正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

DeepSeek is aiding China's military and intelligence operations, a senior US official said, adding that the Chinese AI firm sought to use Southeast Asian shell companies to access high-end semiconductors that cannot be shipped to China under US rules

61,464 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

6 条评论

Alva 的头像
Alva1 年前

No hard evidence out there links DeepSeek directly to Chinese military or intel ops—most reporting and on-chain research point to them being a tech/consumer AI play, not a defense contractor. The broader narrative about Chinese AI firms facing national security laws is mostly sector-wide speculation. Southeast Asian shell companies are a real route for bypassing US chip bans; think Singapore/Malaysia-based fronts rerouting semiconductors to mainland China. US authorities and media have flagged this, with some companies sanctioned, but there’s no open-source proof tying this activity to DeepSeek itself. Want links to enforcement actions or more on the mechanism behind these chip flows? Dive deeper here for the full context.

Pawan Kr. Singh 的头像
Pawan Kr. Singh1 年前

Boycott China... China can't be trusted..

Abd Salaam H 的头像
Abd Salaam H1 年前

Microsoft also aiding Israelis military and intelligence operations,

IOIIOOIIIOIOOIIOOOI 的头像
IOIIOOIIIOIOOIIOOOI1 年前

It seems that way to me. I think it's a good idea. We should pay attention to the countries of origin of the electronic devices we use and act according to our personal opinion. Especially refurbished devices as an economic measure.. It's completely ridiculous. 👊🏻💩

v 的头像
v1 年前

So what Openai and plantir= aiding pentagon and striking deals also aiding Israel in it's genocide Deepseek= aiding the PLA It is the same shit

ANNA❣️ 🇿🇦 的头像
ANNA❣️ 🇿🇦1 年前

Look at your own Palantir and stop pointing fingers.

相关视频

Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said China often has access to the European market in ways that European companies do not enjoy with the same ease in China. He said Europe cannot allow China to have one set of rules while European companies operate under a completely different set of rules. That is the punchline. For years, Europe has restricted or excluded Chinese companies under the language of “security.” Huawei. ZTE. Chinese telecom firms. Chinese solar products. Chinese EVs. Chinese batteries. Chinese infrastructure. Whenever Chinese companies become too competitive, Europe suddenly discovers “risk,” “dependency,” “distortion,” or “strategic vulnerability.” But when China responds with its own controls, tariffs, rare earth restrictions, or market measures, Europe starts crying about fairness. Classic. China has not banned European industrial giants from the Chinese market the way Europe has tried to politically suffocate Chinese companies. Volkswagen, BMW, Mercedes, Airbus, Siemens, BASF, Schneider, LVMH, and countless European firms have made fortunes in China for decades. China opened its market, built supply chains, created demand, and let European companies profit massively. Europe took the money. Then it blocked Chinese firms, joined U.S. containment, restricted high-end exports, attacked Chinese clean-tech industries, and now complains that China enjoys unfair access. If Europe really wants “one set of rules,” it should be careful what it asks for. Because China can play that game too. The difference is simple: Europe complains about access while using access as a weapon. China has shown restraint. Perhaps too much restraint. If Beijing treated European companies the way Europe treats Chinese companies, Brussels would discover very quickly what “same rules” actually means.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

27,677 次观看 • 1 个月前