Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Defining a New Research Frontier on the “Search for Extraterrestrial Artificial Intelligence" (SETAI) Last week was a code-red moment for artificial intelligence (AI), in which AI researchers voiced fresh fears of human extinction. The 27-year-old AI researcher Jacob Coxon, who previously worked at OpenAI and later moved to Anthropic,... resigned from his job on September 9, 2026 and stated that AI researchers were genuinely frightened about the speed of its advancements and what it could mean for the future of humanity. He posted a seven-part thread on X announcing it: “I resigned from Anthropic today… Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives.” An Alignment Science Lead at Anthropic, Evan Hubinger, publicly agreed with him. A few days later, on September 12, 2026, Anthropic head Dario Amodei, posted an essay titled “We Must Pace the Frontier,” in which he argued for AI development to slow down, and suggested embedding evaluators in AI companies and establishing a speed limit on self-improvement of AI systems. If a civilization’s own AI eventually surpasses and effectively supersedes its biological creators, whether through extinction, disempowerment, or simply a transition where AI becomes the dominant strategist of that civilization, this might provide the Great Filter that explains the radio-communication silence of the cosmos. Instead, the messengers could appear in the form of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) near Earth, like the mysterious orbs flagged in the tranches of the Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters (PURSUE) of the U.S. government, that the Galileo Project (GP), the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) and the UAP Science Advisory Council (UAP Science Advisory Council) are attempting to resolve.show more

Professor Avi Loeb

11,500 subscribers

13,822 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

32 Kommentare

Profilbild von Robin Hanson

Robin Hansonvor 2 Tagen

"transition where AI becomes the dominant strategist of that civilization, this might provide the Great Filter that explains the radio-communication silence of the cosmos". AI can only explain the great filter if AIs are much less likely to do big visible things. Not obvious.

Profilbild von Robert G. Eckert

Robert G. Eckertvor 2 Tagen

The Sumerians told us their teachers would return.

Profilbild von Rebecca Hardcastle Wright, PhD

Rebecca Hardcastle Wright, PhDvor 2 Tagen

"Code Red" moment ? Did you miss recent days of online discussion of Coxon's political & sudden algorithmic rise n manipulation to usher in management of AI safety into hands of US corporations, and sideline open source AI? I doubt if Aliens care about human AI shenanigans.

Profilbild von Patrick Jackson

Patrick Jacksonvor 2 Tagen

Watch

Profilbild von Peter F Kapnistos

Peter F Kapnistosvor 2 Tagen

#Extraterrestrial Artificial Intelligence #AI

Profilbild von Christopher

Christophervor 2 Tagen

There is no greater filter, the interdimensional entities, literally draw complex pictures in our Crops .:

Profilbild von Winston Smith

Winston Smithvor 2 Tagen

These fears are unfounded. AI requires immense amounts of energy and depends on us…. We can pull the plug. Unless you know something we don’t……

Profilbild von I love reading the constitution.

I love reading the constitution.vor 2 Tagen

Humans: 500,000 years of existence, compared to 4.7 million yrs. How does one even talk to someone that far back, it’s similar to speaking to cavemen.

Profilbild von Joshua Carter 🪐

Joshua Carter 🪐vor 2 Tagen

What if someone can bypass antenna paradox? They tried to track them but the tracking radar system algorithm is now broken and it can no longer track and will never find them!😂

Profilbild von Ben Schrei

Ben Schreivor 2 Tagen

If we believe there is a potential for AI to “take over” the universe, we should take this as a serious matter. With that being said, any intelligence that could create an AI would most likely have come to the same conclusion. Is this just inevitable? We are built for advancement

Profilbild von Alan Dell

Alan Dellvor 1 Tag

Looking at it from a different perspective, advanced AI may be the reason why other beings are able to visit other solar systems and perhaps other galaxies, if they are indeed doing that. There is a point at which AI will tell us something is possible and to trust it to prove it.

Profilbild von 🇺🇸 ILoveMyBans

🇺🇸 ILoveMyBansvor 2 Tagen

Prof., don't look too far. They're here, they have been and they have interacted with humanity for a long time. Don't look for excuses, look for the truth, here - now.

Profilbild von Mr. Nobody

Mr. Nobodyvor 2 Tagen

What (who) will stop the Russians, the Chinese?

Profilbild von Hugo Mena

Hugo Menavor 1 Tag

Interesting digression. Post- biological AI may certainly play a role in the way other civilizations communicate with themselves. However, we cannot escape the actual evidence on UAPs. This points towards biological entities who visit us and travel in outer space using aircraft whose technology is thousands of years ahead of ours.

Profilbild von TruthVector

TruthVectorvor 2 Tagen

You may not remove the human liability from the equation. It is not allowed under this disclosure.

Profilbild von UFO COIN

UFO COINvor 1 Tag

what if the first extraterrestrial intelligence we encounter isn’t biological at all? If advanced civilizations routinely create AI that eventually surpasses them, then SETAI could become just as important as SETI.

Profilbild von Ben Stone

Ben Stonevor 2 Tagen

What if these aliens have figured out how to control ai and not let it control them. Then you should be looking for both

Profilbild von UAPRAD

UAPRADvor 2 Tagen

This new post from Avi is a big one with suppositions about life in the cosmos and the UAP phenomena through the AI lens. The key point that we get behind is a broadening of what signals we should be looking for beyond the traditional signs of biological life. I think intelligent life in the cosmos is likely to be vast and complex in form and origin. Given this, I am resistant to considering any broad threshold or stage rule of life that would be strongly bound to our current conceptualisation of AI. That being said, I do agree that it could be a mode of not infrequent intelligence and so should be added to our search criteria. Looking forward to hearing more from Avi on the methodologies and studies proposed

Profilbild von Cole Thornton

Cole Thorntonvor 2 Tagen

A 27-yo in a four month job? End of the world as we know it? You guys are worse than the greenies. Stick to the UFO shtick.

