Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Did the label throw everything behind Kendrick?💀 The issue here is regional loyalty. Every region supports their own artists. Problems arise when loyalty outweighs honesty and the music itself. When respected voices stop judging music fairly because they’ve already chosen a side. This was the same thing people saw...

12,322 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

So this whole ugly beef really started because Kendrick was given the Big 3 moment and he publicly rejected it with “it’s just big me.” Kendrick was just refusing a hierarchy. Now there is rumors of Kendrick being on a J. Cole album with Drake after all this supposed “culture war.” So what was the point of all that division? all that moral grandstanding? I guess it was just about positioning. I believe, the industry needed a counterweight to Drake, someone they can market as the “pure” alternative, and Kendrick was it. Here’s why I think Drizzy should never do a project with Kendrick nearby: When Drake shows up- he brings the world with him-streams, playlists, headlines, and attention. If Drake were on an album with Kendrick, Drake would activate the culture, but the story would become “Kendrick outshined him,” even if Drake made the actual hits. That’s how narratives work. Drake would create the success, and Kendrick would get the credit, just like what happened in the beef. That power trip beef by UMG was all about narrative laundering. So Drake staying away is the smart move. Without Drake, Kendrick has to stand on his music alone, no giant spotlight, no built-in villain, no automatic attention from being next to the biggest star in the genre. Look at that Playboi Carti project: no Drake, no real peak, no lasting impact. And that’s exactly what Kendrick’s team doesn’t want tested, again. At the end of the day, it’s simple: Drake doesn’t need Kendrick to win. Kendrick needs Drake to matter. And that imbalance is what this whole “beef” was really built on. 🦉

industrypolitics

55,197 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

This🔥 This video hit differently, and it's not because it’s about rap and the beef. But because of how the Librarian said it. In a country where Black men already carry heavy stereotypes, there are certain lines you don’t cross when it comes to each other, not for clicks, not for strategy, not for a win. And Kendrick? For many, he wasn’t just any rapper. He was supposed to be different. The one people pointed to as “principled”, representing something deeper for blacks. That’s why it hit harder, and many of us are now angry and stand against him on principle. For many of us, it’s not even about picking sides; at first, it’s about the standard. Because if Drake (my favorite rapper of all time) had said the same things about Kendrick, I’d feel the same way. No hesitation- I would have cut him off like I did Kendrick. Some accusations don’t stay in music; they follow real people, real lives. And putting that on a Black man, knowing how this country and most of the world already operate? That’s where many of us draw the line. So yeah- this video captures it perfectly. The frustration. The disappointment and the shift in many of us. Because when Kendrick, the one who was seen as “different”, moves like everyone else, you have to question if it was ever real at all. I have zero respect for Kendrick because what he did to the hip-hop culture and the betrayal of another Black man is unforgivable. Give it up for @ Librarian👏🏽👏🏽

industrypolitics

14,641 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

naenia ¹ ⁶³

29,833 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

This father left his son in the car in the middle of winter in MN and when ICE agents took the child to his residence the people who lived there wouldn’t even open the door. The media in this country isn’t just a bunch of liars and degenerates, they are evil. You can’t get it wrong like this unless you are trying to mislead people. It’s truly sickening to watch. And what’s even more sickening is that these leftist women who have no idea what they’re talking about virtue signal and attack moms who do know because I’ve already seen the video footage of where this child was held and it is a very nice facility so nice in fact that it looks like the library of a neighborhood in a very high property tax area. They never have to correct their lies and this is not just a question of how you report something. This is straight up lies and propaganda. I always wonder how these people sleep at night knowing they lie and emotionally terrorize people for a living, and believe me they know they see the same footage and hear the same thing that normal people here they just don’t care. I’m not excusing the liberal women who don’t take the time to educate themselves on the truth, but I think that the media makes getting to the truth extremely difficult on purpose and it’s really a cancer in our society at this point. And they’re so little that can be done because I am a free speech, absolute and I will never support laws that restrict freedom in this country because they don’t just restrict the freedom of those who abuse it they restrict the freedom of those who don’t abuse it and for that reason, we’re all just gonna have to suffer because the media is a bunch of paid agitators. Like the protestors.

Insurrection Barbie

96,853 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Let’s talk Grammy. The most outrageous part of the night wasn’t a speech. It was watching a moment that visually screamed blackface pass without consequence, and then watching selective outrage play out in real time and in the days that followed. What was done to Drake wasn’t just criticism. It was the weaponization of the culture’s own internal scars and stereotypes against a Black man. Every historical stain ever used against Black people was recycled and redeployed from inside the culture and pinned onto him. Because it was the one language everyone already understood and felt: Culture vulture. Not Black enough. Inauthentic. Industry-made. Moral suspicion. Predatory narratives. They even reached for blackface- stripped of its context. Those accusations worked because they tapped into our shared pain, the used old policing tools “profiling” laundered through “cultural discourse,” and made it feel righteous instead of what they actually were. They were things we’ve all seen done to us from the outside and felt on the inside. That’s why the accusations were effective. That’s why they spread. That’s how they initially won over regular people. Your initial reaction was never organic, the labels, used the tactics of profiling, and our pain to make Drake the bad guy. And that’s where the black-face contrast matters. When Drake used blackface as commentary, to expose how Black artists are treated, it became a permanent stain. But when a whyt man appears on the Grammys stage doing something that visually reads as blackface, there is no outrage to be found. He was rewarded with applause, and you all outrage at a speech praising hard working immigrants. If it’s really about the culture, why didn’t Kendrick Lamar or Pusha T say a word when someone used blackface right in front of them- on the very stage they stood on? That tells the truth. This was never about protecting Black culture. It was about gatekeeping it , using familiar wounds to rally the crowd and control who’s allowed to lead, dominate, and redefine the space, and who must be contained. They didn’t challenge Drake’s art, not once. They used the culture’s own scars as weapons to try to disqualify him. Because the outrage is built on shared scars, not shared principles. That’s why it only moves when it’s convenient. Because this was never really about the culture, but the “culture”. It was always about control. It was a strategy.

industrypolitics

19,415 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Charlie sounded the alarm for years. Most people did not want to hear it. Now look. For a long time, people could pretend it was just politics. Debate. Panels. Clips. Branding. Then reality cut through. And a lot of people on the right exposed themselves. They love the optics of a fight, the branding of a fight, the clicks that come with a fight. But when there was real pressure, they cracked. They hedged. They panicked. They turned on Trump instead of focusing on the people actually tearing this country apart. And yes, some of them should be ashamed for how they have gone after Erika Kirk. People who once stood next to Charlie now sound like opportunists picking through rubble, chasing attention instead of truth, loyalty, or basic decency. Then, right on cue, comes the rewrite. Now it is “why are we in Israel’s war?” Now it is “Trump is following Israel’s order.” As if Iran has not spent decades chanting “death to America,” funding terror, killing Americans, and threatening this country. Trump pointed to Iran after the attempt on his life, and still people pretend he is not America First. That should stop you cold. Because Charlie’s warning was not just about external threats. It was about internal decay. A country does not collapse all at once. It weakens. It gets divided. It gets demoralized. It gets trained to ignore what is right in front of it. It gets led by people who would rather manage decline than confront the people causing it. And I must admit, the left does have some admirable qualities. They use everything: courts, schools, media, unions, NGOs, city governments, prosecutors, bureaucracy. They use power like they intend to win. Too many Republicans act like they are waiting for permission. That is why Charlie kept saying the same thing over and over: It does not take everyone. It takes a small group who actually mean it, and who do not fold when the pressure hits. Some people heard him. Some people just used his name. And right now, some of the loudest voices on our side are proving they never understood a word he said.

Jammles

130,116 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce