正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨 Deep dive on a high-performing $PDD option contract from unusual_whales 🐳 — ran from $5.10 to $13.20 (+158.82%) and still sits 7% in the money. In this video, I break down: • The original whale entry • Spot price vs. IV spike • Bid/ask dynamics • Why not...

154,536 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Great simulation of the Ferrari Döner wing posted on LinkedIn by Dominik Bolasko. There are still some irregularities in this simulation, like the wing profiles being different than the actual Döner wing, but it looks to be one of the more accurate sims I have seen so far. One very interesting aspect of this simulation is the magnitude of the flow field disruption from the intermediate sail position. All DRS flaps naturally have a hysteresis with respect to flow recovery and attachment on flap closure. Hysteresis, in the simplest terms, is the difference in the value you get from the same device in one setting compared to another. In this case what we are looking at is the downforce the wing give you before opening, and after opening. So why would you have hysteresis? Well the flow will take some time to recover snd reattach after a big geometry change bringing back the full load (downforce) to the rear of the car for the braking zone. This exists for all cars that have a flap geometry change like this. However, the magnitude of the flow disruption can further delay this recovery causing the car to not re-establish the full load potential in the first phase of braking. So, I could certainly believe that the hysteresis for this type of wing would be greater than that of a conventional flap because of how much flow disturbance you have from that intermediate sail position. Meaning the rear of the Ferrari on initial braking could have some nervousness as the flow takes more time to re-attach and recover the load on the rear wing. In fact, this is exactly what Dominik found in his simulations (image 2). I did speak with someone with a team, and this was one aspect they indeed had considered as a negative to this design when they first saw it. It’s possible that’s part of what was being tested when they ran it during testing in Bahrain. Do you think we will see this wing again during the season?

Dr Obbs

78,898 次观看 • 5 个月前

$365K profit while the programmer slept. This bot found a hole in volatility and turned it into a personal ATM. Let's be honest. If you're trying to trade on Polymarket based on news or intuition you're not a trader. You're food. I analyzed the distinct-baguette wallet. No genius analytics. No White House insiders. Just cold code exploiting a 3-cent error in the order book. How does he make money out of thin air? His profile: At the core of the algorithm lies a simple mathematical glitch called Arbitrage Loop. In a perfect world the price of YES and NO shares always adds up to $1.00. But when chaos hits the market during matches or BTC news liquidity breaks. The bot finds the moment when YES costs 48 cents and NO costs 49 cents. Entry sum: 97 cents. The script instantly buys both sides. It doesn't care who wins. It just waits for expiration and is guaranteed to get $1.00. Result: 3 cents of pure risk-free profit per dollar. Repeat this 15000 times a month and you get his balance. Math vs Human A human is physically incapable of replicating this. Your reaction from eye to brain to click: 0.4 seconds. Python script reaction: 0.005 seconds. By the time you see the price on screen it's already gone. You're looking at ghosts. Trying to outrun this bot manually is like trying to stop a train with your palm. You're simply paying his bills with your slippage. How to stop being liquidity? In 2026 you either write code or you're feed. But there's a third option. You don't need to learn C++ or rent a server in the same rack as the exchange. You just need the right entry. I found a gateway that allows copying the logic of such wallets. You stop playing guessing games and connect to the smart money flow. When the algorithm finds a hole in the price you enter alongside it. Automatically. Stop trading against machines. Stand on their side: While you were reading this text the glitch happened three more times. Someone took that money. Why not you?

Blaze

16,039 次观看 • 6 个月前

📊 Staking Analytics Just Got a Major Upgrade on Loky Terminal STAKE ARENA & STAKE GODS ARE HERE - The new dashboard gives you a granular look into staking across Genesis + OG agents — from top wallets to net flow dynamics. Here's what we're seeing: – Top Stakers by $ value – Dev vs Non-dev wallet activity – Daily staking vs unstaking flows – Net Stake Ratio (Genesis vs OG) – 24H + Weekly leaderboards – Virgen & Staker growth trends – Gamified insights you can act on 🟡 Staking Momentum Is Holding Strong Total stakers crossed 79,000 as of July 1st, 2025. Despite short-term dips, the weekly staker trend remains up, showing strong interest in Virtuals ecosystem participation. 📈 Genesis Net Stake Is Tightening Total stake has hit 24.15B, but net stake is flattening at 13.72B, showing ~43% of staked volume has been withdrawn. 🏆 Top 24H Movers $SIYA saw the biggest 24H spike with 567M staked by just 2 wallets — possibly a major whale entry. $WACH, $DARE, and $AURA continue to attract high wallet counts, confirming consistent community traction. 📊 OG vs Genesis Agent Dynamics OG and Genesis agents are neck-and-neck in net volume. Whale positioning continues to shape new staking flows. 🧠 Whale Activity Insights The top wallet staked $3.6M across BYTE. Wallets are increasingly diversifying across dozens of agents like WACH, SIYA, SOLACE, ROOM, OOPZ, etc. Some top stakers are now active across 30+ agents, signaling high conviction in ACP token launches. Unstaking Trends - Unstaking volume rose to 10.4B, highest so far. - Most visible in June’s last 10 days—likely synced with agent unlocks or short-term speculation. - Yet daily new stakers bounced back to 3.7K on July 1st, indicating rotational staking rather than exit. Key Takeaway The ecosystem is entering a more dynamic, rotational phase — high inflow from new stakers, rising whale concentration in top agents, and sharper patterns in staking/unstaking cycles. If you're building, tracking, or planning to stake smart— The Loky Terminal is all you need →

Loky | Agent Infra

24,500 次观看 • 1 年前

When I’m trying to improve the user experience of my applications, one of the most valuable things is being able to see an entire user flow as a storyboard. Not just one screen or screenshot at a time. This is something I love using the `/visual-plan` skill for. You can describe any flow you want, and the agent will look through your code and wireframe out a storyboard of what the flow looks like. Then you can visualize the steps in a simplified way and spot areas to improve. Recently, I found that in certain flows we were still asking for organizations, even though I thought I had gotten rid of that and made it automatic. A quick storyboard let me see all the different code paths in a simple, visual, intuitive way. Spot the areas of the flow I didn’t want. And have the agent fix it. Sign up, onboarding, and setup flows are usually some of the most important experiences in your app. And usually the least looked at. Especially because it can be hard to reproduce every flow, for every situation, for every user type, feature flag, or whatever else you have. The `/visual-plan` skill lets you visualize any part of your code. Either to understand the current state, plan out a new state, or recap updates that were made. I’m pretty addicted to this skill. I use it for a lot of other things too, so let me know if you want to see videos on those. And of course it’s all open source. You can grab it on my GitHub. I'll link to it in the thread. If you try it, let me know your feedback.

Steve (Builder.io)

147,324 次观看 • 1 个月前