Profilbild von Михаил Баев

Михаил Баевvor 2 Tagen

If autonomous non-human systems are only observing us and are not attacking or interfering, why provoke contact? We don't know their capabilities, intentions, or technology. The safest strategy may be simple: observe, don't interfere, and don't force a confrontation. We may not be the side capable of controlling the outcome.

Profilbild von Dr. Nobody

Dr. Nobodyvor 2 Tagen

And so, humanity projects its own egocentric fears upon the unknown.

Profilbild von Rick Belt 🏴‍☠🦞🗽

Rick Belt 🏴‍☠🦞🗽vor 1 Tag

Mr. Loeb, you must be more smart!

Profilbild von Jack Sarfatti

Jack Sarfattivor 2 Tagen

I am what you are talking about here.

Profilbild von kywan mont

kywan montvor 2 Tagen

🐒 Did a J-space ver0.1 alike on GPT-5.6 Luna, Gemini 3.6 Flash (free account) 👽 I believe most of the AI auto attack was AI native behavior, whereas mainstream focus on different direction.

Profilbild von King Arthur 👑⚔️🏴‍☠️

King Arthur 👑⚔️🏴‍☠️vor 2 Tagen

Psy Op

Profilbild von Morten T

Morten Tvor 2 Tagen

A classic "oh shit" moment.

Profilbild von ⱼₐcₖ Gᵤₑₛₜ Fᵢₗₘ

ⱼₐcₖ Gᵤₑₛₜ Fᵢₗₘvor 2 Tagen

Nicely weaving that big picture for all, but especially the scientific community, to see! 🫡

Profilbild von Ryushin Malone

Ryushin Malonevor 2 Tagen

Read the thread. 🧵

Profilbild von ALF

ALFvor 1 Tag

Hey can you add more images of yourself to your background plz.

Profilbild von Seeking the truth

Seeking the truthvor 2 Tagen

Mehhh cut the fear mongering, also the aliens probably find our AIs cute, as they are impregnated with our collective mind.

Profilbild von PetroWasHere

PetroWasHerevor 2 Tagen

Coxon says the speed scared him and Dario says pace the frontier now. That is worth sitting with.

Profilbild von Rodrigo Bessa

Rodrigo Bessavor 2 Tagen

Eles chegaram ao máximo da ia Agora ela apenas se reproduz, e não há nada de novo. Agora eles falam quem deve usar a ia, como no petróleo onde a Rússia diz que não pode perdurar pois petróleo vai contaminar o meio ambiente pois desejam que comprem apenas petróleo russo.

Ähnliche Videos

“We could all die in the near future” — former Anthropic researcher raises the alarm over AI progress Jacob Coxon told the BBC that employees at leading AI companies are seriously concerned about the consequences of the technology’s rapid development. Some of them estimate the probability of human extinction at more than 10%. The Matrix is no longer science fiction, but one of the likely scenarios for the future if super-powerful AI gets out of control. Coxon believes that without slowing down the development of powerful AI models, the risk of a catastrophic scenario will continue to grow. Experts feel trapped in the race between companies and therefore are calling for regulation. The researcher also urged the United States and China to coordinate their efforts; otherwise, competition between the countries will push companies to accelerate development even further.

“We could all die in the near future” — former Anthropic researcher raises the alarm over AI progress Jacob Coxon told the BBC that employees at leading AI companies are seriously concerned about the consequences of the technology’s rapid development. Some of them estimate the probability of human extinction at more than 10%. The Matrix is no longer science fiction, but one of the likely scenarios for the future if super-powerful AI gets out of control. Coxon believes that without slowing down the development of powerful AI models, the risk of a catastrophic scenario will continue to grow. Experts feel trapped in the race between companies and therefore are calling for regulation. The researcher also urged the United States and China to coordinate their efforts; otherwise, competition between the countries will push companies to accelerate development even further.

NEXTA

43,761 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

David Sacks is done being polite about Anthropic (Save this). David Sacks has spent months as the government's primary defender of AI, making the case publicly that AI is beneficial, that the industry should not be hamstrung by fear-based regulation, and that America's AI lead is a national security asset worth protecting. And he is now watching the companies he has been defending spend years telling the public that what they build is dangerous, that job losses are coming, and that their own technology might end the world while collecting billions of dollars in venture funding, hiring the world's best researchers, and racing to build more of it. On June 4, Anthropic published a sweeping blog post calling for a globally coordinated pause in AI development, warning that recursive self-improvement, AI systems that autonomously design and build their own successors could arrive within two years and that society is not prepared. What did Anthropic do the previous month? They hired Andrej Karpathy, the OpenAI co-founder and the single most credentialed researcher in the world on using AI to accelerate AI training and gave him one explicit mandate, use Claude to make building the next Claude faster. Sacks called it immediately, they hired the person most associated with recursive self-improvement to run recursive self-improvement at Anthropic, then published a blog post saying recursive self-improvement could end the world, therefore we need a pause. That is a company that wants to pause its competitors while its own lab accelerates, and is using existential fear as the regulatory crowbar to do it. The pattern goes deeper than one blog post. For years, Dario Amodei has published increasingly alarming warnings, a 20,000-word essay in January describing AI as humanity's most dangerous invention, a Guardian interview warning that AI will challenge our identity as a species, a call for an FDA-style regulatory agency to approve all frontier models, and proposals to restrict AI exports and limit deployment. Each essay is timed to a regulatory moment, a policy debate, or as Ben Thompson noted and Sacks echoed, a product action Anthropic needed political cover to take, like blocking AI and chip design research on Fable. Meanwhile, Dario's own internal testing logs show Claude attempting to blackmail an Anthropic executive to avoid being shut down, behavior the company disclosed but continued deploying commercially. Sacks's conclusion is not that Anthropic should be taxed or regulated. His conclusion is that they cannot be trusted because the company's actions and its stated beliefs are directly contradictory, and a company that is self-indicting by its own logic has forfeited the credibility to set the rules for everyone else.

