Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

David Sacks explains why AI doomerism is supplanting climate doomerism on the left: “I think the left needs a central organizing catastrophe to justify their takeover of the economy and to regulate everything, and especially to control the information space. And I think that you're seeing that the allure...

a16z's profile picture

a16z

1,006,726 subscribers

140,984 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

David Sacks on Polytheistic AI, Better Crypto Regulation, Beating China, and Fixing SF David Sacks is the White House AI and Crypto Czar. He joined a16z’s Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowitz, and Erik Torenberg for a conversation covering the importance of beating China in the AI race, the need for a federal standard for crypto regulation, how AI doomerism is replacing climate doomerism, how to solve the energy bottleneck in AI development, the path to fixing San Francisco, and more. 00:00 The state of AI and crypto policy 16:20 Orwellian AI and the real risks of AI 32:26 AI capabilities and pullback from AGI hype 39:18 Open-source AI, decentralization, and software freedom 46:28 Winning the AI race through innovation and exports 53:38 The energy bottleneck and America’s infrastructure challenge 59:48 AI doomerism and political narratives 01:13:30 San Francisco’s future David Sacks Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 benahorowitz.eth Erik Torenberg
1:17:29

David Sacks on Polytheistic AI, Better Crypto Regulation, Beating China, and Fixing SF David Sacks is the White House AI and Crypto Czar. He joined a16z’s Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowitz, and Erik Torenberg for a conversation covering the importance of beating China in the AI race, the need for a federal standard for crypto regulation, how AI doomerism is replacing climate doomerism, how to solve the energy bottleneck in AI development, the path to fixing San Francisco, and more. 00:00 The state of AI and crypto policy 16:20 Orwellian AI and the real risks of AI 32:26 AI capabilities and pullback from AGI hype 39:18 Open-source AI, decentralization, and software freedom 46:28 Winning the AI race through innovation and exports 53:38 The energy bottleneck and America’s infrastructure challenge 59:48 AI doomerism and political narratives 01:13:30 San Francisco’s future David Sacks Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 benahorowitz.eth Erik Torenberg

a16z

2,229,761 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

David Sacks breaks down the true risk of AI David Sacks "It’s not that I think the AI is going to develop a mind of its own. I don’t think the technology is anywhere close to that. But I do think that it could be used by the government in a much more invasive and intrusive way, in the manner that the government was, the Deep State was already trying to get in bed with the social networks. There is a real risk that AI is used by future governments or the Deep State basically to surveil us, to censor us, and even potentially to brainwash us, because it is really good for that."
2:50

David Sacks breaks down the true risk of AI David Sacks "It’s not that I think the AI is going to develop a mind of its own. I don’t think the technology is anywhere close to that. But I do think that it could be used by the government in a much more invasive and intrusive way, in the manner that the government was, the Deep State was already trying to get in bed with the social networks. There is a real risk that AI is used by future governments or the Deep State basically to surveil us, to censor us, and even potentially to brainwash us, because it is really good for that."

jay plemons

102,370 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Socialist Democrat nominee Melat Kiros says when you lump in the fight against "fascism" (i.e. MAGA) with "AI and climate change, I struggle with talking about it in a way that sounds like it's doomerism, but it's actually that serious. We are really in the end times right now."
0:55

Socialist Democrat nominee Melat Kiros says when you lump in the fight against "fascism" (i.e. MAGA) with "AI and climate change, I struggle with talking about it in a way that sounds like it's doomerism, but it's actually that serious. We are really in the end times right now."

Breitbart News

87,948 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:
3:45

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:

KanekoaTheGreat

543,051 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🇸🇦🇺🇸 DAVID SACKS: MCP IS THE NEXT BIG WAVE IN AI "MCP {Model Context Protocol} is a new standard that allows agents to talk to existing SaaS applications or any kind of application, and it's really going to enable this agentic future that I think is the next big wave in AI." Source: David Sacks
0:56

🇸🇦🇺🇸 DAVID SACKS: MCP IS THE NEXT BIG WAVE IN AI "MCP {Model Context Protocol} is a new standard that allows agents to talk to existing SaaS applications or any kind of application, and it's really going to enable this agentic future that I think is the next big wave in AI." Source: David Sacks

Mario Nawfal

123,191 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 DAVID SACKS: “I very much agree with the Pope that the biggest risk of AI is the centralization of power and then its misuse against us, in some Orwellian way. I think it's government that's going to do that.”
2:40

🚨 DAVID SACKS: “I very much agree with the Pope that the biggest risk of AI is the centralization of power and then its misuse against us, in some Orwellian way. I think it's government that's going to do that.”

