Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

DEMOCRATS HATE THIS: Vance just explained the COMMON SENSE reasons we NEED Greenland for National Security. "It is the threat of American power that keeps Greenland safe. Everybody knows that China and Russia have national security interests there. Everybody knows they would love to take it if they could."...

GuntherEagleman's profile picture

Gunther Eagleman™

1,729,847 subscribers

19,814 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🇺🇸🇬🇱 JD Vance on Greenland: "What keeps Russia or China from invading Greenland? Is it the power of Denmark? As much as I love Denmark, no, it's the power of the United States of America."
0:36

🇺🇸🇬🇱 JD Vance on Greenland: "What keeps Russia or China from invading Greenland? Is it the power of Denmark? As much as I love Denmark, no, it's the power of the United States of America."

Mario Nawfal

192,953 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

JD Vance on Greenland: Greenland matters to American national security because our entire missile defense relies on security in the Arctic. If a foreign country launched a missile at the United States of America, we would need control over the Arctic in order to shoot that missile down. Our entire missile defense system depends on that Arctic security. The Chinese and the Russians and even the Danes who control Greenland want to control that facility and that land mass. That would make us weaker. That would make our country more endangered. It would mean that if the President were negotiating with a foreign leader, he would have less leverage because they could realistically threaten the sovereignty and territorial safety of the United States of America. We’re not going to let that happen.
0:57

JD Vance on Greenland: Greenland matters to American national security because our entire missile defense relies on security in the Arctic. If a foreign country launched a missile at the United States of America, we would need control over the Arctic in order to shoot that missile down. Our entire missile defense system depends on that Arctic security. The Chinese and the Russians and even the Danes who control Greenland want to control that facility and that land mass. That would make us weaker. That would make our country more endangered. It would mean that if the President were negotiating with a foreign leader, he would have less leverage because they could realistically threaten the sovereignty and territorial safety of the United States of America. We’re not going to let that happen.

Clash Report

42,338 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇬🇱 US vice president Vance on Greenland: If some foreign country launches an ICBM to the US, our entire missile defense system could be destabilized. If you don't control the Arctic, that means Americans are less safe. > Well, the US has been based on Greenland for decades, why now, do they need to own the Island? If it's about security, they have NATO. This argument is weak. And Russia's RS-28 ICBM "Satan II" can go over the south pole instead. No defense system could detect/stop it. Greenland isn't about security rather the resources of the North.
0:26

🇺🇸🇬🇱 US vice president Vance on Greenland: If some foreign country launches an ICBM to the US, our entire missile defense system could be destabilized. If you don't control the Arctic, that means Americans are less safe. > Well, the US has been based on Greenland for decades, why now, do they need to own the Island? If it's about security, they have NATO. This argument is weak. And Russia's RS-28 ICBM "Satan II" can go over the south pole instead. No defense system could detect/stop it. Greenland isn't about security rather the resources of the North.

Spetsnaℤ 007 🇷🇺

32,623 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

JD Vance, "Denmark has not kept pace in devoting the resources necessary to keep this base, the troops and the people of Greenland safe from Russia and China" "With all due respect to our Danish allies they have not kept pace" "There's a lot of criticism from Denmark, against President Trump, against me, for saying Denmark has not done a good job at keeping Greenland safe" "Recognising important security partnerships in the past does not mean that we can't have disagreement with allies in the present" "Our message to Denmark is very simple, you have not done a good job by the people of Greenland, and you have underinvest in the security architecture" "This is why President Trump's policy in Greenland is what it is" "Our American troops show respect for the local Greenland population.. We respect the self determination of Greenland" "Our argument is not with the people of Greenland, its with the people of Denmark"
2:43

JD Vance, "Denmark has not kept pace in devoting the resources necessary to keep this base, the troops and the people of Greenland safe from Russia and China" "With all due respect to our Danish allies they have not kept pace" "There's a lot of criticism from Denmark, against President Trump, against me, for saying Denmark has not done a good job at keeping Greenland safe" "Recognising important security partnerships in the past does not mean that we can't have disagreement with allies in the present" "Our message to Denmark is very simple, you have not done a good job by the people of Greenland, and you have underinvest in the security architecture" "This is why President Trump's policy in Greenland is what it is" "Our American troops show respect for the local Greenland population.. We respect the self determination of Greenland" "Our argument is not with the people of Greenland, its with the people of Denmark"

Farrukh

36,283 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇺🇸🇬🇱 JD VANCE: GREENLAND VITAL TO U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY "Greenland is really important to our national security. There are sea lanes there that the Chinese use, that the Russians use, that frankly, Denmark, which controls Greenland, it's not doing its job, and it's not being a good ally. If that means that we need to take more territorial interest in Greenland, that is what President Trump is going to do, because he cares about putting the interests of America's citizens first." Source: Fox JD Vance Maria Bartiromo
1:20

🇺🇸🇬🇱 JD VANCE: GREENLAND VITAL TO U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY "Greenland is really important to our national security. There are sea lanes there that the Chinese use, that the Russians use, that frankly, Denmark, which controls Greenland, it's not doing its job, and it's not being a good ally. If that means that we need to take more territorial interest in Greenland, that is what President Trump is going to do, because he cares about putting the interests of America's citizens first." Source: Fox JD Vance Maria Bartiromo

Mario Nawfal

576,165 просмотров • 1 год назад

Vice President JD Vance just gave a perfect explanation for why the United States is pushing to acquire Greenland. "Greenland is critical not just to our national security, but to the world's national security. People don't realize this. The entire missile defense infrastructure is partially dependent on Greenland." "If, God forbid, in the future, somebody launched a nuclear missile into our continent, they launched a nuclear missile at Europe. Greenland is a critical part of that missile defense. So you ask yourself, have the Europeans, have the Danes done a proper job of securing Greenland and making sure it can continue to serve as an anchor for world security and missile defense? And the answer is, obviously, they haven't. They've underinvested in their security. They haven't done a good job of securing that area, that land mass." BINGO.
1:43

Vice President JD Vance just gave a perfect explanation for why the United States is pushing to acquire Greenland. "Greenland is critical not just to our national security, but to the world's national security. People don't realize this. The entire missile defense infrastructure is partially dependent on Greenland." "If, God forbid, in the future, somebody launched a nuclear missile into our continent, they launched a nuclear missile at Europe. Greenland is a critical part of that missile defense. So you ask yourself, have the Europeans, have the Danes done a proper job of securing Greenland and making sure it can continue to serve as an anchor for world security and missile defense? And the answer is, obviously, they haven't. They've underinvested in their security. They haven't done a good job of securing that area, that land mass." BINGO.

George

557,821 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

At Davos, Trump took aim at Denmark over Greenland, insisting the U.S. must acquire it: "In 2019, Denmark said that they would spend over $200 million to strengthen Greenland's defenses. But, as you know, they spent less than 1 percent of that amount. One percent!" "There's NO SIGN of Denmark there...It's the United States alone that can protect this giant mass of land, this giant piece of ice, develop it, and improve it, and make it so that it's good for Europe and safe for Europe and good for us." "I am seeking the acquisition of Greenland by the United States."
1:01

At Davos, Trump took aim at Denmark over Greenland, insisting the U.S. must acquire it: "In 2019, Denmark said that they would spend over $200 million to strengthen Greenland's defenses. But, as you know, they spent less than 1 percent of that amount. One percent!" "There's NO SIGN of Denmark there...It's the United States alone that can protect this giant mass of land, this giant piece of ice, develop it, and improve it, and make it so that it's good for Europe and safe for Europe and good for us." "I am seeking the acquisition of Greenland by the United States."

Open Source Intel

57,314 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Trump: "We need Greenland from a national security situation. It's so strategic. Right now, Greenland is covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place. We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security. And Denmark is not gonna be able to do it ... the European Union needs us to have it"
1:08

Trump: "We need Greenland from a national security situation. It's so strategic. Right now, Greenland is covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place. We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security. And Denmark is not gonna be able to do it ... the European Union needs us to have it"

Aaron Rupar

175,564 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller: The president has been clear for months now that the United States should be the nation that has Greenland as part of our overall security apparatus. That is the formal position of the US government. [Q]: But can you say that military action against Greenland is off the table? Miller: It wouldn't be military action against Greenland. Greenland has a population of 30,000 people. The real question is, by what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their territorial claim? What is their basis of having Greenland as a colony of Denmark? The United States is the power of NATO. There's no need to even think or talk about this in the context that you're asking of a military operation. Nobody's going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland.
2:51

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller: The president has been clear for months now that the United States should be the nation that has Greenland as part of our overall security apparatus. That is the formal position of the US government. [Q]: But can you say that military action against Greenland is off the table? Miller: It wouldn't be military action against Greenland. Greenland has a population of 30,000 people. The real question is, by what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their territorial claim? What is their basis of having Greenland as a colony of Denmark? The United States is the power of NATO. There's no need to even think or talk about this in the context that you're asking of a military operation. Nobody's going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland.

