Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

.David Deutsch: Creativity is disobedience. By not recognizing that, by suppressing disobedience, you’re suppressing creativity—always. Apart from mass murderers or something. But even then, it’s only the actions of criminals that have to be suppressed. Their ideas are best dealt with in non-violent ways. So we need to make... show more

Arjun Khemani

33,646 subscribers

24,054 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Eğitim Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Yorum

Arjun Khemani profil fotoğrafı

Arjun Khemani1 yıl önce

Full conversation here:

Sean McClure profil fotoğrafı

Sean McClure1 yıl önce

@DavidDeutschOxf “unless they’re ideas about violence, intolerance, or suppressing the growth of knowledge.” This is the flaw in the mechanism. These words are always perverted to mean whatever suits those in power.

FORD Prefect profil fotoğrafı

FORD Prefect1 yıl önce

@DavidDeutschOxf Many times there are ideas which are very creative and it's execution is harsh but for few and beneficial for many. Those ideas should be executed

Amit kumar profil fotoğrafı

Amit kumar1 yıl önce

@DavidDeutschOxf When we don't believe in current explanation of a problem. We create new knowledge

Monetary Reset profil fotoğrafı

Monetary Reset1 yıl önce

@DavidDeutschOxf Either they have kompromat on Deutsch (like for sure will find they do for some scientists in Epstein's circle) or he's dishonest. Because the only alternative is that he just believes everything the IDF says, and that's telling of somebody real mental level.

Imhimanshu_18 profil fotoğrafı

Imhimanshu_181 yıl önce

@DavidDeutschOxf I'm sure the next noble winner will be. @DavidDeutschOxf

Georgia Bucea profil fotoğrafı

Georgia Bucea1 yıl önce

@DavidDeutschOxf Ideas alone are not harmful, our instincts are harmful. We can encourage intelectuals to act all we want but in reality, men of action are men of instinct. It's the way nature made us, we need to level up as a species By this I mean, we need gene editing

Suzanne / Polis Labs profil fotoğrafı

Suzanne / Polis Labs1 yıl önce

@DavidDeutschOxf This is why we at @suzanne_polis advocate a serious discussion of alternatives to mass public schooling, where obedience and conformity are programmed into students

Lars Herrmann profil fotoğrafı

Lars Herrmann1 yıl önce

@DavidDeutschOxf That was a great job by you. Seen some interesting interviews of David Deutsch - but this one stands out beyond the form of questions and answers. This helps to get through the bottleneck faster to understand his ideas.

Benzer Videolar

In Ag…… let’s be honest we know so very little, we just hope to capture a bit of knowledge each opportunity we get. We should learn from one another not cry about someone’s ideas because they are different then what you learned or were taught. History teaches us a lot, but it doesn’t mean you can’t move forward, it’s a constant cycle of learning. And no one learns without others! It’s a team game that we are all in together. The guy that says I can’t trust that guy as he sells that seed or that fertilizer or that foliar is going to see rough times. As learning is opening your eyes and ears to ideas, and adding them to your library full of knowledge from your own experiences. That’s how something improves. It’s not the same thing every year and it’s not changing everything all at once. It’s bringing ideas and practices together to make it all work and bridge the gap.

In Ag…… let’s be honest we know so very little, we just hope to capture a bit of knowledge each opportunity we get. We should learn from one another not cry about someone’s ideas because they are different then what you learned or were taught. History teaches us a lot, but it doesn’t mean you can’t move forward, it’s a constant cycle of learning. And no one learns without others! It’s a team game that we are all in together. The guy that says I can’t trust that guy as he sells that seed or that fertilizer or that foliar is going to see rough times. As learning is opening your eyes and ears to ideas, and adding them to your library full of knowledge from your own experiences. That’s how something improves. It’s not the same thing every year and it’s not changing everything all at once. It’s bringing ideas and practices together to make it all work and bridge the gap.

Jason Schley

13,556 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Jony Ive: “Ideas are always fragile” “Ideas—by definition—are always fragile. If they were resolved, they wouldn’t be ideas. They would be products that were ready to ship.” The legendary Apple designer continues: “I’ve come to learn that you have to make an extraordinary effort not to focus on the problems, which are implicated with any new idea. These problems are known. They’re quantifiable and understood. But you have to focus on the actual idea, which is partial, tentative, and unproven.” All new ideas have problems, and if you don’t suspend your disbelief and trust that you will find a solution, you will lose faith in your idea. “That is why criticism and focusing on the problems can be so damaging—particularly in the absence of a constructive idea. Remember, opinions are not ideas. Opinions are not as important as ideas. Opinions are just opinions.” Source: California College of the Arts

Jony Ive: “Ideas are always fragile” “Ideas—by definition—are always fragile. If they were resolved, they wouldn’t be ideas. They would be products that were ready to ship.” The legendary Apple designer continues: “I’ve come to learn that you have to make an extraordinary effort not to focus on the problems, which are implicated with any new idea. These problems are known. They’re quantifiable and understood. But you have to focus on the actual idea, which is partial, tentative, and unproven.” All new ideas have problems, and if you don’t suspend your disbelief and trust that you will find a solution, you will lose faith in your idea. “That is why criticism and focusing on the problems can be so damaging—particularly in the absence of a constructive idea. Remember, opinions are not ideas. Opinions are not as important as ideas. Opinions are just opinions.” Source: California College of the Arts

Startup Archive

112,426 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

"A society that is in the dark is a society that is not one that is going to win the war of ideas with the United States. But we have to be competent to everybody. This is not a TV show. This is real. This isn't fun & games. This is real." - GOP candidate Chris Christie on China

"A society that is in the dark is a society that is not one that is going to win the war of ideas with the United States. But we have to be competent to everybody. This is not a TV show. This is real. This isn't fun & games. This is real." - GOP candidate Chris Christie on China

NEWSMAX

32,681 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

How will AI reshape our creativity and the world around us? Earlier this year, we opened Season 3 with billΞ.eth from Ethereum for a conversation about what happens when the distance between imagination and execution starts to collapse. Billy spoke about a future where ideas can move from thought to form almost instantly, where creativity becomes less limited by tools, technical skill, or production bottlenecks, and more defined by taste, intention, and the ability to see clearly. In this clip, he reflects on how AI may change not only what we create, but how quickly the world around us can be redesigned once more people are able to turn ideas into reality at the speed of thought.

How will AI reshape our creativity and the world around us? Earlier this year, we opened Season 3 with billΞ.eth from Ethereum for a conversation about what happens when the distance between imagination and execution starts to collapse. Billy spoke about a future where ideas can move from thought to form almost instantly, where creativity becomes less limited by tools, technical skill, or production bottlenecks, and more defined by taste, intention, and the ability to see clearly. In this clip, he reflects on how AI may change not only what we create, but how quickly the world around us can be redesigned once more people are able to turn ideas into reality at the speed of thought.

RehashedDAO

64,872 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

“That’s how the liars win — by suppressing competition in the marketplace of ideas.” My quick take on the Cognitive Warfare by the “blob.”

“That’s how the liars win — by suppressing competition in the marketplace of ideas.” My quick take on the Cognitive Warfare by the “blob.”

S.L. Kanthan

16,831 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"The one thing that is not in short supply are good ideas; what has been in short supply is the humility by those who have ruined Nigeria to admit to the fact that they've run out of ideas." Dele Farotimi. A victim of Nigeria says Nigeria’s leaders have clearly run out of good ideas.

"The one thing that is not in short supply are good ideas; what has been in short supply is the humility by those who have ruined Nigeria to admit to the fact that they've run out of ideas." Dele Farotimi. A victim of Nigeria says Nigeria’s leaders have clearly run out of good ideas.

News Central TV

17,356 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

We asked Nadia Asparouhova about her new book ANTIMEMETICS. "It's about anti-memes, or self-censoring ideas." "These are ideas that we find interesting in the moment, but that somehow don't get popular, like taboos, forbidden ideas or cognitive biases."

We asked Nadia Asparouhova about her new book ANTIMEMETICS. "It's about anti-memes, or self-censoring ideas." "These are ideas that we find interesting in the moment, but that somehow don't get popular, like taboos, forbidden ideas or cognitive biases."

TBPN

22,676 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The free market of ideas is the best regulator. Good ideas are rewarded with more resources (people voting with their money), and bad or dangerous ideas lose resources and influence. A better form of wealth redistribution.

The free market of ideas is the best regulator. Good ideas are rewarded with more resources (people voting with their money), and bad or dangerous ideas lose resources and influence. A better form of wealth redistribution.

