Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨 DID YOU KNOW the “security footage” released around the Trump assassination attempt may show signs of AI generation… and almost nobody is asking why? Not a conspiracy. Not a meme. Frame-by-frame anomalies. Visual artifacts. Timing problems. Continuity breaks. Publicly available footage. Open-source analysis. Good thing your boy lives...

realjesseonfire's profile picture

🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥

49,854 subscribers

19,224 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Michael Fanone’s Bodycam Raises Serious Questions | Full Evidence Breakdown So it’s time to slow this down and look at the evidence. What you are watching here is body worn camera video attributed to Michael Fanone. This frame matters. Because it directly contradicts public claims that he was unconscious at this moment. If someone is fully out, they are not adjusting equipment. That is not an opinion. That is a physical reality. This is why I’m releasing this in parts. Because the full picture requires multiple angles. Bodycam footage. CCTV footage. Open-source crowd video. And court transcripts. I’m not asking you to believe me. I’m asking you to watch the footage and compare it to sworn testimony. If the story is accurate, it should match the video. If it does not match the video, people have the right to ask questions. This is not about attacking law enforcement. I genuinely want to believe not every officer acted improperly that day. But accountability requires honesty. And silence from those who know better only deepens mistrust. I’ve already lost enough. My reputation matters. I would not put this out if the evidence didn’t support scrutiny. This is not about violence. It’s about truth. It’s about transparency. And it’s about due process. More footage and full context will follow. 🫡🇺🇸 Watch closely. Decide for yourself.
2:55

Michael Fanone’s Bodycam Raises Serious Questions | Full Evidence Breakdown So it’s time to slow this down and look at the evidence. What you are watching here is body worn camera video attributed to Michael Fanone. This frame matters. Because it directly contradicts public claims that he was unconscious at this moment. If someone is fully out, they are not adjusting equipment. That is not an opinion. That is a physical reality. This is why I’m releasing this in parts. Because the full picture requires multiple angles. Bodycam footage. CCTV footage. Open-source crowd video. And court transcripts. I’m not asking you to believe me. I’m asking you to watch the footage and compare it to sworn testimony. If the story is accurate, it should match the video. If it does not match the video, people have the right to ask questions. This is not about attacking law enforcement. I genuinely want to believe not every officer acted improperly that day. But accountability requires honesty. And silence from those who know better only deepens mistrust. I’ve already lost enough. My reputation matters. I would not put this out if the evidence didn’t support scrutiny. This is not about violence. It’s about truth. It’s about transparency. And it’s about due process. More footage and full context will follow. 🫡🇺🇸 Watch closely. Decide for yourself.

Ryan Nichols Sr.

88,936 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨😳 I FOUND SOMETHING TERRIFYING IN THE KARMELO ANTHONY FOOTAGE... 😳🚨 The more I slowed this video down frame-by-frame, the WEIRDER it got. 👀 Am I the only one seeing shadow-like figures, strange distortions, and movements that don't seem to make sense? 🤯 Some people say it's just low-quality footage. Others are asking whether key details are being hidden in plain sight. 🕵️‍♂️⚠️ The deeper I looked, the more questions I had... and now I can't unsee it. 😬 Watch the breakdown and tell me what YOU see. 👇 🔥 Are those just video artifacts... 🔥 Or is there something else going on in this footage? Sound off in the comments. ⬇️💬 #KarmeloAnthony #AustinMetcalf #TrueCrime #CrimeNews #BreakingNews #VideoAnalysis #Mystery #Conspiracy #ViralNews #InvestigateEverything
15:27

🚨😳 I FOUND SOMETHING TERRIFYING IN THE KARMELO ANTHONY FOOTAGE... 😳🚨 The more I slowed this video down frame-by-frame, the WEIRDER it got. 👀 Am I the only one seeing shadow-like figures, strange distortions, and movements that don't seem to make sense? 🤯 Some people say it's just low-quality footage. Others are asking whether key details are being hidden in plain sight. 🕵️‍♂️⚠️ The deeper I looked, the more questions I had... and now I can't unsee it. 😬 Watch the breakdown and tell me what YOU see. 👇 🔥 Are those just video artifacts... 🔥 Or is there something else going on in this footage? Sound off in the comments. ⬇️💬 #KarmeloAnthony #AustinMetcalf #TrueCrime #CrimeNews #BreakingNews #VideoAnalysis #Mystery #Conspiracy #ViralNews #InvestigateEverything

DONAT

27,446 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨WATCH CLOSELY: There’s Something Flying Across the Screen No One’s Noticed Until Now —It Changes Everything About The Charlie Kirk Shooting 👀”😳 Something wild is happening in this footage. If you slow it down, you can actually see what looks like a projectile flying across the screen — moving in a perfect line toward the same position many believe the alleged sniper was located. This is the first time this clip has been shown publicly, and it raises major questions about what really happened that day. From our frame-by-frame review, there are clear signs of coordination — movements, timing, and positioning that don’t seem random. Were there multiple people involved? Was this bigger than anyone realized?
1:20

🚨WATCH CLOSELY: There’s Something Flying Across the Screen No One’s Noticed Until Now —It Changes Everything About The Charlie Kirk Shooting 👀”😳 Something wild is happening in this footage. If you slow it down, you can actually see what looks like a projectile flying across the screen — moving in a perfect line toward the same position many believe the alleged sniper was located. This is the first time this clip has been shown publicly, and it raises major questions about what really happened that day. From our frame-by-frame review, there are clear signs of coordination — movements, timing, and positioning that don’t seem random. Were there multiple people involved? Was this bigger than anyone realized?

Project Constitution

102,449 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Never-before-seen J6 bodycam footage. MPD Officer Michael Dowling. Lower West Terrace tunnel. January 6, 2021. On his own body-worn camera, officers can be heard talking about a flagpole like it was a weapon. You hear them say it. You hear the laughter. You hear the bragging. You hear the “you put in work” energy. You hear the kind of conversation America was never supposed to hear. And here is the part people need to understand: I found this in my own evidence. Not because the media showed it. Not because the government volunteered it. Not because anyone handed it to me. I found it by digging through the discovery they buried me in, piece by piece, file by file, from notes I first started making while I was locked in a D.C. jail cell with a pencil and a piece of paper. That is why they do not want J6 defendants online. That is why they do not want us organizing evidence. That is why they do not want us building databases. That is why they do not want us publishing. Because when we can search, clip, compare, name, date, and preserve the record, the story starts changing. This is one tape. There is more coming. Names. Dates. Footage. Documents. The tape is the tape. Watch it for yourself. Then ask why America had to wait this long to hear it. Read the full story:
2:04

Never-before-seen J6 bodycam footage. MPD Officer Michael Dowling. Lower West Terrace tunnel. January 6, 2021. On his own body-worn camera, officers can be heard talking about a flagpole like it was a weapon. You hear them say it. You hear the laughter. You hear the bragging. You hear the “you put in work” energy. You hear the kind of conversation America was never supposed to hear. And here is the part people need to understand: I found this in my own evidence. Not because the media showed it. Not because the government volunteered it. Not because anyone handed it to me. I found it by digging through the discovery they buried me in, piece by piece, file by file, from notes I first started making while I was locked in a D.C. jail cell with a pencil and a piece of paper. That is why they do not want J6 defendants online. That is why they do not want us organizing evidence. That is why they do not want us building databases. That is why they do not want us publishing. Because when we can search, clip, compare, name, date, and preserve the record, the story starts changing. This is one tape. There is more coming. Names. Dates. Footage. Documents. The tape is the tape. Watch it for yourself. Then ask why America had to wait this long to hear it. Read the full story:

Ryan Nichols Sr.

22,063 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

MAJOR UFO UAP ALERT…👀🛸 This appears to be footage from the Varginha Brazil UFO UAP footage that James Fox was talking about. I still have to asses validity but from the images it does seem to be old video camera image similar to what was available in 1996. I can’t confirm yet all I have is a source: Ovnilogia (Telegram) If this is real we got a MAJOR update on the case… The witnesses did say the UFO looked like a bus and it was on fire….🔥 If this is real O-M-G, we absolutely need someone to validate if it’s AI. What do you think?
2:01

MAJOR UFO UAP ALERT…👀🛸 This appears to be footage from the Varginha Brazil UFO UAP footage that James Fox was talking about. I still have to asses validity but from the images it does seem to be old video camera image similar to what was available in 1996. I can’t confirm yet all I have is a source: Ovnilogia (Telegram) If this is real we got a MAJOR update on the case… The witnesses did say the UFO looked like a bus and it was on fire….🔥 If this is real O-M-G, we absolutely need someone to validate if it’s AI. What do you think?

Just

65,155 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

This may seem "too good to be true", but it isn't AI, fake, or BS. The creator, "function.3d", is known for specializing in open-source recycling projects. The machine you see in the video is likely the PETALOT, a high-quality, open-source filament recycler designed by Function 3D. You can even find the technical CAD files and assembly guides on GitHub if you want to build one yourself.
2:32

This may seem "too good to be true", but it isn't AI, fake, or BS. The creator, "function.3d", is known for specializing in open-source recycling projects. The machine you see in the video is likely the PETALOT, a high-quality, open-source filament recycler designed by Function 3D. You can even find the technical CAD files and assembly guides on GitHub if you want to build one yourself.

J∅kër Kîng 👑

40,502 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨EXCLUSIVE: New Photos Show Mystery Figure on the Roof Before Charlie Kirk Was Shot —Did We Just Spot the REAL Shooter? You have to see this. Photos show someone (or something) on the roof near the stairwell before Charlie Kirk was shot — and gone after. If this can be corroborated with other known video footage this could be the most important lead yet. Here’s what’s wild: The roof location in these pics lines up with the area we all believe the shot came from. That makes this evidence potentially huge. But there’s a sticking point: we also have a clear muzzle flash in the alcove next to the stairwell in other footage. If the person on the roof is the shooter, that muzzle flash doesn’t fit the timeline — so either the what's seen on video is not a muzzle flash, or there could be more than one shooter. Bottom line: this raises more questions than it answers — and that’s exactly why we need full transparency. If you care about the truth, here’s what we need now: Timestamped originals of these roof photos and any adjacent video from that day. This could confirm the shooter’s position — or expose inconsistencies in the timeline that demand a full review. Don’t jump to conclusions; let's look at all angles and demand a full investigation. Share this if you want the footage released and the truth revealed. 👀🔎
0:31

🚨EXCLUSIVE: New Photos Show Mystery Figure on the Roof Before Charlie Kirk Was Shot —Did We Just Spot the REAL Shooter? You have to see this. Photos show someone (or something) on the roof near the stairwell before Charlie Kirk was shot — and gone after. If this can be corroborated with other known video footage this could be the most important lead yet. Here’s what’s wild: The roof location in these pics lines up with the area we all believe the shot came from. That makes this evidence potentially huge. But there’s a sticking point: we also have a clear muzzle flash in the alcove next to the stairwell in other footage. If the person on the roof is the shooter, that muzzle flash doesn’t fit the timeline — so either the what's seen on video is not a muzzle flash, or there could be more than one shooter. Bottom line: this raises more questions than it answers — and that’s exactly why we need full transparency. If you care about the truth, here’s what we need now: Timestamped originals of these roof photos and any adjacent video from that day. This could confirm the shooter’s position — or expose inconsistencies in the timeline that demand a full review. Don’t jump to conclusions; let's look at all angles and demand a full investigation. Share this if you want the footage released and the truth revealed. 👀🔎

Project Constitution

296,671 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

‼️ New Roof Footage Appears To Show SECOND PERSON Sprinting Toward Shooter’s Position On Losee ROOF During Charlie Kirk Assassination 👀 This clip appears to show a second person on the roof of the Losee Center sprinting toward the exact corner the shot allegedly came from. Watch it closely. Right as the shot rings out, you can see what looks like a second figure moving across the roof. It almost appears as if someone tried to remove that person from the footage frame by frame — but they didn’t do a clean job. A faint “ghost” image of the running figure remains visible. The official story has always claimed a single shooter. This footage raises serious questions about whether that narrative is accurate — or whether someone was deliberately scrubbed from the video. If this was edited, the question becomes: Who was really on that roof? The more footage that surfaces, the more the single-shooter story starts to crack. Watch the clip and tell me what you see. More coming. Follow for the receipts they don’t want you to have. From: Joel FOLLOW Them! CC: Candace Owens
1:04

