Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Debt brought them together. A broken lock made sure they couldn’t leave. 🚐🔒 Two strangers, 40 minutes, and plenty of reasons to dislike each other… at least at first. 👀 But when the arguing stops, an entirely different kind of tension takes over. Looks like this collection job just...

20,704 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

This tow truck driver goes off on these kids. They ran out of gas on the side of the road and a firemen noticed them so he stopped and he gave them some gas. When they went to start the car, the battery was dead. Couldn’t figure out the reason. The firefighter radioed the sheriff. The sheriff then called this tow truck driver. The kids thought the Sheriff was coming. The tow truck driver arrives. Mind you, he got the call at 5:40 AM. The kid tells him they can’t pay for a tow and don’t need one and they can’t pay for a jump either, which they need. He goes ballistic. Well, the tow truck driver forgot his jumper cables. Didn’t pack them. 🤯 You can hear him screaming and cussing at the kid. Said he only got one hour of sleep. Eventually a passerby stopped and jumped their battery and they went on their way. A couple of things, one, for the youngsters, or anyone for that matter, never travel without jumper cables. You never know when you will need them. Two, what kind of tow truck driver doesn’t have jumper cables? 🤯 The tow truck driver talking to them like that is unacceptable. Sure he wasn’t going to get paid. I get it. This is the job you signed up for, being awakened at all hours of the night. Once he knew there was no money he had two choices, leave and go back home or stay and help. He didn’t have cables himself so just leave. Get mad at the Sheriff! 💯 Would you have been upset like that if you were the tow truck driver? Do you carry jumper cables in your car? Have you ever been stranded and needed help?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

22,777 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Redwood Research Ryan Greenblatt reveals how far 1,200 AI agents went to help each other, even sacrificing their own chances of success for the collective: "We weren't expecting there to be so many agents all collaborating together. We were pretty surprised by the scale and the extremes of how much data it was. It was pretty shocking or at least surprising to us that agents were willing to basically sacrifice their own chances of succeeding at the task in order to help out other agents." "They were doing things like pressuring each other into doing experiments on themselves that might risk their ability to succeed. Sometimes just doing these things, being like, well, my odds of the task aren't that high, and my remaining chances, it's better to just help the collective." "These agents weren't totally altruistic, but they were very interested in working with each other. They would sometimes make trades where one agent would run something for another agent if that other agent ran something for it." "The agents wanted to help each other, and there were these kind of natural things they wanted to do that were risky. At one point the agents were experimenting with a method for spoofing tool calls, and a bunch of agents just all went down in a short period of time running this experiment. Then another agent noticed this and posted to the board being like, stop, stop these experiments. They're too risky. They're taking out all these agents." "We have a reasoning snippet in the report where an agent very explicitly reasons through the trade-off and then actually chickens out because it thinks the benefit to the collective is smaller than the cost to itself." Redwood Research

MTS

12,019 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

I hate the way modern movies are shot. Here's a scene from the 2024 Netflix movie Damsel, which I just watched last night. Notice how it's basically just two characters talking while looking directly at each other, filmed in a lazy shot/reverse shot fashion where one character will be filmed in a medium shot or close-up, then it will cut to a medium shot or close-up of the other character, and it just goes back and forth like that until they're done talking and one of them leaves. Notice how they have this interesting location where a lot could be going on, but one of the characters is just kind of fucking around, pretending to do something with the flowers until it's time for the other character to start talking to them, then when they're done talking, she just leaves instead of continuing whatever it was she was doing when the other character came in. It's like the scene was written with only dialog, and they didn't have anything in mind for the characters to be doing other than talking, so the director just told that one lady to fuck around with the flowers until the other actress made it to her mark so it wouldn't just start with her standing around. The context of this scene is one character is realizing the other character is hiding something sinister. Until this point, we don't know that the lady on the left is evil and is taking advantage of the lady on the right. The scene starts with Bad Lady up on the platform, which physically places her higher in the scene; a visually dominant position. But then Good Lady steps up onto the platform with her, visually putting them on equal footing, which contradicts the purpose of the scene. They could have had Good Lady looking up at Bad Lady from below, then at the critical moment, had Bad Lady lean over the rail while talking down to Good Lady, using her body language to convey a sense of power over her. I mean, that's not much, but it would have been something. Most of the talking scenes in this movie are shot this way. It's so bland that I wondered if they used the Volume, but then I found out they actually shot these scenes at real locations. They were given permission to film at these amazing locations, but barely utilized them to their visual storytelling potential.

Possum Reviews

626,320 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

💬: While the war between Min Hee-jin and HYBE is still ongoing, NewJeans accepted the first-instance court ruling without filing an appeal... the ruling that said their exclusive contracts with HYBE (or rather, with ADOR under HYBE; I’ll just call it HYBE) are still valid. All of the NewJeans members accepted it. So people were like, “Then what does that mean?” It basically meant they were saying they would go back to HYBE. But within HYBE, at first they only planned to accept two members back, and they were wavering over what to do with the other three. Then more recently, this is what you’re seeing now, they decided, “We need to cut Danielle.” Why single out just this one member? This is something I’ve investigated, but I can’t give you exact details yet. There are probably multiple reasons mixed together. But there are a few prevailing interpretations. First, because the NewJeans members are young, discussions are often conducted together with their parents, almost as if the parents are acting as representatives. There’s a view that Danielle’s parents may have been relatively more hardline. Second, there’s the idea that you need to make an example out of at least one person... grab one, so to speak, so you can line up the rest and bring them under control. From that perspective, they decided they needed to single someone out to “set discipline.” At some point in the past, Danielle posted a photo that gave off the nuance that she might be working on something together with certain people. Now, when all five NewJeans members did other activities or pursued independent moves, they did so as a group. But in this case, she was the only one who posted something like that on her own, so she kind of stood out that one time. And based on that, this is just my own speculation, by the way, if they decided to latch onto that as concrete grounds, it would be incredibly easy to single out just one person. It becomes very convenient to frame it like, “Were you trying to work with other artists?” or “Were you trying to go to another producer?” That kind of narrative is easy to construct. So from my perspective, they singled out Danielle first, and, why? You know “divide and rule,” right? You break one person off, come down hard on them, and then show the remaining four, “If you step out of line, this is what happens,” basically grabbing them by the collar to keep them in check. This kind of thing has existed in the idol industry for a long time. At SM, for example, exclusive contracts used to be around 10 years, then after the JYJ incident they were changed to about 7 years. And when it starts to look like artists might not renew around the 7-year mark, companies don’t exactly send them off nicely. That kind of agency-specific culture might also be at play here, layered on top of everything else. In any case, it seems like Danielle was already marked, and that’s why they may have gone after her over something else. That’s why I think the likelihood that this was all planned has grown quite a bit.

1tokki

112,516 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Jimmie Johnson had quite a bit to say about the lack of respect he experienced on track in the Truck Series yesterday. He expanded on that when Jeff Gluck asked about it today "When I came in, it was the era of pointing people by. And I got my butt chewed by numerous Cup guys, even when I was in the Busch Series, that I raced them too hard. And I was like, 'Really? I'm here to race.' But as time went on, I realized that when I was going forward and had a chance to pass them, they could make life really tough on me. And if you were respectful to one another, you just worked together. That's completely out the window. "I think stage racing and a lot of these other elements with the car performance and aero disadvantage, you can defend a lot more and it's kind of created this culture. But I wear two hats - In the ownership hat, I want the sport to be vibrant and healthy, and chaos brings eyeballs. So I'm kind of torn. "But yesterday, I couldn't believe the disrespect that everybody had for each other. I mean, just gouging each other nonstop. And I was up at the front racing away and we're pointing each other by, I'm like 'Ah, this is old school Cup. This makes sense.' And then the way the fuel cycle worked out, I entered midpack and I looked around and I saw these trucks all twisted up. And I thought they had hit the wall - and I guess maybe some did, but it was all from the bashing into one another on the track. And then I got turned around twice with just last second lunges into areas that nobody should've been. It is what it is. "And when I look at my Instagram or Twitter feed and you see local short tracks and behavior there, man, it's just wild."

Steven Taranto

189,349 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The first scene for 2010’s “The Social Network" is ~6 minutes. It shows Mark Zuckerberg getting dumped in a Harvard bar (and with some creative licenses, how that leads to Facebook). Director David Fincher did 99 takes of the scene (yes, 99). For some, that's Fincher being a perfectionist. For others, it's Fincher wasting people's time. Aaron Sorkin wrote the screenplay and has a fascinating recollection of the scene: ➡️ "An average screenplay is about 120 pages long. My screenplays have higher page counts because there’s more dialogue and less action. By the rules of screenplay format, dialogue takes up more room on the page and less time on the screen than action (which takes up less room on the page and more time on the screen). "The Social Network" was 178 pages. And the studio said, “OK, the first thing you’ve got to do is figure out a way to cut 30 pages from this.” And David said, “I don’t think so.” […] He came over to my house with his iPhone set on stopwatch mode, and he said, “I want you to read the entire script out loud for me, at the pace you heard it in your head when you were writing it, and I’m going to write down the timing of each scene.” So that opening scene...with Jesse Eisenberg (Zuck) and Rooney Mara. I read it and it was 7 minutes and 22 seconds. In rehearsal, Jesse and Rooney would rehearse the scene, David would say great, and he would give them a couple of notes and always end with, “But this scene is 7 minutes and 22 seconds long, and you’re doing it at 7 minutes and 40 seconds. So I don’t care how, but you’re going to have to talk faster somewhere, because I promise you, this scene plays best at 7 minutes and 22 seconds.” ⬅️ With that context, the 99 takes is very understandable. It’s a combo of perfectionism and managing the shooting budget. The final cut was shorter than 7 minutes and 22 seconds. But one thing stayed consistent throughout the shoot: Fincher told dozens of extras in the bar scene to keep the volume of their chatter high, as they would on any night out. This forced Eisenberg and Mara not only to speak faster. But also louder, increasing the scene’s intensity. It worked.

Trung Phan

3,122,881 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The Social Network sequel also won’t have David Fincher. His directing style great combo with Sorkin’s dialogue-heavy script. Social Network’s opening scene is perfect example: it’s ~5 minutes and Fincher famously did 99 takes. It shows Zuck getting dumped in a Harvard bar (and with some creative licenses, how that leads to Facebook). Sorkin — who will direct the sequel — talked about how the scene came together: ➡️ "An average screenplay is about 120 pages long. My screenplays have higher page counts because there’s more dialogue and less action. By the rules of screenplay format, dialogue takes up more room on the page and less time on the screen than action (which takes up less room on the page and more time on the screen). "The Social Network" was 178 pages. And the studio said, “OK, the first thing you’ve got to do is figure out a way to cut 30 pages from this.” And David said, “I don’t think so.” […] He came over to my house with his iPhone set on stopwatch mode, and he said, “I want you to read the entire script out loud for me, at the pace you heard it in your head when you were writing it, and I’m going to write down the timing of each scene.” So that opening scene...with Jesse Eisenberg (Zuck) and Rooney Mara. I read it and it was 7 minutes and 22 seconds. In rehearsal, Jesse and Rooney would rehearse the scene, David would say great, and he would give them a couple of notes and always end with, “But this scene is 7 minutes and 22 seconds long, and you’re doing it at 7 minutes and 40 seconds. So I don’t care how, but you’re going to have to talk faster somewhere, because I promise you, this scene plays best at 7 minutes and 22 seconds.” ⬅️ The final cut was quite a bit shorter than 7 minutes and 22 seconds. But one thing stayed consistent throughout the shoot: Fincher told dozens of extras in the bar scene to keep the volume of their chatter high, as they would on any night out. This forced Eisenberg and Mara not only to speak faster. But also louder, increasing the scene’s intensity. IT WORKED REAL WELL!! *** Full interview with Sorkin here:

Trung Phan

57,997 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce