Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Decentralization isn’t a buzzword. It’s our backbone. Avail is now #2 by Nakamoto Coefficient with a score of 35 — meaning it would take 35 independent validators colluding to halt the Avail Mainnet. Avail’s architecture incentivizes stake distribution. Our Substrate-based reward mechanism naturally pushes stake away from a few...

42,008 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Y’all need to be prepared for learning how much of our taxpayer dollars have been given to the groups that have been organizing a color revolution inside our own borders. It’s not just George Soros, the huge foundations and the donor advised funds. It’s your tax dollars. The Inflation Reduction Act and all of the money earmarked for “Environmental and Climate Justice” is a large part of this. The money isn’t all coming from the state department, it’s also coming from the EPA. Soros’ networks of organizations along with all of the other large foundations play a role too. The foreign governments involved are the ones I’ve been telling you guys for well over a year: China, Venezuela, Cuba, Iran (and its terror proxies), along with the cartels. This funding network is huge and very complex. When Joe Biden said, "Through my investments, the most significant climate change law ever. And by the way, it is a $369 billion bill." "It's called the [Inflation Reduction Act]. We should have named it what it was." That had meaning. There are billions of dollars being funneled into activist organizations. The Power Forward Communities and a whole list of others have meaning. It’s all about to be exposed. Getting the entire web mapped out is very hard. It will happen. It’s coming together. This is criminal. Our taxpayer dollars have been being used to fund the left and their activism under the guise of environmental and climate justice.

SKDoubleDub

46,720 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

This is what I’m talking about. This isn’t to highlight Bentancur. It’s how 90% of teams and players behave for I’d say 70% of the game. But what are we trying to achieve here? The best thing that can happen from any phase of play, is to score a goal. So that’s the overall objective. To do that, the ball at some stage has to go behind every single opposition player and space has to be exploited whether it’s big or small. But Bentancur here is waiting. Waiting for players to move. Waiting for opposition to move. But why would Newcastle move? They don’t need to break from their shape. But imagine what would happen if Bentancur travelled with the ball into those open spaces. Newcastle and spurs players aren’t just going to watch, it’s going to instigate a chain reaction of movement from both sides. And that will in turn break up shapes which creates gaps. Then it’s if you are confident and able to exploit. But just waiting doesn’t achieve it. Imagine the disruption you will cause if both the ball player, and off ball players look to provoke the opposition as opposed to rigidly stand in shape. It’s just logical. If you stay still. Why does the opposition need to move? So what pictures are changing? What gaps are you opening? What gaps are you exploiting? So how do you expect to score when to score a goal, gaps have to be exploited? It’s why when people say “it’s harder in modern football, there’s less space”. No there isn’t. There’s always space. You’re just seeing players less willing to provoke it and attack it.

Harry Brooks

14,215 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten