Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Despite prevailing narratives on marriage, we’re actually the least-divorced generation since the 1970s. (Even after you control for the decline in marriage.) Three reasons: 1) Marrying later. 2) Dating longer. 3) Marrying because you want to, not because it’s expected.

13,547 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Macken's profile picture
Macken1 year ago

Did I miss anything? Also, I’m not super confident extrapolating individual to population level on the “marrying later” and “dating longer” points because the data could, hypothetically, look like this… Maybe between individuals it’s inversely correlated, but not between time points.

Rebecca V Anti-Communist's profile picture
Rebecca V Anti-Communist1 year ago

Why is the narrative (from the right at least) ENTIRELY the opposite? They’re telling people to marry young and quickly, which is associated with higher divorce rate And we’re told that divorce rate is higher than it’s ever been. Why the lie? And why isn’t it debunked?

Pink Dragon Pill's profile picture
Pink Dragon Pill1 year ago

Some people have no patience letting society go through a transitional period As a Gen Xer, I'm basically a member of the sacrificed generation. But I see so many smart young women today that it makes it all OK We're gonna be all-right

Hijack Hypergamy's profile picture
Hijack Hypergamy1 year ago

A large majority of married males are unhappy, sexless and/or juiced and drained into a husk. They only stay because of finances / assets / kids.

پى كيو's profile picture
پى كيو1 year ago

Tell it to the American Taliban promoting marriage for girls 19/20 years old 🤦🏻‍♀️ Trapping girls straight out of their parents house to responsibilities of marriage and child raising w no time to themselves, no serious career, no serious education 😢

Raphaël's profile picture
Raphaël1 year ago

marriage's rate has been divided by three since the 1930, I doubt the data is comparable anymore

Pavel Chichikov's profile picture
Pavel Chichikov1 year ago

I mean call me crazy but after a brief look at the birth rates... maybe marrying sooner, dating shorter, and a few cases of marrying because its expected and not because you want to might be good for society.

High T Meta's profile picture
High T Meta1 year ago

Yet another miss. Its economic. Low income families make up the majority of divorce and now they cannot afford to The amount of kids being left in single parent homes is rising and you're out here talking about "because you want to" Plenty of people want to they cant afford it

Kane's profile picture
Kane1 year ago

@RationalMale that’s because no one getting married, marriage rates are at the lowest since records began to be recorded

Mousewrangler's profile picture
Mousewrangler1 year ago

Let's see the actual numbers. When you see a statement like this and there are no raw numbers to back it up, it usually means they're presenting a deceptive picture.

Related Videos

“Your generosity conceals something dirtier and meaner.” A wife saying this to her husband is a reminder to men to treat marriage as one of your least, and highest-risk, investments. An investment which, if it collapses, leaves you unshaken; and if it does not collapse, remains sustainable. And therefore, prioritize investments in self-sufficiency. Amass enough value and resources that only a portion of it when committed to marriage, suffices - while the remainder, if the marriage fails, insulates you from ruin. Most marriages fail partly because men are too little sufficient for the amount of stake they make. Men risk failing. And When men fail, marriages fail. And when marriage fails, the man fails the woman. Because a woman, I Will tell you, is often with the man because of the marriage, not in the marriage because of the man. For women, marriage is often the goal, not the man. The man is a means. And when marriage fails, that means has, in her eyes, proven useless. She rages. And with that, the man’s peace is alienated. You must not fail. Because your failure can become the marriage’s failure. For in your incapacity, the security marriage guaranteed your wife is threatened. And women’s attraction plummets where security diminishes. Then it matters less how much you have sacrificed, how much security you once guaranteed, your dreams, or even your potential to recover. What matters is the impending doom your failure appears to announce - the threat to her security. And with that, her survival. And as a naturally and spiritually dependent species, which woman is, you, the man, lose utility when you are no longer dependable. And consequently, lose respect, grace and companion. The whole point I am belabouring is this: Men, do not delude yourselves with the “for better or worse” myth and invest excessively in marriage. Invest in it with only a minimal percentage of your value, as you would any other high-risk investment. Be so self-sufficient before marriage that you can run your home on a harmless and mildly percentage of your finances. Marry a woman who poses less threat to your finances, peace, and emotional stability. Make marriage one of the smallest running investments in your portfolio. Because when you invest too much of yourself in marriage, you relinquish more profitable parts of your existence for something as low-profit and uncertain as marriage. Again and for the last time, Invest little enough in marriage that its collapse cannot collapse you. For a man who places too much of himself in marriage does builds a vulnerability not a union.

Mr Sergio

13,014 views • 3 months ago