Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Déda et al. use neural networks for flow analysis & control in nonlinear fluid systems, showcasing accuracy & stabilization in complex dynamics. From the Lorenz system to confined cylinder flows, neural networks shine as effective models & controllers.

11,604 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Biomni Lab lets biologists collaborate with AI agents to finish complex tasks end-to-end. Here are 15 popular use cases, each link is a full replay so you can watch the agent work through every step: 1. Spatial transcriptomics analysis: map gene expression across tissue architecture from spatial transcriptomics data, with spatial clustering and neighborhood analysis. 2. Binder design: design de novo protein binders against a target structure using computational protein design tools. 3. Biomarker panel design: identify and optimize a multi-marker diagnostic or prognostic panel from omics data. 4. Clinical trial landscaping: search and summarize the trial landscape for a disease area, mapping phase, endpoints, and sponsor activity. 5. Survival analysis: pull clinical and expression data, fit Cox models, generate Kaplan-Meier curves, and identify prognostic markers. 6. scRNA-seq processing and annotation: from raw counts to UMAP clustering, marker gene detection, and automated cell type labeling. 7. Cell-cell communication: infer ligand-receptor interactions between cell types from single-cell data and map intercellular signaling networks. 8. Primer design for novel Cas13: analyze a putative Cas13 protein from a metagenomic screen—verify the ORF, identify HEPN domains, and design cloning primers with restriction sites and a FLAG 9. Proteomics differential expression: normalize mass spec data, run statistical tests, and visualize differentially abundant proteins. 10. Gene regulatory network inference: reconstruct transcription factor-target gene networks from expression data and identify key regulators. 11. Gene co-expression network analysis: build weighted co-expression networks, identify gene modules, and correlate them with phenotypic traits. 12. Microbiome analysis: process 16S/metagenomic sequencing data to profile microbial communities, diversity, and differential abundance. 13. Polygenic risk scores: compute and evaluate PRS from GWAS summary statistics against a target cohort. 14. Variant annotation: annotate genetic variants with functional predictions, allele frequencies, and clinical significance. 15. Fine-mapping: narrow GWAS loci to credible causal variants using statistical fine-mapping methods. Each of these would normally take days to weeks of scripting, debugging, and iteration. In Biomni Lab, the agent handles the full execution while you steer the science. Learn more:

Kexin Huang

27,189 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Model-Free Reinforcement Learning (MFRL) has been alluring, especially with supercharged compute with physics on GPU. However, the methods use 0-th order gradients, and are often not the best optimizers. Can we do better than PPO in continuous control for robotics? Turns out yes! 🥳 tl;dr: Faster, better RL than PPO in continuous control 💪 The answer lies in using more information from the simulation. We are juicing the simulation on GPU as it is, why not use it for gradients as well? This has been a driving question in a series of our works. We first studied this problem in ICLR 2022 paper on Short Horizon Actor Critic Naive gradient based methods are stuck in local minima and have exploding/vanishing gradients. SHAC solved this problem truncated rollouts and model based value estimation, where the model is Differentiable Sim. This boosted sample efficiency and wall-clock time immensely especially in high dimensional systems such as humanoids Yet, given enough compute PPO often caught up. Our follow up paper on on Adaptive Horizon Actor Critic at ICML 2024 discovers the cause and provides a fix. However, we find that even when given ground-truth dynamics, not all gradients are useful due to sample error. 1st-Order Model-Based Reinforcement Learning methods employing differentiable simulation provide gradients with reduced variance but are susceptible to bias in scenarios involving stiff dynamics, such as physical contact. We find that back-propagating through contact and long trajectories drastically reduces gradient accuracy. Using this insight, we propose AHAC to dynamically adapt its roll-out horizon to avoid differentiating through stiff contact. AHAC is a first-order model-based RL algorithm that learns high-dimensional tasks in minutes (wall clock) and outperforms PPO by 40%, even in the limit of data provided to PPO. This work is led by Ignat Georgiev alongside Krishnan Srinivasan, Jie Xu, Eric Heiden and ample assistance from warp team at NVIDIA Robotics (Miles Macklin)

Animesh Garg

52,300 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren