Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🚨 DAVID MILIBAND WHINES ON CAMERA THAT BRITAIN IS NOT SENDING ENOUGH FOREIGN AID BILLIONS ABROAD Watch this clip and tell me these establishment elites have any connection to the real world. Former Foreign Secretary David Miliband went on television complaining that trimming overseas foreign aid spending is bloody... frustrating. This man sits in New York pocketing an enormous executive salary running an international charity, yet he thinks he can lecture struggling British workers on morality. Our pensioners are terrified of heating bills, thousands of British military veterans face homelessness, and our public services are crumbling. Yet the Miliband dynasty genuinely believes your hard earned wages should be shipped overseas to fund foreign projects rather than fixing Great Britain first. These globetrotting socialists will never care about ordinary taxpayers because they do not have to live with the economic wreckage they leave behind. Retweet this immediately if you believe British tax money should be spent on British citizens first. 🇬🇧🔥show more

David Shaw

12,758 subscribers

74,209 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Finanzen

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

34 Kommentare

Profilbild von Polly

Pollyvor 4 Tagen

David Miliband is yet another of George Soros' many fixers and arranged the Climate Change Act which Soros wanted. He's got a £1million Soros linked CEO job. George and Alex Soros want international aid and are at the heart of Labour. Liz Truss was right.

Profilbild von Frank Carberry

Frank Carberryvor 4 Tagen

This is a man who's being paid 1,25 million dollars plus other benefits as head of a charity. He clearly believes charity begins at home, his home. Why doesn't he give some of that in aid.

Profilbild von Maxine

Maxinevor 3 Tagen

Stop all foreign aid most of them are here anyway taking everything they can get their hands on

Profilbild von David Bilson

David Bilsonvor 4 Tagen

He is as mad and deluded as his brother.

Profilbild von Peter Orem

Peter Oremvor 3 Tagen

You left out a step. IRC is funded in part by the UK government. He's demanding more money for his 'charity', some of which he will take as personal pay.

Profilbild von Lex Luthor

Lex Luthorvor 4 Tagen

"This man sits in New York pocketing an enormous executive salary running an international charity" This is all u need to know

Profilbild von T Harrison

T Harrisonvor 4 Tagen

David &/or Ed Milliband. Totally out of touch and lecturing on how to destroy Britain. They’re not just idealistic, they’re dangerous and corrosive and are ignoring the realities of life. Britain is being bankrupted by social services for immigrants and too much overseas aide.

Profilbild von Nic Doczi

Nic Doczivor 4 Tagen

I can see why revolutions happened.

Profilbild von 🇬🇧🇬🇧LUMA🇬🇧🇬🇧FAR RIGHT!🇬🇧🇬🇧

🇬🇧🇬🇧LUMA🇬🇧🇬🇧FAR RIGHT!🇬🇧🇬🇧vor 4 Tagen

We’re skint mate - FFS.

Profilbild von Ian Ward

Ian Wardvor 4 Tagen

David Millibrain & Ed Millibrain are as senseless as each other. Where do these 2 clowns think all the money, they want UK Govt to give away, comes from? They clearly don't have any fiscal responsibility

Profilbild von Lhpb

Lhpbvor 3 Tagen

His best buddy is #GeorgeSoros. Explains everything...

Profilbild von EnglishLady14298310

EnglishLady14298310vor 4 Tagen

Deranged, just like his brother.

Profilbild von Rolly

Rollyvor 4 Tagen

Get stuffed! @davidmilliband

Profilbild von Eloise

Eloisevor 3 Tagen

Since the 1950 billions have been sent to Africa but it has not taken any out of poverty.

Profilbild von Manuella Machado

Manuella Machadovor 3 Tagen

Is he prepared to give a few millions of his own? No, I don’t think so.

Profilbild von Polarman

Polarmanvor 4 Tagen

These people are clueless about what ordinary UK citizens are facing. Overseas aid in money should stop until the many priblems in UK are dealt with.

Profilbild von John M Calvert

John M Calvertvor 3 Tagen

What more can you expect from a man who has no commercial competence at all. He also has no personal charisma.

Profilbild von Maisie

Maisievor 4 Tagen

How much does he earn from his charity???

Profilbild von MsMolly188.

MsMolly188.vor 3 Tagen

He has the same mad look as his brother! With 3 trillion of debt in UK this arsehole STILL wants more money sent to charity (which I expect he is rewarded handsomely) FCUK the people of UK who have to fund this along with funding all the illegals. He & brother can just DO ONE

Profilbild von Quincunx

Quincunxvor 4 Tagen

He's been drinking Blair's koolaid.

Profilbild von WSL

WSLvor 3 Tagen

He lives and (presumably) pays taxes in the USA. He has no right to comment on the distribution of UK taxpayers’ money.

Profilbild von ZOMBIE69

ZOMBIE69vor 4 Tagen

He's a tax dodger like his idiot brother

Profilbild von 🤔

🤔vor 3 Tagen

@jane798m How about Miliband donates his salary

Profilbild von @andy3cunny

@andy3cunnyvor 4 Tagen

Just like his daft brother another career corrupt clown @Ed_Miliband neither are very bright both snake oil salesman at best I wouldn’t employ that pair of snakes to put my bins out !

Profilbild von Stuart Oddie

Stuart Oddievor 3 Tagen

Follow the money ,all this aid , all these thespians are getting a very nice taste ,stashing it away for when the shit hits the fan .

Profilbild von Ali Mazen

Ali Mazenvor 3 Tagen

International socialism….the excuse is that Britain is spending too much money on all the wrong priorities and so the aid budget is unaffordable.

Profilbild von Jonathan Roberts

Jonathan Robertsvor 3 Tagen

I'm perfectly happy for Ed and David Milliband to send as much as there iwn money abroad as they like. There are charitable organisations rmthat will take it. They shouldn't be taxing a nations workforce to do something they aren't prepared to do themselves

Profilbild von jacquie birbeck

jacquie birbeckvor 4 Tagen

Look up their father's details. He was classed as 'the man who hates britain'

Profilbild von Jenny Reader

Jenny Readervor 3 Tagen

He is paid £1 million a year.

Profilbild von Mon Matharu

Mon Matharuvor 3 Tagen

He should be talking to his brother Ed Miliband and labour Govt to reverse the scams of Net Zero / Climate change / C4O

Profilbild von millett445 🇬🇧

millett445 🇬🇧vor 3 Tagen

They are completely off their trolleys. Is he trying to speed up bankrupting us?

Profilbild von IanM

IanMvor 3 Tagen

What an absolute snake.

Profilbild von Rosebud

Rosebudvor 3 Tagen

Disgusting bstd. Get these twts out. We shouldn’t send any considering we pay to our money already to keep the immigrants in benefits houses etc

Profilbild von David R

David Rvor 3 Tagen

I used to believe that David was the semsible brother

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 WES STREETING THINKS SURRENDERING BRITISH TERRITORY IS A MASTERCLASS IN NATIONAL SECURITY Watch this clip and tell me Westminster politicians have not completely lost their minds Wes Streeting sat on television with a straight face and claimed that surrendering the Chagos Islands secures the long term future of our military base on Diego Garcia. Let me translate that bureaucratic nonsense into plain Nottingham common sense. Labour is giving away sovereign British territory and then forcing British taxpayers to shell out billions of pounds just to rent back our own base!!! If surrendering British sovereign land provides security, why stop there, Wes? Why not hand the Falklands over to Argentina and gift Gibraltar to Spain while you are at it? While Andy Burnham cuts our regular army to just 70,000 troops and John Healey starves our frontline regiments of gear, Labour is paying foreign powers for the privilege of humiliating Great Britain on the global stage. This is not strategic stability! This is the pathetic, managed decline of a once great power orchestrated by ministers who would rather surrender to foreign courts than defend the British Crown. Share this video right now if you are sick of spineless politicians giving away our country. 🇬🇧🔥

🚨 WES STREETING THINKS SURRENDERING BRITISH TERRITORY IS A MASTERCLASS IN NATIONAL SECURITY Watch this clip and tell me Westminster politicians have not completely lost their minds Wes Streeting sat on television with a straight face and claimed that surrendering the Chagos Islands secures the long term future of our military base on Diego Garcia. Let me translate that bureaucratic nonsense into plain Nottingham common sense. Labour is giving away sovereign British territory and then forcing British taxpayers to shell out billions of pounds just to rent back our own base!!! If surrendering British sovereign land provides security, why stop there, Wes? Why not hand the Falklands over to Argentina and gift Gibraltar to Spain while you are at it? While Andy Burnham cuts our regular army to just 70,000 troops and John Healey starves our frontline regiments of gear, Labour is paying foreign powers for the privilege of humiliating Great Britain on the global stage. This is not strategic stability! This is the pathetic, managed decline of a once great power orchestrated by ministers who would rather surrender to foreign courts than defend the British Crown. Share this video right now if you are sick of spineless politicians giving away our country. 🇬🇧🔥

David Shaw

16,394 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Owen Jones Declares: British Homeless Can Wait, Foreigners Come First 😡 That snivelling little woke worm Owen Jones just exposed himself on live TV. British caller: “There should be an election now, because we’re spending so much money abroad… We’ve got veterans that are lying sleeping rough and we’ve got foreigners getting paid… throwing money left, right and centre. Where’s the priorities here?” Owen Jones sneers back: “We’ve got a housing crisis and we should be dealing with it… Building council housing… That’s an important thing but I don’t think this should be at the expense of people abroad.” ARE YOU F*CKING KIDDING ME?! 😡 This parasite literally just said: Screw homeless British veterans sleeping rough. Screw families stuck in hotel rooms. Screw young Brits who can’t get on the housing ladder. Keep the foreign aid gravy train flowing first, even if it means our own people suffer. Owen Jones would rather see British soldiers begging in doorways than cut one single penny sent overseas. This is the modern left in one clip: Britain and its people come dead last. Their feelings and virtue-signalling matter more than our veterans’ lives or our own citizens’ roofs over their heads. Disgusting. Priorities this twisted should disqualify anyone from public influence.

Owen Jones Declares: British Homeless Can Wait, Foreigners Come First 😡 That snivelling little woke worm Owen Jones just exposed himself on live TV. British caller: “There should be an election now, because we’re spending so much money abroad… We’ve got veterans that are lying sleeping rough and we’ve got foreigners getting paid… throwing money left, right and centre. Where’s the priorities here?” Owen Jones sneers back: “We’ve got a housing crisis and we should be dealing with it… Building council housing… That’s an important thing but I don’t think this should be at the expense of people abroad.” ARE YOU F*CKING KIDDING ME?! 😡 This parasite literally just said: Screw homeless British veterans sleeping rough. Screw families stuck in hotel rooms. Screw young Brits who can’t get on the housing ladder. Keep the foreign aid gravy train flowing first, even if it means our own people suffer. Owen Jones would rather see British soldiers begging in doorways than cut one single penny sent overseas. This is the modern left in one clip: Britain and its people come dead last. Their feelings and virtue-signalling matter more than our veterans’ lives or our own citizens’ roofs over their heads. Disgusting. Priorities this twisted should disqualify anyone from public influence.