Brian Armstrong

66,912 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

.Naval: “The whole concept of degrowth is nonsense. Nobody actually engages in degrowth in their everyday life. Nobody lowers their standard of living. Nobody wants to be less fit. Nobody wants to be less healthy. Nobody wants to be less knowledgeable. Nobody wants less of anything. So the idea that society as a whole is going to go through degrowth is just a form of suicide. Now, these bad ideas are basically a tax on good ideas. But any society that chooses degrowth will simply be outcompeted by societies that don’t. And there are plenty of societies that are not going to degrowth themselves. You can go to rural India, rural China, or anywhere in that part of the world to see what a degrowth society looks like. It’s the pre-growth society—it’s the same thing. It’s high infant mortality. It’s malnutrition. It’s lack of access to health care. And again, it’s the fundamental mistake of saying, ‘Oh, we’re done. We’ve figured everything out, and we’re going to stop here and now. We’re just going to divide up the loot.’ Complete nonsense. Would you even go back 10 years in time and lose out on all the medicines, computing, knowledge, and travel that we’ve invented in the last decade? Absolutely not. I wouldn’t even go back to iPhone 14.”

.Naval: “The whole concept of degrowth is nonsense. Nobody actually engages in degrowth in their everyday life. Nobody lowers their standard of living. Nobody wants to be less fit. Nobody wants to be less healthy. Nobody wants to be less knowledgeable. Nobody wants less of anything. So the idea that society as a whole is going to go through degrowth is just a form of suicide. Now, these bad ideas are basically a tax on good ideas. But any society that chooses degrowth will simply be outcompeted by societies that don’t. And there are plenty of societies that are not going to degrowth themselves. You can go to rural India, rural China, or anywhere in that part of the world to see what a degrowth society looks like. It’s the pre-growth society—it’s the same thing. It’s high infant mortality. It’s malnutrition. It’s lack of access to health care. And again, it’s the fundamental mistake of saying, ‘Oh, we’re done. We’ve figured everything out, and we’re going to stop here and now. We’re just going to divide up the loot.’ Complete nonsense. Would you even go back 10 years in time and lose out on all the medicines, computing, knowledge, and travel that we’ve invented in the last decade? Absolutely not. I wouldn’t even go back to iPhone 14.”

Arjun Khemani

226,793 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

‘ Have you risked your career speaking out about the mRNA Jab?’ YES ‘Speaking the truth is not safe but NOT speaking the truth is even less safe’ We are fighting psychopathic entities that lie for profit, cause harm & are suppressing free speech. THAT’S the real enemy

‘ Have you risked your career speaking out about the mRNA Jab?’ YES ‘Speaking the truth is not safe but NOT speaking the truth is even less safe’ We are fighting psychopathic entities that lie for profit, cause harm & are suppressing free speech. THAT’S the real enemy

Dr Aseem Malhotra

712,442 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Sam Altman: “The good founders are people who have ideas all the time” “You can give a founder an idea and they can start a company. The problem is they need to come up with new ideas for the company basically every week. You have to come up with crazy new ideas and big changes all the time.” When Sam was at Y Combinator, they tried an experiment where they funded 20 teams of strong founders that didn’t have ideas but were otherwise really good. They all failed. “What we learned is that the good founders are people who have ideas all the time. There’s an intelligence component to this. There’s a creativity component to this. There’s an ability to think independent thoughts component to this. But whatever you want to call this - this particular kind of intelligence that leads to seeing problems in different ways and thinking of ideas that don’t yet exist but should - you’ve got to have that in a founder.” Video source: Y Combinator (2018)

Sam Altman: “The good founders are people who have ideas all the time” “You can give a founder an idea and they can start a company. The problem is they need to come up with new ideas for the company basically every week. You have to come up with crazy new ideas and big changes all the time.” When Sam was at Y Combinator, they tried an experiment where they funded 20 teams of strong founders that didn’t have ideas but were otherwise really good. They all failed. “What we learned is that the good founders are people who have ideas all the time. There’s an intelligence component to this. There’s a creativity component to this. There’s an ability to think independent thoughts component to this. But whatever you want to call this - this particular kind of intelligence that leads to seeing problems in different ways and thinking of ideas that don’t yet exist but should - you’ve got to have that in a founder.” Video source: Y Combinator (2018)

Startup Archive

93,460 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Sam Altman: “The good founders are people who have ideas all the time” “You can give a founder an idea and they can start a company. The problem is they need to come up with new ideas for the company basically every week. You have to come up with crazy new ideas and big changes all the time.” When Sam was at Y Combinator, they tried an experiment where they funded 20 teams of strong founders that didn’t have ideas but were otherwise really good. They all failed. “What we learned is that the good founders are people who have ideas all the time. There’s an intelligence component to this. There’s a creativity component to this. There’s an ability to think independent thoughts component to this. But whatever you want to call this - this particular kind of intelligence that leads to seeing problems in different ways and thinking of ideas that don’t yet exist but should - you’ve got to have that in a founder.” Video source: Y Combinator

Sam Altman: “The good founders are people who have ideas all the time” “You can give a founder an idea and they can start a company. The problem is they need to come up with new ideas for the company basically every week. You have to come up with crazy new ideas and big changes all the time.” When Sam was at Y Combinator, they tried an experiment where they funded 20 teams of strong founders that didn’t have ideas but were otherwise really good. They all failed. “What we learned is that the good founders are people who have ideas all the time. There’s an intelligence component to this. There’s a creativity component to this. There’s an ability to think independent thoughts component to this. But whatever you want to call this - this particular kind of intelligence that leads to seeing problems in different ways and thinking of ideas that don’t yet exist but should - you’ve got to have that in a founder.” Video source: Y Combinator

Startup Archive

133,523 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Life in Paris, a century ago. Observe how much feels familiar and how much impossibly remote. Notice the tables, chairs, hairstyles, fashions, flirtations, gestures. These are but the visible tip of the invisible differences that separate us from a century ago. What lies beneath is the intellectual climate that gave birth to this way of life, and was sustained by it. Marcel Proust, writing in Paris around this time, observed that the ideas of our surroundings stamp a whole generation with a certain cast of mind. "The influence we ascribe to environment is particularly true of an intellectual environment," he wrote. "Each of us is conditioned by an idea. There are far fewer ideas than men, therefore, all men with similar ideas are alike." How different were the ideas that animated 1920s Paris, and those that drive the 2020s on Earth? And in what ways are those ideas making life today happier—and worse?

Life in Paris, a century ago. Observe how much feels familiar and how much impossibly remote. Notice the tables, chairs, hairstyles, fashions, flirtations, gestures. These are but the visible tip of the invisible differences that separate us from a century ago. What lies beneath is the intellectual climate that gave birth to this way of life, and was sustained by it. Marcel Proust, writing in Paris around this time, observed that the ideas of our surroundings stamp a whole generation with a certain cast of mind. "The influence we ascribe to environment is particularly true of an intellectual environment," he wrote. "Each of us is conditioned by an idea. There are far fewer ideas than men, therefore, all men with similar ideas are alike." How different were the ideas that animated 1920s Paris, and those that drive the 2020s on Earth? And in what ways are those ideas making life today happier—and worse?

Benjamin Carlson

20,593 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Here’s the truth: ideas are driving everything—whether people realize it or not. In this clip, I explain how figures like Zohran Mamdani and Bernie Sanders consistently push a worldview—ideas that I believe are dangerous, destructive, and fundamentally at odds with liberty—while too many others get distracted by gossip, personality clashes, and meaningless noise. Across the United States—from Washington, D.C. to California, Texas, and beyond—we’re losing focus on what actually matters. I lay out why our ideas—grounded in life, liberty, individualism, merit, and free will—are stronger, more humane, and more enduring. But here’s the problem: we can’t win the battle of ideas if we’re not even engaging in it. Instead of debating principles, too many voices in media and podcasting are fixated on who said what about whom. That’s not debate—it’s distraction. It’s noise. It’s a spectacle that pulls us away from the real fight over the future of this country. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Here’s the truth: ideas are driving everything—whether people realize it or not. In this clip, I explain how figures like Zohran Mamdani and Bernie Sanders consistently push a worldview—ideas that I believe are dangerous, destructive, and fundamentally at odds with liberty—while too many others get distracted by gossip, personality clashes, and meaningless noise. Across the United States—from Washington, D.C. to California, Texas, and beyond—we’re losing focus on what actually matters. I lay out why our ideas—grounded in life, liberty, individualism, merit, and free will—are stronger, more humane, and more enduring. But here’s the problem: we can’t win the battle of ideas if we’re not even engaging in it. Instead of debating principles, too many voices in media and podcasting are fixated on who said what about whom. That’s not debate—it’s distraction. It’s noise. It’s a spectacle that pulls us away from the real fight over the future of this country. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

23,083 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

.David Deutsch: "Conventional pessimism is right that civilization has no guaranteed future, nor does our species. The overwhelming majority of civilizations and species that have ever existed are now extinct, including significantly every one of our cousin species, every species that has ever tried to survive by creating knowledge that was not in their genome. New explanatory knowledge, how to make clothes and fire and farming and to live the new ways of life that that enabled. That is our biological niche to survive through the exercise of creativity and we are the last species left in that niche. For such species, stasis is not available. We conquer problems by creating knowledge or they conquer us."

.David Deutsch: "Conventional pessimism is right that civilization has no guaranteed future, nor does our species. The overwhelming majority of civilizations and species that have ever existed are now extinct, including significantly every one of our cousin species, every species that has ever tried to survive by creating knowledge that was not in their genome. New explanatory knowledge, how to make clothes and fire and farming and to live the new ways of life that that enabled. That is our biological niche to survive through the exercise of creativity and we are the last species left in that niche. For such species, stasis is not available. We conquer problems by creating knowledge or they conquer us."

Deutsch Explains

14,422 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

To our establishment friends in the Democratic Party: the status quo is not working and cannot be defended. We will not shrink from big ideas. We are prepared to take on the big money interests who dominate society. And we know the American people are with us in that fight.

To our establishment friends in the Democratic Party: the status quo is not working and cannot be defended. We will not shrink from big ideas. We are prepared to take on the big money interests who dominate society. And we know the American people are with us in that fight.

Bernie Sanders

149,370 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

Deutsch Explains

143,913 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Elon Musk: We should let ideas compete, not suppress them. “I think we should embrace a diversity of views, and we should have reasonable arguments, and we should have debates. The essence of free speech is that ideas survive when they're competing ideas in the marketplace of ideas. And if somebody says something that's incorrect, then that can be corrected. That's what happens on the 𝕏 platform. People will say something, then others will add context to it, or they will correct it, or there will be a community note. This applies equally to the left and right. There's no thumb on the scale like there used to be. And there's no voice on the left that's been silenced, unlike in the past, where many voices on the right were silenced. But they just don't seem to like the idea that people on the right can say what they want to say within the bounds of the law, which is startling.” Pittsburgh, October 20, 2024

Elon Musk: We should let ideas compete, not suppress them. “I think we should embrace a diversity of views, and we should have reasonable arguments, and we should have debates. The essence of free speech is that ideas survive when they're competing ideas in the marketplace of ideas. And if somebody says something that's incorrect, then that can be corrected. That's what happens on the 𝕏 platform. People will say something, then others will add context to it, or they will correct it, or there will be a community note. This applies equally to the left and right. There's no thumb on the scale like there used to be. And there's no voice on the left that's been silenced, unlike in the past, where many voices on the right were silenced. But they just don't seem to like the idea that people on the right can say what they want to say within the bounds of the law, which is startling.” Pittsburgh, October 20, 2024

ELON CLIPS

10,690,933 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Friends, in our second reading this Sunday, Paul writes to Timothy, “Remember Jesus Christ, raised from the dead, a descendant of David: such is my gospel.” The Gospel is not the ethical teachings of Jesus or the doctrinal teachings of Saint Paul; the Gospel is Jesus himself. And Christianity is not a noble spiritual path or a set of ideas; it’s a relationship to Jesus. All those other things are great and follow from him—but it’s about him!

Friends, in our second reading this Sunday, Paul writes to Timothy, “Remember Jesus Christ, raised from the dead, a descendant of David: such is my gospel.” The Gospel is not the ethical teachings of Jesus or the doctrinal teachings of Saint Paul; the Gospel is Jesus himself. And Christianity is not a noble spiritual path or a set of ideas; it’s a relationship to Jesus. All those other things are great and follow from him—but it’s about him!

Bishop Robert Barron

33,922 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Peter Thiel on why having Aspergers is an advantage and Elon Musk on why needing to be liked is a real weakness. Thiel: Many of the more successful entrepreneurs seem to be suffering from a mild form of Asperger’s where it’s like you’re missing the imitation, socialization gene. We need to ask what is it about our society where those of us who do not suffer from Aspergers are at some massive disadvantage because we will be talked out of our interesting, original, creative ideas before they’re even fully formed. ‘Oh, that’s a little bit too weird, that’s a little bit too strange,’ and maybe I’ll just go ahead and open the restaurant that I’ve been talking about that everyone else can understand and agree with, or do something extremely safe and conventional. Elon: “I think it’s a real weakness to want to be liked. A real weakness. And I do not have that.”

Peter Thiel on why having Aspergers is an advantage and Elon Musk on why needing to be liked is a real weakness. Thiel: Many of the more successful entrepreneurs seem to be suffering from a mild form of Asperger’s where it’s like you’re missing the imitation, socialization gene. We need to ask what is it about our society where those of us who do not suffer from Aspergers are at some massive disadvantage because we will be talked out of our interesting, original, creative ideas before they’re even fully formed. ‘Oh, that’s a little bit too weird, that’s a little bit too strange,’ and maybe I’ll just go ahead and open the restaurant that I’ve been talking about that everyone else can understand and agree with, or do something extremely safe and conventional. Elon: “I think it’s a real weakness to want to be liked. A real weakness. And I do not have that.”

David Senra

137,900 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce