Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Definitely not his first interaction with law enforcement
697,542 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)
9 Comments
Dum dum probably meant to cite the 4th amendment 😂 Interestingly enough, he doesn’t have to ID as a passenger unless he’s been suspected of a crime. Judging by his behavior, he probably talked himself into one.
When he said that I was like wait a second 😂
So illegals don't need an ID, but citizens do... got it!
They're not allowed to force a passenger to ID themselves unless they've committed a crime. What crime did he commit? It was also the 4th ammendment that he should have referred to.
4th admendment. And cops are always trying to ID passenger. Actually he doesn't have a right to ID him and he also has free speech to say what he wants .this cop is a tyrant
The third 😂🤣😂🤣🤦♂️
Just throwing random numbers out there 😂
BackTheBlue though...right?
Totally
![Joe Borelli: “Are you allowed to interfere with law enforcement?… If he would've stood on the sidewalk with a sign or with a camera, he would not be dead right now. But that's not what he did. He interfered with law enforcement.” Abby Phillip: “What was it about his conduct that you think was illegal or whatever it was?” Joe Borelli: “In close proximity, in contact with a law enforcement official.” Abby Phillip: “ But is he allowed to record what law enforcement is doing?” Joe Borelli: “Yes, from a safe distance. You're not allowed to actually be—“ Abby Phillip: “Okay. So, based on the video that you saw, was he at a safe distance?” Joe Borelli: “No... and he should have complied [with law enforcement].” Correct!](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2016881906684416469/amplify_video_thumb/2016881777433063424/img/t1NebHgUdo3Fp7Zl.jpg)
