Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Did Ro Khanna make any effort to determine if the "powerful men" whose names he read out today are guilty of child-sex crimes? Because that's the strong impression he's giving to the uninformed viewer: that these men implicated in grave pedo criminality. So: where's the evidence?

Michael Tracey

347,226 subscribers

29,126 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

U.S. Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie urged the DOJ to unredact names of powerful men in the Epstein files, saying transparency is needed to investigate alleged crimes

U.S. Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie urged the DOJ to unredact names of powerful men in the Epstein files, saying transparency is needed to investigate alleged crimes

Reuters

32,738 views • 6 months ago

Ro Khanna read the names of six people on the House floor and described them as "wealthy, powerful men" involved in Epstein's crimes. It turns out that 4 of them were just random people selected for an FBI photo lineup and had no connection to Epstein's crimes.

Ro Khanna read the names of six people on the House floor and described them as "wealthy, powerful men" involved in Epstein's crimes. It turns out that 4 of them were just random people selected for an FBI photo lineup and had no connection to Epstein's crimes.

Greg Price

955,568 views • 5 months ago

JUST IN: The names of at least 6 men were redacted in the Epstein files, according to Reps Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna. Massie said with a smile that one of the men is "pretty high up" in a foreign government. "They need to do a little more homework. There are six men. We went in there for two hours. There are millions of files." "And in a couple of hours, we found six men whose names have been redacted, who are implicated in the way that the files are presented."

JUST IN: The names of at least 6 men were redacted in the Epstein files, according to Reps Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna. Massie said with a smile that one of the men is "pretty high up" in a foreign government. "They need to do a little more homework. There are six men. We went in there for two hours. There are millions of files." "And in a couple of hours, we found six men whose names have been redacted, who are implicated in the way that the files are presented."

Collin Rugg

1,433,879 views • 6 months ago

🇺🇸 REP. RO KHANNA ON EPSTEIN FILES: "RELEASE THE NAMES!" "The survivors want a transparent release. If there's no coverup this release should have the 302 statements and prosecution memos to show who these rich and powerful men were." Source: Ro Khanna

🇺🇸 REP. RO KHANNA ON EPSTEIN FILES: "RELEASE THE NAMES!" "The survivors want a transparent release. If there's no coverup this release should have the 302 statements and prosecution memos to show who these rich and powerful men were." Source: Ro Khanna

Mario Nawfal

83,123 views • 6 months ago

Massie first said he was going to read the names of pedo-traffickers on the House floor, based on a list given to him by "survivors." Now he says it's not the responsibility of "survivors" to give these names. So he'll just vaguely accuse unknown men of committing unknown crimes

Massie first said he was going to read the names of pedo-traffickers on the House floor, based on a list given to him by "survivors." Now he says it's not the responsibility of "survivors" to give these names. So he'll just vaguely accuse unknown men of committing unknown crimes

Michael Tracey

523,928 views • 8 months ago

In February, Rep. Ro Khanna stood on the House floor and read six names the DOJ had redacted from the Epstein files. "There were six wealthy, powerful men that the DOJ hid for no apparent reason." He read them into the record. Nobody has been charged.

In February, Rep. Ro Khanna stood on the House floor and read six names the DOJ had redacted from the Epstein files. "There were six wealthy, powerful men that the DOJ hid for no apparent reason." He read them into the record. Nobody has been charged.

Epstein File Search

12,695 views • 2 months ago

Q: "Who are the six men whose names you saw [redacted in the Epstein Files]?" Rep. Ro Khanna: "We are going to push DOJ to release those. They had photographs, as marked, of co-conspirators…and there's no reason that they should be covering up those names."

Q: "Who are the six men whose names you saw [redacted in the Epstein Files]?" Rep. Ro Khanna: "We are going to push DOJ to release those. They had photographs, as marked, of co-conspirators…and there's no reason that they should be covering up those names."

Home of the Brave

224,287 views • 6 months ago

Rep. Ro Khanna went to the House floor Tuesday to read the names of six "wealthy, powerful men" whose identities were shielded in the public release of the Epstein files. "The British government may fall. The Norwegian princess may not become queen. Other countries are having total investigations of anyone who even shared emails with Epstein," he tells Geoff Bennett. "In our nation, we have not had accountability, and so it was a symbolic act. It was an act of courage and defiance to start naming names."

Rep. Ro Khanna went to the House floor Tuesday to read the names of six "wealthy, powerful men" whose identities were shielded in the public release of the Epstein files. "The British government may fall. The Norwegian princess may not become queen. Other countries are having total investigations of anyone who even shared emails with Epstein," he tells Geoff Bennett. "In our nation, we have not had accountability, and so it was a symbolic act. It was an act of courage and defiance to start naming names."

PBS News

60,917 views • 6 months ago

After their bill had passed and millions of Epstein files were released, Massie and Khanna spent some time reviewing the files and then went straight to a press conference. They were in a massive hurry to declare that they "caught" the DOJ. They spent the majority of the press conference boasting about the "coverup" that they had discovered. Massie and Khanna said they found six men who were being protected in the files. They didn't take a couple days to sort it out and make sure that they were correct. Instead, they immediately held a press conference. Khanna praised Massie for using his "MIT logic" to find the "coverups." Massie was asked at the press conference how he knew that the men were guilty of crimes. Listen to his answer. It's gibberish. He said he found a list of 20 names and photos (including Epstein), saw some foreign names and figured out by the corresponding photos that they were men and therefore concluded they had to be guilty. The very next day Ro Khanna read these names on the House floor and then they both went on TV to talk about these six people. He and Massie ended up defaming innocent people. A politician found some redactions and photos, immediately held a press conference without knowing anything else about the what he had found, and then falsely accused innocent men. That's the least "libertarian" thing ever. It's exactly the type of thing that most libertarians would be outraged about but because it was Massie, they don't care.

After their bill had passed and millions of Epstein files were released, Massie and Khanna spent some time reviewing the files and then went straight to a press conference. They were in a massive hurry to declare that they "caught" the DOJ. They spent the majority of the press conference boasting about the "coverup" that they had discovered. Massie and Khanna said they found six men who were being protected in the files. They didn't take a couple days to sort it out and make sure that they were correct. Instead, they immediately held a press conference. Khanna praised Massie for using his "MIT logic" to find the "coverups." Massie was asked at the press conference how he knew that the men were guilty of crimes. Listen to his answer. It's gibberish. He said he found a list of 20 names and photos (including Epstein), saw some foreign names and figured out by the corresponding photos that they were men and therefore concluded they had to be guilty. The very next day Ro Khanna read these names on the House floor and then they both went on TV to talk about these six people. He and Massie ended up defaming innocent people. A politician found some redactions and photos, immediately held a press conference without knowing anything else about the what he had found, and then falsely accused innocent men. That's the least "libertarian" thing ever. It's exactly the type of thing that most libertarians would be outraged about but because it was Massie, they don't care.

MAZE

532,366 views • 2 months ago

In Just 2 Hours, Congressmen Massie and Khana Found SIX Offenders in the Unredacted Epstein Files Congressman Thomas Massie: "There's millions of files, right? And in a couple of hours, we found six men, whose names have been redacted, who are implicated in the way that the files were presented. Thank you, Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna, for fighting for justice for these victims.

In Just 2 Hours, Congressmen Massie and Khana Found SIX Offenders in the Unredacted Epstein Files Congressman Thomas Massie: "There's millions of files, right? And in a couple of hours, we found six men, whose names have been redacted, who are implicated in the way that the files were presented. Thank you, Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna, for fighting for justice for these victims.

Ryan Rozbiani

27,735 views • 6 months ago

BREAKING: Rep. Thomas Massie says that he viewed 6 names in the un-redacted Epstein files that the DOJ erroneously and illegally hid. "In a couple of hours, we found six men whose names have been redacted, who are implicated in the way that the files are presented."

BREAKING: Rep. Thomas Massie says that he viewed 6 names in the un-redacted Epstein files that the DOJ erroneously and illegally hid. "In a couple of hours, we found six men whose names have been redacted, who are implicated in the way that the files are presented."

E X X ➠A L E R T S

585,895 views • 6 months ago

MASSIVE BREAKING: Ro Khanna just unveiled the names of 6 powerful men who were redacted in the Epstein Files! Why did the Trump DOJ cover for them? Here they are: Salvatore Nuara Zurab Mikeladze Leonic Leonov Nicola Caputo Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem Leslie Wexner We need answers immediately as to why these men were redacted and what Pam Bondi is covering up.

MASSIVE BREAKING: Ro Khanna just unveiled the names of 6 powerful men who were redacted in the Epstein Files! Why did the Trump DOJ cover for them? Here they are: Salvatore Nuara Zurab Mikeladze Leonic Leonov Nicola Caputo Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem Leslie Wexner We need answers immediately as to why these men were redacted and what Pam Bondi is covering up.

Brian Krassenstein

1,415,555 views • 6 months ago

BREAKING: RO KHANNA JUST UNVEILED THE NAMES OF 6 POWERFUL MEN WHO WERE REDACTED IN THE EPSTEIN FILES Here they are: • Salvatore Nuara • Zurab Mikeladze • Leonic Leonov • Nicola Caputo • Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem • Leslie Wexner Why did the Trump DOJ cover for them?

BREAKING: RO KHANNA JUST UNVEILED THE NAMES OF 6 POWERFUL MEN WHO WERE REDACTED IN THE EPSTEIN FILES Here they are: • Salvatore Nuara • Zurab Mikeladze • Leonic Leonov • Nicola Caputo • Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem • Leslie Wexner Why did the Trump DOJ cover for them?

Sulaiman Ahmed

1,667,930 views • 6 months ago

Ro Khanna: [Elon Musk] had the opportunity to come before the Oversight Committee, comply with the subpoena, and explain what he was doing. He never did that. He had the opportunity to show that he was acting in a constitutional way. He never did that. He's basically threatening any member of Congress who's willing to ask a question.

Ro Khanna: [Elon Musk] had the opportunity to come before the Oversight Committee, comply with the subpoena, and explain what he was doing. He never did that. He had the opportunity to show that he was acting in a constitutional way. He never did that. He's basically threatening any member of Congress who's willing to ask a question.

Blue Georgia

37,399 views • 1 month ago

John Mearsheimer thinks the Epstein Files contain conclusive evidence that elite men were engaged in rampant pedophilia, and "effectively raping underage girls." He doesn't cite any specific evidence, because there is none, but that's irrelevant for the mythos he's spinning out

John Mearsheimer thinks the Epstein Files contain conclusive evidence that elite men were engaged in rampant pedophilia, and "effectively raping underage girls." He doesn't cite any specific evidence, because there is none, but that's irrelevant for the mythos he's spinning out

Michael Tracey

53,056 views • 4 months ago

Five months ago Thomas Massie said the following: ▪️There are associates of Epstein who are guilty of raping children who have never been investigated before. ▪️When the Epstein files are released, men guilty of raping children will go to prison. ▪️The FBI is currently covering up at least 20 cases of child rape related to the Epstein case. ▪️There were 1,000 Epstein victims and the FBI will not be able to cover up all the cases. ▪️If the names of the guilty men aren't released, he or a Democrat would read them on the floor of the house. Where are these 1,000 victims? Who are all these guilty men? Doesn't the public deserve to know? Asking these questions will get you called a "protector of pedophiles." Massie will most likely block you. Trust me, I know. Ro Khanna has repeated the same lines as Massie nightly on TV for about six months. Recently he was on the BBC talking about there is a cabal of men who are guilty of raping children that the FBI is protecting. Either Massie and Khanna have seen proof to back up their claims, or they have not. If they have seen proof, they are currently protecting child rapists by not disclosing what they know. If they haven't seen proof of what they have been claiming on TV for six months and it was just all assumptions, then it's one of the most despicable grifts of all time.

Five months ago Thomas Massie said the following: ▪️There are associates of Epstein who are guilty of raping children who have never been investigated before. ▪️When the Epstein files are released, men guilty of raping children will go to prison. ▪️The FBI is currently covering up at least 20 cases of child rape related to the Epstein case. ▪️There were 1,000 Epstein victims and the FBI will not be able to cover up all the cases. ▪️If the names of the guilty men aren't released, he or a Democrat would read them on the floor of the house. Where are these 1,000 victims? Who are all these guilty men? Doesn't the public deserve to know? Asking these questions will get you called a "protector of pedophiles." Massie will most likely block you. Trust me, I know. Ro Khanna has repeated the same lines as Massie nightly on TV for about six months. Recently he was on the BBC talking about there is a cabal of men who are guilty of raping children that the FBI is protecting. Either Massie and Khanna have seen proof to back up their claims, or they have not. If they have seen proof, they are currently protecting child rapists by not disclosing what they know. If they haven't seen proof of what they have been claiming on TV for six months and it was just all assumptions, then it's one of the most despicable grifts of all time.

MAZE

117,775 views • 4 months ago

🚨🇺🇸 KHANNA: FILE REDACTIONS ARE PROTECTING “POWERFUL MEN” Rep. Ro Khanna says files released under a law he and Thomas Massie pushed reference “10 co-conspirators,” but key names remain blacked out. According to Khanna, the redactions aren’t about caution, they’re about shielding powerful men accused of abusing working-class girls or helping cover it up. Why this matters: transparency laws are supposed to expose wrongdoing, not sanitize it, and redactions like this fuel public distrust. The documents are out, but accountability is still missing… and that’s the part people are noticing. Rep. Khanna: “This is not that complicated… just release the FBI files where the survivors were interviewed. Some of the names are famous names, a lot of them are financial people in powerful positions… not all of them abused underaged girls, but some of them were at parties where there were 13 year old's paraded naked. Some of them had girls trafficked to them, and some of them actually did abuse underaged girls Release those files! They’re hiding it. If they were honest, they’re hiding it because they’re protecting people… affiliates of Trump. This Epstein class needs to be held accountable.” Source: Ro Khanna, Thomas Massie

🚨🇺🇸 KHANNA: FILE REDACTIONS ARE PROTECTING “POWERFUL MEN” Rep. Ro Khanna says files released under a law he and Thomas Massie pushed reference “10 co-conspirators,” but key names remain blacked out. According to Khanna, the redactions aren’t about caution, they’re about shielding powerful men accused of abusing working-class girls or helping cover it up. Why this matters: transparency laws are supposed to expose wrongdoing, not sanitize it, and redactions like this fuel public distrust. The documents are out, but accountability is still missing… and that’s the part people are noticing. Rep. Khanna: “This is not that complicated… just release the FBI files where the survivors were interviewed. Some of the names are famous names, a lot of them are financial people in powerful positions… not all of them abused underaged girls, but some of them were at parties where there were 13 year old's paraded naked. Some of them had girls trafficked to them, and some of them actually did abuse underaged girls Release those files! They’re hiding it. If they were honest, they’re hiding it because they’re protecting people… affiliates of Trump. This Epstein class needs to be held accountable.” Source: Ro Khanna, Thomas Massie

Mario Nawfal

107,539 views • 7 months ago

Chris Murphy: "He wouldn't be going through all of this effort to try to stop the release of these files if he wasn't seriously implicated in those files. This is most likely the biggest corruption scandal in the history of the country. We know that because Trump is going to these extraordinary lengths to stop these files from coming out."

Chris Murphy: "He wouldn't be going through all of this effort to try to stop the release of these files if he wasn't seriously implicated in those files. This is most likely the biggest corruption scandal in the history of the country. We know that because Trump is going to these extraordinary lengths to stop these files from coming out."

Aaron Rupar

72,763 views • 8 months ago

He did that to a 13 year old child and he's a teacher? Maybe the press in Lewiston NE can find out if there are any repercussions.

He did that to a 13 year old child and he's a teacher? Maybe the press in Lewiston NE can find out if there are any repercussions.

TizzyEnt

535,737 views • 3 years ago

Rep. Khanna: I'm going to be looking at whether the appropriate documents were released. We need to see the 302 forms. That's where the survivors mention the other rich and powerful men who abused them. And second, are the prosecution memos being released? This is the document that shows why these rich and powerful men weren't prosecuted.

Rep. Khanna: I'm going to be looking at whether the appropriate documents were released. We need to see the 302 forms. That's where the survivors mention the other rich and powerful men who abused them. And second, are the prosecution memos being released? This is the document that shows why these rich and powerful men weren't prosecuted.

FactPost

49,029 views • 6 months ago