Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 DAY THREE IS WHEN GOVERNMENTS START TO WORRY A protest can be dismissed as a one-off. A second day can be described as an isolated reaction. But when demonstrations continue into a third day and beyond, something changes. The story stops being about the original incident. It becomes... a test of public sentiment. A test of political authority. And a test of whether those in power still understand the mood of the country. The real concern for governments is not the number of people on the streets today. It is the possibility that the anger driving them there is spreading faster than the authorities can contain politically. Because if the protests continue, the question is no longer: "Why are people protesting?" The question becomes: "Why are so many people still protesting?" That is when a local crisis can become a national one.show more

Jim Ferguson

445,562 subscribers

40,748 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 THE CLOCK IS TICKING Governments can contain a riot. They can deploy police. They can make arrests. What becomes far harder to contain is a growing belief among millions of people that nobody in power is listening. From Belfast to Glasgow and beyond, the question is no longer whether there is public anger. The question is how much further it spreads. If the unrest fades, the government will claim victory. If it continues to grow, this stops being a law-and-order issue and becomes a crisis of political legitimacy. History shows that when governments lose the trust of the people, events can move very quickly. The next few days may prove decisive.

🚨 THE CLOCK IS TICKING Governments can contain a riot. They can deploy police. They can make arrests. What becomes far harder to contain is a growing belief among millions of people that nobody in power is listening. From Belfast to Glasgow and beyond, the question is no longer whether there is public anger. The question is how much further it spreads. If the unrest fades, the government will claim victory. If it continues to grow, this stops being a law-and-order issue and becomes a crisis of political legitimacy. History shows that when governments lose the trust of the people, events can move very quickly. The next few days may prove decisive.

Jim Ferguson

187,329 views • 3 months ago

🚨 A MOMENT OF TRUTH IS APPROACHING Belfast was the spark. Now the unrest is spreading. The political establishment still speaks as if nothing fundamental has changed, yet anger is spilling onto the streets in city after city. The question is no longer whether people are angry. The question is whether those in power understand just how angry they are. History shows that when governments stop listening, events can move far faster than anyone expects. The clock is ticking.

🚨 A MOMENT OF TRUTH IS APPROACHING Belfast was the spark. Now the unrest is spreading. The political establishment still speaks as if nothing fundamental has changed, yet anger is spilling onto the streets in city after city. The question is no longer whether people are angry. The question is whether those in power understand just how angry they are. History shows that when governments stop listening, events can move far faster than anyone expects. The clock is ticking.

Jim Ferguson

46,719 views • 3 months ago

🚨 WHAT HAPPENS IF EVERY CITY FOLLOWS? "Save our kids." That was the message coming from the streets of Liverpool. What should concern the political establishment is not the protest itself. It is the possibility that similar scenes begin appearing across Britain. Liverpool today. Glasgow tomorrow. The North East next week. For years, millions of people have raised concerns about immigration, crime, community cohesion and the future direction of the country. Many feel they were ignored. Others believe they were insulted, dismissed or branded extremists for daring to speak out. Now those concerns are moving beyond social media and into public demonstrations. The political class keeps hoping these are isolated incidents. But what if they are not? What if Liverpool is not the exception, but part of a much larger shift in public mood? Because once people begin taking to the streets in city after city, the question is no longer whether frustration exists. The question is how long politicians can continue pretending it doesn't.

🚨 WHAT HAPPENS IF EVERY CITY FOLLOWS? "Save our kids." That was the message coming from the streets of Liverpool. What should concern the political establishment is not the protest itself. It is the possibility that similar scenes begin appearing across Britain. Liverpool today. Glasgow tomorrow. The North East next week. For years, millions of people have raised concerns about immigration, crime, community cohesion and the future direction of the country. Many feel they were ignored. Others believe they were insulted, dismissed or branded extremists for daring to speak out. Now those concerns are moving beyond social media and into public demonstrations. The political class keeps hoping these are isolated incidents. But what if they are not? What if Liverpool is not the exception, but part of a much larger shift in public mood? Because once people begin taking to the streets in city after city, the question is no longer whether frustration exists. The question is how long politicians can continue pretending it doesn't.

Jim Ferguson

11,215 views • 3 months ago

In 2002, Kenyans stood up and declared that the era of President Daniel arap Moi had come to an end. The political establishment was powerful, the state machinery was intact, but the people were stronger. The people won. In 2027, Kenya faces another defining moment. This is not about politicians. It is not about tribes. It is not about personalities. It is about the sovereign will of the people. When citizens unite behind a common cause, no amount of power, money, propaganda, or intimidation can stand in their way. Governments derive their authority from the people, and when the people decide it is time for change, change becomes inevitable. 2002 was a Moi Must Go moment. 2027 will be remembered as a moment when Kenyans once again demonstrated that ultimate power belongs to the people. The people are supreme. The people are the employers. The people are the final authority. And when the people speak with one voice, history listens.

In 2002, Kenyans stood up and declared that the era of President Daniel arap Moi had come to an end. The political establishment was powerful, the state machinery was intact, but the people were stronger. The people won. In 2027, Kenya faces another defining moment. This is not about politicians. It is not about tribes. It is not about personalities. It is about the sovereign will of the people. When citizens unite behind a common cause, no amount of power, money, propaganda, or intimidation can stand in their way. Governments derive their authority from the people, and when the people decide it is time for change, change becomes inevitable. 2002 was a Moi Must Go moment. 2027 will be remembered as a moment when Kenyans once again demonstrated that ultimate power belongs to the people. The people are supreme. The people are the employers. The people are the final authority. And when the people speak with one voice, history listens.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇. 𝐎. 𝐍𝐄𝐊𝐎

24,317 views • 3 months ago

🚨 THEY CAN'T CONTROL THE BORDERS. BUT THEY CAN CONTROL YOU. The government cannot stop the boats. Cannot stop the hotels filling up. Cannot stop the public anger. Cannot stop the protests spreading from city to city. But it can ban social media. Interesting. Because when governments begin losing control of events, they often become increasingly interested in controlling information. Millions of people are worried about immigration. Worried about crime. Worried about the future of the country. Yet instead of addressing the concerns driving that anger, the political class appears increasingly focused on regulating what people can see, hear and say online. The public is beginning to ask a simple question: Why is controlling access to information suddenly more urgent than controlling Britain's borders? That question is not going away. In fact, it is getting louder by the day.

🚨 THEY CAN'T CONTROL THE BORDERS. BUT THEY CAN CONTROL YOU. The government cannot stop the boats. Cannot stop the hotels filling up. Cannot stop the public anger. Cannot stop the protests spreading from city to city. But it can ban social media. Interesting. Because when governments begin losing control of events, they often become increasingly interested in controlling information. Millions of people are worried about immigration. Worried about crime. Worried about the future of the country. Yet instead of addressing the concerns driving that anger, the political class appears increasingly focused on regulating what people can see, hear and say online. The public is beginning to ask a simple question: Why is controlling access to information suddenly more urgent than controlling Britain's borders? That question is not going away. In fact, it is getting louder by the day.

Jim Ferguson

242,578 views • 3 months ago

There are moments when the Senate reveals what it really is. This is one of those moments. The SAVE America Act is more than a vote. It is a test of whether the Senate still intends to govern. That's why I was proud to file the completed version of the SAVE America Act today.

There are moments when the Senate reveals what it really is. This is one of those moments. The SAVE America Act is more than a vote. It is a test of whether the Senate still intends to govern. That's why I was proud to file the completed version of the SAVE America Act today.

Senator Eric Schmitt

54,999 views • 6 months ago

There is no way that ethnic tensions could be as pronounced as they currently are without a lot of deep sin going into the generation of those tensions. But ethnic tensions are not the result of a white person waking up one day and thinking he needs to start despising people who are darker than he is. Neither is it the result of black people suddenly lurching into a policy of violence and mayhem. There are two errors to avoid when it comes to the kind of repentance that is needed in an hour like ours. One is to approach the whole thing in a simplistic spirit, calling for people to repent of all their behavior, but only starting at the precise moment the rioting started. But repentance is also needed for all the decisions and policies that led to the conditions that made the rioting seem like a reasonable way out. It isn’t, but why do people come to believe that? The second mistake is that of starting at the wrong end—this happens when we start by confessing the sins of the other guy. That gets us nowhere, and just perpetuates the conflict. You can confess other people’s sins all day long and your joy will not come back.

There is no way that ethnic tensions could be as pronounced as they currently are without a lot of deep sin going into the generation of those tensions. But ethnic tensions are not the result of a white person waking up one day and thinking he needs to start despising people who are darker than he is. Neither is it the result of black people suddenly lurching into a policy of violence and mayhem. There are two errors to avoid when it comes to the kind of repentance that is needed in an hour like ours. One is to approach the whole thing in a simplistic spirit, calling for people to repent of all their behavior, but only starting at the precise moment the rioting started. But repentance is also needed for all the decisions and policies that led to the conditions that made the rioting seem like a reasonable way out. It isn’t, but why do people come to believe that? The second mistake is that of starting at the wrong end—this happens when we start by confessing the sins of the other guy. That gets us nowhere, and just perpetuates the conflict. You can confess other people’s sins all day long and your joy will not come back.

Douglas Wilson

73,863 views • 11 months ago

What Zohran’s campaign is about, and why it is so important that he wins, is that it is a test case of whether the billionaires completely control the political process or whether democracy can still prevail. This is a fight we must not lose.

What Zohran’s campaign is about, and why it is so important that he wins, is that it is a test case of whether the billionaires completely control the political process or whether democracy can still prevail. This is a fight we must not lose.

Bernie Sanders

358,441 views • 1 year ago

"Courage is far shorter in supply than genius." - Peter Thiel "One of the challenges in writing a book about entrepreneurship or teaching a class on this is that there is sort of no formula. And I think science always starts with a number two. It starts with experiments you can repeat, things you can do over and over again. But there's sort of a sense in which every moment in the history of business, every moment in the history of technology happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg will not be starting a social networking company. The next Larry Page will not start a search engine. The next Bill Gates will not be starting an operating system. And so if you are trying to copy these people, you're in some sense not learning from them. And so I think one of the really big challenges in teaching or writing about entrepreneurship is what can you say about being an entrepreneur at all when the key thing is always to do something new, different, that's not precisely been done before. And so the point of departure I start with in Zero to One is a somewhat indirect approach by asking a series of contrarian questions. The business question is, what great company is nobody starting? The more intellectual version of this question is, tell me something true that very few people agree with you on. And this is a fantastic interview question. It turns out to be quite a hard question, even when people can read on the internet that you ask of everybody who comes in the door, it still is a hard question. It's one of those unusual questions where if you know it's on the test, it's still hard. And it's hard not just because we sort of think that new things require brilliance or something like that, but because it's socially difficult. If I ask you that question, if you tell me something like the education system is screwed up or our political system doesn't work very well, those are true answers, but they're not actually good answers because all of us already know them to be true. The good answers are ones that are somehow uncomfortable that the person interviewing you does not actually want to hear. And I think we live in this world where courage is in far shorter supply than genius. And so it is sort of this, it is in a sense this problem of political correctness properly understood, is this very deep, very, very broad sort of a problem."

"Courage is far shorter in supply than genius." - Peter Thiel "One of the challenges in writing a book about entrepreneurship or teaching a class on this is that there is sort of no formula. And I think science always starts with a number two. It starts with experiments you can repeat, things you can do over and over again. But there's sort of a sense in which every moment in the history of business, every moment in the history of technology happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg will not be starting a social networking company. The next Larry Page will not start a search engine. The next Bill Gates will not be starting an operating system. And so if you are trying to copy these people, you're in some sense not learning from them. And so I think one of the really big challenges in teaching or writing about entrepreneurship is what can you say about being an entrepreneur at all when the key thing is always to do something new, different, that's not precisely been done before. And so the point of departure I start with in Zero to One is a somewhat indirect approach by asking a series of contrarian questions. The business question is, what great company is nobody starting? The more intellectual version of this question is, tell me something true that very few people agree with you on. And this is a fantastic interview question. It turns out to be quite a hard question, even when people can read on the internet that you ask of everybody who comes in the door, it still is a hard question. It's one of those unusual questions where if you know it's on the test, it's still hard. And it's hard not just because we sort of think that new things require brilliance or something like that, but because it's socially difficult. If I ask you that question, if you tell me something like the education system is screwed up or our political system doesn't work very well, those are true answers, but they're not actually good answers because all of us already know them to be true. The good answers are ones that are somehow uncomfortable that the person interviewing you does not actually want to hear. And I think we live in this world where courage is in far shorter supply than genius. And so it is sort of this, it is in a sense this problem of political correctness properly understood, is this very deep, very, very broad sort of a problem."

Founder Mode

12,339 views • 7 months ago

Russian-speaking [Ukrainians] are a disease that must be eradicated,” says children’s writer (!) Larysa Nitsoi in the media. And apparently no one sees a problem. No one stops her. No one holds her criminally accountable for hate speech, for inciting hostility, or for rhetoric that can be read as a call for violence against the “wrong kind” of Ukrainians. This is what contemporary fascistic Ukraine looks like: a country where millions of its own citizens can be branded by representatives of the post-Maidan intelligentsia as a “disease” to be “treated” or “eradicated” because they speak the "wrong" language. When human beings are described as a contagion, when an entire linguistic community is pathologized and presented as something the national body must be cleansed of, we are no longer talking about an innocent “language debate.” This is the vocabulary of dehumanization. It is the logic of eugenics. It is the rhetoric historically associated with fascism and Nazism. And all of this is unfolding in a state politically, financially, and militarily backed by the West.

Russian-speaking [Ukrainians] are a disease that must be eradicated,” says children’s writer (!) Larysa Nitsoi in the media. And apparently no one sees a problem. No one stops her. No one holds her criminally accountable for hate speech, for inciting hostility, or for rhetoric that can be read as a call for violence against the “wrong kind” of Ukrainians. This is what contemporary fascistic Ukraine looks like: a country where millions of its own citizens can be branded by representatives of the post-Maidan intelligentsia as a “disease” to be “treated” or “eradicated” because they speak the "wrong" language. When human beings are described as a contagion, when an entire linguistic community is pathologized and presented as something the national body must be cleansed of, we are no longer talking about an innocent “language debate.” This is the vocabulary of dehumanization. It is the logic of eugenics. It is the rhetoric historically associated with fascism and Nazism. And all of this is unfolding in a state politically, financially, and militarily backed by the West.

Marta Havryshko

69,949 views • 13 days ago

🚨 IDAHO WAS THE WEATHER WARFARE TEST RUN — AND PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO PANIC Something isn't adding up. The world is burning. Record heat. Historic wildfires. Floods that seem to come out of nowhere. Entire regions running out of water. Weather patterns that many people swear aren't behaving naturally anymore. And right in the middle of it all, scientists, governments, and powerful institutions are suddenly talking openly about modifying the weather. For years, anyone who brought up weather modification was laughed out of the room. Now the conversation isn't happening in the shadows. It's happening in public. Not whether it can be done. Whether it should be done. Then Idaho happened. The footage spread everywhere. And for a lot of people, it felt less like a weather event and more like a glimpse behind the curtain. Because once humanity gains the ability to influence the atmosphere, everything changes. Who decides where the rain falls? Who decides which regions get relief? Who decides which regions suffer drought? Who decides when a storm is a disaster... and when it's a tool? Some people believe the public is being slowly conditioned to accept something that would have sounded insane just a few years ago. The industrialization of the sky. The ability to engineer the environment itself. Food can be controlled. Energy can be controlled. Water can be controlled. And if the weather can be controlled too... what exactly is left beyond their reach? That's why some people don't believe Idaho was the story. They believe Idaho was the demonstration. The moment the public accidentally saw something they weren't supposed to see. The moment a "conspiracy theory" stopped sounding so crazy. Was Idaho a freak weather event... or the first public glimpse of a future where the weather is no longer controlled by nature?

🚨 IDAHO WAS THE WEATHER WARFARE TEST RUN — AND PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO PANIC Something isn't adding up. The world is burning. Record heat. Historic wildfires. Floods that seem to come out of nowhere. Entire regions running out of water. Weather patterns that many people swear aren't behaving naturally anymore. And right in the middle of it all, scientists, governments, and powerful institutions are suddenly talking openly about modifying the weather. For years, anyone who brought up weather modification was laughed out of the room. Now the conversation isn't happening in the shadows. It's happening in public. Not whether it can be done. Whether it should be done. Then Idaho happened. The footage spread everywhere. And for a lot of people, it felt less like a weather event and more like a glimpse behind the curtain. Because once humanity gains the ability to influence the atmosphere, everything changes. Who decides where the rain falls? Who decides which regions get relief? Who decides which regions suffer drought? Who decides when a storm is a disaster... and when it's a tool? Some people believe the public is being slowly conditioned to accept something that would have sounded insane just a few years ago. The industrialization of the sky. The ability to engineer the environment itself. Food can be controlled. Energy can be controlled. Water can be controlled. And if the weather can be controlled too... what exactly is left beyond their reach? That's why some people don't believe Idaho was the story. They believe Idaho was the demonstration. The moment the public accidentally saw something they weren't supposed to see. The moment a "conspiracy theory" stopped sounding so crazy. Was Idaho a freak weather event... or the first public glimpse of a future where the weather is no longer controlled by nature?

HustleBitch

20,299 views • 2 months ago

Elon Musk: Unfettered mass immigration will lead to the destruction of any country that allows it. “At the end of the day, it is a numbers game, a number situation. If there are 8 billion people in the world and let's say you're a country of, you know, 50 million, 60 million for a medium-sized country, but even for a country like the United States, which is 350 million, given that there are 8 billion people in the world, it only takes a few percent of the rest of the world to move to the country to where it is no longer that country. A country is not its geography. A country is its people. This is a fundamental concept that should be obvious. And if you took the people of Italy and you teleported the people of Italy to, say, some part of the United States, it would still be Italy. But if you teleported a bunch of people from some other part of the world to Italy, where the Italian people no longer be because they've been teleported to America, then the geographic region would no longer be Italy. It would be that other country. A country is its people, not its geography.” Source: Elon Musk at Lega Congress, April 5, 2025

Elon Musk: Unfettered mass immigration will lead to the destruction of any country that allows it. “At the end of the day, it is a numbers game, a number situation. If there are 8 billion people in the world and let's say you're a country of, you know, 50 million, 60 million for a medium-sized country, but even for a country like the United States, which is 350 million, given that there are 8 billion people in the world, it only takes a few percent of the rest of the world to move to the country to where it is no longer that country. A country is not its geography. A country is its people. This is a fundamental concept that should be obvious. And if you took the people of Italy and you teleported the people of Italy to, say, some part of the United States, it would still be Italy. But if you teleported a bunch of people from some other part of the world to Italy, where the Italian people no longer be because they've been teleported to America, then the geographic region would no longer be Italy. It would be that other country. A country is its people, not its geography.” Source: Elon Musk at Lega Congress, April 5, 2025

ELON CLIPS

34,707 views • 3 months ago

There is a reason the fight over the audit law has dragged on for over a year, despite being approved by 72% of voters. The original ballot question was clear and it passed overwhelmingly. Massachusetts voters did not ask for a negotiated audit, a limited review, or for the Legislature to define its own terms. The people approved an independent audit of the Legislature. Now, the response from Beacon Hill is a bill that: • Narrows the scope of what can be examined • Allows the Legislature to decide what records will be provided • Prevents courts from stepping in when disputes arise Who has ever heard of an independent audit where the entity being audited gets to decide what can be investigated? At the same time, lawmakers are presenting this as a “transparency package.” But even they acknowledge that many of the “new” public records provisions simply codify documents that are already available today. So what is actually changing? The audit. And that is exactly where the restrictions are being added. As Auditor Diana DiZoglio warns in this clip, this is not an expansion of transparency. It is a restructuring of a voter mandate into something Beacon Hill can define, limit, and control. For the people of our state, the core question is straightforward: Should the Legislature be able to redefine a law that 72% of voters already passed when it becomes inconvenient?

There is a reason the fight over the audit law has dragged on for over a year, despite being approved by 72% of voters. The original ballot question was clear and it passed overwhelmingly. Massachusetts voters did not ask for a negotiated audit, a limited review, or for the Legislature to define its own terms. The people approved an independent audit of the Legislature. Now, the response from Beacon Hill is a bill that: • Narrows the scope of what can be examined • Allows the Legislature to decide what records will be provided • Prevents courts from stepping in when disputes arise Who has ever heard of an independent audit where the entity being audited gets to decide what can be investigated? At the same time, lawmakers are presenting this as a “transparency package.” But even they acknowledge that many of the “new” public records provisions simply codify documents that are already available today. So what is actually changing? The audit. And that is exactly where the restrictions are being added. As Auditor Diana DiZoglio warns in this clip, this is not an expansion of transparency. It is a restructuring of a voter mandate into something Beacon Hill can define, limit, and control. For the people of our state, the core question is straightforward: Should the Legislature be able to redefine a law that 72% of voters already passed when it becomes inconvenient?

Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance

11,888 views • 3 months ago

Explained to Al Jazeera English that oil inventories are much lower than they were when the war started in February. As a result, the runway until an oil crisis becomes really damaging is much shorter. So while the US can degrade Iran's ability to strike ships, the real question is if it can do so before the oil crisis becomes a political disaster for Trump.

Explained to Al Jazeera English that oil inventories are much lower than they were when the war started in February. As a result, the runway until an oil crisis becomes really damaging is much shorter. So while the US can degrade Iran's ability to strike ships, the real question is if it can do so before the oil crisis becomes a political disaster for Trump.

Trita Parsi

65,343 views • 2 months ago

🚨 IRAN STANDS ON THE EDGE OF HISTORY Millions of Iranians are in the streets, defying an Islamic dictatorship that has ruled through fear, prisons, and bullets. Reports now point to thousands of civilians killed as the regime desperately tries to hold onto power. President Trump has just confirmed the U.S. is watching this minute-by-minute, with the military assessing “very strong options” as protesters are shot, trampled, and silenced by force. This is not a normal protest cycle. This is a nation trying to break free. When a regime starts killing its own people in the open, it is no longer governing — it is collapsing. The only question left is how long it can keep pretending otherwise. If the Iranian people succeed, it will be one of the most significant political shifts of the 21st century: the fall of a theocratic police state and the return of a nation to its people. The world is holding its breath.

🚨 IRAN STANDS ON THE EDGE OF HISTORY Millions of Iranians are in the streets, defying an Islamic dictatorship that has ruled through fear, prisons, and bullets. Reports now point to thousands of civilians killed as the regime desperately tries to hold onto power. President Trump has just confirmed the U.S. is watching this minute-by-minute, with the military assessing “very strong options” as protesters are shot, trampled, and silenced by force. This is not a normal protest cycle. This is a nation trying to break free. When a regime starts killing its own people in the open, it is no longer governing — it is collapsing. The only question left is how long it can keep pretending otherwise. If the Iranian people succeed, it will be one of the most significant political shifts of the 21st century: the fall of a theocratic police state and the return of a nation to its people. The world is holding its breath.

Jim Ferguson

14,430 views • 8 months ago

The situation in Iran is incredibly volatile as protests continue for the 11th day. This could be a pivotal year for the people of Iran. These situations are often surprises and can be thwarted, but this could be the year.

The situation in Iran is incredibly volatile as protests continue for the 11th day. This could be a pivotal year for the people of Iran. These situations are often surprises and can be thwarted, but this could be the year.

Rudy W. Giuliani

35,646 views • 8 months ago

Sanders: There is a reason why Trump attacks Europe every day. They have democratic governments. And there is a reason that Trump welcomes the dictator from Saudi Arabia… Trump loves those people because you can make a deal with them. You don’t have to worry about the people getting in the way.

Sanders: There is a reason why Trump attacks Europe every day. They have democratic governments. And there is a reason that Trump welcomes the dictator from Saudi Arabia… Trump loves those people because you can make a deal with them. You don’t have to worry about the people getting in the way.

Acyn

86,602 views • 7 months ago

MR. TATE IS RIGHT‼️ The level of incompetence of the so-called leders in Denmark is extreme! So maybe they didn't shoot down the drones and started an investigation because it would reveal that the drones were not from their favorite man to hate? Without an investigation they can continue the betray on the Danish people and the lies of a threat "from outside" can continue, so the Danish people don't see that the real threat is "from inside"! Hopefully, the Danish people will soon become aware that the leader of The Red Regime is teasing a sleeping lion and one day it will attack because it has had enough of the annoying stupid little girl who consistently does not understand that you do not teasing a sleeping lion! Thank you Andrew Tate!

MR. TATE IS RIGHT‼️ The level of incompetence of the so-called leders in Denmark is extreme! So maybe they didn't shoot down the drones and started an investigation because it would reveal that the drones were not from their favorite man to hate? Without an investigation they can continue the betray on the Danish people and the lies of a threat "from outside" can continue, so the Danish people don't see that the real threat is "from inside"! Hopefully, the Danish people will soon become aware that the leader of The Red Regime is teasing a sleeping lion and one day it will attack because it has had enough of the annoying stupid little girl who consistently does not understand that you do not teasing a sleeping lion! Thank you Andrew Tate!

Malue Montclairre

36,974 views • 1 year ago