Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

David Chalmers says we don't know what makes a system conscious, not in brains, not in AIs The hard problem applies to both. If both compute, why couldn't both be conscious? LLMs can look very human, but they're trained in ways humans never are "they imitate us, but we...

slow_developer's profile picture

Haider.

64,629 subscribers

26,951 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Anchor & photograph both are confuse. 😂 - Look like both are fresher in this fields, they don't know what question asked or not. 😭
0:51

Anchor & photograph both are confuse. 😂 - Look like both are fresher in this fields, they don't know what question asked or not. 😭

Sumit

70,357 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

David Chalmers says it is possible for an AI system to be conscious because the brain itself is a machine that produces consciousness, so we know this is possible in principle
0:32

David Chalmers says it is possible for an AI system to be conscious because the brain itself is a machine that produces consciousness, so we know this is possible in principle

Tsarathustra

526,587 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: We don’t know if the models are conscious. We are not even sure what it would mean for a model to be conscious. But we’re open to the idea that it could be.
1:31

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: We don’t know if the models are conscious. We are not even sure what it would mean for a model to be conscious. But we’re open to the idea that it could be.

Clash Report

32,344 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

"What we say is 'it's safe to imitate Christ in his love and gentleness, but it's not safe to imitate Him in His sarcasm or to imitate Christ in His biting cultural criticism.' It's safe to imitate him over there, but not over here. But I don't know any biblical grounds for that selectivity. If we're going to imitate Christ, we should imitate Christ."
6:51

"What we say is 'it's safe to imitate Christ in his love and gentleness, but it's not safe to imitate Him in His sarcasm or to imitate Christ in His biting cultural criticism.' It's safe to imitate him over there, but not over here. But I don't know any biblical grounds for that selectivity. If we're going to imitate Christ, we should imitate Christ."

Canon Press

73,761 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Mexico President AMLO responds to Republican invasion threats: "Either they change the way they're treating Mexico or we start an information campaign in the US to ensure not a single Hispanic vote goes to Republicans.. We are not a protectorate nor a colony of the US. We do not receive orders from anyone.. We don't produce fentanyl and we don't have fentanyl consumption. And we're very sorry for what's going on in the US but why don't they fight the US cartels that distribute the fentanyl? More thoroughly, why don't they look after their youth?"
2:10

Mexico President AMLO responds to Republican invasion threats: "Either they change the way they're treating Mexico or we start an information campaign in the US to ensure not a single Hispanic vote goes to Republicans.. We are not a protectorate nor a colony of the US. We do not receive orders from anyone.. We don't produce fentanyl and we don't have fentanyl consumption. And we're very sorry for what's going on in the US but why don't they fight the US cartels that distribute the fentanyl? More thoroughly, why don't they look after their youth?"

COMBATE |🇵🇷

724,559 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Rep. Eric Burlison believes the UFO coverup exists, not because the Govt is hiding secret technology, but because of the embarrassment of not knowing what they are. "We don't want our adversaries to know that we don't know" This is more confirmation that the UFOs we see are Galactic Federation, not a secret human UFO program. The dark forces on Earth don't want us to know that the light forces are in the crafts.
0:27

Rep. Eric Burlison believes the UFO coverup exists, not because the Govt is hiding secret technology, but because of the embarrassment of not knowing what they are. "We don't want our adversaries to know that we don't know" This is more confirmation that the UFOs we see are Galactic Federation, not a secret human UFO program. The dark forces on Earth don't want us to know that the light forces are in the crafts.

Kab

25,611 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Sergey Brin says we're asking the wrong question about AI It's not just "can it do what humans do?", it's "what can it do that humans cannot do?" We don't know if there's a ceiling to intelligence "humans evolved over millions of years, but AI is iterating in months"
1:04

Sergey Brin says we're asking the wrong question about AI It's not just "can it do what humans do?", it's "what can it do that humans cannot do?" We don't know if there's a ceiling to intelligence "humans evolved over millions of years, but AI is iterating in months"

Haider.

90,630 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨 “I don't know what Pakistanis think they're doing..... They are themselves a huge problem in the world of jihadi terrorism. But they can try. I'm not sure they'll be very successful.” — Israel's Special envoy Fleur Nahoum on Pakistan's role as mediator in West Asia war.
0:33

🚨 “I don't know what Pakistanis think they're doing..... They are themselves a huge problem in the world of jihadi terrorism. But they can try. I'm not sure they'll be very successful.” — Israel's Special envoy Fleur Nahoum on Pakistan's role as mediator in West Asia war.

South Asia Index

74,088 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

David Chalmers says philosophical zombies are already here. Some AI systems can pass as human in short Turing tests, and we still say they are not conscious. For decades, this was a thought experiment. Now it is starting to look like an empirical description. "We already have a kind of philosophical zombie in our midst. They've gone from science fiction to science fact." David Chalmers on Why Is This Happening with Chris Hayes
1:12

David Chalmers says philosophical zombies are already here. Some AI systems can pass as human in short Turing tests, and we still say they are not conscious. For decades, this was a thought experiment. Now it is starting to look like an empirical description. "We already have a kind of philosophical zombie in our midst. They've gone from science fiction to science fact." David Chalmers on Why Is This Happening with Chris Hayes

vitrupo

11,372 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

#WATCH | US President Donald Trump says, "They (Iran) are begging to make a deal, not me. They're begging to make a deal, and anybody who saw what was happening over there would understand why they want to make a deal. But they say, we're not talking to them... They're not fools. They're very smart, in a certain way. I say they're lousy fighters, but they're great negotiators. They are begging to work out a deal. I don't know if we'll be able to do that. I don't know if we're willing to do that. They should have done that four weeks ago. They should have done it two years ago. Or they should have done it when we first came into office..." (Source: The White House)
0:59

#WATCH | US President Donald Trump says, "They (Iran) are begging to make a deal, not me. They're begging to make a deal, and anybody who saw what was happening over there would understand why they want to make a deal. But they say, we're not talking to them... They're not fools. They're very smart, in a certain way. I say they're lousy fighters, but they're great negotiators. They are begging to work out a deal. I don't know if we'll be able to do that. I don't know if we're willing to do that. They should have done that four weeks ago. They should have done it two years ago. Or they should have done it when we first came into office..." (Source: The White House)

ANI

100,915 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Nobelist Hinton: "Ask a chicken, if you wanna know what life's like when you are not the apex intelligence" "If it ever wanted, you'd be dead in seconds" "We simply don't know whether we can make them NOT want to take over and NOT want to hurt us. It might be hopeless."
3:05

Nobelist Hinton: "Ask a chicken, if you wanna know what life's like when you are not the apex intelligence" "If it ever wanted, you'd be dead in seconds" "We simply don't know whether we can make them NOT want to take over and NOT want to hurt us. It might be hopeless."

lethalintelligence.ai

439,942 просмотров • 1 год назад

Joseph Campbell: You must have a room or a certain hour a day or so where you do not know what was in the newspapers that morning. You don't know who your friends are. You don't know what you owe to anybody. You don't know what anybody owes to you. But a place where you can simply experience and bring forth what you are and what you might be.
2:03

Joseph Campbell: You must have a room or a certain hour a day or so where you do not know what was in the newspapers that morning. You don't know who your friends are. You don't know what you owe to anybody. You don't know what anybody owes to you. But a place where you can simply experience and bring forth what you are and what you might be.

Ashwin Sharma

147,234 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Sam Altman says humans may not be smart enough to unlock biology's deepest secrets, but we don't have to be An intelligence a million times smarter than us could crack what we can't, then explain it in a way we can understand "we don't need to discover it, just understand it once someone does"
0:40

Sam Altman says humans may not be smart enough to unlock biology's deepest secrets, but we don't have to be An intelligence a million times smarter than us could crack what we can't, then explain it in a way we can understand "we don't need to discover it, just understand it once someone does"

Haider.

27,141 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

“We know only too well that what we are doing is nothing more than a drop in the ocean. But if the drop were not there, the ocean would be missing something.”
0:55

“We know only too well that what we are doing is nothing more than a drop in the ocean. But if the drop were not there, the ocean would be missing something.”

Tatepledge

420,615 просмотров • 3 лет назад

From the poet, David Whyte: Humans have an uncanny ability to know things about the world beyond their conscious awareness, long before they can articulate what's going on. He says: "I experienced this in the African brush on a walking safari, which are usually quite dangerous. On one walk, our guide suddenly stopped us. We'd come to a clearing, and he just stopped us immediately. He said, "Everyone, stop." We stood stock still for the longest time. Then a male lion put its head up just 20 yards away from us. We had to back out really slowly, but we were within charging distance. We were in a dangerous perimeter. Afterwards, I said to him, "What happened? How did you know there was a lion there?" He said, "I don't know. I just knew there was something there." So for him, it was probably the slight aroma, maybe a few molecules of lion, which he'd be familiar with, which his conscious mind couldn't understand. It could have been the way the grass was laid down. It could have been the spoor tracks that he saw only hazily. But all of those combined together were integrated at this central imagination that said, 'Lion, lion close.' We have this ability to bring together in very practical ways things which are not recognized by the strategic mind, rather than the conscious mind, because this is equally conscious. In fact, it's a deeper conscious. It pays a deeper, conscious attention to the world."
1:40

From the poet, David Whyte: Humans have an uncanny ability to know things about the world beyond their conscious awareness, long before they can articulate what's going on. He says: "I experienced this in the African brush on a walking safari, which are usually quite dangerous. On one walk, our guide suddenly stopped us. We'd come to a clearing, and he just stopped us immediately. He said, "Everyone, stop." We stood stock still for the longest time. Then a male lion put its head up just 20 yards away from us. We had to back out really slowly, but we were within charging distance. We were in a dangerous perimeter. Afterwards, I said to him, "What happened? How did you know there was a lion there?" He said, "I don't know. I just knew there was something there." So for him, it was probably the slight aroma, maybe a few molecules of lion, which he'd be familiar with, which his conscious mind couldn't understand. It could have been the way the grass was laid down. It could have been the spoor tracks that he saw only hazily. But all of those combined together were integrated at this central imagination that said, 'Lion, lion close.' We have this ability to bring together in very practical ways things which are not recognized by the strategic mind, rather than the conscious mind, because this is equally conscious. In fact, it's a deeper conscious. It pays a deeper, conscious attention to the world."

David Perell

18,218 просмотров • 1 год назад

"Are we here if we grow up in Chicago? Are we as close as we are if we grow up in Chicago? ... Many times we don't get what we want, we get what we need. That 1,000 square foot cinder block house gave us both what we needed to be able to be where we are right now." - Sterling Sharpe
4:51

"Are we here if we grow up in Chicago? Are we as close as we are if we grow up in Chicago? ... Many times we don't get what we want, we get what we need. That 1,000 square foot cinder block house gave us both what we needed to be able to be where we are right now." - Sterling Sharpe

Club Shay Shay

76,600 просмотров • 1 год назад

David Chalmers on why consciousness is science's greatest unsolved problem: Science has mapped subatomic particles, distant stars, the chemistry of life yet it remains almost completely silent on the one thing we know most directly: our own conscious experience. In a rare early interview, philosopher David Chalmers explains why: "Consciousness is at once the most familiar thing in the world and the most mysterious. Consciousness is what we start with when it comes to knowing the world. I know that I exist. I know that I'm conscious. Everything else is secondary." And yet, despite this intimacy, consciousness sticks out like a sore thumb in the scientific picture. Chalmers points to a deep irony: science has made extraordinary progress on phenomena that are extraordinarily remote: subatomic particles, distant galaxies, the molecular machinery of biology while making almost no progress on the one thing closest to us. Why? Because science, by design, eliminates the subjective. "To do proper science, you have to be objective. You have to eliminate anything subjective from the picture." He uses heat as the perfect example. Physics gives us a complete account of heat molecules in motion, energy transfer, temperature gradients. It explains every objective aspect of the phenomenon. But it never explains what hotness actually feels like. "Science doesn't actually give a theory of the conscious feeling of hotness." This is what Chalmers calls the Hard Problem of Consciousness. You can trace every neural signal from your heat sensor along your nerves into your brain and still have explained nothing about the subjective experience of feeling warm. As interviewer Jeffrey Mishlove puts it: you can't even do science without a conscious mind to observe, interpret, and make meaning of data. Consciousness is the precondition for science itself and yet science has no framework to account for it. Chalmers' conclusion is striking: The methods of science may need to be expanded. Consciousness might not be something science explains away. It might be something science has to learn to start with.
2:45

David Chalmers on why consciousness is science's greatest unsolved problem: Science has mapped subatomic particles, distant stars, the chemistry of life yet it remains almost completely silent on the one thing we know most directly: our own conscious experience. In a rare early interview, philosopher David Chalmers explains why: "Consciousness is at once the most familiar thing in the world and the most mysterious. Consciousness is what we start with when it comes to knowing the world. I know that I exist. I know that I'm conscious. Everything else is secondary." And yet, despite this intimacy, consciousness sticks out like a sore thumb in the scientific picture. Chalmers points to a deep irony: science has made extraordinary progress on phenomena that are extraordinarily remote: subatomic particles, distant galaxies, the molecular machinery of biology while making almost no progress on the one thing closest to us. Why? Because science, by design, eliminates the subjective. "To do proper science, you have to be objective. You have to eliminate anything subjective from the picture." He uses heat as the perfect example. Physics gives us a complete account of heat molecules in motion, energy transfer, temperature gradients. It explains every objective aspect of the phenomenon. But it never explains what hotness actually feels like. "Science doesn't actually give a theory of the conscious feeling of hotness." This is what Chalmers calls the Hard Problem of Consciousness. You can trace every neural signal from your heat sensor along your nerves into your brain and still have explained nothing about the subjective experience of feeling warm. As interviewer Jeffrey Mishlove puts it: you can't even do science without a conscious mind to observe, interpret, and make meaning of data. Consciousness is the precondition for science itself and yet science has no framework to account for it. Chalmers' conclusion is striking: The methods of science may need to be expanded. Consciousness might not be something science explains away. It might be something science has to learn to start with.

Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺

31,662 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

ELON: WE’RE DESCENDANTS OF STARS – BUT HOW DID WE BECOME CONSCIOUS? “I've thought a lot about what is consciousness. Where does consciousness arise? If you start at the beginning of the universe, assuming the standard model of physics is true, then you have this Big Bang, the matter condensing into stars, those stars exploding. A lot of the atoms that are in your body right now were once at the center of stars. Those stars exploded, recondensed. Fast forward 13.8 billion years, and here we are. And somewhere along that very long journey to us, consciousness arose. Or the molecules started talking to each other. And it begs the question of what is consciousness? Is everything conscious? Maybe. It's hard to say where along that line, there's no sort of discrete point where consciousness didn't exist and then suddenly does exist. It seems to be, maybe you have a condensation of matter that has a density of consciousness, we don't know. The real answer is, we don't know what consciousness is. But with Neuralink and the progress that the company's making, we'll begin to understand a lot more about consciousness.” Source: Neuralink Update, June 2025
1:16

ELON: WE’RE DESCENDANTS OF STARS – BUT HOW DID WE BECOME CONSCIOUS? “I've thought a lot about what is consciousness. Where does consciousness arise? If you start at the beginning of the universe, assuming the standard model of physics is true, then you have this Big Bang, the matter condensing into stars, those stars exploding. A lot of the atoms that are in your body right now were once at the center of stars. Those stars exploded, recondensed. Fast forward 13.8 billion years, and here we are. And somewhere along that very long journey to us, consciousness arose. Or the molecules started talking to each other. And it begs the question of what is consciousness? Is everything conscious? Maybe. It's hard to say where along that line, there's no sort of discrete point where consciousness didn't exist and then suddenly does exist. It seems to be, maybe you have a condensation of matter that has a density of consciousness, we don't know. The real answer is, we don't know what consciousness is. But with Neuralink and the progress that the company's making, we'll begin to understand a lot more about consciousness.” Source: Neuralink Update, June 2025

Mario Nawfal

55,256 просмотров • 1 год назад

The reason all kinds of idiotic things are happening on the planet is, people are not conscious that they are mortal. If you were conscious of your mortal nature, you will do only what truly matters to you. If all of us do only what truly matters to us, we will live in a wonderful world. #SadhguruWisdom
1:10

The reason all kinds of idiotic things are happening on the planet is, people are not conscious that they are mortal. If you were conscious of your mortal nature, you will do only what truly matters to you. If all of us do only what truly matters to us, we will live in a wonderful world. #SadhguruWisdom

Sadhguru

22,498 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

👀 "I don't know when it's gonna be... but we have got a 5-0 in us" Joe Smith and Jay Motty are both predicting wins for United in today's game against Brentford! 🤞🔴 #MUFC
1:26

👀 "I don't know when it's gonna be... but we have got a 5-0 in us" Joe Smith and Jay Motty are both predicting wins for United in today's game against Brentford! 🤞🔴 #MUFC

Stretford Paddock

78,797 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад