Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

David Sinclair's lab just discovered that the same technology that reverses aging also kills cancer cells. His team has been using epigenetic reprogramming to reset old cells back to a younger state. It works. Old cells become young again. But when they tried it on cancer cells, something unexpected... happened. The cancer cells didn't get younger. They killed themselves. Sinclair (David Sinclair) explained why. Cancer cells survive by ignoring the DNA damage inside them. They're filled with it. But they've shut down the part of the cell that would normally detect it and trigger self-destruction. Epigenetic reprogramming wakes that system back up. Sinclair put it this way: the cancer cell wakes up from its zombie-like state, looks at its own chromosomes, realizes they're destroyed, and says "I better kill myself." And it does. A normal cell gets reprogrammed and becomes young again. A cancer cell gets reprogrammed and destroys itself. Same technology. Two opposite outcomes. Both exactly what you'd want. His team has shown this works across many types of cancer. Side note: David Sinclair is speaking on May 6th at SynBioBeta this year - discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists who matter in this space will be in the room. Link for tickets below.show more

John Cumbers

18,809 subscribers

95,588 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

David Sinclair's lab just reversed infertility in mice that had been infertile for 6 months. They took 16-month-old mice, the equivalent of a woman well past menopause, and made them produce offspring again. The belief has always been that mammals run out of eggs and that's final. Sinclair's lab proved otherwise. They did it using NMN, a molecule that boosts energy levels in your cells. And it worked. Now his team is working on applying something even more powerful - epigenetic reprogramming - to women's fertility Sinclair was blunt about the problem. After 30, fertility drops dramatically. By the time many women are established in their careers, their window is closing or closed. He called it unfair. Men can have children at 50 without thinking twice. Women face a biological deadline that no one in science has seriously tried to move. His lab is now trying to move it. If this works in humans, it doesn't just extend fertility. It gives women back the choice that biology took away. — David Sinclair (David Sinclair) Side note: David Sinclair is speaking on May 6th at SynBioBeta this year - discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If health and longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists important in this space will be in the room. Link for tickets below.

David Sinclair's lab just reversed infertility in mice that had been infertile for 6 months. They took 16-month-old mice, the equivalent of a woman well past menopause, and made them produce offspring again. The belief has always been that mammals run out of eggs and that's final. Sinclair's lab proved otherwise. They did it using NMN, a molecule that boosts energy levels in your cells. And it worked. Now his team is working on applying something even more powerful - epigenetic reprogramming - to women's fertility Sinclair was blunt about the problem. After 30, fertility drops dramatically. By the time many women are established in their careers, their window is closing or closed. He called it unfair. Men can have children at 50 without thinking twice. Women face a biological deadline that no one in science has seriously tried to move. His lab is now trying to move it. If this works in humans, it doesn't just extend fertility. It gives women back the choice that biology took away. — David Sinclair (David Sinclair) Side note: David Sinclair is speaking on May 6th at SynBioBeta this year - discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If health and longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists important in this space will be in the room. Link for tickets below.

John Cumbers

55,220 views • 3 months ago

🚨Here's what a lot of people misunderstand about cancer treatment, says drpaulmarik: "Cancer is not homogeneous. The somatic mutation theory—which is the current theory in which treatment is based—posits that you have a mutation in a single cell, and that gives rise to a whole population of cells that look the same and have the same mutation. But the Cancer Genome Atlas has shown that that theory is completely wrong. The cancer cells are very heterogeneous, so they're made up of very different populations of cells with different mutations, and one of the populations is the cancer stem cell. It's a sub-population of the cancer. These are generally slow-growing, but they're distinct in that they have the ability to divide indefinitely and grow indefinitely, and can change their characteristics. Basically, if you get rid of the fast-dividing cells, which is the cancer, you're left with the stem cells, which then become the roots, which grow back to form the tumor" sometimes years later. Conventional chemotherapy gets rid of the fast-dividing regular cancer cells but *NOT* the stem cells. So the key question is: how do you get rid of the stem cells? “There are a number of repurposed drugs that do it, and this has been well-established in scientific medical literature. One of the most effective treatments to knock out the stem cell is the famous horse deworming medicine," says drpaulmarik. Yes, ivermectin. Independent Medical Alliance

🚨Here's what a lot of people misunderstand about cancer treatment, says drpaulmarik: "Cancer is not homogeneous. The somatic mutation theory—which is the current theory in which treatment is based—posits that you have a mutation in a single cell, and that gives rise to a whole population of cells that look the same and have the same mutation. But the Cancer Genome Atlas has shown that that theory is completely wrong. The cancer cells are very heterogeneous, so they're made up of very different populations of cells with different mutations, and one of the populations is the cancer stem cell. It's a sub-population of the cancer. These are generally slow-growing, but they're distinct in that they have the ability to divide indefinitely and grow indefinitely, and can change their characteristics. Basically, if you get rid of the fast-dividing cells, which is the cancer, you're left with the stem cells, which then become the roots, which grow back to form the tumor" sometimes years later. Conventional chemotherapy gets rid of the fast-dividing regular cancer cells but NOT the stem cells. So the key question is: how do you get rid of the stem cells? “There are a number of repurposed drugs that do it, and this has been well-established in scientific medical literature. One of the most effective treatments to knock out the stem cell is the famous horse deworming medicine," says drpaulmarik. Yes, ivermectin. Independent Medical Alliance

Jan Jekielek

96,002 views • 1 year ago

🚨ImmunityBio’s Anktiva: A New FDA-Approved Immunotherapy for certain bladder cancer. They are also developing treatments that may reduce the need for strong chemo, for blood cancer, lung cancer, brain cancer, and more. Broader approvals may take time. Someone call the President and fast-track this. Dr. Pat Soon-Shiong leads development beyond typical biotech efforts. Most cancer medicines, like chemotherapy, work by poisoning fast-growing cells to kill the cancer. This also hurts healthy cells, causing side effects like hair loss and weakness. Anktiva is different. It is an immunotherapy that wakes up your body’s own immune cells; natural killer cells and T cells to hunt and destroy cancer cells themselves. It acts like a booster shot for your immune system, using a protein called IL-15 to make these cells multiply and remember how to fight cancer long-term. ImmunityBio is different from most companies because of 3 big unique things: 1. They wake up 3 kinds of fighter cells at the same time: • NK cells (natural killers) • CD8 T cells (main attackers) • CD4 T cells (helpers) These three work together like a basketball team. This makes the body remember the cancer for a long time (maybe years). 2. They have a special cell line called NK-92. → It’s like buying frozen pizza instead of making dough from scratch every time. Doctors can just thaw it and give it to any patient. No need to take cells from the sick kid, customize them, and make them super weak with hospital chemo (that’s what normal CAR-T does). 3. Their medicine Anktiva gives a long, steady boost to the immune cells. Older drugs (like IL-2) gave a short, crazy boost that made people very sick. Anktiva is seems safer, so far. Exciting to follow the development. Interview: Chris Cuomo (NewsNation) — “Killing Cancer”

🚨ImmunityBio’s Anktiva: A New FDA-Approved Immunotherapy for certain bladder cancer. They are also developing treatments that may reduce the need for strong chemo, for blood cancer, lung cancer, brain cancer, and more. Broader approvals may take time. Someone call the President and fast-track this. Dr. Pat Soon-Shiong leads development beyond typical biotech efforts. Most cancer medicines, like chemotherapy, work by poisoning fast-growing cells to kill the cancer. This also hurts healthy cells, causing side effects like hair loss and weakness. Anktiva is different. It is an immunotherapy that wakes up your body’s own immune cells; natural killer cells and T cells to hunt and destroy cancer cells themselves. It acts like a booster shot for your immune system, using a protein called IL-15 to make these cells multiply and remember how to fight cancer long-term. ImmunityBio is different from most companies because of 3 big unique things: 1. They wake up 3 kinds of fighter cells at the same time: • NK cells (natural killers) • CD8 T cells (main attackers) • CD4 T cells (helpers) These three work together like a basketball team. This makes the body remember the cancer for a long time (maybe years). 2. They have a special cell line called NK-92. → It’s like buying frozen pizza instead of making dough from scratch every time. Doctors can just thaw it and give it to any patient. No need to take cells from the sick kid, customize them, and make them super weak with hospital chemo (that’s what normal CAR-T does). 3. Their medicine Anktiva gives a long, steady boost to the immune cells. Older drugs (like IL-2) gave a short, crazy boost that made people very sick. Anktiva is seems safer, so far. Exciting to follow the development. Interview: Chris Cuomo (NewsNation) — “Killing Cancer”

Black Panther Capital

40,249 views • 5 months ago

Cancer Has a Proven Frequency “Kill Switch” 🧬⚡️ In 1986, the US Government granted Patent 4,622,952 for a technology that destroys cancer cells with zero side effects. No chemo. No radiation. Just resonance. The science is based on a narrow 1°C thermal window: cancer cells die at 45.5°C, while healthy cells can survive up to 46.5°C. The Gordon Method: 📍 Resonant Absorption: Every cell vibrates at a specific frequency. Cancer cells, with their altered DNA, have a different “signature” than healthy cells. 📍 Internal Heating: By sweeping an EM field to 450 kHz, only the cancer cells absorb energy. They heat from the inside out and disintegrate. 📍 The Result: Healthy tissue remains unaffected because it isn’t “tuned” to that frequency. It was tested, it worked, and it was buried. Why? Because a one-time frequency treatment doesn’t create the recurring revenue of chemotherapy. [h/t HarmonicEarthTheory on IG]

Cancer Has a Proven Frequency “Kill Switch” 🧬⚡️ In 1986, the US Government granted Patent 4,622,952 for a technology that destroys cancer cells with zero side effects. No chemo. No radiation. Just resonance. The science is based on a narrow 1°C thermal window: cancer cells die at 45.5°C, while healthy cells can survive up to 46.5°C. The Gordon Method: 📍 Resonant Absorption: Every cell vibrates at a specific frequency. Cancer cells, with their altered DNA, have a different “signature” than healthy cells. 📍 Internal Heating: By sweeping an EM field to 450 kHz, only the cancer cells absorb energy. They heat from the inside out and disintegrate. 📍 The Result: Healthy tissue remains unaffected because it isn’t “tuned” to that frequency. It was tested, it worked, and it was buried. Why? Because a one-time frequency treatment doesn’t create the recurring revenue of chemotherapy. [h/t HarmonicEarthTheory on IG]

₿en Wehrman

111,842 views • 9 days ago

Dr. David Sinclair says his lab at Harvard grew a miniature human brain in a dish. Then two small black dots appeared on its surface. They were eyes. These brains are grown from single human cells. They develop the same structures found in a full human brain... They even have measurable brain waves... And under a microscope, you can see calcium signals firing like fireworks. This indicates neurons are communicating with each other in the same way neurons in your brain are firing right now as you read this. After about a year, the firing fades and the brain loses function. Sinclair says when his team treats these aging brains with three "longevity" genes called OSK, the firing comes back on. They have also introduced Alzheimer's disease into these brains. Using the same three genes, it reverses. He says this technology is not limited to brains. His lab has reversed aging in the eye, liver, kidney, and skin. Every tissue responds to the same treatment. Now the first human trial is coming. — David Sinclair (David Sinclair) on Tom Bilyeu's (Tom Bilyeu) podcast PS. David Sinclair is speaking at SynBioBeta on May 6th this year, discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. Tickets available in the comments below.

Dr. David Sinclair says his lab at Harvard grew a miniature human brain in a dish. Then two small black dots appeared on its surface. They were eyes. These brains are grown from single human cells. They develop the same structures found in a full human brain... They even have measurable brain waves... And under a microscope, you can see calcium signals firing like fireworks. This indicates neurons are communicating with each other in the same way neurons in your brain are firing right now as you read this. After about a year, the firing fades and the brain loses function. Sinclair says when his team treats these aging brains with three "longevity" genes called OSK, the firing comes back on. They have also introduced Alzheimer's disease into these brains. Using the same three genes, it reverses. He says this technology is not limited to brains. His lab has reversed aging in the eye, liver, kidney, and skin. Every tissue responds to the same treatment. Now the first human trial is coming. — David Sinclair (David Sinclair) on Tom Bilyeu's (Tom Bilyeu) podcast PS. David Sinclair is speaking at SynBioBeta on May 6th this year, discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. Tickets available in the comments below.

John Cumbers

157,203 views • 2 months ago

🚨 IVERMECTIN AND CANCER: WHAT THE RESEARCH ACTUALLY SHOWS A researcher recently shared what they found after looking into Ivermectin and cancer. They discovered over 300 peer-reviewed papers on PubMed examining Ivermectin in cancer. While most of this research is preclinical (cell lines, mice, and rats), the body of work is extensive and covers many different mechanisms. Key points from the research include: ✅ Ivermectin appears to target cancer stem cells, which standard chemotherapy often does not effectively kill. ✅ It can help reverse multi-drug resistance in cancer cells and may sensitise them to chemotherapy. ✅ It acts as a radio sensitizer, potentially making cancer cells more responsive to radiation. ✅ It can inhibit angiogenesis, limiting the tumor’s ability to form new blood vessels. ✅ It may inhibit enzymes involved in cancer cell detachment and spread, reducing the potential for metastasis. The researcher noted that Ivermectin is an off-patent, low-cost drug. Because of this, there has been little financial incentive to fund large-scale human trials in oncology, which is why most of the data remains preclinical.

🚨 IVERMECTIN AND CANCER: WHAT THE RESEARCH ACTUALLY SHOWS A researcher recently shared what they found after looking into Ivermectin and cancer. They discovered over 300 peer-reviewed papers on PubMed examining Ivermectin in cancer. While most of this research is preclinical (cell lines, mice, and rats), the body of work is extensive and covers many different mechanisms. Key points from the research include: ✅ Ivermectin appears to target cancer stem cells, which standard chemotherapy often does not effectively kill. ✅ It can help reverse multi-drug resistance in cancer cells and may sensitise them to chemotherapy. ✅ It acts as a radio sensitizer, potentially making cancer cells more responsive to radiation. ✅ It can inhibit angiogenesis, limiting the tumor’s ability to form new blood vessels. ✅ It may inhibit enzymes involved in cancer cell detachment and spread, reducing the potential for metastasis. The researcher noted that Ivermectin is an off-patent, low-cost drug. Because of this, there has been little financial incentive to fund large-scale human trials in oncology, which is why most of the data remains preclinical.

Dr. Zakaria MD

18,030 views • 1 day ago

David Sinclair says the first person to live to 150 is a teenager who's alive today. He's taken flak from colleagues for years over this prediction. He doesn't care. He still stands by it. "The first person to live to 150 has already been born." Here's why: A 14-year-old today has 80+ years of exponential technological progress ahead of them. Just look at what's happened in the last 10 years: • His lab reversed aging in monkey eyes by 95% • AI now does in 2 months what would have taken thousands of years. • His team has oral molecules that made old mice young again in 4 weeks • The first human age-reversal trial begins in January And that's just the beginning. There'll be more advancements in major medical technologies and therapies soon, including in: • Gene therapy • AI-designed drugs • Whole-body rejuvenation • Epigenetic reprogramming All of it will arrive within a teenager's lifetime. Sinclair believes this is a realistic projection of where the science is heading. Sinclair's advice for everyone is to stay healthy long enough to intercept what's coming. — David Sinclair (David Sinclair) on Peter Diamandis' (Peter H. Diamandis, MD) Moonshots podcast PS. David Sinclair is speaking at SynBioBeta on May 6th this year, discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists shaping this space will be in the room. Grab your ticket in the comments below.

David Sinclair says the first person to live to 150 is a teenager who's alive today. He's taken flak from colleagues for years over this prediction. He doesn't care. He still stands by it. "The first person to live to 150 has already been born." Here's why: A 14-year-old today has 80+ years of exponential technological progress ahead of them. Just look at what's happened in the last 10 years: • His lab reversed aging in monkey eyes by 95% • AI now does in 2 months what would have taken thousands of years. • His team has oral molecules that made old mice young again in 4 weeks • The first human age-reversal trial begins in January And that's just the beginning. There'll be more advancements in major medical technologies and therapies soon, including in: • Gene therapy • AI-designed drugs • Whole-body rejuvenation • Epigenetic reprogramming All of it will arrive within a teenager's lifetime. Sinclair believes this is a realistic projection of where the science is heading. Sinclair's advice for everyone is to stay healthy long enough to intercept what's coming. — David Sinclair (David Sinclair) on Peter Diamandis' (Peter H. Diamandis, MD) Moonshots podcast PS. David Sinclair is speaking at SynBioBeta on May 6th this year, discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists shaping this space will be in the room. Grab your ticket in the comments below.

John Cumbers

84,263 views • 3 months ago

Bee venom can kill aggressive breast cancer cells in just 60 minutes. UCLA research showed that honeybee venom and its main component, melittin, rapidly destroyed triple-negative and HER2-enriched breast cancer cells, some of the most aggressive types. It worked by interfering with key growth receptors (EGFR and HER2) on the cancer cell membrane. The 2020 study (and subsequent research) found melittin induced massive cell death within 60 minutes in lab-tested human breast cancer lines, while having minimal effect on healthy cells. Follow-up meta-analyses have confirmed its potent anti-cancer activity, especially against hard-to-treat subtypes. This is the kind of outside-the-box thinking we need, cheap, natural compounds that could one day offer accessible options alongside conventional treatments.

Bee venom can kill aggressive breast cancer cells in just 60 minutes. UCLA research showed that honeybee venom and its main component, melittin, rapidly destroyed triple-negative and HER2-enriched breast cancer cells, some of the most aggressive types. It worked by interfering with key growth receptors (EGFR and HER2) on the cancer cell membrane. The 2020 study (and subsequent research) found melittin induced massive cell death within 60 minutes in lab-tested human breast cancer lines, while having minimal effect on healthy cells. Follow-up meta-analyses have confirmed its potent anti-cancer activity, especially against hard-to-treat subtypes. This is the kind of outside-the-box thinking we need, cheap, natural compounds that could one day offer accessible options alongside conventional treatments.

Camus

23,218 views • 1 month ago

Cancer Cells and Parasites Feed the Same Way. That's Why This Drug Combination Works. Both drain energy from the host using similar biological mechanisms. Ivermectin and mebendazole — developed to fight parasites — disrupt that process in cancer cells too. They reduce proliferation, cut off the blood supply tumors try to build, and accelerate the packaging and termination of cancer cells. Over 100 pre-clinical studies confirm it. The human data just confirmed it at scale. Join the Fight: Courtesy of Real America's Voice Real America's Voice (RAV), The Steve Gruber Show Steve Gruber #MedicalFreedom

Cancer Cells and Parasites Feed the Same Way. That's Why This Drug Combination Works. Both drain energy from the host using similar biological mechanisms. Ivermectin and mebendazole — developed to fight parasites — disrupt that process in cancer cells too. They reduce proliferation, cut off the blood supply tumors try to build, and accelerate the packaging and termination of cancer cells. Over 100 pre-clinical studies confirm it. The human data just confirmed it at scale. Join the Fight: Courtesy of Real America's Voice Real America's Voice (RAV), The Steve Gruber Show Steve Gruber #MedicalFreedom

McCullough Foundation

15,960 views • 2 months ago

Tumor cells destroyed by LED light — up to 92% of skin cancer cells killed in 30 minutes while healthy cells stay intact. New lab research (Portugal + Texas, published in ACS Nano): Infrared LEDs heat zinc oxide nanoflakes that selectively target and destroy cancer cells. Artur Pinto (University of Porto): This could be a safe, low-cost alternative to chemotherapy and lasers — and they’re now working toward breast cancer applications. The method exploits the unique heat sensitivity and uptake of cancer cells versus normal cells, achieving high selectivity in early tests. This is early-stage lab work, but the selectivity and simplicity are promising. What do you think — could light-based therapies become a mainstream cancer tool, or is it too early to get excited? Your take 👇 Credit: FOCUS online (YouTube)

Tumor cells destroyed by LED light — up to 92% of skin cancer cells killed in 30 minutes while healthy cells stay intact. New lab research (Portugal + Texas, published in ACS Nano): Infrared LEDs heat zinc oxide nanoflakes that selectively target and destroy cancer cells. Artur Pinto (University of Porto): This could be a safe, low-cost alternative to chemotherapy and lasers — and they’re now working toward breast cancer applications. The method exploits the unique heat sensitivity and uptake of cancer cells versus normal cells, achieving high selectivity in early tests. This is early-stage lab work, but the selectivity and simplicity are promising. What do you think — could light-based therapies become a mainstream cancer tool, or is it too early to get excited? Your take 👇 Credit: FOCUS online (YouTube)

Camus

50,526 views • 3 months ago

🚨 A HARVARD TRAINED MD JUST EXPLAINED WHY IVERMECTIN IS BEING STUDIED IN CANCER RESEARCH AGAIN And the internet is paying VERY close attention. Dr. Shintani says researchers have explored how Ivermectin may interact with cancer cells in laboratory and preclinical studies involving: • Breast cancer • Prostate cancer • Colon cancer • Lung cancer • Leukemia • Liver cancer • Stomach cancer Why scientists are interested: ✅ Studies suggest Ivermectin may trigger apoptosis, also known as programmed cancer cell death ✅ Researchers are investigating how it may affect tumor growth pathways and cancer stem-like cells ✅ Some preclinical studies are exploring Ivermectin alongside chemotherapy in laboratory models And THAT is why repurposed medicine conversations have exploded across podcasts, TikTok, X, and cancer forums worldwide. Not because the science is settled. Because people are shocked that a low-cost anti-parasitic drug is even being discussed in cancer research at all. But whether critics like it or not… The public conversation around repurposed drugs is getting impossible to ignore.

🚨 A HARVARD TRAINED MD JUST EXPLAINED WHY IVERMECTIN IS BEING STUDIED IN CANCER RESEARCH AGAIN And the internet is paying VERY close attention. Dr. Shintani says researchers have explored how Ivermectin may interact with cancer cells in laboratory and preclinical studies involving: • Breast cancer • Prostate cancer • Colon cancer • Lung cancer • Leukemia • Liver cancer • Stomach cancer Why scientists are interested: ✅ Studies suggest Ivermectin may trigger apoptosis, also known as programmed cancer cell death ✅ Researchers are investigating how it may affect tumor growth pathways and cancer stem-like cells ✅ Some preclinical studies are exploring Ivermectin alongside chemotherapy in laboratory models And THAT is why repurposed medicine conversations have exploded across podcasts, TikTok, X, and cancer forums worldwide. Not because the science is settled. Because people are shocked that a low-cost anti-parasitic drug is even being discussed in cancer research at all. But whether critics like it or not… The public conversation around repurposed drugs is getting impossible to ignore.

Joe Tippens

10,621 views • 1 month ago

Scientists just figured out how to reverse aging using AI. And this is a massive breakthrough. We can now reprogram any human cell back to age 20. Heart cells, brain cells, skin cells, all reset to their biological prime. And here’s the wildest part…the technology to do this, has already existed since 2012 (it won the Nobel Prize). But the real breakthrough wasn’t possible until this year, when they supercharged it with AI. It’s a wild story. So in 2006, scientists discovered Yamanaka factors. They’re proteins that can basically convert any normal cell into a universal stem cell. Now this was a huge deal, because these stem cells are basically like magic healers. If you have torn muscle tissue, you could inject these stem cells into the area and they will turn into the youthful muscle cells you need. So Yamanaka factors were this insane breakthrough, because they allowed any human to turn any cell you already have into these magic healers. But, there was one big problem… It turns out, the original Yamanaka factors weren’t very good at this stem cell conversion. They could do it, but they just weren’t very reliable. Enter OpenAI...and this is where things get crazy. OpenAI designed a special AI model built specifically to create new proteins. Think of it like ChatGPT but for protein engineering. So they took all the Yamanaka research and asked this new AI to go ham on improving it. And get this… Their version was 50x more effective than the original. They tested it on 50 year old cells and it successfully started repairing 30% of their cells in just 7 days. This is just science fiction…it actually happened. And it sounds crazy, but in a few years, humans will be able to take a shot that will literally reverse the age of their cells.

Scientists just figured out how to reverse aging using AI. And this is a massive breakthrough. We can now reprogram any human cell back to age 20. Heart cells, brain cells, skin cells, all reset to their biological prime. And here’s the wildest part…the technology to do this, has already existed since 2012 (it won the Nobel Prize). But the real breakthrough wasn’t possible until this year, when they supercharged it with AI. It’s a wild story. So in 2006, scientists discovered Yamanaka factors. They’re proteins that can basically convert any normal cell into a universal stem cell. Now this was a huge deal, because these stem cells are basically like magic healers. If you have torn muscle tissue, you could inject these stem cells into the area and they will turn into the youthful muscle cells you need. So Yamanaka factors were this insane breakthrough, because they allowed any human to turn any cell you already have into these magic healers. But, there was one big problem… It turns out, the original Yamanaka factors weren’t very good at this stem cell conversion. They could do it, but they just weren’t very reliable. Enter OpenAI...and this is where things get crazy. OpenAI designed a special AI model built specifically to create new proteins. Think of it like ChatGPT but for protein engineering. So they took all the Yamanaka research and asked this new AI to go ham on improving it. And get this… Their version was 50x more effective than the original. They tested it on 50 year old cells and it successfully started repairing 30% of their cells in just 7 days. This is just science fiction…it actually happened. And it sounds crazy, but in a few years, humans will be able to take a shot that will literally reverse the age of their cells.

Whiplash347

68,643 views • 8 months ago

The Chemotherapy Paradox – A "Cure" That Preserves the Root of Cancer? You've been told chemotherapy is a cornerstone of cancer care. But what if the standard of care is fundamentally flawed, suppressing the very system designed to heal you while protecting the engine that drives the disease? In a stunning exposition, Dr. Paul Marik pulls back the curtain on oncology's biggest dilemma. Here's the shocking truth: - Chemotherapy annihilates your immune army. It wipes out your natural killer cells and T-cells—the very soldiers your body needs to fight cancer. You are immune-suppressed, allowing the tumor a clearer path to proliferate. - Chemotherapy preserves the cancer stem cell. This is the root of the tumor. While chemo kills rapidly dividing cells, it often leaves the stem cell—the queen bee—untouched. From this root, the cancer indefinitely divides, mutates, and regrows. - Some chemo drugs may even STIMULATE the stem cell. That's right. The very treatment intended to kill cancer can, in some cases, fuel its source. "So you can't cure the patient unless you get rid of the cancer stem cell," states Dr. Marik. "Interestingly, chemotherapy doesn't kill the stem cell." This explains why "remission" is not a "cure." The cancer can return 7, 8, or 10 years later because the root was never addressed. You are in remission, not cured. The conclusion? The high-dose, "burn-and-cut" approach of traditional oncology is not holistic. It weakens the host and empowers the enemy's most resilient forces. Dr. Marik confirms: The efficacy depends on the tumor type. Cancers with a low percentage of stem cells can see long-term remission. But for many, it's a ticking time bomb. This isn't an opinion; it's a biological reality. It’s time for a paradigm shift. Share this to spark a crucial conversation. The future of oncology depends on it.

The Chemotherapy Paradox – A "Cure" That Preserves the Root of Cancer? You've been told chemotherapy is a cornerstone of cancer care. But what if the standard of care is fundamentally flawed, suppressing the very system designed to heal you while protecting the engine that drives the disease? In a stunning exposition, Dr. Paul Marik pulls back the curtain on oncology's biggest dilemma. Here's the shocking truth: - Chemotherapy annihilates your immune army. It wipes out your natural killer cells and T-cells—the very soldiers your body needs to fight cancer. You are immune-suppressed, allowing the tumor a clearer path to proliferate. - Chemotherapy preserves the cancer stem cell. This is the root of the tumor. While chemo kills rapidly dividing cells, it often leaves the stem cell—the queen bee—untouched. From this root, the cancer indefinitely divides, mutates, and regrows. - Some chemo drugs may even STIMULATE the stem cell. That's right. The very treatment intended to kill cancer can, in some cases, fuel its source. "So you can't cure the patient unless you get rid of the cancer stem cell," states Dr. Marik. "Interestingly, chemotherapy doesn't kill the stem cell." This explains why "remission" is not a "cure." The cancer can return 7, 8, or 10 years later because the root was never addressed. You are in remission, not cured. The conclusion? The high-dose, "burn-and-cut" approach of traditional oncology is not holistic. It weakens the host and empowers the enemy's most resilient forces. Dr. Marik confirms: The efficacy depends on the tumor type. Cancers with a low percentage of stem cells can see long-term remission. But for many, it's a ticking time bomb. This isn't an opinion; it's a biological reality. It’s time for a paradigm shift. Share this to spark a crucial conversation. The future of oncology depends on it.

Camus

69,487 views • 8 months ago

$David Sinclair just revealed one of the biggest studies on nattokinase. A comprehensive Chinese study of 1,067 people found that nattokinase reversed cardiovascular disease by removing up to 95% of arterial plaque in one year. This supplement is an enzyme from fermented soybeans and costs almost nothing. Sinclair has been taking it daily for a couple of years. He measures his carotid artery with ultrasound and says there's no plaque buildup at all. Peter Diamandis takes it too. He believes you need at least 6,000 fibrinolytic units per day to reap the benefits. For context: • Statins cost hundreds per month and come with side effects. • Surgical interventions can cost thousands of dollars Nattokinase costs a fraction of both. Sinclair's caveat: "Do this with the knowledge of your physician." But the data exists. A study of over 1,000 people and up to 95% plaque removal in just 12 months. And the man whose lab is reversing aging takes it every day. — David Sinclair (David Sinclair) on Peter Diamandis' (Peter H. Diamandis, MD) Moonshots podcast PS. David Sinclair is speaking at SynBioBeta on May 6th this year, discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists shaping this space will be in the room. Grab your ticket in the comments below.$

David Sinclair just revealed one of the biggest studies on nattokinase. A comprehensive Chinese study of 1,067 people found that nattokinase reversed cardiovascular disease by removing up to 95% of arterial plaque in one year. This supplement is an enzyme from fermented soybeans and costs almost nothing. Sinclair has been taking it daily for a couple of years. He measures his carotid artery with ultrasound and says there's no plaque buildup at all. Peter Diamandis takes it too. He believes you need at least 6,000 fibrinolytic units per day to reap the benefits. For context: • Statins cost hundreds per month and come with side effects. • Surgical interventions can cost thousands of dollars Nattokinase costs a fraction of both. Sinclair's caveat: "Do this with the knowledge of your physician." But the data exists. A study of over 1,000 people and up to 95% plaque removal in just 12 months. And the man whose lab is reversing aging takes it every day. — David Sinclair (David Sinclair) on Peter Diamandis' (Peter H. Diamandis, MD) Moonshots podcast PS. David Sinclair is speaking at SynBioBeta on May 6th this year, discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists shaping this space will be in the room. Grab your ticket in the comments below.

John Cumbers

838,997 views • 3 months ago

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Oh-oh! First experiments of genetic vaccines getting absorbed by human cells completed - Prof Sucharit Bhakdi reveals. ----------------------------- Our two lady scientists who are just brilliant, they took cells, human cells, and immersed these cells in the vaccine and they found, and these are the first experiments that have ever been done, okay, that the human cells immediately took up the vaccines and the DNA and the chromosomes, and the chromosomes, bacterial chromosomes, entered the cells and these cells immediately started making the spike protein in horrendous quantity and they have quantified this, they have shown what happens to the spike protein, that it is stable, that it is shed into the blood, into the circulation, they have shown that they can measure this in the blood, they can measure this anywhere actually, and they have shown that the plasmid and the spike production goes on for many, many days. So, what did our girls do? They sent their human cells that had been transfected to Kevin McKernan, begging the question, Kevin, can you find any chromosomal integration of bacterial DNA in the human cell chromosomes? Do you know the answer? He put it up in his substack one week ago, and the answer is yes. He's found it. ------------------------------------- Kevin McKernan

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Oh-oh! First experiments of genetic vaccines getting absorbed by human cells completed - Prof Sucharit Bhakdi reveals. ----------------------------- Our two lady scientists who are just brilliant, they took cells, human cells, and immersed these cells in the vaccine and they found, and these are the first experiments that have ever been done, okay, that the human cells immediately took up the vaccines and the DNA and the chromosomes, and the chromosomes, bacterial chromosomes, entered the cells and these cells immediately started making the spike protein in horrendous quantity and they have quantified this, they have shown what happens to the spike protein, that it is stable, that it is shed into the blood, into the circulation, they have shown that they can measure this in the blood, they can measure this anywhere actually, and they have shown that the plasmid and the spike production goes on for many, many days. So, what did our girls do? They sent their human cells that had been transfected to Kevin McKernan, begging the question, Kevin, can you find any chromosomal integration of bacterial DNA in the human cell chromosomes? Do you know the answer? He put it up in his substack one week ago, and the answer is yes. He's found it. ------------------------------------- Kevin McKernan

aussie17

333,911 views • 2 years ago

🚨 SHOCKING DISCOVERY THEY BURIED: Hydroxychloroquine doesn’t just fight viruses — it turns viruses into precision-guided cancer killers. It allows viruses to attack cancer cells while leaving healthy cells completely untouched. This comes straight from Dr. Richard Urso (ophthalmologist and member of America’s Frontline Doctors) in a powerful presentation. Why was this information suppressed and the data obscured? Because a cheap, decades-old drug that could selectively destroy cancer would be catastrophic for the multi-trillion-dollar cancer industry. They don’t want you to know this. They want you dependent on expensive treatments forever. The truth is out. Share it before it gets buried again.

🚨 SHOCKING DISCOVERY THEY BURIED: Hydroxychloroquine doesn’t just fight viruses — it turns viruses into precision-guided cancer killers. It allows viruses to attack cancer cells while leaving healthy cells completely untouched. This comes straight from Dr. Richard Urso (ophthalmologist and member of America’s Frontline Doctors) in a powerful presentation. Why was this information suppressed and the data obscured? Because a cheap, decades-old drug that could selectively destroy cancer would be catastrophic for the multi-trillion-dollar cancer industry. They don’t want you to know this. They want you dependent on expensive treatments forever. The truth is out. Share it before it gets buried again.

Dr. Dawn Michael

738,595 views • 1 month ago

🚨 WHY ARE THERE OVER 400 PUBLISHED PAPERS ON IVERMECTIN AND CANCER? Because researchers discovered something unexpected. Ivermectin doesn't just target parasites. According to preclinical research, it appears to interact with cancer cells through multiple biological pathways. One of the most discussed? 📌 Cancer Stem Cells These are the cells believed to survive treatment, remain dormant for years, and potentially contribute to recurrence and spread. According to Dr. William Makis: 💊 Chemotherapy primarily targets rapidly dividing cancer cells. 💊 Ivermectin has been studied for its potential effects on cancer stem cells. That's why some researchers believe the combination deserves attention. But that's only part of the story. Researchers have also investigated ivermectin's potential ability to: ✅ Target cancer stem cells ✅ Influence tumor signaling pathways ✅ Alter cancer cell behavior ✅ Reverse chemotherapy resistance One of the most fascinating findings involves chemotherapy resistance. Over time, some cancer cells develop the ability to push chemotherapy drugs back out of the cell. Researchers have reported that ivermectin may interfere with these resistance mechanisms, potentially making cancer cells susceptible again. And then there's Fenbendazole and Mebendazole. While Ivermectin is being studied for one set of mechanisms, Fenbendazole and Mebendazole appear to work differently. Researchers have investigated their potential ability to: 📌 Block glucose transporters on cancer cells 📌 Reduce the cell's ability to use glucose as fuel 📌 Interfere with pathways associated with tumor growth Think about that. Different compounds. Different mechanisms. The same goal. That's why scientists continue publishing study after study. Not because these compounds are a fad. Because researchers keep uncovering new biological pathways worth investigating. And that's why the conversation around Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole continues to grow. 💊 If you’re looking into these drugs, check out Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole from RXMEDS.STORE. #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #Mebendazole #CancerResearch #CancerStemCells #RepurposedDrugs #CancerBiology #RxMeds

🚨 WHY ARE THERE OVER 400 PUBLISHED PAPERS ON IVERMECTIN AND CANCER? Because researchers discovered something unexpected. Ivermectin doesn't just target parasites. According to preclinical research, it appears to interact with cancer cells through multiple biological pathways. One of the most discussed? 📌 Cancer Stem Cells These are the cells believed to survive treatment, remain dormant for years, and potentially contribute to recurrence and spread. According to Dr. William Makis: 💊 Chemotherapy primarily targets rapidly dividing cancer cells. 💊 Ivermectin has been studied for its potential effects on cancer stem cells. That's why some researchers believe the combination deserves attention. But that's only part of the story. Researchers have also investigated ivermectin's potential ability to: ✅ Target cancer stem cells ✅ Influence tumor signaling pathways ✅ Alter cancer cell behavior ✅ Reverse chemotherapy resistance One of the most fascinating findings involves chemotherapy resistance. Over time, some cancer cells develop the ability to push chemotherapy drugs back out of the cell. Researchers have reported that ivermectin may interfere with these resistance mechanisms, potentially making cancer cells susceptible again. And then there's Fenbendazole and Mebendazole. While Ivermectin is being studied for one set of mechanisms, Fenbendazole and Mebendazole appear to work differently. Researchers have investigated their potential ability to: 📌 Block glucose transporters on cancer cells 📌 Reduce the cell's ability to use glucose as fuel 📌 Interfere with pathways associated with tumor growth Think about that. Different compounds. Different mechanisms. The same goal. That's why scientists continue publishing study after study. Not because these compounds are a fad. Because researchers keep uncovering new biological pathways worth investigating. And that's why the conversation around Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole continues to grow. 💊 If you’re looking into these drugs, check out Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and Mebendazole from RXMEDS.STORE. #Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #Mebendazole #CancerResearch #CancerStemCells #RepurposedDrugs #CancerBiology #RxMeds

RXMEDS.STORE

16,612 views • 1 month ago

🚨Big problem! Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "Here's the real sucker punch... the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility... but SV40-associated cancer won't respond well... to chemotherapy... [in fact,] radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive...." This clip of Dr. Humphries (Dr Suzanne Humphries), a medical doctor, board-certified internist, nephrologist, and co-author of Dissolving Illusions, is taken from a presentation posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 12, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And here's the real sucker punch. So you remember how SV40 knocks out that p53 gene and protein, which I talked to you before, the cancer suppressor. And that means that not only can the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility, right? But SV40-associated cancer won't respond well at all to chemotherapy. "And conventional cancer treatments are likely to make cancer actually go wild and not regress because p53, it actually directs cancer cells to die off. It's necessary for chemo and especially for radiation to do the killing that they're supposed to be doing. And the fact that radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive is the entire reason it was used in the Get Castro project, right? You know, radiating the animals first and then doing the gain of function with radiation. That's why they did it. "So you know, this is some older material, just to show you that they've known for a long time that SV40 blocks the effect of cancer treatments. And so there have been children who have died of SV40-related brain tumors. And the parents go and they do research. And this is what they have found. And so these are articles from like 1997. "So again, this is not something that top scientists should have bypassed. So the other brain cancers and solid cancers have been found to contain the SV40. And that the SV40 binds with the tumor-suppressor gene at p53, and it actually stops those tumor cells from undergoing what's called apoptosis, A-P-O-P-T-O-S-I-S, which really means programmed cell death. And that's how you're able to get cancer to regress, you know, when you're doing whatever you're doing traditionally. "Like, even if it's like, look, we know radiation does make tumor cells regress. Do they come back later? Most of the time, yes, they do cancer, you know, chemotherapy. Like, my father got chemotherapy when he had tumors all over his body. We got nine extra months with him, so I was okay with that. But did they all come back to kill him? Yes, they did, but I got an extra nine months. "But the point being that, you get that programmed cell death. But then if there's a P— If it's an SV40-related cancer especially, you're going to wind up with probably a turbo cancer at that point. "Yeah, I'm just going to read this to you because when I said that people knew about this and there were, you know, parents of children who developed brain tumors and testified in front of Congress. This was one of the very well-educated parents. Exposing SV40-positive cancer cells to chemo and radiation does not kill the cells, but simply creates more genetic mutations, making the cancer more aggressive. The bottom line is that SV40 causes human cancer, stops orthodox cancer treatments like chemo and radiation from providing any benefit and can make the cancer even more aggressive."

🚨Big problem! Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "Here's the real sucker punch... the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility... but SV40-associated cancer won't respond well... to chemotherapy... [in fact,] radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive...." This clip of Dr. Humphries (Dr Suzanne Humphries), a medical doctor, board-certified internist, nephrologist, and co-author of Dissolving Illusions, is taken from a presentation posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 12, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And here's the real sucker punch. So you remember how SV40 knocks out that p53 gene and protein, which I talked to you before, the cancer suppressor. And that means that not only can the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility, right? But SV40-associated cancer won't respond well at all to chemotherapy. "And conventional cancer treatments are likely to make cancer actually go wild and not regress because p53, it actually directs cancer cells to die off. It's necessary for chemo and especially for radiation to do the killing that they're supposed to be doing. And the fact that radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive is the entire reason it was used in the Get Castro project, right? You know, radiating the animals first and then doing the gain of function with radiation. That's why they did it. "So you know, this is some older material, just to show you that they've known for a long time that SV40 blocks the effect of cancer treatments. And so there have been children who have died of SV40-related brain tumors. And the parents go and they do research. And this is what they have found. And so these are articles from like 1997. "So again, this is not something that top scientists should have bypassed. So the other brain cancers and solid cancers have been found to contain the SV40. And that the SV40 binds with the tumor-suppressor gene at p53, and it actually stops those tumor cells from undergoing what's called apoptosis, A-P-O-P-T-O-S-I-S, which really means programmed cell death. And that's how you're able to get cancer to regress, you know, when you're doing whatever you're doing traditionally. "Like, even if it's like, look, we know radiation does make tumor cells regress. Do they come back later? Most of the time, yes, they do cancer, you know, chemotherapy. Like, my father got chemotherapy when he had tumors all over his body. We got nine extra months with him, so I was okay with that. But did they all come back to kill him? Yes, they did, but I got an extra nine months. "But the point being that, you get that programmed cell death. But then if there's a P— If it's an SV40-related cancer especially, you're going to wind up with probably a turbo cancer at that point. "Yeah, I'm just going to read this to you because when I said that people knew about this and there were, you know, parents of children who developed brain tumors and testified in front of Congress. This was one of the very well-educated parents. Exposing SV40-positive cancer cells to chemo and radiation does not kill the cells, but simply creates more genetic mutations, making the cancer more aggressive. The bottom line is that SV40 causes human cancer, stops orthodox cancer treatments like chemo and radiation from providing any benefit and can make the cancer even more aggressive."

Sense Receptor

53,395 views • 7 months ago

🚨🚨🚨🇮🇹 Dr. Tullio Simoncini is an Italian oncologist who has proposed a hypothesis regarding the cause and treatment of cancer : •According to his hypothesis, cancer is not a result of genetic mutations or uncontrolled cell growth, but rather a fungal infection caused primarily by the fungus Candida albicans. •Dr. Simoncini believes that cancer cells are actually fungal cells that have adapted to the body's internal environment. •His proposed treatment for cancer involves the use of sodium bicarbonate, also known as baking soda (Nahcolite), which he claims can effectively neutralize the acidic environment in which cancer cells thrive. •By raising the pH level of the tumor environment, Dr. Simoncini suggests that sodium bicarbonate can effectively kill the fungus and halt the progression of cancer. •Some studies have shown that sodium bicarbonate can have anti-cancer effects in certain in vitro and animal models. “Dr. Simoncini treat his patients with Sodium Bicarbonate” Can Cancer be treated with Baking Soda? What does that tell us about cancer? #Cancer #BakingSoda

🚨🚨🚨🇮🇹 Dr. Tullio Simoncini is an Italian oncologist who has proposed a hypothesis regarding the cause and treatment of cancer : •According to his hypothesis, cancer is not a result of genetic mutations or uncontrolled cell growth, but rather a fungal infection caused primarily by the fungus Candida albicans. •Dr. Simoncini believes that cancer cells are actually fungal cells that have adapted to the body's internal environment. •His proposed treatment for cancer involves the use of sodium bicarbonate, also known as baking soda (Nahcolite), which he claims can effectively neutralize the acidic environment in which cancer cells thrive. •By raising the pH level of the tumor environment, Dr. Simoncini suggests that sodium bicarbonate can effectively kill the fungus and halt the progression of cancer. •Some studies have shown that sodium bicarbonate can have anti-cancer effects in certain in vitro and animal models. “Dr. Simoncini treat his patients with Sodium Bicarbonate” Can Cancer be treated with Baking Soda? What does that tell us about cancer? #Cancer #BakingSoda

Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE🦁

836,236 views • 2 years ago

7 Compelling Reasons Why Ivermectin Is a ‘Powerful Drug’ for Fighting Cancer Ivermectin is often recognized–2nd to penicillin–for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. It is safer than Tylenol and brought river blindness to the brink of extinction, but the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Well, it now turns out that ivermectin is not only an effective treatment for COVID-19, but it could also be a “powerful drug” for fighting cancer. Here are 7 reasons why. 1. Multiple Anti-Cancer Effects: Ivermectin impacts at least nine well-defined cancer targets, according to Dr. Alfonso Dueñas-González, an oncologist and senior researcher. He states, "There are at least nine perfectly defined cancer targets affected by ivermectin." 2. Enhances Effects of Chemotherapy and Radiation: Ivermectin not only targets tumor stem cells and promotes cancer cell death but also "enhances the effects of chemo and radiation therapy." This broad impact on the immune system increases the offense against cancers, making it a versatile adjunct to conventional treatments. 3. Inhibits Cancer Cell Cycles: The drug prevents the formation of new cancer cells by inhibiting cancer cell cycles and inducing mitochondrial stress, which leads to the killing of cancer cells. This mechanism is crucial for stopping the proliferation of cancerous cells. 4. Prevents Formation of New Blood Vessels Near Cancer Cells: Ivermectin prevents cancer survival by inhibiting the formation of new blood vessels that transport energy and fuel to cancers. This action starves the cancer cells, hindering their growth and spread. 5. Synergizes with Immunotherapy: Dr. Peter P. Lee, chair of immuno-oncology at the City of Hope, found that ivermectin could synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD1, enhancing the body's immune response to fight cancer. "What we’re learning is that ivermectin is going to be a very powerful drug in the context of really carefully developed immunotherapy combinations," he said. 6. Targets Cancer Stem Cells: Ivermectin preferentially targets cancer stem cells, which are a driver of cancer tumors and relapses. By focusing on these cells, ivermectin attacks the root of cancer's resilience and ability to recur. 7. The Curious Case of Rick Alderson: Mr. Alderson, a retired sawmill worker, “was a dead man walking” and given 6 months to live after his terminal colon cancer had metastasized and spread to his liver, where it had formed 25 distinct tumors. After starting ivermectin, Rick Alderson's carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, which are markers for tumor activity, dropped significantly from 1,498 ng/mL to 13.9 ng/mL in a matter of months. Of the 25 tumors in Mr. Alderson's liver, only three remained after his treatment with ivermectin and chemotherapy, indicating a substantial reduction in tumor burden. Mr. Alderson lived for two more years beyond his initial six-month prognosis, which his wife attributes to the use of ivermectin alongside chemotherapy.

7 Compelling Reasons Why Ivermectin Is a ‘Powerful Drug’ for Fighting Cancer Ivermectin is often recognized–2nd to penicillin–for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. It is safer than Tylenol and brought river blindness to the brink of extinction, but the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Well, it now turns out that ivermectin is not only an effective treatment for COVID-19, but it could also be a “powerful drug” for fighting cancer. Here are 7 reasons why. 1. Multiple Anti-Cancer Effects: Ivermectin impacts at least nine well-defined cancer targets, according to Dr. Alfonso Dueñas-González, an oncologist and senior researcher. He states, "There are at least nine perfectly defined cancer targets affected by ivermectin." 2. Enhances Effects of Chemotherapy and Radiation: Ivermectin not only targets tumor stem cells and promotes cancer cell death but also "enhances the effects of chemo and radiation therapy." This broad impact on the immune system increases the offense against cancers, making it a versatile adjunct to conventional treatments. 3. Inhibits Cancer Cell Cycles: The drug prevents the formation of new cancer cells by inhibiting cancer cell cycles and inducing mitochondrial stress, which leads to the killing of cancer cells. This mechanism is crucial for stopping the proliferation of cancerous cells. 4. Prevents Formation of New Blood Vessels Near Cancer Cells: Ivermectin prevents cancer survival by inhibiting the formation of new blood vessels that transport energy and fuel to cancers. This action starves the cancer cells, hindering their growth and spread. 5. Synergizes with Immunotherapy: Dr. Peter P. Lee, chair of immuno-oncology at the City of Hope, found that ivermectin could synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD1, enhancing the body's immune response to fight cancer. "What we’re learning is that ivermectin is going to be a very powerful drug in the context of really carefully developed immunotherapy combinations," he said. 6. Targets Cancer Stem Cells: Ivermectin preferentially targets cancer stem cells, which are a driver of cancer tumors and relapses. By focusing on these cells, ivermectin attacks the root of cancer's resilience and ability to recur. 7. The Curious Case of Rick Alderson: Mr. Alderson, a retired sawmill worker, “was a dead man walking” and given 6 months to live after his terminal colon cancer had metastasized and spread to his liver, where it had formed 25 distinct tumors. After starting ivermectin, Rick Alderson's carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, which are markers for tumor activity, dropped significantly from 1,498 ng/mL to 13.9 ng/mL in a matter of months. Of the 25 tumors in Mr. Alderson's liver, only three remained after his treatment with ivermectin and chemotherapy, indicating a substantial reduction in tumor burden. Mr. Alderson lived for two more years beyond his initial six-month prognosis, which his wife attributes to the use of ivermectin alongside chemotherapy.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

532,851 views • 2 years ago