正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Develop strong analytical and problem-solving capabilities while gaining the skills to pursue global career opportunities in: 💰 Tax Accounting 🔍 Forensic Accounting 📊 Financial Accounting 📈 Management Accounting 🖥️ Computational Accounting Admissions are ongoing. Apply Now!

2,280,980 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

We have observed that a portion of the timeline regarding the CBX vs. SM dispute has been misinterpreted, leading to speculation and confusion, particularly concerning the issue of pooled accounting. To clarify, during the emergency press conference held on June 10, CBX’s legal representative did indeed address the matter of accounting records [video attached] The lawyer stated: “Thinking that this would clearly become a legal issue, I requested settlement data from my clients. In particular, Article 14 of the Popular Culture and Arts Industry Development Act mandates that accounting books regarding popular culture planning and compensation must be maintained separately. I even had doubts as to whether SM was conducting proper accounting. While SM claimed they could not disclose the accounting books because information regarding other artists might be mixed in, such records should not have been prepared in a way that mixes information with other artists in the first place.” This statement does not suggest that income from all activities was combined and redistributed among others/group/elsewhere. Rather, it indicates that the accounting records were not properly separated per artist, as required by law. In other words, the issue raised concerns improper organization and lack of separation in bookkeeping, where other artists’ financial data appear to have been maintained within the same records. This creates significant difficulty in clearly identifying individual earnings and verifying whether settlements have been calculated accurately and fairly. Furthermore, this lack of separation was reportedly used as a justification by SM Entertainment to deny access to detailed settlement data, citing the risk of exposing other artists’ information. Given this context, it is important to refrain from making assumptions that extend beyond what was explicitly stated. The concern raised was about transparency, compliance with legal standards, and the ability to verify financial accuracy—shared or redistributed income has not been addressed.

best of 백현이 ❤️

278,999 次观看 • 4 个月前

There are two non-negotiables in accounting: the books must be correct, and they must be ready on time. For decades, companies have satisfied those constraints through an extraordinary amount of manual effort. Highly trained professionals code transactions, re-approve familiar expenses, reconcile mismatches after the fact, and compress all of it into the ritual of month-end close. It works. But it is fundamentally retrospective. Today, Ramp is introducing an Accounting Agent designed around a different premise: what if bookkeeping happened as the business operated, rather than after it? The agent captures, codes, reviews, validates, accrues, and reconciles spend continuously. It learns directly from the people who understand the nuances best, the accounting team itself, and applies that context in real time. At Perplexity, where velocity is part of the company’s identity, this has allowed their team to stop choosing between speed and accuracy. The majority of transactions are now coded automatically while remaining audit-ready, enabling close to start on day one instead of day thirty. What’s been most striking is how the system learns the subtle, company-specific logic that historically lived only in human judgment. As Jim Romano, CFO at Stateside Vodka, described it, the agent is already identifying patterns like when spend belongs in samples rather than travel and entertainment — the kinds of decisions that typically require institutional memory. As he put it, the goal is simple: finance teams should focus on exceptions, not the easy stuff. We’re also seeing the second-order effects emerge quickly. Teams report spending dramatically less time reviewing transactions and substantially more time on planning, analysis, and growth. As one CFO told us, “What used to take hours of manual review now happens automatically. I’m spending nearly all of my time thinking about where the business should go, not retracing where it’s already been.” There is a broader shift underway in accounting. The central question is moving from “what parts of close can be automated?” to “should close even be a discrete event at all?” One belief that increasingly guides our work at Ramp is that information latency inside companies is an invisible tax. When financial truth lags behind operational reality, organizations make slower and often worse decisions. As transaction data becomes inherently digital and systems become capable of learning institutional context, continuous close stops being aspirational and starts becoming inevitable. One thing that surprised us while building this: accounting isn’t constrained by a lack of rules — it’s constrained by how many of those rules are unwritten. Much of financial operations lives in patterns that experienced teams simply know. Seeing software begin to absorb and apply that tacit knowledge has been one of the clearest signals that accounting is entering a new phase. Accounting has always been the record for business reality. Our goal is to help it become something closer to real-time truth. Proud of the team, and grateful to the customers building this alongside us.

Eric Glyman

130,538 次观看 • 5 个月前