Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

.david friedberg: "Ten years ago China published half as many scientific journal papers as the United States. I believe last year China published 50% more. What's going on from a research perspective in China? How have they created this advantage?" ARPA-H Director Alicia Jackson : "What we've seen is...

HillValleyForum's profile picture

The Hill & Valley Forum

3,970 subscribers

47,770 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Elon Musk explains how data centers in Space could help the US compete with China in AI “Given that Chinese AI companies are doing as well as they are with a relatively small amount of compute, it seems that if they had a lot of compute, there’s a good chance they would be the leaders. The constraints on AI are essentially electricity and AI chips. China is very strong in digital AI, and it has far more electricity than the United States. In fact, China already has more electricity than the United States, Europe and India combined. The US government can prevent US companies from using Chinese models, but it can’t stop the rest of the world from using them. That won’t stop China from becoming the leader in AI. Digital intelligence comes down to how much AI compute, how many chips and how much electricity you have. The current constraint is electricity outside China. In China, the constraint is chips. China is also closer than most people realize to solving the lithography problem, which would enable it to make AI chips in very large volumes. Once we address the power constraint with AI data centers in space, the constraint will once again be chips outside China.”
4:51

Elon Musk explains how data centers in Space could help the US compete with China in AI “Given that Chinese AI companies are doing as well as they are with a relatively small amount of compute, it seems that if they had a lot of compute, there’s a good chance they would be the leaders. The constraints on AI are essentially electricity and AI chips. China is very strong in digital AI, and it has far more electricity than the United States. In fact, China already has more electricity than the United States, Europe and India combined. The US government can prevent US companies from using Chinese models, but it can’t stop the rest of the world from using them. That won’t stop China from becoming the leader in AI. Digital intelligence comes down to how much AI compute, how many chips and how much electricity you have. The current constraint is electricity outside China. In China, the constraint is chips. China is also closer than most people realize to solving the lithography problem, which would enable it to make AI chips in very large volumes. Once we address the power constraint with AI data centers in space, the constraint will once again be chips outside China.”

DogeDesigner

245,139 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 HOLY CRAP. Not only are Democratic Socialists of America members taking a PLEDGE to the Chinese Communist Party, but they are flown over and treated "LIKE ROYALTY" in China All of them should be forced to renounce their citizenship! SEN. JIM BANKS: "This is what they want to do to America. Turn it into communist China. And this letter by the leadership of DSA makes that very clear. They stand with socialist communist China and they want the rest of the world to take a page from China's playbook and become that."
1:38

🚨 HOLY CRAP. Not only are Democratic Socialists of America members taking a PLEDGE to the Chinese Communist Party, but they are flown over and treated "LIKE ROYALTY" in China All of them should be forced to renounce their citizenship! SEN. JIM BANKS: "This is what they want to do to America. Turn it into communist China. And this letter by the leadership of DSA makes that very clear. They stand with socialist communist China and they want the rest of the world to take a page from China's playbook and become that."

Eric Daugherty

59,054 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

"Why does our FDA still incentivize all of this innovation to go to China?" Tweets from Zach Weinberg: "You can go to China, you can run a first-in-human study in a Chinese population at a Chinese hospital, you get your result, and then you can take that result back to America and skip the line." "I don't have to redo that Phase 1 and Phase 2 in a Western nation. I can use my Chinese data to open a Phase 3 study here and go for an approval." "Think about the incentive structure for a US biotech. You have to go to China. There is no alternative path because you've got competition on the other side who is racing ahead with infrastructure that you can't use." "We don't inspect, we don't audit, we don't send inspectors to these clinical trial sites. We have no idea what's actually going on." The Hill & Valley Forum 2026 The Hill & Valley Forum
3:19

"Why does our FDA still incentivize all of this innovation to go to China?" Tweets from Zach Weinberg: "You can go to China, you can run a first-in-human study in a Chinese population at a Chinese hospital, you get your result, and then you can take that result back to America and skip the line." "I don't have to redo that Phase 1 and Phase 2 in a Western nation. I can use my Chinese data to open a Phase 3 study here and go for an approval." "Think about the incentive structure for a US biotech. You have to go to China. There is no alternative path because you've got competition on the other side who is racing ahead with infrastructure that you can't use." "We don't inspect, we don't audit, we don't send inspectors to these clinical trial sites. We have no idea what's actually going on." The Hill & Valley Forum 2026 The Hill & Valley Forum

The Hill & Valley Forum

61,915 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Jeff Rutledge "Well, let me first start by saying that I think this is a fundamental mistake by the prime minister in making this trip to try to set a new strategic partnership" "I think it puts us in a very dangerous position in terms of our conversations with the US who has been very explicit about their desire to isolate China." "...And I think that there will be lots of promises that will be made to the Canadian government in their visit to China this time, and I think very little of them will be followed through on because China has one goal here and that's defending and protecting their economy and promoting their economy. And their priorities have nothing to do with those of Canadians." Jeff Rutledge
1:40

Jeff Rutledge "Well, let me first start by saying that I think this is a fundamental mistake by the prime minister in making this trip to try to set a new strategic partnership" "I think it puts us in a very dangerous position in terms of our conversations with the US who has been very explicit about their desire to isolate China." "...And I think that there will be lots of promises that will be made to the Canadian government in their visit to China this time, and I think very little of them will be followed through on because China has one goal here and that's defending and protecting their economy and promoting their economy. And their priorities have nothing to do with those of Canadians." Jeff Rutledge

cbcwatcher

54,571 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Nvidia $NVDA CEO Jensen Huang was asked about a recent story that said he warned that China will beat the US in the AI race “That’s not what I said. What I said was China has very good AI technology. They have many AI researchers, in fact 50% of the world’s AI researchers are in China. And they develop very good AI technology. In fact, the most popular AI models in the world today, open-source models, are from China. So, they are moving very, very fast. The United States has to continue to move incredibly fast. And otherwise, otherwise – the world is very competitive, so we have to run fast.” (H/T Dan Nystedt)
0:42

Nvidia $NVDA CEO Jensen Huang was asked about a recent story that said he warned that China will beat the US in the AI race “That’s not what I said. What I said was China has very good AI technology. They have many AI researchers, in fact 50% of the world’s AI researchers are in China. And they develop very good AI technology. In fact, the most popular AI models in the world today, open-source models, are from China. So, they are moving very, very fast. The United States has to continue to move incredibly fast. And otherwise, otherwise – the world is very competitive, so we have to run fast.” (H/T Dan Nystedt)

Evan

1,946,920 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Chen Weihua: ‘People are waking up to the fact that the Western powers are the real threat to the world, NOT China🇨🇳.’ ‘US soft power is declining fast, Israel is one of the most hated countries in the world. The US global standing is declining. Just look at US allies, those leaders are visiting China. Obviously, they were coerced by the US administration. Many of them were, I would say are puppet states in a certain way. They have been manipulated by Washington for a long time against China, especially in the last few years. But now they are waking up. You have Mark Carney talking about rupture, middle power, and all these things. So the world is changing, obviously. More people are awakening, and they are awakening to the lies those Western nations told for years, repeatedly using their propaganda, smearing China and painting China as a threat to the world. But if you look at what has happened in the world in the last couple of years, it is not China. It is the United States. It is Israel. It is the G7. It is NATO. It is the Western powers who claim to be the international community.’ —Chen Weihua （陈卫华）, former EU Bureau Chief of China Daily, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
2:57

Chen Weihua: ‘People are waking up to the fact that the Western powers are the real threat to the world, NOT China🇨🇳.’ ‘US soft power is declining fast, Israel is one of the most hated countries in the world. The US global standing is declining. Just look at US allies, those leaders are visiting China. Obviously, they were coerced by the US administration. Many of them were, I would say are puppet states in a certain way. They have been manipulated by Washington for a long time against China, especially in the last few years. But now they are waking up. You have Mark Carney talking about rupture, middle power, and all these things. So the world is changing, obviously. More people are awakening, and they are awakening to the lies those Western nations told for years, repeatedly using their propaganda, smearing China and painting China as a threat to the world. But if you look at what has happened in the world in the last couple of years, it is not China. It is the United States. It is Israel. It is the G7. It is NATO. It is the Western powers who claim to be the international community.’ —Chen Weihua （陈卫华）, former EU Bureau Chief of China Daily, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

29,866 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Remember when Trump said that China "sought to identify US journalists who had reported negatively on the US president and pay them large sums of money to write more negative articles about him"? Natalie Winters tells me she has uncovered the identities of journalists she believes have participated in China's pay-for-play propaganda machine: "There's a sister group to [the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front] called the Committee of 100. It's a little more US-based, but I actually obtained — I just published the story — a leaked document from them. They unintentionally put it up on their website, and it was an internal trip report... where they were talking about five journalists that had gone to China. They were saying it was $60,000 a person that they were covering their expenses, and they were literally itemizing the ARTICLES that they got in return from these people after they came back, even having some of these journalists give them direct commentary and quotes about how these trips 'changed their perspective of China.' They're touring Huawei facilities, they're touring military bases, they're touring sanctioned companies. One trip participant, upon return, she literally published an article: 'China bashing is for losers.' You have another one praising everything that China has done on climate change. One warned that, 'decoupling from China would backfire.' A Washington Post editor literally published a story titled, 'Team Trump should be careful what it wishes for on China.' They said that China doesn't currency manipulate, TPP is great, the scrutiny of Huawei isn't misplaced. This is a direct quote: 'Americans should accept that large-scale manufacturing will never return to the United States.' Back in 2010, they were more focused on shaping how Americans viewed China... Now, it's more about attacking Trump, attacking people who are tough on China, shaping how Americans actually engage with our foremost adversary."
5:23

Remember when Trump said that China "sought to identify US journalists who had reported negatively on the US president and pay them large sums of money to write more negative articles about him"? Natalie Winters tells me she has uncovered the identities of journalists she believes have participated in China's pay-for-play propaganda machine: "There's a sister group to [the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front] called the Committee of 100. It's a little more US-based, but I actually obtained — I just published the story — a leaked document from them. They unintentionally put it up on their website, and it was an internal trip report... where they were talking about five journalists that had gone to China. They were saying it was $60,000 a person that they were covering their expenses, and they were literally itemizing the ARTICLES that they got in return from these people after they came back, even having some of these journalists give them direct commentary and quotes about how these trips 'changed their perspective of China.' They're touring Huawei facilities, they're touring military bases, they're touring sanctioned companies. One trip participant, upon return, she literally published an article: 'China bashing is for losers.' You have another one praising everything that China has done on climate change. One warned that, 'decoupling from China would backfire.' A Washington Post editor literally published a story titled, 'Team Trump should be careful what it wishes for on China.' They said that China doesn't currency manipulate, TPP is great, the scrutiny of Huawei isn't misplaced. This is a direct quote: 'Americans should accept that large-scale manufacturing will never return to the United States.' Back in 2010, they were more focused on shaping how Americans viewed China... Now, it's more about attacking Trump, attacking people who are tough on China, shaping how Americans actually engage with our foremost adversary."

Glenn Beck

123,071 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 Brandon Judd says “It’s Going to be Bad” when we learn why there are so many Illegal Chinese Military Aged Men in the US • Q: How do Chinese get out of China? —— A: They don’t have the money to get out of China… The cartels fund and smuggle them out of China. —— they pay the cartel back through slave labor, sex work, etc • Q: What about the military aged Chinese men? —— A: We don’t know what their purpose is here in the United States, but it’s going to be bad • Q: Do you believe the Chinese military aged men are being sent here by China? —— A: We believe so, yes. “Whether they’re spying on us or laying in wait… for some other purpose, we just don’t know.” Q: Does anyone monitor them or know where they are? —— A: No… when these people were released, we lose complete contact with them, unless they show up to their court appearances, which the majority of them do not.
1:40

🚨 Brandon Judd says “It’s Going to be Bad” when we learn why there are so many Illegal Chinese Military Aged Men in the US • Q: How do Chinese get out of China? —— A: They don’t have the money to get out of China… The cartels fund and smuggle them out of China. —— they pay the cartel back through slave labor, sex work, etc • Q: What about the military aged Chinese men? —— A: We don’t know what their purpose is here in the United States, but it’s going to be bad • Q: Do you believe the Chinese military aged men are being sent here by China? —— A: We believe so, yes. “Whether they’re spying on us or laying in wait… for some other purpose, we just don’t know.” Q: Does anyone monitor them or know where they are? —— A: No… when these people were released, we lose complete contact with them, unless they show up to their court appearances, which the majority of them do not.

MJTruthUltra

2,385,555 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

David Sacks says the US is beating China in every AI category except one: optimism "AI optimism in China is over 80%. They poll on the question, do you think AI will be more beneficial than harmful? Over 80% of Chinese people say yes. In the US that number is like 30%." "The US is ahead of China in every category except one, which is optimism. The biggest risk to us winning this AI race against China is doing something and shooting ourselves in the foot because we're so pessimistic about what AI might do."
0:33

David Sacks says the US is beating China in every AI category except one: optimism "AI optimism in China is over 80%. They poll on the question, do you think AI will be more beneficial than harmful? Over 80% of Chinese people say yes. In the US that number is like 30%." "The US is ahead of China in every category except one, which is optimism. The biggest risk to us winning this AI race against China is doing something and shooting ourselves in the foot because we're so pessimistic about what AI might do."

dnap

17,911 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

#WATCH | Washington, DC | On being asked by ANI if tariffs would be imposed on China for buying crude oil from Russia, US President Trump says. "... Right now, as of November 1st, China will have about 155% tariffs put on it. I don't think it's sustainable for them. I want to be nice to China. But China has been very rough with us over the years because we had presidents that weren't smart from a business standpoint... They allowed China and every other country to take advantage of us. I made a deal with the European Union. I made a deal with Japan and South Korea. A lot of these deals are great deals... It's about national security. I was able to do it because of tariffs. We're getting hundreds of billions, even trillions of dollars paid into the United States... We'll start paying off debt..." (Source: The White House)
2:20

#WATCH | Washington, DC | On being asked by ANI if tariffs would be imposed on China for buying crude oil from Russia, US President Trump says. "... Right now, as of November 1st, China will have about 155% tariffs put on it. I don't think it's sustainable for them. I want to be nice to China. But China has been very rough with us over the years because we had presidents that weren't smart from a business standpoint... They allowed China and every other country to take advantage of us. I made a deal with the European Union. I made a deal with Japan and South Korea. A lot of these deals are great deals... It's about national security. I was able to do it because of tariffs. We're getting hundreds of billions, even trillions of dollars paid into the United States... We'll start paying off debt..." (Source: The White House)

ANI

48,752 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Only men do not want to agree to that. "I think that the United States needs to be more like China because China is the safest country I have ever been to in my entire life, and it is because of the amount of surveillance that they have. Everybody always likes to talk about how China is so scary because of their surveillance. No, that is literally why it is so safe. That is why I can travel here as a woman by myself. I've been to over 50 countries, and I can confidently say that I feel more safe as a woman because of the security that is in place in this country.”
1:27

Only men do not want to agree to that. "I think that the United States needs to be more like China because China is the safest country I have ever been to in my entire life, and it is because of the amount of surveillance that they have. Everybody always likes to talk about how China is so scary because of their surveillance. No, that is literally why it is so safe. That is why I can travel here as a woman by myself. I've been to over 50 countries, and I can confidently say that I feel more safe as a woman because of the security that is in place in this country.”

Johannes Maria

32,866 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Tianliang Zhang just delivered an ominous warning. President Trump’s trade war against China came too late to have any real impact. “40 to 50% of the manufacturing of the whole world is now done in China.” “They have already achieved the goal.” “Trump has this tariff war last year, but immediately he backed down because our rare earths [are] dependent on China.” “90% of antibiotics [are] from China.” “The chips in our weapons, 40% of them were produced by China.” “If there is a war between China and the United States, we need to buy our weapons from our enemy.” Tianliang Zhang 章天亮
1:53

Tianliang Zhang just delivered an ominous warning. President Trump’s trade war against China came too late to have any real impact. “40 to 50% of the manufacturing of the whole world is now done in China.” “They have already achieved the goal.” “Trump has this tariff war last year, but immediately he backed down because our rare earths [are] dependent on China.” “90% of antibiotics [are] from China.” “The chips in our weapons, 40% of them were produced by China.” “If there is a war between China and the United States, we need to buy our weapons from our enemy.” Tianliang Zhang 章天亮

Jan Jekielek

40,273 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

Prof. Zhang Weiwei: ‘The rise of Trump is a result of American corporations making HUGE PROFITS in China🇨🇳 and the US🇺🇸 political system only distributing wealth to OLIGARCHS.’ ‘Thousands of American companies, including Apple, Tesla and Microsoft all invest in China, those have their business interests in China. The problem with this rise of Donald Trump and MAGA movement had to do with the American political system because these companies have made huge profits in the Chinese market… Yet domestically their wealth distribution is so poor, is so in favour of the super-rich oligarchies, as a result we saw the rise of MAGA. Now with this trade war and tech war against China and on the losing side for the United States, many of these high tech companies want to come to China to try to at least keep the last part or whatever share of their business interests in China. They want to consolidate their interests in China. For instance China has not purchased any Boeings over the past nine years. So Boeing’s CEO visited China.’ —Prof. Zhang Weiwei, Former Translator for Chinese Paramount Leader Deng Xiaoping, and Director of Fudan University’s China Institute Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
2:09

Prof. Zhang Weiwei: ‘The rise of Trump is a result of American corporations making HUGE PROFITS in China🇨🇳 and the US🇺🇸 political system only distributing wealth to OLIGARCHS.’ ‘Thousands of American companies, including Apple, Tesla and Microsoft all invest in China, those have their business interests in China. The problem with this rise of Donald Trump and MAGA movement had to do with the American political system because these companies have made huge profits in the Chinese market… Yet domestically their wealth distribution is so poor, is so in favour of the super-rich oligarchies, as a result we saw the rise of MAGA. Now with this trade war and tech war against China and on the losing side for the United States, many of these high tech companies want to come to China to try to at least keep the last part or whatever share of their business interests in China. They want to consolidate their interests in China. For instance China has not purchased any Boeings over the past nine years. So Boeing’s CEO visited China.’ —Prof. Zhang Weiwei, Former Translator for Chinese Paramount Leader Deng Xiaoping, and Director of Fudan University’s China Institute Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

48,430 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Chinese think tank analyst Victor Gao, in an interview with Channel 4 News, said that China is fully prepared to fight to the very end "because the world is big enough that the United States is not the totality of the market in the world." The host noted that if the US shuts itself out of the China market, China will lose 15% in trade, to which Gao responded: "We don't care. China has been here for 5,000 years. Most of the time, there was no United States, and we survived. And if the United States wants to bully China, we will deal with the situation without the United States. And we expect to survive for another 5,000 years."
0:40

Chinese think tank analyst Victor Gao, in an interview with Channel 4 News, said that China is fully prepared to fight to the very end "because the world is big enough that the United States is not the totality of the market in the world." The host noted that if the US shuts itself out of the China market, China will lose 15% in trade, to which Gao responded: "We don't care. China has been here for 5,000 years. Most of the time, there was no United States, and we survived. And if the United States wants to bully China, we will deal with the situation without the United States. And we expect to survive for another 5,000 years."

Anton Gerashchenko

169,664 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“China makes almost all of the windmills, and yet I haven’t been able to find any wind farms in China. Did you ever think of that? That’s a good way of looking at it. They’re smart, China is very smart... They sell them for a fortune. They sell them to the stupid people that buy them.” —Trump
0:31

“China makes almost all of the windmills, and yet I haven’t been able to find any wind farms in China. Did you ever think of that? That’s a good way of looking at it. They’re smart, China is very smart... They sell them for a fortune. They sell them to the stupid people that buy them.” —Trump

Crooked Media

61,119 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten