Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Denmark is killing their cows Denmark mandated a new food additive called Bovaer. This additive inhibits an enzyme in cows’ digestive systems to reduce methane emissions from burps and flatulence Now these healthy cows are dying from the additive to “reduce greenhouse gases” “The cows are dying in Denmark...

WallStreetApes's profile picture

Wall Street Apes

1,223,852 subscribers

46,439 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаЗдоровье и велнесНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨"It's POISON for our cows..." Farmer Raises the Alarm on SICK Cows. What do they have in common? They are being fed Bovaer. Farmers in Denmark are mandated to feed the additive Bovaer to their cows, or face steep fines and/or prison. Bovaer is a food additive designed to reduce methane production in cows. The farmer said: "We started in the beginning of October with a low doses, and we raised it up till the full doses around the 20th of October, a little bit before. On the 30th of October, we really got problems. 🚨We have four groups of cows in our stable. We have one group with 36 sick cows, and in the end of the day, it started also in two other groups, and at that point, we really thought it's Bovaer. We heard already earlier some problems about other farmers, and the signals were really the same. 🚨On Friday morning, we had like 70 cows on our health list, and on Saturday morning, it was almost 90. We really don't want to feed it anymore. It's just poison for our cows.⤵️
1:58

🚨"It's POISON for our cows..." Farmer Raises the Alarm on SICK Cows. What do they have in common? They are being fed Bovaer. Farmers in Denmark are mandated to feed the additive Bovaer to their cows, or face steep fines and/or prison. Bovaer is a food additive designed to reduce methane production in cows. The farmer said: "We started in the beginning of October with a low doses, and we raised it up till the full doses around the 20th of October, a little bit before. On the 30th of October, we really got problems. 🚨We have four groups of cows in our stable. We have one group with 36 sick cows, and in the end of the day, it started also in two other groups, and at that point, we really thought it's Bovaer. We heard already earlier some problems about other farmers, and the signals were really the same. 🚨On Friday morning, we had like 70 cows on our health list, and on Saturday morning, it was almost 90. We really don't want to feed it anymore. It's just poison for our cows.⤵️

The HighWire

12,302 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

“Bovaer is food additive to allow Farmers to reduce Enteric Methane Emissions” “The reason we’re so excited about Bovaer is it’s not just some fairy dust” These people are legitimately insane as they sell their farms out to International Corporations - I guarantee these cows are first in line for Bill Gates Cattle Vaccines too.
0:37

“Bovaer is food additive to allow Farmers to reduce Enteric Methane Emissions” “The reason we’re so excited about Bovaer is it’s not just some fairy dust” These people are legitimately insane as they sell their farms out to International Corporations - I guarantee these cows are first in line for Bill Gates Cattle Vaccines too.

Concerned Citizen

76,325 просмотров • 1 год назад

We have just announced a new project with Morrisons, Tesco and Aldi Stores UK to trial the use of feed additive, Bovaer® on ~30 Arla farms. Bovaer® can reduce emissions from cows by 27%, and this represents an amazing chance to reduce emissions on farm. #agriculture #climate
1:06

We have just announced a new project with Morrisons, Tesco and Aldi Stores UK to trial the use of feed additive, Bovaer® on ~30 Arla farms. Bovaer® can reduce emissions from cows by 27%, and this represents an amazing chance to reduce emissions on farm. #agriculture #climate

Arla Foods UK

6,858,758 просмотров • 1 год назад

Scandinavian dairy multinational Arla Foods has terminated its trial of Bovaer, a controversial feed additive claimed to prevent global warming by reducing methane emissions from cattle. The move coincides with numerous reports from Danish farmers of severe adverse effects in their herds—including fever, collapses, and deaths—since the use of methane-reducing feed additives was made mandatory for large Danish dairy farms earlier this year.
2:44

Scandinavian dairy multinational Arla Foods has terminated its trial of Bovaer, a controversial feed additive claimed to prevent global warming by reducing methane emissions from cattle. The move coincides with numerous reports from Danish farmers of severe adverse effects in their herds—including fever, collapses, and deaths—since the use of methane-reducing feed additives was made mandatory for large Danish dairy farms earlier this year.

Wide Awake Media

160,165 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

In Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, governments are forcing farmers to add government-approved chemicals to cattle feed—all in the name of reducing cow emissions. The result? Sick cows. Dead livestock. And poisoned food. A Danish farmer using the chemical Bovaer watched as his cows fell ill—one even died. Now, imagine what this does to your milk, your cheese, your steak—the most nutrient-dense foods on Earth. This isn’t about climate. It’s about control. They’re coming for your food. Wake up before it’s too late.
1:07

In Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, governments are forcing farmers to add government-approved chemicals to cattle feed—all in the name of reducing cow emissions. The result? Sick cows. Dead livestock. And poisoned food. A Danish farmer using the chemical Bovaer watched as his cows fell ill—one even died. Now, imagine what this does to your milk, your cheese, your steak—the most nutrient-dense foods on Earth. This isn’t about climate. It’s about control. They’re coming for your food. Wake up before it’s too late.

Camus

236,763 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Arla Pauses Bovaer Trials After Consumer Backlash Big news in UK dairy: Arla has ended its trial of Bovaer, a feed additive designed to reduce methane emissions from cows. This follows strong public and farmer concerns about cow health and food safety, amplified by extensive community pressure. The trials involved 30 farms and the results are now under review. While Bovaer is approved by regulators and used in multiple countries, ongoing investigations in Denmark over reported health issues have raised caution. The primary focus remains on protecting animal welfare and food integrity. For full details, check the BBC article linked in the profile. Premium members gain exclusive access to updates, unique insights, and discounts on ethically raised produce—an opportunity to stay informed and advocate for safe, sustainable farming.
1:19

Arla Pauses Bovaer Trials After Consumer Backlash Big news in UK dairy: Arla has ended its trial of Bovaer, a feed additive designed to reduce methane emissions from cows. This follows strong public and farmer concerns about cow health and food safety, amplified by extensive community pressure. The trials involved 30 farms and the results are now under review. While Bovaer is approved by regulators and used in multiple countries, ongoing investigations in Denmark over reported health issues have raised caution. The primary focus remains on protecting animal welfare and food integrity. For full details, check the BBC article linked in the profile. Premium members gain exclusive access to updates, unique insights, and discounts on ethically raised produce—an opportunity to stay informed and advocate for safe, sustainable farming.

Camus

50,906 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Norwegian farmers are FORCED to feed their cows the chemical BOVAER — and the global elites are cashing in. This methane-inhibiting additive is partially owned by the Norwegian Oil Fund and their 2nd biggest shareholder? BlackRock, of course. Farmers complain they MUST wear protective gloves and masks just to mix it into the feed. Officials claim “it doesn’t enter the milk”… but there are no long-term studies on what it does to the cows — or to you drinking the milk and eating the dairy. This is being rammed through under the climate agenda while the same people who own Big Oil and asset management now profit from the “solution.” Your food supply is being chemically altered for profit and control. This isn’t coming — it’s already happening in Norway. Ask questions. Demand answers. The elites don’t drink the milk they’re forcing on everyone else.
1:38

Norwegian farmers are FORCED to feed their cows the chemical BOVAER — and the global elites are cashing in. This methane-inhibiting additive is partially owned by the Norwegian Oil Fund and their 2nd biggest shareholder? BlackRock, of course. Farmers complain they MUST wear protective gloves and masks just to mix it into the feed. Officials claim “it doesn’t enter the milk”… but there are no long-term studies on what it does to the cows — or to you drinking the milk and eating the dairy. This is being rammed through under the climate agenda while the same people who own Big Oil and asset management now profit from the “solution.” Your food supply is being chemically altered for profit and control. This isn’t coming — it’s already happening in Norway. Ask questions. Demand answers. The elites don’t drink the milk they’re forcing on everyone else.

Valerie Anne Smith

16,644 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

After seeing a town of people in South Africa in desperate need for assistance with food---and for becoming self-sustaining, 30 cows were graciously donated to them, along with instructions on how to raise the herd. They were told to use the cows for daily milk and cheese, along with breeding for future needs and for some income. After a few hours, all 30 cows were slaughtered and barbequed, the same day the livestock was gifted. When Mr. Steenhuisen returned and asked, where are the cows?, villagers replied, we know what you told us, but we wanted to eat them anyway.
0:29

After seeing a town of people in South Africa in desperate need for assistance with food---and for becoming self-sustaining, 30 cows were graciously donated to them, along with instructions on how to raise the herd. They were told to use the cows for daily milk and cheese, along with breeding for future needs and for some income. After a few hours, all 30 cows were slaughtered and barbequed, the same day the livestock was gifted. When Mr. Steenhuisen returned and asked, where are the cows?, villagers replied, we know what you told us, but we wanted to eat them anyway.

Dane

783,579 просмотров • 1 год назад

Bovaer: The Feed Additive Farmers and Consumers Are Rejecting—And Why It Should Concern Everyone The trial of Bovaer, a feed additive designed to reduce methane emissions in dairy cattle by up to 30%, is rolling out across the UK, backed by retail giants like Aldi, Tesco, and Arla. Marketed as a breakthrough for net-zero targets, the reality of Bovaer raises serious questions—about cost, safety, and who truly benefits. Developed by a Dutch-Swiss multinational, Bovaer is mixed into cattle feed to inhibit enzymes in the rumen, cutting methane production during digestion. While trials suggest short-term efficacy, the long-term consequences—for farmers, cows, and consumers—remain alarmingly unclear. The Cost Burden Industry estimates place the annual cost of Bovaer at £50–70 per cow. For a farm with 150 dairy cattle, that’s an extra £7,500–10,000 per year—a permanent expense for a fixed 30% reduction. Farmers won’t see higher milk prices to offset this. Consumers, however, will face rising costs at the supermarket. The only guaranteed winners? The corporations selling the additive and the retailers passing the buck. The Safety Gaps Bovaer’s raw form requires hazmat suits and full PPE for handlers—yet there’s no long-term data on its safety for farmers exposed to dust, nor on its effects when consumed through milk or dairy. The Soil Association hasn’t approved it for organic production. With no evidence of long-term health impacts, the rush to scale Bovaer feels reckless, echoing past disasters where “safe” industrial solutions later proved catastrophic. The Consumer Rebellion When corporations announced plans to adopt Bovaer, the public response was swift and unequivocal: rejection. Consumers don’t want untested additives in their food. They don’t want to be guinea pigs in a corporate experiment. And they’re making their voices heard—through boycotts, petitions, and a growing demand for transparency. The Bigger Picture Cows are part of a natural carbon cycle, not the equivalent of fossil fuel emissions. Yet Bovaer is being framed as an essential tool for climate goals—a narrative that ignores the real motive: profit. Farmers and consumers are left footing the bill for a “solution” that benefits only the companies selling it. The path forward is clear. Reject Bovaer. Support local farmers who refuse to use it. Demand food free from unproven additives. And keep speaking out—because when it comes to the food on our tables, the only acceptable standard is safety, not corporate convenience.
4:45

