Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Dave Eby is asked "You were Attorney General when the Interpretation act was brought in. Your government closed debate on that amendment. "A lot of critics say you're personally responsible for a lot of the crisis with property rights and aboriginal issues in this province. How do you respond...

cbcwatcher's profile picture

cbcwatcher

44,290 subscribers

77,121 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🦅🏡⚖️ : David Eby lied to everyone 11 days ago about the BC Supreme Court ruling on Cowichan land title claims against private property owners, in Richmond British Columbia. 🧐Watch the full brief video as there are several clips added to provide full context. In the last clip hereditary Chief of Lyackson, Huy’wu’qw Shana Thomas, makes it clear, she wants Aboriginal title to apply to all the properties in the same way the Crown had title, when the Crown sold the property to the current land owners. Giving Aboriginal title would nullify the current land owners title and force them to make an agreement with whichever tribe regains land title, through the courts. Remember folks, some properties have multiple land title claims against the property, from multiple 1st Nation tribes. The major question is, why has David Eby not resigned? How many times can a Premier lie to taxpayers on critical issues? David Eby knew for years he could inform private property owners who have a land title claim against their property and he chose to keep them out of the process. This was an intentional act, ensuring the BC Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cowichan land title claim, Eby is now pretending to partially oppose. How can Eby, the Federal government or the City of Richmond be counted on to fight for land title rights for current property owners, when they all conspired to omit those very property owners, from the court case? 95% of British Columbia could be impacted by the precedence the Cowichan land title ruling presents in Richmond BC. The entire city of Kamloops has a land title claim against it. So it's impossible to ignore the devastating impact this could have on almost everyone in British Columbia who owns property or who has a mortgage / reverse mortgage on their property. This is especially true if lenders begin to refuse to provide loans to people who currently have loan agreements because the risks of lenders losing their loan investments, are too great.
2:32

🦅🏡⚖️ : David Eby lied to everyone 11 days ago about the BC Supreme Court ruling on Cowichan land title claims against private property owners, in Richmond British Columbia. 🧐Watch the full brief video as there are several clips added to provide full context. In the last clip hereditary Chief of Lyackson, Huy’wu’qw Shana Thomas, makes it clear, she wants Aboriginal title to apply to all the properties in the same way the Crown had title, when the Crown sold the property to the current land owners. Giving Aboriginal title would nullify the current land owners title and force them to make an agreement with whichever tribe regains land title, through the courts. Remember folks, some properties have multiple land title claims against the property, from multiple 1st Nation tribes. The major question is, why has David Eby not resigned? How many times can a Premier lie to taxpayers on critical issues? David Eby knew for years he could inform private property owners who have a land title claim against their property and he chose to keep them out of the process. This was an intentional act, ensuring the BC Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cowichan land title claim, Eby is now pretending to partially oppose. How can Eby, the Federal government or the City of Richmond be counted on to fight for land title rights for current property owners, when they all conspired to omit those very property owners, from the court case? 95% of British Columbia could be impacted by the precedence the Cowichan land title ruling presents in Richmond BC. The entire city of Kamloops has a land title claim against it. So it's impossible to ignore the devastating impact this could have on almost everyone in British Columbia who owns property or who has a mortgage / reverse mortgage on their property. This is especially true if lenders begin to refuse to provide loans to people who currently have loan agreements because the risks of lenders losing their loan investments, are too great.

Bruce McGonigal

40,507 views • 10 months ago

Flashback 16 years: Activist David Eby at the anti-Olympics rally, mic in hand, solemn face: "And why is it that we're holding these games on unceded native lands?" Fast-forward to an hour ago, Premier Eby: "And we're limited in what we can do about the Cowichan decision until the trial court is done with their determinations on the file." Classic. Spend years cheerleading "unceded/stolen land" activism, push policies that weaken private property rights and invite these rulings... then shrug and blame the courts when the chaos hits homeowners in Richmond Create the problem. Blame the courts. Class A blame-shifting narcissist David Eby
2:13

