正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

DAVID SACKS, CHAMATH, AND NAVAL MADE THE CASE FOR AI OPTIMISM: AI COULD CREATE MORE JOBS THAN IT DISPLACES. SACKS: “WE DON'T KNOW THAT JOBS ARE ACTUALLY GOING TO BE LOST. YOU'RE MAKING A HUGE ASSUMPTION THAT'S BUYING INTO DOOMERISM.” NAVAL: “TECHNOLOGY DOES DESTROY JOBS BUT IT REPLACES THEM... show more

Vivek Sen

277,166 subscribers

11,399 次观看 • 11 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Jeff Bezos told #VivaTech on Wednesday that fears of AI job loss are overblown, arguing the technology will create more jobs than people to fill them.

Jeff Bezos told #VivaTech on Wednesday that fears of AI job loss are overblown, arguing the technology will create more jobs than people to fill them.

FORTUNE

14,528 次观看 • 2 个月前

Andrew Yang says AI will create new jobs but will destroy millions “AI is going to create many new jobs that we cannot predict. Millions of Americans are going to lose their jobs to AI, both those statements are 100% true” “The issue in my mind is that many of the jobs that are gonna be created are gonna be for different people with different skills than the jobs that got eliminated, and the number of jobs eliminated will be many times higher” “The comparison I make for White Collar folks is when the internet came and did a number on local newspapers. Some people would say, oh, there’ll be new media jobs, which there were…” “But for every 10 local reporters that lost their jobs, maybe you had 3 that then worked at BuzzFeed and now BuzzFeed is disappearing too” “The numbers just don’t match up”

Andrew Yang says AI will create new jobs but will destroy millions “AI is going to create many new jobs that we cannot predict. Millions of Americans are going to lose their jobs to AI, both those statements are 100% true” “The issue in my mind is that many of the jobs that are gonna be created are gonna be for different people with different skills than the jobs that got eliminated, and the number of jobs eliminated will be many times higher” “The comparison I make for White Collar folks is when the internet came and did a number on local newspapers. Some people would say, oh, there’ll be new media jobs, which there were…” “But for every 10 local reporters that lost their jobs, maybe you had 3 that then worked at BuzzFeed and now BuzzFeed is disappearing too” “The numbers just don’t match up”

Jack

70,446 次观看 • 4 个月前

.Anthony Pompliano 🌪 is exactly right. while the scope of work of some jobs may suffer in the mid-term, entirely new categories of work are continuing to emerge. AI will ultimately create a lot more jobs than it displaces. and those displaced, in almost every case, will be evolutions of the same job.

.Anthony Pompliano 🌪 is exactly right. while the scope of work of some jobs may suffer in the mid-term, entirely new categories of work are continuing to emerge. AI will ultimately create a lot more jobs than it displaces. and those displaced, in almost every case, will be evolutions of the same job.

Ali Ansari

20,304 次观看 • 6 个月前

Naval on how to get a job in 2025: Learn how to use AI Naval on E215: "The fastest way to help somebody get a job right now: the best thing you can do is say, 'Hey, go download the AI tools and just start talking to them. Just start using them in any way.'" "And then you can walk into any employer in almost any field and say, 'Hey, I understand AI.' And they'll hire you on the spot." "AI is a productivity tool. It increases the productivity of a worker. It allows them to do more creative work and less repetitive work. As such, it makes them more valuable." "Yes, there is some retraining involved, but not a lot. These are natural language computers. You can talk to them in plain English, and they talk back to you in plain English." "I think we will see job creation by AI that will be as fast or faster than job destruction." "You saw this even with the internet. Like, YouTube came along. Look at all these YouTube streamers and influencers. That didn't used to be a job." "Go brush up on your AI. Learn a little bit. Watch a few videos. Use the AI." "Tinker with it and then go reapply for that job that rejected you, and watch how they pull you in."

Naval on how to get a job in 2025: Learn how to use AI Naval on E215: "The fastest way to help somebody get a job right now: the best thing you can do is say, 'Hey, go download the AI tools and just start talking to them. Just start using them in any way.'" "And then you can walk into any employer in almost any field and say, 'Hey, I understand AI.' And they'll hire you on the spot." "AI is a productivity tool. It increases the productivity of a worker. It allows them to do more creative work and less repetitive work. As such, it makes them more valuable." "Yes, there is some retraining involved, but not a lot. These are natural language computers. You can talk to them in plain English, and they talk back to you in plain English." "I think we will see job creation by AI that will be as fast or faster than job destruction." "You saw this even with the internet. Like, YouTube came along. Look at all these YouTube streamers and influencers. That didn't used to be a job." "Go brush up on your AI. Learn a little bit. Watch a few videos. Use the AI." "Tinker with it and then go reapply for that job that rejected you, and watch how they pull you in."

The All-In Podcast

164,045 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 DAVID SACKS: “I don't think there's going to be this huge job loss associated with this [AI] productivity boom that we're going to get. In fact, I think what's actually happening now is that AI is becoming synonymous with the American economy … It's generating 75% of GDP.”

🚨 DAVID SACKS: “I don't think there's going to be this huge job loss associated with this [AI] productivity boom that we're going to get. In fact, I think what's actually happening now is that AI is becoming synonymous with the American economy … It's generating 75% of GDP.”

Chief Nerd

79,986 次观看 • 3 个月前

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang on AI: The fact that this is going to be the end of humanity—it's complete nonsense. The fact that this is going to destroy half of the American jobs—it's complete nonsense. AI will increase productivity. When productivity is increased, it creates opportunities. Over the history of technology, society has become more productive as a result of technology. It has created more jobs, not less. Source: Axios

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang on AI: The fact that this is going to be the end of humanity—it's complete nonsense. The fact that this is going to destroy half of the American jobs—it's complete nonsense. AI will increase productivity. When productivity is increased, it creates opportunities. Over the history of technology, society has become more productive as a result of technology. It has created more jobs, not less. Source: Axios

Clash Report

16,704 次观看 • 1 个月前

DAVID SACKS: “Dario was the one who [said] 50% of entry-level knowledge workers are going to lose their job — not in the distant future, in as soon as one year … And there is no evidence of that. We're now years into the AI boom and we only see net job creation.”

DAVID SACKS: “Dario was the one who [said] 50% of entry-level knowledge workers are going to lose their job — not in the distant future, in as soon as one year … And there is no evidence of that. We're now years into the AI boom and we only see net job creation.”

Chief Nerd

30,833 次观看 • 3 天前

DAVID SACKS: “I understand that there is a lot of concern about [AI] job disruption or job loss. That's not what we're seeing in the data so far. What we're actually seeing is job creation … We have a 4% GDP growth number right now, and half of that is attributable to AI.”

DAVID SACKS: “I understand that there is a lot of concern about [AI] job disruption or job loss. That's not what we're seeing in the data so far. What we're actually seeing is job creation … We have a 4% GDP growth number right now, and half of that is attributable to AI.”

Chief Nerd

206,382 次观看 • 8 个月前

Most people are worried that AI will take their jobs. I get it, the pace of change is relentless. But AI means better public services, opportunities for our children, higher productivity and better jobs. My government is harnessing the power of AI to deliver for working people.

Most people are worried that AI will take their jobs. I get it, the pace of change is relentless. But AI means better public services, opportunities for our children, higher productivity and better jobs. My government is harnessing the power of AI to deliver for working people.

Keir Starmer

249,395 次观看 • 1 年前

We are harnessing the benefits of AI to create jobs, boost growth and drive prosperity in the places that need it most. The new AI Growth Zone in South Wales and increased investment into AI will help us to seize the opportunities of AI and build a better Britain.

We are harnessing the benefits of AI to create jobs, boost growth and drive prosperity in the places that need it most. The new AI Growth Zone in South Wales and increased investment into AI will help us to seize the opportunities of AI and build a better Britain.

Liz Kendall

79,325 次观看 • 9 个月前

Many professionals are about to be faced with an ethical quandary: are they more upset about AI making their jobs obsolete or more pleased with the fact that AI provides their critical role better than they can? Selfish or selfless?

Many professionals are about to be faced with an ethical quandary: are they more upset about AI making their jobs obsolete or more pleased with the fact that AI provides their critical role better than they can? Selfish or selfless?

Autism Capital 🧩

121,117 次观看 • 1 年前

NEW: Joe Lonsdale flips AI regulation debate on its head Maria Bartiromo: AI is moving faster than regulation. Does that concern you? Joe: What I'm concerned by is that AI is moving faster than the ability for the government to allow us to do this. AI is helping cure all these new diseases... But we have an FDA that's not letting us save lives... The FDA is not set up for the AI age. It's set up to let China take over the sector... There are more big [pharma] deals buying Chinese drugs [than U.S. drugs]; there are more clinical trials going on in China. We need a leader of the FDA that will push back on the bureaucracy, that will say, we are going to both be safe and we're going to go faster and save more lives.

NEW: Joe Lonsdale flips AI regulation debate on its head Maria Bartiromo: AI is moving faster than regulation. Does that concern you? Joe: What I'm concerned by is that AI is moving faster than the ability for the government to allow us to do this. AI is helping cure all these new diseases... But we have an FDA that's not letting us save lives... The FDA is not set up for the AI age. It's set up to let China take over the sector... There are more big [pharma] deals buying Chinese drugs [than U.S. drugs]; there are more clinical trials going on in China. We need a leader of the FDA that will push back on the bureaucracy, that will say, we are going to both be safe and we're going to go faster and save more lives.

American Optimist

57,521 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨🇺🇸 VP VANCE: ROBOTICS WILL RAISE WORKERS’ WAGES “I understand why people are worried that if you have a robot doing that job, does it take away from a blue collar worker. Right now, the evidence I see is if we lean into robotics and technology, it’s going to raise everybody’s wages. The ATM didn’t destroy bank teller jobs. Today there are more tellers, doing different jobs, with higher wages.” Source: Fox

🚨🇺🇸 VP VANCE: ROBOTICS WILL RAISE WORKERS’ WAGES “I understand why people are worried that if you have a robot doing that job, does it take away from a blue collar worker. Right now, the evidence I see is if we lean into robotics and technology, it’s going to raise everybody’s wages. The ATM didn’t destroy bank teller jobs. Today there are more tellers, doing different jobs, with higher wages.” Source: Fox

Mario Nawfal

201,473 次观看 • 9 个月前

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

Uncover AI

16,813 次观看 • 3 个月前

Tariffs don't create jobs. They redistribute who does which job. And so employing more Americans screwing tiny screws into iPhones, means employing fewer of them doing other jobs. Which are the jobs the President wants us to dodge so that we can pick up those small screwdrivers?

Tariffs don't create jobs. They redistribute who does which job. And so employing more Americans screwing tiny screws into iPhones, means employing fewer of them doing other jobs. Which are the jobs the President wants us to dodge so that we can pick up those small screwdrivers?

Justin Wolfers

298,524 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 ELON MUSK: "AI will outperform humans at most jobs." “I do think it’s going to be a bumpy road, because AI will be able to do any job better than any person can do that job. That will be true very quickly for jobs that are digital, or really anything that involves a person at a computer or on a phone. AI will be able to do all of that very soon. For software engineering, we already have a situation where AI is better than at least 90% of humans at writing software, including 90% of professional software engineers. It really is getting to the point where it will be better than 99%, and then it will get to the point where there’s just no way to compete. It will get to what I call Stockfish level. Stockfish is a chess program that is so good at chess that it will easily beat Magnus Carlsen, or anyone, even while running on a small computer. I suspect you could probably run Stockfish on your phone and beat Magnus Carlsen. That’s how good it is at chess, and that’s how good AI will be at writing software. And that applies to everything.”

🚨 ELON MUSK: "AI will outperform humans at most jobs." “I do think it’s going to be a bumpy road, because AI will be able to do any job better than any person can do that job. That will be true very quickly for jobs that are digital, or really anything that involves a person at a computer or on a phone. AI will be able to do all of that very soon. For software engineering, we already have a situation where AI is better than at least 90% of humans at writing software, including 90% of professional software engineers. It really is getting to the point where it will be better than 99%, and then it will get to the point where there’s just no way to compete. It will get to what I call Stockfish level. Stockfish is a chess program that is so good at chess that it will easily beat Magnus Carlsen, or anyone, even while running on a small computer. I suspect you could probably run Stockfish on your phone and beat Magnus Carlsen. That’s how good it is at chess, and that’s how good AI will be at writing software. And that applies to everything.”

DogeDesigner

61,112 次观看 • 1 个月前

David Friedberg: The AI Jobs Panic Is a Crock of Sh*t Why? The revenue potential outweighs the cost savings by 100x. “There is no job loss with AI. I've said it a thousand times, and I will say it again, and again, and again. What I see on the ground, and what I've seen at dozens of companies, including my company that I run, there are two sides to a business. There is revenue and there’s costs. On the cost side of the equation, AI can be used to reduce humans doing things that cost money, to some extent. The effect there, I would argue, is nominal. The real opportunity with AI is on the revenue side, where suddenly one engineer can do 100x or 1000x what they used to be able to do, meaning you can make more products at your company, whether those are agricultural seed products, or boats and ships, or software for companies, or clothing, or what have you. Because of AI, everyone has the ability to expand their revenue base to create more products, and that is the foundation of good economic prosperity. It is called productivity. We can grow productivity in this country with AI. So where I see AI being used is on the revenue side 100x more than the cost side. And in that equation, people are hiring like crazy. We cannot hire enough people. I just had a review meeting with my product and engineering team two days ago, and they're like, ‘We want to add an extra 15 headcount to our engineering squads because we have all this opportunity to do stuff that we couldn't otherwise do.’ So we are going to hire more people. And to Sacks' point, we are seeing that show up in the jobs numbers. The idea that AI is going to destroy jobs is a Luddite idea that is being disproven every single day, and I see it on the ground. It is only a matter of time before people wake up to this and they realize that this narrative that they've all been sold is a crock of sh*t.”

David Friedberg: The AI Jobs Panic Is a Crock of Sht Why? The revenue potential outweighs the cost savings by 100x. “There is no job loss with AI. I've said it a thousand times, and I will say it again, and again, and again. What I see on the ground, and what I've seen at dozens of companies, including my company that I run, there are two sides to a business. There is revenue and there’s costs. On the cost side of the equation, AI can be used to reduce humans doing things that cost money, to some extent. The effect there, I would argue, is nominal. The real opportunity with AI is on the revenue side, where suddenly one engineer can do 100x or 1000x what they used to be able to do, meaning you can make more products at your company, whether those are agricultural seed products, or boats and ships, or software for companies, or clothing, or what have you. Because of AI, everyone has the ability to expand their revenue base to create more products, and that is the foundation of good economic prosperity. It is called productivity. We can grow productivity in this country with AI. So where I see AI being used is on the revenue side 100x more than the cost side. And in that equation, people are hiring like crazy. We cannot hire enough people. I just had a review meeting with my product and engineering team two days ago, and they're like, ‘We want to add an extra 15 headcount to our engineering squads because we have all this opportunity to do stuff that we couldn't otherwise do.’ So we are going to hire more people. And to Sacks' point, we are seeing that show up in the jobs numbers. The idea that AI is going to destroy jobs is a Luddite idea that is being disproven every single day, and I see it on the ground. It is only a matter of time before people wake up to this and they realize that this narrative that they've all been sold is a crock of sht.”

The All-In Podcast

152,399 次观看 • 2 个月前