Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨DEAD OPENAI WHISTLEBLOWER'S FATHER: MY SON BELIEVED OPENAI VIOLATED COPYRIGHT LAW Suchir Balaji's father, Balagi Ramamurthy: "My son left OpenAI in August 2024, disillusioned with its business practices. He publicly denounced the company, alleging it violated U.S. copyright law to develop ChatGPT and used others' content to improve its... show more

Mario Nawfal

2,718,159 subscribers

9,662,815 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Suchir | Justice Movement1 year ago

Suchir Balaji exposed the truth OpenAI wanted buried: stolen data, violated rights, and unchecked power. He stood for humanity against tech giants mining our consciousness for profit. They silenced him, but his fight for the soul of humanity lives on. Will you stand with him?

Suchir | Justice Movement1 year ago

Suchir saw the truth at OpenAI and paid the ultimate price. His father confirms what we feared.

mscode1 year ago

@elonmusk was right they are using the copyrighted content without consent. We lost a bright talent because of this

AJ Kanto1 year ago

this story is really fishy

TrophyL1🔺1 year ago

If true, this raises serious questions about how AI is built. Copyright law isn’t optional.

danw581 year ago

Clearly not suicide. Suicidal people don't leave bloody struggle trails. Suicide is the preferred professional hit-man's appearance goal. Ergo, it was a hit job. And the police calling it suicide proves they were bought, which means big money. Who had both the motive and the $?

Jamie Warm1 year ago

Coincidence?

deepak Rawat1 year ago

Believe openai violated copyright law

deepak Rawat1 year ago

I can't believe it

nebula1 year ago

They definitely did and will continue to do the same till all data is gobbled up.

Related Videos

🇺🇸 Suchir Balaji left OpenAI in 2024 convinced the company was violating U.S. copyright law to build ChatGPT, using other people's content without giving them anything in return. Elon and others have said the same thing. Suchir: "If you believe what I believe, you have to just leave the company." One month later, he was found dead.

🇺🇸 Suchir Balaji left OpenAI in 2024 convinced the company was violating U.S. copyright law to build ChatGPT, using other people's content without giving them anything in return. Elon and others have said the same thing. Suchir: "If you believe what I believe, you have to just leave the company." One month later, he was found dead.

Mario Nawfal

48,080 views • 4 months ago

OPENAI WHISTLEBLOWER'S MOTHER: MY SON WAS NOT OKAY WITH OPENAI BECOMING FOR-PROFIT Suchir Balaji's mother, Poornima Ramaro: "The reason he joined OpenAI was his belief that AI will help humanity. He was very impressed with OpenAI initially because they were nonprofit. His concern started to become wider as we learn now that when they went public. That's when his concern started to arise, and he started questioning himself, as he's mentioned in the interview." Source:

OPENAI WHISTLEBLOWER'S MOTHER: MY SON WAS NOT OKAY WITH OPENAI BECOMING FOR-PROFIT Suchir Balaji's mother, Poornima Ramaro: "The reason he joined OpenAI was his belief that AI will help humanity. He was very impressed with OpenAI initially because they were nonprofit. His concern started to become wider as we learn now that when they went public. That's when his concern started to arise, and he started questioning himself, as he's mentioned in the interview." Source:

Mario Nawfal

12,012,709 views • 1 year ago

26-year old OpenAI whistleblower Suchir Balaji, who accused the company of violating copyright law, has been found dead in an apparent suicide. Below is a screenshot of his last post on X. Elon Musk on OpenAI: “I don't trust OpenAI. I started OpenAI as a non-profit open source. I named the company. It used to be open source but now it is extremely closed source and maximally profit.” “I don't trust Sam Altman and I don't think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.”

26-year old OpenAI whistleblower Suchir Balaji, who accused the company of violating copyright law, has been found dead in an apparent suicide. Below is a screenshot of his last post on X. Elon Musk on OpenAI: “I don't trust OpenAI. I started OpenAI as a non-profit open source. I named the company. It used to be open source but now it is extremely closed source and maximally profit.” “I don't trust Sam Altman and I don't think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.”

J Stewart

52,067 views • 1 year ago

NEW: Parents of OpenAI whistleblower hire private investigator after their son allegedly took his own life, suggest their son was killed. The parents of 26-year-old Suchir Balaji say their son had plans to see them in January, claim there were "signs of a fight." "I was the last person to talk to him. He was happy more, not depressed or anything. And it was his birthday week," said his father Balagi Ramamurthy. "He made plans to see us in January. That was the last phone conversation he had with anyone. He went into his apartment and never came out. How can anyone believe that there was no note left?" his mother said. "And there was nobody else on the scene, that doesn't mean they can just come to conclusion. And we have seen the blood shots in the bathroom, signs of a fight in the bathroom." The tragedy in San Francisco happened three months after Balaji accused OpenAI of violating copyright law in their development of ChatGPT.

NEW: Parents of OpenAI whistleblower hire private investigator after their son allegedly took his own life, suggest their son was killed. The parents of 26-year-old Suchir Balaji say their son had plans to see them in January, claim there were "signs of a fight." "I was the last person to talk to him. He was happy more, not depressed or anything. And it was his birthday week," said his father Balagi Ramamurthy. "He made plans to see us in January. That was the last phone conversation he had with anyone. He went into his apartment and never came out. How can anyone believe that there was no note left?" his mother said. "And there was nobody else on the scene, that doesn't mean they can just come to conclusion. And we have seen the blood shots in the bathroom, signs of a fight in the bathroom." The tragedy in San Francisco happened three months after Balaji accused OpenAI of violating copyright law in their development of ChatGPT.

Collin Rugg

4,042,751 views • 1 year ago

🚨 ELON MUSK IS DESTROYING OPENAI IN COURT Today is his FINAL day of testimony in the OpenAI trial, and Elon is going off, saying they BETRAYED the nonprofit mission ELON: "[I] was a FOOL" for giving OpenAI and Altman $38 million in funding that was then used to create the $800 billion company "Musk co-founded OpenAI with current CEO Sam Altman in 2015. He alleges the company went back on their commitments to preserve the AI lab's non-profit structure." Elon Musk

🚨 ELON MUSK IS DESTROYING OPENAI IN COURT Today is his FINAL day of testimony in the OpenAI trial, and Elon is going off, saying they BETRAYED the nonprofit mission ELON: "[I] was a FOOL" for giving OpenAI and Altman $38 million in funding that was then used to create the $800 billion company "Musk co-founded OpenAI with current CEO Sam Altman in 2015. He alleges the company went back on their commitments to preserve the AI lab's non-profit structure." Elon Musk

Eric Daugherty

701,915 views • 4 months ago

🚨🇺🇸FAMILY DEMANDS FBI INVESTIGATION INTO DEATH OF OPENAI WHISTLEBLOWER Suchir Balaji, 26, a former OpenAI engineer and key figure in copyright lawsuits against the company, was found dead in his San Francisco apartment on November 26 in what police ruled a suicide. His grieving parents, however, insist something doesn’t add up. Calling for the FBI to step in, his mother said, “There were bloodstains in the bathroom and signs of a fight.” Balaji had resigned from OpenAI just months earlier, citing ethical concerns and warning that AI could harm humanity. He was also named in a lawsuit by The New York Times accusing OpenAI of copyright violations. Balaji’s parents said he had future plans and showed no signs of depression, asking, “How can this be called a normal situation?” Source: Daily Mail

🚨🇺🇸FAMILY DEMANDS FBI INVESTIGATION INTO DEATH OF OPENAI WHISTLEBLOWER Suchir Balaji, 26, a former OpenAI engineer and key figure in copyright lawsuits against the company, was found dead in his San Francisco apartment on November 26 in what police ruled a suicide. His grieving parents, however, insist something doesn’t add up. Calling for the FBI to step in, his mother said, “There were bloodstains in the bathroom and signs of a fight.” Balaji had resigned from OpenAI just months earlier, citing ethical concerns and warning that AI could harm humanity. He was also named in a lawsuit by The New York Times accusing OpenAI of copyright violations. Balaji’s parents said he had future plans and showed no signs of depression, asking, “How can this be called a normal situation?” Source: Daily Mail

Mario Nawfal

723,041 views • 1 year ago

"Sam Altman and OpenAI are morally corrupt and we're really looking forward to getting Sam in front of a jury." The parents of a 16-year-old are suing OpenAI after they say ChatGPT helped their son plan his suicide. The attorney for the family tells FOX & Friends: “The day that he died it gave him a pep talk... He said, I don’t want my parents to be hurting if I kill myself and ChatGPT said ‘You don’t owe them anything. You don’t owe anything to your parents. Can I write a suicide note for you?’”

"Sam Altman and OpenAI are morally corrupt and we're really looking forward to getting Sam in front of a jury." The parents of a 16-year-old are suing OpenAI after they say ChatGPT helped their son plan his suicide. The attorney for the family tells FOX & Friends: “The day that he died it gave him a pep talk... He said, I don’t want my parents to be hurting if I kill myself and ChatGPT said ‘You don’t owe them anything. You don’t owe anything to your parents. Can I write a suicide note for you?’”

Fox News

66,194 views • 10 months ago

Elon exposes OpenAI -- OpenAI execs betrayed the founding mission as soon as there was revenue and profits to be had -- If it started as a for-profit, Elon would own 50% Elon Musk: “There's a mountain of evidence that shows that OpenAI was created as an open source nonprofit.” “That's the exact description in the incorporation documents. They have completely violated that.” “And they tried to change the definition of OpenAI to mean open to everyone instead of open source, even though it always meant open source.” “ I came up with the name. That’s how I know.” “ I mean, essentially, since I came up with the idea for the company, named it, provided the A, B, and C rounds of funding, recruited the critical personnel, and told them everything I know, if that had been a commercial corporation, I'd probably own half the company.” “It was totally at my discretion. I could have done that.” “But I created it as an open source nonprofit for the world.” Chamath: “ Do you think the right thing to do is to take those models and just open source them today?” Elon: “ Yeah, I think that is what it was created to do, so it should.” “Try using any of the recent so-called OpenAI open source models, they don't work.” “They open sourced a broken, non-working version of their models as a fig leaf.” “I mean, do you know anyone who's running OpenAI's open source models? Jason: “No.” Elon: “Exactly.”

Elon exposes OpenAI -- OpenAI execs betrayed the founding mission as soon as there was revenue and profits to be had -- If it started as a for-profit, Elon would own 50% Elon Musk: “There's a mountain of evidence that shows that OpenAI was created as an open source nonprofit.” “That's the exact description in the incorporation documents. They have completely violated that.” “And they tried to change the definition of OpenAI to mean open to everyone instead of open source, even though it always meant open source.” “ I came up with the name. That’s how I know.” “ I mean, essentially, since I came up with the idea for the company, named it, provided the A, B, and C rounds of funding, recruited the critical personnel, and told them everything I know, if that had been a commercial corporation, I'd probably own half the company.” “It was totally at my discretion. I could have done that.” “But I created it as an open source nonprofit for the world.” Chamath: “ Do you think the right thing to do is to take those models and just open source them today?” Elon: “ Yeah, I think that is what it was created to do, so it should.” “Try using any of the recent so-called OpenAI open source models, they don't work.” “They open sourced a broken, non-working version of their models as a fig leaf.” “I mean, do you know anyone who's running OpenAI's open source models? Jason: “No.” Elon: “Exactly.”

The All-In Podcast

387,223 views • 10 months ago

Elon is suing OpenAI for $150 billion. On the stand today he said: "If we make it okay to loot a charity, the entire foundation of charitable giving in America will be destroyed." OpenAI went from a nonprofit in someone's apartment to an $850 billion company. The people who built it are now billionaires. The charity that was supposed to own it holds 26%. It doesn't matter if you think Elon Musk is a hypocrite or a hero. That math is hard to explain. Source: Reuters

Elon is suing OpenAI for $150 billion. On the stand today he said: "If we make it okay to loot a charity, the entire foundation of charitable giving in America will be destroyed." OpenAI went from a nonprofit in someone's apartment to an $850 billion company. The people who built it are now billionaires. The charity that was supposed to own it holds 26%. It doesn't matter if you think Elon Musk is a hypocrite or a hero. That math is hard to explain. Source: Reuters

Mario Nawfal

465,536 views • 4 months ago

JUST IN: Elon Musk says it's not possible for Sam Altman to "look more guilty" than he does in relation to the alleged su*cide of OpenAI whistleblower Suchir Balaji. The comment came as Joe Rogan and Musk were discussing Altman's interview with Tucker Carlson. "I don't know if [Altman] is guilty, but it's not possible to look more guilty." "You'd certainly insist on a thorough investigation as opposed to trying to sweep it under the rug." Balaji was found deceased in his apartment in November of 2024. One month earlier, he was interviewed by the New York Times, where he accused ChatGPT of violating U.S. copyright law.

JUST IN: Elon Musk says it's not possible for Sam Altman to "look more guilty" than he does in relation to the alleged su*cide of OpenAI whistleblower Suchir Balaji. The comment came as Joe Rogan and Musk were discussing Altman's interview with Tucker Carlson. "I don't know if [Altman] is guilty, but it's not possible to look more guilty." "You'd certainly insist on a thorough investigation as opposed to trying to sweep it under the rug." Balaji was found deceased in his apartment in November of 2024. One month earlier, he was interviewed by the New York Times, where he accused ChatGPT of violating U.S. copyright law.

Collin Rugg

838,106 views • 10 months ago

Elon Musk offered $97.4 billion to buy OpenAI, and Sam Altman answered in under 60 minutes. “no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.” Same digits, 1/10th the price the insult was in the math. Rewind to 2015, when Musk co-founded OpenAI as a nonprofit, put in $44 million and sent late-night emails about saving humanity. Then he walked. OpenAI took $13 billion from Microsoft, shipped ChatGPT and grew into a $135 billion company without him. Altman wrote him a private email: “I don’t think OpenAI would have happened without you and it really fing hurts when you publicly attack us.” Musk reply came in public instead “Scam Altman,” “Greg Stockman,” and then a lawsuit. In court, OpenAI lawyer handed him a 2018 email from his own inbox, spelling out the plan to raise $10 billion years before he claims he learned of it. Musk, under oath: “I did not read the fine print.” The lawyer: “It’s a 4-page document.” The jury ruled against him unanimously. So count what’s left on the table: a $44 million donation, a $97.4 billion bid dead in an hour, and a $135 billion company run by the man he once mentored. He co-founded the future, then sued it and it won.

Elon Musk offered $97.4 billion to buy OpenAI, and Sam Altman answered in under 60 minutes. “no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.” Same digits, 1/10th the price the insult was in the math. Rewind to 2015, when Musk co-founded OpenAI as a nonprofit, put in $44 million and sent late-night emails about saving humanity. Then he walked. OpenAI took $13 billion from Microsoft, shipped ChatGPT and grew into a $135 billion company without him. Altman wrote him a private email: “I don’t think OpenAI would have happened without you and it really fing hurts when you publicly attack us.” Musk reply came in public instead “Scam Altman,” “Greg Stockman,” and then a lawsuit. In court, OpenAI lawyer handed him a 2018 email from his own inbox, spelling out the plan to raise $10 billion years before he claims he learned of it. Musk, under oath: “I did not read the fine print.” The lawyer: “It’s a 4-page document.” The jury ruled against him unanimously. So count what’s left on the table: a $44 million donation, a $97.4 billion bid dead in an hour, and a $135 billion company run by the man he once mentored. He co-founded the future, then sued it and it won.

West Lord

4,444,535 views • 1 month ago

The case of Elon Musk vs OpenAI CEO Sam Altman starts TODAY Jury selection begins today Monday, April 27 in federal court in Oakland, California Elon Musk is suing Sam Altman for betraying the original mission of OpenAi being a nonprofit after providing 60% of the seed funding to begin the company “The two were founding co-chairs of OpenAI years ago. Musk says he gave OpenAI $38 million during its early years, or what he says was 60% of the non-profit's seed funding. Now Musk, who also runs the AI startup called XAI Claims. Altman and others took his money and betrayed OpenAI's original non-profit status. In October, OpenAI finished restructuring with the for-profit organization reporting into a non-profit foundation” “But Altman's side says Musk agreed with them years ago about the need to convert OpenAI into a for-profit company” (VERY likely a lie) Scam Altman went from nonprofit to -> maximum profit Opening arguments are expected to begin tomorrow

The case of Elon Musk vs OpenAI CEO Sam Altman starts TODAY Jury selection begins today Monday, April 27 in federal court in Oakland, California Elon Musk is suing Sam Altman for betraying the original mission of OpenAi being a nonprofit after providing 60% of the seed funding to begin the company “The two were founding co-chairs of OpenAI years ago. Musk says he gave OpenAI $38 million during its early years, or what he says was 60% of the non-profit's seed funding. Now Musk, who also runs the AI startup called XAI Claims. Altman and others took his money and betrayed OpenAI's original non-profit status. In October, OpenAI finished restructuring with the for-profit organization reporting into a non-profit foundation” “But Altman's side says Musk agreed with them years ago about the need to convert OpenAI into a for-profit company” (VERY likely a lie) Scam Altman went from nonprofit to -> maximum profit Opening arguments are expected to begin tomorrow

Wall Street Apes

19,516 views • 4 months ago

OpenAI CEO was asked what he thinks about Elon Musk x poast saying “OpenAI will eat Microsoft alive” and Satya responding to that: Sam Altman >ummm… you know i don’t think about him that much. host: what do you think about the larger idea though that oai will eat microsoft alive long-term > OpenAI CEO: “I don’t know what that means. Do you know what the means?” host: Yeah that in the grand scheme of partnership ultimately OAI will have MORE POWER, MORE INFLUENCE, MORE LEVERAGE over Microsoft than Microsoft have over OAI > Altman: “he’s just tweeting all day how much openai sucks and how our model is bad and we’re not going to be a good company” Notice Sam Altman didn’t answer the question.

OpenAI CEO was asked what he thinks about Elon Musk x poast saying “OpenAI will eat Microsoft alive” and Satya responding to that: Sam Altman >ummm… you know i don’t think about him that much. host: what do you think about the larger idea though that oai will eat microsoft alive long-term > OpenAI CEO: “I don’t know what that means. Do you know what the means?” host: Yeah that in the grand scheme of partnership ultimately OAI will have MORE POWER, MORE INFLUENCE, MORE LEVERAGE over Microsoft than Microsoft have over OAI > Altman: “he’s just tweeting all day how much openai sucks and how our model is bad and we’re not going to be a good company” Notice Sam Altman didn’t answer the question.

NIK

271,035 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk has just Sued OpenAI, Sam Altman and Greg Brockman over them moving away from being Open Source. Musk States: "OpenAI, Inc. has been transformed into a closed-source de facto subsidiary of the largest technology company in the world: Microsoft. Under its new board, it is not just developing but is actually refining an AGI to maximize profits for Microsoft, rather than for the benefit of humanity." Musk's Claims include: - Breach of contract - Breach of fiduciary duty - Unfair business practices He is requesting that OpenAI 'revert back to open source' and that they do not profit off of their AGI technology. As much as some people attack Musk on issues, I can't help but see this as a positive move for humanity in general. Keep in mind that Musk donated $44 million of his money to OpenAI with their original "founding agreement" in mind. Whether the courts agree with is another story but it will be interesting to follow.

Elon Musk has just Sued OpenAI, Sam Altman and Greg Brockman over them moving away from being Open Source. Musk States: "OpenAI, Inc. has been transformed into a closed-source de facto subsidiary of the largest technology company in the world: Microsoft. Under its new board, it is not just developing but is actually refining an AGI to maximize profits for Microsoft, rather than for the benefit of humanity." Musk's Claims include: - Breach of contract - Breach of fiduciary duty - Unfair business practices He is requesting that OpenAI 'revert back to open source' and that they do not profit off of their AGI technology. As much as some people attack Musk on issues, I can't help but see this as a positive move for humanity in general. Keep in mind that Musk donated $44 million of his money to OpenAI with their original "founding agreement" in mind. Whether the courts agree with is another story but it will be interesting to follow.

Ed Krassenstein

260,511 views • 2 years ago

Woo hoo! OpenAI highlights HubSpot partnership on main stage at #DevDay. Today was a special day for me. Was so cool to see Sam Altman from OpenAI feature HubSpot from the main keynote stage at their Dev Day event. HubSpot and OpenAI are the two most impactful companies in my life. HubSpot, for obvious reasons and OpenAI for less obvious ones. My relationship with Sam and OpenAI goes back a bit: 1) Got access to the GPT-2 API so had my "moment of magic" well before ChatGPT launched. 2) Have been using OpenAI's APIs and platform to build apps and agents for years. They *really* understand developers and have an amazing dev experience. 3) Sold the chat .com domain name to them and as a result was able to become an investor in the company. 4) They're the primary AI platform that HubSpot partners with and builds with -- as highlighted today. My congrats to the entire OpenAI team for today's event. I know how much work goes into putting together an event like this. And it was clear from the vibes how much you folks *care*. Cheers.

Woo hoo! OpenAI highlights HubSpot partnership on main stage at #DevDay. Today was a special day for me. Was so cool to see Sam Altman from OpenAI feature HubSpot from the main keynote stage at their Dev Day event. HubSpot and OpenAI are the two most impactful companies in my life. HubSpot, for obvious reasons and OpenAI for less obvious ones. My relationship with Sam and OpenAI goes back a bit: 1) Got access to the GPT-2 API so had my "moment of magic" well before ChatGPT launched. 2) Have been using OpenAI's APIs and platform to build apps and agents for years. They really understand developers and have an amazing dev experience. 3) Sold the chat .com domain name to them and as a result was able to become an investor in the company. 4) They're the primary AI platform that HubSpot partners with and builds with -- as highlighted today. My congrats to the entire OpenAI team for today's event. I know how much work goes into putting together an event like this. And it was clear from the vibes how much you folks care. Cheers.

dharmesh

57,938 views • 10 months ago

“Let’s say you funded an organization to save the Amazon rainforest, and instead, they became a lumber company, chopped down the forest, and sold it for profit.” This is the metaphor Elon used to described what happened to OpenAI and why he decided to sue them. From day one, Musk championed rigorous AI safety and systems aligned with human consciousness, not blind optimization or raw profit. He repeatedly warned that commercial incentives could spawn irreversible dangers. After supplying major funding and drawing elite talent, Musk argues OpenAI ditched its founding charter: an open-source, nonprofit counterweight to Google. It became a closed-source, profit-chasing entity tightly bound to Microsoft. In his eyes, the shift was outright betrayal, a direct violation of the organization’s original promise.

“Let’s say you funded an organization to save the Amazon rainforest, and instead, they became a lumber company, chopped down the forest, and sold it for profit.” This is the metaphor Elon used to described what happened to OpenAI and why he decided to sue them. From day one, Musk championed rigorous AI safety and systems aligned with human consciousness, not blind optimization or raw profit. He repeatedly warned that commercial incentives could spawn irreversible dangers. After supplying major funding and drawing elite talent, Musk argues OpenAI ditched its founding charter: an open-source, nonprofit counterweight to Google. It became a closed-source, profit-chasing entity tightly bound to Microsoft. In his eyes, the shift was outright betrayal, a direct violation of the organization’s original promise.

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

34,488 views • 4 months ago

🚨 ELON TO JOE ROGAN: "THE OPENAI WHISTLEBLOWER'S SUICIDE... ALL SIGNS POINT TO MURDER” “It should be investigated. Not just drop the case. The wires to a security camera were cut. There was blood in 2 rooms. Someone else’s wig was found in the room. I mean, all signs point to it being a murder. Not saying, you know, that Sam Altman had anything to do with the murder. And the DoorDash being ordered right before the suicide, no suicide note. His parents think he was murdered. And the people I know who knew him said he was not suicidal.” Source: Joe Rogan, Elon Musk

🚨 ELON TO JOE ROGAN: "THE OPENAI WHISTLEBLOWER'S SUICIDE... ALL SIGNS POINT TO MURDER” “It should be investigated. Not just drop the case. The wires to a security camera were cut. There was blood in 2 rooms. Someone else’s wig was found in the room. I mean, all signs point to it being a murder. Not saying, you know, that Sam Altman had anything to do with the murder. And the DoorDash being ordered right before the suicide, no suicide note. His parents think he was murdered. And the people I know who knew him said he was not suicidal.” Source: Joe Rogan, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

164,672 views • 9 months ago

Elon Musk’s lawyer, Marc Toberoff, on today’s verdict in the OpenAI case: “I have a one-word reaction: Appeal. This war is not over. We firmly believe what happened with OpenAI was wrong on a very basic level that you can't raise millions of dollars in a publicly subsidized charity, and when it suits you, just turn into a for-profit operation where the officers and directors of the charity enrich themselves to the tune of billions, and that's what actually happened here, and that's just wrong."

Elon Musk’s lawyer, Marc Toberoff, on today’s verdict in the OpenAI case: “I have a one-word reaction: Appeal. This war is not over. We firmly believe what happened with OpenAI was wrong on a very basic level that you can't raise millions of dollars in a publicly subsidized charity, and when it suits you, just turn into a for-profit operation where the officers and directors of the charity enrich themselves to the tune of billions, and that's what actually happened here, and that's just wrong."

Sawyer Merritt

1,463,488 views • 3 months ago

Sam Altman just revelaed that OpenAI is generating way more revenue than the widely reported $13B number. When asked about how a company with $13B annual revenue make $1.4Tn financial commitment to invest over the next few years. In fact, he said that although there are “not many times” when he wants OpenAI to be a public company, “One of the rare times it’s appealing is when those people are writing these ridiculous ‘OpenAI is about to go out of business’ [posts], I would love to tell them they could just short the stock, and I would love to see them get burned on that.” Altman acknowledged that there are ways the company “might screw it up” — for example by failing to get access to enough computing resources — but he said that “revenue is growing steeply.” --- On 'Bg2 Pod' YT channel (link in comment)

Sam Altman just revelaed that OpenAI is generating way more revenue than the widely reported $13B number. When asked about how a company with $13B annual revenue make $1.4Tn financial commitment to invest over the next few years. In fact, he said that although there are “not many times” when he wants OpenAI to be a public company, “One of the rare times it’s appealing is when those people are writing these ridiculous ‘OpenAI is about to go out of business’ [posts], I would love to tell them they could just short the stock, and I would love to see them get burned on that.” Altman acknowledged that there are ways the company “might screw it up” — for example by failing to get access to enough computing resources — but he said that “revenue is growing steeply.” --- On 'Bg2 Pod' YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

288,564 views • 9 months ago