正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Democrats like Rep. Ritchie Torres consistently refuse to acknowledge that Americans overwhelmingly support bolstering 2A rights. Following a previous shooting, he appeared on CNN, calling it 'absolute insanity' to let 'weapons of war flow freely' and demanded a national ban, blaming 'far too many guns' for violence. According to...

MediasLies's profile picture

Media Lies

305,699 subscribers

37,369 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Rep. Jake Auchincloss to Fox: Donald Trump is historically unpopular with a majority of Americans. His character is morally bankrupt and Americans want the leader of this country to be someone they can respect and trust to put the country over self. Donald Trump has demonstrated over and over again he refuses to do that. His second term would be far more dangerous than his first term. Just look at what Project 2025 offers. He will refuse to listen to Congress when it comes to spending decisions. He will turn the Department of Justice into his personal law firm for retribution. He will attack basic services that Americans rely on like Medicare and Social Security and politicize them
0:42

Rep. Jake Auchincloss to Fox: Donald Trump is historically unpopular with a majority of Americans. His character is morally bankrupt and Americans want the leader of this country to be someone they can respect and trust to put the country over self. Donald Trump has demonstrated over and over again he refuses to do that. His second term would be far more dangerous than his first term. Just look at what Project 2025 offers. He will refuse to listen to Congress when it comes to spending decisions. He will turn the Department of Justice into his personal law firm for retribution. He will attack basic services that Americans rely on like Medicare and Social Security and politicize them

Headquarters

439,531 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna just EXPOSED Democrats in DC for being huge hypocrites, excoriates them for BLAMING the National Guard attack on the troops "The American people may not know this, but a majority of the members of Congress, to include Democrats, are concealed carrying in DC because of how BAD it was until Trump took over...the SAME PARTY trying to take away your gun rights are fast-tracking their own concealed carry permits!" "For them to try to justify the m*rder of this one beautiful woman, Sarah Beckstrom, is ABHORRENT!" "This country can see EXACTLY what they're doing." Anna Paulina Luna
1:15

🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna just EXPOSED Democrats in DC for being huge hypocrites, excoriates them for BLAMING the National Guard attack on the troops "The American people may not know this, but a majority of the members of Congress, to include Democrats, are concealed carrying in DC because of how BAD it was until Trump took over...the SAME PARTY trying to take away your gun rights are fast-tracking their own concealed carry permits!" "For them to try to justify the m*rder of this one beautiful woman, Sarah Beckstrom, is ABHORRENT!" "This country can see EXACTLY what they're doing." Anna Paulina Luna

Eric Daugherty

113,015 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨WATCH: A transgender lawmaker in New Hampshire compares the trans rights movement to black Americans who fought to end segregation. New Hampshire state Rep. Alice Wade (D) made the comment while advocating against a bill that would limit the use of facilities on the basis of sex and redefine the term "gender identity" in state law. "Giving rights to trans people does not take them away from others, just as giving rights to black Americans did not take them away from white Americans," Wade said. The bill in question, HB 1442, would prevent members of the opposite sex from using "gender identity" as a reason to access any space or service designated specifically for females or males. "When you look me in the eye and you say with all due respect, we need to take away your rights because trans people are inherently a threat. That is not with all due respect," Wade said to House Republicans who support the bill.
0:32

🚨WATCH: A transgender lawmaker in New Hampshire compares the trans rights movement to black Americans who fought to end segregation. New Hampshire state Rep. Alice Wade (D) made the comment while advocating against a bill that would limit the use of facilities on the basis of sex and redefine the term "gender identity" in state law. "Giving rights to trans people does not take them away from others, just as giving rights to black Americans did not take them away from white Americans," Wade said. The bill in question, HB 1442, would prevent members of the opposite sex from using "gender identity" as a reason to access any space or service designated specifically for females or males. "When you look me in the eye and you say with all due respect, we need to take away your rights because trans people are inherently a threat. That is not with all due respect," Wade said to House Republicans who support the bill.

Off The Press

191,875 次观看 • 4 个月前

The Second Amendment is quintessential to the American story. There isn’t a United States without arms, there isn’t an end to the Civil War without arms. There isn’t any meaningful resistance to the horrors of the Jim Crow era without Southern Blacks being armed against tyrannical local and state governments, despite anti-2A laws to disarm them. The irony is some of those same laws have been cited today by states such as Hawaii and North Carolina to justify firearm restrictions. Some of the most consequential moments in American history have involved firearms in some capacity. It’s a rich part of our history that shouldn’t be infringed. Despite the statistical fact that law-abiding gun owners rarely ever commit firearms related offenses, despite the fact that Americans of all backgrounds enjoy the freedoms guaranteed by the Second Amendment for a multitude of purposes, anti-Second Amendment political leaders like the governor in my state of Virginia continue restricting the rights of Virginians under the guise of public safety. If the governor and her Democratic majority truly want to address public safety, they should focus on improving the education in underserved areas, focus on expanding economic opportunities that put men to work, providing a mentorship pipeline for young men, and incentivizing stronger family units. All of those efforts would produce far better outcomes in reducing crime than violating the rights of law-abiding gun owners. So we’ll continue to enjoy this right on the range, at shooting competitions, while hunting as we challenge the state in court for its obvious violation of the second amendment. The following groups need the support of gun owners as lawsuits are extremely costly: SAF, NRA, Gun Owners of America, National Association for Gun Rights,vcdl.org, Firearms Policy Coalition, NSSF—The Firearm Industry Trade Association
1:24

The Second Amendment is quintessential to the American story. There isn’t a United States without arms, there isn’t an end to the Civil War without arms. There isn’t any meaningful resistance to the horrors of the Jim Crow era without Southern Blacks being armed against tyrannical local and state governments, despite anti-2A laws to disarm them. The irony is some of those same laws have been cited today by states such as Hawaii and North Carolina to justify firearm restrictions. Some of the most consequential moments in American history have involved firearms in some capacity. It’s a rich part of our history that shouldn’t be infringed. Despite the statistical fact that law-abiding gun owners rarely ever commit firearms related offenses, despite the fact that Americans of all backgrounds enjoy the freedoms guaranteed by the Second Amendment for a multitude of purposes, anti-Second Amendment political leaders like the governor in my state of Virginia continue restricting the rights of Virginians under the guise of public safety. If the governor and her Democratic majority truly want to address public safety, they should focus on improving the education in underserved areas, focus on expanding economic opportunities that put men to work, providing a mentorship pipeline for young men, and incentivizing stronger family units. All of those efforts would produce far better outcomes in reducing crime than violating the rights of law-abiding gun owners. So we’ll continue to enjoy this right on the range, at shooting competitions, while hunting as we challenge the state in court for its obvious violation of the second amendment. The following groups need the support of gun owners as lawsuits are extremely costly: SAF, NRA, Gun Owners of America, National Association for Gun Rights,vcdl.org, Firearms Policy Coalition, NSSF—The Firearm Industry Trade Association

Shermichael Singleton

14,702 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 BOOM! Even CNN just got destroyed by their own poll! 85% of White Americans 82% of Latinos 76% of Black Americans ALL want PHOTO ID to vote! 🇺🇸 This is a TOTAL BLOW to the Democrats' cheat machine. They don't want secure elections — they want open borders and ballot harvesting. Trump is RIGHT. Pass the SAVE America Act NOW and secure our elections! No more excuses from RINOs or Dems. Real Americans demand it. Do you support nationwide Voter ID and the SAVE Act? A. YES B. NO Drop your thoughts below and Give me a Thumbs-Up👍, if you support this! 🇺🇸
0:27

🚨 BOOM! Even CNN just got destroyed by their own poll! 85% of White Americans 82% of Latinos 76% of Black Americans ALL want PHOTO ID to vote! 🇺🇸 This is a TOTAL BLOW to the Democrats' cheat machine. They don't want secure elections — they want open borders and ballot harvesting. Trump is RIGHT. Pass the SAVE America Act NOW and secure our elections! No more excuses from RINOs or Dems. Real Americans demand it. Do you support nationwide Voter ID and the SAVE Act? A. YES B. NO Drop your thoughts below and Give me a Thumbs-Up👍, if you support this! 🇺🇸

Right Scope 🇺🇸

60,037 次观看 • 2 个月前

Gov. Walz Can’t Define “Assault Weapons” — But Wants to Ban Them Anyway Gov. Walz says he “supports legal gun ownership” — right before pushing an “assault weapons” ban he can’t even define. 🤡 “Not made for war”? Every common firearm traces its lineage to military tech. That’s not an argument — it’s a talking point. He admits “the devil’s in the details” — and he’s right. Because the details are where constitutional rights go to die. He also says he trusts trained, licensed permit holders. So why is the DFL trying to ban lawful carry at the Capitol? If permit holders are vetted and responsible — his words — why do their rights disappear near politicians? The government doesn’t get to ban commonly owned firearms because Gov. Walz thinks they look scary to him. You don’t “support legal gun ownership” while trying to outlaw the most popular rifles in America. Minnesotans see the contradiction. And we’re not buying it. 💥 ⚡ TAKE ACTION: 📝 SIGN A PETITION: ✊ JOIN THE FIGHT: 🛡️ BECOME A 2A DEFENDER: 💥 DONATE: #mnleg #mn2a #2A
1:37

Gov. Walz Can’t Define “Assault Weapons” — But Wants to Ban Them Anyway Gov. Walz says he “supports legal gun ownership” — right before pushing an “assault weapons” ban he can’t even define. 🤡 “Not made for war”? Every common firearm traces its lineage to military tech. That’s not an argument — it’s a talking point. He admits “the devil’s in the details” — and he’s right. Because the details are where constitutional rights go to die. He also says he trusts trained, licensed permit holders. So why is the DFL trying to ban lawful carry at the Capitol? If permit holders are vetted and responsible — his words — why do their rights disappear near politicians? The government doesn’t get to ban commonly owned firearms because Gov. Walz thinks they look scary to him. You don’t “support legal gun ownership” while trying to outlaw the most popular rifles in America. Minnesotans see the contradiction. And we’re not buying it. 💥 ⚡ TAKE ACTION: 📝 SIGN A PETITION: ✊ JOIN THE FIGHT: 🛡️ BECOME A 2A DEFENDER: 💥 DONATE: #mnleg #mn2a #2A

MN Gun Owners Caucus

28,292 次观看 • 5 个月前

Michigan Governor Whitmers RedFlag Gun Confiscation Scheme has been a Disastrous success in taking Michiganders Constitutionally Protected 2nd Amendment Right & completely Violating several Constitutional Rights from Law abiding Americans. Michigan RedFlag's have been Not only taking the #2A rights from those those that have the Extreme Risk Protection Order place on them (Based solely on If's & Maybe's "at Some point") But also taking the Gun Rights away from those it has Nothing to do with the ERPO's Tom Lambert of Michigan Open Carry addresses Michigan House Judiciary Committee Hearing in support of HB 4138, 4139, and 4140 to repeal Michigan's "Red Flag Laws" CALL your Michigan Representatives & Demand they Repeal the Infringements!
13:27

Michigan Governor Whitmers RedFlag Gun Confiscation Scheme has been a Disastrous success in taking Michiganders Constitutionally Protected 2nd Amendment Right & completely Violating several Constitutional Rights from Law abiding Americans. Michigan RedFlag's have been Not only taking the #2A rights from those those that have the Extreme Risk Protection Order place on them (Based solely on If's & Maybe's "at Some point") But also taking the Gun Rights away from those it has Nothing to do with the ERPO's Tom Lambert of Michigan Open Carry addresses Michigan House Judiciary Committee Hearing in support of HB 4138, 4139, and 4140 to repeal Michigan's "Red Flag Laws" CALL your Michigan Representatives & Demand they Repeal the Infringements!

𝕊𝕥𝕖𝕧𝕖𝕟 𝕄. 𝕃𝕖𝕘𝕒𝕔𝕪 🇺🇸

58,705 次观看 • 7 个月前

Senate Leader John Thune announces the Save America Act will be voted on next week “I will be bringing the Save America Act to the floor and we'll be having a full and robust debate” “Americans overwhelmingly agree that voters should have to show ID at the polls, 83% of Americans in an August, 2025 poll, supported requiring photo ID at the polls for all voters. That includes: - 71% of Democrats - 76% of black Americans - 77% of Asian Americans - 82% of Hispanic Americans It kind of feels like the only Americans not to support voter ID requirements are Democrats here in Congress.” “At the core of the Save America Act is the requirement that individuals provide proof of citizenship to register to vote, and then show an ID when they go to the polls. In other words, it would require Americans to demonstrate that they're eligible to vote and that they are who they say they are when they go to do so — it's pretty common sense” “We require photo ID for a whole lot of things in this country for obvious reasons. Getting on a plane show your official government-issued photo. Id go to the doctor, same thing. Provide your government-issued photo ID plus your insurance card, get hired for a new job, provide your government-issued photo id. When you start mr. President, public libraries, ask for a photo ID in New York City. You have to provide some type of photo ID to get a library card” “I can really see only 2 reasons for Democrats opposing this legislation: - Either Democrats are just reflexively opposing this proposal because it originated from Republicans - Or Democrats believe that there are in fact people out there voting illegally and that it's benefiting Democrats and they wanna keep it going I honestly cannot think of another reason to oppose something so imminently reasonable as requiring people to demonstrate that they're eligible to vote and that they are who they say they are when they go to the polls”
4:54

Senate Leader John Thune announces the Save America Act will be voted on next week “I will be bringing the Save America Act to the floor and we'll be having a full and robust debate” “Americans overwhelmingly agree that voters should have to show ID at the polls, 83% of Americans in an August, 2025 poll, supported requiring photo ID at the polls for all voters. That includes: - 71% of Democrats - 76% of black Americans - 77% of Asian Americans - 82% of Hispanic Americans It kind of feels like the only Americans not to support voter ID requirements are Democrats here in Congress.” “At the core of the Save America Act is the requirement that individuals provide proof of citizenship to register to vote, and then show an ID when they go to the polls. In other words, it would require Americans to demonstrate that they're eligible to vote and that they are who they say they are when they go to do so — it's pretty common sense” “We require photo ID for a whole lot of things in this country for obvious reasons. Getting on a plane show your official government-issued photo. Id go to the doctor, same thing. Provide your government-issued photo ID plus your insurance card, get hired for a new job, provide your government-issued photo id. When you start mr. President, public libraries, ask for a photo ID in New York City. You have to provide some type of photo ID to get a library card” “I can really see only 2 reasons for Democrats opposing this legislation: - Either Democrats are just reflexively opposing this proposal because it originated from Republicans - Or Democrats believe that there are in fact people out there voting illegally and that it's benefiting Democrats and they wanna keep it going I honestly cannot think of another reason to oppose something so imminently reasonable as requiring people to demonstrate that they're eligible to vote and that they are who they say they are when they go to the polls”

Wall Street Apes

25,135 次观看 • 4 个月前

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.
5:49

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.

Thomas Massie

229,372 次观看 • 1 年前

The statist gun grabbers at Everytown attempt to make a video on the dangers of a bill that would make states recognize out of state concealed carry licenses (just like they already have to do for drivers licenses) but it just turns into an ad for why this bill should be passed. Essentially their argument is that Florida & Texas should have to recognize illegal invader "No Name Given"'s CDL and allow them to drive 80,000lb vehicles on busy highways but California & Massachusetts shouldn't have to recognize the Constitutional rights of out of state American citizens 🤡🌎 More freedom when traveling? Sounds great. Let's do that 🇺🇸 #2nd #2A #backfire #liberty #CivilRights
1:06

The statist gun grabbers at Everytown attempt to make a video on the dangers of a bill that would make states recognize out of state concealed carry licenses (just like they already have to do for drivers licenses) but it just turns into an ad for why this bill should be passed. Essentially their argument is that Florida & Texas should have to recognize illegal invader "No Name Given"'s CDL and allow them to drive 80,000lb vehicles on busy highways but California & Massachusetts shouldn't have to recognize the Constitutional rights of out of state American citizens 🤡🌎 More freedom when traveling? Sounds great. Let's do that 🇺🇸 #2nd #2A #backfire #liberty #CivilRights

Mrgunsngear

57,762 次观看 • 8 个月前

So The ATF Follows Law Abiding Americans Home From Gun Shows But They’re Allowing Illegal Immigrants To Purchase & Carry Guns Now 🚨 “My husband owns a gun shop, and he just called me to tell me that the ATF has made updates to their background check policy. And effective today, they give an exemption to illegal immigrants to be able to purchase firearms. Now this strangely coincides with, uh, California, New York, and Chicago making it legal for illegals to be police officers. Tell me our government isn't about to pull some shenanigans, without telling me our government's about to pull some shenanigans.”
0:37

So The ATF Follows Law Abiding Americans Home From Gun Shows But They’re Allowing Illegal Immigrants To Purchase & Carry Guns Now 🚨 “My husband owns a gun shop, and he just called me to tell me that the ATF has made updates to their background check policy. And effective today, they give an exemption to illegal immigrants to be able to purchase firearms. Now this strangely coincides with, uh, California, New York, and Chicago making it legal for illegals to be police officers. Tell me our government isn't about to pull some shenanigans, without telling me our government's about to pull some shenanigans.”

🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️

12,084 次观看 • 2 年前

President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he did not think Alex Pretti, the second U.S. citizen to be killed by federal forces in Minnesota this month, was acting as an assassin. "You can't have guns. You can't walk in with guns," the president said in response to a question from PBS News' Liz Landers (Liz Landers), reiterating a talking point from the administration that Pretti should not have brought a legally carried handgun to the scene — a position that has infuriated gun rights advocates. The president's response amounted to a softening of his administration's tone on the Jan. 24 shooting, after several of his top aides, including White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, described Pretti as a threat to federal agents. Following Pretti's death, gun rights groups have released statements, saying that it's legal to carry firearms during protests or while exercising First Amendment rights. Landers asked Trump about the Second Amendment, which protects the right to keep and bear arms. "It's a very unfortunate incident," Trump said, shortly before departing the White House for a planned speech in Iowa.
1:02

President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he did not think Alex Pretti, the second U.S. citizen to be killed by federal forces in Minnesota this month, was acting as an assassin. "You can't have guns. You can't walk in with guns," the president said in response to a question from PBS News' Liz Landers (Liz Landers), reiterating a talking point from the administration that Pretti should not have brought a legally carried handgun to the scene — a position that has infuriated gun rights advocates. The president's response amounted to a softening of his administration's tone on the Jan. 24 shooting, after several of his top aides, including White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, described Pretti as a threat to federal agents. Following Pretti's death, gun rights groups have released statements, saying that it's legal to carry firearms during protests or while exercising First Amendment rights. Landers asked Trump about the Second Amendment, which protects the right to keep and bear arms. "It's a very unfortunate incident," Trump said, shortly before departing the White House for a planned speech in Iowa.