Flashback 16 years: Activist David Eby at the anti-Olympics rally, mic in hand, solemn face: "And why is it that we're holding these games on unceded native lands?" Fast-forward to an hour ago, Premier Eby: "And we're limited in what we can do about the Cowichan decision until the trial court is done with their determinations on the file." Classic. Spend years cheerleading "unceded/stolen land" activism, push policies that weaken private property rights and invite these rulings... then shrug and blame the courts when the chaos hits homeowners in Richmond Create the problem. Blame the courts. Class A blame-shifting narcissist David Eby

cbcwatcher

113,193 views • 4 months ago

🇨🇦🦅🏡 : British Columbia First Nations make it clear, they want to have title claim over all the property they're challenging for in court, across British Columbia and Canada. 🛑David Eby must resign at this point. David Eby tried to claim minutes earlier the Courts lied about private property rights being part of the court case. See the video I made earlier today on his statement. If the Province had no authority to sell you the land, then you could be forced to renegotiate terms of a lease with 1st Nations, for property you used to own.
1:42

🇨🇦🦅🏡 : British Columbia First Nations make it clear, they want to have title claim over all the property they're challenging for in court, across British Columbia and Canada. 🛑David Eby must resign at this point. David Eby tried to claim minutes earlier the Courts lied about private property rights being part of the court case. See the video I made earlier today on his statement. If the Province had no authority to sell you the land, then you could be forced to renegotiate terms of a lease with 1st Nations, for property you used to own.

Bruce McGonigal

288,770 views • 11 months ago

David Eby did not call an election. He struck a match Two years in, one-seat majority, a budget that already embarrassed itself, and a property-rights mess his government helped cook — then the Conservatives imploded, and suddenly the province needed “stability.” That is not leadership. That is a man smelling smoke in his own kitchen and sprinting for the door The fire is property title. His government sold UNDRIP theatre and Haida “templates,” then acted stunned when a court put Cowichan Aboriginal title above fee simple on private land in Richmond. Mortgages stalled. Sales froze. Homeowners got letters saying the deed might be junior to someone else’s claim. Then he posed as the defender of private property — after stacking the kindling Now he wants a snap vote a week after municipal elections, while the opposition is wounded on the floor And he had the gall to say this: “Living through wildfire season. Even if you never expected the fire to reach you… when you smell smoke, you don’t sit and wait… You cut a line through the forest… You build a firebreak.” You smell smoke, David, because you lit it. The firebreak is not Trump. The firebreak is an October 24 ballot designed to trap people in the house before they inspect the basement He is not cutting a line through the forest. He is locking the doors and calling the flames a mandate. Scumbag move Eby is not a premier, but an arsonist posing as the Fire Marshall David Eby
3:23

David Eby did not call an election. He struck a match Two years in, one-seat majority, a budget that already embarrassed itself, and a property-rights mess his government helped cook — then the Conservatives imploded, and suddenly the province needed “stability.” That is not leadership. That is a man smelling smoke in his own kitchen and sprinting for the door The fire is property title. His government sold UNDRIP theatre and Haida “templates,” then acted stunned when a court put Cowichan Aboriginal title above fee simple on private land in Richmond. Mortgages stalled. Sales froze. Homeowners got letters saying the deed might be junior to someone else’s claim. Then he posed as the defender of private property — after stacking the kindling Now he wants a snap vote a week after municipal elections, while the opposition is wounded on the floor And he had the gall to say this: “Living through wildfire season. Even if you never expected the fire to reach you… when you smell smoke, you don’t sit and wait… You cut a line through the forest… You build a firebreak.” You smell smoke, David, because you lit it. The firebreak is not Trump. The firebreak is an October 24 ballot designed to trap people in the house before they inspect the basement He is not cutting a line through the forest. He is locking the doors and calling the flames a mandate. Scumbag move Eby is not a premier, but an arsonist posing as the Fire Marshall David Eby

cbcwatcher

17,990 views • 9 days ago

David Eby is asked to respond to the BC Conservatives claim he is secretly negotiating a handover of vast chunks of the province to BC FNs. To paraphrase: Eby says the process is not secretive—adding that many of the negotiations began when John Rustad was in charge of the file.
1:31

David Eby is asked to respond to the BC Conservatives claim he is secretly negotiating a handover of vast chunks of the province to BC FNs. To paraphrase: Eby says the process is not secretive—adding that many of the negotiations began when John Rustad was in charge of the file.

Alex Zoltan

19,830 views • 1 month ago

David Eby SLAMS Mark Carney for favoring a separatist Premier and province over a province actually working with the Liberals to advance major projects. David Eby forgets to mention that he is actively working on giving away all of BC to the first nations.
1:02

David Eby SLAMS Mark Carney for favoring a separatist Premier and province over a province actually working with the Liberals to advance major projects. David Eby forgets to mention that he is actively working on giving away all of BC to the first nations.

Marc Nixon

10,119 views • 4 months ago

🚨We keep hearing claims that the Cowichan “don’t want” the affected Richmond PRIVATE PROPERTY. That misses the point entirely. The court has granted ABORIGINAL TITLE over the affected private property in RICHMOND. Whether the COWICHAN choose to exercise that right to that private property is irrelevant — the legal right now exists and may be accessed. This COWICHAN DECISION directly affects the families who own those affected private properties, and it should concern all British Columbians. With 95% of British Columbia exposed to Indigenous land claims, this ruling creates UNCERTAINTY that can be repeated in other communities across the province. The NDP government should have acted to protect PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS before this issue reached a court ruling.
1:12

🚨We keep hearing claims that the Cowichan “don’t want” the affected Richmond PRIVATE PROPERTY. That misses the point entirely. The court has granted ABORIGINAL TITLE over the affected private property in RICHMOND. Whether the COWICHAN choose to exercise that right to that private property is irrelevant — the legal right now exists and may be accessed. This COWICHAN DECISION directly affects the families who own those affected private properties, and it should concern all British Columbians. With 95% of British Columbia exposed to Indigenous land claims, this ruling creates UNCERTAINTY that can be repeated in other communities across the province. The NDP government should have acted to protect PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS before this issue reached a court ruling.

Steve Kooner MLA

10,167 views • 9 months ago

🦅🌊 : David Eby now says he agrees with the Federal government giving Aboriginal title to the 1,300 member Musqueam Band. A land title claim which includes the City of Vancouver. I warned everyone David Eby likely will use the Federal agreement to cookie cutter away most public land & coastal waters, to First Nations. I also warn March 3rd, the BC Supreme Court of Appeal may use the Federal recognition of land title, in their decision on the Cowichan land title appeal, for a developed portion of Richmond BC. That may very well pave the way for the elimination of private property rights in land claim zones. Apparently the minority Federal government can give away the land title of an entire region, without public consent or debate. The Provincial government feels this is so acceptable, it wants to mirror the practice. If you listen carefully to Eby, the new scheme is a system where people are too scared to invest in BC because there are too many parties that can veto a project. As we have recently seen, even when a project is 70% complete. That is a massive financial loss for any investor & a risk most will not take, without serious government help.
0:39

🦅🌊 : David Eby now says he agrees with the Federal government giving Aboriginal title to the 1,300 member Musqueam Band. A land title claim which includes the City of Vancouver. I warned everyone David Eby likely will use the Federal agreement to cookie cutter away most public land & coastal waters, to First Nations. I also warn March 3rd, the BC Supreme Court of Appeal may use the Federal recognition of land title, in their decision on the Cowichan land title appeal, for a developed portion of Richmond BC. That may very well pave the way for the elimination of private property rights in land claim zones. Apparently the minority Federal government can give away the land title of an entire region, without public consent or debate. The Provincial government feels this is so acceptable, it wants to mirror the practice. If you listen carefully to Eby, the new scheme is a system where people are too scared to invest in BC because there are too many parties that can veto a project. As we have recently seen, even when a project is 70% complete. That is a massive financial loss for any investor & a risk most will not take, without serious government help.

Bruce McGonigal

38,571 views • 7 months ago

Must watch! BC real estate lawyer, Tom Isaac, on the Cowichan ruling "What people don't seem to understand is the private land ownership, whether you like it or not... It is a cornerstone of Western economic prosperity." "You don't have a Western economy if you don't have private property ownership." "That is indefeasible by a democratically elected public government." "So this is a big, big deal for anyone, whether you're an indigenous government or a non indigenous government trying to attract capital to your land." "You want the concept of private property ownership upheld." Breakthrough Nation with Karen Restoule Karen Restoule David Eby Cassels
2:27

Must watch! BC real estate lawyer, Tom Isaac, on the Cowichan ruling "What people don't seem to understand is the private land ownership, whether you like it or not... It is a cornerstone of Western economic prosperity." "You don't have a Western economy if you don't have private property ownership." "That is indefeasible by a democratically elected public government." "So this is a big, big deal for anyone, whether you're an indigenous government or a non indigenous government trying to attract capital to your land." "You want the concept of private property ownership upheld." Breakthrough Nation with Karen Restoule Karen Restoule David Eby Cassels

cbcwatcher

26,054 views • 7 months ago

Someone needs to remind David Eby, while he wraps himself in the Captain Canada towel that Doug Ford discarded, that the BC non-profit group "Coastal First Nations" was funded and started with foreign US foundation money... and he keeps ignoring that fiction because their pipeline blocking is a cause dear to his heart If he stops backing this foreign funded group to oppose a northern pipeline, he stops being the reason many Albertans want to separate Don't expect David Cochrane or CBC to admit this truth! And once again, why isn't Eby on the hot seat for the property rights disaster for the rest of Canada? David Eby Brodie Fenlon
1:24

Someone needs to remind David Eby, while he wraps himself in the Captain Canada towel that Doug Ford discarded, that the BC non-profit group "Coastal First Nations" was funded and started with foreign US foundation money... and he keeps ignoring that fiction because their pipeline blocking is a cause dear to his heart If he stops backing this foreign funded group to oppose a northern pipeline, he stops being the reason many Albertans want to separate Don't expect David Cochrane or CBC to admit this truth! And once again, why isn't Eby on the hot seat for the property rights disaster for the rest of Canada? David Eby Brodie Fenlon

cbcwatcher

69,244 views • 8 months ago

Another NDP attempt to DEFLECT BLAME: David Eby is blaming the court for his government failing to argue EXTINGUISHMENT in the Cowichan tribes case. I’m sorry Premier, YOU implemented that strategic directive in 2019 as Attorney General. Thanks to YOU, Richmond residents face an emergency as to whether they still own their homes. This case will set a precedent for many homes across BC and Canada. WHOSE HOME IS NEXT?
0:26

Another NDP attempt to DEFLECT BLAME: David Eby is blaming the court for his government failing to argue EXTINGUISHMENT in the Cowichan tribes case. I’m sorry Premier, YOU implemented that strategic directive in 2019 as Attorney General. Thanks to YOU, Richmond residents face an emergency as to whether they still own their homes. This case will set a precedent for many homes across BC and Canada. WHOSE HOME IS NEXT?

Steve Kooner MLA

123,250 views • 11 months ago

SHOCKING TAKEOVER: DRIPA & Secret Agreements Are STEALING Private Property Homes RIGHT NOW!! A First Nation on British Columbia's central coast is asserting ownership over privately held lands, basing its legal challenge on a landmark ruling from last summer's B.C. Supreme Court decision that paved the way for Indigenous title claims against private property. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth explains how the BC NDP government, under Premier David Eby, is systematically stripping away your private property rights with Indigenous claims that now override the property you sweated for, saved for, built your dreams on, and thought was yours forever.
6:32

SHOCKING TAKEOVER: DRIPA & Secret Agreements Are STEALING Private Property Homes RIGHT NOW!! A First Nation on British Columbia's central coast is asserting ownership over privately held lands, basing its legal challenge on a landmark ruling from last summer's B.C. Supreme Court decision that paved the way for Indigenous title claims against private property. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth explains how the BC NDP government, under Premier David Eby, is systematically stripping away your private property rights with Indigenous claims that now override the property you sweated for, saved for, built your dreams on, and thought was yours forever.

Dan Dicks

14,874 views • 7 months ago

Thank you Global BC and Keith Baldrey for covering this story. ‘It’s All the Court’s Fault’ is the latest iteration of blame and deflection from this NDP government. In 2021, rushed and without-debate legislation was brought in by Attorney General Eby to have the intended outcome that we saw in the Gitxaala decision in December 2025. Now to say that the court erred in judgement, and has no place in reconciliation is laughable, but not funny. The Supreme Court may not grant leave and may very well uphold the judgement related to a law written and introduced by none other than: ~David Eby This unfolding story could literally be a Netflix Thriller. #bcpoli
1:57

Thank you Global BC and Keith Baldrey for covering this story. ‘It’s All the Court’s Fault’ is the latest iteration of blame and deflection from this NDP government. In 2021, rushed and without-debate legislation was brought in by Attorney General Eby to have the intended outcome that we saw in the Gitxaala decision in December 2025. Now to say that the court erred in judgement, and has no place in reconciliation is laughable, but not funny. The Supreme Court may not grant leave and may very well uphold the judgement related to a law written and introduced by none other than: ~David Eby This unfolding story could literally be a Netflix Thriller. #bcpoli

Scott McInnis MLA

18,515 views • 7 months ago

🚨From GROUND ZERO of the COWICHAN DECISION in RICHMOND, let me be clear: The Attorney General and Premier have FAILED my constituents — and they know it. A high-level EBY operative has been hand delivering letters NOW to families whose PRIVATE PROPERTY is on the line… yet they blame the courts for not notifying them SIX YEARS AGO? If you can serve letters now, you could have served them then. This isn’t law — it’s political damage control. And I’M DONE WITH IT. Attorney General Sharma. Premier Eby. ADMIT YOUR FAULT. RESIGN.
2:23

🚨From GROUND ZERO of the COWICHAN DECISION in RICHMOND, let me be clear: The Attorney General and Premier have FAILED my constituents — and they know it. A high-level EBY operative has been hand delivering letters NOW to families whose PRIVATE PROPERTY is on the line… yet they blame the courts for not notifying them SIX YEARS AGO? If you can serve letters now, you could have served them then. This isn’t law — it’s political damage control. And I’M DONE WITH IT. Attorney General Sharma. Premier Eby. ADMIT YOUR FAULT. RESIGN.

Steve Kooner MLA

15,944 views • 9 months ago

🚨FACTS MATTER Premier Eby, as Attorney General, RAMMED Section 8.1 of the Interpretation Act through committee stage with just 14 MINUTES of debate in 2021. AG Critic Michael De Jong KC was SILENCED from probing its TRUE INTENT. Now a court decision has applied Section 8.1 and Land Title Act protections for PRIVATE PROPERTY have been stripped, exposing landowners to ABORIGINAL TITLE claims. And Premier Eby is DODGING questions on why an opportunity wasn’t provided to explain Section 8.1's TRUE INTENT. What is he hiding?
1:10

🚨FACTS MATTER Premier Eby, as Attorney General, RAMMED Section 8.1 of the Interpretation Act through committee stage with just 14 MINUTES of debate in 2021. AG Critic Michael De Jong KC was SILENCED from probing its TRUE INTENT. Now a court decision has applied Section 8.1 and Land Title Act protections for PRIVATE PROPERTY have been stripped, exposing landowners to ABORIGINAL TITLE claims. And Premier Eby is DODGING questions on why an opportunity wasn’t provided to explain Section 8.1's TRUE INTENT. What is he hiding?

Steve Kooner MLA

11,065 views • 8 months ago

SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ALLOWED TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY? “People are waking up to the fact that the asset seizure tax is an elimination of private property rights, that fundamentally what you're saying [is] that private property now becomes public property. Because as soon as you give the government the right to collect your post-tax assets through a legislative vote, you are basically saying that you no longer have private property — because at any point in the future the government can vote to say I'm going to take your private property — which is different than an income tax. [An income tax] is when you earn something that you didn't have before, and they take a percentage of your earnings (of your income). The statement now is after you've made your income (it's now your private property) — they can come and take it. And so that is a distinction that has never existed in the United States. And I will make the retort right now to property tax, because people always say to me: ‘what about property tax?’ A property tax is a service fee on a particular, specific asset. The money that is collected provides services for that asset to make it more valuable. So you get roads, infrastructure, policing, fire, schools… All the stuff that comes with property tax makes that property [more valuable]. And you have the option at any point you want to sell that property and stop paying that property tax. You have the option at any point to downgrade your property and get a cheaper property and pay [a lower tax]. And here's the other important point about property tax: it’s uniform. Uniform means that everyone pays the same percentage, the same property tax rate in a county. This asset seizure tax that's being proposed is a demographic tax — meaning that the state or the legislature defines a specific group of individuals (in this case, they're saying anyone with a net worth over a billion dollars) and then they can go and take assets from only that group. That is nonuniform taxation. It means that for the first time we're saying based on the demographics of a person meaning whatever you want to use to define that person (in this case their wealth) — you are going to be treated differently. And that is different than an income tax, because remember when you have graduated income tax rates (and you say high earners get taxed more) — what you're taxing is the earnings, not the individual. You're not looking through to the individual to determine whether or not they're wealthy. All you're doing is looking at the independent earnings amount that's coming in. And so a uniformity clause is supposed to protect people from being demographically discriminated against. And you may roll your hand and be like: ‘Oh, who cares about the billionaires? Eat the rich. That's great.’ But fundamentally, you're giving the government, the legislature, the ability to in the future take any demographic definition they want and go in and take any percentage they want of after-tax property from you. That is why this is so troubling.” david friedberg The All-In Podcast
2:35

SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ALLOWED TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY? “People are waking up to the fact that the asset seizure tax is an elimination of private property rights, that fundamentally what you're saying [is] that private property now becomes public property. Because as soon as you give the government the right to collect your post-tax assets through a legislative vote, you are basically saying that you no longer have private property — because at any point in the future the government can vote to say I'm going to take your private property — which is different than an income tax. [An income tax] is when you earn something that you didn't have before, and they take a percentage of your earnings (of your income). The statement now is after you've made your income (it's now your private property) — they can come and take it. And so that is a distinction that has never existed in the United States. And I will make the retort right now to property tax, because people always say to me: ‘what about property tax?’ A property tax is a service fee on a particular, specific asset. The money that is collected provides services for that asset to make it more valuable. So you get roads, infrastructure, policing, fire, schools… All the stuff that comes with property tax makes that property [more valuable]. And you have the option at any point you want to sell that property and stop paying that property tax. You have the option at any point to downgrade your property and get a cheaper property and pay [a lower tax]. And here's the other important point about property tax: it’s uniform. Uniform means that everyone pays the same percentage, the same property tax rate in a county. This asset seizure tax that's being proposed is a demographic tax — meaning that the state or the legislature defines a specific group of individuals (in this case, they're saying anyone with a net worth over a billion dollars) and then they can go and take assets from only that group. That is nonuniform taxation. It means that for the first time we're saying based on the demographics of a person meaning whatever you want to use to define that person (in this case their wealth) — you are going to be treated differently. And that is different than an income tax, because remember when you have graduated income tax rates (and you say high earners get taxed more) — what you're taxing is the earnings, not the individual. You're not looking through to the individual to determine whether or not they're wealthy. All you're doing is looking at the independent earnings amount that's coming in. And so a uniformity clause is supposed to protect people from being demographically discriminated against. And you may roll your hand and be like: ‘Oh, who cares about the billionaires? Eat the rich. That's great.’ But fundamentally, you're giving the government, the legislature, the ability to in the future take any demographic definition they want and go in and take any percentage they want of after-tax property from you. That is why this is so troubling.” david friedberg The All-In Podcast

Ron Pragides 

258,567 views • 8 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: Gov. Ron DeSantis CONFIRMS property taxes must be abolished in Florida this November because Floridians will not be SLAVES to the government LFG! Needs 60% of the vote, then major relief is here! "Some people just believe that government has first dibs on your property and your income, and it's like, OK, you exist to satisfy government, and then you get the crumbs that are left over?!" "I think it's the other way around!" 🔥 "I think you work hard, you save, you invest, you acquire property, because you're doing what our founding fathers establish this country to do." "You're pursuing happiness, you're realizing your ambitions, and in part of that, if there's taxes to support government that will help you do that, then that's one thing, even though we don't like paying, we understand there's a small need for it." "But ultimately, government is supposed to exist to be able to ensure that that dream is ALIVE."
0:48

🚨 JUST IN: Gov. Ron DeSantis CONFIRMS property taxes must be abolished in Florida this November because Floridians will not be SLAVES to the government LFG! Needs 60% of the vote, then major relief is here! "Some people just believe that government has first dibs on your property and your income, and it's like, OK, you exist to satisfy government, and then you get the crumbs that are left over?!" "I think it's the other way around!" 🔥 "I think you work hard, you save, you invest, you acquire property, because you're doing what our founding fathers establish this country to do." "You're pursuing happiness, you're realizing your ambitions, and in part of that, if there's taxes to support government that will help you do that, then that's one thing, even though we don't like paying, we understand there's a small need for it." "But ultimately, government is supposed to exist to be able to ensure that that dream is ALIVE."

Eric Daugherty

26,296 views • 3 months ago

Dave Eby wants to hold tech companies to higher standards than the RCMP and mental healthcare workers. The shooter was known and volatile and they gave back the guns... but AI! "But we also want, when someone is planning a violent attack, that they don't get assisted by an AI and that the AI company that has that information brings it forward to police in a timely way so it can be prevented." Eby, as usual, points the finger at the wrong responsible party David Eby
0:29

Dave Eby wants to hold tech companies to higher standards than the RCMP and mental healthcare workers. The shooter was known and volatile and they gave back the guns... but AI! "But we also want, when someone is planning a violent attack, that they don't get assisted by an AI and that the AI company that has that information brings it forward to police in a timely way so it can be prevented." Eby, as usual, points the finger at the wrong responsible party David Eby

cbcwatcher

18,816 views • 7 months ago