正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Deng Xiaoping’s Deadliest Mistake: How One Policy Destroyed China’s Future. China’s Population Crisis Was Engineered. I was born in the 1980s. The only child of two brilliant, hardworking Chinese parents—not because they didn’t want more kids, but because they weren’t allowed to. China’s One Child Policy made that decision... show more

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

46,404 subscribers

60,403 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Why doesn’t the math, math when it comes to China’s one child policy?

Why doesn’t the math, math when it comes to China’s one child policy?

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

56,403 次观看 • 3 个月前

Ricky Fulton taking the rise out of Rangers' unwritten 'policy.' If ever there was a self-defeating policy it was that one, one can only imagine the good players they missed out on because of it.

Ricky Fulton taking the rise out of Rangers' unwritten 'policy.' If ever there was a self-defeating policy it was that one, one can only imagine the good players they missed out on because of it.

Lisbon Lion

72,649 次观看 • 7 个月前

Japan’s Rare-Earth Discovery Is a Strategic Nightmare for China. How Japan Quietly Undermined China’s Most Effective Weapon and Sent China Panicking. In this video, I break down why Japan’s discovery of massive deep-sea rare-earth resources inside its own territory is a strategic blow to China’s supply-chain leverage — and why the usual argument that “China still controls refining” completely misses the point. We’ll cover: • Why China’s rare-earth dominance was a policy choice, not destiny • Why refining is a solvable political and capital problem, not a Chinese monopoly • What this means for U.S.–Japan security, deterrence, and the future of supply chains

Japan’s Rare-Earth Discovery Is a Strategic Nightmare for China. How Japan Quietly Undermined China’s Most Effective Weapon and Sent China Panicking. In this video, I break down why Japan’s discovery of massive deep-sea rare-earth resources inside its own territory is a strategic blow to China’s supply-chain leverage — and why the usual argument that “China still controls refining” completely misses the point. We’ll cover: • Why China’s rare-earth dominance was a policy choice, not destiny • Why refining is a solvable political and capital problem, not a Chinese monopoly • What this means for U.S.–Japan security, deterrence, and the future of supply chains

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

118,027 次观看 • 5 个月前

Paul Ehrlich says in 2022 that China’s one-child policy “didn’t go far enough.” "It helped China reduce it's overpopulation or population growth, but still not far enough. The Chinese are now planning to destroy the world by paving and putting automobiles on it by their program connecting Europe and China. But at least the Chinese looked at the problems and tried to do something about it unlike the U.S., where the republicans looked at the problem and tried to make it worse, and are succeeding."

Paul Ehrlich says in 2022 that China’s one-child policy “didn’t go far enough.” "It helped China reduce it's overpopulation or population growth, but still not far enough. The Chinese are now planning to destroy the world by paving and putting automobiles on it by their program connecting Europe and China. But at least the Chinese looked at the problems and tried to do something about it unlike the U.S., where the republicans looked at the problem and tried to make it worse, and are succeeding."

KanekoaTheGreat

39,343 次观看 • 3 个月前

Bill Maher: “We got Elon Musk. He was [in China] in a suit. You don’t see that very often. That shows the respect Elon has for the Chinese leadership and out of respect for the one-child rule… while he was in China for two days, Elon only fathered one child.”

Bill Maher: “We got Elon Musk. He was [in China] in a suit. You don’t see that very often. That shows the respect Elon has for the Chinese leadership and out of respect for the one-child rule… while he was in China for two days, Elon only fathered one child.”

RedWave Press

700,805 次观看 • 1 个月前

Gordon Chang Wasn’t Wrong about China's Collapse—He Was Just Early. For years, people thought Gordon Chang was wrong for predicting the collapse of China. In this video, I break down why Gordon Chang wasn’t wrong—he was just early. From the bursting of China’s real estate bubble (Evergrande, Country Garden) to Xi Jinping’s authoritarian missteps, everything Gordon warned about is now unfolding in real time. This is not just another “China doomer” video. I share personal stories about being ridiculed for calling out China’s property crash years ago—until the cracks became too big to ignore. I compare China Inc. to a hyped-up stock with bad fundamentals, one that eventually crashes under the weight of its own lies. Just like the CCP’s one-party rule under Deng Xiaoping and Hu Jintao worked—until Xi Jinping broke it.

Gordon Chang Wasn’t Wrong about China's Collapse—He Was Just Early. For years, people thought Gordon Chang was wrong for predicting the collapse of China. In this video, I break down why Gordon Chang wasn’t wrong—he was just early. From the bursting of China’s real estate bubble (Evergrande, Country Garden) to Xi Jinping’s authoritarian missteps, everything Gordon warned about is now unfolding in real time. This is not just another “China doomer” video. I share personal stories about being ridiculed for calling out China’s property crash years ago—until the cracks became too big to ignore. I compare China Inc. to a hyped-up stock with bad fundamentals, one that eventually crashes under the weight of its own lies. Just like the CCP’s one-party rule under Deng Xiaoping and Hu Jintao worked—until Xi Jinping broke it.

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

47,144 次观看 • 5 个月前

Logan O'Hoppe says the Angels cell phone policy was a group decision, and Ron Washington was just the one to deliver the message. "There was not one dude that was not on board with it."

Logan O'Hoppe says the Angels cell phone policy was a group decision, and Ron Washington was just the one to deliver the message. "There was not one dude that was not on board with it."

Foul Territory

281,759 次观看 • 1 年前

‘ One by one the migrants were taken off the plane because they were able to secure injunctions from the Strasbourg Court… ’ On this week’s Planet Normal Suella Braverman MP tells Liam Halligan and Allison Pearson why it was a mistake for The Labour Party to scrap the Rwanda Policy 🎧👉

‘ One by one the migrants were taken off the plane because they were able to secure injunctions from the Strasbourg Court… ’ On this week’s Planet Normal Suella Braverman MP tells Liam Halligan and Allison Pearson why it was a mistake for The Labour Party to scrap the Rwanda Policy 🎧👉

The Telegraph

15,528 次观看 • 10 个月前

China is massively lying about their population. It is not 1.4 billion people. It may be as low at 600 million. In 1950 the population of China was estimated at 530 to 540 million, when the CCP took control. It requires a fertility rate of 3.3 to triple the population in 50 years. In 1959 the great famine in China resulted in an estimated 30 million deaths. From 1979 to 2015 China had a one child policy. Mathematically, there is simply no way for the population to have grown from 540 million to 1.4 billion between 1950 and 2020. China is rapidly aging due to the one child policy which was too successful. China has a long history of publishing fake economic data. There is zero reason to assume their official population data is accurate.

China is massively lying about their population. It is not 1.4 billion people. It may be as low at 600 million. In 1950 the population of China was estimated at 530 to 540 million, when the CCP took control. It requires a fertility rate of 3.3 to triple the population in 50 years. In 1959 the great famine in China resulted in an estimated 30 million deaths. From 1979 to 2015 China had a one child policy. Mathematically, there is simply no way for the population to have grown from 540 million to 1.4 billion between 1950 and 2020. China is rapidly aging due to the one child policy which was too successful. China has a long history of publishing fake economic data. There is zero reason to assume their official population data is accurate.

Wall Street Mav

2,858,463 次观看 • 8 个月前

You were fed anti-child propaganda to believe one or two kids is “responsible” and a big family is radical. Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger promoted a one-to-two-child policy. She had a vision: ideally, she wanted the government to monitor birth rates and limit families to only one or two children. Ultimately, the strategy became mass indoctrination through anti-child propaganda in the education system and the widespread institutionalization of the birth control pill. Population control was the goal. Now, people think having 9 kids, like Kelli Ingram, is radical. Listen to E323 of The Lila Rose Show to hear more.

You were fed anti-child propaganda to believe one or two kids is “responsible” and a big family is radical. Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger promoted a one-to-two-child policy. She had a vision: ideally, she wanted the government to monitor birth rates and limit families to only one or two children. Ultimately, the strategy became mass indoctrination through anti-child propaganda in the education system and the widespread institutionalization of the birth control pill. Population control was the goal. Now, people think having 9 kids, like Kelli Ingram, is radical. Listen to E323 of The Lila Rose Show to hear more.

Lila Rose

38,617 次观看 • 1 个月前

Reminder - In 2011, Bill Gates used his platform at the WHO to launch his "Decade of Vaccines," declaring the goal was to ensure "every child" was vaccinated. His foundation, a top WHO donor, funded the policy. It funded GAVI, the buyer. It funded manufacturers like the Serum Institute. When one entity shapes the policy, market, and goal for every child on earth, is that global health or a concerning consolidation of power?

Reminder - In 2011, Bill Gates used his platform at the WHO to launch his "Decade of Vaccines," declaring the goal was to ensure "every child" was vaccinated. His foundation, a top WHO donor, funded the policy. It funded GAVI, the buyer. It funded manufacturers like the Serum Institute. When one entity shapes the policy, market, and goal for every child on earth, is that global health or a concerning consolidation of power?

Camus

38,075 次观看 • 8 个月前

A poor Hindu family in Pratapgarh gave their son to a relative, saying they would take him back once they became financially stable. That relative gave the child to a Muslims in Delhi, where his name was changed from Samar to Mohammad Ali. The child was forced to eat Gau-mans and was taught namaz and Islamic rituals. Now the desperate parents want their son back, but no one is helping them.

A poor Hindu family in Pratapgarh gave their son to a relative, saying they would take him back once they became financially stable. That relative gave the child to a Muslims in Delhi, where his name was changed from Samar to Mohammad Ali. The child was forced to eat Gau-mans and was taught namaz and Islamic rituals. Now the desperate parents want their son back, but no one is helping them.

Team Hindu United

17,686 次观看 • 3 个月前

Pompeo: For 40 years, our policy was to sell more stuff into China and hope China would become more like us. That was wrong. Of all the hostile leaders I dealt with, the Chinese Communist Party is the one that can actually change the way we live. 1/

Pompeo: For 40 years, our policy was to sell more stuff into China and hope China would become more like us. That was wrong. Of all the hostile leaders I dealt with, the Chinese Communist Party is the one that can actually change the way we live. 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

82,403 次观看 • 1 个月前

John Swinney struggled to complete an answer when interviewed by Nick Robinson on the SNP's food price cap policy. He was allowed to answer the first question fully and that was it. At one point Robinson interrupted an answer to play a clip of someone attacking the policy. The BBC is going to launch an all-out assault on this policy because it's difficult for the UK Labour Govt.

John Swinney struggled to complete an answer when interviewed by Nick Robinson on the SNP's food price cap policy. He was allowed to answer the first question fully and that was it. At one point Robinson interrupted an answer to play a clip of someone attacking the policy. The BBC is going to launch an all-out assault on this policy because it's difficult for the UK Labour Govt.

MSM Monitor

30,557 次观看 • 1 个月前

One of the reasons why homelessness is down for the first time in years in L.A. is because we have aggressively worked to end bad policy and remove systemic barriers that forced people to live on the street. We are bucking nationwide trends as a result.

One of the reasons why homelessness is down for the first time in years in L.A. is because we have aggressively worked to end bad policy and remove systemic barriers that forced people to live on the street. We are bucking nationwide trends as a result.

Mayor Karen Bass

98,600 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨John Mearsheimer: This will be long seen as the most foolish foreign policy decision the United States has ever made. Council on Foreign Relations did a big study a few months ago where they surveyed American diplomatic historians and they asked them what was the most foolish foreign policy decision that any president in the history of the United States had ever made? And what was clearly ranked number one was George W. Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003. There is absolutely no question in my mind that the decision to attack Iran on February twenty-eighth will be seen as a much worse decision than the decision to invade Iraq in two thousand and three.

🚨John Mearsheimer: This will be long seen as the most foolish foreign policy decision the United States has ever made. Council on Foreign Relations did a big study a few months ago where they surveyed American diplomatic historians and they asked them what was the most foolish foreign policy decision that any president in the history of the United States had ever made? And what was clearly ranked number one was George W. Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003. There is absolutely no question in my mind that the decision to attack Iran on February twenty-eighth will be seen as a much worse decision than the decision to invade Iraq in two thousand and three.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

17,976 次观看 • 2 个月前