正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

34,016 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Stirnerism 的头像
Stirnerism1 年前

He got 20 pages in and called it (still more than anyone else got).

OnlineBookClub.org 的头像
OnlineBookClub.org2 年前

Video version of @EckhartAurelius's new poem, "Catharsis" This is truly worth watching!

TheStranger 的头像
TheStranger1 年前

This strikes me as wrong. Its not “empty” but it is “specific” because to any mind that utters it authentically it is “there” and “now” truly. Its only empty if you abstract the mind away and thereby the purity of the expressed phenomenology.

Heidi Blaubär 的头像
Heidi Blaubär1 年前

why did you cut this off here?

Rastrojero rubicundo 🍉 的头像
Rastrojero rubicundo 🍉1 年前

Where from?

AustrianSchoolSwift 的头像
AustrianSchoolSwift1 年前

I always post this

Humboldt F 的头像
Humboldt F1 年前

That's some jeet guru level sophistry: just cuz a moment can be referred it to by way of abstractions, therefore its general, hence sense certainty is a mirage. Sense certainty may well be flawed & inadequate but hardly for this so phrased 'structural' reason

denis tremblay 的头像
denis tremblay1 年前

Here a very good introduction for me to Wronski by Deleuze who spoke about Hegel reacting to empirism. Wronski dialectic with his "creation law" own 12 polar interpolated moments contrasted with the three in the Hegel dialectics. W.=(Kant+Hegel) squared

Wesley Corbett 的头像
Wesley Corbett1 年前

This might have been a deeper insight at the time, but I think it is more well known now.

nathaniel 的头像
nathaniel1 年前

First time hearing Delueze's voice

相关视频