正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Democracy has a design flaw.

54,263 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

33 条评论

Lina Seiche 的头像
Lina Seiche9 个月前

This is an excerpt from my latest YouTube video, you can watch it here 😊

Ian Miles 的头像
Ian Miles9 个月前

Liberalism is a failed experiment.

Kevin DeAnna 的头像
Kevin DeAnna9 个月前

great work

MrWard 的头像
MrWard9 个月前

Democracy’s design flaw is allowing everyone to vote

Paul Rossi 的头像
Paul Rossi9 个月前

Just give me the marshmallow

Silvia Pencak 的头像
Silvia Pencak9 个月前

Which is why democracy works when countries have educated voters. Left-wing leaders tend to take advantage of uneducated voters who get swayed by easy wins misunderstanding their long-term impact, paving the way to totalitarianism or dictatorship... 😉

Jerry Fletcher 的头像
Jerry Fletcher9 个月前

Democracy has no design flaw; it functions exactly as intended, as a disguised form of socialism.

peter vq 的头像
peter vq9 个月前

Yes yes !! Please, people, stop worshipping ’democracy’; see the lectures and book by Hans Hermann Hoppe "Democracy - The God that Failed"; (plenty videos, talks, writings online and at the Mises Institute web pages and Hoppe’s ‘Property and Freedom Society’) - Democracy, inevitably, will, over time, enable the worst characters & personalities to rise to the top; those who desire power & control, those who can best make the greatest- but empty promises & best pretend to be virtuous... or are best at coercing others to vote for them ... plus, as Lina explains, having the incentive of needing to fit their gain into a few short-term-years of ruling instead of prioritizing long-term success for the nation - - “… A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves benefits from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.. “ - Alexander Fraser Tytler or Alexis de Tocqueville see Hans Hermann Hoppe's many talks and lectures on his book 'Democracy - the God that failed' ! free download :

Julian le Roux 的头像
Julian le Roux9 个月前

Also, secret ballot democracy is the worst form of democracy. To each individual voter it grants the power of the state, but with ZERO personal accountability. This incentivizes a pure "tragedy of the commons" scenario. A cold war of all against all.

DiegoMontoya 的头像
DiegoMontoya9 个月前

You should tell people about the book you got this from.

Wahlaristokrat 的头像
Wahlaristokrat9 个月前

#Sortition, i.e #DemocracyByLot fosters long term thinking and decision making

David E Caldwell 的头像
David E Caldwell9 个月前

The Left want to increase the number of Low IQ people who will vote stupidly for short term handouts, not seeing the long term consequences.

J5 的头像
J59 个月前

I think that’s a fair point.

Roger Marques 的头像
Roger Marques9 个月前

The OG democratic high time preference: The Sicilian Expedition

GrainBeltKing 的头像
GrainBeltKing9 个月前

Monarchy solves this.

JW the Gavel 的头像
JW the Gavel9 个月前

Democracy requires a well educated and morally aligned electorate. Without those things collapse is inevitable.

lucid 的头像
lucid9 个月前

the answer is constitutional monarchies

Grey | thaler. △ 的头像
Grey | thaler. △9 个月前

Beautifully said 👏

Chris & Beth 的头像
Chris & Beth9 个月前

Which is why the US is NOT a democracy.

Steven Thrasher 的头像
Steven Thrasher9 个月前

So, @LinaSeiche what would you propose to create a system that would bias towards a long-term good time preference?

Diogo Valada 的头像
Diogo Valada8 个月前

Astonished by the quality of the content in this account. How am I only finding out about it now?

Lina Seiche 的头像
Lina Seiche8 个月前

🙏

Stackmore 3.125 🔑⚡️🔦 的头像
Stackmore 3.125 🔑⚡️🔦9 个月前

Yes

Truth is power 的头像
Truth is power9 个月前

Democracy wasn't intended for an electorate that's: - poorly educated - absent wisdom, virtue & integrity; values common to Christians Educated & Christian Politicians aren't in politics for self-interests; they're serving their populace, hence planning beyond is desirable.

Nervous Neuron 的头像
Nervous Neuron9 个月前

It's more like game theory. One may vote for delayed gratification, but if the instant gratification voters win, they get their gains and leave delayed gratification voters with the bill.

e.n. 的头像
e.n.9 个月前

When you realize the best self-help book is an economics text book talking about time preference.

Seth Meister⚡️ - Invictus🏴‍☠️ 的头像
Seth Meister⚡️ - Invictus🏴‍☠️9 个月前

Well put, Lina.

Matthew Nguyen 的头像
Matthew Nguyen9 个月前

Blah blah blah... Only so many hours in a day with physical energy to have it

Ari Goldberg 的头像
Ari Goldberg9 个月前

Democracy is not the model, republic is. And liberty has all the self-correcting mechanisms needed to correct for any perceived (not actual) design flaws.

Ukaraiah 的头像
Ukaraiah9 个月前

Rather Hoppeful

Avidreader2525 的头像
Avidreader25259 个月前

This is worth my follow; I'll see what comes of it.🤔

EditionA 的头像
EditionA9 个月前

The entire Chicago parking meter selloff is 3rd world time preference done at a city scale:

remigration supporter 的头像
remigration supporter9 个月前

yes mommy

相关视频