Anton Gerashchenko

56,970 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 WOW. President Trump in Davos is now CALLING OUT Denmark for failing to defend Greenland and declaring the US needs to acquire it "In 2019, Denmark said that they would spend over $200 million to strengthen Greenland's defenses. But, as you know, they spent less than 1 percent of that amount. One percent!" "There's NO SIGN of Denmark there...It's the United States alone that can protect this giant mass of land, this giant piece of ice, develop it, and improve it, and make it so that it's good for Europe and safe for Europe and good for us." "I am seeking the acquisition of Greenland by the United States."
1:01

🚨 WOW. President Trump in Davos is now CALLING OUT Denmark for failing to defend Greenland and declaring the US needs to acquire it "In 2019, Denmark said that they would spend over $200 million to strengthen Greenland's defenses. But, as you know, they spent less than 1 percent of that amount. One percent!" "There's NO SIGN of Denmark there...It's the United States alone that can protect this giant mass of land, this giant piece of ice, develop it, and improve it, and make it so that it's good for Europe and safe for Europe and good for us." "I am seeking the acquisition of Greenland by the United States."

Eric Daugherty

127,748 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

.President Donald J. Trump: "Greenland is very important for the United States but it's not important for Denmark. In fact, when Denmark was overrun by the Nazis in less than one day...they asked us to take care of Greenland...We shouldn't have given it back to them because we're the ones that need it. We need it for protection of the world—not just the United States."
1:10

.President Donald J. Trump: "Greenland is very important for the United States but it's not important for Denmark. In fact, when Denmark was overrun by the Nazis in less than one day...they asked us to take care of Greenland...We shouldn't have given it back to them because we're the ones that need it. We need it for protection of the world—not just the United States."

Rapid Response 47

561,811 просмотров • 9 дней назад

Europe just took a hard stand against Donald Trump's endeavors to annex Greenland. The President of the European Parliament, Roberta Metsola, just issued this stern warning to Trump: “The European Union supports Denmark and the people of Greenland. And we do so united in our resolve. The measures threatened over the weekend by the United States administration will not help improve security in the Arctic. In fact, they risk the opposite. Greenland and Denmark have both made clear that Greenland is not for sale and that they're sovereignty and territorial integrity needs to be respected. That fact will not change!”
0:37

Europe just took a hard stand against Donald Trump's endeavors to annex Greenland. The President of the European Parliament, Roberta Metsola, just issued this stern warning to Trump: “The European Union supports Denmark and the people of Greenland. And we do so united in our resolve. The measures threatened over the weekend by the United States administration will not help improve security in the Arctic. In fact, they risk the opposite. Greenland and Denmark have both made clear that Greenland is not for sale and that they're sovereignty and territorial integrity needs to be respected. That fact will not change!”

Ed Krassenstein

218,606 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Claims that Russian and Chinese ships are all over Greenland are false. Moreover, a 1951 agreement between the Kingdom of Denmark and the United States already grants the United States broad access to Greenland if it determines that there is a security threat.
1:06

Claims that Russian and Chinese ships are all over Greenland are false. Moreover, a 1951 agreement between the Kingdom of Denmark and the United States already grants the United States broad access to Greenland if it determines that there is a security threat.

Orla Joelsen

359,749 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Danish foreign minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen just completely rebuked Trump and called him out on his false narrative: “The long-term security of Greenland can be insured inside the current framework: the 1951 agreement on the defense of Greenland as well as the NATO treaty. For us ideas that would not respect territorial integrity of the kingdom of Denmark and the right of self-determination of the Greenlandic people are of course totally unacceptable.” Trump keeps saying we have to protect Greenland from China and Russia. The treaties that are in place already do that. This is all about Trump trying to annex Greenland.
0:26

BREAKING: Danish foreign minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen just completely rebuked Trump and called him out on his false narrative: “The long-term security of Greenland can be insured inside the current framework: the 1951 agreement on the defense of Greenland as well as the NATO treaty. For us ideas that would not respect territorial integrity of the kingdom of Denmark and the right of self-determination of the Greenlandic people are of course totally unacceptable.” Trump keeps saying we have to protect Greenland from China and Russia. The treaties that are in place already do that. This is all about Trump trying to annex Greenland.

Ed Krassenstein

214,413 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

'Denmark was unable to protect either itself or Greenland from Germany in the Second World War' - Trump cites historical arguments why they should give him the island. 'Do you want me to say a few words about Greenland? I was going to exclude this from my speech, but I thought I would be judged very negatively for it. I have great respect for both the people of Greenland and the people of Denmark. But the fact is that no country or group of countries, except the United States, is in a position to ensure the security of Greenland. We are a great power, much more powerful than many people realize. I think they understood this two weeks ago in Venezuela.' We have already seen something similar during the Second World War, when Denmark fell under the onslaught of Germany after just six hours of fighting and was completely unable to protect either itself or Greenland. Then the United States was forced to intervene. We did this because we considered it our duty to send our own forces to hold onto the territory of Greenland. We did this at a huge cost and effort. They didn't have a single chance of getting there, although they tried. Denmark knows this.' - SK
1:33

'Denmark was unable to protect either itself or Greenland from Germany in the Second World War' - Trump cites historical arguments why they should give him the island. 'Do you want me to say a few words about Greenland? I was going to exclude this from my speech, but I thought I would be judged very negatively for it. I have great respect for both the people of Greenland and the people of Denmark. But the fact is that no country or group of countries, except the United States, is in a position to ensure the security of Greenland. We are a great power, much more powerful than many people realize. I think they understood this two weeks ago in Venezuela.' We have already seen something similar during the Second World War, when Denmark fell under the onslaught of Germany after just six hours of fighting and was completely unable to protect either itself or Greenland. Then the United States was forced to intervene. We did this because we considered it our duty to send our own forces to hold onto the territory of Greenland. We did this at a huge cost and effort. They didn't have a single chance of getting there, although they tried. Denmark knows this.' - SK

Zlatti71

52,454 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 DENMARK IN PANIC MODE AS TRUMP SETS HIS SIGHTS ON GREENLAND President Trump has shattered Europe’s comfort zone by putting Greenland firmly on the U.S. strategic map — and Copenhagen knows it. After Trump signaled that America will not allow Russia or China to control the Arctic’s crown jewel, Denmark and its European allies suddenly began emergency talks about military deployments and “security guarantees” around Greenland. That is not routine diplomacy. That is fear. Greenland sits at the crossroads of: • Arctic shipping lanes • U.S. missile-warning systems • Rare-earth minerals vital to AI and weapons • The northern gateway to North America Trump said the quiet part out loud: whoever controls Greenland controls the future balance of power in the Arctic. Now Europe is scrambling to lock it down before Washington moves. This isn’t about treaties. This isn’t about climate. This is about power — and Denmark knows it just lost the illusion of control.
1:19

🚨 DENMARK IN PANIC MODE AS TRUMP SETS HIS SIGHTS ON GREENLAND President Trump has shattered Europe’s comfort zone by putting Greenland firmly on the U.S. strategic map — and Copenhagen knows it. After Trump signaled that America will not allow Russia or China to control the Arctic’s crown jewel, Denmark and its European allies suddenly began emergency talks about military deployments and “security guarantees” around Greenland. That is not routine diplomacy. That is fear. Greenland sits at the crossroads of: • Arctic shipping lanes • U.S. missile-warning systems • Rare-earth minerals vital to AI and weapons • The northern gateway to North America Trump said the quiet part out loud: whoever controls Greenland controls the future balance of power in the Arctic. Now Europe is scrambling to lock it down before Washington moves. This isn’t about treaties. This isn’t about climate. This is about power — and Denmark knows it just lost the illusion of control.

Jim Ferguson

12,890 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

.Vice President JD Vance: “For world security, what we have to recognize is that if the Chinese and the Russians are going to pursue their national interests, we need a president who's going to pursue the American national interest. And that means ensuring that Greenland is safe.”
0:30

.Vice President JD Vance: “For world security, what we have to recognize is that if the Chinese and the Russians are going to pursue their national interests, we need a president who's going to pursue the American national interest. And that means ensuring that Greenland is safe.”

Trump War Room

41,505 просмотров • 1 год назад

Greenland: Defeating putin in Ukraine is the real key to the Arctic. A US Senator, Jeanne Shaheen from the state of New Hampshire, has warned that Trump’s recent rhetoric on Greenland could benefit putin and China. “Now, why would anyone undermine what has been such a positive relationship? Why would anyone chip away at security and prosperity on both sides of the Atlantic? As a Democrat from the United States, I can't give you a good answer. As your prime minister has said, an American military takeover of Greenland would threaten NATO as we know it. And even short of that, just the suggestion that the US would take Greenland by force does real damage not just to the relationship with Greenland, with Denmark, but to America's own national security. It erodes decades of hard-won confidence among allies and it weakens the sense of security that comes with it, and that rhetoric plays right into the hands of our greatest adversaries, Russia and China. vladimir putin would welcome any move that fractures NATO or diverts attention and resources away from Ukraine. It's a point that your prime minister made, um, again when we met with her this morning, and she's made very eloquently over a period of time. If we're serious about limiting Russia's influence in the Arctic and beyond, the most effective way to do that is by defeating vladimir putin in Ukraine. And that's precisely why the current debate over Greenland makes so little sense.”
1:30

Greenland: Defeating putin in Ukraine is the real key to the Arctic. A US Senator, Jeanne Shaheen from the state of New Hampshire, has warned that Trump’s recent rhetoric on Greenland could benefit putin and China. “Now, why would anyone undermine what has been such a positive relationship? Why would anyone chip away at security and prosperity on both sides of the Atlantic? As a Democrat from the United States, I can't give you a good answer. As your prime minister has said, an American military takeover of Greenland would threaten NATO as we know it. And even short of that, just the suggestion that the US would take Greenland by force does real damage not just to the relationship with Greenland, with Denmark, but to America's own national security. It erodes decades of hard-won confidence among allies and it weakens the sense of security that comes with it, and that rhetoric plays right into the hands of our greatest adversaries, Russia and China. vladimir putin would welcome any move that fractures NATO or diverts attention and resources away from Ukraine. It's a point that your prime minister made, um, again when we met with her this morning, and she's made very eloquently over a period of time. If we're serious about limiting Russia's influence in the Arctic and beyond, the most effective way to do that is by defeating vladimir putin in Ukraine. And that's precisely why the current debate over Greenland makes so little sense.”

Yasmina

23,263 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Let's get the facts straight regarding Trump's newest statements about Greenland: 1) Greenland has been owned by Denmark since 1380 and is today a fully integrated but self-governing part of Denmark. Very much like Alaska is part of the USA. 2) The USA does not have any historical claims to Greenland. On contrary they have signed numerous treaties with Denmark recognising Danish ownership. 3) The USA does NOT need Greenland for national security. The USA already has a defence agreement with Denmark that allows the USA to have as much military presence as they want in Greenland. They have decided to only have 150 troops currently. Why? Because: 4) Neither China nor Russia have any presence in Greenland at all. No companies, no mining, no consulates. Nothing. And they do not threaten Greenland. The only threat against Greenland is the USA.
1:20

Let's get the facts straight regarding Trump's newest statements about Greenland: 1) Greenland has been owned by Denmark since 1380 and is today a fully integrated but self-governing part of Denmark. Very much like Alaska is part of the USA. 2) The USA does not have any historical claims to Greenland. On contrary they have signed numerous treaties with Denmark recognising Danish ownership. 3) The USA does NOT need Greenland for national security. The USA already has a defence agreement with Denmark that allows the USA to have as much military presence as they want in Greenland. They have decided to only have 150 troops currently. Why? Because: 4) Neither China nor Russia have any presence in Greenland at all. No companies, no mining, no consulates. Nothing. And they do not threaten Greenland. The only threat against Greenland is the USA.

Rasmus Jarlov

594,837 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

US Vice President JD Vance announced that he plans to travel to Greenland on Friday. "I'm going to visit some of our guardians in the Space Force on the northwest coast of Greenland and also just check out what's going on with the security there of Greenland. A lot of other countries have threatened Greenland, have threatened to use its territories and its waterways to threaten the United States, to threaten Canada, and of course, to threaten the people of Greenland. I say that speaking for President Trump, we want to reinvigorate the security of the people of Greenland because we think it's important to protecting the security of the entire world. Unfortunately, leaders in both America and in Denmark ignored Greenland for far too long. That's been bad for Greenland. It's also been bad for the security of the entire world. We think we can take things in a different direction," JD Vance said.
0:58

US Vice President JD Vance announced that he plans to travel to Greenland on Friday. "I'm going to visit some of our guardians in the Space Force on the northwest coast of Greenland and also just check out what's going on with the security there of Greenland. A lot of other countries have threatened Greenland, have threatened to use its territories and its waterways to threaten the United States, to threaten Canada, and of course, to threaten the people of Greenland. I say that speaking for President Trump, we want to reinvigorate the security of the people of Greenland because we think it's important to protecting the security of the entire world. Unfortunately, leaders in both America and in Denmark ignored Greenland for far too long. That's been bad for Greenland. It's also been bad for the security of the entire world. We think we can take things in a different direction," JD Vance said.

Anton Gerashchenko

124,435 просмотров • 1 год назад