PBS News

38,804 次观看 • 6 个月前

So The ATF Follows Law Abiding Americans Home From Gun Shows But They’re Allowing Illegal Immigrants To Purchase & Carry Guns Now 🚨 “My husband owns a gun shop, and he just called me to tell me that the ATF has made updates to their background check policy. And effective today, they give an exemption to illegal immigrants to be able to purchase firearms. Now this strangely coincides with, uh, California, New York, and Chicago making it legal for illegals to be police officers. Tell me our government isn't about to pull some shenanigans, without telling me our government's about to pull some shenanigans.”
0:37

So The ATF Follows Law Abiding Americans Home From Gun Shows But They’re Allowing Illegal Immigrants To Purchase & Carry Guns Now 🚨 “My husband owns a gun shop, and he just called me to tell me that the ATF has made updates to their background check policy. And effective today, they give an exemption to illegal immigrants to be able to purchase firearms. Now this strangely coincides with, uh, California, New York, and Chicago making it legal for illegals to be police officers. Tell me our government isn't about to pull some shenanigans, without telling me our government's about to pull some shenanigans.”

Wall Street Apes

1,037,584 次观看 • 2 年前

Thomas Massie is sounding the alarm. Congress is on the brink of passing a liability shield for pesticide companies, like Bayer, who give Americans cancer. Bayer is a foreign company, but Congress wants to give them total immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate. “This is not to grant farmers’ immunity.” “This is to grant the corporations immunity.” “If farmers contract a form of cancer or non-Hodgson’s lymphoma from this chemical, if this makes it into the Farm Bill, you won’t be able to sue for that.” This liability shield would be a complete betrayal of the MAHA movement. But House Republicans are on the brink of passing it anyway, and President Trump is urging them to do it. There is still time to fight back. We need all hands on deck to stop this. Here’s how you can take action: Use the link below for a step-by-step guide to urge Congress to remove Sections 10205, 10206, 10207 and portions of 10201 from the Farm Bill in order to preserve Americans’ right to sue pesticide companies when their products poison us:🧵 Thomas Massie
0:33

Thomas Massie is sounding the alarm. Congress is on the brink of passing a liability shield for pesticide companies, like Bayer, who give Americans cancer. Bayer is a foreign company, but Congress wants to give them total immunity to mass poison Americans with glyphosate. “This is not to grant farmers’ immunity.” “This is to grant the corporations immunity.” “If farmers contract a form of cancer or non-Hodgson’s lymphoma from this chemical, if this makes it into the Farm Bill, you won’t be able to sue for that.” This liability shield would be a complete betrayal of the MAHA movement. But House Republicans are on the brink of passing it anyway, and President Trump is urging them to do it. There is still time to fight back. We need all hands on deck to stop this. Here’s how you can take action: Use the link below for a step-by-step guide to urge Congress to remove Sections 10205, 10206, 10207 and portions of 10201 from the Farm Bill in order to preserve Americans’ right to sue pesticide companies when their products poison us:🧵 Thomas Massie

Stand for Health Freedom

435,799 次观看 • 4 个月前

🇺🇸 The U.S. has more guns than people... wait... what?! There are 120 guns for every 100 people, and a household of 5 statistically owns around 6 of them. Most countries treat gun ownership as something the state permits. America treats it as something the state can't take away, and that gap comes down to a 250-year-old revolution. The Second Amendment was written by people who had just used privately owned weapons to overthrow a government, and who built their entire national identity around the idea that an armed citizenry is the last line of defense against tyranny. Frontier survival culture reinforced it further. For generations, a gun was a tool you needed to eat and stay alive. That history is why gun ownership in America sits in a completely different cultural category than anywhere else on earth. Source: Wall Street Research Center
1:11

🇺🇸 The U.S. has more guns than people... wait... what?! There are 120 guns for every 100 people, and a household of 5 statistically owns around 6 of them. Most countries treat gun ownership as something the state permits. America treats it as something the state can't take away, and that gap comes down to a 250-year-old revolution. The Second Amendment was written by people who had just used privately owned weapons to overthrow a government, and who built their entire national identity around the idea that an armed citizenry is the last line of defense against tyranny. Frontier survival culture reinforced it further. For generations, a gun was a tool you needed to eat and stay alive. That history is why gun ownership in America sits in a completely different cultural category than anywhere else on earth. Source: Wall Street Research Center

Mario Nawfal

20,111 次观看 • 2 个月前

“We need to recognize that we love our children more than we love our guns”: Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey is calling for action, including assault weapons bans, in the wake of a shooting that killed two young children, ages 8 and 10, and injured 17 other people at a church in his city on Wednesday. “We have far too many guns coming into cities around the country and we need to do something about it, not just sit back on hands and say, ‘thoughts and prayers.’”
7:38

“We need to recognize that we love our children more than we love our guns”: Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey is calling for action, including assault weapons bans, in the wake of a shooting that killed two young children, ages 8 and 10, and injured 17 other people at a church in his city on Wednesday. “We have far too many guns coming into cities around the country and we need to do something about it, not just sit back on hands and say, ‘thoughts and prayers.’”

CBS Mornings

11,219 次观看 • 11 个月前

WOW: Benny Johnson asks Karoline Leavitt to respond to Nancy Pelosi’s attack on Trump for securing D.C.—and she WENT OFF. Benny Johnson: “Nancy Pelosi has attacked the president for deploying the National Guard to the city, saying that it is to cover for his incompetence. Hillary Clinton has also attacked the president for securing the city of Washington, D.C.—I’d like a response to Nancy Pelosi.” Leavitt: “I think it’s DESPICABLE that Democrats cannot agree that we need more law and order in a city that has been ravaged by violence, crime, murders, property theft.” “This should be a winning issue for all Americans. I don’t understand.” “Anything President Trump does, the Democrats want to disagree with.” “I think the president would love to work with Democrats on this issue to bring law and order to America, but unfortunately they have FAILED, and that’s why he has taken this historic action to federalize the National Guard.”
1:50

WOW: Benny Johnson asks Karoline Leavitt to respond to Nancy Pelosi’s attack on Trump for securing D.C.—and she WENT OFF. Benny Johnson: “Nancy Pelosi has attacked the president for deploying the National Guard to the city, saying that it is to cover for his incompetence. Hillary Clinton has also attacked the president for securing the city of Washington, D.C.—I’d like a response to Nancy Pelosi.” Leavitt: “I think it’s DESPICABLE that Democrats cannot agree that we need more law and order in a city that has been ravaged by violence, crime, murders, property theft.” “This should be a winning issue for all Americans. I don’t understand.” “Anything President Trump does, the Democrats want to disagree with.” “I think the president would love to work with Democrats on this issue to bring law and order to America, but unfortunately they have FAILED, and that’s why he has taken this historic action to federalize the National Guard.”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

717,956 次观看 • 11 个月前

Wow, Bari Weiss's CBS News deceptively cut out the part of this interview where Netanyahu clarified that rather than get "aid" from the US, he wants us to have a so-called "partnership." "I want to draw [the aid] down, and then I want to suggest projects, joint projects for intel, for weapons, for missile defense." What he's describing is taking military tech such as missile defense—which we funded—and then selling it back to us as some sort of "partnership." This isn't just missing from the clip below, it was chopped out of the full show too w/o any clear cuts. Note too, he says he wants to "start now" and not wait for the "next Congress"—that's because he knows the American people don't want to give Israel a dime.
0:30

Wow, Bari Weiss's CBS News deceptively cut out the part of this interview where Netanyahu clarified that rather than get "aid" from the US, he wants us to have a so-called "partnership." "I want to draw [the aid] down, and then I want to suggest projects, joint projects for intel, for weapons, for missile defense." What he's describing is taking military tech such as missile defense—which we funded—and then selling it back to us as some sort of "partnership." This isn't just missing from the clip below, it was chopped out of the full show too w/o any clear cuts. Note too, he says he wants to "start now" and not wait for the "next Congress"—that's because he knows the American people don't want to give Israel a dime.

Chris Menahan 🇺🇸

357,187 次观看 • 2 个月前