Bovaer: The Feed Additive Farmers and Consumers Are Rejecting—And Why It Should Concern Everyone The trial of Bovaer, a feed additive designed to reduce methane emissions in dairy cattle by up to 30%, is rolling out across the UK, backed by retail giants like Aldi, Tesco, and Arla. Marketed as a breakthrough for net-zero targets, the reality of Bovaer raises serious questions—about cost, safety, and who truly benefits. Developed by a Dutch-Swiss multinational, Bovaer is mixed into cattle feed to inhibit enzymes in the rumen, cutting methane production during digestion. While trials suggest short-term efficacy, the long-term consequences—for farmers, cows, and consumers—remain alarmingly unclear. The Cost Burden Industry estimates place the annual cost of Bovaer at £50–70 per cow. For a farm with 150 dairy cattle, that’s an extra £7,500–10,000 per year—a permanent expense for a fixed 30% reduction. Farmers won’t see higher milk prices to offset this. Consumers, however, will face rising costs at the supermarket. The only guaranteed winners? The corporations selling the additive and the retailers passing the buck. The Safety Gaps Bovaer’s raw form requires hazmat suits and full PPE for handlers—yet there’s no long-term data on its safety for farmers exposed to dust, nor on its effects when consumed through milk or dairy. The Soil Association hasn’t approved it for organic production. With no evidence of long-term health impacts, the rush to scale Bovaer feels reckless, echoing past disasters where “safe” industrial solutions later proved catastrophic. The Consumer Rebellion When corporations announced plans to adopt Bovaer, the public response was swift and unequivocal: rejection. Consumers don’t want untested additives in their food. They don’t want to be guinea pigs in a corporate experiment. And they’re making their voices heard—through boycotts, petitions, and a growing demand for transparency. The Bigger Picture Cows are part of a natural carbon cycle, not the equivalent of fossil fuel emissions. Yet Bovaer is being framed as an essential tool for climate goals—a narrative that ignores the real motive: profit. Farmers and consumers are left footing the bill for a “solution” that benefits only the companies selling it. The path forward is clear. Reject Bovaer. Support local farmers who refuse to use it. Demand food free from unproven additives. And keep speaking out—because when it comes to the food on our tables, the only acceptable standard is safety, not corporate convenience.

Camus

78,918 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

“I had a meeting with some influential Fulani people”. “For over 40 years, Fulani and Benue people have been un@live each other, this f!ght have gone further to cl@im the l!ves of millions of Nigerians, the problem is simply because the Fulani cows usually go into the farms and scatter the crops of the benue farmers likewise Jos in farmers retaliation goes after the cows, because the Fulani sees their cows ad family they go further to un@live humans as a rev€nge for their cows. It will also interest Nigerians to know that politicians have a large percentage of the cows you see on our roads and this is why they are not able to control these issues, I HAVE A SOLUTION TO THIS PROBLEM BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN IN TALKS WITH THE FULANI PEOPLE however I can't do it alone unless the government is ready to end this problem once and for all.” 🗣️—— VDM
12:08

“I had a meeting with some influential Fulani people”. “For over 40 years, Fulani and Benue people have been un@live each other, this f!ght have gone further to cl@im the l!ves of millions of Nigerians, the problem is simply because the Fulani cows usually go into the farms and scatter the crops of the benue farmers likewise Jos in farmers retaliation goes after the cows, because the Fulani sees their cows ad family they go further to un@live humans as a rev€nge for their cows. It will also interest Nigerians to know that politicians have a large percentage of the cows you see on our roads and this is why they are not able to control these issues, I HAVE A SOLUTION TO THIS PROBLEM BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN IN TALKS WITH THE FULANI PEOPLE however I can't do it alone unless the government is ready to end this problem once and for all.” 🗣️—— VDM

Larry🌚

55,021 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This truck is transporting dairy cows that farmers no longer want. Perhaps they are producing less milk or failing to calve. The average age of slaughter for a dairy cow in the U.K. is around 6 1/2 years. During this time she will have given birth ~4 times, and produced 32,000 litres of milk. They are used, and disposed of. They deserve the right to their own lives. #FebruDairy #Vegan #AnimalRights
0:40

This truck is transporting dairy cows that farmers no longer want. Perhaps they are producing less milk or failing to calve. The average age of slaughter for a dairy cow in the U.K. is around 6 1/2 years. During this time she will have given birth ~4 times, and produced 32,000 litres of milk. They are used, and disposed of. They deserve the right to their own lives. #FebruDairy #Vegan #AnimalRights

Veganella 🥦

14,171 просмотров • 2 лет назад

After spending the winter indoors, these cows finally get to run out into the pasture again. O Happy Cows! O Happy Cows! Finally liberated and out in the sun. Never seen cows frolicking happily in the green meadow. They weren't cows inside, they were waiting to be, but they forgot. Now they see the sky (and grass) and they remember what they are. - River Tam To clarify. In Denmark, the winter are typically rain, wind & snow. So a lot of cows would get sick being out in that changing weather. The pasture or field would be ruined if animals of these sizes (6-700 kilo) were to walk around around there, simply put, the field would be turned into a muddy swamp and would be ruined for the coming spring/summer. Plus, grass stops growing at 5 degrees, so there simply aren’t any nutrients in the grass.
1:02

After spending the winter indoors, these cows finally get to run out into the pasture again. O Happy Cows! O Happy Cows! Finally liberated and out in the sun. Never seen cows frolicking happily in the green meadow. They weren't cows inside, they were waiting to be, but they forgot. Now they see the sky (and grass) and they remember what they are. - River Tam To clarify. In Denmark, the winter are typically rain, wind & snow. So a lot of cows would get sick being out in that changing weather. The pasture or field would be ruined if animals of these sizes (6-700 kilo) were to walk around around there, simply put, the field would be turned into a muddy swamp and would be ruined for the coming spring/summer. Plus, grass stops growing at 5 degrees, so there simply aren’t any nutrients in the grass.

Imtiaz Mahmood

27,702 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

American feed manufacturers are now adding synthetic additives to chicken feed to change the yolk color This turns the color of the yolk orange and makes the eggs look like they have been grass fed on a farm “The industry uses something called xanthophyll, which is a feed additive. — That can make that yolk any color they want. So, whether the birds have lived out on green grass or they've never stepped foot outside, I can produce an or a yolk that's orange” “So then a lot of people are cracking this yolk open. They're like, oh, look at this beautiful orange yolk. And I'm like, that's not that's not orange because the birds are outside. That's from a a feed additive” Even when you try to be healthy in America, you can’t
0:50

American feed manufacturers are now adding synthetic additives to chicken feed to change the yolk color This turns the color of the yolk orange and makes the eggs look like they have been grass fed on a farm “The industry uses something called xanthophyll, which is a feed additive. — That can make that yolk any color they want. So, whether the birds have lived out on green grass or they've never stepped foot outside, I can produce an or a yolk that's orange” “So then a lot of people are cracking this yolk open. They're like, oh, look at this beautiful orange yolk. And I'm like, that's not that's not orange because the birds are outside. That's from a a feed additive” Even when you try to be healthy in America, you can’t

Wall Street Apes

819,947 просмотров • 1 год назад

BOVAER: PART 2.0 JUST THE TIP OF A VERY NASTY CHEMICAL ICEBERG: Supermarkets tell us milk is “fresh”, “simple”, “natural”. But they never tell us what the cows are actually fed. Behind the scenes: bakery waste, chemical preservatives, synthetic nitrogen (urea), ethanol by‑products, ionophores, mould‑binders… and now methane‑suppressing additives like Bovaer. None of this appears on the label. Families deserve transparency. If supermarkets can list every ingredient in a loaf of bread: Why can’t they list what’s fed to the cows that make our milk? What supermarkets don’t tell you about cattle feed: We imagine cows eating grass. Supermarkets encourage that image — rolling fields, sunshine, happy cows. But modern dairy feed is a complex mix of: • Bakery waste • Distillers grains • Urea (synthetic nitrogen fertiliser) • Ionophores • Chemical preservatives • Mycotoxin binders • Buffers • Enzymes • Bovaer None of this appears on milk labels. Not even in the “sourcing” pages on supermarket websites. Supermarkets know consumers care about additives. They label everything in human food… but zero transparency on animal feed. If feed additives are safe If they’re beneficial If they’re essential… Why hide them? Families deserve honesty. We shouldn’t need to dig through agricultural journals to know what’s entering the food chain. Transparency builds trust. Silence destroys it. 3. SUPERMARKET‑BY‑SUPERMARKET TRANSPARENCY BREAKDOWN: Tesco • Provides “grass‑fed” imagery • No disclosure of feed additives • No mention of Bovaer or ionophores • Organic range is the only one with feed transparency Sainsbury’s • Similar to Tesco • No feed ingredient lists • No disclosure of preservatives, binders, or rumen modifiers Asda • No feed transparency • No mention of additives • No sourcing detail beyond “British milk” Morrisons • Strong on “British farming” branding • Weak on feed transparency • No additive disclosure Waitrose • Better welfare standards • Still no full feed ingredient list • No disclosure of Bovaer or other rumen modifiers Aldi / Lidl • No feed transparency • No additive disclosure • No sourcing detail beyond “British” Co‑op • Ethical branding • Still no feed transparency • No additive disclosure Conclusion: Every major UK supermarket lists ingredients for human food. None list ingredients for the feed that produces milk, cheese, yoghurt, butter, or beef. This is the Transparency Gap. What’s missing... • Labels • Transparency • Consumer choice • Informed consent • Public awareness LACK OF INFORMATION = LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY
3:54

BOVAER: PART 2.0 JUST THE TIP OF A VERY NASTY CHEMICAL ICEBERG: Supermarkets tell us milk is “fresh”, “simple”, “natural”. But they never tell us what the cows are actually fed. Behind the scenes: bakery waste, chemical preservatives, synthetic nitrogen (urea), ethanol by‑products, ionophores, mould‑binders… and now methane‑suppressing additives like Bovaer. None of this appears on the label. Families deserve transparency. If supermarkets can list every ingredient in a loaf of bread: Why can’t they list what’s fed to the cows that make our milk? What supermarkets don’t tell you about cattle feed: We imagine cows eating grass. Supermarkets encourage that image — rolling fields, sunshine, happy cows. But modern dairy feed is a complex mix of: • Bakery waste • Distillers grains • Urea (synthetic nitrogen fertiliser) • Ionophores • Chemical preservatives • Mycotoxin binders • Buffers • Enzymes • Bovaer None of this appears on milk labels. Not even in the “sourcing” pages on supermarket websites. Supermarkets know consumers care about additives. They label everything in human food… but zero transparency on animal feed. If feed additives are safe If they’re beneficial If they’re essential… Why hide them? Families deserve honesty. We shouldn’t need to dig through agricultural journals to know what’s entering the food chain. Transparency builds trust. Silence destroys it. 3. SUPERMARKET‑BY‑SUPERMARKET TRANSPARENCY BREAKDOWN: Tesco • Provides “grass‑fed” imagery • No disclosure of feed additives • No mention of Bovaer or ionophores • Organic range is the only one with feed transparency Sainsbury’s • Similar to Tesco • No feed ingredient lists • No disclosure of preservatives, binders, or rumen modifiers Asda • No feed transparency • No mention of additives • No sourcing detail beyond “British milk” Morrisons • Strong on “British farming” branding • Weak on feed transparency • No additive disclosure Waitrose • Better welfare standards • Still no full feed ingredient list • No disclosure of Bovaer or other rumen modifiers Aldi / Lidl • No feed transparency • No additive disclosure • No sourcing detail beyond “British” Co‑op • Ethical branding • Still no feed transparency • No additive disclosure Conclusion: Every major UK supermarket lists ingredients for human food. None list ingredients for the feed that produces milk, cheese, yoghurt, butter, or beef. This is the Transparency Gap. What’s missing... • Labels • Transparency • Consumer choice • Informed consent • Public awareness LACK OF INFORMATION = LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY

Pete Sanford

21,591 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Farmer explains the story behind the demonization of raw milk: "They put a lot of dairies in cities next to distilleries. They would be fed the same grains from the distilleries, made these cows extremely unhealthy. These cows got tuberculosis... disease was rampant. The pasteurization process made this milk drinkable without killing you." He explains why the dairy industry is more responsible for milk related infections than raw dairy farms. "The chief fear from drinking raw milk is E. Coli... when the cows eat a lot of grain, their rumen becomes acidic. They have evolved to withstand the acid in their rumen, so now when we consume it, the acid in our stomach doesn't kill it" "The reason we're in this position with raw milk being demonized... mostly it's money. There's a lot of money in the dairy industry. They have sway with the media, with state and federal governments. It's a large industry with a powerful lobby."
2:03

Farmer explains the story behind the demonization of raw milk: "They put a lot of dairies in cities next to distilleries. They would be fed the same grains from the distilleries, made these cows extremely unhealthy. These cows got tuberculosis... disease was rampant. The pasteurization process made this milk drinkable without killing you." He explains why the dairy industry is more responsible for milk related infections than raw dairy farms. "The chief fear from drinking raw milk is E. Coli... when the cows eat a lot of grain, their rumen becomes acidic. They have evolved to withstand the acid in their rumen, so now when we consume it, the acid in our stomach doesn't kill it" "The reason we're in this position with raw milk being demonized... mostly it's money. There's a lot of money in the dairy industry. They have sway with the media, with state and federal governments. It's a large industry with a powerful lobby."

Dalton (Analyze & Optimize)

31,164 просмотров • 6 дней назад

If you want to know how bad the government wants to keep raw dairy from you, look no further than the Rawesome raid back in 2011. The FDA, FBI, and LAPD came in and took EVERYTHING from these business owners for selling real food, and then arrested the owners and put them in jail on $100k+ bail. They hate raw dairy for a couple reasons. 1. It cuts out a massive part of the food processing industry and lets people buy direct from farmers. Given the FDA is captured by these corporations, they went as far as possible to shut them down. Dairy corporations weren't getting their cut of the pie, so they used their clout and influence to treat these people like drug dealers for just selling real food. 2. Raw dairy would help heal everyone from the monstrous autoimmune epidemic happening across the country right now, and that is bad business for the medical system. They need people sick with screwed up guts and immune systems to keep needing their drugs, surgeries, and barbaric medical practices. There is mind blowing history to pasteurization that is rife with the same corruption, fraud, bad actors, and dogshit science for the benefit of corporations and business interests, similar to the vaccine industry, so I'll be doing a long post on that very soon. To put it simply, pasteurization did not make milk safer. Milk was making people sick due to heavy metal based pesticides being used in the early 1900s like paris green (lead, arsenic, etc), pesticides like DDT being sprayed on cows directly and on their food, as well as the distillery run offs they were feeding cows that were full of horrific toxins, which get into the milk and then people who drank it got sick. Everything you've been told by the government about raw dairy is a complete lie intended to restrict you from one the healthiest and most healing foods on earth, and keep money flowing to criminal food corporations trying to poison you.
5:17

If you want to know how bad the government wants to keep raw dairy from you, look no further than the Rawesome raid back in 2011. The FDA, FBI, and LAPD came in and took EVERYTHING from these business owners for selling real food, and then arrested the owners and put them in jail on $100k+ bail. They hate raw dairy for a couple reasons. 1. It cuts out a massive part of the food processing industry and lets people buy direct from farmers. Given the FDA is captured by these corporations, they went as far as possible to shut them down. Dairy corporations weren't getting their cut of the pie, so they used their clout and influence to treat these people like drug dealers for just selling real food. 2. Raw dairy would help heal everyone from the monstrous autoimmune epidemic happening across the country right now, and that is bad business for the medical system. They need people sick with screwed up guts and immune systems to keep needing their drugs, surgeries, and barbaric medical practices. There is mind blowing history to pasteurization that is rife with the same corruption, fraud, bad actors, and dogshit science for the benefit of corporations and business interests, similar to the vaccine industry, so I'll be doing a long post on that very soon. To put it simply, pasteurization did not make milk safer. Milk was making people sick due to heavy metal based pesticides being used in the early 1900s like paris green (lead, arsenic, etc), pesticides like DDT being sprayed on cows directly and on their food, as well as the distillery run offs they were feeding cows that were full of horrific toxins, which get into the milk and then people who drank it got sick. Everything you've been told by the government about raw dairy is a complete lie intended to restrict you from one the healthiest and most healing foods on earth, and keep money flowing to criminal food corporations trying to poison you.

Inversionism

807,577 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Ready To Have Your Mind Blown? “Did you know milk produced in the United States is banned in Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and all of the EU” “it's banned because of a growth hormone they give to the cows to make them produce more milk. It's called RBGH, and all of these countries have banned it because of how damaging it can be to our health.” “Europe banned this hormone over 20 years ago, but yet the regulatory authorities in the United States continue to approve it for use every year.” More information: The countries that have banned the use of recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) in food production are Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and Israel. These countries have implemented controls to track down growth hormone abuse in livestock, particularly in dairy cows, to ensure compliance with the ban. The effectiveness of these controls relies on appropriate analytical strategies to detect the presence of rBGH in milk and dairy products. Additionally, the European Union, including countries such as Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, and the Netherlands, has also banned the use of rBGH. These regulations are part of a broader effort to ensure food safety and address concerns about the potential health risks associated with the use of rBGH in dairy production.
0:27

Ready To Have Your Mind Blown? “Did you know milk produced in the United States is banned in Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and all of the EU” “it's banned because of a growth hormone they give to the cows to make them produce more milk. It's called RBGH, and all of these countries have banned it because of how damaging it can be to our health.” “Europe banned this hormone over 20 years ago, but yet the regulatory authorities in the United States continue to approve it for use every year.” More information: The countries that have banned the use of recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) in food production are Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and Israel. These countries have implemented controls to track down growth hormone abuse in livestock, particularly in dairy cows, to ensure compliance with the ban. The effectiveness of these controls relies on appropriate analytical strategies to detect the presence of rBGH in milk and dairy products. Additionally, the European Union, including countries such as Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, and the Netherlands, has also banned the use of rBGH. These regulations are part of a broader effort to ensure food safety and address concerns about the potential health risks associated with the use of rBGH in dairy production.

Wall Street Apes

1,147,737 просмотров • 2 лет назад

This Is BIG ‼️ “I'm not making it up. The University of Nebraska just got a got done with one of their studies that the way to save the world on carbon is raise more cows. K. And that's because cows are carbon negative” “They produce more oxygen than they put off methane and carbon. It means to eat more cheese burgers or steaks. Beef, to save the world.” “According to a 2023 University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) report, beef production can be climate-neutral or even better if management practices are optimized to minimize emissions and maximize abilities to store carbon. Some of the ways UNL research suggests that cattle’s carbon footprint can be reduced include: Diet: Cattle that eat more forage and added fats produce less methane and other greenhouse gases than those that eat more grain and less forage. Fat supplements can also reduce the need for grain. Production efficiency: Improving production efficiency can result in more cattle being marketed or more live weight being produced while using fewer resources. This can be achieved through breeding, feeding, and health programs. Supply chain: Buying feed that’s grown nearby can reduce shipping emissions.”
0:31

This Is BIG ‼️ “I'm not making it up. The University of Nebraska just got a got done with one of their studies that the way to save the world on carbon is raise more cows. K. And that's because cows are carbon negative” “They produce more oxygen than they put off methane and carbon. It means to eat more cheese burgers or steaks. Beef, to save the world.” “According to a 2023 University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) report, beef production can be climate-neutral or even better if management practices are optimized to minimize emissions and maximize abilities to store carbon. Some of the ways UNL research suggests that cattle’s carbon footprint can be reduced include: Diet: Cattle that eat more forage and added fats produce less methane and other greenhouse gases than those that eat more grain and less forage. Fat supplements can also reduce the need for grain. Production efficiency: Improving production efficiency can result in more cattle being marketed or more live weight being produced while using fewer resources. This can be achieved through breeding, feeding, and health programs. Supply chain: Buying feed that’s grown nearby can reduce shipping emissions.”

Wall Street Apes

2,658,216 просмотров • 2 лет назад