Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

“DEI logically does not work without crossing that first principle of the definition of racism.” Warren Smith says objective reasoning gives us a way to cut through ideology and determine whether an argument actually holds up. “If racism is treating people differently based on the color of their skin,... show more

Jan Jekielek

217,258 subscribers

13,213 views • 5 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 Comments

Jan Jekielek5 days ago

I sat down with @WTSmith17 to discuss how logical reasoning can expose misinformation, propaganda, and powerful narratives in real time. We also explore the Socratic method, postmodernism, social contagion, objective truth, and the ideas behind his book, A Mind of Your Own.

Huey P's Student4 days ago

This stupid argument doesn't fool anyone Bcuz you can't correct the mistakes of the past w/o corrective measures Racism makes you folks totally illogical and evil

saying something4 days ago

To be straight up fair, why wouldn't you correct a racism issue in our society when you have direct evidence of people being harmed, especially in employment? This is why we have 'desparate impact' measurements & quotas. Denying racism & seeing its effect is dishonestly corrupt !

Phantammeron2 days ago

Multiple Civil Rights Acts 60 years ago corrected all this. It has been illegal to descriminate since then in America. We’ve also had numerous Supreme Court cases enforcing it. So if you can find classical descrimination over minorities, then you should sue! But notice, nobody does today. Why? There is no racism left. The fact is, EEOC director has said it is illegal to consider race in hiring, but the society through DEI is doing it anyway. This is why many orgs are suing companies over reverse descrimination today. That is the only true social injustice left.

Heather Gulliver2 days ago

Warren Smith is such a great educator. Strange institution that chucked him out.

Manderådet3 days ago

This line of logical reasoning is distinctly masculine. Most women won't buy it because it doesn't feel right...

Scott Dog4 days ago

DEI is a prima facie example of both institutional racism and sexism.

Antony Booth4 days ago

The argument where you stated: lowering standards, using airline pilots as an example, was weak because it was not fully qualified. Airlines should hire the best pilots & have a minimum standard. Race based hiring wouldn't mean lower minimum, but the best available aren't hired.

Related Videos

Oli Dugmore, "Most fair minded British people would accept the spirit of what Diane Abbott was trying to say" "If you present as an ethnic minority you experience, visibly, you experience racism differently" "It's not to say that Jewish people do not experience racism, or that Irish people don't experience racism" "But if your skin is a different colour to other people, the way racism manifests against you is different" "And I think most fair minded people would accept that point" Oli Dugmore #Newsnight

Oli Dugmore, "Most fair minded British people would accept the spirit of what Diane Abbott was trying to say" "If you present as an ethnic minority you experience, visibly, you experience racism differently" "It's not to say that Jewish people do not experience racism, or that Irish people don't experience racism" "But if your skin is a different colour to other people, the way racism manifests against you is different" "And I think most fair minded people would accept that point" Oli Dugmore #Newsnight

Farrukh

110,133 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk: We should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it’s called If “wokism” means racism based on sex, gender, or identity, and DEI is simply racism rebranded, then yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against It is entirely possible to be racist against white people, black people, Asians, or anyone else And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called DEI and wokism essentially advocate racism and sexism; that is wrong They are also anti-meritocratic. So we should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work That should be the only way that people succeed not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory So we need a meritocratic society, and we need freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is only relevant if the people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like That is the only time freedom of speech is relevant

Elon Musk: We should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it’s called If “wokism” means racism based on sex, gender, or identity, and DEI is simply racism rebranded, then yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against It is entirely possible to be racist against white people, black people, Asians, or anyone else And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called DEI and wokism essentially advocate racism and sexism; that is wrong They are also anti-meritocratic. So we should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work That should be the only way that people succeed not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory So we need a meritocratic society, and we need freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is only relevant if the people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like That is the only time freedom of speech is relevant

X Freeze

31,865 views • 8 months ago

Tom Homan says ICE protesters can be charged under the category of Domestic Terrorists “You look up definition of terrorism. Is there violence, is there threat of violence based on an ideology that wants to change the way the government does what we do? — Definition of terrorism”

Tom Homan says ICE protesters can be charged under the category of Domestic Terrorists “You look up definition of terrorism. Is there violence, is there threat of violence based on an ideology that wants to change the way the government does what we do? — Definition of terrorism”

Wall Street Apes

23,542 views • 8 months ago

Elon Musk: "We should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it’s called" If 'wokism' means judging people by race, gender, or identity - that's racism If DEI means giving advantages based on skin color - that's racism rebranded Racism against white people is still racism Racism against black people is still racism There are no exceptions We need a meritocracy - where people rise based on talent and hard work, not identity politics And free speech only means something when people you disagree with are allowed to speak

Elon Musk: "We should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it’s called" If 'wokism' means judging people by race, gender, or identity - that's racism If DEI means giving advantages based on skin color - that's racism rebranded Racism against white people is still racism Racism against black people is still racism There are no exceptions We need a meritocracy - where people rise based on talent and hard work, not identity politics And free speech only means something when people you disagree with are allowed to speak

X Freeze

123,659 views • 5 months ago

This is one of the most insidious and destructive tenets of critical race theory—the teaching that if you, as a white person, have ANY type of reaction to CRT dogma, other than full-throated acceptance, that is yet further PROOF of your racism. If you say “I’m not racist,” it’s proof of racism. If you get upset or defensive, it’s proof of racism. If you push back in any way or—God forbid—shun the Church of CRT, it’s proof of racism. It goes without saying, but ideology like that 👆leaves no room for free speech, no room for discourse, no room for finding a workable solution that incorporates all Americans, no room for experiences or voices of anyone who’s not black. It ONLY serves to divide us further, because it deals with perceived racism by inflicting…additional racism. But of course, that’s precisely the point: As Kendi states in his trash HOW TO BE AN ANTI-RACIST, “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.” Anyone with a brain and a soul can see that 👆is a recipe for CONTINUOUS and NEVER-ENDING discrimination. But my guess is that’s precisely the point.

This is one of the most insidious and destructive tenets of critical race theory—the teaching that if you, as a white person, have ANY type of reaction to CRT dogma, other than full-throated acceptance, that is yet further PROOF of your racism. If you say “I’m not racist,” it’s proof of racism. If you get upset or defensive, it’s proof of racism. If you push back in any way or—God forbid—shun the Church of CRT, it’s proof of racism. It goes without saying, but ideology like that 👆leaves no room for free speech, no room for discourse, no room for finding a workable solution that incorporates all Americans, no room for experiences or voices of anyone who’s not black. It ONLY serves to divide us further, because it deals with perceived racism by inflicting…additional racism. But of course, that’s precisely the point: As Kendi states in his trash HOW TO BE AN ANTI-RACIST, “The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination.” Anyone with a brain and a soul can see that 👆is a recipe for CONTINUOUS and NEVER-ENDING discrimination. But my guess is that’s precisely the point.

Natalie Jean Beisner

491,090 views • 3 years ago

Warren Buffett’s response when asked if he has an opinion on the stock market: “Charlie and I never have an opinion about the market because it wouldn’t be any good… If we think a business is attractive, it wouldn’t be very foolish for us to not take action on that because we thought something about what the market was going to do or anything of that sort… To give up something that you do know and is profitable for something that you don’t know and won’t know because of that, it doesn’t make any sense to us.” ___ Video: CNBC Warren Buffett Archive (1994)

Warren Buffett’s response when asked if he has an opinion on the stock market: “Charlie and I never have an opinion about the market because it wouldn’t be any good… If we think a business is attractive, it wouldn’t be very foolish for us to not take action on that because we thought something about what the market was going to do or anything of that sort… To give up something that you do know and is profitable for something that you don’t know and won’t know because of that, it doesn’t make any sense to us.” ___ Video: CNBC Warren Buffett Archive (1994)

Dimitry Nakhla | Babylon Capital®

25,245 views • 7 months ago

Ben Shapiro: "No, Tucker Carlson, it is not an excuse to go silent on Candace's targeting of TPUSA or to mirror her bullshit…The same holds true of Megyn Kelly…That is a moral and logical absurdity."

Ben Shapiro: "No, Tucker Carlson, it is not an excuse to go silent on Candace's targeting of TPUSA or to mirror her bullshit…The same holds true of Megyn Kelly…That is a moral and logical absurdity."

The Bulwark

144,526 views • 9 months ago

They managed to convince an entire population that they’re somehow guilty and should be ashamed of their skin color. Racism against white people is the only kind of discrimination that’s allowed.

They managed to convince an entire population that they’re somehow guilty and should be ashamed of their skin color. Racism against white people is the only kind of discrimination that’s allowed.

Libs of TikTok

2,321,863 views • 2 years ago

As usual, leftists take clips out of context.. Charlie Kirk is talking about the consequences of DEI based hiring over merit based hiring: “If I see a see a Black Pilot, I’m gonna be like, I hope he’s qualified!” Other panelist: “And you’re wouldn’t have done that before!” Charlie Kirk: “No, that’s not who I am, that’s not what I believe!!” Again, for the thousandth time Charlie Kirk Explains, this time on Megyn Kelly’s podcast : “That’s not what I believe! But what it does, is it makes us the worst versions of ourselves Megyn, that’s the whole point of what I was saying. It’s that I now look at things through a hyper-racialized, diversity quota lens, Because of their massive insistence to try to hit these ridiculous racial hiring quotas. OF COURSE, I BELIEVE that ANYBODY of ANY SKIN COLOR, can become a QUALIFIED pilot ! That HAS NEVER BEEN MY CONTENTION, and it’s SILLY AND BIGOTED TO THINK OTHERWISE?! - “ Charlie Kirk in his own words, not the h@teful lies told by the left, (who obviously believes Black people can’t make it if they’re being judged by their skill, and not by their skin color), push through by removing the context of clips to trick their gullible base.

As usual, leftists take clips out of context.. Charlie Kirk is talking about the consequences of DEI based hiring over merit based hiring: “If I see a see a Black Pilot, I’m gonna be like, I hope he’s qualified!” Other panelist: “And you’re wouldn’t have done that before!” Charlie Kirk: “No, that’s not who I am, that’s not what I believe!!” Again, for the thousandth time Charlie Kirk Explains, this time on Megyn Kelly’s podcast : “That’s not what I believe! But what it does, is it makes us the worst versions of ourselves Megyn, that’s the whole point of what I was saying. It’s that I now look at things through a hyper-racialized, diversity quota lens, Because of their massive insistence to try to hit these ridiculous racial hiring quotas. OF COURSE, I BELIEVE that ANYBODY of ANY SKIN COLOR, can become a QUALIFIED pilot ! That HAS NEVER BEEN MY CONTENTION, and it’s SILLY AND BIGOTED TO THINK OTHERWISE?! - “ Charlie Kirk in his own words, not the h@teful lies told by the left, (who obviously believes Black people can’t make it if they’re being judged by their skill, and not by their skin color), push through by removing the context of clips to trick their gullible base.

Suzanne 🇺🇸♥️

115,713 views • 1 year ago

They call you racist, and think the conversation is over. News flash, this is not 1964 anymore. The American people are a lot smarter than that, and they’re not buying it. Because the reality is, people like me exist. What does that tell you? It tells you this country has made real progress. It tells you that millions of Americans are doing exactly what Martin Luther King Jr. called for, judging people not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. That’s not theory, that’s reality. But instead of celebrating that progress, some want to drag us backwards, into a system where race is everything, where success is assigned, where outcomes are engineered. That’s not empowerment, that’s limitation. The idea that someone can only succeed if a district is drawn for them, or if a box is checked for them, is an insult to the very people it claims to help. Here’s a better idea, be a great candidate. Work hard. Earn trust. Serve people. Put your name on the ballot and let voters decide.

They call you racist, and think the conversation is over. News flash, this is not 1964 anymore. The American people are a lot smarter than that, and they’re not buying it. Because the reality is, people like me exist. What does that tell you? It tells you this country has made real progress. It tells you that millions of Americans are doing exactly what Martin Luther King Jr. called for, judging people not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. That’s not theory, that’s reality. But instead of celebrating that progress, some want to drag us backwards, into a system where race is everything, where success is assigned, where outcomes are engineered. That’s not empowerment, that’s limitation. The idea that someone can only succeed if a district is drawn for them, or if a box is checked for them, is an insult to the very people it claims to help. Here’s a better idea, be a great candidate. Work hard. Earn trust. Serve people. Put your name on the ballot and let voters decide.

Wesley Hunt

267,670 views • 5 months ago

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard asserted that it is not the responsibility of US spy agencies to determine ‘what is and is not an imminent threat’ to the United States

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard asserted that it is not the responsibility of US spy agencies to determine ‘what is and is not an imminent threat’ to the United States

Reuters

146,888 views • 6 months ago

Elon Musk: ”DEI is simply racism rebranded. I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against. It is entirely possible to be racist against White people or Black people or Asians or anyone else. We should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called. DEI and wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism. That is wrong. They're also anti-meritocratic. We should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work. That should be the only way that people succeed, not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory.”

Elon Musk: ”DEI is simply racism rebranded. I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against. It is entirely possible to be racist against White people or Black people or Asians or anyone else. We should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called. DEI and wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism. That is wrong. They're also anti-meritocratic. We should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work. That should be the only way that people succeed, not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory.”

Taya Bass

30,711 views • 3 months ago

Warren Smith says the jurors in the Lindsey Clancy case overlooked a glaring logical flaw. The defense argued Clancy had no agency over her actions. But Smith says their own expert’s explanation undermined that very argument. “There was one witness that was brought in that was claimed to be the foremost expert who has dealt with more of these cases than anyone, brought by her lawyer.” “Something jumped out to me that seems like a logical contradiction.” “He claimed that the psychosis caused her to have an out-of-body experience where she had no agency, because agency is the question here.” “If she had agency, she would be responsible.” “A moment later, he goes on to explain literally her logical chain.” “Her reasoning, her rationale was that it would be better to take the kids with her into the afterlife.” “It would be more cruel to leave them behind.” “So we’re clearly seeing a rationalization, which to me directly contradicts the first claim.” “That does not make sense to me.” Smith says we already apply this logic when determining responsibility in cases involving alcohol. “Someone drinks alcohol, we still hold them responsible even though they could be blackout drunk and literally not remember it.” “But we still hold them responsible because there is this, well, you chose to drink.” “And what’s the alternative legally if we stop holding people responsible because they were blackout drunk?” “I don’t know why we’re not applying the same reasoning in this case.” Warren Smith

Warren Smith says the jurors in the Lindsey Clancy case overlooked a glaring logical flaw. The defense argued Clancy had no agency over her actions. But Smith says their own expert’s explanation undermined that very argument. “There was one witness that was brought in that was claimed to be the foremost expert who has dealt with more of these cases than anyone, brought by her lawyer.” “Something jumped out to me that seems like a logical contradiction.” “He claimed that the psychosis caused her to have an out-of-body experience where she had no agency, because agency is the question here.” “If she had agency, she would be responsible.” “A moment later, he goes on to explain literally her logical chain.” “Her reasoning, her rationale was that it would be better to take the kids with her into the afterlife.” “It would be more cruel to leave them behind.” “So we’re clearly seeing a rationalization, which to me directly contradicts the first claim.” “That does not make sense to me.” Smith says we already apply this logic when determining responsibility in cases involving alcohol. “Someone drinks alcohol, we still hold them responsible even though they could be blackout drunk and literally not remember it.” “But we still hold them responsible because there is this, well, you chose to drink.” “And what’s the alternative legally if we stop holding people responsible because they were blackout drunk?” “I don’t know why we’re not applying the same reasoning in this case.” Warren Smith

Jan Jekielek

14,601 views • 6 days ago

Elon Musk: DEI and Wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism; they're also anti-meritocratic. “If by wokeism, one means just like racism on the basis of sex and gender and other matters, which DEI is simply racism rebranded, then yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against. It is entirely possible to be racist against white people, black people, Asians, or anyone else. And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called. DEI and wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism. That is wrong. They're also anti-meritocratic. So we should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society, where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work. That should be the only way that people succeed, not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory. So we need a meritocratic society, and we need freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is only relevant if people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like. That is the only time freedom of speech is relevant. It can't be that the government is deciding what is or is not misinformation or disinformation, because then you get politics applying to those labels, and in fact, you simply get the suppression of freedom of speech.”

Elon Musk: DEI and Wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism; they're also anti-meritocratic. “If by wokeism, one means just like racism on the basis of sex and gender and other matters, which DEI is simply racism rebranded, then yes, I'm against racism and sexism, no matter who it's directed against. It is entirely possible to be racist against white people, black people, Asians, or anyone else. And we should really accept no racism or sexism in any form, no matter what it's called. DEI and wokeism essentially advocate racism and sexism. That is wrong. They're also anti-meritocratic. So we should really, in my view, have a meritocratic society, where people succeed as a function of their abilities and how hard they work. That should be the only way that people succeed, not through some arbitrary measures that are discriminatory. So we need a meritocratic society, and we need freedom of speech. And freedom of speech is only relevant if people you don't like are allowed to say things you don't like. That is the only time freedom of speech is relevant. It can't be that the government is deciding what is or is not misinformation or disinformation, because then you get politics applying to those labels, and in fact, you simply get the suppression of freedom of speech.”

Eva Fo𝕏 🦊 Claudius Nero's Legion

22,743 views • 9 months ago

Rachel Maddow says to Hillary Clinton "if bad actors tell us falsely that every election is stolen and that the only way an election is trustworthy is that if they come out on top of it, it tells you something not just about that person but it wounds us as a democracy in a way that’s hard to repair."

Rachel Maddow says to Hillary Clinton "if bad actors tell us falsely that every election is stolen and that the only way an election is trustworthy is that if they come out on top of it, it tells you something not just about that person but it wounds us as a democracy in a way that’s hard to repair."

Greg Price

3,195,253 views • 3 years ago

#RHOSLC after show! Angie says there are a couple of people in the group who need to take accountability and realize that what they are doing is not working. She says you can still have hard conversations without trying to expose, ruin, dig up, release, or lie about people without proof. Angie adds that some people have learned they can say things and it gets legs, but the show is not about that. She hopes a couple of people can learn to move differently.

#RHOSLC after show! Angie says there are a couple of people in the group who need to take accountability and realize that what they are doing is not working. She says you can still have hard conversations without trying to expose, ruin, dig up, release, or lie about people without proof. Angie adds that some people have learned they can say things and it gets legs, but the show is not about that. She hopes a couple of people can learn to move differently.

Bye Wig Hello Drama

41,251 views • 9 months ago

An Iranian woman just told the West the truth nobody wants to hear. If you need barricades around Christmas markets or you cancel them because of terror threats that is not diversity. That is jihad. Multiculturalism does not mean importing an ideology that despises your values and threatens your families. Security is not hatred. Self respect is not racism. Borders and laws exist for a reason. Wake up before traditions disappear and fear becomes normal. What should the West do now A Enforce borders and security B Keep pretending this is fine C Learn the hard way again

An Iranian woman just told the West the truth nobody wants to hear. If you need barricades around Christmas markets or you cancel them because of terror threats that is not diversity. That is jihad. Multiculturalism does not mean importing an ideology that despises your values and threatens your families. Security is not hatred. Self respect is not racism. Borders and laws exist for a reason. Wake up before traditions disappear and fear becomes normal. What should the West do now A Enforce borders and security B Keep pretending this is fine C Learn the hard way again

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

61,867 views • 9 months ago