Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

DEVELOPING: AfriForum's Kallie Kriel describes the recent sanctions imposed by US President Donald Trump as a real crisis. Kriel emphasised their loyalty and commitment to the country. He further says, "We will not survive as a cultural community anywhere else in the world."

263,585 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

11 Yorum

tkay_omuhle profil fotoğrafı
tkay_omuhle1 yıl önce

Why is it east for them to survive here. These people must leave South Africa. We are tired of these racist, since 1990 we have had to deal with their shit. If they thought trying to bully South Africans was gonna work, they are wrong. The English man are better because they don't try to grabe everything for themselves. These rotten "category of people " have took land yet want more and more. They must go be refugees

Prof Thuli Madonsela #KindnessBuilds profil fotoğrafı
Prof Thuli Madonsela #KindnessBuilds1 yıl önce

No Afriforum. You should hold yourselves liable for peddling lies about our laws and cosying up with someone whose conflict of interest is driving the policy decisions he is making the US adopt concerning South Africa. Do not pass the buck. Own the consequences of your actions.

Rock Paper Sizzle profil fotoğrafı
Rock Paper Sizzle1 yıl önce

💪 Merica, we're taking it back. 💯 You like Trump, you know it, time to show it. ✅ T's for Trump here:

Vusanizwe profil fotoğrafı
Vusanizwe1 yıl önce

Fucked around and now finding out.

The Zulu profil fotoğrafı
The Zulu1 yıl önce

South Africa should charge this man with treason @DOJCD_ZA @PresidencyZA @GovernmentZA

Noedine Isaacs-Mpulo profil fotoğrafı
Noedine Isaacs-Mpulo1 yıl önce

They could also seek asylum in the Netherlands & France from whence they were exiled. They maybe could still find cultural expression there. Plus they won't be subject to genocide as they claim to be here.

Victor profil fotoğrafı
Victor1 yıl önce

He's a fucken idiot with his followers

Luzuko Gedze profil fotoğrafı
Luzuko Gedze1 yıl önce

Loyal to what ??? Mnxim. Kriel must just fokof. No time for fancy big words now. These things helped peddle lies about South Africa. They must just go! Futsek.

Vela Mdletshe profil fotoğrafı
Vela Mdletshe1 yıl önce

Can they pls leave us in peace bakithi!!

Check Your Facts profil fotoğrafı
Check Your Facts1 yıl önce

This is the single most detrimental event in the future of Afrikaners in SA. The fact that a foreign western country singled them out as their own keen will alienate them from SA. The single most compelling argument Afrikaners put forward was their Africaness. Clearly not anymore

𝑺𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒍𝒆 𝑴𝒔𝒊𝒃𝒊 Ⓜ profil fotoğrafı
𝑺𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒍𝒆 𝑴𝒔𝒊𝒃𝒊 Ⓜ1 yıl önce

What i have learned about politics: Is that it is all about the meetings we are not invited to. The public announcements are about controlling the masses & tickling their ears. Those who leave : we wish them LUCK. But those who will remain are the real South Africans. And we should sit down, talk & resolve these easy issues. 1st a land Audit that we all agree on. As things stand now everyone is operating on their own Data. We have always approached this from an aggressive angle & there was no need.

Benzer Videolar

Kallie Kriel: The Man Who Lost the Referendum and Has Been Fighting Democracy Ever Since Kallie Kriel presents himself abroad as a defender of minorities and freedom. At home, his record tells a very different story: a man who has spent more than three decades opposing South Africa’s democratic project and when he lost, took his grievances overseas. 1. He Opposed Democracy When It Mattered Most In 1992, South Africans were asked a simple question: end apartheid or preserve it. Kallie Kriel was on the wrong side of history. He campaigned against the referendum that paved the way for democracy. He opposed giving Black South Africans political voice. He lost decisively and South Africa chose reconciliation over racial supremacy. That defeat defines everything that followed. This is not speculation. It is historical record. 2. From Political Loser to International Alarmist Unable to win arguments inside South Africa, Kriel changed strategy: export the grievance. Since at least the late 2010s, he has toured foreign capitals particularly the United States selling a narrative that South Africa is collapsing, persecuting minorities, and committing “genocide”. These claims have been: Rejected by South African courts Dismissed by EU officials Publicly contradicted by diplomats Dismissed by the UNO Mocked by fact-checkers and foreign commentators Yet he persists because the goal is no longer truth. The goal is delegitimisation. 3. The “Genocide” Claim: Recycled, Debunked, Repeated Kriel’s genocide narrative has been: •Investigated •Statistically disproven •Rejected by international observers And still he repeats it especially on right-wing U.S. media platforms that profit from outrage, not accuracy. If South Africa were committing genocide, no serious multilateral body would be silent. Instead, what we see is: Nordic ambassadors learning local languages and engaging communities ( they always send us the best) Germany’s ambassador actively promoting South Africa’s culture and economic potential Australia and New Zealand openly stating that racial grievance politics is unwelcome The world is not buying what Kriel is selling. 4. Conspiracy as a Political Weapon When facts fail, Kriel turns to insinuation. He has publicly claimed that unnamed journalists are being paid by “state security” to discredit him yet: •He produced no evidence •He named no individuals •He refused to substantiate the claim when challenged That is not whistleblowing. That is character assassination by rumour. Ironically, the only person discredited by these claims is Kallie Kriel himself 5. The White South Africans He Claims to Represent Don’t Want Him Here is an inconvenient truth Kriel avoids: Most white South Africans do not support him. They live here. They build businesses. They raise families. They participate in democracy. They do not need a professional grievance merchant telling the world their country is a failed state. They understand that criticism is patriotic but sabotage is not.we not saying we a perfect country, every country in the world has issues. 6. A Simple Question He Never Answers If South Africa is irredeemable… If democracy here is illegitimate… If the Constitution offers no protection… Why does he stay? South Africa allows dissent. South Africa allows criticism. South Africa even allows Kallie Kriel to say what he says. What it does not allow and what the world increasingly sees through is bad-faith activism dressed up as human rights. Final Truth Kallie Kriel is not a defender of democracy. He is a man who lost a referendum in 1992 and has never accepted the outcome. History moved on. South Africa moved on. The world moved on. Only Kallie Kriel remains stuck in a past that no longer exists. Apartheid was ended with a 68.2 saying yes end apartheid. Cape Town and Durban had 85% end apartheid. This was the death knell for Kallie Kriel.

Goolam

26,609 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce