Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

34,016 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Stirnerism's profile picture
Stirnerism1 year ago

He got 20 pages in and called it (still more than anyone else got).

OnlineBookClub.org's profile picture
OnlineBookClub.org2 years ago

Video version of @EckhartAurelius's new poem, "Catharsis" This is truly worth watching!

TheStranger's profile picture
TheStranger1 year ago

This strikes me as wrong. Its not “empty” but it is “specific” because to any mind that utters it authentically it is “there” and “now” truly. Its only empty if you abstract the mind away and thereby the purity of the expressed phenomenology.

Heidi Blaubär's profile picture
Heidi Blaubär1 year ago

why did you cut this off here?

Rastrojero rubicundo 🍉's profile picture
Rastrojero rubicundo 🍉1 year ago

Where from?

AustrianSchoolSwift's profile picture
AustrianSchoolSwift1 year ago

I always post this

Humboldt F's profile picture
Humboldt F1 year ago

That's some jeet guru level sophistry: just cuz a moment can be referred it to by way of abstractions, therefore its general, hence sense certainty is a mirage. Sense certainty may well be flawed & inadequate but hardly for this so phrased 'structural' reason

denis tremblay's profile picture
denis tremblay1 year ago

Here a very good introduction for me to Wronski by Deleuze who spoke about Hegel reacting to empirism. Wronski dialectic with his "creation law" own 12 polar interpolated moments contrasted with the three in the Hegel dialectics. W.=(Kant+Hegel) squared

Wesley Corbett's profile picture
Wesley Corbett1 year ago

This might have been a deeper insight at the time, but I think it is more well known now.

nathaniel's profile picture
nathaniel1 year ago

First time hearing Delueze's voice

Related Videos