J Stewart

42,669 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

British woman speaks about illegal migrants and taxes. Just saying this could get her arrested by their liberal government “Reports are saying that 1.9 million foreign nationals are claiming benefits in Britain and we have spent nearly £25 billion on migrant benefits. Like, how did this become a thing? This is our money. This is taxpayers' money going towards benefits for people who come to this country and don't even work. There are British people who are struggling to pay their bills because their taxes have increased — If there are around six million foreign nationals living in this country, that means that 30% of them are claiming benefits. This should not be allowed under any circumstances.” And this data is just what they’re reporting, it’s likely MUCH higher

British woman speaks about illegal migrants and taxes. Just saying this could get her arrested by their liberal government “Reports are saying that 1.9 million foreign nationals are claiming benefits in Britain and we have spent nearly £25 billion on migrant benefits. Like, how did this become a thing? This is our money. This is taxpayers' money going towards benefits for people who come to this country and don't even work. There are British people who are struggling to pay their bills because their taxes have increased — If there are around six million foreign nationals living in this country, that means that 30% of them are claiming benefits. This should not be allowed under any circumstances.” And this data is just what they’re reporting, it’s likely MUCH higher

Wall Street Apes

47,324 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Baroness Foster of Oxton exposed how British taxpayers are being forced to fund the jihadists in the Middle East. £101 million given to the Palestinians, at the expense of British taxpayers. The British government knows the Palestinian Authority uses the money to pay terrorists and family members of suicide bombers as part of the infamous “Pay for Slay” policy. They do not condition the aid on stopping terrorism because Keir Starmer cannot afford to be called “Islamophobic” by his Muslim voters or the Palestinian leaders. He appeases the jihadists by promoting terror against Jews. This is not foreign aid. This is British taxpayers subsidizing the murder of Jews. The Palestinian Authority has a formal system that rewards terrorists with monthly salaries — the more Jews they kill, the higher the payment. Suicide bombers’ families receive lifetime pensions. This is blood money, and Britain is helping to pay it.

Baroness Foster of Oxton exposed how British taxpayers are being forced to fund the jihadists in the Middle East. £101 million given to the Palestinians, at the expense of British taxpayers. The British government knows the Palestinian Authority uses the money to pay terrorists and family members of suicide bombers as part of the infamous “Pay for Slay” policy. They do not condition the aid on stopping terrorism because Keir Starmer cannot afford to be called “Islamophobic” by his Muslim voters or the Palestinian leaders. He appeases the jihadists by promoting terror against Jews. This is not foreign aid. This is British taxpayers subsidizing the murder of Jews. The Palestinian Authority has a formal system that rewards terrorists with monthly salaries — the more Jews they kill, the higher the payment. Suicide bombers’ families receive lifetime pensions. This is blood money, and Britain is helping to pay it.

Liza Rosen

77,469 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The most astonishing and irritating statistic you will ever hear. Who does removing the child benefit cap really benefit? Well it is NOT hard working British citizens. Only an incredible 0.8% of those getting extra money from this will be both British and working. That means 99.2% are either NOT British or NOT working. So we are paying for foreign citizens to have more children or people on welfare to have more Children. It’s a policy that perpetuates the doom loop we are in. It should be 100% the other way around. INCENTIVISE hard working , striving BRITISH parents to have more kids and 100% remove ALL benefits for foreign citizens and keep the cap at 2 for those on welfare. It’s bloody obvious….🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️😡 Proud Geordie Rupert Lowe MP Ben Habib Advance UK Restore Britain Nigel Farage MP GB News Talk

The most astonishing and irritating statistic you will ever hear. Who does removing the child benefit cap really benefit? Well it is NOT hard working British citizens. Only an incredible 0.8% of those getting extra money from this will be both British and working. That means 99.2% are either NOT British or NOT working. So we are paying for foreign citizens to have more children or people on welfare to have more Children. It’s a policy that perpetuates the doom loop we are in. It should be 100% the other way around. INCENTIVISE hard working , striving BRITISH parents to have more kids and 100% remove ALL benefits for foreign citizens and keep the cap at 2 for those on welfare. It’s bloody obvious….🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️😡 Proud Geordie Rupert Lowe MP Ben Habib Advance UK Restore Britain Nigel Farage MP GB News Talk

JohnHann0404🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

54,645 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

This is Britain now. A foreign man holds a British child in place while a gang of youths beat him senseless. The video is sickening. A little British boy being restrained and attacked by a group that has no business being here in the first place. This isn’t “enrichment.” This is the direct, predictable result of decades of mass immigration from incompatible cultures, weak borders, and a political class that has refused to protect British children. While our own kids are being targeted on the streets, the authorities often seem more interested in protecting the feelings of certain communities than in keeping our streets safe. We’ve seen this pattern before — grooming gangs that raped and trafficked thousands of British girls for years while police and councils looked the other way. Now we have street violence where foreign men hold British children down so their mates can attack them. And what’s the response? Too often, hesitation, excuses, or two-tier policing that treats native victims as secondary. The British people did not vote for this. We did not consent to turning our towns and cities into places where our children are no longer safe walking down the street. The same government that imports these problems then expects us to accept the violence as the new normal. This has to stop. Foreign nationals involved in attacks on British children should face immediate deportation after any sentence. No human rights loopholes. No endless appeals. The safety of our kids comes first. We need proper border control, mass remigration of those who refuse to integrate or who commit crimes, and a justice system that actually protects British people instead of bending over backwards for those who attack us. That child should never have been in that situation. His attackers should never have been in this country. Every incident like this is another indictment of the failed policies that have transformed parts of Britain beyond recognition. British children deserve to grow up safe in their own country. Not held down and beaten while foreign men facilitate the attack. Not living in fear because politicians prioritised open borders and political correctness over their protection. Enough is enough. Protect our kids. Deport the predators. Restore Britain.

This is Britain now. A foreign man holds a British child in place while a gang of youths beat him senseless. The video is sickening. A little British boy being restrained and attacked by a group that has no business being here in the first place. This isn’t “enrichment.” This is the direct, predictable result of decades of mass immigration from incompatible cultures, weak borders, and a political class that has refused to protect British children. While our own kids are being targeted on the streets, the authorities often seem more interested in protecting the feelings of certain communities than in keeping our streets safe. We’ve seen this pattern before — grooming gangs that raped and trafficked thousands of British girls for years while police and councils looked the other way. Now we have street violence where foreign men hold British children down so their mates can attack them. And what’s the response? Too often, hesitation, excuses, or two-tier policing that treats native victims as secondary. The British people did not vote for this. We did not consent to turning our towns and cities into places where our children are no longer safe walking down the street. The same government that imports these problems then expects us to accept the violence as the new normal. This has to stop. Foreign nationals involved in attacks on British children should face immediate deportation after any sentence. No human rights loopholes. No endless appeals. The safety of our kids comes first. We need proper border control, mass remigration of those who refuse to integrate or who commit crimes, and a justice system that actually protects British people instead of bending over backwards for those who attack us. That child should never have been in that situation. His attackers should never have been in this country. Every incident like this is another indictment of the failed policies that have transformed parts of Britain beyond recognition. British children deserve to grow up safe in their own country. Not held down and beaten while foreign men facilitate the attack. Not living in fear because politicians prioritised open borders and political correctness over their protection. Enough is enough. Protect our kids. Deport the predators. Restore Britain.

Right over Left Everytime

103,150 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

"...Ed Miliband as Foreign Secretary. You can see the photo on your screens. That photo, by the way, I'll blow it up for you, is genuine. We can assure you we would not be publishing this photo of Ed Miliband attempting to eat a sandwich if it were not genuine. Everyone in the United Kingdom knows that is indeed a real photo. The point here is that man, as you can see pictured on your screens now, is our new Foreign Secretary. Why the photo in particular is relevant is because of the...there's another one for you, it's because of the implication. As Lee Anderson MP states, which you can see now in the middle of your screens: 'Ed Miliband is now in charge of (our secret intelligence service, colloquially known as) MI6. Let that sink in.' This man is in charge of Britain's intelligence, Foreign Intelligence Service. And that is a problem. It is a problem because the photo itself, though of course comedic and tongue-in-cheek, what it depicts is an image of a man that lacks control of his faculties, in a more nuanced sense. And that is as exemplified by the concerns that the Americans have raised, which is on your screens now. It's not just us picking on him from over a photo, all right? Though, the photo is relevant. It's - to the actual point - where diplomacy comes in. The Americans have have made a serious point. The Times reports 21st July 2026, 'Ed Miliband has been appointed as Foreign Secretary. The US administration has already let it be known that it has significant reservations about Miliband.' Now, what those reservations may well be, probably include the fact that Ed Miliband was known as Red Ed, born to a devout Marxist father...Ed Miliband is similarly of that view. He was known as Red Ed when in government. The Americans are probably concerned that we've just appointed Red Ed as the head of our Foreign Intelligence Service." Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED

"...Ed Miliband as Foreign Secretary. You can see the photo on your screens. That photo, by the way, I'll blow it up for you, is genuine. We can assure you we would not be publishing this photo of Ed Miliband attempting to eat a sandwich if it were not genuine. Everyone in the United Kingdom knows that is indeed a real photo. The point here is that man, as you can see pictured on your screens now, is our new Foreign Secretary. Why the photo in particular is relevant is because of the...there's another one for you, it's because of the implication. As Lee Anderson MP states, which you can see now in the middle of your screens: 'Ed Miliband is now in charge of (our secret intelligence service, colloquially known as) MI6. Let that sink in.' This man is in charge of Britain's intelligence, Foreign Intelligence Service. And that is a problem. It is a problem because the photo itself, though of course comedic and tongue-in-cheek, what it depicts is an image of a man that lacks control of his faculties, in a more nuanced sense. And that is as exemplified by the concerns that the Americans have raised, which is on your screens now. It's not just us picking on him from over a photo, all right? Though, the photo is relevant. It's - to the actual point - where diplomacy comes in. The Americans have have made a serious point. The Times reports 21st July 2026, 'Ed Miliband has been appointed as Foreign Secretary. The US administration has already let it be known that it has significant reservations about Miliband.' Now, what those reservations may well be, probably include the fact that Ed Miliband was known as Red Ed, born to a devout Marxist father...Ed Miliband is similarly of that view. He was known as Red Ed when in government. The Americans are probably concerned that we've just appointed Red Ed as the head of our Foreign Intelligence Service." Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED

أبو عمّار

27,075 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

An excellent policy from Reform's Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧 Restricting social housing to British born is vital to solving UK housing crisis Foreign born pop: 2001: 8.3% 2021: 16.6% 2021-24: Boriswave Social housing is a NATIONAL asset built by BRITISH taxpayers for BRITISH people Yet successive governments have treated it as an international right. It is not. Social housing is a finite public resource. And quite simply too many people have arrived here in too short a time to allow the foreign born to occupy social housing. In 2021, 42% of the foreign born population of the UK had arrived in the previous decade alone (10 million people). 40% of Londoners are foreign born. British-born people whose families have paid in to this country must take priority over those who have come here recently. 1.3 million households are on the social housing waiting list. Of these approx. 195,000 are foreign. Reform estimates there are 540,000 foreign national households currently in social housing. If we house British nationals in those properties and remove foreign nationals from the waiting list, the waiting list will fall from 1.3 million to approx. 560,000. We would be mad not to adopt such a policy. Me on GB News:

An excellent policy from Reform's Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧 Restricting social housing to British born is vital to solving UK housing crisis Foreign born pop: 2001: 8.3% 2021: 16.6% 2021-24: Boriswave Social housing is a NATIONAL asset built by BRITISH taxpayers for BRITISH people Yet successive governments have treated it as an international right. It is not. Social housing is a finite public resource. And quite simply too many people have arrived here in too short a time to allow the foreign born to occupy social housing. In 2021, 42% of the foreign born population of the UK had arrived in the previous decade alone (10 million people). 40% of Londoners are foreign born. British-born people whose families have paid in to this country must take priority over those who have come here recently. 1.3 million households are on the social housing waiting list. Of these approx. 195,000 are foreign. Reform estimates there are 540,000 foreign national households currently in social housing. If we house British nationals in those properties and remove foreign nationals from the waiting list, the waiting list will fall from 1.3 million to approx. 560,000. We would be mad not to adopt such a policy. Me on GB News:

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

16,034 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🔥This Was One Of The Most Powerful And Refreshing Speeches Delivered In Parliament In Years 👏 Rupert Lowe MP hit the establishment like sunlight to vampires and the other MPs could barely stand it! 😂 He did what our weak and spineless leaders have dodged for far too long: speak the plain truth on the ECHR blocking the deportation of foreign criminals. He went through the absurd excuses one by one: “A convicted Sri Lankan sex offender was allowed to stay in Britain because he is gay and would be at risk of persecution if he was returned to his home country. I do not care.” “A Jamaican drug dealer was jailed twice but allowed to stay in Britain after claiming that his removal would breach his right to family life. I do not care.” “A Zimbabwean was jailed for killing a man in a car crash but allowed to stay in Britain after it was discovered that he had an illicit love child. I do not care.” “A convicted Indian paedophile was allowed to stay in Britain by claiming that the move would harm his children. I do not care.” “An Albanian criminal was allowed to stay in Britain partly because his son will not eat foreign chicken nuggets. I definitely do not care.” Then came the knockout: “We hear so much about the human rights of foreign p*dophiles, sex pests and murderers, what about the human rights of the British people not to be r*ped, stabbed or killed by foreigners who should never have been in our country to begin with?” “Please spare me the continued moral outrage. I am bored of it. The British people are bored of it.” “It is not cruel to deport criminals, and it is not inhumane to defend our own citizens. What is cruel and inhumane is allowing foreign killers and sex offenders to walk among us in the name of the human rights they should have forfeited the moment they committed their crimes.” This is real leadership. Fearless, honest, and putting British victims and British safety first. No other politician dares to stand up and say it this directly. No one. That’s why Restore Britain and Rupert Lowe are the only real choice if you actually want serious change on these issues. Look at Makerfield right now. Restore has announced their candidate and Lowe has set out the plan. Why settle for the same tired establishment figures like Burnham when you can back genuine, bold change with Restore? Burnham is just another career politician, despite the spin trying to paint him as fresh.

🔥This Was One Of The Most Powerful And Refreshing Speeches Delivered In Parliament In Years 👏 Rupert Lowe MP hit the establishment like sunlight to vampires and the other MPs could barely stand it! 😂 He did what our weak and spineless leaders have dodged for far too long: speak the plain truth on the ECHR blocking the deportation of foreign criminals. He went through the absurd excuses one by one: “A convicted Sri Lankan sex offender was allowed to stay in Britain because he is gay and would be at risk of persecution if he was returned to his home country. I do not care.” “A Jamaican drug dealer was jailed twice but allowed to stay in Britain after claiming that his removal would breach his right to family life. I do not care.” “A Zimbabwean was jailed for killing a man in a car crash but allowed to stay in Britain after it was discovered that he had an illicit love child. I do not care.” “A convicted Indian paedophile was allowed to stay in Britain by claiming that the move would harm his children. I do not care.” “An Albanian criminal was allowed to stay in Britain partly because his son will not eat foreign chicken nuggets. I definitely do not care.” Then came the knockout: “We hear so much about the human rights of foreign pdophiles, sex pests and murderers, what about the human rights of the British people not to be rped, stabbed or killed by foreigners who should never have been in our country to begin with?” “Please spare me the continued moral outrage. I am bored of it. The British people are bored of it.” “It is not cruel to deport criminals, and it is not inhumane to defend our own citizens. What is cruel and inhumane is allowing foreign killers and sex offenders to walk among us in the name of the human rights they should have forfeited the moment they committed their crimes.” This is real leadership. Fearless, honest, and putting British victims and British safety first. No other politician dares to stand up and say it this directly. No one. That’s why Restore Britain and Rupert Lowe are the only real choice if you actually want serious change on these issues. Look at Makerfield right now. Restore has announced their candidate and Lowe has set out the plan. Why settle for the same tired establishment figures like Burnham when you can back genuine, bold change with Restore? Burnham is just another career politician, despite the spin trying to paint him as fresh.

J Stewart

11,873 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

😡 HEATED CLASH: Jenrick Goes Head-to-Head with Cathy Newman Over Putting BRITS FIRST! 🔥 In a fiery exchange on The Cathy Newman Show, Reform UK’s Robert Jenrick stood firm on his party’s plan to prioritise British workers with tax cuts funded by a levy on foreign hires. Newman: “You’re discriminating against people based on where they come from and these people were made a promise.” Jenrick fired back: “It’s not discrimination to mind. If you’re the Chancellor of the UK, you should prioritise Brits when it comes to tax and spend rather than people who are not citizens. We’re not a hotel, Cathy!” He doubled down: “The government should serve the people of that country, not people who just happen to come here. They’re not a prisoner in this country. If they want to go and live and work elsewhere then they can do.” Newman: “They’ve made their home here.” Jenrick: “They’re not British citizens, Cathy.” Newman: “They are. They’ve got settled status.” Jenrick: “They’re not British citizens.” Why do so many in the establishment melt down at the mere idea of favouring British citizens for a change? They’re allergic to it. Suggest putting Brits first and watch the hysteria explode.

😡 HEATED CLASH: Jenrick Goes Head-to-Head with Cathy Newman Over Putting BRITS FIRST! 🔥 In a fiery exchange on The Cathy Newman Show, Reform UK’s Robert Jenrick stood firm on his party’s plan to prioritise British workers with tax cuts funded by a levy on foreign hires. Newman: “You’re discriminating against people based on where they come from and these people were made a promise.” Jenrick fired back: “It’s not discrimination to mind. If you’re the Chancellor of the UK, you should prioritise Brits when it comes to tax and spend rather than people who are not citizens. We’re not a hotel, Cathy!” He doubled down: “The government should serve the people of that country, not people who just happen to come here. They’re not a prisoner in this country. If they want to go and live and work elsewhere then they can do.” Newman: “They’ve made their home here.” Jenrick: “They’re not British citizens, Cathy.” Newman: “They are. They’ve got settled status.” Jenrick: “They’re not British citizens.” Why do so many in the establishment melt down at the mere idea of favouring British citizens for a change? They’re allergic to it. Suggest putting Brits first and watch the hysteria explode.

J Stewart

88,422 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 BRITISH TROOPS MASS RESIGNING – REFUSING TO DIE FOR STARMER & UKRAINE WAR 🚨 Reports are emerging that British soldiers are signing off en masse – stepping down rather than being sent to fight in NATO’s proxy war in Ukraine. They won’t die for Starmer’s regime or a war that funnels billions to elites while ordinary people pay the price. They see through the lies: This isn’t our fight. No British soldier should freeze at -20°C to line the pockets of warmongers. These troops are choosing prison over pointless slaughter – and the public should back them. If conscription comes, REFUSE. Let the corrupt elite send their own kids first. 🇬🇧 PUTTING BRITAIN FIRST, NOT GLOBALIST WARS Our military is for defence, not dying for EU/NATO expansion. Good on these lads for putting their lives over political madness. STAND WITH THEM. SHARE IF YOU AGREE. #UKMilitary #NoWarForNATO #StandWithOurTroops

🚨 BRITISH TROOPS MASS RESIGNING – REFUSING TO DIE FOR STARMER & UKRAINE WAR 🚨 Reports are emerging that British soldiers are signing off en masse – stepping down rather than being sent to fight in NATO’s proxy war in Ukraine. They won’t die for Starmer’s regime or a war that funnels billions to elites while ordinary people pay the price. They see through the lies: This isn’t our fight. No British soldier should freeze at -20°C to line the pockets of warmongers. These troops are choosing prison over pointless slaughter – and the public should back them. If conscription comes, REFUSE. Let the corrupt elite send their own kids first. 🇬🇧 PUTTING BRITAIN FIRST, NOT GLOBALIST WARS Our military is for defence, not dying for EU/NATO expansion. Good on these lads for putting their lives over political madness. STAND WITH THEM. SHARE IF YOU AGREE. #UKMilitary #NoWarForNATO #StandWithOurTroops

NoConscriptionLeague

124,372 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Three years. No National Insurance. For Indian nationals working in the UK. Yes — you heard that right. The government’s latest initiative gives foreign workers a three-year free ride while British workers are taxed to the max. Please… make it make sense to me. Does this mean they won’t be using the NHS? Won’t need our infrastructure? Won’t access the very services National Insurance is supposed to fund? Because I think we all know the answer to that — of course they will. So while YOU pay in, they get a tax break. How is that fair to the millions of British workers who are struggling every single day? This isn’t fairness. This isn’t putting our country first. This is the government once again turning its back on its own people. Reform UK says: enough is enough. It’s time for common sense. It’s time to put British people first. Watch. Share. Speak up.

Three years. No National Insurance. For Indian nationals working in the UK. Yes — you heard that right. The government’s latest initiative gives foreign workers a three-year free ride while British workers are taxed to the max. Please… make it make sense to me. Does this mean they won’t be using the NHS? Won’t need our infrastructure? Won’t access the very services National Insurance is supposed to fund? Because I think we all know the answer to that — of course they will. So while YOU pay in, they get a tax break. How is that fair to the millions of British workers who are struggling every single day? This isn’t fairness. This isn’t putting our country first. This is the government once again turning its back on its own people. Reform UK says: enough is enough. It’s time for common sense. It’s time to put British people first. Watch. Share. Speak up.

Cllr Sophie Preston-Hall ECC Rochford North

42,179 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Obviously, there is a racial aspect to Britishness. This criticism of the document is entirely valid. An Australian born in Australia is British, despite not being English, Scottish, Northern Irish or Welsh. An indian man born in Australian isn’t. However, the concept of ‘The British Race’ has been verboten for decades. We are not going from “this Somalian in social housing is just as british as you” to full on Cecil Rhodes “I contend we are the first race in the world” overnight. I think the Identity document captures current right wing public sentiment pretty well. If you spoke to most ‘right wing normies’, they would understand that this is our home, that English people should never become a minority in England etc, but they also would feel uncomfortable stripping the citizenship of and deporting foreign families who have been here for 2-3 generations. If we continue on current demographic trends I believe the Overton window will get to this point, and this document does lay the foundations for this. I have said previously that I believe Restore Britain is the vehicle that the British public will take on the journey to mine and the majority of my followers position. That hasn’t changed. Once you recognise our right to this land this can only go in one direction. If you think Restores position on our identity is going to get softer with “Charlie Downes sitting in the wings waiting to take over the party” and the rate at which public sentiment is turning against liberalism and immigration, then you are on crack. Overall I think the document is good. It clarified Restores position well, even if I don’t agree with it entirely. The citizenship only through marriage policy is a fantastic development. The parts I do agree with are great and it is essential we rally around them, even if you want total Remigration and a holy race war of revenge against Pakistan: This is our country and Restore Britain will never let White British people become a minority.

