正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Debate settled: Cursor v0.46.11 vs Claude-Code vs Roo/Cline Controlled exp. on real use case beyond simple frontend design Settings for each agent explained in video...

18,824 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Roo Code 的头像
Roo Code1 年前

Thanks for the thoughtful comparison! I think that Roo is looping because the model's output tokens are set to 128k, which squeezes the amount of space left for input context. It's a great setting for Architect and Debug, but in my experience Code does better with 16k or less.

Affaan Mustafa 的头像
Affaan Mustafa1 年前

that makes the most sense, probably why i noticed the improvements in architect and debug

Matias Perelli 的头像
Matias Perelli1 年前

I recorded a 31-minute video on how 7-8 figure eCom brands can add $143k using 3 Klaviyo "tweaks". Watch the exact method we used recently with a client. Click below.

Danny Leffel 的头像
Danny Leffel1 年前

Thanks for the side by side comparison. We’re taking this feedback and acting on it. Stay tuned.

HIGH T3CH 的头像
HIGH T3CH1 年前

That makes me feel better even though I just spent 5 hours with Cursor deploying an A.I based hedge fund project on Netlify

Affaan Mustafa 的头像
Affaan Mustafa1 年前

making the most of your money and time at least with it

Ilyas Shahi 的头像
Ilyas Shahi1 年前

Good comparison. Cursor pricing is a bit confusing though.

Roham Mehrabi 的头像
Roham Mehrabi1 年前

I loved this video. Was wondering whether I needed to switch from cursor. Glad I don't.

Affaan Mustafa 的头像
Affaan Mustafa1 年前

a lot of noise and new tools but cursor team has been shipping updates consistently trying to stay ahead of the game and it shows

Fredo 的头像
Fredo1 年前

Will you write a post saying that was a mistake to trust o AYO project and you didnt made any money?

相关视频