Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Denims comments on the Emiru & Mizkif situation Says she’ll continue to believe Emiru for now but is very worried about the ramifications for everyone (especially women) if the lawsuit reveals certain info “I want to believe so..but if any of the lawsuit brings things out that she’s lied...

Awk20000's profile picture

yeet

162,108 subscribers

92,100 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNachrichten & PolitikGesundheit & Wellness
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Mizkif CALLED OUT creators for still associating with Emiru after allegations and said it’s DESTROYING his reputation 😳👀 “She lied about SA… completely lied about it. And people are still hanging out with her.” “Any creator still associating with her after that… it’s disgusting to me.” “She called me a stalker in front of millions… that ruins your life, people don’t want to associate with you after that.” “I’ve been reaching out to creators to come on stream… but because of this situation, most conversations just shut down immediately.”
1:20

Mizkif CALLED OUT creators for still associating with Emiru after allegations and said it’s DESTROYING his reputation 😳👀 “She lied about SA… completely lied about it. And people are still hanging out with her.” “Any creator still associating with her after that… it’s disgusting to me.” “She called me a stalker in front of millions… that ruins your life, people don’t want to associate with you after that.” “I’ve been reaching out to creators to come on stream… but because of this situation, most conversations just shut down immediately.”

Hiastra

27,178 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Asmongold addresses why he hasn't watched or reacted to Mizkif's new video about "Emiru Lied," saying he doesn't want to jeopardize his defense in the defamation lawsuit filed by Mizkif 👀 “I saw everything that happened, but I'm not gonna be making any comments at all until the lawsuit is over. But I just want people to understand that I did see it”
0:50

Asmongold addresses why he hasn't watched or reacted to Mizkif's new video about "Emiru Lied," saying he doesn't want to jeopardize his defense in the defamation lawsuit filed by Mizkif 👀 “I saw everything that happened, but I'm not gonna be making any comments at all until the lawsuit is over. But I just want people to understand that I did see it”

Prism

153,397 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Destiny explains why the Emiru allegations against Mizkif are harder to believe 👀 "I don't know how it works in a court environment but in a personal environment it heavily undermines the claim..." "You're the one that is setting up the cause and effect and then we're finding out that you lied about the effect, which I think it's fair then to make you doubt the cause"
1:35

Destiny explains why the Emiru allegations against Mizkif are harder to believe 👀 "I don't know how it works in a court environment but in a personal environment it heavily undermines the claim..." "You're the one that is setting up the cause and effect and then we're finding out that you lied about the effect, which I think it's fair then to make you doubt the cause"

Deltaa

65,956 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Destiny LOSES IT and can't seem to believe the reason Emiru gave for wiping her PC around the Mizkif lawsuit 🫢 "This statement is either a lie, or it's like the most ret---ed thing I've ever heard on my entire life..." "Okay I just don't watch her streams normally, so I don't know if she normally acts like this, but like just on a... if I have an ordinary basis, this is a person lying 1 trillion percent, but some people have their own quirks with how they speak and things that they say..."
5:37

Destiny LOSES IT and can't seem to believe the reason Emiru gave for wiping her PC around the Mizkif lawsuit 🫢 "This statement is either a lie, or it's like the most ret---ed thing I've ever heard on my entire life..." "Okay I just don't watch her streams normally, so I don't know if she normally acts like this, but like just on a... if I have an ordinary basis, this is a person lying 1 trillion percent, but some people have their own quirks with how they speak and things that they say..."

Deltaa

321,206 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Henry Resilient goes over the summary of the argument in Mizkif’s lawyer’s response to Emiru’s motion to dismiss “Emiru lied her way into this lawsuit. The law won’t allow her to lie her way out..cannot credibly claim that she did not accuse Mizkif of SA..‘emotional truth’ is not a recognized defense to defamation in Texas”
1:53

Henry Resilient goes over the summary of the argument in Mizkif’s lawyer’s response to Emiru’s motion to dismiss “Emiru lied her way into this lawsuit. The law won’t allow her to lie her way out..cannot credibly claim that she did not accuse Mizkif of SA..‘emotional truth’ is not a recognized defense to defamation in Texas”

yeet

66,598 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Wow this customer went in to have her Apple watch synched up with her phone, and for some reason, the manager, (Ethan) wound up erasing all of her photos, work documents, everything, and set the phone back to factory reset. The worst part of this is when she confronts him about it he denies it, blames her for it all while slurring his words. This has to be one of the weirdest confrontations I’ve ever seen. It’s believed that he was drunk. The customer then asks to speak to someone over him, and he just flat out says no. In the end he was fired, unfortunately, the customer was not given any kind of compensation. I do believe she should have been able to get her information back on the phone if it’s in the cloud, but maybe I’m wrong about that.?
1:39

Wow this customer went in to have her Apple watch synched up with her phone, and for some reason, the manager, (Ethan) wound up erasing all of her photos, work documents, everything, and set the phone back to factory reset. The worst part of this is when she confronts him about it he denies it, blames her for it all while slurring his words. This has to be one of the weirdest confrontations I’ve ever seen. It’s believed that he was drunk. The customer then asks to speak to someone over him, and he just flat out says no. In the end he was fired, unfortunately, the customer was not given any kind of compensation. I do believe she should have been able to get her information back on the phone if it’s in the cloud, but maybe I’m wrong about that.?

Leah Rain ✝️🇺🇸🎸🏝️

66,320 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Is Candace Only In It For The Money? I don't believe Candace Owens is investigating or speaking about the Charlie Kirk narrative "for the money." In this clip with Viva Frei I explain why I believe Candace would have actually made much more money in the long term by accepting the official story and saying nothing. My belief is that the temporary increase in attention and profitability has an objective conclusion as it relates to this topic. In the end, if it turned out that she was flat out wrong about everything, it would severely affect her earning potential and trustworthiness in the future. It is for this reason that I disagree with the premise that she is purely profit/attention motivated. The downside risk of being categorically wrong would make the temporary spike not worth the future risk. I believe she would have earned more in the aggregate over time by saying nothing. I find the "she's only in it for money" objection to her investigation to be inaccurate for this reason. This was a great discussion that covered far more than just this topic, but this was an interesting back and forth. Many people will meet this clip with criticism, and that's OK. But to me, this is the most logical business-minded reaction to why I think she's not just doing it for money. There are other reasons I believe this, but this a more income potential/business-minded breakdown of my disagreement with that criticism.
1:41

Is Candace Only In It For The Money? I don't believe Candace Owens is investigating or speaking about the Charlie Kirk narrative "for the money." In this clip with Viva Frei I explain why I believe Candace would have actually made much more money in the long term by accepting the official story and saying nothing. My belief is that the temporary increase in attention and profitability has an objective conclusion as it relates to this topic. In the end, if it turned out that she was flat out wrong about everything, it would severely affect her earning potential and trustworthiness in the future. It is for this reason that I disagree with the premise that she is purely profit/attention motivated. The downside risk of being categorically wrong would make the temporary spike not worth the future risk. I believe she would have earned more in the aggregate over time by saying nothing. I find the "she's only in it for money" objection to her investigation to be inaccurate for this reason. This was a great discussion that covered far more than just this topic, but this was an interesting back and forth. Many people will meet this clip with criticism, and that's OK. But to me, this is the most logical business-minded reaction to why I think she's not just doing it for money. There are other reasons I believe this, but this a more income potential/business-minded breakdown of my disagreement with that criticism.

