正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

David Sacks explains why AI doomerism is supplanting climate doomerism on the left: “I think the left needs a central organizing catastrophe to justify their takeover of the economy and to regulate everything, and especially to control the information space. And I think that you're seeing that the allure... of the whole climate change doomer narrative has kind of faded. Maybe it's the fact that they predicted 10 years ago that the whole world would be underwater in 10 years, and that hasn't happened.” “At a certain point you get discredited by your own catastrophic predictions. I suspect that's where we'll be with AI doomerism in a few years. But in the meantime, it's a really good narrative to kind of take the place of the climate doomerism.” David Sacks Erik Torenbergshow more

a16z

1,006,726 subscribers

140,984 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

David Sacks on Polytheistic AI, Better Crypto Regulation, Beating China, and Fixing SF David Sacks is the White House AI and Crypto Czar. He joined a16z’s Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowitz, and Erik Torenberg for a conversation covering the importance of beating China in the AI race, the need for a federal standard for crypto regulation, how AI doomerism is replacing climate doomerism, how to solve the energy bottleneck in AI development, the path to fixing San Francisco, and more. 00:00 The state of AI and crypto policy 16:20 Orwellian AI and the real risks of AI 32:26 AI capabilities and pullback from AGI hype 39:18 Open-source AI, decentralization, and software freedom 46:28 Winning the AI race through innovation and exports 53:38 The energy bottleneck and America’s infrastructure challenge 59:48 AI doomerism and political narratives 01:13:30 San Francisco’s future David Sacks Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 benahorowitz.eth Erik Torenberg

David Sacks on Polytheistic AI, Better Crypto Regulation, Beating China, and Fixing SF David Sacks is the White House AI and Crypto Czar. He joined a16z’s Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowitz, and Erik Torenberg for a conversation covering the importance of beating China in the AI race, the need for a federal standard for crypto regulation, how AI doomerism is replacing climate doomerism, how to solve the energy bottleneck in AI development, the path to fixing San Francisco, and more. 00:00 The state of AI and crypto policy 16:20 Orwellian AI and the real risks of AI 32:26 AI capabilities and pullback from AGI hype 39:18 Open-source AI, decentralization, and software freedom 46:28 Winning the AI race through innovation and exports 53:38 The energy bottleneck and America’s infrastructure challenge 59:48 AI doomerism and political narratives 01:13:30 San Francisco’s future David Sacks Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 benahorowitz.eth Erik Torenberg

a16z

2,229,172 次观看 • 8 个月前

David Sacks breaks down the true risk of AI David Sacks "It’s not that I think the AI is going to develop a mind of its own. I don’t think the technology is anywhere close to that. But I do think that it could be used by the government in a much more invasive and intrusive way, in the manner that the government was, the Deep State was already trying to get in bed with the social networks. There is a real risk that AI is used by future governments or the Deep State basically to surveil us, to censor us, and even potentially to brainwash us, because it is really good for that."

David Sacks breaks down the true risk of AI David Sacks "It’s not that I think the AI is going to develop a mind of its own. I don’t think the technology is anywhere close to that. But I do think that it could be used by the government in a much more invasive and intrusive way, in the manner that the government was, the Deep State was already trying to get in bed with the social networks. There is a real risk that AI is used by future governments or the Deep State basically to surveil us, to censor us, and even potentially to brainwash us, because it is really good for that."

jay plemons

102,370 次观看 • 7 个月前

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:

KanekoaTheGreat

542,958 次观看 • 2 年前

🇸🇦🇺🇸 DAVID SACKS: MCP IS THE NEXT BIG WAVE IN AI "MCP {Model Context Protocol} is a new standard that allows agents to talk to existing SaaS applications or any kind of application, and it's really going to enable this agentic future that I think is the next big wave in AI." Source: David Sacks

🇸🇦🇺🇸 DAVID SACKS: MCP IS THE NEXT BIG WAVE IN AI "MCP {Model Context Protocol} is a new standard that allows agents to talk to existing SaaS applications or any kind of application, and it's really going to enable this agentic future that I think is the next big wave in AI." Source: David Sacks

Mario Nawfal

123,166 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 DAVID SACKS: “I very much agree with the Pope that the biggest risk of AI is the centralization of power and then its misuse against us, in some Orwellian way. I think it's government that's going to do that.”

🚨 DAVID SACKS: “I very much agree with the Pope that the biggest risk of AI is the centralization of power and then its misuse against us, in some Orwellian way. I think it's government that's going to do that.”

Chief Nerd

337,143 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is the best take I have heard around the existing AI landscape today Fantastic explanation around the constraints at OpenAI and Anthropic, focus on enterprise business models, and the doomerism narrative in AI From former AI czar David Sacks "Even though Anthropic's revenue has followed this exponential graph very predictably, it cannot do that ever. The reason is that as you hit new levels of scale, you encounter new problems. You are simply going to run out of compute, electricity, data centers, and infrastructure. There are limits to the physical world you are going to hit. And there is already evidence that Anthropic is hitting some of those limits."

This is the best take I have heard around the existing AI landscape today Fantastic explanation around the constraints at OpenAI and Anthropic, focus on enterprise business models, and the doomerism narrative in AI From former AI czar David Sacks "Even though Anthropic's revenue has followed this exponential graph very predictably, it cannot do that ever. The reason is that as you hit new levels of scale, you encounter new problems. You are simply going to run out of compute, electricity, data centers, and infrastructure. There are limits to the physical world you are going to hit. And there is already evidence that Anthropic is hitting some of those limits."

Boring_Business

236,287 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇺🇸 DAVID SACKS: AI IS STILL IN A BOOM "We're seeing a lot of interesting AI applications being developed, but it's still very early days, and I think that over the past week or so, there was a correction in sentiment towards AI, but I think it was a healthy correction. I don't think this was the beginning of a bust cycle or something like that. I still think that we're in a boom.” Source: The All-In Podcast David Sacks

🇺🇸 DAVID SACKS: AI IS STILL IN A BOOM "We're seeing a lot of interesting AI applications being developed, but it's still very early days, and I think that over the past week or so, there was a correction in sentiment towards AI, but I think it was a healthy correction. I don't think this was the beginning of a bust cycle or something like that. I still think that we're in a boom.” Source: The All-In Podcast David Sacks

Mario Nawfal

51,576 次观看 • 10 个月前

WATCH: Secretary of Energy Chris Wright calls out the IEA to their face for having "massively gotten off track by a misunderstanding of climate change and the world energy system. I spent my entire life in the world energy system and over 20 years on climate change. But this belief that climate change is urgent, is causing catastrophic damage today, and we have to drop everything and focus everything on that, I can tell you nothing, nothing in the climate data supports that." Wright: "When the IEA was founded 50 years ago, a little over 80% of global energy came from hydrocarbons. 50 years later... No change even in the market share of where the world gets energy." Wright then calls out the Executive Director of the International Energy Agency Fatih Birol: "If Director Birol is gonna drive an organization to make the world a better place, to have accurate data on energy, at communication among the country's storage, coordinating policies, we need to stay focused on that."

WATCH: Secretary of Energy Chris Wright calls out the IEA to their face for having "massively gotten off track by a misunderstanding of climate change and the world energy system. I spent my entire life in the world energy system and over 20 years on climate change. But this belief that climate change is urgent, is causing catastrophic damage today, and we have to drop everything and focus everything on that, I can tell you nothing, nothing in the climate data supports that." Wright: "When the IEA was founded 50 years ago, a little over 80% of global energy came from hydrocarbons. 50 years later... No change even in the market share of where the world gets energy." Wright then calls out the Executive Director of the International Energy Agency Fatih Birol: "If Director Birol is gonna drive an organization to make the world a better place, to have accurate data on energy, at communication among the country's storage, coordinating policies, we need to stay focused on that."

Steve Guest

150,924 次观看 • 4 个月前

Here's Elon Musk two years ago discussing the China-Taiwan situation. David Faber: “Do you think China will make a move to take control of Taiwan?” Elon: “The official policy of China is that Taiwan should be integrated. One does not need to read between the lines. One can simply read the lines. I think there's some inevitability to the situation.” David Faber: “That would not be good for Tesla, conceivably, or for any company in the world, frankly.” Elon: “Yes, for any company in the world. I think almost no one realizes that the Chinese economy and the rest of the global economy are like conjoined twins. It would be like trying to separate conjoined twins. That's the severity of the situation. And it's actually worse for a lot of other companies than it is for Tesla. I mean, I'm not sure where you're going to get an iPhone, for example. Apple's recently started doing some small amount of production in India, but it's tiny.” David Faber: ”You seem to think it's likely to happen.” Elon: “I'm simply saying that that is their policy and I think you should take their word seriously. They mean it.” Interview with David Faber CNBC 2023, May 16, 2023

Here's Elon Musk two years ago discussing the China-Taiwan situation. David Faber: “Do you think China will make a move to take control of Taiwan?” Elon: “The official policy of China is that Taiwan should be integrated. One does not need to read between the lines. One can simply read the lines. I think there's some inevitability to the situation.” David Faber: “That would not be good for Tesla, conceivably, or for any company in the world, frankly.” Elon: “Yes, for any company in the world. I think almost no one realizes that the Chinese economy and the rest of the global economy are like conjoined twins. It would be like trying to separate conjoined twins. That's the severity of the situation. And it's actually worse for a lot of other companies than it is for Tesla. I mean, I'm not sure where you're going to get an iPhone, for example. Apple's recently started doing some small amount of production in India, but it's tiny.” David Faber: ”You seem to think it's likely to happen.” Elon: “I'm simply saying that that is their policy and I think you should take their word seriously. They mean it.” Interview with David Faber CNBC 2023, May 16, 2023

ELON CLIPS

35,283 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 DAVID SACKS: “This whole climate change thing was Al Gore's big hoax going back to the 90’s. Even Bill Gates has acknowledged that this is not an existential threat. So I think the bloom is off the rose in terms of that whole agenda.”

🚨 DAVID SACKS: “This whole climate change thing was Al Gore's big hoax going back to the 90’s. Even Bill Gates has acknowledged that this is not an existential threat. So I think the bloom is off the rose in terms of that whole agenda.”

Chief Nerd

126,770 次观看 • 5 个月前

Naval Ravikant: "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us." On E215, Naval broke down his main AI fear: consolidated control enabled by regulatory capture. "If you really think you're going to create God, do you want to put God on a leash with one entity controlling God?" "That to me is the real fear." "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us, 'for our own good.'" "I'm not an AI doomer. I don't think AI is going to end the world. That's a separate conversation." "But, there's this religion that comes along in many faces, which is that, 'Oh, climate change is going to end the world. AI is going to end the world. Asteroid's going to end the world. COVID-19 is going to end the world.' And it just has a way of fixating your attention, right? "It captures everybody's attention at once. So it's a very seductive thing." "And I think in the case of AI, it's really been overplayed by incentive bias. Motivated reasoning by the companies who are ahead and they want to pull up the ladder behind them." "I think they generally believe that there is safety risk, but I think they're motivated to believe in those safety risks and then they pass that along." "But it's kind of a weird position because they have to say, 'Oh, it's so dangerous that you shouldn't just let open-source go at it. And you should let just a few of us work with you on it. But it's not so dangerous that a private company can't own the whole thing.'" "Because if it was truly the Manhattan Project, if they were building nuclear weapons, you wouldn't want one company to own that." "So to me, the real issue boils down to, how do you push AI forward while not having just a very small number of players control the entire thing?"

Naval Ravikant: "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us." On E215, Naval broke down his main AI fear: consolidated control enabled by regulatory capture. "If you really think you're going to create God, do you want to put God on a leash with one entity controlling God?" "That to me is the real fear." "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us, 'for our own good.'" "I'm not an AI doomer. I don't think AI is going to end the world. That's a separate conversation." "But, there's this religion that comes along in many faces, which is that, 'Oh, climate change is going to end the world. AI is going to end the world. Asteroid's going to end the world. COVID-19 is going to end the world.' And it just has a way of fixating your attention, right? "It captures everybody's attention at once. So it's a very seductive thing." "And I think in the case of AI, it's really been overplayed by incentive bias. Motivated reasoning by the companies who are ahead and they want to pull up the ladder behind them." "I think they generally believe that there is safety risk, but I think they're motivated to believe in those safety risks and then they pass that along." "But it's kind of a weird position because they have to say, 'Oh, it's so dangerous that you shouldn't just let open-source go at it. And you should let just a few of us work with you on it. But it's not so dangerous that a private company can't own the whole thing.'" "Because if it was truly the Manhattan Project, if they were building nuclear weapons, you wouldn't want one company to own that." "So to me, the real issue boils down to, how do you push AI forward while not having just a very small number of players control the entire thing?"

The All-In Podcast

300,830 次观看 • 1 年前

Ex-climate alarmist Lucy Biggers: After years of fearmongering about impending climate apocalypse, "Bill Gates has finally admitted that climate doomerism is a mistake". "Climate realists... have been saying this exact thing for years." "But those scientists and writers were ostracised... censored on social media, protested, and in some cases pushed out of their jobs." "They were mocked as climate deniers for saying the same thing Bill Gates is finally admitting today." "Apologise to the scientists who were punished for speaking the truth." "Apologise to the young people who sacrificed their futures because of the fear you helped spread." "And apologise to the developing countries that were forced to stay poor, chasing green technologies that don't even work." Credit: Lucy Biggers The Free Press

Ex-climate alarmist Lucy Biggers: After years of fearmongering about impending climate apocalypse, "Bill Gates has finally admitted that climate doomerism is a mistake". "Climate realists... have been saying this exact thing for years." "But those scientists and writers were ostracised... censored on social media, protested, and in some cases pushed out of their jobs." "They were mocked as climate deniers for saying the same thing Bill Gates is finally admitting today." "Apologise to the scientists who were punished for speaking the truth." "Apologise to the young people who sacrificed their futures because of the fear you helped spread." "And apologise to the developing countries that were forced to stay poor, chasing green technologies that don't even work." Credit: Lucy Biggers The Free Press

Wide Awake Media

72,003 次观看 • 8 个月前

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

a16z

79,935 次观看 • 8 个月前

Ben Horowitz on the infrastructure behind the AI economy: "Crypto is the natural money for AI because it’s internet-native money." "AI is global. Crypto is global." "There needs to be not just a ledger of money, but probably a ledger of truth for AI to really fulfill its potential." "I think people are probably underestimating how crypto and AI work together to form the AI economy." "Networks and computers tend to grow together, and I think that AI is obviously a new kind of computer and crypto is a new kind of network." benahorowitz.eth on Moonshots with Peter H. Diamandis, MD

Ben Horowitz on the infrastructure behind the AI economy: "Crypto is the natural money for AI because it’s internet-native money." "AI is global. Crypto is global." "There needs to be not just a ledger of money, but probably a ledger of truth for AI to really fulfill its potential." "I think people are probably underestimating how crypto and AI work together to form the AI economy." "Networks and computers tend to grow together, and I think that AI is obviously a new kind of computer and crypto is a new kind of network." benahorowitz.eth on Moonshots with Peter H. Diamandis, MD

a16z

237,317 次观看 • 4 个月前

When asked whether the ending of #LovesAmbition is a HE or BE #ZhaoLusi: HE? Hahaha I think it's considered to be a Happy Ending. Because in the end, she no longer has the same desire that she used to have in the beginning, that was to be a Rich Man's wife. That kind of ending. I think she found the True Self that she wants. I just feel that since everyone is always occupied with working everyday, they seem to be following the pace of the world rather than their own pacing. At the end of this drama, it's all about how I managed to find the rhythm of my own heart. Becoming a person that I truly want to be and lead a life that I want to. So it's rather encouraging while watching this show. To those who think that it's already the lowest point in life, (Teasing) actually no, it might get even lower later hahaha but that is Life"

When asked whether the ending of #LovesAmbition is a HE or BE #ZhaoLusi: HE? Hahaha I think it's considered to be a Happy Ending. Because in the end, she no longer has the same desire that she used to have in the beginning, that was to be a Rich Man's wife. That kind of ending. I think she found the True Self that she wants. I just feel that since everyone is always occupied with working everyday, they seem to be following the pace of the world rather than their own pacing. At the end of this drama, it's all about how I managed to find the rhythm of my own heart. Becoming a person that I truly want to be and lead a life that I want to. So it's rather encouraging while watching this show. To those who think that it's already the lowest point in life, (Teasing) actually no, it might get even lower later hahaha but that is Life"

jov ☀️

56,849 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨NEW: David Sacks, Chamath, and Naval make the case for AI optimism and say that AI will *create* more jobs than it displaces SACKS: "We don't know that jobs are actually going to be lost. You're making a huge assumption thats buying into doomerism. Have any jobs been lost by AI? We've had AI for two years and so far it's just been a better search engine and it's helped kids cheat on their essays." NAVAL: "Technology does destroy jobs but it replaces them with opportunities that are better. AI is a productivity tool, it allows the worker to become more valuable. We will see job creation by AI that will be *faster* than job destruction. New opportunities will be created." SACKS: "Whenever you have a new technology you get productivity gains, you get some job change, and there is some job loss. The third category will follow the historical trend which is the first two categories are always bigger and you end up with more net productivity and wealth creation." David Sacks Chamath Palihapitiya Naval The All-In Podcast

🚨NEW: David Sacks, Chamath, and Naval make the case for AI optimism and say that AI will create more jobs than it displaces SACKS: "We don't know that jobs are actually going to be lost. You're making a huge assumption thats buying into doomerism. Have any jobs been lost by AI? We've had AI for two years and so far it's just been a better search engine and it's helped kids cheat on their essays." NAVAL: "Technology does destroy jobs but it replaces them with opportunities that are better. AI is a productivity tool, it allows the worker to become more valuable. We will see job creation by AI that will be faster than job destruction. New opportunities will be created." SACKS: "Whenever you have a new technology you get productivity gains, you get some job change, and there is some job loss. The third category will follow the historical trend which is the first two categories are always bigger and you end up with more net productivity and wealth creation." David Sacks Chamath Palihapitiya Naval The All-In Podcast

Autism Capital 🧩

316,935 次观看 • 1 年前

Drew Timme on Kendrick Perkins saying he should be a rotation player on an NBA team: "That's super cool... that hasn't quite been the narrative I'd say since I left college, that I can play in the league and deserve a spot or whatever. To kind of see that narrative change, it's good because you've seen what people say about you earlier." (via Erik Slater)

Drew Timme on Kendrick Perkins saying he should be a rotation player on an NBA team: "That's super cool... that hasn't quite been the narrative I'd say since I left college, that I can play in the league and deserve a spot or whatever. To kind of see that narrative change, it's good because you've seen what people say about you earlier." (via Erik Slater)

ClutchPoints

100,987 次观看 • 1 年前

CNN "journalists" are triggered by the fact Americans aren't falling for the climate narrative. "The climate change message... has not really worked with the American people." "It is not anywhere close to being the biggest thing that people are worried about." "Even on the left wing, where you'd expect the climate change message to hit most home, it's... not reaching that type of level in terms of the doomsday scenario that Bill Gates is talking about."

CNN "journalists" are triggered by the fact Americans aren't falling for the climate narrative. "The climate change message... has not really worked with the American people." "It is not anywhere close to being the biggest thing that people are worried about." "Even on the left wing, where you'd expect the climate change message to hit most home, it's... not reaching that type of level in terms of the doomsday scenario that Bill Gates is talking about."

Wide Awake Media

37,110 次观看 • 5 个月前

CNN Technical Director, Charlie Chester, in a secret Project Veritas recording from April 2021: Once the public are no longer scared of "Covid", "climate change" will take centre stage as the new imaginary boogeyman to terrify everyone into submission with. "They've already announced in our office that once the public is open to it, we're going to start focusing mainly on climate… There's a definitive ending to the pandemic. It'll taper off to a point that it's not a problem anymore. The climate thing is gonna take years, so they'll probably be able to milk that for quite a bit." "Be prepared, it's coming." And sure enough, two and a half whole years later, we're now seeing this play out in the mainstream media—in absolute lockstep, just like with the "Covid" narrative.

CNN Technical Director, Charlie Chester, in a secret Project Veritas recording from April 2021: Once the public are no longer scared of "Covid", "climate change" will take centre stage as the new imaginary boogeyman to terrify everyone into submission with. "They've already announced in our office that once the public is open to it, we're going to start focusing mainly on climate… There's a definitive ending to the pandemic. It'll taper off to a point that it's not a problem anymore. The climate thing is gonna take years, so they'll probably be able to milk that for quite a bit." "Be prepared, it's coming." And sure enough, two and a half whole years later, we're now seeing this play out in the mainstream media—in absolute lockstep, just like with the "Covid" narrative.

illuminatibot

1,332,788 次观看 • 2 年前

🔥🧠David Sacks Calls Out the AI Doomer Industrial Complex Sacks exposes web of AI Doomerism: Who are they? Three key nodes: -- Effective Altruists -- Former AI-focused Biden staffers -- Anthropic Patterns: -- AI threat inflation: bioweapons, job loss, etc. -- Carried out by a network of groups primarily funded by EA billionaires Goals: -- Global AI regulation -- " extreme restrictions on proliferation of computing power" -- Safety and security regulations -- Built-in "Woke AI" -- Picking 2-3 winners -- Similar to AI policy under Biden David Sacks: " These are people who fundamentally believe in empowering government to the maximum extent." "My problem with that is, I actually think that probably the single greatest dystopian risk associated with AI is the risk that government uses it to control all of us." "And out of all the risks we've talked about, that's the only one for which I've seen tangible evidence." " So in other words, if you go back to last year when we had the whole 'Woke AI', there was plenty of evidence that the people who were creating these products were infusing their left-wing or woke values into the product to the point where it was lying to all of us and it was rewriting history." " And there was plenty of evidence that the Biden EO was trying to enshrine that idea, basically trying to require DEI be infused into AI models." " So I'm quite convinced that prior to Donald Trump winning the election, we were on a path of global compute governance where two or three big AI companies were going to be anointed as the winners, and the quid pro quo is that they were going to infuse those AI models with woke values." "And there was plenty of evidence for that."

🔥🧠David Sacks Calls Out the AI Doomer Industrial Complex Sacks exposes web of AI Doomerism: Who are they? Three key nodes: -- Effective Altruists -- Former AI-focused Biden staffers -- Anthropic Patterns: -- AI threat inflation: bioweapons, job loss, etc. -- Carried out by a network of groups primarily funded by EA billionaires Goals: -- Global AI regulation -- " extreme restrictions on proliferation of computing power" -- Safety and security regulations -- Built-in "Woke AI" -- Picking 2-3 winners -- Similar to AI policy under Biden David Sacks: " These are people who fundamentally believe in empowering government to the maximum extent." "My problem with that is, I actually think that probably the single greatest dystopian risk associated with AI is the risk that government uses it to control all of us." "And out of all the risks we've talked about, that's the only one for which I've seen tangible evidence." " So in other words, if you go back to last year when we had the whole 'Woke AI', there was plenty of evidence that the people who were creating these products were infusing their left-wing or woke values into the product to the point where it was lying to all of us and it was rewriting history." " And there was plenty of evidence that the Biden EO was trying to enshrine that idea, basically trying to require DEI be infused into AI models." " So I'm quite convinced that prior to Donald Trump winning the election, we were on a path of global compute governance where two or three big AI companies were going to be anointed as the winners, and the quid pro quo is that they were going to infuse those AI models with woke values." "And there was plenty of evidence for that."

The All-In Podcast

148,698 次观看 • 1 年前