit them, and then they regressed into autism." "And as in Thompson's words, this is exactly the group in which you would expect to find an association. So based upon those various tiers of evidence, I believe there is a very strong case that MMR vaccine is causally linked to autism in many children."

Camus

35,954 views • 1 year ago

Horrifying... RFK Jr.: "And the, you know, the one of the worst things about those experiments now is that it turns out many of those kids, if not most of them, did not even have HIV. So there's not even a pretense that there was, hidden benefit for these children and being guinea pigs for these drugs. These kids were chosen because they didn't have parents to protect them. And the law says you can't do that." "The law says if they don't have parents, the state has to appoint a guardian, and the guardian cannot allow experimentation on those kids unless there's a clear benefit from the medication to the children. And that's the only way that you can legally do it. So Tony Fauci made sure, and none of those kids had guardians, which is illegal. And then he hid what he was doing from the boards. He took foster homes in six states, and he turned them over to the pharmaceutical industry." "He made sure that the people who were running those foster homes were not even did not even have medical training. Most of them were immigrants who came from the Dominican Republic. They knew nothing about medicine or responsibilities, and they were sick. And when they realized slowly what they were involved in doing to these children, that they were torturing these children." And there's videos of these children, an old BBC documentary that will make you cry, I promise you, you cannot look at these without weeping. You know, one of these kids, a 12 year old who's trying to protect the eight years old, and and he has a tube in his stomach. And he's telling them, you know, I tried to fight them, and that's what they do. If you fight them, you can't fight them. You need to just take the drugs, and the kids didn't wanna take them because the drugs were making them horribly sick." "And Celia Farber was this amazing researcher who worked on this chapter for me and did a lot of the original research on it. She actually went up to Hawthorne, New York to the Gates Of Heaven Cemetery. She found the cemetery where Fauci was disposing of the corpses of these children who who died in his illegal experiments. She found an open pit. It was actually covered by a, by an astroturf carpet." "She opened the astroturf carpet and she saw hundreds and hundreds of tiny little coffins stacked haphazardly on upon each other because these are children who have no parents, and nobody was there to protect them. And Tony Fauci treated them as collateral damage, and, you know, his objective was to enlarge the markets for these pharmaceutical companies who he had partnered with by allowing, HIV, these toxic toxic chemotherapy drugs to be given to children."

Horrifying... RFK Jr.: "And the, you know, the one of the worst things about those experiments now is that it turns out many of those kids, if not most of them, did not even have HIV. So there's not even a pretense that there was, hidden benefit for these children and being guinea pigs for these drugs. These kids were chosen because they didn't have parents to protect them. And the law says you can't do that." "The law says if they don't have parents, the state has to appoint a guardian, and the guardian cannot allow experimentation on those kids unless there's a clear benefit from the medication to the children. And that's the only way that you can legally do it. So Tony Fauci made sure, and none of those kids had guardians, which is illegal. And then he hid what he was doing from the boards. He took foster homes in six states, and he turned them over to the pharmaceutical industry." "He made sure that the people who were running those foster homes were not even did not even have medical training. Most of them were immigrants who came from the Dominican Republic. They knew nothing about medicine or responsibilities, and they were sick. And when they realized slowly what they were involved in doing to these children, that they were torturing these children." And there's videos of these children, an old BBC documentary that will make you cry, I promise you, you cannot look at these without weeping. You know, one of these kids, a 12 year old who's trying to protect the eight years old, and and he has a tube in his stomach. And he's telling them, you know, I tried to fight them, and that's what they do. If you fight them, you can't fight them. You need to just take the drugs, and the kids didn't wanna take them because the drugs were making them horribly sick." "And Celia Farber was this amazing researcher who worked on this chapter for me and did a lot of the original research on it. She actually went up to Hawthorne, New York to the Gates Of Heaven Cemetery. She found the cemetery where Fauci was disposing of the corpses of these children who who died in his illegal experiments. She found an open pit. It was actually covered by a, by an astroturf carpet." "She opened the astroturf carpet and she saw hundreds and hundreds of tiny little coffins stacked haphazardly on upon each other because these are children who have no parents, and nobody was there to protect them. And Tony Fauci treated them as collateral damage, and, you know, his objective was to enlarge the markets for these pharmaceutical companies who he had partnered with by allowing, HIV, these toxic toxic chemotherapy drugs to be given to children."

Camus

184,141 views • 1 year ago

When President Trump praised DOGE for uncovering billions in government waste and fraud. "It's about a man named Elon Musk, and he's one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced. He stepped forward to put his very great talents into the service of our nation, and we appreciate it. And just want to say that Elon has worked tirelessly, helping lead the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations. And you know the kinds of things that he's he's found, and his people have found, he's brought a group of very smart people in, and they found things that are pretty unbelievable. I have to say that the numbers that we're talking about are substantial, but they're going to be very much more substantial with time, because many of the things that we're working on right now, we're going to have to remember Elon as we find them, but the numbers could double and triple, because many, many things, we don't want to go out with them until we're sure. With the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon delivered a colossal change in the old ways of doing business in Washington. Doge has installed geniuses with an engineering mindset and unbelievably talented people and computers. I actually asked Elon one time, what's their primary thing, and they have a lot of primary things, all having to do with being smart. But he said the thing that they're really the best that is working with computers so that they can't be outsmarted by somebody that's not so honest, that happens to also be good with computers, but not as good as these people, but the mindset of the senior ranks of every federal department, and it's really changed, and with Elon's guidance they're helping to detect fraud slash waste and modernize broken and outdated systems."

When President Trump praised DOGE for uncovering billions in government waste and fraud. "It's about a man named Elon Musk, and he's one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced. He stepped forward to put his very great talents into the service of our nation, and we appreciate it. And just want to say that Elon has worked tirelessly, helping lead the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations. And you know the kinds of things that he's he's found, and his people have found, he's brought a group of very smart people in, and they found things that are pretty unbelievable. I have to say that the numbers that we're talking about are substantial, but they're going to be very much more substantial with time, because many of the things that we're working on right now, we're going to have to remember Elon as we find them, but the numbers could double and triple, because many, many things, we don't want to go out with them until we're sure. With the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon delivered a colossal change in the old ways of doing business in Washington. Doge has installed geniuses with an engineering mindset and unbelievably talented people and computers. I actually asked Elon one time, what's their primary thing, and they have a lot of primary things, all having to do with being smart. But he said the thing that they're really the best that is working with computers so that they can't be outsmarted by somebody that's not so honest, that happens to also be good with computers, but not as good as these people, but the mindset of the senior ranks of every federal department, and it's really changed, and with Elon's guidance they're helping to detect fraud slash waste and modernize broken and outdated systems."

DogeDesigner

80,877 views • 10 days ago

Hirokazu Koreeda on how he directs Children: "Interviewer: I think 'Shoplifters' (2018) is very remarkable in showing different sides of a city and like you said, people who are pretty much invisible, but I do want to also commend you on another thing, is you often work with young actors, and they always tend to have a significant role in many of your films. How do you go about finding such dynamic young actors, and why do you often put these young people at the center of each one of your stories? Koreeda: First of all, I would say that I tend to make what I would call family dramas, and of course, you have to have children if you’re creating a family, but that’s how it started, but I found that as I did it, I became really interested. It became very interesting and fun to work with these children, and for example, the two children in this film, neither of them had any acting experience at all before this film. I brought them in, and what I find when you bring these children in, and you work with them is that the adult actors change. They become much more lively and natural in the way that they act, and I guess, at some point, I realized this, and I guess, became really attracted to the idea of having children and the impact that it had. Interviewer: Do you find that there is any struggle in terms of working with young actors, or in this case, young children who have not actually acted before? Koreeda: Just to clarify, I have worked with children in many of my films, and all of them have never had experienced before. I always go out and pick non-acting children to work in my films, so just, I wanted to put that out there. In terms of the struggle, it does take time. You have to give extra time to work with these children. When I choose these children, I have an audition, and I pick out who I want to the audition, and then when we get to set, I never give them the script. No child that I’ve worked with has been given a script beforehand, and when I get to the actual part where they’re going to be acting, I give them the lines myself, and work with them and coach them. What I find is that it’s actually really enjoyable, both for them and for myself that way. I also, because I’ve been doing this now for several years, I tend to have a fairly high success rate in choosing children that are able to work with me in that way. Interviewer: That’s fascinating, and it also shows how you are able to create such authentic performances from these child actors over and over again in so many of your films. I think it’s a unique gift that you have, and it’s something that very few directors, I think, here in the United States do. Koreeda: It’s true, I guess by working with these children, I learned. I discovered that the best way to do it was just to communicate verbally their lines, rather than giving them in a written format, and over time, this really worked, and so I just kept doing it. But, interestingly, I loved the movie 'Kramer vs Kramer' (1979), directed by Robert Benton, and one time I bought the movie with all the extra, the making of and everything, and I went over it, and I found through that, that in fact, the child in that movie was also given his lines every day by the assistant director each morning when they came in to set, so I discovered that it wasn’t just me that was doing this." (Koreeda's interview with Scott Menzel, We Live Entertainment, 2018)

Hirokazu Koreeda on how he directs Children: "Interviewer: I think 'Shoplifters' (2018) is very remarkable in showing different sides of a city and like you said, people who are pretty much invisible, but I do want to also commend you on another thing, is you often work with young actors, and they always tend to have a significant role in many of your films. How do you go about finding such dynamic young actors, and why do you often put these young people at the center of each one of your stories? Koreeda: First of all, I would say that I tend to make what I would call family dramas, and of course, you have to have children if you’re creating a family, but that’s how it started, but I found that as I did it, I became really interested. It became very interesting and fun to work with these children, and for example, the two children in this film, neither of them had any acting experience at all before this film. I brought them in, and what I find when you bring these children in, and you work with them is that the adult actors change. They become much more lively and natural in the way that they act, and I guess, at some point, I realized this, and I guess, became really attracted to the idea of having children and the impact that it had. Interviewer: Do you find that there is any struggle in terms of working with young actors, or in this case, young children who have not actually acted before? Koreeda: Just to clarify, I have worked with children in many of my films, and all of them have never had experienced before. I always go out and pick non-acting children to work in my films, so just, I wanted to put that out there. In terms of the struggle, it does take time. You have to give extra time to work with these children. When I choose these children, I have an audition, and I pick out who I want to the audition, and then when we get to set, I never give them the script. No child that I’ve worked with has been given a script beforehand, and when I get to the actual part where they’re going to be acting, I give them the lines myself, and work with them and coach them. What I find is that it’s actually really enjoyable, both for them and for myself that way. I also, because I’ve been doing this now for several years, I tend to have a fairly high success rate in choosing children that are able to work with me in that way. Interviewer: That’s fascinating, and it also shows how you are able to create such authentic performances from these child actors over and over again in so many of your films. I think it’s a unique gift that you have, and it’s something that very few directors, I think, here in the United States do. Koreeda: It’s true, I guess by working with these children, I learned. I discovered that the best way to do it was just to communicate verbally their lines, rather than giving them in a written format, and over time, this really worked, and so I just kept doing it. But, interestingly, I loved the movie 'Kramer vs Kramer' (1979), directed by Robert Benton, and one time I bought the movie with all the extra, the making of and everything, and I went over it, and I found through that, that in fact, the child in that movie was also given his lines every day by the assistant director each morning when they came in to set, so I discovered that it wasn’t just me that was doing this." (Koreeda's interview with Scott Menzel, We Live Entertainment, 2018)

DepressedBergman

49,522 views • 5 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump on Elon Musk and DOGE today: "It's about a man named Elon Musk, and he's one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced. He stepped forward to put his very great talents into the service of our nation, and we appreciate it. And just want to say that Elon has worked tirelessly, helping lead the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations. And you know the kinds of things that he's he's found, and his people have found, he's brought a group of very smart people in, and they found things that are pretty unbelievable. I have to say that the numbers that we're talking about are substantial, but they're going to be very much more substantial with time, because many of the things that we're working on right now, we're going to have to remember Elon as we find them, but the numbers could double and triple, because many, many things, we don't want to go out with them until we're sure. With the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon delivered a colossal change in the old ways of doing business in Washington. Doge has installed geniuses with an engineering mindset and unbelievably talented people and computers. I actually asked Elon one time, what's their primary thing, and they have a lot of primary things, all having to do with being smart. But he said the thing that they're really the best that is working with computers so that they can't be outsmarted by somebody that's not so honest, that happens to also be good with computers, but not as good as these people, but the mindset of the senior ranks of every federal department, and it's really changed, and with Elon's guidance they're helping to detect fraud slash waste and modernize broken and outdated systems."

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump on Elon Musk and DOGE today: "It's about a man named Elon Musk, and he's one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced. He stepped forward to put his very great talents into the service of our nation, and we appreciate it. And just want to say that Elon has worked tirelessly, helping lead the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations. And you know the kinds of things that he's he's found, and his people have found, he's brought a group of very smart people in, and they found things that are pretty unbelievable. I have to say that the numbers that we're talking about are substantial, but they're going to be very much more substantial with time, because many of the things that we're working on right now, we're going to have to remember Elon as we find them, but the numbers could double and triple, because many, many things, we don't want to go out with them until we're sure. With the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon delivered a colossal change in the old ways of doing business in Washington. Doge has installed geniuses with an engineering mindset and unbelievably talented people and computers. I actually asked Elon one time, what's their primary thing, and they have a lot of primary things, all having to do with being smart. But he said the thing that they're really the best that is working with computers so that they can't be outsmarted by somebody that's not so honest, that happens to also be good with computers, but not as good as these people, but the mindset of the senior ranks of every federal department, and it's really changed, and with Elon's guidance they're helping to detect fraud slash waste and modernize broken and outdated systems."

DogeDesigner

86,670 views • 1 year ago

"If you have ambitions to be a Professor at Yale, Harvard, or one of these big institutions, the way you do that is mostly by getting funding for research. It's by getting a lot of publishing - a lot flying around the world to talk about something. You need all of these things to bolster your reputation as an international expert in this area. Now, the best way to do that, at least in psychiatry but I suspect in other areas of medicine, is actually to collaborate with pharmaceutical companies to run clinical trials. They write the publications for you - most of it, they do a lot of the grunt work, they give you the protocols, and then, essentially, they fund you and fly you around the place. I used to remember, as a junior doctor, looking up to the Professors. And they would say, 'These drugs are safe and effective. There's not a lot of problems there.' ...What I've seen more and more is that they've been compromised, and that they have incentives tied to the money and to career advancement. That means that they can't be as forthright as they ought to be about these things. And it's gotten to a problem where these are the Professors who are training the doctors who are setting the tone for what is acceptable care out there. And I think that's one of the biggest problems out there." - @taperclinic

"If you have ambitions to be a Professor at Yale, Harvard, or one of these big institutions, the way you do that is mostly by getting funding for research. It's by getting a lot of publishing - a lot flying around the world to talk about something. You need all of these things to bolster your reputation as an international expert in this area. Now, the best way to do that, at least in psychiatry but I suspect in other areas of medicine, is actually to collaborate with pharmaceutical companies to run clinical trials. They write the publications for you - most of it, they do a lot of the grunt work, they give you the protocols, and then, essentially, they fund you and fly you around the place. I used to remember, as a junior doctor, looking up to the Professors. And they would say, 'These drugs are safe and effective. There's not a lot of problems there.' ...What I've seen more and more is that they've been compromised, and that they have incentives tied to the money and to career advancement. That means that they can't be as forthright as they ought to be about these things. And it's gotten to a problem where these are the Professors who are training the doctors who are setting the tone for what is acceptable care out there. And I think that's one of the biggest problems out there." - @taperclinic

Jan Jekielek

43,499 views • 1 year ago

Abby Phillip: “Why can't [Trump] see this for what it is, which is a very real thing, not a hoax, with real victims, and with a lot of people potentially involved in something, none of whom have been held accountable?” Scott Jennings: “Well, the hoax is Democrats and others who have gone on television and either implied or worse that he had something to do with it. There's not a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with it, but that's what they want people to believe. That's the narrative that they are trying to get out there.” “That's the hoax. He's never said what happened to them as a hoax. In fact, there seems to be some shards of evidence in here that Trump may have been one of the people that turned in Jeffrey Epstein, which is why Epstein, according to some of the documents, apparently hated Donald Trump. And so the hoax is not that it happened. The hoax is what people are trying to imply or worse—”

Abby Phillip: “Why can't [Trump] see this for what it is, which is a very real thing, not a hoax, with real victims, and with a lot of people potentially involved in something, none of whom have been held accountable?” Scott Jennings: “Well, the hoax is Democrats and others who have gone on television and either implied or worse that he had something to do with it. There's not a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with it, but that's what they want people to believe. That's the narrative that they are trying to get out there.” “That's the hoax. He's never said what happened to them as a hoax. In fact, there seems to be some shards of evidence in here that Trump may have been one of the people that turned in Jeffrey Epstein, which is why Epstein, according to some of the documents, apparently hated Donald Trump. And so the hoax is not that it happened. The hoax is what people are trying to imply or worse—”

RedWave Press

53,415 views • 7 months ago

The Devastating Affects Of The Idaho Farmland Water Shutoff 🚨 UPDATE: “I've talked to the Governor, and the Governor's position is he can't do anything about this” “The, the Department of Water Resources, in the governor's office has sent out the order that they gotta close their wells. That is really a tough deal because these farmers have already planted, the timing on this is horrible. It costs $2,000 an acre to plant potatoes or more, dollars 2,000 to 3,000. Um, and now they have to shut down the wells and give up that investment. Their land is mortgaged, the potato crops are mortgaged, everything's financed, they will basically lose their farms if they turn their water off. We're having one of the best water years that we've had in the last decade. There's more water than they know what to do with. In this kind of a year, they're deciding that they're going to close down 500,000 acres because of because of the new formula that have been introduced on the prerogative, I guess, of the Department of of Water Resources. None of it makes any sense. So they would say they're following through with this agreement that they had put in place a few years ago, and the farmers should have known. I've talked to the governor, and the governor's position is he can't do anything about this because it's mentioned in the constitution and the supreme court has weighed in, but honestly, when I talk to the attorneys they're saying that's that's not a truthful version of what the facts are. The governor's office has a whole lot of prerogative, the Department of Water Resources has the prerogative on how to interpret these laws. By the way, the law does give priority to the folks that have senior water rights, so that's parcelled true. But the governor, I'm gonna plead that the governor exercised leadership here and that the legislature exercise some leadership and put, build some framework. What we need to have them do is build some framework around these agreements and around the laws so that, um, we don't lose all of our agriculture in this area and that appears to be the plan.”

The Devastating Affects Of The Idaho Farmland Water Shutoff 🚨 UPDATE: “I've talked to the Governor, and the Governor's position is he can't do anything about this” “The, the Department of Water Resources, in the governor's office has sent out the order that they gotta close their wells. That is really a tough deal because these farmers have already planted, the timing on this is horrible. It costs $2,000 an acre to plant potatoes or more, dollars 2,000 to 3,000. Um, and now they have to shut down the wells and give up that investment. Their land is mortgaged, the potato crops are mortgaged, everything's financed, they will basically lose their farms if they turn their water off. We're having one of the best water years that we've had in the last decade. There's more water than they know what to do with. In this kind of a year, they're deciding that they're going to close down 500,000 acres because of because of the new formula that have been introduced on the prerogative, I guess, of the Department of of Water Resources. None of it makes any sense. So they would say they're following through with this agreement that they had put in place a few years ago, and the farmers should have known. I've talked to the governor, and the governor's position is he can't do anything about this because it's mentioned in the constitution and the supreme court has weighed in, but honestly, when I talk to the attorneys they're saying that's that's not a truthful version of what the facts are. The governor's office has a whole lot of prerogative, the Department of Water Resources has the prerogative on how to interpret these laws. By the way, the law does give priority to the folks that have senior water rights, so that's parcelled true. But the governor, I'm gonna plead that the governor exercised leadership here and that the legislature exercise some leadership and put, build some framework. What we need to have them do is build some framework around these agreements and around the laws so that, um, we don't lose all of our agriculture in this area and that appears to be the plan.”

Wall Street Apes

685,251 views • 2 years ago

The scandal of Ilhan Omar’s people scamming Minnesota 🚨 The Somalians in Ilhan Omar's district have over 1,000 investigations for corruption in Minneapolis out of a population of 70,000 centered there - They brought about 80,000 of these Somali Muslims in, they grouped them in one spot, and then they used that to elect her to Congress. That's how she got there. - According to the stats, is over 90% of these people have availed themselves of some sort of social service welfare program “Now the authorities in Minnesota have a huge investigation because these people have come up with all kind of different scams. Scams saying they were going to feed children, scams for housing, scams for fake marriages, fake divorces, you name it. They came here and they started scamming the system like nobody would believe. And these are her people all grouped together in Minnesota.“

The scandal of Ilhan Omar’s people scamming Minnesota 🚨 The Somalians in Ilhan Omar's district have over 1,000 investigations for corruption in Minneapolis out of a population of 70,000 centered there - They brought about 80,000 of these Somali Muslims in, they grouped them in one spot, and then they used that to elect her to Congress. That's how she got there. - According to the stats, is over 90% of these people have availed themselves of some sort of social service welfare program “Now the authorities in Minnesota have a huge investigation because these people have come up with all kind of different scams. Scams saying they were going to feed children, scams for housing, scams for fake marriages, fake divorces, you name it. They came here and they started scamming the system like nobody would believe. And these are her people all grouped together in Minnesota.“

Wall Street Apes

219,402 views • 9 months ago

We are praying for this nation. We're people of the Book, and the Book tells us to pray for our leaders, even if we don't agree with them. And Trump is one of our leaders. He was a president. And Joe Biden is one of our leaders. He is the current sitting president. There aren’t many things that President Biden does that I agree with, but it is my job to pray for him anyway. And certainly to not bring him harm. I can disagree with him and still honor the office and still honor the person. And certainly not engage in any kind of stupidity like some of the rhetoric that has gone on in the last 48 hours—and really has gone on for the last several years. Some of you are really too serious about what happens in the White House. If you'd concentrate half as much on what happens in your house, you’d be in a whole lot better shape. That's really the common denominator of success. It hasn't got anything to do with those guys up there. Yes, they do some things that affect our lives, but I've had several of them try to ruin my life, and they hadn't pulled it off. And I've had several of them try to make my life better, and they haven’t pulled that off. I'm old, and I've seen presidents that were going to be the end of democracy, and they weren't. And I've seen presidents that were going to be the second coming of Jesus, and they were not even close. I think the problem is that the level of anger has to do with the expectations of what the office can provide. Treat these people like people—they have families, they have children, they have friends. I've got friends who are congressmen, friends who are senators, and the stuff that they have to put up with… Some of you are just out of control, and you should not spend your money on Financial Peace University—You should spend it on counseling. Concentrate on fighting for or against ideas. When you have to vilify or destroy a person because you disagree with their idea, you've already lost the argument, because you've lost the high ground. You don't have to destroy people for your idea to win.

We are praying for this nation. We're people of the Book, and the Book tells us to pray for our leaders, even if we don't agree with them. And Trump is one of our leaders. He was a president. And Joe Biden is one of our leaders. He is the current sitting president. There aren’t many things that President Biden does that I agree with, but it is my job to pray for him anyway. And certainly to not bring him harm. I can disagree with him and still honor the office and still honor the person. And certainly not engage in any kind of stupidity like some of the rhetoric that has gone on in the last 48 hours—and really has gone on for the last several years. Some of you are really too serious about what happens in the White House. If you'd concentrate half as much on what happens in your house, you’d be in a whole lot better shape. That's really the common denominator of success. It hasn't got anything to do with those guys up there. Yes, they do some things that affect our lives, but I've had several of them try to ruin my life, and they hadn't pulled it off. And I've had several of them try to make my life better, and they haven’t pulled that off. I'm old, and I've seen presidents that were going to be the end of democracy, and they weren't. And I've seen presidents that were going to be the second coming of Jesus, and they were not even close. I think the problem is that the level of anger has to do with the expectations of what the office can provide. Treat these people like people—they have families, they have children, they have friends. I've got friends who are congressmen, friends who are senators, and the stuff that they have to put up with… Some of you are just out of control, and you should not spend your money on Financial Peace University—You should spend it on counseling. Concentrate on fighting for or against ideas. When you have to vilify or destroy a person because you disagree with their idea, you've already lost the argument, because you've lost the high ground. You don't have to destroy people for your idea to win.

Dave Ramsey

213,075 views • 1 year ago

[UAP], "were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology." ~Luna (Note: Transcript is much longer than video clip below) 🤔 Luna: There Are No "Holy Shit" Videos That I've Seen That The Public Has Not 🤔 The 46 videos we requested, "have all now been declassified." ~Rep. Anna Paulina Luna "ALL 46 [videos] have not been released." ~Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell to Me (I'd like to get that clarified from Rep. Luna) "If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up at...you'd be up at night worrying about, or thinking about this stuff." ~Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office to Rob Finnerty And Burchett added that we'd, "come unglued." We also had this... "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Has that video been released?) Compare that to what Luna said... Douthat: "Is there anything else out there (video-wise) that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "As far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out." (So nothing to keep us up at night or to make us come unglued, or...make us gasp. I appreciate her being level headed with that and not hyping it. So, what are Burlison and Burchett talking about? I have learned to see things for myself first before getting too excited about what others say about x, y and z. Some of those videos in the two releases ARE very interesting but nothing has kept me up at night or made me gasp. Do videos like that even exist? It's not the first time I've asked that question.) ~~~Extended Transcript from Segment~~~ Douthat: "You have had access, before these videos were released. In what context have you seen these videos before they were released? Luna: "So I went into the SCIF and...I went and actually observed and saw all the videos before they were released to go through, numerically, to make sure that those were the ones that correlated to the ones that we had actually put out in the request. So those have all now been declassified." Douthat: "All of the ones?" Luna: "Yeah, in the list." (Remember: Regarding the list of 46, Corbell told me that, ""ALL 46 [videos] have not been released.") Douthat: "But how did you get the list of videos in the request?" Luna: "We had a group that came forward, it was bipartisan, former whistleblowers from the intelligence community that had access to... I would compare it to something like YouTube that exists within the intelligence community. And they came up with the files, and they said you need to get access to these files and have them released. And so, before the order came out from the President, we had come up with this list. We had been getting push back, and then after [Trump] gave the green light for it, it was declassified, and those are now up and able to be [viewed] at the Department if War." Douthat: "And what do you think they show?" Luna: "Well, there's some interesting stuff. I think that they show UAPs. There has been one of the videos that has since been debunked to be actually the infrared that was picking up aircraft that was farther in distance, but the optics are kind of an illusion in that sense. So there's been one that's been debunked. But there are ones that they cannot explain. They've tried to cross-reference it with other data, and the way that these things are maneuvering are pretty wild. And so, again, I think that they show UAPs in some instances." Douthat: "Right. And you think that one reason to take this stuff seriously is that they correlate with direct-pilot testimony of the kind that you've heard, right. So it's not like, I'm just... Imagine the completely skeptical listener or viewer, of which there are reasonably many, who says, 'Okay, you have some number of videos, we don't know what they are, but if one of them turns out to be sort of some prosaic explanation, we can assume a lot of them will be.' So what else makes you think..." Luna: "In the specific incident of Eglin Air Force Base, which is where we had the pilot testimony and we were able to see some images, these things were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology is getting completely fried." Douthat: "And this is something that pilots told you had happened to them? Luna: "Yes, yep. Now, the other issue is, sometimes pilots won't report because they don't want to be taken off flight status. So there's removing the stigma of if you're supposed to have safe flying. You want to also track national security issues. You have to be able to document this stuff. But when you have this type of stuff impacting military training, impacting flight operations, impacting our technology, it's a problem. "We should follow up, and then say, 'Okay, well, is this technology that, potentially, could be advanced tech from adversary nations? I don't, necessarily, think that's the case, because if that was true, we wouldn't be number one, currently. Some of this stuff that we're seeing is pretty wild. You saw the New York Times report (2017 and the Tic Tac ~Joe), and just how it's defying physics, if you will. But then the other aspect of, what can we as Congress do next? We can declassify. I don't think, you know, this aspect of people saying it's not enough..." Douthat: "Are there things that you've seen in a SCIF, or not in a SCIF, that are wilder than this (the videos that have already been released)? That would like, make the front page of the New York Times as, you know, no one can be skeptical anymore?" Luna: "No, I think the aspect of, do I have, you know, a location where there's a little green man on a slab in a fridge (laughs). I don't think I'm gonna get that (laughs)." Douthat: "Wait, we're gonna get to that. Just stick with the videos. Is there anything else out there that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "Well, I think that there's probably going to be some more release of other videos as well, other testimony. They're still combing. But, as far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out."

[UAP], "were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology." ~Luna (Note: Transcript is much longer than video clip below) 🤔 Luna: There Are No "Holy Shit" Videos That I've Seen That The Public Has Not 🤔 The 46 videos we requested, "have all now been declassified." ~Rep. Anna Paulina Luna "ALL 46 [videos] have not been released." ~Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell to Me (I'd like to get that clarified from Rep. Luna) "If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up at...you'd be up at night worrying about, or thinking about this stuff." ~Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office to Rob Finnerty And Burchett added that we'd, "come unglued." We also had this... "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Has that video been released?) Compare that to what Luna said... Douthat: "Is there anything else out there (video-wise) that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "As far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out." (So nothing to keep us up at night or to make us come unglued, or...make us gasp. I appreciate her being level headed with that and not hyping it. So, what are Burlison and Burchett talking about? I have learned to see things for myself first before getting too excited about what others say about x, y and z. Some of those videos in the two releases ARE very interesting but nothing has kept me up at night or made me gasp. Do videos like that even exist? It's not the first time I've asked that question.) ~Extended Transcript from Segment~ Douthat: "You have had access, before these videos were released. In what context have you seen these videos before they were released? Luna: "So I went into the SCIF and...I went and actually observed and saw all the videos before they were released to go through, numerically, to make sure that those were the ones that correlated to the ones that we had actually put out in the request. So those have all now been declassified." Douthat: "All of the ones?" Luna: "Yeah, in the list." (Remember: Regarding the list of 46, Corbell told me that, ""ALL 46 [videos] have not been released.") Douthat: "But how did you get the list of videos in the request?" Luna: "We had a group that came forward, it was bipartisan, former whistleblowers from the intelligence community that had access to... I would compare it to something like YouTube that exists within the intelligence community. And they came up with the files, and they said you need to get access to these files and have them released. And so, before the order came out from the President, we had come up with this list. We had been getting push back, and then after [Trump] gave the green light for it, it was declassified, and those are now up and able to be [viewed] at the Department if War." Douthat: "And what do you think they show?" Luna: "Well, there's some interesting stuff. I think that they show UAPs. There has been one of the videos that has since been debunked to be actually the infrared that was picking up aircraft that was farther in distance, but the optics are kind of an illusion in that sense. So there's been one that's been debunked. But there are ones that they cannot explain. They've tried to cross-reference it with other data, and the way that these things are maneuvering are pretty wild. And so, again, I think that they show UAPs in some instances." Douthat: "Right. And you think that one reason to take this stuff seriously is that they correlate with direct-pilot testimony of the kind that you've heard, right. So it's not like, I'm just... Imagine the completely skeptical listener or viewer, of which there are reasonably many, who says, 'Okay, you have some number of videos, we don't know what they are, but if one of them turns out to be sort of some prosaic explanation, we can assume a lot of them will be.' So what else makes you think..." Luna: "In the specific incident of Eglin Air Force Base, which is where we had the pilot testimony and we were able to see some images, these things were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology is getting completely fried." Douthat: "And this is something that pilots told you had happened to them? Luna: "Yes, yep. Now, the other issue is, sometimes pilots won't report because they don't want to be taken off flight status. So there's removing the stigma of if you're supposed to have safe flying. You want to also track national security issues. You have to be able to document this stuff. But when you have this type of stuff impacting military training, impacting flight operations, impacting our technology, it's a problem. "We should follow up, and then say, 'Okay, well, is this technology that, potentially, could be advanced tech from adversary nations? I don't, necessarily, think that's the case, because if that was true, we wouldn't be number one, currently. Some of this stuff that we're seeing is pretty wild. You saw the New York Times report (2017 and the Tic Tac ~Joe), and just how it's defying physics, if you will. But then the other aspect of, what can we as Congress do next? We can declassify. I don't think, you know, this aspect of people saying it's not enough..." Douthat: "Are there things that you've seen in a SCIF, or not in a SCIF, that are wilder than this (the videos that have already been released)? That would like, make the front page of the New York Times as, you know, no one can be skeptical anymore?" Luna: "No, I think the aspect of, do I have, you know, a location where there's a little green man on a slab in a fridge (laughs). I don't think I'm gonna get that (laughs)." Douthat: "Wait, we're gonna get to that. Just stick with the videos. Is there anything else out there that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "Well, I think that there's probably going to be some more release of other videos as well, other testimony. They're still combing. But, as far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out."

Joe Murgia

14,119 views • 25 days ago

Gen. Jack Keane says he’s skeptical of Iran, warning the regime has a long history of deception and arguing the goal should be forcing them to give up capabilities they would otherwise lose by force: “I’m skeptical here, Sean. We’re dealing with a regime that is pathological liars and cheaters, and they have done everything they can to deceive us in the past. Just prior to going into this conflict, Sean, one of the reasons why we went into it is because the Iranians were lying to us and not willing to be forthcoming in terms of a deal. Obviously, we began hostilities for other reasons as well, but that was certainly one of them. So we have to look at these people—we know who they are, 47 years now. And President Trump knows exactly who these people are, and I think he knows what he wants out of this. He wants, essentially, for them to surrender everything that we would take from them by force. That makes some sense.”

Gen. Jack Keane says he’s skeptical of Iran, warning the regime has a long history of deception and arguing the goal should be forcing them to give up capabilities they would otherwise lose by force: “I’m skeptical here, Sean. We’re dealing with a regime that is pathological liars and cheaters, and they have done everything they can to deceive us in the past. Just prior to going into this conflict, Sean, one of the reasons why we went into it is because the Iranians were lying to us and not willing to be forthcoming in terms of a deal. Obviously, we began hostilities for other reasons as well, but that was certainly one of them. So we have to look at these people—we know who they are, 47 years now. And President Trump knows exactly who these people are, and I think he knows what he wants out of this. He wants, essentially, for them to surrender everything that we would take from them by force. That makes some sense.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

207,232 views • 3 months ago

.Libby Emmons to Jack Posobiec on the ISIS-inspired NYC bombing suspects: "These are well-to-do people who have taken it upon themselves to say that they hate everything that has been given to them ... These are the children of America at this point, and they hate us."

.Libby Emmons to Jack Posobiec on the ISIS-inspired NYC bombing suspects: "These are well-to-do people who have taken it upon themselves to say that they hate everything that has been given to them ... These are the children of America at this point, and they hate us."

Human Events

21,792 views • 3 months ago

"I think 80% of them said in their interviews that at some point, they had all reached a point where they felt that death was an easier life than dealing with the injuries that they were dealing with. But when they met each other, that all changed. They talked each other off the ledge and said, 'No, life is worth fighting for.' And some of them have improved and some of them have not. Some of them have gotten worse and probably will continue to do so, and probably have a reduced lifespan as a result of this. Not everyone has been injured, but that's the danger of when we start treating medicine as a one-size-fits-all situation. It has to be very personalized and we have to understand how every body responds, particularly to new technologies that have never been injected into the bloodstream in this way before. It was very, very reckless. And as you've had on your show many times, one of my dear friends, Robert W Malone, MD, who's one of the inventors of mRNA technology, will say that's something that he never imagined they would have done with this thing that he was one of the inventors of. It shouldn't have been done." - Mikki Willis React19

"I think 80% of them said in their interviews that at some point, they had all reached a point where they felt that death was an easier life than dealing with the injuries that they were dealing with. But when they met each other, that all changed. They talked each other off the ledge and said, 'No, life is worth fighting for.' And some of them have improved and some of them have not. Some of them have gotten worse and probably will continue to do so, and probably have a reduced lifespan as a result of this. Not everyone has been injured, but that's the danger of when we start treating medicine as a one-size-fits-all situation. It has to be very personalized and we have to understand how every body responds, particularly to new technologies that have never been injected into the bloodstream in this way before. It was very, very reckless. And as you've had on your show many times, one of my dear friends, Robert W Malone, MD, who's one of the inventors of mRNA technology, will say that's something that he never imagined they would have done with this thing that he was one of the inventors of. It shouldn't have been done." - Mikki Willis React19

Jan Jekielek

10,642 views • 1 year ago

Leavitt: "There have been bureaucrats at some of these agencies that have been trying to act independent. They need to remember who they work for. It's the executive of the executive branch. You look at the US Institute of Peace for example. There was a bit of standoff with bureaucrats who didn't want to realize who they work for, and that is Donald Trump."

Leavitt: "There have been bureaucrats at some of these agencies that have been trying to act independent. They need to remember who they work for. It's the executive of the executive branch. You look at the US Institute of Peace for example. There was a bit of standoff with bureaucrats who didn't want to realize who they work for, and that is Donald Trump."

Aaron Rupar

756,794 views • 1 year ago