‼️ New Roof Footage Appears To Show SECOND PERSON Sprinting Toward Shooter’s Position On Losee ROOF During Charlie Kirk Assassination 👀 This clip appears to show a second person on the roof of the Losee Center sprinting toward the exact corner the shot allegedly came from. Watch it closely. Right as the shot rings out, you can see what looks like a second figure moving across the roof. It almost appears as if someone tried to remove that person from the footage frame by frame — but they didn’t do a clean job. A faint “ghost” image of the running figure remains visible. The official story has always claimed a single shooter. This footage raises serious questions about whether that narrative is accurate — or whether someone was deliberately scrubbed from the video. If this was edited, the question becomes: Who was really on that roof? The more footage that surfaces, the more the single-shooter story starts to crack. Watch the clip and tell me what you see. More coming. Follow for the receipts they don’t want you to have. From: Joel FOLLOW Them! CC: Candace Owens

Project Constitution

983,983 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

During DLSS 5 Hands-On Video, YouTube creator Hot Hardware asked Nvidia employees this question about the computational cost of DLSS 5 when you move around in the game and it really caught my eye on how they hesitated on showing any DLSS 5 footage during motion. Every time that he moved the character, he would turn off DLSS 5 first then move to a different in-game location and then turn it on, or if DLSS 5 was turned on the movement was very slow and controlled. I know this is still work in progress, but it really begs the question "why wouldn't they show any this?" or "why show DLSS 5 this early?" I tried freezing some shots when another character is in motion to check if there are any artifacts when DLSS 5 is turned on. As suspected, I did come across some artifacts with UI elements, character popping out of the UI element and ghosting/artifacts behind the character. Its still not the best way to judge these small details that you can clearly see if a footage is recorded in-game, but then again its not like Nvidia provided any of them during DLSS 5 marketing campaign. Whenever this is still going to be present by the time DLSS 5 launches remains to be seen, however as of right now it doesn't look like it will handle fast-paced motion quite well and I don't know how well this "controlled AI-generated" rendering will scale to weaker GPUs in the RTX 50 series
1:35

During DLSS 5 Hands-On Video, YouTube creator Hot Hardware asked Nvidia employees this question about the computational cost of DLSS 5 when you move around in the game and it really caught my eye on how they hesitated on showing any DLSS 5 footage during motion. Every time that he moved the character, he would turn off DLSS 5 first then move to a different in-game location and then turn it on, or if DLSS 5 was turned on the movement was very slow and controlled. I know this is still work in progress, but it really begs the question "why wouldn't they show any this?" or "why show DLSS 5 this early?" I tried freezing some shots when another character is in motion to check if there are any artifacts when DLSS 5 is turned on. As suspected, I did come across some artifacts with UI elements, character popping out of the UI element and ghosting/artifacts behind the character. Its still not the best way to judge these small details that you can clearly see if a footage is recorded in-game, but then again its not like Nvidia provided any of them during DLSS 5 marketing campaign. Whenever this is still going to be present by the time DLSS 5 launches remains to be seen, however as of right now it doesn't look like it will handle fast-paced motion quite well and I don't know how well this "controlled AI-generated" rendering will scale to weaker GPUs in the RTX 50 series

NikTek

210,606 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

NEW🚨🚨 There is a video in the Jeffrey Epstein files that seem to show a figure with oblong and glowing eyes being subjected to some kind of rapid acceleration testing in a two-seat pod alongside another figure. The footage is censored but one face moves below the bar for a few frames. There is also one point where the entity in the right seat (when looking at the footage head on) has appendages that don't appear to be hands (they seem to be closer to claws or something of that nature). Source = EFTA01683320.mp4 The full video file is 2 hours 44 minutes and 11 seconds long, but it appears that footage of the experiment is visible for only the first two minutes or so of footage. I am requesting some help looking at this video footage and, in turn, I have upscaled it to 4k and provided it in three speeds below (1x, .5 and .25x). I am almost certain that this is a non-human entity but, as a reporter and an academic, I am not going to make that conclusion without further input from independent video analysts (and after proper scientific methods are applied to this footage).
19:06

NEW🚨🚨 There is a video in the Jeffrey Epstein files that seem to show a figure with oblong and glowing eyes being subjected to some kind of rapid acceleration testing in a two-seat pod alongside another figure. The footage is censored but one face moves below the bar for a few frames. There is also one point where the entity in the right seat (when looking at the footage head on) has appendages that don't appear to be hands (they seem to be closer to claws or something of that nature). Source = EFTA01683320.mp4 The full video file is 2 hours 44 minutes and 11 seconds long, but it appears that footage of the experiment is visible for only the first two minutes or so of footage. I am requesting some help looking at this video footage and, in turn, I have upscaled it to 4k and provided it in three speeds below (1x, .5 and .25x). I am almost certain that this is a non-human entity but, as a reporter and an academic, I am not going to make that conclusion without further input from independent video analysts (and after proper scientific methods are applied to this footage).

Grant Smith Ellis

631,132 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨 NEW FBI FOOTAGE JUST DROPPED… AND THE REAL QUESTIONS START NOW 🚨 Pause the emotions… start the analysis. Who is this individual? Where exactly was this filmed? What was the timeline relative to the disappearance? What behavior stands out when you slow the footage down? Watch for: … body language inconsistencies … direction of movement vs reported timeline … objects carried or concealed … interaction with surroundings or surveillance awareness Too often people react emotionally instead of observing objectively. Real investigation asks: Does this person appear familiar with the area? Are movements purposeful or random? Is there hesitation, scanning, or avoidance of cameras? Details matter. Slow it down. Watch frame by frame. Ask what doesn’t fit. Because truth hides in the seconds people scroll past. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove
0:39

🚨 NEW FBI FOOTAGE JUST DROPPED… AND THE REAL QUESTIONS START NOW 🚨 Pause the emotions… start the analysis. Who is this individual? Where exactly was this filmed? What was the timeline relative to the disappearance? What behavior stands out when you slow the footage down? Watch for: … body language inconsistencies … direction of movement vs reported timeline … objects carried or concealed … interaction with surroundings or surveillance awareness Too often people react emotionally instead of observing objectively. Real investigation asks: Does this person appear familiar with the area? Are movements purposeful or random? Is there hesitation, scanning, or avoidance of cameras? Details matter. Slow it down. Watch frame by frame. Ask what doesn’t fit. Because truth hides in the seconds people scroll past. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

130,693 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🚨 BREAKING: Court Footage of Tyler James Robinson Doesn’t Match – Was It Edited? 🚨 A behavior analysis expert just uncovered a BOMBSHELL in Tyler James Robinson’s initial court appearance video. It doesn’t add up. 👉 The footage aired by ABC News is NOT the same as the footage broadcast by a local Salt Lake City outlet (KUTV2). He synced the audio himslef, side by side. Here’s the problem: In the ABC News version, Robinson nods right as the judge says he targeted Charlie Kirk for his political beliefs. To the casual eye, it looks like an admission. In the KUTV2 version, that same nod doesn’t happen until AFTER the charges are concluded — just a routine acknowledgement, not an admission. The difference is massive. Was the ABC clip intentionally doctored to shape a narrative? Or is this just a “technical sync error”? If so… why does it only appear on ABC’s version, and not on any others? In high-profile cases like this, where the FBI’s narrative is already under heavy scrutiny, discrepancies like this matter. Because one version shows Robinson agreeing with motive, and the other does not. This raises urgent questions: ⚠️ Which video is authentic? ⚠️ Who handled the feeds? ⚠️ Why are we watching pixelated, laggy footage in 2025 that looks like it was filmed on a potato? Something here is very, very wrong. SHOUTOUT TO: The OP (The Behavioral Arts) On Youtube. I will add the link to their full video in the comments below, i highly suggest you go watch. 👀 Drop your thoughts below — do you think this was a sloppy sync issue, or deliberate manipulation?
5:30

🚨 BREAKING: Court Footage of Tyler James Robinson Doesn’t Match – Was It Edited? 🚨 A behavior analysis expert just uncovered a BOMBSHELL in Tyler James Robinson’s initial court appearance video. It doesn’t add up. 👉 The footage aired by ABC News is NOT the same as the footage broadcast by a local Salt Lake City outlet (KUTV2). He synced the audio himslef, side by side. Here’s the problem: In the ABC News version, Robinson nods right as the judge says he targeted Charlie Kirk for his political beliefs. To the casual eye, it looks like an admission. In the KUTV2 version, that same nod doesn’t happen until AFTER the charges are concluded — just a routine acknowledgement, not an admission. The difference is massive. Was the ABC clip intentionally doctored to shape a narrative? Or is this just a “technical sync error”? If so… why does it only appear on ABC’s version, and not on any others? In high-profile cases like this, where the FBI’s narrative is already under heavy scrutiny, discrepancies like this matter. Because one version shows Robinson agreeing with motive, and the other does not. This raises urgent questions: ⚠️ Which video is authentic? ⚠️ Who handled the feeds? ⚠️ Why are we watching pixelated, laggy footage in 2025 that looks like it was filmed on a potato? Something here is very, very wrong. SHOUTOUT TO: The OP (The Behavioral Arts) On Youtube. I will add the link to their full video in the comments below, i highly suggest you go watch. 👀 Drop your thoughts below — do you think this was a sloppy sync issue, or deliberate manipulation?

Project Constitution

69,355 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

‼️BOMBSHELL: New UVU Surveillance Footage Shows the Alleged Assassin Had TWO Phones — Plus One Minute Of The Video SUSPICIOUSLY Cut.🤔 New analysis of the UVU parking garage and stairwell surveillance footage raises major questions about the official story. The bulge in the individual’s pocket that many claimed was a rifle barrel appears to be a cell phone. You can clearly see him place a phone into his right pocket — yet something still remains in his left hand, suggesting he may have been carrying two phones. Even more concerning, approximately one full minute of the video appears to have been cut out during this sequence. Why was that portion removed, and what does it show? When the individual enters the parking garage, he stops and appears to look directly at a specific vehicle before heading up the stairwell. That same vehicle then stops, reverses, and appears to drive up to the next level. Was this person being watched or followed the entire time? These details don’t fit the lone-wolf narrative cleanly. The more footage that surfaces, the more questions emerge.
2:03

‼️BOMBSHELL: New UVU Surveillance Footage Shows the Alleged Assassin Had TWO Phones — Plus One Minute Of The Video SUSPICIOUSLY Cut.🤔 New analysis of the UVU parking garage and stairwell surveillance footage raises major questions about the official story. The bulge in the individual’s pocket that many claimed was a rifle barrel appears to be a cell phone. You can clearly see him place a phone into his right pocket — yet something still remains in his left hand, suggesting he may have been carrying two phones. Even more concerning, approximately one full minute of the video appears to have been cut out during this sequence. Why was that portion removed, and what does it show? When the individual enters the parking garage, he stops and appears to look directly at a specific vehicle before heading up the stairwell. That same vehicle then stops, reverses, and appears to drive up to the next level. Was this person being watched or followed the entire time? These details don’t fit the lone-wolf narrative cleanly. The more footage that surfaces, the more questions emerge.

Project Constitution

62,264 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 NASA RELEASES “ARTEMIS CREW” FOOTAGE — BUT SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG A man breaking down the official video says something isn’t adding up. Not just “it looks weird.” Something specific. Watch closely. He says this isn’t compression. You can record a video multiple times, it won’t erase subjects from screens or create inconsistencies like this. And now others are starting to notice the same thing. So what exactly are we looking at here? And why release footage like this in the first place?
1:13

🚨 NASA RELEASES “ARTEMIS CREW” FOOTAGE — BUT SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG A man breaking down the official video says something isn’t adding up. Not just “it looks weird.” Something specific. Watch closely. He says this isn’t compression. You can record a video multiple times, it won’t erase subjects from screens or create inconsistencies like this. And now others are starting to notice the same thing. So what exactly are we looking at here? And why release footage like this in the first place?

HustleBitch

106,937 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

They don’t want you to see this 🚨 The captain tells everyone the first person passed from “natural causes” and that the doctor confirmed it ⚠️ “NOT INFECTIOUS” Everyone standing around in a group 🤔 The record was later corrected… but this footage is still out there 👀
0:22

They don’t want you to see this 🚨 The captain tells everyone the first person passed from “natural causes” and that the doctor confirmed it ⚠️ “NOT INFECTIOUS” Everyone standing around in a group 🤔 The record was later corrected… but this footage is still out there 👀

Matt Wallace

995,643 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

WHAT IS THE TRUTH Richard Heart? NOBODY WITH A FOLLOWING HAS THE BALLS TO TAG YOU AND ASK THE EXACT QUESTION THEY WANT TO KNOW............. I DO! I THINK THE BIG QUESTION PEOPLE HAVE, NOT ME, I COULD CARE LESS, BUT OTHERS WANT TO KNOW, THOSE PEOPLE THAT YOU HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH...... ARE THEY BEING BAD ACTORS ON #PULSECHAIN? IF YOU CAN NOT ANSWER WHY OR WHY NOT, I UNDERSTAND WHY........ THEY DON'T. LIKE AND RETWEET IF YOU ARE NOT A COWARD AND WANT THE ANSWER TO THIS ABOUT $PDAI IF YOU WANT TO ASK YOUR QUESTION, FEEL FREE IN THE COMMENTS. EITHER WAY, I'M GOOD
0:22

WHAT IS THE TRUTH Richard Heart? NOBODY WITH A FOLLOWING HAS THE BALLS TO TAG YOU AND ASK THE EXACT QUESTION THEY WANT TO KNOW............. I DO! I THINK THE BIG QUESTION PEOPLE HAVE, NOT ME, I COULD CARE LESS, BUT OTHERS WANT TO KNOW, THOSE PEOPLE THAT YOU HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH...... ARE THEY BEING BAD ACTORS ON #PULSECHAIN? IF YOU CAN NOT ANSWER WHY OR WHY NOT, I UNDERSTAND WHY........ THEY DON'T. LIKE AND RETWEET IF YOU ARE NOT A COWARD AND WANT THE ANSWER TO THIS ABOUT $PDAI IF YOU WANT TO ASK YOUR QUESTION, FEEL FREE IN THE COMMENTS. EITHER WAY, I'M GOOD

MOON KING B-ROOTS

25,821 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"They want to try to frame all this as if this is all around Jared Verse. I get why you want to dress it up. The reality is you made this trade because you thought it was the best strategic move for the #Browns in order to be better 2-3 years from now." 🚨 Jonathan Peterlin and Nick Wilson on Andrew Berry's perception of the Myles Garrett trade 🏈
1:07

"They want to try to frame all this as if this is all around Jared Verse. I get why you want to dress it up. The reality is you made this trade because you thought it was the best strategic move for the #Browns in order to be better 2-3 years from now." 🚨 Jonathan Peterlin and Nick Wilson on Andrew Berry's perception of the Myles Garrett trade 🏈

92.3 The Fan

11,242 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Wake up! This is exactly what they don’t want you to notice. Artemis 2 didn’t go “to space” at all. It launched, then immediately veered off sideways straight toward the Bermuda Triangle. Everything you see after that? Pure fabrication AI generated visuals and studio footage designed to sell the illusion that they’re floating around in some fake outer space. It’s all a production, not a mission, but an illusion. This is proof.
1:53

Wake up! This is exactly what they don’t want you to notice. Artemis 2 didn’t go “to space” at all. It launched, then immediately veered off sideways straight toward the Bermuda Triangle. Everything you see after that? Pure fabrication AI generated visuals and studio footage designed to sell the illusion that they’re floating around in some fake outer space. It’s all a production, not a mission, but an illusion. This is proof.

FLAT EARTH LIBRARY

1,695,224 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Wake up! This is exactly what they don’t want you to notice. Artemis 2 didn’t go “to space” at all. It launched, then immediately veered off sideways straight toward the Bermuda Triangle. Everything you see after that? Pure fabrication AI generated visuals and studio footage designed to sell the illusion that they’re floating around in some fake outer space. It’s all a production, not a mission, but an illusion. This is proof.
1:53

Wake up! This is exactly what they don’t want you to notice. Artemis 2 didn’t go “to space” at all. It launched, then immediately veered off sideways straight toward the Bermuda Triangle. Everything you see after that? Pure fabrication AI generated visuals and studio footage designed to sell the illusion that they’re floating around in some fake outer space. It’s all a production, not a mission, but an illusion. This is proof.

Doc 

10,929 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce