正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Demis Hassabis on the final frontier for AI in science 🧬 : it’s not just about solving the math, it’s about having the creativity to ask the question in the first place. While coding and math are verifiable and easier to automate, natural science requires a "missing ingredient" that... show more

Chris

54,063 subscribers

12,890 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Demis Hassabis explains that tasks like coding and math are easier to automate because they offer clear, verifiable outputs. However, scientific discovery like creating new hypotheses or theories is much harder for AI. It’s not just about solving known problems, but inventing new questions, which requires a higher level of creativity. He believes we're still missing key capabilities needed for that level of AI. While progress is rapid, reaching true scientific innovation without human input remains uncertain.

Demis Hassabis explains that tasks like coding and math are easier to automate because they offer clear, verifiable outputs. However, scientific discovery like creating new hypotheses or theories is much harder for AI. It’s not just about solving known problems, but inventing new questions, which requires a higher level of creativity. He believes we're still missing key capabilities needed for that level of AI. While progress is rapid, reaching true scientific innovation without human input remains uncertain.

Wes Roth

15,090 次观看 • 6 个月前

Why do we have a government in the first place? It’s the most basic question in civics, yet one we rarely stop to ask. I built the Unconventional Civics course on Peterson Academy to challenge assumptions, teach the fundamentals that are glossed over or ignored in the traditional classroom, and give you the tools to think critically.

Why do we have a government in the first place? It’s the most basic question in civics, yet one we rarely stop to ask. I built the Unconventional Civics course on Peterson Academy to challenge assumptions, teach the fundamentals that are glossed over or ignored in the traditional classroom, and give you the tools to think critically.

Dan Crenshaw

36,392 次观看 • 8 个月前

"People talk about [AI] being the death of creativity, or that this is slop and that its somehow against creativity. I think it's absolutely just the opposite. I think [AI] has raised the bar for creativity so much higher." - beeple at Stanford

"People talk about [AI] being the death of creativity, or that this is slop and that its somehow against creativity. I think it's absolutely just the opposite. I think [AI] has raised the bar for creativity so much higher." - beeple at Stanford

NODE

57,176 次观看 • 2 个月前

Caught up with Franklin Arias today after his first seven games with the WooSox. Here is the Boston Red Sox’ No. 1 prospect talking (with the help of translator Juan Montero) about his first week-plus in AAA, what he thinks about playing second base and staying with the organization after having his name brought up during the MLB trade deadline. “It’s something that’s part of the game. I just want to play the game and enjoying it as much as I can and not try to think about it.” On the possibility of being a late season call up to the Red Sox? “I’m just trying to enjoy the game as much as I can and I’m not trying to think about it and when that call comes, I just want to enjoy it as much as I can.”

Caught up with Franklin Arias today after his first seven games with the WooSox. Here is the Boston Red Sox’ No. 1 prospect talking (with the help of translator Juan Montero) about his first week-plus in AAA, what he thinks about playing second base and staying with the organization after having his name brought up during the MLB trade deadline. “It’s something that’s part of the game. I just want to play the game and enjoying it as much as I can and not try to think about it.” On the possibility of being a late season call up to the Red Sox? “I’m just trying to enjoy the game as much as I can and I’m not trying to think about it and when that call comes, I just want to enjoy it as much as I can.”

Tommy Cassell

32,086 次观看 • 7 天前

Demis Hassabis: it's “nonsense” to claim that today's AI chatbots have PhD intelligence “And maybe scaling will get us there, but if I was to bet, I think there are probably one or two missing breakthroughs that are still required and will come over the next five or so years.” Demis Hassabis at the All-In Summit: “You often hear some of our competitors talk about these modern systems that we have today are PhD intelligences.” “I think that's nonsense. They're not PhD intelligences.” “They have some capabilities that are PhD level, but they're not, in general, capable. And that's exactly what general intelligence should be (capable) of, of performing across the board at the PhD level.” “In fact, as we all know, interacting with today's chatbots, if you pose the question in a certain way, they can make simple mistakes with even high school maths and simple counting.” “That shouldn't be possible for a true AGI system.” “So I think that we are maybe, I would say sort of 5-10 years away from having an AGI system that's capable of doing those things.” “Another thing that's missing is continual learning, this ability to like online teach the system something new or adjust its behavior in some way.” “And so a lot of these, I think, core capabilities are still missing.”

Demis Hassabis: it's “nonsense” to claim that today's AI chatbots have PhD intelligence “And maybe scaling will get us there, but if I was to bet, I think there are probably one or two missing breakthroughs that are still required and will come over the next five or so years.” Demis Hassabis at the All-In Summit: “You often hear some of our competitors talk about these modern systems that we have today are PhD intelligences.” “I think that's nonsense. They're not PhD intelligences.” “They have some capabilities that are PhD level, but they're not, in general, capable. And that's exactly what general intelligence should be (capable) of, of performing across the board at the PhD level.” “In fact, as we all know, interacting with today's chatbots, if you pose the question in a certain way, they can make simple mistakes with even high school maths and simple counting.” “That shouldn't be possible for a true AGI system.” “So I think that we are maybe, I would say sort of 5-10 years away from having an AGI system that's capable of doing those things.” “Another thing that's missing is continual learning, this ability to like online teach the system something new or adjust its behavior in some way.” “And so a lot of these, I think, core capabilities are still missing.”

The All-In Podcast

33,934 次观看 • 10 个月前

Just my opinion about the Flock cameras. I think the grid is already in place and these are just apart of the coming narrative.

Just my opinion about the Flock cameras. I think the grid is already in place and these are just apart of the coming narrative.

Ashley Hays

13,354 次观看 • 1 个月前

The vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study has been done roughly a dozen times. But none of those studies are like this one. We had someone who disagreed with us do the work and come to the same conclusion. Science gets stronger that way. That's what the scientific method actually demands... Bring your enemy to the table and say, " Challenge me." For the first time, that's what happened. The researcher came in from the other side of this debate and ended up in the same place the so-called anti-vaccine scientists have been for years. That's the strongest type of science you can do. Watch "An Inconvenient Study" if you haven't yet. All of it is there. Louis Fouché

The vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study has been done roughly a dozen times. But none of those studies are like this one. We had someone who disagreed with us do the work and come to the same conclusion. Science gets stronger that way. That's what the scientific method actually demands... Bring your enemy to the table and say, " Challenge me." For the first time, that's what happened. The researcher came in from the other side of this debate and ended up in the same place the so-called anti-vaccine scientists have been for years. That's the strongest type of science you can do. Watch "An Inconvenient Study" if you haven't yet. All of it is there. Louis Fouché

Del Bigtree

87,971 次观看 • 2 个月前

Spoiler about part 2 “I think it takes Bridgerton in a place we've never seen the show before and in a place that the show's not accustomed to and I think that's really exciting particularly towards the end around about episode 7” Rip John, Benedict angry ??

Spoiler about part 2 “I think it takes Bridgerton in a place we've never seen the show before and in a place that the show's not accustomed to and I think that's really exciting particularly towards the end around about episode 7” Rip John, Benedict angry ??

ᴿᵒʳʸ| Benophie 🛁🫧

51,026 次观看 • 5 个月前

David founder Peter Rahal on why there's not much innovation in food: "Food entrepreneurs are predominately luddites. A lot of talented entrepreneurs just don’t go into food. Because it’s hard. And it’s not obvious how to differentiate. Nutrition science is not seen as a real science. This leads to a lot confusion in the market. For example, the economics don’t work to study the effect of a potato on the human body. There’s just not enough money in potatoes to justify the R&D budget to learn more about them. And so there’s actually not a lot of money going into the research and science of nutrition. Peter Thiel has a quote “If you ever put science behind something, it’s not a real science.” And so nutrition science is not a real science. But it can be. There’s just no money in it. And what is food? It’s really just understanding biochemistry. But it just doesn’t exist. And I think it’s probably driven by the economics of it. So I think that’s the main reason. But hopefully it will change in the future." Full conversation with Peter here:

David founder Peter Rahal on why there's not much innovation in food: "Food entrepreneurs are predominately luddites. A lot of talented entrepreneurs just don’t go into food. Because it’s hard. And it’s not obvious how to differentiate. Nutrition science is not seen as a real science. This leads to a lot confusion in the market. For example, the economics don’t work to study the effect of a potato on the human body. There’s just not enough money in potatoes to justify the R&D budget to learn more about them. And so there’s actually not a lot of money going into the research and science of nutrition. Peter Thiel has a quote “If you ever put science behind something, it’s not a real science.” And so nutrition science is not a real science. But it can be. There’s just no money in it. And what is food? It’s really just understanding biochemistry. But it just doesn’t exist. And I think it’s probably driven by the economics of it. So I think that’s the main reason. But hopefully it will change in the future." Full conversation with Peter here:

The Peel

12,108 次观看 • 29 天前

We asked Elliot Glazer how people should evaluate future AI math breakthroughs. “The buzz phrase you’re gonna be seeing a lot is the difference between problem-solving and theory building.” “You solved the problem using a bunch of techniques, advanced techniques, but very much previously techniques in the human literature. That’s problem-solving.” “We have not yet seen models engage in theory building.” “Coming up with powerful new definitions and techniques that create really great breakthroughs that have ripples across the field.”

We asked Elliot Glazer how people should evaluate future AI math breakthroughs. “The buzz phrase you’re gonna be seeing a lot is the difference between problem-solving and theory building.” “You solved the problem using a bunch of techniques, advanced techniques, but very much previously techniques in the human literature. That’s problem-solving.” “We have not yet seen models engage in theory building.” “Coming up with powerful new definitions and techniques that create really great breakthroughs that have ripples across the field.”

MTS

20,952 次观看 • 2 个月前

AI models pushing the frontier are a growing challenge for cybersecurity. A few weeks ago, I asked Demis what's underhyped in AI right now and on his mind: "I'm very excited about this new agentic era and you can see us leaning into that" "But of course we've also gotta think about the security side of that, too" "You're seeing it a little bit with the cyber worries about some of the models, and I think that's just the beginning of some of the issues that we need to make sure we guard against" "So I think that's playing a little bit on my mind. Maybe this is the time now to try and push some standards and maybe international cooperation"

AI models pushing the frontier are a growing challenge for cybersecurity. A few weeks ago, I asked Demis what's underhyped in AI right now and on his mind: "I'm very excited about this new agentic era and you can see us leaning into that" "But of course we've also gotta think about the security side of that, too" "You're seeing it a little bit with the cyber worries about some of the models, and I think that's just the beginning of some of the issues that we need to make sure we guard against" "So I think that's playing a little bit on my mind. Maybe this is the time now to try and push some standards and maybe international cooperation"

Rowan Cheung

36,216 次观看 • 21 天前

AGI before 2030 or after 2030? Sergey Brin: "Before." Demis Hassabis: "Just after." Sergey Brin laughed. "No pressure, Demis." "I can ask for it. He needs to deliver it." They spent 4 minutes answering rapid-fire questions: The first question was about the web. Alex: "What does the web look like in 10 years?" Sergey paused. "10 years, because of the rate of progress in AI, is so far beyond anything we can foresee." "Not just the web. I don't think we really know what the world looks like in 10 years." Demis agreed. "The web is going to change quite a lot if you think about an agent-first web." "It doesn't necessarily need to render things the way we do as humans using the web." "Things will be pretty different in a few years." They were asked about hiring. Alex: "Would you hire someone who used AI in their interview?" Demis: "Depends how they used it. Using today's models and tools, probably not. But it depends how they would use it, actually." Sergey: "I mean, I've never interviewed at all." The room laughed. Demis: "I haven't either, actually." Then they were asked about simulation theory. Demis had tweeted a video of AI generating a natural scene. The caption: "Nature to simulation at the press of a button. Does make you wonder." Headlines said he thinks we're in a simulation. His answer. "Not in the way that Nick Bostrom and people talk about." "I don't think this is some kind of game, even though I wrote a lot of games." "I do think that ultimately underlying physics is information theory. We're in a computational universe. But it's not just a straightforward simulation." "The fact that these systems are able to model real structures in nature is quite interesting and telling." "I've been thinking a lot about our work with AlphaGo and AlphaFold." "Maybe at some point I'll write up a scientific paper about what I think that really means in terms of what's actually going on here in reality." Sergey pushed further. "That argument applies recursively." "If we're in a simulation, then by the same argument, whatever beings are making the simulation are themselves in a simulation. For roughly the same reasons. And so on and so forth." "You're going to have to either accept that we're in an infinite stack of simulations. Or that there's got to be some stopping criteria." Alex: "What's your best guess?" "I think we're taking a very anthropocentric view." "When we say simulation, we mean some kind of conscious being is running a simulation that we are then in. And that they have some kind of semblance of desire and consciousness that's similar to us." "That's where it kind of breaks down for me." "I just don't think that we're really equipped to reason about one level up in the hierarchy."

AGI before 2030 or after 2030? Sergey Brin: "Before." Demis Hassabis: "Just after." Sergey Brin laughed. "No pressure, Demis." "I can ask for it. He needs to deliver it." They spent 4 minutes answering rapid-fire questions: The first question was about the web. Alex: "What does the web look like in 10 years?" Sergey paused. "10 years, because of the rate of progress in AI, is so far beyond anything we can foresee." "Not just the web. I don't think we really know what the world looks like in 10 years." Demis agreed. "The web is going to change quite a lot if you think about an agent-first web." "It doesn't necessarily need to render things the way we do as humans using the web." "Things will be pretty different in a few years." They were asked about hiring. Alex: "Would you hire someone who used AI in their interview?" Demis: "Depends how they used it. Using today's models and tools, probably not. But it depends how they would use it, actually." Sergey: "I mean, I've never interviewed at all." The room laughed. Demis: "I haven't either, actually." Then they were asked about simulation theory. Demis had tweeted a video of AI generating a natural scene. The caption: "Nature to simulation at the press of a button. Does make you wonder." Headlines said he thinks we're in a simulation. His answer. "Not in the way that Nick Bostrom and people talk about." "I don't think this is some kind of game, even though I wrote a lot of games." "I do think that ultimately underlying physics is information theory. We're in a computational universe. But it's not just a straightforward simulation." "The fact that these systems are able to model real structures in nature is quite interesting and telling." "I've been thinking a lot about our work with AlphaGo and AlphaFold." "Maybe at some point I'll write up a scientific paper about what I think that really means in terms of what's actually going on here in reality." Sergey pushed further. "That argument applies recursively." "If we're in a simulation, then by the same argument, whatever beings are making the simulation are themselves in a simulation. For roughly the same reasons. And so on and so forth." "You're going to have to either accept that we're in an infinite stack of simulations. Or that there's got to be some stopping criteria." Alex: "What's your best guess?" "I think we're taking a very anthropocentric view." "When we say simulation, we mean some kind of conscious being is running a simulation that we are then in. And that they have some kind of semblance of desire and consciousness that's similar to us." "That's where it kind of breaks down for me." "I just don't think that we're really equipped to reason about one level up in the hierarchy."

Jaynit

101,919 次观看 • 24 天前

NEW: Elon Musk issues a profound statement, defending Bobby Kennedy Jr. “I think he’s unfairly maligned as someone who is anti-science, but I think he isn’t. He just wants to question the science, which is the essence of the science. The scientific method, fundamentally, is about always questioning the science.”

NEW: Elon Musk issues a profound statement, defending Bobby Kennedy Jr. “I think he’s unfairly maligned as someone who is anti-science, but I think he isn’t. He just wants to question the science, which is the essence of the science. The scientific method, fundamentally, is about always questioning the science.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,555,705 次观看 • 1 年前

“I was going to write the two teams that keep coming up with Giannis are Miami and Boston…Bill Simmons was the first one to talk about Boston as a place that interests Giannis. And based on everything I’ve heard for the last 2-3 weeks I think that was dead on” - Marc Stein

“I was going to write the two teams that keep coming up with Giannis are Miami and Boston…Bill Simmons was the first one to talk about Boston as a place that interests Giannis. And based on everything I’ve heard for the last 2-3 weeks I think that was dead on” - Marc Stein

Dru

64,227 次观看 • 1 个月前

charles about AI possibly replacing drivers: "i don't think that's the point. i think that people really want to see the human do some extraordinary things, in a way. and i think that's what gives emotion to the people watching TV. in that sense, even if AI could potentially replace us, i think that's not really the point"

charles about AI possibly replacing drivers: "i don't think that's the point. i think that people really want to see the human do some extraordinary things, in a way. and i think that's what gives emotion to the people watching TV. in that sense, even if AI could potentially replace us, i think that's not really the point"

clara

91,527 次观看 • 9 个月前

If you’re angry about the state of the country, or even the world, Nick Fuentes says there’s nothing wrong with you. “I think it’s all the more reason in 2026 we have to double down and say: this isn’t spite…We are not malcontents. We are not freaks. We are not people who are not well-adjusted. I think everyone is realizing we want to fight for our civilization. We want to have a civilization.” “Not only is there nothing wrong with that, that’s actually the only normal position. That is the normal, healthy, righteous disposition.” “It’s not about hating the Indians that are coming here. It’s not about hating Islam or Muslims. It’s not about hating jews. It’s not about hating anybody. It’s about loving our home.” “The things that are killing our country are: mass migration, feminism, and our jewish oligarchy. Our country is not dying, it’s being murdered. Our country is being murdered by these things. Without them we would thrive.”

If you’re angry about the state of the country, or even the world, Nick Fuentes says there’s nothing wrong with you. “I think it’s all the more reason in 2026 we have to double down and say: this isn’t spite…We are not malcontents. We are not freaks. We are not people who are not well-adjusted. I think everyone is realizing we want to fight for our civilization. We want to have a civilization.” “Not only is there nothing wrong with that, that’s actually the only normal position. That is the normal, healthy, righteous disposition.” “It’s not about hating the Indians that are coming here. It’s not about hating Islam or Muslims. It’s not about hating jews. It’s not about hating anybody. It’s about loving our home.” “The things that are killing our country are: mass migration, feminism, and our jewish oligarchy. Our country is not dying, it’s being murdered. Our country is being murdered by these things. Without them we would thrive.”

Fractured Light

71,618 次观看 • 7 个月前

RFK Jr. and JD Vance agree that real science means questioning everything — even established science. RFK Jr: “Over the Royal Society in London, which is the oldest scientific society in the world and the most prestigious… it says question everything.” “That's what science is.” “It's recognizing that convention is often wrong, and that the people who make advances on science almost 100% of the time are people who are willing to challenge orthodoxies.” JD Vance: “That's absolutely right.”

RFK Jr. and JD Vance agree that real science means questioning everything — even established science. RFK Jr: “Over the Royal Society in London, which is the oldest scientific society in the world and the most prestigious… it says question everything.” “That's what science is.” “It's recognizing that convention is often wrong, and that the people who make advances on science almost 100% of the time are people who are willing to challenge orthodoxies.” JD Vance: “That's absolutely right.”

End Tribalism in Politics

13,261 次观看 • 9 个月前

Today we’re launching INTELLECT-2: The first decentralized 32B-parameter RL training run open to join for anyone with compute — fully permissionless. Scaling towards frontier reasoning across coding, math and science.

Today we’re launching INTELLECT-2: The first decentralized 32B-parameter RL training run open to join for anyone with compute — fully permissionless. Scaling towards frontier reasoning across coding, math and science.

Prime Intellect

353,791 次观看 • 1 年前

Ex-Google CEO explains the Software programmer paradigm is rapidly coming to an end. Math and coding will be fully automated within 2 years and that's the basis of everything else. "It's very exciting." - Eric Schmidt All of that's gonna happen. The question is: what is the point in which this becomes a national emergency?

Ex-Google CEO explains the Software programmer paradigm is rapidly coming to an end. Math and coding will be fully automated within 2 years and that's the basis of everything else. "It's very exciting." - Eric Schmidt All of that's gonna happen. The question is: what is the point in which this becomes a national emergency?

Lethal Intelligence

236,646 次观看 • 1 年前