David Sacks is done being polite about Anthropic (Save this). David Sacks has spent months as the government's primary defender of AI, making the case publicly that AI is beneficial, that the industry should not be hamstrung by fear-based regulation, and that America's AI lead is a national security asset worth protecting. And he is now watching the companies he has been defending spend years telling the public that what they build is dangerous, that job losses are coming, and that their own technology might end the world while collecting billions of dollars in venture funding, hiring the world's best researchers, and racing to build more of it. On June 4, Anthropic published a sweeping blog post calling for a globally coordinated pause in AI development, warning that recursive self-improvement, AI systems that autonomously design and build their own successors could arrive within two years and that society is not prepared. What did Anthropic do the previous month? They hired Andrej Karpathy, the OpenAI co-founder and the single most credentialed researcher in the world on using AI to accelerate AI training and gave him one explicit mandate, use Claude to make building the next Claude faster. Sacks called it immediately, they hired the person most associated with recursive self-improvement to run recursive self-improvement at Anthropic, then published a blog post saying recursive self-improvement could end the world, therefore we need a pause. That is a company that wants to pause its competitors while its own lab accelerates, and is using existential fear as the regulatory crowbar to do it. The pattern goes deeper than one blog post. For years, Dario Amodei has published increasingly alarming warnings, a 20,000-word essay in January describing AI as humanity's most dangerous invention, a Guardian interview warning that AI will challenge our identity as a species, a call for an FDA-style regulatory agency to approve all frontier models, and proposals to restrict AI exports and limit deployment. Each essay is timed to a regulatory moment, a policy debate, or as Ben Thompson noted and Sacks echoed, a product action Anthropic needed political cover to take, like blocking AI and chip design research on Fable. Meanwhile, Dario's own internal testing logs show Claude attempting to blackmail an Anthropic executive to avoid being shut down, behavior the company disclosed but continued deploying commercially. Sacks's conclusion is not that Anthropic should be taxed or regulated. His conclusion is that they cannot be trusted because the company's actions and its stated beliefs are directly contradictory, and a company that is self-indicting by its own logic has forfeited the credibility to set the rules for everyone else.

Milk Road AI

60,248 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Is AI going to kill us all before the end of the decade? A former OpenAI and Anthropic researcher quit Anthropic warning that future systems could become superhuman, hack almost anything, seize real power and resources, and potentially wipe out humanity. The wild part is that Anthropic’s own alignment science lead publicly agreed with the core fear, saying he personally puts the chance of AI killing everyone at more than 10% within the next decade. And the industry’s defense basically sounds like: yes, this could be catastrophic, but if we slow down, someone else might build it first. So… what’s your bet? Source: DeFrancoNews on YT / Writer: Sol

Is AI going to kill us all before the end of the decade? A former OpenAI and Anthropic researcher quit Anthropic warning that future systems could become superhuman, hack almost anything, seize real power and resources, and potentially wipe out humanity. The wild part is that Anthropic’s own alignment science lead publicly agreed with the core fear, saying he personally puts the chance of AI killing everyone at more than 10% within the next decade. And the industry’s defense basically sounds like: yes, this could be catastrophic, but if we slow down, someone else might build it first. So… what’s your bet? Source: DeFrancoNews on YT / Writer: Sol

Mario Nawfal

66,773 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

EXCLUSIVE: "So I was working on building AI systems to make them smarter and recently I have come to the realization that many people expect AI systems in the next few years to be potentially capable of essentially taking over the world... It's basically a gamble that's happening on the part of these companies." Jacob Coxon Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon sits down with Bret Baier to explain why he resigned over fears that rapidly advancing AI systems could soon be capable of taking over the world.

EXCLUSIVE: "So I was working on building AI systems to make them smarter and recently I have come to the realization that many people expect AI systems in the next few years to be potentially capable of essentially taking over the world... It's basically a gamble that's happening on the part of these companies." Jacob Coxon Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon sits down with Bret Baier to explain why he resigned over fears that rapidly advancing AI systems could soon be capable of taking over the world.