Obviously, there is a racial aspect to Britishness. This criticism of the document is entirely valid. An Australian born in Australia is British, despite not being English, Scottish, Northern Irish or Welsh. An indian man born in Australian isn’t. However, the concept of ‘The British Race’ has been verboten for decades. We are not going from “this Somalian in social housing is just as british as you” to full on Cecil Rhodes “I contend we are the first race in the world” overnight. I think the Identity document captures current right wing public sentiment pretty well. If you spoke to most ‘right wing normies’, they would understand that this is our home, that English people should never become a minority in England etc, but they also would feel uncomfortable stripping the citizenship of and deporting foreign families who have been here for 2-3 generations. If we continue on current demographic trends I believe the Overton window will get to this point, and this document does lay the foundations for this. I have said previously that I believe Restore Britain is the vehicle that the British public will take on the journey to mine and the majority of my followers position. That hasn’t changed. Once you recognise our right to this land this can only go in one direction. If you think Restores position on our identity is going to get softer with “Charlie Downes sitting in the wings waiting to take over the party” and the rate at which public sentiment is turning against liberalism and immigration, then you are on crack. Overall I think the document is good. It clarified Restores position well, even if I don’t agree with it entirely. The citizenship only through marriage policy is a fantastic development. The parts I do agree with are great and it is essential we rally around them, even if you want total Remigration and a holy race war of revenge against Pakistan: This is our country and Restore Britain will never let White British people become a minority.

Orm

14,131 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

Watch the full video here: Is your tax money funding therapy for Israeli soldiers? British taxpayers funded ‘therapeutic healing’ for Israeli soldiers who fought in Gaza, Declassified can reveal. This is despite the Charity Commission previously warning: ‘It is not lawful, or acceptable, for a charity to raise funds to support a soldier of a foreign military.’ An Israeli organisation received the undisclosed sum via a UK charity, with 25% Gift Aid added on by the British government. Emails obtained by Declassified show how the Yahalom Foundation – an Israeli veterans group – tells British supporters to channel their donations via its ‘registered partner platform in the UK’. ‘Processing your donation through them ensures you receive full tax recognition and enabled Gift Aid, maximising the impact of your contribution,’ it says. '100% of your gift is routed directly to Yahalom to support our core mission.' Additional records from two years ago show that British donations were made to fund equipment for serving Israeli soldiers – although it is not clear whether Gift Aid was added to these. A fundraising page said: ‘With your help we can buy more specialized equipment and supply it to our soldiers.’

Watch the full video here: Is your tax money funding therapy for Israeli soldiers? British taxpayers funded ‘therapeutic healing’ for Israeli soldiers who fought in Gaza, Declassified can reveal. This is despite the Charity Commission previously warning: ‘It is not lawful, or acceptable, for a charity to raise funds to support a soldier of a foreign military.’ An Israeli organisation received the undisclosed sum via a UK charity, with 25% Gift Aid added on by the British government. Emails obtained by Declassified show how the Yahalom Foundation – an Israeli veterans group – tells British supporters to channel their donations via its ‘registered partner platform in the UK’. ‘Processing your donation through them ensures you receive full tax recognition and enabled Gift Aid, maximising the impact of your contribution,’ it says. '100% of your gift is routed directly to Yahalom to support our core mission.' Additional records from two years ago show that British donations were made to fund equipment for serving Israeli soldiers – although it is not clear whether Gift Aid was added to these. A fundraising page said: ‘With your help we can buy more specialized equipment and supply it to our soldiers.’

Declassified UK

75,005 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

"If all this can happen to me. Imagine what can happen to others." I interviewed George Galloway and his wonderful wife Gayatri in Moscow this week. About their exile in Russia. And its so crazy. British police even interrogated Gayatri about the Palestine flag painted on her fingernail! "Essentially the government will be able to designate any individual or organization as acting against the British state." And he's scared of getting that 4am knock on the door. So one of Britains most famous political figures went into exile. And what has he done? Promoted peace with Russia. Well, that's in British interests. Promoted peace with Iran. Well, that's in British interests. Its not in British interests what Isreal is doing in Gaza either. And so how has he damaged British interests? The British security state is out of control. Britain in not sovreign. Those in charge are acting in foreign interests. And everyone knows it. That is the problem. George Galloway gayatri 🍀

"If all this can happen to me. Imagine what can happen to others." I interviewed George Galloway and his wonderful wife Gayatri in Moscow this week. About their exile in Russia. And its so crazy. British police even interrogated Gayatri about the Palestine flag painted on her fingernail! "Essentially the government will be able to designate any individual or organization as acting against the British state." And he's scared of getting that 4am knock on the door. So one of Britains most famous political figures went into exile. And what has he done? Promoted peace with Russia. Well, that's in British interests. Promoted peace with Iran. Well, that's in British interests. Its not in British interests what Isreal is doing in Gaza either. And so how has he damaged British interests? The British security state is out of control. Britain in not sovreign. Those in charge are acting in foreign interests. And everyone knows it. That is the problem. George Galloway gayatri 🍀

Johnny miller

145,569 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Britain faces an existential crisis Every day we see our culture & history undermined and our population demoralised The British people are told they've nothing to be proud of & that Britain is the root of all evil We must fight back "AMERICA: LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT!" was a popular saying when I was young. Britons need to adopt a similar attitude now. Dominated by nihilistic, self-loathing ideologues, our cultural and academic institutions are responsible for much of the anti-British propaganda we encounter. We must remember that WE, British taxpayers, fund these quangos, museums, galleries, universities etc. The government doesn't have any money. It spends OUR money. If publicly funded institutions create anti-British exhibitions, lecture us on the evils of our past, give us a guilt trip about slavery and the British Empire, denigrate our heroes, or simply demoralise our people, they should lose their funding. That's the most effective way to retaliate. From Arts Council England to Tate Britain and the National Theatre, potentially hundreds of these bodies are eroding national self confidence. It's a war of attrition and it cannot continue. My thoughts with Kevin O'Sullivan on Talk

Britain faces an existential crisis Every day we see our culture & history undermined and our population demoralised The British people are told they've nothing to be proud of & that Britain is the root of all evil We must fight back "AMERICA: LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT!" was a popular saying when I was young. Britons need to adopt a similar attitude now. Dominated by nihilistic, self-loathing ideologues, our cultural and academic institutions are responsible for much of the anti-British propaganda we encounter. We must remember that WE, British taxpayers, fund these quangos, museums, galleries, universities etc. The government doesn't have any money. It spends OUR money. If publicly funded institutions create anti-British exhibitions, lecture us on the evils of our past, give us a guilt trip about slavery and the British Empire, denigrate our heroes, or simply demoralise our people, they should lose their funding. That's the most effective way to retaliate. From Arts Council England to Tate Britain and the National Theatre, potentially hundreds of these bodies are eroding national self confidence. It's a war of attrition and it cannot continue. My thoughts with Kevin O'Sullivan on Talk

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

28,739 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

How does the UK rejoin the EU? Have a listen to David Miliband on BBC Radio 4 Today: Anna Foster, "The front page of the Guardian this morning is talking about the government trying to pitch an EU single market for goods, which Brussels seems to not be particularly keen on. What is your position on the government's stance at the moment on Europe and how our ongoing relationship with Europe should look?" David Miliband, "Well, I'm convinced that the security and prosperity of the UK depends on an institutionalized, deep and strong relationship with the rest of Europe. I'm absolutely convinced of that. The Russian invasion of Ukraine shows the way in which that's our number one security threat now." David Miliband, "But, we know our economy has been shrunk by 6 to 8% in the 10 years since Brexit. So there's an economic part of that. So when the government says we want a reset of our relations with Europe, I think that's a good thing. But then when I look that the reset so far is only worth £9 billion by 2040 and I remember that Britain is a 3 trillion pound economy, I'm left saying, no, we need a much higher dosage in our reset." Anna Foster, "How high? I mean, do you advocate for rejoining the EU?" David Miliband, "Well, I'm somewhat bemused by some of the commentary. I want this strong institutional relationship with the European Union. But then I know the deal we had until 2016 is not available now. We're not going to be able to get that deal again." David Miliband, "I also know the European Union is changing profoundly. The big issue for Brussels today is not Britain joining, it's Ukraine joining and Ukraine joining the European Union is going to mean a different institutional set of arrangements inside Europe." David Miliband, "So just to give you an example, they're talking about associate membership for Ukraine, they're talking about different tiers of membership. So the question of what kind of docking are we going to do in with the European Union? It's the re part of rejoin that I think we have to understand." David Miliband, "The world is changing out there." Anna Foster, "So you're not necessarily against the concept, but what you're saying is it would never be the way it was and therefore you don't think it's the right thing." David Miliband, "For that reason, it literally can't be the way that it was. We're not in a position to, I mean, the European Union wouldn't entertain us flipping and flopping. What we have to do is build a national consensus about our position with the European Union. I'm very happy with it as a long term goal." David Miliband, "Think for this Parliament we should be really driving our economic, political and other relations. There's a big debate about defence spending going on. As we know it's affected the aid budget. There's something called the European Defence Mechanism, which is the proposal for a European backed 800 billion euro defence package that would support all European countries inside the European Union and outside." David Miliband, "We should be championing that. That would be us putting in for a mutual security funding arrangement that would help fund our own defence and European defence. Because the truth is our defence is Europe's defence and vice versa."

How does the UK rejoin the EU? Have a listen to David Miliband on BBC Radio 4 Today: Anna Foster, "The front page of the Guardian this morning is talking about the government trying to pitch an EU single market for goods, which Brussels seems to not be particularly keen on. What is your position on the government's stance at the moment on Europe and how our ongoing relationship with Europe should look?" David Miliband, "Well, I'm convinced that the security and prosperity of the UK depends on an institutionalized, deep and strong relationship with the rest of Europe. I'm absolutely convinced of that. The Russian invasion of Ukraine shows the way in which that's our number one security threat now." David Miliband, "But, we know our economy has been shrunk by 6 to 8% in the 10 years since Brexit. So there's an economic part of that. So when the government says we want a reset of our relations with Europe, I think that's a good thing. But then when I look that the reset so far is only worth £9 billion by 2040 and I remember that Britain is a 3 trillion pound economy, I'm left saying, no, we need a much higher dosage in our reset." Anna Foster, "How high? I mean, do you advocate for rejoining the EU?" David Miliband, "Well, I'm somewhat bemused by some of the commentary. I want this strong institutional relationship with the European Union. But then I know the deal we had until 2016 is not available now. We're not going to be able to get that deal again." David Miliband, "I also know the European Union is changing profoundly. The big issue for Brussels today is not Britain joining, it's Ukraine joining and Ukraine joining the European Union is going to mean a different institutional set of arrangements inside Europe." David Miliband, "So just to give you an example, they're talking about associate membership for Ukraine, they're talking about different tiers of membership. So the question of what kind of docking are we going to do in with the European Union? It's the re part of rejoin that I think we have to understand." David Miliband, "The world is changing out there." Anna Foster, "So you're not necessarily against the concept, but what you're saying is it would never be the way it was and therefore you don't think it's the right thing." David Miliband, "For that reason, it literally can't be the way that it was. We're not in a position to, I mean, the European Union wouldn't entertain us flipping and flopping. What we have to do is build a national consensus about our position with the European Union. I'm very happy with it as a long term goal." David Miliband, "Think for this Parliament we should be really driving our economic, political and other relations. There's a big debate about defence spending going on. As we know it's affected the aid budget. There's something called the European Defence Mechanism, which is the proposal for a European backed 800 billion euro defence package that would support all European countries inside the European Union and outside." David Miliband, "We should be championing that. That would be us putting in for a mutual security funding arrangement that would help fund our own defence and European defence. Because the truth is our defence is Europe's defence and vice versa."

Farrukh

23,919 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten