正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Did Elon Musk confirm that we never actually landed on the moon? Bart Sibrel breaks down his cryptic statements about moon missions:

177,683 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Chris Knight 的头像
Chris Knight1 年前

Different designs. Saturn V launch cost (today's money) 1.4 billion and carried all the fuel it needed in 3 disposable phases. Starship is around 20 million and reusable and would need 6 launches. 120 million vs 1.4 billion - it's a genius design. Nasa in 1960 used brute force and lots of tax payers money and wasn't sustainable, but it beat Russia, pretty much it's only goal. The idea we didn't go is so stupid.

HUDI 的头像
HUDI2 年前

Are corporations spying on you? 🛡️ Shield your data with DataMask🐸 DataMask is the first web3 data wallet companion ⚔️ that lets you store, protect and monetize your data. Give it a try now! 🦾 (credit: this video comes from our community art! 😍)

Foghorn702 的头像
Foghorn7021 年前

If we didn’t actually land on the moon the Soviet Union would have let the world know. There’s no way in this world that the Soviet Union at that time would have let a fake moon landing slide. That is the ONLY piece of evidence I need to confirm the moon landings as fake. The other important piece of evidence is the number of people that would have to keep such an endeavor a secret is simply implausible. That many people would never be able to keep such an undertaking secret.

McJingleheimer 的头像
McJingleheimer1 年前

@elonmusk This grifting cherry picker is the epitome of dense; Dunning-Kruger's final boss. Buzz Aldrin should've punched him harder.

jerimiahwasabullfrog🇺🇸 的头像
jerimiahwasabullfrog🇺🇸1 年前

@elonmusk This is bullshit. I saw the movie. All you need is a moderately bright black woman and a 57’ and a half Chevey.

filthpig 的头像
filthpig1 年前

@elonmusk It’s because each launch would only carry a small amount of fuel to ref fuel a ship, waiting in orbit to go to the moon. You guys have so little knowledge about the subject, it’s shocking

Tesla Hype 的头像
Tesla Hype1 年前

lol You are comparing an expendable rocket architecture to a fully reusable one, with very different mission objectives. Starship needs about 8 LEO refilling events to go to the moon and back (back meaning, ~zero out G forces, come back to precisely land on the launch tower). There are also different mission objectives compared to Saturn V era missions. Your "analysis" is deeply flawed.

ShockedAtWhat 的头像
ShockedAtWhat1 年前

@elonmusk Everything I ever learned in school, was a LIE. JFK ASSASSINATION AND NOW THE MOON.

DK 的头像
DK1 年前

Because he’s not destroying the ship after lunch and having it land in the ocean, he’s taking the entire ship not just a capsule to the moon. He’s landing the entire ship on the moon and then returning the entire ship and landing the entire ship so that we can do it all over again. Eight loads of fuel is exponentially cheaper in order of magnitudes less than rebuilding a new rocket. Every time you wanted to go.

Matt Manna 的头像
Matt Manna1 年前

@elonmusk I’m always open to seeing more data, but a quick chatgpt search gives good counters to his points. For example, elon saying starship needs 8 refueling missions can be explained by the fact that Starship has a significantly higher payload, and is reusable, needing fuel to land.

Leeroy Jay Jenkins 的头像
Leeroy Jay Jenkins1 年前

@elonmusk If it’s going to take 8 fuel ups to get only to the moon then Mars is going to take how many?🤔it’s never going to happen because they’ve sold you a lie.

相关视频