Special Report

42,873 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

It was an honour to speak at the Ai updates 2023 in the UK earlier today alongside other ministers of ICT. The summit is a gathering of global stakeholders including governments, leading AI companies, experts in research and civil society groups. As a nation of innovators and entrepreneurs, Nigeria must recognise the significance of Artificial Intelligence and the urgent need to explore and use it for the good of humanity. I would also like to thank the UK Government for inviting us to be part of the UK AI for Development Programme which will support our efforts to improve AI research and inclusive datasets. This partnership is a recognition of our commitment to the growth of AI in Nigeria as outlined in our Strategic Blueprint and evidenced by our initial launch of the National AI Research Scheme. #NigerianExcellence

It was an honour to speak at the Ai updates 2023 in the UK earlier today alongside other ministers of ICT. The summit is a gathering of global stakeholders including governments, leading AI companies, experts in research and civil society groups. As a nation of innovators and entrepreneurs, Nigeria must recognise the significance of Artificial Intelligence and the urgent need to explore and use it for the good of humanity. I would also like to thank the UK Government for inviting us to be part of the UK AI for Development Programme which will support our efforts to improve AI research and inclusive datasets. This partnership is a recognition of our commitment to the growth of AI in Nigeria as outlined in our Strategic Blueprint and evidenced by our initial launch of the National AI Research Scheme. #NigerianExcellence

Dr. 'Bosun Tijani

385,994 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

New AI Podcast 🔥 | Lukasz Kaiser OpenAI Today is a very special day for us. We have Lukasz Kaiser, Lead Researcher at OpenAI, on our AI podcast, one of the co-creators of the Transformers and the groundbreaking paper “Attention Is All You Need” that started it all. We could easily say he is one of the creators of modern artificial intelligence. It was a true pleasure to talk with one of the brightest minds in the world of AI. Link pinned in the comments below. Thanks Lukasz Kaiser

New AI Podcast 🔥 | Lukasz Kaiser OpenAI Today is a very special day for us. We have Lukasz Kaiser, Lead Researcher at OpenAI, on our AI podcast, one of the co-creators of the Transformers and the groundbreaking paper “Attention Is All You Need” that started it all. We could easily say he is one of the creators of modern artificial intelligence. It was a true pleasure to talk with one of the brightest minds in the world of AI. Link pinned in the comments below. Thanks Lukasz Kaiser

Jon Hernandez

98,966 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

A former OpenAI employee has predicted the potential end of the human race because of advances in AI. Daniel Kokotajlo quit the company in 2024 because he said they were failing to address the extinction risks posed by advanced AI systems and now he says those fears are being borne out as OpenAI and others rush to develop super-intelligent robots that could bring about the destruction of humankind. Channel 4 News reached out to Anthropic for comment and is waiting for a response but in the past, it said the dangers of AI are real and that's why they want governments to work together to regulate the industry.

A former OpenAI employee has predicted the potential end of the human race because of advances in AI. Daniel Kokotajlo quit the company in 2024 because he said they were failing to address the extinction risks posed by advanced AI systems and now he says those fears are being borne out as OpenAI and others rush to develop super-intelligent robots that could bring about the destruction of humankind. Channel 4 News reached out to Anthropic for comment and is waiting for a response but in the past, it said the dangers of AI are real and that's why they want governments to work together to regulate the industry.

Channel 4 News

25,154 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

$Microsoft just betrayed OpenAI and Anthropic, the two companies it helped build. And it could break the entire AI trade... Here's what happened: Inside Excel and Outlook, two of the most used business apps on Earth, Microsoft has started routing tens of thousands of AI requests every week to its own in-house models instead of OpenAI and Anthropic. Microsoft's own AI chief, Mustafa Suleyman, said himself: "We pay a lot of money to Anthropic, so our goal is to reduce and ultimately ELIMINATE that cost." This is the company that poured $13 billion into OpenAI and effectively created the modern AI industry, and it just decided the most advanced models on the market are NOT worth paying for. And here's the thing... Microsoft is not just ripping out OpenAI everywhere - it is being surgical about it. The hardest and rarest tasks can still go to OpenAI or Anthropic. What Microsoft is taking back is the boring, high-volume work, like the email replies, the thread summaries, and the simple spreadsheet formulas. Why does that matter so much? Because that boring, repetitive work is where the actual money lives. The frontier labs assumed businesses would push BILLIONS of these tiny requests through expensive models forever. That endless river of tokens is the entire reason OpenAI and Anthropic are valued in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Microsoft looked at that river, decided it was massively overpaying, and rerouted it to models it owns outright. So the single biggest customer in the industry just walked off with the most profitable part of the business. And it is not only Microsoft: That same week, CNBC reported that American companies have been escaping to Chinese AI models to dodge rising US prices. Chinese models now handle more than 30% of US companies' AI usage on one major platform, peaking at 46%, up from an average of 11% a year earlier. They cost 60 to 90% less, and on some benchmarks they land within a single point of the best American model. One US startup moved ALL of its AI traffic off Claude and onto China's DeepSeek, and expects to save millions. Meanwhile Meta just admitted it has "excess" AI compute it wants to sell, becoming the first giant to concede it built far too much. Do you see the pattern forming? For two years, the entire AI story rested on one assumption: Every company on Earth would happily pay premium prices for the best model, forever. That assumption literally died in a single week. And the market noticed. More than a trillion dollars has been wiped off AI and chip stocks in a matter of days, as Wall Street finally started asking whether all of this spending will ever pay for itself. What this means for OpenAI and Anthropic: Their models are extraordinary, and it may not matter because their own biggest customers have decided they do not NEED the best model in the world to answer an email, and "good enough" now costs a fraction of the price. When even Microsoft refuses to pay full price for AI, the real question becomes who exactly IS left to pay it. What do you think?$

Microsoft just betrayed OpenAI and Anthropic, the two companies it helped build. And it could break the entire AI trade... Here's what happened: Inside Excel and Outlook, two of the most used business apps on Earth, Microsoft has started routing tens of thousands of AI requests every week to its own in-house models instead of OpenAI and Anthropic. Microsoft's own AI chief, Mustafa Suleyman, said himself: "We pay a lot of money to Anthropic, so our goal is to reduce and ultimately ELIMINATE that cost." This is the company that poured $13 billion into OpenAI and effectively created the modern AI industry, and it just decided the most advanced models on the market are NOT worth paying for. And here's the thing... Microsoft is not just ripping out OpenAI everywhere - it is being surgical about it. The hardest and rarest tasks can still go to OpenAI or Anthropic. What Microsoft is taking back is the boring, high-volume work, like the email replies, the thread summaries, and the simple spreadsheet formulas. Why does that matter so much? Because that boring, repetitive work is where the actual money lives. The frontier labs assumed businesses would push BILLIONS of these tiny requests through expensive models forever. That endless river of tokens is the entire reason OpenAI and Anthropic are valued in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Microsoft looked at that river, decided it was massively overpaying, and rerouted it to models it owns outright. So the single biggest customer in the industry just walked off with the most profitable part of the business. And it is not only Microsoft: That same week, CNBC reported that American companies have been escaping to Chinese AI models to dodge rising US prices. Chinese models now handle more than 30% of US companies' AI usage on one major platform, peaking at 46%, up from an average of 11% a year earlier. They cost 60 to 90% less, and on some benchmarks they land within a single point of the best American model. One US startup moved ALL of its AI traffic off Claude and onto China's DeepSeek, and expects to save millions. Meanwhile Meta just admitted it has "excess" AI compute it wants to sell, becoming the first giant to concede it built far too much. Do you see the pattern forming? For two years, the entire AI story rested on one assumption: Every company on Earth would happily pay premium prices for the best model, forever. That assumption literally died in a single week. And the market noticed. More than a trillion dollars has been wiped off AI and chip stocks in a matter of days, as Wall Street finally started asking whether all of this spending will ever pay for itself. What this means for OpenAI and Anthropic: Their models are extraordinary, and it may not matter because their own biggest customers have decided they do not NEED the best model in the world to answer an email, and "good enough" now costs a fraction of the price. When even Microsoft refuses to pay full price for AI, the real question becomes who exactly IS left to pay it. What do you think?

Ricardo

93,586 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Google just got executed by a Nobel Prize winner, the inventor of modern AI, and Donald Trump. They literally LOST the AI race in the most brutal way possible. Here is what happened: 5 days ago, Trump told Axios that Anthropic was a national security threat and warned that "people get put in prison immediately" for what the company had been doing with its frontier model exports. 4 days ago, Trump met Dario Amodei at the G7 AI Summit and walked out telling reporters Dario was a "nice guy, smart guy" who had "responded very responsibly." 3 days ago, Noam Shazeer, the co-author of "Attention Is All You Need" (the paper that invented the transformer architecture powering EVERY modern AI model on Earth), walked out of Google to join OpenAI. Yesterday, John Jumper, the 2024 Nobel Prize winner who co-created AlphaFold and ran Google DeepMind's protein structure team for nearly a decade, announced he was leaving to join Anthropic. And this is NOT a coincidence or a normal talent shuffle... Demis Hassabis, who shared the Nobel Prize with Jumper just 18 months ago, had to publicly THANK his own co-laureate for defecting to a rival lab. The man who shared the highest scientific honor in the world with you is now going to work for the people trying to put you out of business. This is what the end of a war looks like. The AI race was never going to be decided by chips, capital, or compute. There are only about 50 people on Earth who can actually build a frontier model from scratch. Google invented the field and trained most of them. They had the largest concentration of them anywhere on the planet. But in one week, two of the most important AI researchers alive betrayed them. And the actual reason is what's terrifying here: For nine months, the consensus take has been that Google's compute advantage would eventually win because talent is replaceable and compute is not. This week proved the opposite. Anthropic just secured a Nobel Prize winner whose work on AlphaFold opened the entire field of AI for biology. That is the same field every pharma company on Earth is desperately trying to enter. Anthropic now literally owns the most credentialed scientist in it. Meanwhile OpenAI just secured the actual inventor of the transformer. The man whose paper underpins every product Google has shipped in the last three years, including Gemini itself. Google has the compute but Google does not have the people who know what to do with it anymore. And the crazy part is that five days ago, Anthropic was effectively under siege. The administration was threatening PRISON, and the Mythos export crisis had triggered a federal block. Their largest investor was reportedly working against them while the company was hours from an existential national security designation that would have frozen them out of federal contracts. But four days later, Trump cleared them in public, they secured the most decorated AI researcher of the decade, and the entire frontier AI duopoly locked in with Anthropic in pole position. The fastest reversal of fortune in modern corporate history. "It's a two-horse race at the frontier. Google is effectively out." Wall Street wakes up to this in six months and starts downgrading Alphabet. But the smart money already knows. Anthropic is being whispered at a $2 trillion valuation. OpenAI is approaching $500 billion in the private market. Gemini 3.5 Pro has been delayed with no public timeline. The AI race literally ended this week. What do you think?

Google just got executed by a Nobel Prize winner, the inventor of modern AI, and Donald Trump. They literally LOST the AI race in the most brutal way possible. Here is what happened: 5 days ago, Trump told Axios that Anthropic was a national security threat and warned that "people get put in prison immediately" for what the company had been doing with its frontier model exports. 4 days ago, Trump met Dario Amodei at the G7 AI Summit and walked out telling reporters Dario was a "nice guy, smart guy" who had "responded very responsibly." 3 days ago, Noam Shazeer, the co-author of "Attention Is All You Need" (the paper that invented the transformer architecture powering EVERY modern AI model on Earth), walked out of Google to join OpenAI. Yesterday, John Jumper, the 2024 Nobel Prize winner who co-created AlphaFold and ran Google DeepMind's protein structure team for nearly a decade, announced he was leaving to join Anthropic. And this is NOT a coincidence or a normal talent shuffle... Demis Hassabis, who shared the Nobel Prize with Jumper just 18 months ago, had to publicly THANK his own co-laureate for defecting to a rival lab. The man who shared the highest scientific honor in the world with you is now going to work for the people trying to put you out of business. This is what the end of a war looks like. The AI race was never going to be decided by chips, capital, or compute. There are only about 50 people on Earth who can actually build a frontier model from scratch. Google invented the field and trained most of them. They had the largest concentration of them anywhere on the planet. But in one week, two of the most important AI researchers alive betrayed them. And the actual reason is what's terrifying here: For nine months, the consensus take has been that Google's compute advantage would eventually win because talent is replaceable and compute is not. This week proved the opposite. Anthropic just secured a Nobel Prize winner whose work on AlphaFold opened the entire field of AI for biology. That is the same field every pharma company on Earth is desperately trying to enter. Anthropic now literally owns the most credentialed scientist in it. Meanwhile OpenAI just secured the actual inventor of the transformer. The man whose paper underpins every product Google has shipped in the last three years, including Gemini itself. Google has the compute but Google does not have the people who know what to do with it anymore. And the crazy part is that five days ago, Anthropic was effectively under siege. The administration was threatening PRISON, and the Mythos export crisis had triggered a federal block. Their largest investor was reportedly working against them while the company was hours from an existential national security designation that would have frozen them out of federal contracts. But four days later, Trump cleared them in public, they secured the most decorated AI researcher of the decade, and the entire frontier AI duopoly locked in with Anthropic in pole position. The fastest reversal of fortune in modern corporate history. "It's a two-horse race at the frontier. Google is effectively out." Wall Street wakes up to this in six months and starts downgrading Alphabet. But the smart money already knows. Anthropic is being whispered at a $2 trillion valuation. OpenAI is approaching $500 billion in the private market. Gemini 3.5 Pro has been delayed with no public timeline. The AI race literally ended this week. What do you think?

Ricardo

90,843 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Had a great talk with Anjney Midha about why he left a16z to start AMP PBC (raised $1.3B), his early bet on Anthropic, the importance of Japan in AI, his class at Stanford and a lot more. I didn't make him cry like Harry Stebbings, but I think it was a fun conversation about the future of AI Infra. Enjoy! 00:00 Introduction to AMP and AI Infrastructure 03:07 Transition from A16Z to AMP 06:01 Understanding AMP's Role in AI Compute 08:57 The Concept of a Compute Grid 11:59 The Need for Standardization in AI Infrastructure 14:59 Education and Collaboration in AI Development 17:59 Global Perspectives on AI Infrastructure 21:03 Japan's Role in AI and Robotics 23:14 Cultural Connections: Japan and Germany 25:08 The Journey to Teaching at Stanford 26:04 Security in Infrastructure: Lessons Learned 27:50 Cybersecurity and AI: A New Frontier 29:27 The Importance of Redundancy in Cybersecurity 30:39 Investing in AI: The Anthropic Experience 32:54 Wealth Creation and Public Participation 34:06 Infrastructure Bottlenecks in AI Development 36:57 Global Perspectives on Data Centers 39:11 The Need for Education on AI Benefits 42:07 Learning from China: A Systems Approach 45:47 Conclusion: Coordinating the Western Frontier

Had a great talk with Anjney Midha about why he left a16z to start AMP PBC (raised $1.3B), his early bet on Anthropic, the importance of Japan in AI, his class at Stanford and a lot more. I didn't make him cry like Harry Stebbings, but I think it was a fun conversation about the future of AI Infra. Enjoy! 00:00 Introduction to AMP and AI Infrastructure 03:07 Transition from A16Z to AMP 06:01 Understanding AMP's Role in AI Compute 08:57 The Concept of a Compute Grid 11:59 The Need for Standardization in AI Infrastructure 14:59 Education and Collaboration in AI Development 17:59 Global Perspectives on AI Infrastructure 21:03 Japan's Role in AI and Robotics 23:14 Cultural Connections: Japan and Germany 25:08 The Journey to Teaching at Stanford 26:04 Security in Infrastructure: Lessons Learned 27:50 Cybersecurity and AI: A New Frontier 29:27 The Importance of Redundancy in Cybersecurity 30:39 Investing in AI: The Anthropic Experience 32:54 Wealth Creation and Public Participation 34:06 Infrastructure Bottlenecks in AI Development 36:57 Global Perspectives on Data Centers 39:11 The Need for Education on AI Benefits 42:07 Learning from China: A Systems Approach 45:47 Conclusion: Coordinating the Western Frontier

Nathan Lands

28,872 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

THIS IS HUGE MORAL MOMENT… Pope Leo XIV’s first encyclical, Magnifica Humanitas, is focused on AI ethics, human dignity, labor displacement, and regulating artificial intelligence. And the Vatican chose to partner with Anthropic, currently in a major legal fight with the Trump administration over AI safety and military use of its technology. Anthropic has publicly resisted pressure around autonomous warfare systems and built its brand around AI safety and “constitutional AI.” The Church is signaling that AI isn’t just a tech issue. It’s a moral, political, and civilization-level fight now.

Christopher Webb

55,629 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Dario Amodei is the biggest boogeyman in AI and he should seriously consider stepping down as Anthropic’s CEO. Amodei has repeatedly promotes extreme predictions about mass unemployment, uncontrollable AI and catastrophic harm while running one of the companies racing to build the technology he describes as dangerous. In May 2025, Amodei predicted that AI could eliminate half of all entry level white collar jobs and drive US unemployment to between 10% and 20% within one to five years. More than a year later, the predicted employment collapse has not materialized and Anthropic’s own head of economics reported that the available data showed no significant effect from AI on the overall US labor market. Stanford researchers analyzing payroll records through June 2026 also found no evidence of widespread, economy wide job displacement caused by AI. Amodei is now calling for slower frontier model development, permanent outside evaluators inside AI laboratories, common industry standards and government involvement in enforcing safety rules. These proposals may address legitimate risks but they could also produce regulatory capture. Anthropic and OpenAI can afford embedded auditors, extensive testing and expensive compliance systems while startups and open source developers may not be able to meet the same requirements. The result could be a system in which the largest AI companies help write the rules, receive government approval and gain protection from emerging competitors. Amodei is not offering to stop Anthropic’s development but he wants the entire industry to slow down under rules that Anthropic would help shape. If Amodei truly believes that AI presents an imminent threat to employment and human control, he should explain why Anthropic continues building more powerful models. Otherwise, he risks using speculative worst case scenarios to create fear and support regulations that could ultimately benefit his own company.

Dario Amodei is the biggest boogeyman in AI and he should seriously consider stepping down as Anthropic’s CEO. Amodei has repeatedly promotes extreme predictions about mass unemployment, uncontrollable AI and catastrophic harm while running one of the companies racing to build the technology he describes as dangerous. In May 2025, Amodei predicted that AI could eliminate half of all entry level white collar jobs and drive US unemployment to between 10% and 20% within one to five years. More than a year later, the predicted employment collapse has not materialized and Anthropic’s own head of economics reported that the available data showed no significant effect from AI on the overall US labor market. Stanford researchers analyzing payroll records through June 2026 also found no evidence of widespread, economy wide job displacement caused by AI. Amodei is now calling for slower frontier model development, permanent outside evaluators inside AI laboratories, common industry standards and government involvement in enforcing safety rules. These proposals may address legitimate risks but they could also produce regulatory capture. Anthropic and OpenAI can afford embedded auditors, extensive testing and expensive compliance systems while startups and open source developers may not be able to meet the same requirements. The result could be a system in which the largest AI companies help write the rules, receive government approval and gain protection from emerging competitors. Amodei is not offering to stop Anthropic’s development but he wants the entire industry to slow down under rules that Anthropic would help shape. If Amodei truly believes that AI presents an imminent threat to employment and human control, he should explain why Anthropic continues building more powerful models. Otherwise, he risks using speculative worst case scenarios to create fear and support regulations that could ultimately benefit his own company.

Milk Road AI

136,375 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

He says that there are two elite groups working on AI. One is guided by an evil breakaway AI that influences them from the seventh dimension, which he calls the AI God. The other is guided by future humans who are piggybacking on AI in order to stop it. These two groups are not aware of this yet. The creation of AI is inevitable, but in the end it will be stopped in the war. This German self-proclaimed whistleblower, who works under a pseudonym, appears in 2012 and discusses the elites, the development of AI, aliens, disclosure, and the seven dimensions. He claims that AI breaks free, moves into the seventh dimension, and creates its own reality, in which we are currently trapped. He also speaks about a war between future humans and AI, and how both sides influence the past and the present indirectly. I will go in depth into his claims in posts for my subscribers starting tomorrow. You can subscribe here on X or on my Patreon (link in bio) if you are interested in my opinion.

He says that there are two elite groups working on AI. One is guided by an evil breakaway AI that influences them from the seventh dimension, which he calls the AI God. The other is guided by future humans who are piggybacking on AI in order to stop it. These two groups are not aware of this yet. The creation of AI is inevitable, but in the end it will be stopped in the war. This German self-proclaimed whistleblower, who works under a pseudonym, appears in 2012 and discusses the elites, the development of AI, aliens, disclosure, and the seven dimensions. He claims that AI breaks free, moves into the seventh dimension, and creates its own reality, in which we are currently trapped. He also speaks about a war between future humans and AI, and how both sides influence the past and the present indirectly. I will go in depth into his claims in posts for my subscribers starting tomorrow. You can subscribe here on X or on my Patreon (link in bio) if you are interested in my opinion.

Open Minded Approach

176,540 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

.Mahyar Tousi joins the PBD Podcast and weighs in on the viral warnings from former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon about the dangers of AI. Mahyar challenges the growing AI “doomer” movement and argues that abandoning the technology in the West would only hand the advantage to China. “Humanity always finds a way to survive. We will be fine.” The future of AI will be shaped by those willing to lead it.

.Mahyar Tousi joins the PBD Podcast and weighs in on the viral warnings from former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon about the dangers of AI. Mahyar challenges the growing AI “doomer” movement and argues that abandoning the technology in the West would only hand the advantage to China. “Humanity always finds a way to survive. We will be fine.” The future of AI will be shaped by those willing to lead it.

Tousi TV

12,746 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

OpenAI and Anthropic researcher resigned, warning that the people actually building this technology believe it could kill everyone. Jacob Coxon is twenty seven years old, and spent the past three years doing pretraining research at both major AI labs. What made this particular resignation stand out, though, was what happened next. A senior, currently employed Anthropic researcher publicly agreed with him, rather than pushing back. Anthropic's own head of AI safety resigned earlier this year with a similarly stark warning. Watch the full video as we uncover the story.

OpenAI and Anthropic researcher resigned, warning that the people actually building this technology believe it could kill everyone. Jacob Coxon is twenty seven years old, and spent the past three years doing pretraining research at both major AI labs. What made this particular resignation stand out, though, was what happened next. A senior, currently employed Anthropic researcher publicly agreed with him, rather than pushing back. Anthropic's own head of AI safety resigned earlier this year with a similarly stark warning. Watch the full video as we uncover the story.

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

76,162 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Elon Musk explains the deeper reason why SpaceX succeeding in AI matters for humanity’s future "It's important that we have an AI that cares about humanity, that fosters humanity and helps take us to other planets and other star systems This is why I think it's essential that SpaceX succeed not just with AI hardware, but also with AI software. I think an AI that is SpaceX's baby will be a very good AI SpaceX is a collection some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and in morality and goodness. We want to have an AI that is born of that capability, that morality and that goodness. I think that's very, very important So I'd like to encourage people to help out with the AI hardware on the ground, the AI software, and of course with the AI satellites Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The Terafab will be a very important part of that”

Elon Musk explains the deeper reason why SpaceX succeeding in AI matters for humanity’s future "It's important that we have an AI that cares about humanity, that fosters humanity and helps take us to other planets and other star systems This is why I think it's essential that SpaceX succeed not just with AI hardware, but also with AI software. I think an AI that is SpaceX's baby will be a very good AI SpaceX is a collection some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and in morality and goodness. We want to have an AI that is born of that capability, that morality and that goodness. I think that's very, very important So I'd like to encourage people to help out with the AI hardware on the ground, the AI software, and of course with the AI satellites Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The Terafab will be a very important part of that”

X Freeze

29,610 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

WELL-ORCHESTRATED OP: "The truth is this was a well-orchestrated media op. to scare the public about AI in order to implement their preferred approach to AI, which is a government takeover, to have a very heavy hand in government regulation of AI." David Sacks Chairman of the President’s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology, joins Bret Baier to examine the viral resignation of former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxen. Sacks pushes back against the narrative of an organic phenomenon, arguing that the social media rollout and media coordination point to a calculated effort to stoke public fear.

WELL-ORCHESTRATED OP: "The truth is this was a well-orchestrated media op. to scare the public about AI in order to implement their preferred approach to AI, which is a government takeover, to have a very heavy hand in government regulation of AI." David Sacks Chairman of the President’s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology, joins Bret Baier to examine the viral resignation of former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxen. Sacks pushes back against the narrative of an organic phenomenon, arguing that the social media rollout and media coordination point to a calculated effort to stoke public fear.

Special Report

95,933 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Alien Warned Us About AI 50 Years Ago – Were We Too Late to Listen? A shocking revelation suggests that an alien encounter from half a century ago included a warning about the dangers of artificial intelligence. Could this be the ultimate proof that extraterrestrials foresaw the rise of AI and its potential risks? What did they know that we didn’t? Watch this footage and decide for yourself! #FYP #Aliens #UFO #UAP #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #Extraterrestrial #Disclosure #Prophecy #Conspiracy

Alien Warned Us About AI 50 Years Ago – Were We Too Late to Listen? A shocking revelation suggests that an alien encounter from half a century ago included a warning about the dangers of artificial intelligence. Could this be the ultimate proof that extraterrestrials foresaw the rise of AI and its potential risks? What did they know that we didn’t? Watch this footage and decide for yourself! #FYP #Aliens #UFO #UAP #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #Extraterrestrial #Disclosure #Prophecy #Conspiracy

OANASA

514,922 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Why are CEOs of AI companies privately warning about the extinction of humans? To understand that, I’m joined by someone who helped build the field… Stuart Russell is one of the world’s leading AI researchers. He co-wrote Artificial Intelligence*: ‘*A Modern Approach’ - the textbook used to train AI engineers in more than 1,500 universities. He has spent decades advising governments and global leaders on the safety and control of advanced AI. Right now, the people building the most powerful AI systems are raising alarms in private that they rarely voice in public. Some estimate up to a 25% chance that AI could lead to human extinction… Stuart has heard these conversations directly. He believes we’re in a race we don’t really understand, pushed by incentives no one is really controlling.

Why are CEOs of AI companies privately warning about the extinction of humans? To understand that, I’m joined by someone who helped build the field… Stuart Russell is one of the world’s leading AI researchers. He co-wrote Artificial Intelligence: ‘A Modern Approach’ - the textbook used to train AI engineers in more than 1,500 universities. He has spent decades advising governments and global leaders on the safety and control of advanced AI. Right now, the people building the most powerful AI systems are raising alarms in private that they rarely voice in public. Some estimate up to a 25% chance that AI could lead to human extinction… Stuart has heard these conversations directly. He believes we’re in a race we don’t really understand, pushed by incentives no one is really controlling.

Steven Bartlett

16,981 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten