Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Data often lie on a low-dimensional manifold embedded in a high-dimensional space. But these manifolds are often highly non-linear, making linear dimensionality reduction methods like PCA insufficient. This has motivated the development of non-linear dimensionality reduction.

212,605 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Tired of all the changing fads about when to give gad? Do you know which gadolinium contrast is safe to give? Know what to do w/gadolinium in patients w/kidney disease? Watch for what you NEED to know about gadolinium from AJNR SCANtastic! Gadolinium in the body acts like a bad dog. If let free, it tries to take over other’s territories. It tries replace normal metals in your body, like calcium, resulting in disruption normal homeostasis. So we do the same thing we would do for a bad dog! We restrain it! We bind w/other compounds so it can’t roam free & cause trouble 1. We can put it on a leash--linear agents Linear agents are like leashes—they bind gad like leash, holding on to it, but not surrounding it Remember: Leashes are Linear 2. We can put it in a cage—cyclic agents Cyclic agents surround gad like a cage surrounds a dog, so there is no way to get out Remember: Cyclic & Cage both start w/C! Cyclic agents do a better job keeping gad bound & out of trouble. Like a leash, linear agents are more likely to break & let gad go, causing toxicity—unlike hard cages Agent class is based on the risk of deposition of free gad in connective tissue or nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) Class 1: High risk, linear agents Remember 1 is done! Class 2: Safe, no NSF cases, mainly cyclic Remember 2 is the go to agent! Class 3: Used to be liver agents, no NSF cases, but small numbers. Now these are class II as well Remember 3 where safety is maybe Now you are up to date on the latest fads w/gad!

Lea Alhilali, MD

16,068 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

SaaS isn’t dead, it just needs to become agent-native. Linear (Linear) is a great example of how: They pivoted the product to be used by both humans and agents, and that has made them one of the premier software tools in the agent-native era. I had Linear’s cofounder and CEO Karri Saarinen on Every 📧's AI & I to talk about how a product management tool for human software developers became an agent-native tool—and how Linear’s trajectory reveals a bright future for SaaS businesses: - Speed means decisions matter more, not less. AI makes it easy to have an idea and build it without considering whether its existence is justified. When ChatGPT was released, SaaS companies were launching their own chatbots left, right, and center. Instead of jumping on the bandwagon, Linear stopped to consider whether the application was useful. (It wasn’t.) - Just because the technology has changed doesn’t mean your mission should. Karri attributes Linear’s success to never losing sight of what matters: helping teams develop great software. Instead of chasing trends, Linear focused on understanding how AI was impacting its customers’ workflows—and updating its product accordingly. - Agents are now first-class users. Linear never tried to change what it was or did well; it just expanded the user base. Companies can now kick off agents inside Linear, manage them, and track what they're working on alongside the humans on the team, which explains why Codex, Coinbase, and Brex all run their agents on Linear. This is a must watch for anyone interested in how an agent-native SaaS company operates. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction and how Every first discovered Linear: 00:00:39 Why Linear waited to ship AI features instead of rushing to chatbots: 00:02:00 Linear's agent platform and becoming the system that guides AI agents: 00:05:06 Why "SaaS is dead" is a simplistic narrative: 00:07:42 How Linear adopted AI coding tools internally: 00:12:18 AI's impact on product building workflows—speed versus thoughtfulness: 00:17:45 The value of conceptual work and thinking before shipping: 00:22:18 How AI is reshaping Linear's product strategy: 00:29:30 Demo: Linear's agent skills, shared context, and code review workflow: 00:37:18 The future of product development and the enduring role of human judgment: 00:47:48

Dan Shipper 📧

36,359 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Andrew Ng just revealed why the AI companies throwing the most compute at the problem are going to lose. The winner of the intelligence race won’t use the most compute. They’ll waste the least. Ng: “Most of your high-dimensional data lies on a lower-dimensional subspace. It’s just a fact of life.” Here’s what that means in practice. You have a 10,000-dimensional dataset. Every dimension dragged through every calculation. Every training cycle hauling dead weight the model will never use. Ng: “You’re carrying around these 10,000-dimensional examples throughout your whole training process.” That bloat isn’t just inefficient. It’s a tax on every computation you run. Memory bandwidth. Network bandwidth. Computational speed. All of it eaten by dimensions that contribute nothing to intelligence. They contribute noise. The insight that separates the architects from the arms race: that 10,000-dimensional dataset is almost entirely captured by a much smaller subspace. The signal lives in a fraction of the space you’re paying to process. Compress it. 10,000 dimensions down to 1,000. Ng: “You can run your learning algorithm on a much lower-dimensional set of data and it may be much more efficient.” Same hardware. Same budget. A fraction of the friction. Brute force is the strategy of whoever has the deepest pockets. Compression is the strategy of whoever actually understands the problem. The companies that master this don’t just build faster models. They build models that find more truth in less data than anything scaling blindly ever will. Intelligence was never about processing everything. It’s about knowing what to cut.

Dustin

215,185 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten