“Despite the Palace’s attempt at a very, very elegant knock-back, the question is: was it said or was it not said? And my feeling is yes, I think it probably was said.” - Andy Webb

Yes … the Palace aren’t outright denying it was said. Earl Spencer is a meticulous record keeper and taped conversations. A close friend has corroborated the story … saying Spencer told him less than a year after Diana’s death. KC3 is a spiteful bitter petty individual!

You can be assured that this book was dissected by the lawyers at the publishers before the contents were allowed to be published, so as you say it is true.

If it weren't true they'd already be threatening to sue.

The palace wanted Diana to be forgotten before the ink on the divorce papers was even dry. They used the press to smear and vilify her. That period was famously known as the 'The War of the Waleses.' I can totally believe Charles would have used those words to Diana's brother.

@Alt52017689 We know it was said, Charles Spencer acknowledged it in his Eulogy to Diana.

Absolutely rings true, in my opinion.

@mariagrant68 These people are evil covered up in shining things

They're good at denying and not stating what exactly they're denying. 2003 article where Charles did the same thing.

Diana’s brother is telling the truth and the monarchy can’t take it. #SwanSong I have more respect for Earl Spencer than I have ever had for Charles. Period

That's exactly what we all think including those trying to deny it.

The banner is false. The palace did not deny the claim, but they knew the British press would do so on their behalf.

This guy is right, i believe it as well, as this guy has said notes will be around !

It might have been said it might not but would Princess Diana want her brother dragging it all up again and her children having to go through it again? I am 100% sure not. Earl Spencer is a hypocrite and an opportunist

Same