正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Did You Know That The Rape Gang Inquiry Cannot Touch Keir Starmer? The consultation summary report for the Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs was published in March 2026. It runs to 39 pages. Buried inside it is a structural decision that will define what this inquiry will not deliver.... show more
25,887 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)
0 条评论
暂无评论
原始帖子的评论将显示在这里
![A National Inquiry That Refuses to Name the Guilty Will Fail In 2013, the Home Affairs Select Committee recorded that senior officials in Rochdale and Rotherham had failed in their duty of care to children subjected to organised sexual abuse. The Committee identified responsibility up the chain of command. It named the council Chief Executive, the Director of Children’s Services, the Local Safeguarding Children Board, and individual practitioners. It recorded that senior figures claimed not to know about the abuse during years when it was documented by frontline staff. That claim of ignorance was rejected. The Committee stated it was no excuse. It stated that those in senior positions were responsible for the consequences of their inaction. Despite the conclusions of one of the most powerful government committees; - No criminal investigation into senior officials followed. - No police force opened misconduct inquiries into those named. - No minister referred the findings for prosecution. The Committee also recorded that Rotherham had secured 'no prosecutions relating to organised child sexual exploitation since 2010.' That finding was published in 2013. The first significant prosecutions in Rotherham relating to organised child sexual exploitation took place years later, following further public exposure and additional reports. Those prosecutions were brought ONLY against a handful of perpetrators. They did not include senior council officers, police commanders, or safeguarding leads identified in the earlier parliamentary findings. No individual named by Parliament in 2013 was charged. Political decisions taken after 2013 determined how these findings were handled. The Home Affairs Select Committee report was the closest the state came to pursuing those responsible for failing children and for suppressing the truth. It identified senior officials, rejected claims of ignorance, and stated that responsibility rested at the top. What followed was a retreat. The Jay Report documented prolonged abuse and institutional neglect in Rotherham. It confirmed the scale of harm already known to Parliament. It did not pursue criminal liability for senior officials. No referrals were made. Responsibility was redirected into local reform. Telford later confirmed industrial-scale exploitation and repeated police failure. Again, the findings did not lead to criminal proceedings against senior decision-makers. No prosecutions followed. In Greater Manchester, reviews were commissioned with terms that limited examination to organisational learning. Individual criminal responsibility was excluded from scope. That exclusion was accepted. No request was made to widen it. Across each case, the same decision was repeated; - record harm - exclude liability - move on. Language changed. Structures were altered. Senior figures exited quietly. Criminal accountability never followed. Only after years of pressure from victims, journalists, and campaigners has a National Inquiry been forced. That inquiry now sits at the same decision point reached in 2013. Whether to follow responsibility where Parliament already traced it or to retreat again. A National Inquiry has now been confirmed. Its Terms of Reference are being consulted on. Under the Inquiries Act 2005, an inquiry may act only within its Terms of Reference. If individual responsibility and criminal referral are not explicitly required, they can be lawfully avoided. Previous inquiries operated within those limits. Harm was described. Failures were recorded. Individuals were not named. Prosecution did not follow. This Inquiry will do the same unless its remit is written differently. What You Can Do Now Contact your MP and ask one question only. Will they write to Baroness Anne Longfield demanding that the Terms of Reference explicitly require the Inquiry to name individuals, examine political decision-making, make findings where conduct may meet criminal thresholds, and refer cases for prosecution. Responses will be published. Silence will be recorded. The consultation closes soon. After that, the outcome is already set. Use the draft below. Do not deviate from it. Subject: Will you write to Anne Longfield on Inquiry powers and accountability? Dear [MP NAME], In 2013, Parliament’s Home Affairs Select Committee recorded that senior officials had failed in their duty of care to children subjected to organised sexual abuse. Those officials were identified. No prosecutions followed. Under section 5(5) of the Inquiries Act 2005, a statutory inquiry may act only within its Terms of Reference. Unless individual accountability and referral are explicitly required, an inquiry can avoid naming individuals or recommending criminal investigation. Will you write to Baroness Anne Longfield requesting that the Terms of Reference explicitly require the Inquiry to: - identify by name individuals whose acts or omissions may meet criminal thresholds, including misconduct in public office; and - refer such cases to the police and the Crown Prosecution Service. Please confirm, yes or no, whether you will do so. Yours sincerely, [NAME] _________ I need your help. My work is free. No paywalls. No gatekeeping. No exclusions. Because the truth shouldn’t belong only to those who can afford it. I’m Raja Miah MBE. For seven years, I led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs and helped force a national inquiry. You won’t see me on the BBC. You won’t read my work in the legacy press. That’s not an accident. I take this to a place from where there is no coming back. I document everything in my newsletter. It’s 100% free to read. If this work matters to you, if you believe it must continue, I need your backing. 🔴 Supporting me costs as little as 75p a week (£30 a year): 👉 If you can’t do monthly, a one-off contribution genuinely helps keep this alive: 👉 👉 We’re up against a machine, politicians, police, officials, and media, working together to shrink, sanitise, and bury the truth. This work survives because of you. If you’ve ever shared my posts, learned something, or felt less alone reading them, stand with me. Raja 🙏](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2018273989907435748/amplify_video_thumb/2018268637962948608/img/tgdxCF4onLLtqY8i.jpg)