Chief Nerd

337,531 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

This is the best take I have heard around the existing AI landscape today Fantastic explanation around the constraints at OpenAI and Anthropic, focus on enterprise business models, and the doomerism narrative in AI From former AI czar David Sacks "Even though Anthropic's revenue has followed this exponential graph very predictably, it cannot do that ever. The reason is that as you hit new levels of scale, you encounter new problems. You are simply going to run out of compute, electricity, data centers, and infrastructure. There are limits to the physical world you are going to hit. And there is already evidence that Anthropic is hitting some of those limits."
4:27

This is the best take I have heard around the existing AI landscape today Fantastic explanation around the constraints at OpenAI and Anthropic, focus on enterprise business models, and the doomerism narrative in AI From former AI czar David Sacks "Even though Anthropic's revenue has followed this exponential graph very predictably, it cannot do that ever. The reason is that as you hit new levels of scale, you encounter new problems. You are simply going to run out of compute, electricity, data centers, and infrastructure. There are limits to the physical world you are going to hit. And there is already evidence that Anthropic is hitting some of those limits."

Boring_Business

236,523 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Elon Musk explains the deeper reason why SpaceX succeeding in AI matters for humanity’s future "It's important that we have an AI that cares about humanity, that fosters humanity and helps take us to other planets and other star systems This is why I think it's essential that SpaceX succeed not just with AI hardware, but also with AI software. I think an AI that is SpaceX's baby will be a very good AI SpaceX is a collection some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and in morality and goodness. We want to have an AI that is born of that capability, that morality and that goodness. I think that's very, very important So I'd like to encourage people to help out with the AI hardware on the ground, the AI software, and of course with the AI satellites Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The Terafab will be a very important part of that”
1:28

Elon Musk explains the deeper reason why SpaceX succeeding in AI matters for humanity’s future "It's important that we have an AI that cares about humanity, that fosters humanity and helps take us to other planets and other star systems This is why I think it's essential that SpaceX succeed not just with AI hardware, but also with AI software. I think an AI that is SpaceX's baby will be a very good AI SpaceX is a collection some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and in morality and goodness. We want to have an AI that is born of that capability, that morality and that goodness. I think that's very, very important So I'd like to encourage people to help out with the AI hardware on the ground, the AI software, and of course with the AI satellites Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The Terafab will be a very important part of that”

X Freeze

29,787 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

WATCH: Secretary of Energy Chris Wright calls out the IEA to their face for having "massively gotten off track by a misunderstanding of climate change and the world energy system. I spent my entire life in the world energy system and over 20 years on climate change. But this belief that climate change is urgent, is causing catastrophic damage today, and we have to drop everything and focus everything on that, I can tell you nothing, nothing in the climate data supports that." Wright: "When the IEA was founded 50 years ago, a little over 80% of global energy came from hydrocarbons. 50 years later... No change even in the market share of where the world gets energy." Wright then calls out the Executive Director of the International Energy Agency Fatih Birol: "If Director Birol is gonna drive an organization to make the world a better place, to have accurate data on energy, at communication among the country's storage, coordinating policies, we need to stay focused on that."
1:37

WATCH: Secretary of Energy Chris Wright calls out the IEA to their face for having "massively gotten off track by a misunderstanding of climate change and the world energy system. I spent my entire life in the world energy system and over 20 years on climate change. But this belief that climate change is urgent, is causing catastrophic damage today, and we have to drop everything and focus everything on that, I can tell you nothing, nothing in the climate data supports that." Wright: "When the IEA was founded 50 years ago, a little over 80% of global energy came from hydrocarbons. 50 years later... No change even in the market share of where the world gets energy." Wright then calls out the Executive Director of the International Energy Agency Fatih Birol: "If Director Birol is gonna drive an organization to make the world a better place, to have accurate data on energy, at communication among the country's storage, coordinating policies, we need to stay focused on that."

Steve Guest

150,965 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 DAVID SACKS: “This whole climate change thing was Al Gore's big hoax going back to the 90’s. Even Bill Gates has acknowledged that this is not an existential threat. So I think the bloom is off the rose in terms of that whole agenda.”
1:24

🚨 DAVID SACKS: “This whole climate change thing was Al Gore's big hoax going back to the 90’s. Even Bill Gates has acknowledged that this is not an existential threat. So I think the bloom is off the rose in terms of that whole agenda.”

Chief Nerd

126,770 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

a16z's David George and Alex Immerman on why the AI buildout is the next chapter of "Software Is Eating the World": David: "You're seeing it in CapEx. It's heavily covered in the data center build-out. It's heavily covered in the amount of capital that's been going in to fund the model development." "To put it into very deep historical context, because this is probably the analogy that we've seen the most of, this build-out just surpassed railroads as a percentage of GDP." "We all happen to think that if you fast-forward five to seven, maybe 10 years from now, we'll be looking at these numbers, and they'll probably be 20x higher cumulatively." Alex: "This does feel like the next chapter of Marc's 'Software Is Eating the World.' Over the last 15 years, software has transformed all these industries, but only a small fraction of the population could build it. None of us could." "But today, look at us. We all have a handful of automations running every night. If you think about the software demand, that means a lot more compute, chips, power, construction." David George Alex Immerman
1:17

a16z's David George and Alex Immerman on why the AI buildout is the next chapter of "Software Is Eating the World": David: "You're seeing it in CapEx. It's heavily covered in the data center build-out. It's heavily covered in the amount of capital that's been going in to fund the model development." "To put it into very deep historical context, because this is probably the analogy that we've seen the most of, this build-out just surpassed railroads as a percentage of GDP." "We all happen to think that if you fast-forward five to seven, maybe 10 years from now, we'll be looking at these numbers, and they'll probably be 20x higher cumulatively." Alex: "This does feel like the next chapter of Marc's 'Software Is Eating the World.' Over the last 15 years, software has transformed all these industries, but only a small fraction of the population could build it. None of us could." "But today, look at us. We all have a handful of automations running every night. If you think about the software demand, that means a lot more compute, chips, power, construction." David George Alex Immerman

a16z

34,474 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

David Sacks: Anthropic Wants to Ban Open Source AI in America Listen to All-In to stay a few weeks (or months) ahead of everyone else David Sacks back in May: “I think where it's all leading to is an effort to ban open source models. There's a lot of breadcrumbs leading here. You look at a lot of the rhetoric around how models need to have guardrails, and that with open source models, the guardrails can be removed and therefore they're dangerous. You see this rhetoric already in Anthropic's blog posts. Any threat that they describe, they kind of go out of their way to take that shot at open source models. They're trying to create ideas or put predicate facts in the public record to justify an action later on. I think it's just a matter of time before they feel like they're at a position where maybe they can push for that type of ban directly.”
0:40

David Sacks: Anthropic Wants to Ban Open Source AI in America Listen to All-In to stay a few weeks (or months) ahead of everyone else David Sacks back in May: “I think where it's all leading to is an effort to ban open source models. There's a lot of breadcrumbs leading here. You look at a lot of the rhetoric around how models need to have guardrails, and that with open source models, the guardrails can be removed and therefore they're dangerous. You see this rhetoric already in Anthropic's blog posts. Any threat that they describe, they kind of go out of their way to take that shot at open source models. They're trying to create ideas or put predicate facts in the public record to justify an action later on. I think it's just a matter of time before they feel like they're at a position where maybe they can push for that type of ban directly.”

The All-In Podcast

87,353 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Naval Ravikant: "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us." On E215, Naval broke down his main AI fear: consolidated control enabled by regulatory capture. "If you really think you're going to create God, do you want to put God on a leash with one entity controlling God?" "That to me is the real fear." "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us, 'for our own good.'" "I'm not an AI doomer. I don't think AI is going to end the world. That's a separate conversation." "But, there's this religion that comes along in many faces, which is that, 'Oh, climate change is going to end the world. AI is going to end the world. Asteroid's going to end the world. COVID-19 is going to end the world.' And it just has a way of fixating your attention, right? "It captures everybody's attention at once. So it's a very seductive thing." "And I think in the case of AI, it's really been overplayed by incentive bias. Motivated reasoning by the companies who are ahead and they want to pull up the ladder behind them." "I think they generally believe that there is safety risk, but I think they're motivated to believe in those safety risks and then they pass that along." "But it's kind of a weird position because they have to say, 'Oh, it's so dangerous that you shouldn't just let open-source go at it. And you should let just a few of us work with you on it. But it's not so dangerous that a private company can't own the whole thing.'" "Because if it was truly the Manhattan Project, if they were building nuclear weapons, you wouldn't want one company to own that." "So to me, the real issue boils down to, how do you push AI forward while not having just a very small number of players control the entire thing?"
1:13

Naval Ravikant: "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us." On E215, Naval broke down his main AI fear: consolidated control enabled by regulatory capture. "If you really think you're going to create God, do you want to put God on a leash with one entity controlling God?" "That to me is the real fear." "I'm not scared of AI. I'm scared of what a very small number of people who control AI do to the rest of us, 'for our own good.'" "I'm not an AI doomer. I don't think AI is going to end the world. That's a separate conversation." "But, there's this religion that comes along in many faces, which is that, 'Oh, climate change is going to end the world. AI is going to end the world. Asteroid's going to end the world. COVID-19 is going to end the world.' And it just has a way of fixating your attention, right? "It captures everybody's attention at once. So it's a very seductive thing." "And I think in the case of AI, it's really been overplayed by incentive bias. Motivated reasoning by the companies who are ahead and they want to pull up the ladder behind them." "I think they generally believe that there is safety risk, but I think they're motivated to believe in those safety risks and then they pass that along." "But it's kind of a weird position because they have to say, 'Oh, it's so dangerous that you shouldn't just let open-source go at it. And you should let just a few of us work with you on it. But it's not so dangerous that a private company can't own the whole thing.'" "Because if it was truly the Manhattan Project, if they were building nuclear weapons, you wouldn't want one company to own that." "So to me, the real issue boils down to, how do you push AI forward while not having just a very small number of players control the entire thing?"

The All-In Podcast

301,207 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
1:34

Marc Andreessen says AI is hyper democratizing. “Is the future of the world going to be one or a small number of companies, or for that matter, governments or super AIs that kind of own and control everything?” “Or is this a technology that's going to diffuse out and be in everybody's hands?” “This is the time in which AI is actually hyper democratizing. It has spread to more individuals, both in the country and around the world in the shortest period of time of any new technology I think in history.” “The best AIs in the world are in the consumer products.” “This technology is going to be in everybody's hands. And everybody is going to be able to use it to optimize the things that they do, have it be a thought partner, assistant for building companies.” Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸

a16z

79,935 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Ben Horowitz on the infrastructure behind the AI economy: "Crypto is the natural money for AI because it’s internet-native money." "AI is global. Crypto is global." "There needs to be not just a ledger of money, but probably a ledger of truth for AI to really fulfill its potential." "I think people are probably underestimating how crypto and AI work together to form the AI economy." "Networks and computers tend to grow together, and I think that AI is obviously a new kind of computer and crypto is a new kind of network." benahorowitz.eth on Moonshots with Peter H. Diamandis, MD
2:16

Ben Horowitz on the infrastructure behind the AI economy: "Crypto is the natural money for AI because it’s internet-native money." "AI is global. Crypto is global." "There needs to be not just a ledger of money, but probably a ledger of truth for AI to really fulfill its potential." "I think people are probably underestimating how crypto and AI work together to form the AI economy." "Networks and computers tend to grow together, and I think that AI is obviously a new kind of computer and crypto is a new kind of network." benahorowitz.eth on Moonshots with Peter H. Diamandis, MD

a16z

237,795 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Replit CEO Amjad Masad on why going direct wins: "Whenever there's a piece of communication or a story I wanna tell, and there's a choice between public and private, I might bias towards public. I often write something publicly and then paste it on Slack." "Being yourself is kind of a big radical thing that maybe started happening with Elon maybe 10 years ago. CEOs were supposed to be this very polished thing. They had to be filtered through this prism of PR, and journalists were kind of the way to get to the public." "Zuck changed the entire narrative around him by just being himself and actually talking directly to people." Amjad Masad Erik Torenberg
1:13

Replit CEO Amjad Masad on why going direct wins: "Whenever there's a piece of communication or a story I wanna tell, and there's a choice between public and private, I might bias towards public. I often write something publicly and then paste it on Slack." "Being yourself is kind of a big radical thing that maybe started happening with Elon maybe 10 years ago. CEOs were supposed to be this very polished thing. They had to be filtered through this prism of PR, and journalists were kind of the way to get to the public." "Zuck changed the entire narrative around him by just being himself and actually talking directly to people." Amjad Masad Erik Torenberg

a16z

34,924 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten