Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Delta Airlines to begin using artificial intelligence algorithms to scrape your emails and more to determine the maximum amount you’re willing to spend on tickets, then adjust your price Example: If you have a death in the family, they’ll know it’s urgent and the price will go up ‘Delta... says it's "fully reengineering how we price" airfare - leaning into Al algorithms that set the maximum price you're willing to spend, based on surveillance technology. About 3% of Delta's domestic ticket prices are now determined by artificial intelligence - and Delta plans to raise that to 20% by the end of the year.’ - More Perfect Union “Delta Airlines just announced on their earnings call that they're going to start using some of these algorithms to price some of their tickets. And imagine a world in which you have a death in the family, you have to go home for a funeral. And they know that through scraping your email, that is, you know, announcing when the service is going to be. They know you're in a tight spot, and so you're going to be charged much more because of that. There's so much data collected about individual people by data brokers, by this whole shadowy ecosystem that's just tracking you through your phone, through your browsing history. — There is a serious worry that companies will be able to do this.” Imagine how many other businesses are going to start doing the same thingshow more

Wall Street Apes

1,369,593 subscribers

1,335,122 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Lina Khan: "The holy grail for companies for a long time has been the ability to charge each person what their willingness to pay is. If you're really hungry for lunch, maybe they'll charge you 10 bucks for a burger, but if you're not that hungry, maybe they'll charge you three bucks... Now there's so much data collected about individual people that there is a serious worry that companies will be able to do this. And actually Delta Airlines just announced on their earnings call that they're gonna start using some of these algorithms to price some of their tickets. And so imagine a world in which you have the death in the family. You have to go home for a funeral. And they know that through scraping your email that is announcing when the service is gonna be, they know you're in a tight spot. So you're gonna be charged much more because of that." Watch the full Lina Khan Episode of Lemonade Stand here:

Lina Khan: "The holy grail for companies for a long time has been the ability to charge each person what their willingness to pay is. If you're really hungry for lunch, maybe they'll charge you 10 bucks for a burger, but if you're not that hungry, maybe they'll charge you three bucks... Now there's so much data collected about individual people that there is a serious worry that companies will be able to do this. And actually Delta Airlines just announced on their earnings call that they're gonna start using some of these algorithms to price some of their tickets. And so imagine a world in which you have the death in the family. You have to go home for a funeral. And they know that through scraping your email that is announcing when the service is gonna be, they know you're in a tight spot. So you're gonna be charged much more because of that." Watch the full Lina Khan Episode of Lemonade Stand here:

More Perfect Union

171,665 views • 10 months ago

Delta Airlines just announced on their Earnings Call they will be using AI Algorithms to comb through your Personal Data to determine How Much You’d be willing to pay So if you’re going to a funeral, they know you’re in a tight spot, exactly when the service will be via your email, and they will charge you extra because they can. Clip Lemonade Stand Show

Delta Airlines just announced on their Earnings Call they will be using AI Algorithms to comb through your Personal Data to determine How Much You’d be willing to pay So if you’re going to a funeral, they know you’re in a tight spot, exactly when the service will be via your email, and they will charge you extra because they can. Clip Lemonade Stand Show

MJTruthUltra

27,510 views • 10 months ago

Don’t Scroll—God Is Calling You to Submit and Move Praise the Lord that He has given us such a commission and such a call and we should be humbled by that and we should want to go out for His kingdom and do that. All of you are usable by God. There is not one of you that is not usable if you're only willing to submit. We all fall short. It's a matter of who is willing. Here I am, Lord, send me. That's what Isaiah said. Here I am. Send me. You are all usable. When a lot of you out there go, well, what can I do for God in my life? There's a lot you can do. If you're only willing to be picked up as an instrument in his Hands and implemented the way you were created to move. Many of you are operating outside the realm of what you were created to be. And in this season, that's going to be reconciled. And many of you are going to change course in this season drastically. Because you're in jobs, you're in areas, you're doing things, you were not created to do. You have gifts for it, but you weren’t created to do it. And there's going to be massive shifts in many of your lives and a sudden turn. And the Lord is going to realign. And this is going to be quick when He does it. Realign you into the position, redirect you and put you on that course because time is short and He needs you operating in what you were created to do. He needs that right now. And many of you are going to enter that process in this season. So praise the Lord because you are. You will enter that process and you will be redirected. And you will do what is written about you in the books of heaven, what you were created to do on this earth. Because many of you know and feel uncomfortable and know you're not in your call. You know you are just trying to try to endure, you're trying to survive. And it's because you're not in your call. Surrender to God, allow Him to redirect you into your call and your purpose that you were beautifully created to do. Because it's needed in this season and we cannot dilly dally anymore and go dabbling in things we are not created to do. It's time for us to go to work and it's time for us to be willing to go there.

Don’t Scroll—God Is Calling You to Submit and Move Praise the Lord that He has given us such a commission and such a call and we should be humbled by that and we should want to go out for His kingdom and do that. All of you are usable by God. There is not one of you that is not usable if you're only willing to submit. We all fall short. It's a matter of who is willing. Here I am, Lord, send me. That's what Isaiah said. Here I am. Send me. You are all usable. When a lot of you out there go, well, what can I do for God in my life? There's a lot you can do. If you're only willing to be picked up as an instrument in his Hands and implemented the way you were created to move. Many of you are operating outside the realm of what you were created to be. And in this season, that's going to be reconciled. And many of you are going to change course in this season drastically. Because you're in jobs, you're in areas, you're doing things, you were not created to do. You have gifts for it, but you weren’t created to do it. And there's going to be massive shifts in many of your lives and a sudden turn. And the Lord is going to realign. And this is going to be quick when He does it. Realign you into the position, redirect you and put you on that course because time is short and He needs you operating in what you were created to do. He needs that right now. And many of you are going to enter that process in this season. So praise the Lord because you are. You will enter that process and you will be redirected. And you will do what is written about you in the books of heaven, what you were created to do on this earth. Because many of you know and feel uncomfortable and know you're not in your call. You know you are just trying to try to endure, you're trying to survive. And it's because you're not in your call. Surrender to God, allow Him to redirect you into your call and your purpose that you were beautifully created to do. Because it's needed in this season and we cannot dilly dally anymore and go dabbling in things we are not created to do. It's time for us to go to work and it's time for us to be willing to go there.

Amanda Grace

12,379 views • 1 month ago

No longer a ‘conspiracy theory’ Online retailers are accessing your data and then adjusting prices for items based on that data Airlines are being caught adjusting prices based on data too “This holiday season, you and your neighbor could be shopping for the exact same item and pay different prices — surveillance pricing is and how your personal data plays a role. You may be shopping for gifts from the comfort of your couch, but stores can still see who you are. Most of these companies are charging you a different price based on some data they have about you. It could be your location, it could be your proximity to the store, it could be your shopping history, knowing that you bought a product previously and are willing pay for it again.” “Consumer watchdog president Jamie Court says surveillance pricing is nearly impossible to avoid — Court says his organization has evidence all the major retailers use personal algorithms to nudge a price up or down, targeting data from your Amazon cart, Uber rides, or even the brand of laptop you're using to shop” “For those traveling for the holidays. Airlines will charge you a different price depending upon how many times you go to the website. “Currently, there is no federal regulation for companies that use surveillance pricing. We reached out to the FTC”

Wall Street Apes

518,939 views • 5 months ago

Jerome Bettis shares the 4 things that get you to greatness. 1. Sacrifice - "You've got to have the ability to sacrifice, and a lot of times that means sacrificing the relationships that mean the most to you." Greatness costs something. Are you willing to pay the price? 2. Pain - "You're going to have to endure some type of pain in your life, whether physical or mental. You've got to find a way to endure." Pain is part of the process. You don't avoid it - you push through it. 3. Failure - "You've got to have the ability to understand that you're going to fail, but it's how you recover that makes you a better person." Failure isn't the end. It's the teacher. 4. Love - "If you love it, then it's not a job - it's a passion. If you love it, you're willing to sacrifice for it, you're willing to go through all type of pains for it. You're willing to go through that failure and understand, 'I will be successful.'" Love is what makes the sacrifice, pain, and failure worth it. "If you go through those 4 things and you understand those and you can handle those then success is in your path, and greatness is available to you." Greatness requires you to show up and take action consistently. (🎥 NFL)

Jerome Bettis shares the 4 things that get you to greatness. 1. Sacrifice - "You've got to have the ability to sacrifice, and a lot of times that means sacrificing the relationships that mean the most to you." Greatness costs something. Are you willing to pay the price? 2. Pain - "You're going to have to endure some type of pain in your life, whether physical or mental. You've got to find a way to endure." Pain is part of the process. You don't avoid it - you push through it. 3. Failure - "You've got to have the ability to understand that you're going to fail, but it's how you recover that makes you a better person." Failure isn't the end. It's the teacher. 4. Love - "If you love it, then it's not a job - it's a passion. If you love it, you're willing to sacrifice for it, you're willing to go through all type of pains for it. You're willing to go through that failure and understand, 'I will be successful.'" Love is what makes the sacrifice, pain, and failure worth it. "If you go through those 4 things and you understand those and you can handle those then success is in your path, and greatness is available to you." Greatness requires you to show up and take action consistently. (🎥 NFL)

Coach AJ 🎯 Mental Fitness

12,356 views • 2 months ago

Marc Andreessen: “I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices.” “We spend a lot of time working with our companies on pricing,” a16z co-founder Marc Andreessen explains. “It’s really this magical art and science that a lot of companies don’t take seriously enough.” Marc continues: “A core principle of pricing is that you don’t want to price by cost if you can avoid it. You want to price by value. Especially when you’re selling to businesses, you want to price as a percentage of the business value you’re creating.” He gives the example of building an AI that can do the job of a programmer, a lawyer, or a radiologist: “Can you price by value and get a percentage of what otherwise would’ve literally been a person? Or equivalently can you price by marginal productivity? If you can take a human doctor and make them much more productive because you give them AI, can you price as a percentage of the productivity uplift?” Marc argues that high prices are under-appreciated by founders: “The naive view on pricing is the lower the pricing, the better it is for the customer. The more sophisticated way of looking at it is that higher prices are often good for the customer because the higher price means the vendor can make the product better, faster. Companies with higher prices and higher margins can actually invest more in R&D and make the product better. Most people who buy things aren’t just looking for the cheapest price. They want something that’s going to work really well.” Marc also emphasizes this point in an interview in Elad Gil’s High Growth Handbook: “What I hear from companies is, ‘Oh, we have an awesome moat, and we’re still going to price our product cheap, because we think that’s somehow going to maximize our business.’ I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. First of all, raising prices is a great way to flesh out whether you actually do have a moat. If you do have a moat, the customers will still buy, because they have to. The definition of a moat is the ability to charge more. And so number one, it’s just a good way to flesh out that topic and really expose it to sunlight. And then number two, companies that charge more can better fund both their distribution efforts and their ongoing R&D efforts. Charging more is a key lever to be able to grow. And the companies that charge more therefore tend to grow faster. That’s counterintuitive to a lot of engineers. A lot of engineers think there’s a one-dimensional relationship between price and value. They have this mental model of commerce like they’re selling rice or something. It’s like, “My product is magical and nobody can replicate it, and I need to price it like it’s a commodity.” No, you don’t. In fact, quite the opposite. If you price it high, then you can fund a much more expensive sales and marketing effort, which means you’re much more likely to win the market, which means you’re much more likely to be able afford to do all the R&D and acquisitions you’re going to want to do. And so we always try to snap people into a two-dimensional mindset, where higher prices equals faster growth.” Video source: a16z (2026)

Marc Andreessen: “I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices.” “We spend a lot of time working with our companies on pricing,” a16z co-founder Marc Andreessen explains. “It’s really this magical art and science that a lot of companies don’t take seriously enough.” Marc continues: “A core principle of pricing is that you don’t want to price by cost if you can avoid it. You want to price by value. Especially when you’re selling to businesses, you want to price as a percentage of the business value you’re creating.” He gives the example of building an AI that can do the job of a programmer, a lawyer, or a radiologist: “Can you price by value and get a percentage of what otherwise would’ve literally been a person? Or equivalently can you price by marginal productivity? If you can take a human doctor and make them much more productive because you give them AI, can you price as a percentage of the productivity uplift?” Marc argues that high prices are under-appreciated by founders: “The naive view on pricing is the lower the pricing, the better it is for the customer. The more sophisticated way of looking at it is that higher prices are often good for the customer because the higher price means the vendor can make the product better, faster. Companies with higher prices and higher margins can actually invest more in R&D and make the product better. Most people who buy things aren’t just looking for the cheapest price. They want something that’s going to work really well.” Marc also emphasizes this point in an interview in Elad Gil’s High Growth Handbook: “What I hear from companies is, ‘Oh, we have an awesome moat, and we’re still going to price our product cheap, because we think that’s somehow going to maximize our business.’ I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. First of all, raising prices is a great way to flesh out whether you actually do have a moat. If you do have a moat, the customers will still buy, because they have to. The definition of a moat is the ability to charge more. And so number one, it’s just a good way to flesh out that topic and really expose it to sunlight. And then number two, companies that charge more can better fund both their distribution efforts and their ongoing R&D efforts. Charging more is a key lever to be able to grow. And the companies that charge more therefore tend to grow faster. That’s counterintuitive to a lot of engineers. A lot of engineers think there’s a one-dimensional relationship between price and value. They have this mental model of commerce like they’re selling rice or something. It’s like, “My product is magical and nobody can replicate it, and I need to price it like it’s a commodity.” No, you don’t. In fact, quite the opposite. If you price it high, then you can fund a much more expensive sales and marketing effort, which means you’re much more likely to win the market, which means you’re much more likely to be able afford to do all the R&D and acquisitions you’re going to want to do. And so we always try to snap people into a two-dimensional mindset, where higher prices equals faster growth.” Video source: a16z (2026)

Startup Archive

422,481 views • 4 months ago

Agents will eventually outnumber humans by orders of magnitude. Aaron Levie on the infrastructure that will be needed to manage them: "Whether you think the number is 10x or 100x... we're going to have some order of magnitude more agents than people." "There's going to be just incredibly spectacularly crazy security incidents that will happen with agents, because you'll prompt-inject an agent and find your way through the CRM system and pull out data you shouldn't have access to." "How do you make sure you have the right security, the permissions, the access controls, the data governance?" "We actually don't yet exactly know in many cases how we're going to regulate some of these agents." "No matter what, there's going to need to be a layer that manages the data they have access to and the workflows they're involved in." "This is the new infrastructure opportunity in the era of agents." Aaron Levie on Latent.Space

Agents will eventually outnumber humans by orders of magnitude. Aaron Levie on the infrastructure that will be needed to manage them: "Whether you think the number is 10x or 100x... we're going to have some order of magnitude more agents than people." "There's going to be just incredibly spectacularly crazy security incidents that will happen with agents, because you'll prompt-inject an agent and find your way through the CRM system and pull out data you shouldn't have access to." "How do you make sure you have the right security, the permissions, the access controls, the data governance?" "We actually don't yet exactly know in many cases how we're going to regulate some of these agents." "No matter what, there's going to need to be a layer that manages the data they have access to and the workflows they're involved in." "This is the new infrastructure opportunity in the era of agents." Aaron Levie on Latent.Space

a16z

64,339 views • 2 months ago

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

77,348 views • 2 years ago

Catherine Austin Fitts: "The problem isn't that [our] currency is fiat...[and] you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold...the central bankers have accumulated all [of it]. [And] now...you're [saying] we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind?" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Jerm Warfare posted to the UK Column News (UK Column) YouTube channel on January 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The thing that makes the current system what they would call slavery is debt-basing and secrecy, okay? And the failure of their elected representatives to obey the law. "So you have lawlessness, you have debt basing and you have secrecy, okay? The problem is not that the currency is fiat, because what I will tell you is if you go back through history, if you read Alexander Del Mar, the most effective currencies in the world are fiat currencies that are well governed. "We have a debt-based fiat currency that is not well governed in my opinion. But it could be. Now, remember, there has been almost no support in the general population for managing it responsibly. Everybody was like, no, don't manage it responsibly, get me my check. And if that means you're irresponsible, that's okay, I want my check. "But you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold and silver. You're going to make it much worse. Because while we've done this sort of hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil, for 30 years the central bankers have accumulated all the gold. So now that they have all the gold, you're going to tell me we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind? "Because now they've got the gold and if you start a gold transaction system now you need gold from them and they've got you over a barrel, right? And what are you going to do to get gold? You're going to have to sell your land, you're going to have to sell your kids, you're going to have to sell real assets to get their gold, right? Why would you do that? "Why would you create— You know, you're dependent on your enemy now you're going to increase your dependency on your enemy now. You're out of your mind, okay? That's not a sound money system. Especially because they want to make it digital. And so they're going to have fiat gold, which is even— I mean, if you think fiat is bad, wait til you see fiat gold when they own all the gold. "So you know, what we want is we want a fiat system and we want it with lawful and no secrecy or minimal secrecy. You're going to have to have some secrecy and a good governance system. Can we get there? Of course we can get there, but we can't get there if you have an entire population that is absolutely committed to corrupt short-term behavior."

Catherine Austin Fitts: "The problem isn't that [our] currency is fiat...[and] you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold...the central bankers have accumulated all [of it]. [And] now...you're [saying] we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind?" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Jerm Warfare posted to the UK Column News (UK Column) YouTube channel on January 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The thing that makes the current system what they would call slavery is debt-basing and secrecy, okay? And the failure of their elected representatives to obey the law. "So you have lawlessness, you have debt basing and you have secrecy, okay? The problem is not that the currency is fiat, because what I will tell you is if you go back through history, if you read Alexander Del Mar, the most effective currencies in the world are fiat currencies that are well governed. "We have a debt-based fiat currency that is not well governed in my opinion. But it could be. Now, remember, there has been almost no support in the general population for managing it responsibly. Everybody was like, no, don't manage it responsibly, get me my check. And if that means you're irresponsible, that's okay, I want my check. "But you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold and silver. You're going to make it much worse. Because while we've done this sort of hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil, for 30 years the central bankers have accumulated all the gold. So now that they have all the gold, you're going to tell me we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind? "Because now they've got the gold and if you start a gold transaction system now you need gold from them and they've got you over a barrel, right? And what are you going to do to get gold? You're going to have to sell your land, you're going to have to sell your kids, you're going to have to sell real assets to get their gold, right? Why would you do that? "Why would you create— You know, you're dependent on your enemy now you're going to increase your dependency on your enemy now. You're out of your mind, okay? That's not a sound money system. Especially because they want to make it digital. And so they're going to have fiat gold, which is even— I mean, if you think fiat is bad, wait til you see fiat gold when they own all the gold. "So you know, what we want is we want a fiat system and we want it with lawful and no secrecy or minimal secrecy. You're going to have to have some secrecy and a good governance system. Can we get there? Of course we can get there, but we can't get there if you have an entire population that is absolutely committed to corrupt short-term behavior."

Sense Receptor

36,772 views • 4 months ago

Perfect breakdown of how Gavin Newsom is stealing the Pacific Palisades fire victims land “Did you see Gavin Newsom's new legislation that's pretty much going to force everyone in the Palisades to sell their home to the government. They just instituted new rules that said if you're going to rebuild your home after it burnt down from the Palisades wildfire, and if the expenditure on rebuilding that home is more than 50% of the prior property value, which is, let's just be real, everyone. - Now you need to raise the entire property structure of the home 3 to 4 feet to meet new floor flood requirements. Yeah, because the problem in the Palisades is too much water - If you're unaware, raising your entire property structure 3 to 4 feet in the Palisades, you're talking tens of millions of dollars per home - Not only will it cost tens of billions of dollars, but for each property, it's going to add years to the rebuild - Oh, and if you can't afford to do that, you can't rebuild - You're not allowed to rebuild your home unless you have a few extra tens of millions to be able to raise the property structure. So what would be your alternatives? Well, you could sell it privately. By the way, they just instituted new rules that are delaying people trying to privately sell their homes in the Palisades. However, you could sell to the government and they will expedite your sale. So if you're in the Palisades and your home burnt down, and when you go to rebuild, if the costs are more than 50% of what the house is worth before, which again, I will say is fine fucking everyone, unless you're building a fucking shack where a mansion used to be, you either need to spend tens of millions of dollars and wait years more, or you can wait years to sell privately, or you can have an expedited sale to the government. Yeah, you guys are never getting your homes back.”

Perfect breakdown of how Gavin Newsom is stealing the Pacific Palisades fire victims land “Did you see Gavin Newsom's new legislation that's pretty much going to force everyone in the Palisades to sell their home to the government. They just instituted new rules that said if you're going to rebuild your home after it burnt down from the Palisades wildfire, and if the expenditure on rebuilding that home is more than 50% of the prior property value, which is, let's just be real, everyone. - Now you need to raise the entire property structure of the home 3 to 4 feet to meet new floor flood requirements. Yeah, because the problem in the Palisades is too much water - If you're unaware, raising your entire property structure 3 to 4 feet in the Palisades, you're talking tens of millions of dollars per home - Not only will it cost tens of billions of dollars, but for each property, it's going to add years to the rebuild - Oh, and if you can't afford to do that, you can't rebuild - You're not allowed to rebuild your home unless you have a few extra tens of millions to be able to raise the property structure. So what would be your alternatives? Well, you could sell it privately. By the way, they just instituted new rules that are delaying people trying to privately sell their homes in the Palisades. However, you could sell to the government and they will expedite your sale. So if you're in the Palisades and your home burnt down, and when you go to rebuild, if the costs are more than 50% of what the house is worth before, which again, I will say is fine fucking everyone, unless you're building a fucking shack where a mansion used to be, you either need to spend tens of millions of dollars and wait years more, or you can wait years to sell privately, or you can have an expedited sale to the government. Yeah, you guys are never getting your homes back.”

Wall Street Apes

56,700 views • 9 months ago

Box CEO Aaron Levie's defense of software over vibe-coded, n-of-1 internal tools: "If you're Ford, and you're doing your supply chain on an ERP system, you want that to work the exact same way every single time." "The billions of transactions going through that ERP system, you cannot take for granted. So the idea that you're going to go vibe-code that is not possible, or at least not likely." "The other point is: your company has a fixed amount of IT resources. And you have to decide what you're going to spend your time on as an organization." "Do you want to spend time on rebuilding something that the market can supply you, that's seen best practices thousands of times? Or do you want to go and build that out with your n-of-1 experience?" "Or do you want to spend your limited, scarce resources on building software, and building experiences, that will make you more money, and that will actually be used by your customers?" "I think on the margin the average enterprise is going to spend their time and energy on the latter." "I'm 100% bullish on vibe-coding, 100% bullish that we're going to have 100x more software. But that still doesn't cross the threshold where I would want to go build our own CRM system."

Box CEO Aaron Levie's defense of software over vibe-coded, n-of-1 internal tools: "If you're Ford, and you're doing your supply chain on an ERP system, you want that to work the exact same way every single time." "The billions of transactions going through that ERP system, you cannot take for granted. So the idea that you're going to go vibe-code that is not possible, or at least not likely." "The other point is: your company has a fixed amount of IT resources. And you have to decide what you're going to spend your time on as an organization." "Do you want to spend time on rebuilding something that the market can supply you, that's seen best practices thousands of times? Or do you want to go and build that out with your n-of-1 experience?" "Or do you want to spend your limited, scarce resources on building software, and building experiences, that will make you more money, and that will actually be used by your customers?" "I think on the margin the average enterprise is going to spend their time and energy on the latter." "I'm 100% bullish on vibe-coding, 100% bullish that we're going to have 100x more software. But that still doesn't cross the threshold where I would want to go build our own CRM system."

TBPN

34,529 views • 3 months ago

Box CEO Aaron Levie's defense of software over vibe-coded, n-of-1 internal tools: "If you're Ford, and you're doing your supply chain on an ERP system, you want that to work the exact same way every single time." "The billions of transactions going through that ERP system, you cannot take for granted. So the idea that you're going to go vibe-code that is not possible, or at least not likely." "The other point is: your company has a fixed amount of IT resources. And you have to decide what you're going to spend your time on as an organization." "Do you want to spend time on rebuilding something that the market can supply you, that's seen best practices thousands of times? Or do you want to go and build that out with your n-of-1 experience?" "Or do you want to spend your limited, scarce resources on building software, and building experiences, that will make you more money, and that will actually be used by your customers?" "I think on the margin the average enterprise is going to spend their time and energy on the latter." "I'm 100% bullish on vibe-coding, 100% bullish that we're going to have 100x more software. But that still doesn't cross the threshold where I would want to go build our own CRM system."

Box CEO Aaron Levie's defense of software over vibe-coded, n-of-1 internal tools: "If you're Ford, and you're doing your supply chain on an ERP system, you want that to work the exact same way every single time." "The billions of transactions going through that ERP system, you cannot take for granted. So the idea that you're going to go vibe-code that is not possible, or at least not likely." "The other point is: your company has a fixed amount of IT resources. And you have to decide what you're going to spend your time on as an organization." "Do you want to spend time on rebuilding something that the market can supply you, that's seen best practices thousands of times? Or do you want to go and build that out with your n-of-1 experience?" "Or do you want to spend your limited, scarce resources on building software, and building experiences, that will make you more money, and that will actually be used by your customers?" "I think on the margin the average enterprise is going to spend their time and energy on the latter." "I'm 100% bullish on vibe-coding, 100% bullish that we're going to have 100x more software. But that still doesn't cross the threshold where I would want to go build our own CRM system."

TBPN

383,620 views • 4 months ago

A message to everybody in Minneapolis: “Let this be a life lesson to protesters. It’s OK to skip your day job and go out there and cry and moan and complain.” “It’s another thing to try to physically assault them.” “Just know that if you try to get in the way of them, you are going to pay the price.” “They are just trying to do their job.”

A message to everybody in Minneapolis: “Let this be a life lesson to protesters. It’s OK to skip your day job and go out there and cry and moan and complain.” “It’s another thing to try to physically assault them.” “Just know that if you try to get in the way of them, you are going to pay the price.” “They are just trying to do their job.”

AmericanPapaBear™

98,584 views • 5 months ago

Netflix opened up an attraction called “Netflix House” and you need to hear this “When you enter Netflix house, you give Netflix the right to you use your name, your likeness, and your voice in any use worldwide, forever, without compensation” This is real “When you go in and you read all the terms, when you walk in there, you're giving them everything. You're giving them your face, your, your movements, your identity, how you talk, how you walk, you're giving them everything. And you're giving them the right to AI generate you, and you're giving them the right to use all that in their content without compensating you whatsoever.” “Oh, and if you bring your child in there, you're also saying that it's okay for you, for, like, them to take your child's data, which is scary.” “So then I got to thinking, you know, why would they be doing this, right? Well, I live in New Jersey, and if you know, New Jersey is the home to the new Netflix, like, Hollywood Studio, essentially. And we know that Warner Brothers Netflix merge. Like, we know that there's a lot happening in the entertainment industry. They're going to need a lot more content to get put out. It's going to be AI generated. It's going to be us. You could not catch me dead walking in there dead.”

Netflix opened up an attraction called “Netflix House” and you need to hear this “When you enter Netflix house, you give Netflix the right to you use your name, your likeness, and your voice in any use worldwide, forever, without compensation” This is real “When you go in and you read all the terms, when you walk in there, you're giving them everything. You're giving them your face, your, your movements, your identity, how you talk, how you walk, you're giving them everything. And you're giving them the right to AI generate you, and you're giving them the right to use all that in their content without compensating you whatsoever.” “Oh, and if you bring your child in there, you're also saying that it's okay for you, for, like, them to take your child's data, which is scary.” “So then I got to thinking, you know, why would they be doing this, right? Well, I live in New Jersey, and if you know, New Jersey is the home to the new Netflix, like, Hollywood Studio, essentially. And we know that Warner Brothers Netflix merge. Like, we know that there's a lot happening in the entertainment industry. They're going to need a lot more content to get put out. It's going to be AI generated. It's going to be us. You could not catch me dead walking in there dead.”

Wall Street Apes

599,268 views • 6 months ago

Whoopi Goldberg dismisses Pratt losing his house in the wildfires and says he needs to know what he's talking about and offer "solutions" before "passing judgment" on Karen Bass. She claims he doesn't "understand what people are going through": GOLDBERG: No, he's not the answer but here's the thing, nobody -- You know, they have bitched about these wildfires as long as I've lived in California, it's always been -- it's always been a problem. But what I don't like is if you don't have any solutions that have not been already tried or if you're throwing shade on people saying she diverted water from this place -I mean, you have to -- you have to have some idea of what needs to be done. A lot of people were affected by those wildfires, a lot of my friends, a lot of people you know lost everything. HOSTIN: Right. GOLDBERG: So this is not, you know, a ha, ha, let's do an A.I. video. This is real stuff. People -- this is people's lives. And so, before you're passing judgment, you need to be able to tell people what you have to offer, Spencer. [Applause] You know, and, you know, I don't know what qualifies as the right way to be a politician, but what I do know is they have to be the people who understand what people are going through. And if you don't understand what people are going through, in the way they're going through it, when you're talking about communities, whole communities that have been burned out, whole groups, legacies that are gone. It's more than just this. It's all these things. You got to be prepared for a lot more stuff than I think you -- it is a really hard job and in California particularly.

Whoopi Goldberg dismisses Pratt losing his house in the wildfires and says he needs to know what he's talking about and offer "solutions" before "passing judgment" on Karen Bass. She claims he doesn't "understand what people are going through": GOLDBERG: No, he's not the answer but here's the thing, nobody -- You know, they have bitched about these wildfires as long as I've lived in California, it's always been -- it's always been a problem. But what I don't like is if you don't have any solutions that have not been already tried or if you're throwing shade on people saying she diverted water from this place -I mean, you have to -- you have to have some idea of what needs to be done. A lot of people were affected by those wildfires, a lot of my friends, a lot of people you know lost everything. HOSTIN: Right. GOLDBERG: So this is not, you know, a ha, ha, let's do an A.I. video. This is real stuff. People -- this is people's lives. And so, before you're passing judgment, you need to be able to tell people what you have to offer, Spencer. [Applause] You know, and, you know, I don't know what qualifies as the right way to be a politician, but what I do know is they have to be the people who understand what people are going through. And if you don't understand what people are going through, in the way they're going through it, when you're talking about communities, whole communities that have been burned out, whole groups, legacies that are gone. It's more than just this. It's all these things. You got to be prepared for a lot more stuff than I think you -- it is a really hard job and in California particularly.

Nicholas Fondacaro

20,824 views • 26 days ago

Whitney Webb: "I think the digital ID is a key enabler of the surveillance, knowing what everyone is is doing and at the transactional, level and being able to tweak that micromanagement based on a person's activity. Because the digital ID isn't just limited to the financial system. Right? It's like your travel, your health history, your career history, your education credentials, your access and telecommunications, social media, the Internet. You know, with the new AI era, right?" "They can fuse all the data, analyze it, you know, and depending on how they develop that AI algorithm, use it to, control people really in in unprecedented ways. I think the the digital ID and the CBDC and its private sector equivalence project is something that we're always sort of intended to be the same system." "So there's documents from the UN, from the BIS, and in related groups that are sort of been working that have been working on this for years. That essentially frame one is essential to the other. Using words about, you know, this is inclusionary, sort of, you know, the whole, I guess marketing behind digital ID is that everyone needs legal ID because otherwise, they're unable to access essential services." "And so, the idea is we all have to be included in the system and they directly link that to the concept of financial inclusion and banking the unbanked, which he brought up earlier. But inherently, these systems actually function in an exclusionary way, based on how they've been set up, you know, they have essentially said that this is the only way." "This will be the only way to prove you have legal identity. And so if you don't participate in that system as far as the state or the, you know, the private sector is concerned, you don't exist. So, by not participating in that system, you're inherently excluded from the economic system and really essentially everything." "So you have to onboard to the surveillance state or be excluded from everything. So it's, you know, being marketed as inclusion, but it's really inherently exclusionary. Totally. So how how does this system get triggered? How do how does how do we move into the the Mark Carney-ism? Well, I think they sort of give it away when they say that this is the new Bretton Woods movement that needs to be seized." "So Bretton Woods was, what came out of World War two, essentially, and was the creation of a new financial governance system after World War two. And this is essentially an effort to create a new financial governance system that was announced well before any sort of crisis like that, but it's probably gonna need a crisis of that level, to be implemented and convince people to onboard at scale." "And if you subscribe to the theory that all wars are bankers wars, which there is, plenty of evidence to support that, I I would say, that seems to suggest that perhaps, you know, the this is the pre, you know, it's gonna be a problem reaction solution type of situation where they've already made the solution, they've already developed what they want to be, the new financial governance system after this new Bretton Woods moment." "They just need some sort of big event on the scale of World War two or some large event that's, you know, equally disruptive in order to be like, all right, now it's time for a new financial governance system after this big event like they did after World War Two."

Whitney Webb: "I think the digital ID is a key enabler of the surveillance, knowing what everyone is is doing and at the transactional, level and being able to tweak that micromanagement based on a person's activity. Because the digital ID isn't just limited to the financial system. Right? It's like your travel, your health history, your career history, your education credentials, your access and telecommunications, social media, the Internet. You know, with the new AI era, right?" "They can fuse all the data, analyze it, you know, and depending on how they develop that AI algorithm, use it to, control people really in in unprecedented ways. I think the the digital ID and the CBDC and its private sector equivalence project is something that we're always sort of intended to be the same system." "So there's documents from the UN, from the BIS, and in related groups that are sort of been working that have been working on this for years. That essentially frame one is essential to the other. Using words about, you know, this is inclusionary, sort of, you know, the whole, I guess marketing behind digital ID is that everyone needs legal ID because otherwise, they're unable to access essential services." "And so, the idea is we all have to be included in the system and they directly link that to the concept of financial inclusion and banking the unbanked, which he brought up earlier. But inherently, these systems actually function in an exclusionary way, based on how they've been set up, you know, they have essentially said that this is the only way." "This will be the only way to prove you have legal identity. And so if you don't participate in that system as far as the state or the, you know, the private sector is concerned, you don't exist. So, by not participating in that system, you're inherently excluded from the economic system and really essentially everything." "So you have to onboard to the surveillance state or be excluded from everything. So it's, you know, being marketed as inclusion, but it's really inherently exclusionary. Totally. So how how does this system get triggered? How do how does how do we move into the the Mark Carney-ism? Well, I think they sort of give it away when they say that this is the new Bretton Woods movement that needs to be seized." "So Bretton Woods was, what came out of World War two, essentially, and was the creation of a new financial governance system after World War two. And this is essentially an effort to create a new financial governance system that was announced well before any sort of crisis like that, but it's probably gonna need a crisis of that level, to be implemented and convince people to onboard at scale." "And if you subscribe to the theory that all wars are bankers wars, which there is, plenty of evidence to support that, I I would say, that seems to suggest that perhaps, you know, the this is the pre, you know, it's gonna be a problem reaction solution type of situation where they've already made the solution, they've already developed what they want to be, the new financial governance system after this new Bretton Woods moment." "They just need some sort of big event on the scale of World War two or some large event that's, you know, equally disruptive in order to be like, all right, now it's time for a new financial governance system after this big event like they did after World War Two."

Camus

20,121 views • 1 year ago

Catherine Austin Fitts on the consequences of $200/barrel oil, if it happens: "we can't drop commercial inventories anymore... [so] oil could go as high as $200" "we're talking about, potentially, a major, major shutdown and layoffs" "I call this Covid 2.0" "if I'm a farmer, it's not just the price [of oil], or the price I have to spend running my tractor, it's the price that goes into my fertilizer and other ingredients" This clip of Fitts, an investment banker, former Assistant Secretary of HUD, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from an interview with Greg Hunter (Greg Hunter) posted to Rumble on June 6, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "Here's the thing. If you look at the current energy prices, we've all been protected because two things are happening. The— Many of the countries that have sovereign strategic reserves, like the United States, have been running down the reserves. "And we are running down the reserves, you know, down to where they were during the Biden administration because of COVID 1.0. I call this Covid 2.0. "But the other thing is that the commercial inventories have been falling and we are approaching probably by mid-June, the level where you can't drop them anymore because you have a certain, you know, you have a certain supply that has to protect and keep the pipeline and other energy infrastructure going... "I was asked this last week to do an interview talking about what AI and automation were doing to employment. And what I said is, don't worry about AI and automation. If you look at what's happening in the energy market, if we really do hit that wall and we can't drop commercial inventories anymore and the strategic reserves won't drop anymore, oil could go as high as $200. "Because now people all around the world are going to have to compete for oil. And the only way that the price, is going to resolve supply and demand is you're going to shut down a whole bunch of capacity. That's why I call it Covid 2.0. You know, we're talking about potentially major, major shutdown and layoffs "We have energy independence, we don't have price independence. So, you know, it's one thing and it's not just price of oil. So if I'm a farmer, it's not just the price, or the price I have to spend running my tractor, it's the price that goes into my fertilizer and other ingredients. "So if we just had another story in Money and Markets about a rice farmer in Asia, who didn't plant because it was going to cost $33,000 to plant her small rice farm and she was going to make $22,000, you know, because your, your costs go up, but that doesn't mean your revenues go up too, right? "So, you know, we're taught we're talking about something that can ripple through the economy. Now, if you look at what happened yesterday, I haven't read the language, but Congress, the House, voted that the president couldn't continue the Iran war without a war resolution. "Four Republicans voted with the Democrats, and that's how it happened. And I think part of it is they can see this wall coming and they know what it means."

Catherine Austin Fitts on the consequences of $200/barrel oil, if it happens: "we can't drop commercial inventories anymore... [so] oil could go as high as $200" "we're talking about, potentially, a major, major shutdown and layoffs" "I call this Covid 2.0" "if I'm a farmer, it's not just the price [of oil], or the price I have to spend running my tractor, it's the price that goes into my fertilizer and other ingredients" This clip of Fitts, an investment banker, former Assistant Secretary of HUD, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from an interview with Greg Hunter (Greg Hunter) posted to Rumble on June 6, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "Here's the thing. If you look at the current energy prices, we've all been protected because two things are happening. The— Many of the countries that have sovereign strategic reserves, like the United States, have been running down the reserves. "And we are running down the reserves, you know, down to where they were during the Biden administration because of COVID 1.0. I call this Covid 2.0. "But the other thing is that the commercial inventories have been falling and we are approaching probably by mid-June, the level where you can't drop them anymore because you have a certain, you know, you have a certain supply that has to protect and keep the pipeline and other energy infrastructure going... "I was asked this last week to do an interview talking about what AI and automation were doing to employment. And what I said is, don't worry about AI and automation. If you look at what's happening in the energy market, if we really do hit that wall and we can't drop commercial inventories anymore and the strategic reserves won't drop anymore, oil could go as high as $200. "Because now people all around the world are going to have to compete for oil. And the only way that the price, is going to resolve supply and demand is you're going to shut down a whole bunch of capacity. That's why I call it Covid 2.0. You know, we're talking about potentially major, major shutdown and layoffs "We have energy independence, we don't have price independence. So, you know, it's one thing and it's not just price of oil. So if I'm a farmer, it's not just the price, or the price I have to spend running my tractor, it's the price that goes into my fertilizer and other ingredients. "So if we just had another story in Money and Markets about a rice farmer in Asia, who didn't plant because it was going to cost $33,000 to plant her small rice farm and she was going to make $22,000, you know, because your, your costs go up, but that doesn't mean your revenues go up too, right? "So, you know, we're taught we're talking about something that can ripple through the economy. Now, if you look at what happened yesterday, I haven't read the language, but Congress, the House, voted that the president couldn't continue the Iran war without a war resolution. "Four Republicans voted with the Democrats, and that's how it happened. And I think part of it is they can see this wall coming and they know what it means."

Sense Receptor

15,232 views • 2 days ago

During her iconic 2007 performance at Shepherd's Bush Empire, Amy told the crowd that ‘Tears Dry on Their Own’ is a “song about when you're in a relationship and you know it's going to end, and you know you're going to be upset, but you know that you have to do it.” 🖤

During her iconic 2007 performance at Shepherd's Bush Empire, Amy told the crowd that ‘Tears Dry on Their Own’ is a “song about when you're in a relationship and you know it's going to end, and you know you're going to be upset, but you know that you have to do it.” 🖤

Amy Winehouse

36,597 views • 1 year ago

You are not going to get something for nothing. You have to pay the price that baseball demands and that price is everything. This game is about the courage to act on your own thoughts and become who you want to become

You are not going to get something for nothing. You have to pay the price that baseball demands and that price is everything. This game is about the courage to act on your own thoughts and become who you want to become

Matt Lisle

28,402 views • 2 months ago

.Secretary Kennedy: “We’re also doing price transparency…When you go to a restaurant, you look at the prices before you buy the meal, you ought to be able to do that when you go to a hospital, and by the time that we leave office, every American is going to have that guarantee.”

.Secretary Kennedy: “We’re also doing price transparency…When you go to a restaurant, you look at the prices before you buy the meal, you ought to be able to do that when you go to a hospital, and by the time that we leave office, every American is going to have that guarantee.”

HHS Rapid Response

76,479 views • 4 months ago