Density and Buoyancy vs. Gravity

Why don’t things fall up towards the less dense air then. Why do they fall down toward the more dense air? You know the answer!

Hmmm

Fine. Buoyancy. You win. So, what determines that sinking is a downward motion?

It took 2 seconds in to see “THEORY” capitalized to realize this is just retarded nonsense that only fucking morons would believe. Stupid beyond belief. Truth? Truth is, you’re retarded.

So please tell me why that something more dense is always facing the earth instead of the sky? Density and buoyancy only separate two objects… but why does one go up and the other go down… Wait for it… GRAVITY HOORAY 🙌🏽

Hey @truthache68 you dumbass. Density is ONLY the compactness of a substance and provides ZERO direction. Buoyancy REQUIRES an external downward force applied, which it DOES NOT and CANNOT provide! So tell me... what provides the observable downward directional force?

There has to be a directional vector. There is a constant downward electrical current of 10 micromicroamperes per meter of area from the positively charged sky to the negatively charged ground. Objects need a direction to fall.

Could it be the electrostatic pull between a positively charged sky and a negatively charged ground does spin up an electric field. This field could twerk anything with a charge or a bit of polarization, maybe even coaxing it to shift or align. You’d need directional vectors to map out the tug-of-war between the electric field, magnetic quirks, buoyancy—all those forces jockeying for control.

Scales ⚖️ prove gravity When there is no medium for an object to fall through, a force continues to pull to earth 🌍 mass X acceleration = weight 👍🌍👊