Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Did you know Chris Evans turned down multiple Marvel return pitches after Avengers: Endgame? Chris Evans revealed that Marvel approached him several times about returning as Steve Rogers, including a pitch for Nomad. While he loved many of the ideas, none of them felt like the right continuation for...

24,414 просмотров • 5 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

WHY NICK FURY NEVER JOINED THE FINAL BATTLE IN AVENGERS: ENDGAME Many fans still wonder why Nick Fury wasn't fighting alongside the Avengers after being brought back by Hulk's Snap. Here's what actually happened: • Fury was dusted by Thanos at the end of Avengers: Infinity War, moments after sending the emergency pager to Captain Marvel. • When Hulk reversed the Blip five years later, Fury returned along with everyone else who had disappeared. • Despite being restored, Fury never appeared on the battlefield during the final fight against Thanos. According to Avengers: Endgame writers Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely, this was a deliberate creative decision. The battle already featured dozens of superheroes, and Fury's strength has always been his leadership, strategy, and intelligence—not frontline combat. Instead, Marvel chose to bring Fury back during Tony Stark's funeral, where he quietly paid tribute to the man who helped turn the Avengers Initiative into Earth's greatest team. In both the MCU and Marvel Comics, Nick Fury has never needed superpowers to be one of Marvel's most important characters. His greatest weapon has always been his ability to unite heroes when the world needs them most. Did Marvel make the right call by keeping Fury out of the Endgame battle, or should he have had one final moment on the battlefield? #NickFury #AvengersEndgame #AvengersInfinityWar #MarvelStudios #MCU #TonyStark #CaptainMarvel

A K

294,811 просмотров • 8 дней назад

Dr Dewi Evans spoke to Radio Wales Breakfast this morning. It is a fascinating interview—in particular, Evans' response to the question of whether he'd changed his mind on what caused Baby C's death. For context: Evans testified at trial that Lucy Letby murdered several babies by forcing air down their nasogastric tubes. But there is nothing in the scientific literature supporting this as a plausible method of murder—a fact Evans himself has had to concede post-trial. Evans has since recanted his theory, telling Channel 5 last summer that, "None of the babies were killed as a direct result of the injection of air, or fluid and air deliberately injected into their stomachs." More recently, Evans has denied that he ever recanted his original murder theory in the first place. The latest about-face came in response to Letby's new lawyer, Mark McDonald, announcing that he will seek to appeal Letby's convictions—based, in part, on Evans having changed his mind about this particular method of murder. And that brings us to Evans' interview this morning with Radio Wales Breakfast. When asked if he'd changed his mind about what caused Baby C's death, Evans equivocated. He told the interviewer that Letby may have "used both mechanisms"—meaning air forced down the nasogastric tube, and air injected directly into the baby's veins—and that, "either option was possible." It's a response reflective of the impossible position Evans has put himself in. He's no longer willing to stand by 'air forced down the nasogastric tube' as a feasible method of murder, but is similarly unwilling to admit that he's changed his mind.

The Trials of Lucy Letby

13,094 просмотров • 1 год назад