Bobby Sauce

31,061 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Obama: And that is the story I believe in, Virginia. I believe in America in which we all deserve equal protection under the law and nobody is above the law. I believe in an America where we don't fear each other. But look out for each other. And if we want that story to continue. If we believe in that better story. We need leaders who believe in it too.
2:48

Obama: And that is the story I believe in, Virginia. I believe in America in which we all deserve equal protection under the law and nobody is above the law. I believe in an America where we don't fear each other. But look out for each other. And if we want that story to continue. If we believe in that better story. We need leaders who believe in it too.

Acyn

124,419 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

💥NEW: Bill O’Reilly *CLASHES* with Chris Cuomo over E. Jean Carroll DOJ probe💥 OREILLY: “The E. Jean Carroll fraud should be prosecuted … It’s SO OUTRAGEOUS that the woman testifies in a deposition under oath that nobody is helping her, no lawyer is helping her, no pro bono. And then we find out she got $7 million dollars!” CUOMO: “What does that have to do with what happened in the changing room in Macy’s?” OREILLY: “Because nobody knows what happened in the changing room. That’s what!” CUOMO: “She knows!” OREILLY: “If you’re going to do that, then I can’t help you.” CUOMO: “Do what? Respect the administration of justice?” OREILLY: “No! Believe that woman. Why would you believe that woman when she doesn’t even know what year it was?” CUOMO: “The jury listened to it and believed her!” OREILLY: “It’s a New York City jury! They hate Trump!” CUOMO: “You either respect the justice system or you don’t!” OREILLY: “I don’t respect THAT verdict! And I believe that Miss Carroll committed crimes! And I’m HAPPY the Justice Department is going after her — because she flat out LIED about who was funding this lawsuit!”
3:33

💥NEW: Bill O’Reilly *CLASHES* with Chris Cuomo over E. Jean Carroll DOJ probe💥 OREILLY: “The E. Jean Carroll fraud should be prosecuted … It’s SO OUTRAGEOUS that the woman testifies in a deposition under oath that nobody is helping her, no lawyer is helping her, no pro bono. And then we find out she got $7 million dollars!” CUOMO: “What does that have to do with what happened in the changing room in Macy’s?” OREILLY: “Because nobody knows what happened in the changing room. That’s what!” CUOMO: “She knows!” OREILLY: “If you’re going to do that, then I can’t help you.” CUOMO: “Do what? Respect the administration of justice?” OREILLY: “No! Believe that woman. Why would you believe that woman when she doesn’t even know what year it was?” CUOMO: “The jury listened to it and believed her!” OREILLY: “It’s a New York City jury! They hate Trump!” CUOMO: “You either respect the justice system or you don’t!” OREILLY: “I don’t respect THAT verdict! And I believe that Miss Carroll committed crimes! And I’m HAPPY the Justice Department is going after her — because she flat out LIED about who was funding this lawsuit!”

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

287,680 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Cardi B calls Tasha K a bald headed, obsessed, b*tch after she assumed Cardi reached out to Stefon’s alleged victim, saying the woman actually reached out to her Cardi says Tasha is in for a rude awakening (hinting at another lawsuit) if she thinks she can subliminally talk about her or the people she’s around “IDGAF where you hide that money, you gonna have to hide it in that asshole because I’m coming for it FACTS”
5:55

Cardi B calls Tasha K a bald headed, obsessed, b*tch after she assumed Cardi reached out to Stefon’s alleged victim, saying the woman actually reached out to her Cardi says Tasha is in for a rude awakening (hinting at another lawsuit) if she thinks she can subliminally talk about her or the people she’s around “IDGAF where you hide that money, you gonna have to hide it in that asshole because I’m coming for it FACTS”

Block Topickz

263,271 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Candace Owens tripled down on calling Trump’s assassination attempts fake. She basically says that he stages them for attention and even goes so far as to say it’s become a hobby for him. She goes on to say that she doesn’t care about the details of the latest shooting near the White House but of course she still spins a conspiracy out of it anyway. You would think that after talking about Charlie’s assassination every day for the last 8 months she would know better than to downplay these kind of threats. But of course she doesn’t care if she gets someone hurt in fact I believe thats what she wants. Maybe the reason why she’s so suspicious of other people faking assassination attempts is because she faked her own. Just a guess. 🤷‍♂️
2:16

Candace Owens tripled down on calling Trump’s assassination attempts fake. She basically says that he stages them for attention and even goes so far as to say it’s become a hobby for him. She goes on to say that she doesn’t care about the details of the latest shooting near the White House but of course she still spins a conspiracy out of it anyway. You would think that after talking about Charlie’s assassination every day for the last 8 months she would know better than to downplay these kind of threats. But of course she doesn’t care if she gets someone hurt in fact I believe thats what she wants. Maybe the reason why she’s so suspicious of other people faking assassination attempts is because she faked her own. Just a guess. 🤷‍♂️

Cinema Shogun

22,774 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

#RHOSLC After Show! Most of the women don’t believe the rumour that Bronwyn’s husband, Todd, was allegedly making out with Lisa Barlow’s friend while farting. I’m sorry, but the farting part is such a wild detail to add, like so embarrassing!!! Whitney says Lisa “pulls out the most random comments.” Britani, on the other hand, was kind about the whole thing. She doesn’t believe it and says Todd is a prominent figure, adding that it would be bold for him to cheat on Bronwyn, who she calls a “bombshell.”
2:22

#RHOSLC After Show! Most of the women don’t believe the rumour that Bronwyn’s husband, Todd, was allegedly making out with Lisa Barlow’s friend while farting. I’m sorry, but the farting part is such a wild detail to add, like so embarrassing!!! Whitney says Lisa “pulls out the most random comments.” Britani, on the other hand, was kind about the whole thing. She doesn’t believe it and says Todd is a prominent figure, adding that it would be bold for him to cheat on Bronwyn, who she calls a “bombshell.”

Bye Wig Hello Drama

121,279 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Freen is… Fuang thinks she’s very detailed by nature. I have to say she’s very very detailed. She’s sensitive and sensitive to her surroundings. That’s a personal trait that impacts one’s acting (she talked about this in the start.) she cares tremendously about people around her. For example, I’m talking to Becky in a corner and Freen is doing makeup in another. But she knows what we’re talking about, takes in the details, and turns to congratulate me. She’s very in the present. She’s in the moment with everything all the time. Therefore her ‘detailed’ reactions/acting that we see, it’s because she absorbes everything around her. And our eyes are the window to our hearts. So this is the case of a personal trait affecting one’s acting. That’s one thing. More importantly, along the way, Freen found a way to enhance / add to that. Did Fuang helped bring her there? Maybe or maybe I don’t dare to claim that. For example, in some scenes she can do them well already, but I helped add in more details. I told her your character didn’t just hear that.. listen carefully, there are this and that details. And when she saw/realized that there were more than what she was initially aware of-like from 70% to 90%-just that, her acting will be even more detailed. Your eyes will show what you see or become aware of. If you ask, that’s all Fuang added on. The rest, she was able to do it on her own. This I was I meant by saying that the job of an acting coach is to pull out each actor’s skill. Because she could already it. It’s just that at that very moment, there wasn’t anyone to help her pull out more of her talent/maximize it. Something like that.
2:30

Freen is… Fuang thinks she’s very detailed by nature. I have to say she’s very very detailed. She’s sensitive and sensitive to her surroundings. That’s a personal trait that impacts one’s acting (she talked about this in the start.) she cares tremendously about people around her. For example, I’m talking to Becky in a corner and Freen is doing makeup in another. But she knows what we’re talking about, takes in the details, and turns to congratulate me. She’s very in the present. She’s in the moment with everything all the time. Therefore her ‘detailed’ reactions/acting that we see, it’s because she absorbes everything around her. And our eyes are the window to our hearts. So this is the case of a personal trait affecting one’s acting. That’s one thing. More importantly, along the way, Freen found a way to enhance / add to that. Did Fuang helped bring her there? Maybe or maybe I don’t dare to claim that. For example, in some scenes she can do them well already, but I helped add in more details. I told her your character didn’t just hear that.. listen carefully, there are this and that details. And when she saw/realized that there were more than what she was initially aware of-like from 70% to 90%-just that, her acting will be even more detailed. Your eyes will show what you see or become aware of. If you ask, that’s all Fuang added on. The rest, she was able to do it on her own. This I was I meant by saying that the job of an acting coach is to pull out each actor’s skill. Because she could already it. It’s just that at that very moment, there wasn’t anyone to help her pull out more of her talent/maximize it. Something like that.

panpan

54,785 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

KayBobo: I like Soso and want to be with her but she lied about being in a relationship. I later found out from one of the girls that she’s single #bbnaija big soso
0:57

KayBobo: I like Soso and want to be with her but she lied about being in a relationship. I later found out from one of the girls that she’s single #bbnaija big soso

Sabi Radio

46,709 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

So Blake Lively sent her 17 demands to return to work on Nov 9, 2023. She claimed it was for a safe environment for everyone. In reality, it was filled with things that gave her power over nearly every aspect of production. Not only that but she would claim retaliation if anyone did anything she deemed negative, like a change in tone or attitude. I kid you not. Justin Baldoni responded on Nov 15th that they didn’t want to sign because none of the negative things she claimed ever happened and they would be losing control of the film. Blake shot back that it was non negotiable and if they didn’t sign it she wouldn’t finish the movie and would file a lawsuit . So they were forced to agree. She tested out if her strategy to take over the movie would work and it did. This is what Blake, who was sexually harassed, afraid, feeling unsafe, and suffering mental anguish, posted on Nov. 21,2023. Mission complete.
0:30

So Blake Lively sent her 17 demands to return to work on Nov 9, 2023. She claimed it was for a safe environment for everyone. In reality, it was filled with things that gave her power over nearly every aspect of production. Not only that but she would claim retaliation if anyone did anything she deemed negative, like a change in tone or attitude. I kid you not. Justin Baldoni responded on Nov 15th that they didn’t want to sign because none of the negative things she claimed ever happened and they would be losing control of the film. Blake shot back that it was non negotiable and if they didn’t sign it she wouldn’t finish the movie and would file a lawsuit . So they were forced to agree. She tested out if her strategy to take over the movie would work and it did. This is what Blake, who was sexually harassed, afraid, feeling unsafe, and suffering mental anguish, posted on Nov. 21,2023. Mission complete.

Melanie King

378,381 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

i will never move on from the fact that brennan’s weddings vows to booth was the same letter she wrote for him when she was burried alive not knowing whether she’ll be saved or not. i believe that like booth, she also knew, right from the beginning.
1:28

i will never move on from the fact that brennan’s weddings vows to booth was the same letter she wrote for him when she was burried alive not knowing whether she’ll be saved or not. i believe that like booth, she also knew, right from the beginning.

kei

234,858 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I’m used to reading lies about Kennedy Jr and then debunking them. Reading that Vanity Fair article was rough. I can’t support a man that committed sexual assault. So I spiraled this morning. Especially when people told me “that was 20 years ago.” Many women do not speak out at all, or it takes them years to do it. We also learned from Amber Heard that you can’t just believe all women. Kennedy refuses to comment on the situation which I think is the proper thing from a legal standpoint. If he admits it, he can face criminal charges. If he says the girl is lying, he can be sued for defamation like Trump was by E Jean Carroll - which is probably their goal. So for now, he is innocent until proven guilty. I’m not saying it happened and I’m not saying it didn’t happen. We don’t know. I can’t look at a chart to find the truth on this one. I do know one thing. Juries are given permission to throw out an entire witnesses testimony if they believe they lied about one thing. I do know there are lies in the Vanity article, numerous of them. Does that mean we should throw out the whole thing?
2:04

I’m used to reading lies about Kennedy Jr and then debunking them. Reading that Vanity Fair article was rough. I can’t support a man that committed sexual assault. So I spiraled this morning. Especially when people told me “that was 20 years ago.” Many women do not speak out at all, or it takes them years to do it. We also learned from Amber Heard that you can’t just believe all women. Kennedy refuses to comment on the situation which I think is the proper thing from a legal standpoint. If he admits it, he can face criminal charges. If he says the girl is lying, he can be sued for defamation like Trump was by E Jean Carroll - which is probably their goal. So for now, he is innocent until proven guilty. I’m not saying it happened and I’m not saying it didn’t happen. We don’t know. I can’t look at a chart to find the truth on this one. I do know one thing. Juries are given permission to throw out an entire witnesses testimony if they believe they lied about one thing. I do know there are lies in the Vanity article, numerous of them. Does that mean we should throw out the whole thing?

Anna Matson

201,127 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Watch Candace contradict herself from one month to the next. 👇👇👇 In January, Candace confirmed that a TPUSA donor who’s a “very good person” and was at the Aspen retreat said that Charlie did actually say he’d want Erika to take over in the event of something happening. Candace said the story “checked out” and that she had her answer. Now, she’s telling us that another donor has said actually no Charlie said nothing of the sort. Obviously two separate donors can say two separate things; it happens. The problem is that Candace is pretending she never said what she said in January. She seems to have forgotten all about this very good person donor from January who’s story checked out. She doesn’t seem at all concerned that this donor apparently lied to her, and she doesn’t explain to her audience—an audience she claims to be working with to “crowdsource” an “investigation”—why she believes one donor over the other. Both (or all) donors remain unnamed, so we can’t check for ourselves why we’re getting conflicting stories from them and from Candace. Another problem? Candace is now saying that Charlie saying this in Aspen never passed the sniff test for her—but if that’s the case, why did she hide that from us in January? Why didn’t she clue her audience into that? The audience she again claims to be working alongside? Why did she lead us to believe the story checked out if it “didn’t pass the sniff test”? Candace is making it up as she goes along. Her story shifts from month to month—not in the typical way for a fluid investigation but rather in ways wherein she all-out contradicts herself from one month to the next and never actually explains why. It’s as if previous months are simply forgotten by her—and she’s hoping you’ll forget too.
0:34

Watch Candace contradict herself from one month to the next. 👇👇👇 In January, Candace confirmed that a TPUSA donor who’s a “very good person” and was at the Aspen retreat said that Charlie did actually say he’d want Erika to take over in the event of something happening. Candace said the story “checked out” and that she had her answer. Now, she’s telling us that another donor has said actually no Charlie said nothing of the sort. Obviously two separate donors can say two separate things; it happens. The problem is that Candace is pretending she never said what she said in January. She seems to have forgotten all about this very good person donor from January who’s story checked out. She doesn’t seem at all concerned that this donor apparently lied to her, and she doesn’t explain to her audience—an audience she claims to be working with to “crowdsource” an “investigation”—why she believes one donor over the other. Both (or all) donors remain unnamed, so we can’t check for ourselves why we’re getting conflicting stories from them and from Candace. Another problem? Candace is now saying that Charlie saying this in Aspen never passed the sniff test for her—but if that’s the case, why did she hide that from us in January? Why didn’t she clue her audience into that? The audience she again claims to be working alongside? Why did she lead us to believe the story checked out if it “didn’t pass the sniff test”? Candace is making it up as she goes along. Her story shifts from month to month—not in the typical way for a fluid investigation but rather in ways wherein she all-out contradicts herself from one month to the next and never actually explains why. It’s as if previous months are simply forgotten by her—and she’s hoping you’ll forget too.

Natalie Jean Beisner

81,992 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten