Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Didn’t think I’d get caught, should I make more videos like this? #caught #public #outdoor #exhibitionist #nude #naked #dickflash #thickcock #bigdick #bbc #bwc #socal #horny #straight #trending #nsfwtwtًً #feet #veiny #abs #striptease #fit #fitmen #menwithonlyfans

RemiDzzz's profile picture

Remi

14,717 subscribers

31,258 views • 9 days ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#caught#public#outdoor#exhibitionist#nude#naked#dickflash#thickcock#bigdick#bbc#bwc#socal#horny#straight#trending#nsfwtwtًً#feet#veiny#abs#striptease#fit#fitmen#menwithonlyfans
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Michael Powell explains why "A Canterbury Tale" (1944) was a tremendous flop: ‘'A Canterbury Tale' (1944) was really Emeric Pressburger’s film. I’m a director; I hate writing. With 'A Canterbury Tale', I had doubts, because the script had a wonderful idea—this man who cares so much about truth and beauty that he has to act for it, even on pain of being regarded as some sort of lunatic for what he does—but it was a Continental idea that did not fit into an English film. If I was going to make an English film with it at all, I should have done more with it, translated it more. But I didn’t. I filmed it straight and the result was a tremendous flop. Since then I’ve never filmed anything I had reservations about, as I’m not conceited enough to think I’m so good I can get away with anything I’m not absolutely sure of." (Michael Powell's interview to The Times, 1960) P.S: On this day, 82 years ago, 'A Canterbury Tale' (1944) premiered in Canterbury, UK.
1:16

Michael Powell explains why "A Canterbury Tale" (1944) was a tremendous flop: ‘'A Canterbury Tale' (1944) was really Emeric Pressburger’s film. I’m a director; I hate writing. With 'A Canterbury Tale', I had doubts, because the script had a wonderful idea—this man who cares so much about truth and beauty that he has to act for it, even on pain of being regarded as some sort of lunatic for what he does—but it was a Continental idea that did not fit into an English film. If I was going to make an English film with it at all, I should have done more with it, translated it more. But I didn’t. I filmed it straight and the result was a tremendous flop. Since then I’ve never filmed anything I had reservations about, as I’m not conceited enough to think I’m so good I can get away with anything I’m not absolutely sure of." (Michael Powell's interview to The Times, 1960) P.S: On this day, 82 years ago, 'A Canterbury Tale' (1944) premiered in Canterbury, UK.

DepressedBergman

49,305 views • 4 months ago

Yesterday at ETH Latam, I was at a Q&A session with vitalik.eth Someone asked what kind of users he’s most excited to see using Ethereum’s new privacy features. His answer wasn’t what you’d expect, and it really caught my attention as a designer. He said: “Honestly, just normal people.” As a designer, I love that. Privacy, just like design, shouldn’t feel like a premium feature. It should be part of the infrastructure, intuitive and invisible. He compared it to the shift from HTTP to HTTPS. You didn’t have to change your behavior to get more security. The tech evolved, but the experience stayed simple. UX is also about what you don’t have to think about. The best design raises the baseline for everyone. That’s what Vitalik was really saying. Shoutout to Romina 🇦🇷 | MuShanghai 🇨🇳✈️ for making this moment possible!
1:07

Yesterday at ETH Latam, I was at a Q&A session with vitalik.eth Someone asked what kind of users he’s most excited to see using Ethereum’s new privacy features. His answer wasn’t what you’d expect, and it really caught my attention as a designer. He said: “Honestly, just normal people.” As a designer, I love that. Privacy, just like design, shouldn’t feel like a premium feature. It should be part of the infrastructure, intuitive and invisible. He compared it to the shift from HTTP to HTTPS. You didn’t have to change your behavior to get more security. The tech evolved, but the experience stayed simple. UX is also about what you don’t have to think about. The best design raises the baseline for everyone. That’s what Vitalik was really saying. Shoutout to Romina 🇦🇷 | MuShanghai 🇨🇳✈️ for making this moment possible!

Ceci

59,202 views • 10 months ago

This is a challenge to Libs of TikTok and Chaya Raichik to debate me under whatever terms she sees fit on a Twitter Space. She can choose ALL the speakers: As a backstory, I called Raichik out 3 days ago because LibsofTiktok continued to tweet out a naked video of men riding bikes in Seattle to potentially be seen by thousands of kids who followed their account. Yes, 30 million children per month use Twitter. Thousands of these children follow Libsoftiktok. Millions of people saw the uncensored naked video. I then specifically spoke out against kids attending the event. I called it disgusting and repeatedly said that children should not be at these events. Raichik, who had been sharing the video of the event to kids on Twitter, then decided to try and get me back, by taking a reply I made to somebody, after I had already on multiple occasions clearly spoke out against kids attending this event and being exposed to these men. The tweet read: "Brian Krassenstein defends adult men riding around naked and flashing their dicks to kids. Yikes." Once again this is actually what I said in the conversation thread: "I think this is disgusting and certainly should be illegal" Let me make this 100% clear: I unequivocally do NOT support parents taking children to nude events like the one in Seattle last week. I unequivocally do NOT support the sharing of nude videos of men flashing their genitals on Twitter where 30 million kids potentially have access to it. I never said otherwise despite Raichik's claims. Raichik, however, 100% supports sharing naked videos of mens' genitals on Twitter, where thousands of children potentially have access to them, or she is ignorant to the fact that thousands of kids follow her account. So once again, I challenge Raichik to a Twitter Space debate. A respectful debate where we can discuss these issues and our thoughts on them away from all the clickbait lies. I would assume that if she thinks she is honest in all of this she would jump at the opportunity to set the record straight. Who agrees?
2:55

This is a challenge to Libs of TikTok and Chaya Raichik to debate me under whatever terms she sees fit on a Twitter Space. She can choose ALL the speakers: As a backstory, I called Raichik out 3 days ago because LibsofTiktok continued to tweet out a naked video of men riding bikes in Seattle to potentially be seen by thousands of kids who followed their account. Yes, 30 million children per month use Twitter. Thousands of these children follow Libsoftiktok. Millions of people saw the uncensored naked video. I then specifically spoke out against kids attending the event. I called it disgusting and repeatedly said that children should not be at these events. Raichik, who had been sharing the video of the event to kids on Twitter, then decided to try and get me back, by taking a reply I made to somebody, after I had already on multiple occasions clearly spoke out against kids attending this event and being exposed to these men. The tweet read: "Brian Krassenstein defends adult men riding around naked and flashing their dicks to kids. Yikes." Once again this is actually what I said in the conversation thread: "I think this is disgusting and certainly should be illegal" Let me make this 100% clear: I unequivocally do NOT support parents taking children to nude events like the one in Seattle last week. I unequivocally do NOT support the sharing of nude videos of men flashing their genitals on Twitter where 30 million kids potentially have access to it. I never said otherwise despite Raichik's claims. Raichik, however, 100% supports sharing naked videos of mens' genitals on Twitter, where thousands of children potentially have access to them, or she is ignorant to the fact that thousands of kids follow her account. So once again, I challenge Raichik to a Twitter Space debate. A respectful debate where we can discuss these issues and our thoughts on them away from all the clickbait lies. I would assume that if she thinks she is honest in all of this she would jump at the opportunity to set the record straight. Who agrees?

Brian Krassenstein

926,582 views • 3 years ago

I would only blame myself if someone kept taking food off of my plate and eating it. It’s because I didn’t set clear boundaries at all. To be honest I couldn’t even be mad about this because it would be my fault this even happened. But you know very well I’m going to learn my lesson. She obviously is very comfortable doing this, he doesn’t seem to be firm about not letting her do it, the only one he can be mad at is himself. I think he will think twice about continuing to let her get away with it. Years ago, my brother used to do this to me and when I confronted him he laughed but he never stopped doing it, it got old really quick, I was annoyed because it felt like a bullying tactic. It got to the point one day that i had had enough, I made my plate and I dumped a bunch of salt into it knowing he was going to try to eat my food. After one bite he spit it out and he learned his lesson. He never did it again. But he still got mad I did it. Personally I think he was more mad he got caught if anything. I think a simple solution is to double order, that way if someone eats all my food I still have a back up, that could work right? But a part of me feels like that shouldn’t even be necessary. What would you do if someone kept eating off your plate? Would you put your foot down or just stay silent in hopes they don’t do it again. I think I am going to start just smoking more meat on the grill and keeping that up. I always make so much and if people wanna have some I still have plenty.
0:33

I would only blame myself if someone kept taking food off of my plate and eating it. It’s because I didn’t set clear boundaries at all. To be honest I couldn’t even be mad about this because it would be my fault this even happened. But you know very well I’m going to learn my lesson. She obviously is very comfortable doing this, he doesn’t seem to be firm about not letting her do it, the only one he can be mad at is himself. I think he will think twice about continuing to let her get away with it. Years ago, my brother used to do this to me and when I confronted him he laughed but he never stopped doing it, it got old really quick, I was annoyed because it felt like a bullying tactic. It got to the point one day that i had had enough, I made my plate and I dumped a bunch of salt into it knowing he was going to try to eat my food. After one bite he spit it out and he learned his lesson. He never did it again. But he still got mad I did it. Personally I think he was more mad he got caught if anything. I think a simple solution is to double order, that way if someone eats all my food I still have a back up, that could work right? But a part of me feels like that shouldn’t even be necessary. What would you do if someone kept eating off your plate? Would you put your foot down or just stay silent in hopes they don’t do it again. I think I am going to start just smoking more meat on the grill and keeping that up. I always make so much and if people wanna have some I still have plenty.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

49,661 views • 3 months ago

👉 Posting this feels incredibly vulnerable as I tend not to share many personal things online. But I also know that 1 in 2 people will develop cancer at some point in their lifetime and, of those, 1 in 5 will delay for more than three months before contacting a doctor about symptoms. I nearly became one of those people. Like most others with a busy family and work life, I was tempted to wait until I had more time and headspace before seeing a doctor. I was six weeks away from finishing my new book and I didn't know if I had the capacity to deal with both. Since the diagnosis, I am so grateful that I didn’t delay for long. Speed is our secret weapon when it comes to cancer. The sooner we know it’s there, the better our chances of a good outcome. So, for anyone out there who has noticed something and not yet called their doctor, this is your sign to make it happen. I hope this explains my lack of dm replies and videos being posted over the last few months. Its been a rollercoaster. I’m going to share some of my journey on stories for anyone who wants updates. I am incredibly lucky that this has been caught so early. Of course, nothing is certain just yet but a couple of surgeries and I should be out the other side. That is another reason I am stepping outside of my comfort zone to talk about this. Many people go through this and go on to live full, active and healthy lives. So discovering possible symptoms doesn’t have to be a disaster. It can be an opportunity to get ahead in the fight and beat cancer before it has a chance to take over. I absolutely have my head in the game for the treatment plan ahead, ready to get going next week. I also have a giant stack of video ideas just waiting to be made, so I can’t wait to get back up and running ❤️ If you think it could help someone feel free to share this message ❤️
1:05

👉 Posting this feels incredibly vulnerable as I tend not to share many personal things online. But I also know that 1 in 2 people will develop cancer at some point in their lifetime and, of those, 1 in 5 will delay for more than three months before contacting a doctor about symptoms. I nearly became one of those people. Like most others with a busy family and work life, I was tempted to wait until I had more time and headspace before seeing a doctor. I was six weeks away from finishing my new book and I didn't know if I had the capacity to deal with both. Since the diagnosis, I am so grateful that I didn’t delay for long. Speed is our secret weapon when it comes to cancer. The sooner we know it’s there, the better our chances of a good outcome. So, for anyone out there who has noticed something and not yet called their doctor, this is your sign to make it happen. I hope this explains my lack of dm replies and videos being posted over the last few months. Its been a rollercoaster. I’m going to share some of my journey on stories for anyone who wants updates. I am incredibly lucky that this has been caught so early. Of course, nothing is certain just yet but a couple of surgeries and I should be out the other side. That is another reason I am stepping outside of my comfort zone to talk about this. Many people go through this and go on to live full, active and healthy lives. So discovering possible symptoms doesn’t have to be a disaster. It can be an opportunity to get ahead in the fight and beat cancer before it has a chance to take over. I absolutely have my head in the game for the treatment plan ahead, ready to get going next week. I also have a giant stack of video ideas just waiting to be made, so I can’t wait to get back up and running ❤️ If you think it could help someone feel free to share this message ❤️

Dr Julie Smith

27,281 views • 2 years ago

SYH Tiktok Live 260714 2 (App translation only; may contain inaccuracies) 🍒: “Then on the way back… somehow Junhoe and I ended up sharing the same taxi. There were too many people, so it ended up being just the two of us. That’s when Junhoe said, “Hyung… I’m really sorry about everything.” Then he said, “I’ll be cheering for you after you leave.” So I told him, “Junhoe, make sure you treat the older members well… and I hope you debut.” Then the next day came. The members went to their vocal lesson. I was going to tell the co. I was leaving. I’d already packed all my things. Before meeting the team manager from the Training & Development Team, I had already imagined every question he might ask. I’d even prepared all my answers in advance. He came in and said, “Yunhyeong, what’s going on?” I replied, “Honestly… this has been really hard for me. I don’t think trainee life suits me. I think regular school life suits me better.” I honestly expected him to say something like, “I understand, Yunhyeong. I’m sorry it’s been so hard. Study hard, and thank you for all your effort.” That’s the response I had prepared myself for. Instead he said, “Well, of course school is easier! You get to sleep, you don’t have to practice. Of course school life is easier!” Then he asked, “If you were struggling, why didn’t you tell me? Why did you keep it all to yourself? We could’ve adjusted things for you. You seemed to be doing well, so I thought you’d adapted.” I was so caught off guard that all I could say was, “But… I’ve already packed my bags…” And he just said, “Go unpack them.” I was like, “Huh?” Then he said, “Yunhyeong, we’ll adjust things for you. Give it another try. This is such a great opportunity.” So I said, “Thank you.” I unpacked everything.” +
4:29

SYH Tiktok Live 260714 2 (App translation only; may contain inaccuracies) 🍒: “Then on the way back… somehow Junhoe and I ended up sharing the same taxi. There were too many people, so it ended up being just the two of us. That’s when Junhoe said, “Hyung… I’m really sorry about everything.” Then he said, “I’ll be cheering for you after you leave.” So I told him, “Junhoe, make sure you treat the older members well… and I hope you debut.” Then the next day came. The members went to their vocal lesson. I was going to tell the co. I was leaving. I’d already packed all my things. Before meeting the team manager from the Training & Development Team, I had already imagined every question he might ask. I’d even prepared all my answers in advance. He came in and said, “Yunhyeong, what’s going on?” I replied, “Honestly… this has been really hard for me. I don’t think trainee life suits me. I think regular school life suits me better.” I honestly expected him to say something like, “I understand, Yunhyeong. I’m sorry it’s been so hard. Study hard, and thank you for all your effort.” That’s the response I had prepared myself for. Instead he said, “Well, of course school is easier! You get to sleep, you don’t have to practice. Of course school life is easier!” Then he asked, “If you were struggling, why didn’t you tell me? Why did you keep it all to yourself? We could’ve adjusted things for you. You seemed to be doing well, so I thought you’d adapted.” I was so caught off guard that all I could say was, “But… I’ve already packed my bags…” And he just said, “Go unpack them.” I was like, “Huh?” Then he said, “Yunhyeong, we’ll adjust things for you. Give it another try. This is such a great opportunity.” So I said, “Thank you.” I unpacked everything.” +

𝑳𝒂.

70,953 views • 2 months ago

People love a clean success story. Real life is messier. I worried that readers of "Troubled" would take away a simple story: this kid was dealt a bad hand, worked hard, and overcame his circumstances—so why can’t everyone else do the same? But that wasn't the point. I shared the stories of my friends I grew up with to make clear that my outcome is not typical. It’s not what you should expect for kids in those circumstances. Two of my friends went to prison. One was shot and killed. Others didn’t have outcomes that extreme, but none went to college. If you put a kid in that environment, most will end up more like my friends than like me. That matters, because we should be thinking about how to help those people too—the ones who aren’t interested in, or suited for, the conventional college track. Many people who set policy are nerds who did well in school. They assume their path—study hard, get a degree, enter the middle class—is the one everyone should follow. But there should be other ways to build a fulfilling life that don’t require debt and college. I’m still friends with some of the guys I grew up with, and I’m not convinced that even with every advantage—stable families, private schools, money—they would have taken to academics. They didn’t like classroom learning or homework. I was the only one who read for pleasure, the only one who read the textbooks—and even I graduated high school with a 2.2 GPA. I was the most academically inclined among my friends. So I think about the young guy who isn’t drawn to academics. There should still be a path for him to live a good life and feel proud of what he’s done. But those paths have been narrowed for people who don’t fit that academic mold.
2:13

People love a clean success story. Real life is messier. I worried that readers of "Troubled" would take away a simple story: this kid was dealt a bad hand, worked hard, and overcame his circumstances—so why can’t everyone else do the same? But that wasn't the point. I shared the stories of my friends I grew up with to make clear that my outcome is not typical. It’s not what you should expect for kids in those circumstances. Two of my friends went to prison. One was shot and killed. Others didn’t have outcomes that extreme, but none went to college. If you put a kid in that environment, most will end up more like my friends than like me. That matters, because we should be thinking about how to help those people too—the ones who aren’t interested in, or suited for, the conventional college track. Many people who set policy are nerds who did well in school. They assume their path—study hard, get a degree, enter the middle class—is the one everyone should follow. But there should be other ways to build a fulfilling life that don’t require debt and college. I’m still friends with some of the guys I grew up with, and I’m not convinced that even with every advantage—stable families, private schools, money—they would have taken to academics. They didn’t like classroom learning or homework. I was the only one who read for pleasure, the only one who read the textbooks—and even I graduated high school with a 2.2 GPA. I was the most academically inclined among my friends. So I think about the young guy who isn’t drawn to academics. There should still be a path for him to live a good life and feel proud of what he’s done. But those paths have been narrowed for people who don’t fit that academic mold.

Rob Henderson

14,210 views • 5 months ago

Why Aren’t More People Talking About This? 200 Child Traffickers Arrested In Ohio Including The Co-Founder Of Breakthrough Public Schools If Public School “Leaders” & “Founders” Are Being Caught And Arrested Here, This Type Of Behavior Is Probably Happening All Over America’s Public Education System The schools responded by saying they didn’t “believe he had inappropriate contact with any students.”… yeah right “School leader has resigned while facing charges for engaging in prostitution following a human trafficking sting. He was one of nearly 200 arrested last week and parents in the school system are now sharing their concern. — They called it Operation Buyers Remorse, a statewide human trafficking crackdown last week. Arresting Johns for trying to buy sex. — Among the 160 arrested was 68-year-old John Zitzner, the co-founder and now former board president of Breakthrough Public Schools, a network of public charter schools in Cleveland. Court documents show he was arrested on Thursday in Westlake, charged with engaging in prostitution. He gave his resignation on Friday. It's very disheartening to hear and I think he should get what he deserves. Hodges McLean has two kids at the breakthrough public schools, Glenville campus. He says he will talk to his kids about this, but hopes it doesn't impact the school, its reputation or the quality of learning. I think these breakthrough schools do provide a value for the community and for kids around here. And I think the schools should continue to keep doing what they're doing. Police, you're under arrest. Hands on your head. Ohio Attorney General Dave Yo says this crackdown was about targeting the demand for human trafficking, sending a message that if you buy sex in Ohio, you will get caught. Officers interviewed 104 human trafficking survivors during the sting, connecting them to health care and social services. Local law enforcement in Willoughby and Summit County, sharing how prevalent the problem is right here at home. Unfortunately, we've seen a big increase because we border two major freeways. We have a lot of commercial business, hotel business in our city, and it's just, it's an opportunity available to these criminals, but we want to shut it down immediately. And I believe that we've got to address the Johns, because if you don't address them, if you don't hold them accountable, then the crime continues to perpetuate. We reached out to the school for comment and the friends of Breakthrough Schools board chair Jeff Berlin says in part that the board is separate from the school so Zitzner's resignation doesn't impact staff or students saying he only visited schools occasionally so there's no reason to believe he had inappropriate contact with any students.”
2:35

Why Aren’t More People Talking About This? 200 Child Traffickers Arrested In Ohio Including The Co-Founder Of Breakthrough Public Schools If Public School “Leaders” & “Founders” Are Being Caught And Arrested Here, This Type Of Behavior Is Probably Happening All Over America’s Public Education System The schools responded by saying they didn’t “believe he had inappropriate contact with any students.”… yeah right “School leader has resigned while facing charges for engaging in prostitution following a human trafficking sting. He was one of nearly 200 arrested last week and parents in the school system are now sharing their concern. — They called it Operation Buyers Remorse, a statewide human trafficking crackdown last week. Arresting Johns for trying to buy sex. — Among the 160 arrested was 68-year-old John Zitzner, the co-founder and now former board president of Breakthrough Public Schools, a network of public charter schools in Cleveland. Court documents show he was arrested on Thursday in Westlake, charged with engaging in prostitution. He gave his resignation on Friday. It's very disheartening to hear and I think he should get what he deserves. Hodges McLean has two kids at the breakthrough public schools, Glenville campus. He says he will talk to his kids about this, but hopes it doesn't impact the school, its reputation or the quality of learning. I think these breakthrough schools do provide a value for the community and for kids around here. And I think the schools should continue to keep doing what they're doing. Police, you're under arrest. Hands on your head. Ohio Attorney General Dave Yo says this crackdown was about targeting the demand for human trafficking, sending a message that if you buy sex in Ohio, you will get caught. Officers interviewed 104 human trafficking survivors during the sting, connecting them to health care and social services. Local law enforcement in Willoughby and Summit County, sharing how prevalent the problem is right here at home. Unfortunately, we've seen a big increase because we border two major freeways. We have a lot of commercial business, hotel business in our city, and it's just, it's an opportunity available to these criminals, but we want to shut it down immediately. And I believe that we've got to address the Johns, because if you don't address them, if you don't hold them accountable, then the crime continues to perpetuate. We reached out to the school for comment and the friends of Breakthrough Schools board chair Jeff Berlin says in part that the board is separate from the school so Zitzner's resignation doesn't impact staff or students saying he only visited schools occasionally so there's no reason to believe he had inappropriate contact with any students.”

Wall Street Apes

543,145 views • 2 years ago

Hello everyone, hello. It’s raining a lot outside, right? Yes, I hope everyone’s being careful not to get caught in the rain. As for food… I’m planning to eat a little later. Yeah, I’ll eat later. Last night, I… I really thought a lot. I kept thinking and thinking, and after all that, I felt like - for the people I love, I should at least speak honestly. Rather than just pretending nothing happened and letting it pass, I wanted to say this properly. Because when I’ve done something wrong, I want to say I’m sorry. I believe the closer the relationship, the more careful you have to be. And yesterday - honestly, it was such a good day, right? It was such a good day… it was our Jongho’s birthday. We each congratulated him personally, but, if I’m honest, I don’t think I thought deeply enough about it. I don’t think I did, and there’s really no excuse for that. Because all of you love ATEEZ and love Jongho, and I should have been more thoughtful, more detailed. So I really wanted to sincerely apologize for that part. Even though Jongho and I are close, that’s beside the point. The closer you are to someone, the more you should be considerate. But because I thought, “Ah, we’re close,” I just lightly said, “Oh, his birthday passed already,” in a joking way… and I’ve been thinking about that. I think my wording yesterday was quite strong. You don’t have to unconditionally hold me or comfort me. Really, it’s okay. I’m really okay. I mean it. But still… when I think that my words might have hurt you, it doesn’t matter how I am. It just keeps coming to mind, over and over. Honestly… it’s true that my wording was strong. I think I was too excited, too comfortable - maybe I got carried away. The words themselves came out too harsh, and I regret that. And I want to be clear - I never, ever meant something like “mokie jolida/being/to choked” toward you guys. It was just something I said lightly, the kind of thing friends might say to each other. But still… when I thought about it later, just the fact that you had to hear those words made my heart feel uneasy. All through last night, I kept thinking, “Maybe… maybe I shouldn’t have said something like that.” Words with that kind of negative tone - I really shouldn’t say them. I wasn’t thinking clearly. And, because my family is really, really close - my mom and dad are both very warm (hearted) people, and my noona/older sister sometimes calls me “oppa” in a cute, teasing way. But I guess I got too carried away and just said it without thinking… Still, one thing I can say for sure - and I’m not just saying this - in our family, my noona/sister is my noona/sister. Truly. Even though I said it jokingly, now I realize that it was inappropriate, so I’ll be more careful from now on. The reason I wanted to talk to you like this is because, even if it’s just a small thing, when I do something wrong, I want to say it right away. I really want to. And if I do something wrong, I want you to tell me. Because I’m ignorant about some things. There are many things I still don’t know. So sometimes I make mistakes. I hope you can tell me comfortably. I kept thinking about when I should do this live - I thought, in the morning some people have work, some people are busy - and after thinking about it, I decided to come now, because I really wanted to tell you this. Of course, everyone feels things differently. Depending on how someone interprets it, it can feel different. But at least for me - if I look back objectively and realize that what I did wasn’t right, I want to admit it. I was the one at fault, so I should admit it. What use is pride in front of you all, really? When I think about it calmly - if I did wrong, then that’s wrong, no excuses. That’s why I wanted to speak openly about it.
21:51

Hello everyone, hello. It’s raining a lot outside, right? Yes, I hope everyone’s being careful not to get caught in the rain. As for food… I’m planning to eat a little later. Yeah, I’ll eat later. Last night, I… I really thought a lot. I kept thinking and thinking, and after all that, I felt like - for the people I love, I should at least speak honestly. Rather than just pretending nothing happened and letting it pass, I wanted to say this properly. Because when I’ve done something wrong, I want to say I’m sorry. I believe the closer the relationship, the more careful you have to be. And yesterday - honestly, it was such a good day, right? It was such a good day… it was our Jongho’s birthday. We each congratulated him personally, but, if I’m honest, I don’t think I thought deeply enough about it. I don’t think I did, and there’s really no excuse for that. Because all of you love ATEEZ and love Jongho, and I should have been more thoughtful, more detailed. So I really wanted to sincerely apologize for that part. Even though Jongho and I are close, that’s beside the point. The closer you are to someone, the more you should be considerate. But because I thought, “Ah, we’re close,” I just lightly said, “Oh, his birthday passed already,” in a joking way… and I’ve been thinking about that. I think my wording yesterday was quite strong. You don’t have to unconditionally hold me or comfort me. Really, it’s okay. I’m really okay. I mean it. But still… when I think that my words might have hurt you, it doesn’t matter how I am. It just keeps coming to mind, over and over. Honestly… it’s true that my wording was strong. I think I was too excited, too comfortable - maybe I got carried away. The words themselves came out too harsh, and I regret that. And I want to be clear - I never, ever meant something like “mokie jolida/being/to choked” toward you guys. It was just something I said lightly, the kind of thing friends might say to each other. But still… when I thought about it later, just the fact that you had to hear those words made my heart feel uneasy. All through last night, I kept thinking, “Maybe… maybe I shouldn’t have said something like that.” Words with that kind of negative tone - I really shouldn’t say them. I wasn’t thinking clearly. And, because my family is really, really close - my mom and dad are both very warm (hearted) people, and my noona/older sister sometimes calls me “oppa” in a cute, teasing way. But I guess I got too carried away and just said it without thinking… Still, one thing I can say for sure - and I’m not just saying this - in our family, my noona/sister is my noona/sister. Truly. Even though I said it jokingly, now I realize that it was inappropriate, so I’ll be more careful from now on. The reason I wanted to talk to you like this is because, even if it’s just a small thing, when I do something wrong, I want to say it right away. I really want to. And if I do something wrong, I want you to tell me. Because I’m ignorant about some things. There are many things I still don’t know. So sometimes I make mistakes. I hope you can tell me comfortably. I kept thinking about when I should do this live - I thought, in the morning some people have work, some people are busy - and after thinking about it, I decided to come now, because I really wanted to tell you this. Of course, everyone feels things differently. Depending on how someone interprets it, it can feel different. But at least for me - if I look back objectively and realize that what I did wasn’t right, I want to admit it. I was the one at fault, so I should admit it. What use is pride in front of you all, really? When I think about it calmly - if I did wrong, then that’s wrong, no excuses. That’s why I wanted to speak openly about it.

Irene | AhgaTiny

81,561 views • 11 months ago

If Republican lawmakers in Kentucky, West Virginia and Iowa get their way, public schools would be required to show students videos like “Baby Olivia” (seen below). This video, created by the pro-life group Live Action (founded by Lila Rose) depicts an embryo and fetus as it goes through the stages of development before becoming a baby. A lot of people on the left are upset over this. I want to provide my opinion. The law in Kentucky explicitly states that Children would be shown the following: “A high-definition ultrasound video, at least three (3) minutes in duration, showing the development of the brain, heart, sex organs, and other vital organs in early fetal development; and a high-quality, computer-generated rendering or animation showing the process of fertilization and every stage of human development inside the uterus, noting significant markers in cell growth and organ development for every week of pregnancy until birth.” I honestly have no problem with this law, as children and teens should know about the development of an embryo, fetus, and baby. However, I do think that these videos should be 100% factual, and also let children know the size and weight of the embryo/fetus along the way. Additionally they should teach about when a fetus develops the ability to be conscious of their life, and the ability to feel pain. Let’s give children all of the factual information. The more they know, the better decisions they can make. What are your thoughts?
3:13

If Republican lawmakers in Kentucky, West Virginia and Iowa get their way, public schools would be required to show students videos like “Baby Olivia” (seen below). This video, created by the pro-life group Live Action (founded by Lila Rose) depicts an embryo and fetus as it goes through the stages of development before becoming a baby. A lot of people on the left are upset over this. I want to provide my opinion. The law in Kentucky explicitly states that Children would be shown the following: “A high-definition ultrasound video, at least three (3) minutes in duration, showing the development of the brain, heart, sex organs, and other vital organs in early fetal development; and a high-quality, computer-generated rendering or animation showing the process of fertilization and every stage of human development inside the uterus, noting significant markers in cell growth and organ development for every week of pregnancy until birth.” I honestly have no problem with this law, as children and teens should know about the development of an embryo, fetus, and baby. However, I do think that these videos should be 100% factual, and also let children know the size and weight of the embryo/fetus along the way. Additionally they should teach about when a fetus develops the ability to be conscious of their life, and the ability to feel pain. Let’s give children all of the factual information. The more they know, the better decisions they can make. What are your thoughts?

Ed Krassenstein

412,236 views • 2 years ago

Zack Polanski on renationalising the water companies, “I talk a lot about nationalising the water companies.” “We also need to be clear that, in and of itself, is not a socialist policy.” “It’s a policy that I think is strongly important.” “I think it moves us towards socialism.” “But actually, that should be the first step.” “Ultimately, we need much greater worker control.” “So I’d go further than the question actually.” “I’d say I’m more than just interested.” “I would say this is crucial if we’re going to change society in the ways that I’ve been talking about today.” “We know these changes cannot come from the top down.” “And again, it might sound odd as a political leader to say this, but they’re not going to come from political leadership.” “They’re probably not solely going to come from political parties.” “They’re going to come from workers.” “They’re going to come from workers on boards making their decisions about how things go.” “Now, the reason why I talked about water companies is I want to talk about an odd thing that’s just happened in London, or happened last year.” “So I’ve been talking to Sadiq Khan, the London Mayor, for a while now about nationalising Thames Water, the water company.” “And I am not coming here to slate Sadiq.” “He’s one of the better Labour politicians.” “But we do have disagreements in times and this is one of the more telling.” “He said, “I don’t have the power to do that.”” “He didn’t seem really interested in the conversation.” “At one point he said he wasn’t the leader of a political party and he didn’t have the platform I do.” “I had to remind him that the Mayor of London does have quite a big platform.” “And talking about water nationalisation would not go unignored and might mean Keir Starmer had to talk about it a little bit more.” “Anyway, he wasn’t willing to do that.” “So then I went at a lower stage and I said, “In many water companies across Europe, they have political representatives on the water boards.”” “So even if it’s privately held, there are still people who are democratically elected who are there to make decisions.”” “And he still wasn’t willing to go that far.” “And so we have a huge gap right now between where our political system is, which is they don’t even think there should be democratic governance on privately held water companies, and what are public goods and vital goods for so many people, whether we’re talking about water or indeed food.”” “But that still wouldn’t be enough.” “It’s not just about democratic governance.” “We should have workers and the people who understand those industries in those rooms helping to make those decisions.” “So absolutely, a cooperative model, a worker-led model, I don’t think should be an if.” “It needs to be a when.” “Because we know right now, with all the problems in our society, they are only going to get worse unless we have a much stronger grassroots, community-led approach to everything in society, but particularly the workplace, particularly businesses, to make sure that the people who are producing and the people who are making the work happen are also there, making sure that they’re vitally involved in the decisions, and also they’re being paid properly and treated with dignity and care.”
2:50

Zack Polanski on renationalising the water companies, “I talk a lot about nationalising the water companies.” “We also need to be clear that, in and of itself, is not a socialist policy.” “It’s a policy that I think is strongly important.” “I think it moves us towards socialism.” “But actually, that should be the first step.” “Ultimately, we need much greater worker control.” “So I’d go further than the question actually.” “I’d say I’m more than just interested.” “I would say this is crucial if we’re going to change society in the ways that I’ve been talking about today.” “We know these changes cannot come from the top down.” “And again, it might sound odd as a political leader to say this, but they’re not going to come from political leadership.” “They’re probably not solely going to come from political parties.” “They’re going to come from workers.” “They’re going to come from workers on boards making their decisions about how things go.” “Now, the reason why I talked about water companies is I want to talk about an odd thing that’s just happened in London, or happened last year.” “So I’ve been talking to Sadiq Khan, the London Mayor, for a while now about nationalising Thames Water, the water company.” “And I am not coming here to slate Sadiq.” “He’s one of the better Labour politicians.” “But we do have disagreements in times and this is one of the more telling.” “He said, “I don’t have the power to do that.”” “He didn’t seem really interested in the conversation.” “At one point he said he wasn’t the leader of a political party and he didn’t have the platform I do.” “I had to remind him that the Mayor of London does have quite a big platform.” “And talking about water nationalisation would not go unignored and might mean Keir Starmer had to talk about it a little bit more.” “Anyway, he wasn’t willing to do that.” “So then I went at a lower stage and I said, “In many water companies across Europe, they have political representatives on the water boards.”” “So even if it’s privately held, there are still people who are democratically elected who are there to make decisions.”” “And he still wasn’t willing to go that far.” “And so we have a huge gap right now between where our political system is, which is they don’t even think there should be democratic governance on privately held water companies, and what are public goods and vital goods for so many people, whether we’re talking about water or indeed food.”” “But that still wouldn’t be enough.” “It’s not just about democratic governance.” “We should have workers and the people who understand those industries in those rooms helping to make those decisions.” “So absolutely, a cooperative model, a worker-led model, I don’t think should be an if.” “It needs to be a when.” “Because we know right now, with all the problems in our society, they are only going to get worse unless we have a much stronger grassroots, community-led approach to everything in society, but particularly the workplace, particularly businesses, to make sure that the people who are producing and the people who are making the work happen are also there, making sure that they’re vitally involved in the decisions, and also they’re being paid properly and treated with dignity and care.”

Farrukh

28,171 views • 3 months ago

Right now, Kashawn Aitcheson is dominating juniors the way a top prospect should, but as we all know, the NHL is a whole different animal. The biggest question mark for him is still his skating. He’s improved, but the feet can get a little wide in transition and his mobility will be tested. Gap control, decision making under pressure, and staying disciplined is what separates good junior D from reliable NHLers. When he finally does turn pro, he’s going to take his lumps, high PIMs in juniors have shown that. Pro hockey will force him to channel his snarl without the extra (sometimes boneheaded) penalties. With that said, I wanted to put together a realistic timeline and set tempered expectations for him over the next few seasons. 2026-27: He’s in Hamilton full time. Expect him to log big minutes on the power play, keep producing points at a solid clip (maybe the 30-45 range) and up the physicality that makes fans love him. Defensively, he’ll tighten up with pro coaching, but there will be nights where the game will look too fast and he’s going to get caught. Maybe he’ll get a couple of NHL call ups for injuries, but he’s not forcing his way into the lineup yet. Next season is all about development. 2027-28: I think he could still be splitting time between Hamilton and the #Isles, or he could earn a bottom pair role right away depending on how the blueline shakes out. By the end of this year, I’d expect him to be a regular NHL contributor. 2028-29: My expectation is that he’s now a full time NHLer logging heavy minutes, killing penalties, and giving us roughly 30-40 points, with a ton of hits and blocks. This isn’t a guy who steps in and runs the power play as a rookie, this isn’t Schaefer. No one is. Aitcheson’s path should be a patient one. The Islanders didn’t draft him to rush him, they drafted him to be a long term piece of the future. When it clicks, I think he’s going to be exactly the kind of nasty, productive defenseman we dream of. Just don’t expect it overnight. Development like this rewards patience.
0:23

Right now, Kashawn Aitcheson is dominating juniors the way a top prospect should, but as we all know, the NHL is a whole different animal. The biggest question mark for him is still his skating. He’s improved, but the feet can get a little wide in transition and his mobility will be tested. Gap control, decision making under pressure, and staying disciplined is what separates good junior D from reliable NHLers. When he finally does turn pro, he’s going to take his lumps, high PIMs in juniors have shown that. Pro hockey will force him to channel his snarl without the extra (sometimes boneheaded) penalties. With that said, I wanted to put together a realistic timeline and set tempered expectations for him over the next few seasons. 2026-27: He’s in Hamilton full time. Expect him to log big minutes on the power play, keep producing points at a solid clip (maybe the 30-45 range) and up the physicality that makes fans love him. Defensively, he’ll tighten up with pro coaching, but there will be nights where the game will look too fast and he’s going to get caught. Maybe he’ll get a couple of NHL call ups for injuries, but he’s not forcing his way into the lineup yet. Next season is all about development. 2027-28: I think he could still be splitting time between Hamilton and the #Isles, or he could earn a bottom pair role right away depending on how the blueline shakes out. By the end of this year, I’d expect him to be a regular NHL contributor. 2028-29: My expectation is that he’s now a full time NHLer logging heavy minutes, killing penalties, and giving us roughly 30-40 points, with a ton of hits and blocks. This isn’t a guy who steps in and runs the power play as a rookie, this isn’t Schaefer. No one is. Aitcheson’s path should be a patient one. The Islanders didn’t draft him to rush him, they drafted him to be a long term piece of the future. When it clicks, I think he’s going to be exactly the kind of nasty, productive defenseman we dream of. Just don’t expect it overnight. Development like this rewards patience.

19 consecutive

15,826 views • 4 months ago

Guys, I’m broken. I am sitting here in tears, and I can't hold it anymore. This country breaks people in ways you never think possible. I have looked for words since yesterdat but I couldn't find any until this video. I have just watched Ssegirinya Muhammad crying, asking why anyone would tie him to such grave crimes like murdering people in Masaka — his birthplace — all because of politics. And honestly, I don’t think I have ever been this heartbroken over anything in Ugandan politics. This man gave up his whole life to serve people. From the moment he became an MP, he didn’t start by “dusting himself off” like most of our leaders do. He didn’t focus on buying fancy cars or securing his own comfort. No. He went straight to work for the people who voted him in. He started projects to help the poor, to take care of the sick, to make life a little easier for the struggling families that elected him. He was different. He cared in ways we don’t often see in our leaders. And how did we, as a country, pay him back? We watched as the system came after him. We watched as he was accused of crimes so ridiculous it hurt to even listen. Murder? Really? They accused him of killing his own people in Masaka. And we said nothing. We just looked on as this man’s life was destroyed bit by bit. We saw his health deteriorate in prison, and we kept quiet. We saw him being denied bail even when those closest to him told us he needed urgent medical treatment. We all remember that judge in Masaka who saw him on a Zoom call from prison and still said NO to bail. The Prisons commissioner told us they have the capacity to treat him in prison even when we later learnt that the whole of this country couldn't treat him. I mean, how can someone see another human being suffering like that and still refuse them a chance to get help? No, guys, NO. Ssegirinya is gone. He’s dead. And this wasn’t just nature taking its course. This wasn’t God’s plan. This was us. This was the system. This was our silence. Our looking the other way. We are complicit. We watched the government persecute a man for standing with the people. We watched them destroy him because he cared more about serving than about playing the political game. We let this happen. And now he’s gone. I keep asking myself — is this what politics in this country has come to? Destroying so many people just to stay in power? Locking up anyone who threatens the status quo without any crime? This is not normal my friends, NO. We can’t just move on from this. A man is dead because he chose to serve his people. He gave everything he could to make life better for his people. And in return, he was fought, persecuted, humiliated, and denied basic human decency. We should be ashamed. Ashamed that we let it get to this point. Ashamed that politics in Uganda has become a death sentence for anyone who tries to stand up for the oppressed. And it’s not just Ssegirinya. How many more lives have been lost? How many more are wasting away in prisons right now for simply demanding a better country? Politics should never take us to this point. And to the people who still defend this system — I honestly don’t have words!
2:31

Guys, I’m broken. I am sitting here in tears, and I can't hold it anymore. This country breaks people in ways you never think possible. I have looked for words since yesterdat but I couldn't find any until this video. I have just watched Ssegirinya Muhammad crying, asking why anyone would tie him to such grave crimes like murdering people in Masaka — his birthplace — all because of politics. And honestly, I don’t think I have ever been this heartbroken over anything in Ugandan politics. This man gave up his whole life to serve people. From the moment he became an MP, he didn’t start by “dusting himself off” like most of our leaders do. He didn’t focus on buying fancy cars or securing his own comfort. No. He went straight to work for the people who voted him in. He started projects to help the poor, to take care of the sick, to make life a little easier for the struggling families that elected him. He was different. He cared in ways we don’t often see in our leaders. And how did we, as a country, pay him back? We watched as the system came after him. We watched as he was accused of crimes so ridiculous it hurt to even listen. Murder? Really? They accused him of killing his own people in Masaka. And we said nothing. We just looked on as this man’s life was destroyed bit by bit. We saw his health deteriorate in prison, and we kept quiet. We saw him being denied bail even when those closest to him told us he needed urgent medical treatment. We all remember that judge in Masaka who saw him on a Zoom call from prison and still said NO to bail. The Prisons commissioner told us they have the capacity to treat him in prison even when we later learnt that the whole of this country couldn't treat him. I mean, how can someone see another human being suffering like that and still refuse them a chance to get help? No, guys, NO. Ssegirinya is gone. He’s dead. And this wasn’t just nature taking its course. This wasn’t God’s plan. This was us. This was the system. This was our silence. Our looking the other way. We are complicit. We watched the government persecute a man for standing with the people. We watched them destroy him because he cared more about serving than about playing the political game. We let this happen. And now he’s gone. I keep asking myself — is this what politics in this country has come to? Destroying so many people just to stay in power? Locking up anyone who threatens the status quo without any crime? This is not normal my friends, NO. We can’t just move on from this. A man is dead because he chose to serve his people. He gave everything he could to make life better for his people. And in return, he was fought, persecuted, humiliated, and denied basic human decency. We should be ashamed. Ashamed that we let it get to this point. Ashamed that politics in Uganda has become a death sentence for anyone who tries to stand up for the oppressed. And it’s not just Ssegirinya. How many more lives have been lost? How many more are wasting away in prisons right now for simply demanding a better country? Politics should never take us to this point. And to the people who still defend this system — I honestly don’t have words!

King Melvin

57,023 views • 1 year ago

I have to say that I’m very disappointed by this year’s #vibejam I'm disappointed because the judging process was… weird My game that you can see bellow ranked #94. Way lower than what I was expecting. I put a lot of effort into the game, I wanted to make sure I’d “push the limits on what AI can do”, just like the organizers were pushing to the builders. And in all honesty, I think I delivered that. I got a lot of positive comments about it (appreciate who did) But it was not enough to be even in the top 25. The judging process went like this: > 2 people judged 950 games, selected the top 25 and handed them to other judges Once I knew my game didn’t qualify in the top 25, I reached out to one of the first judges to ask for feedback, trying to understand why my game went so poorly. The response I got was “your game is not fun at all and lack any kind of story. You focused too much on graphics”. I thought it was a bit harsh, but okay. I’m fine with criticism. Then I reached out to a judge (a game dev) that was responsible to rate the top 25 games and asked for feedback as well. The response was completely different, I got “Jesus, this looks awesome! You should’ve be in the top 25” and the rate he gave me would've put me in the top 10 or maybe even top 5! Then I noticed the biggest problem of the jam: > The judges responsible for picking the top 25 has no experience on game development at all, and this completely broke the judging system So all my work focusing on real game development and not AI Slop was pretty much thrown in the trash as this was simply not important for the initial judges All because they just didn’t consider the game fun. Which brings me to another problem: > Fun is subjective I’ve played my game with my wife and we had a blast, and we also played other games that we didn’t find it as much fun. So they decided the results of the game jam that has 50k in prize pool based on their personal experience of fun. I mean, fun is important. But technical depth also should be considered in a game jam. They said that “fun > polish” was the criteria. But this is definitely flawed by the reason above. You can build GTA 6 but if the judge does not like GTA you are discarded. With no regards on the technical complexity of the game whatsoever I’m not here to trash on anyone, I think everyone that shipped a game deserves to be praised. And I think the winners deserved their spot. But the rest was very... questionable. And lots of participants didn’t get the respect they deserved (I've talked to a bunch of them) That’s my take. I'll tag some creators down bellow that should've get more credit
0:53

I have to say that I’m very disappointed by this year’s #vibejam I'm disappointed because the judging process was… weird My game that you can see bellow ranked #94. Way lower than what I was expecting. I put a lot of effort into the game, I wanted to make sure I’d “push the limits on what AI can do”, just like the organizers were pushing to the builders. And in all honesty, I think I delivered that. I got a lot of positive comments about it (appreciate who did) But it was not enough to be even in the top 25. The judging process went like this: > 2 people judged 950 games, selected the top 25 and handed them to other judges Once I knew my game didn’t qualify in the top 25, I reached out to one of the first judges to ask for feedback, trying to understand why my game went so poorly. The response I got was “your game is not fun at all and lack any kind of story. You focused too much on graphics”. I thought it was a bit harsh, but okay. I’m fine with criticism. Then I reached out to a judge (a game dev) that was responsible to rate the top 25 games and asked for feedback as well. The response was completely different, I got “Jesus, this looks awesome! You should’ve be in the top 25” and the rate he gave me would've put me in the top 10 or maybe even top 5! Then I noticed the biggest problem of the jam: > The judges responsible for picking the top 25 has no experience on game development at all, and this completely broke the judging system So all my work focusing on real game development and not AI Slop was pretty much thrown in the trash as this was simply not important for the initial judges All because they just didn’t consider the game fun. Which brings me to another problem: > Fun is subjective I’ve played my game with my wife and we had a blast, and we also played other games that we didn’t find it as much fun. So they decided the results of the game jam that has 50k in prize pool based on their personal experience of fun. I mean, fun is important. But technical depth also should be considered in a game jam. They said that “fun > polish” was the criteria. But this is definitely flawed by the reason above. You can build GTA 6 but if the judge does not like GTA you are discarded. With no regards on the technical complexity of the game whatsoever I’m not here to trash on anyone, I think everyone that shipped a game deserves to be praised. And I think the winners deserved their spot. But the rest was very... questionable. And lots of participants didn’t get the respect they deserved (I've talked to a bunch of them) That’s my take. I'll tag some creators down bellow that should've get more credit

André → andreelias.dev

74,386 views • 3 months ago

We’ve shared a wide range of testimonies on this show, and they’re some of my favorite episodes to do. They encourage me, and I know you guys love them too. I’m so thankful we get to tell these stories. But whenever we share a testimony like this: One of a woman who came out of that kind of lifestyle and was saved, we get a lot of chatter and criticism. I just think it’s odd that there are people who profess to follow Jesus, who had very intentional interactions with women caught in sexual sin—like the woman caught in adultery who was almost stoned, the woman He met at the well who had been married five times, and the woman who poured out her finest oil and perfume on His feet, whom Jesus praised for her faith. These people claim to follow that same Jesus, yet have such utter disdain for the women He clearly showed attended to in Scripture. Jesus praised these women for their faith when they repented, which is something we should do. Clearly, the Gospel writers, inspired by the Holy Spirit to write these inerrant, infallible words, saw fit to include these interactions with Jesus and these formerly promiscuous women. That tells us something about the importance of this kind of testimony, not only highlighting it, but also recognizing the mercy our Lord and Savior shows these women, which we should emulate in our own lives. If you walk away from a testimony thinking, “Wow, they’re really trying to make it seem like that sin isn’t a big deal. They’re trying to make people feel better about sexual immorality or promiscuity,” then you’ve completely missed it. You are the older brother in the prodigal son story. You’re missing the Gospel. You’re missing Jesus. No one on this show is making light of sin, especially not sexual sin. It damages your heart, your mind, your body, and it can have lasting consequences even after repentance. If anything, our goal is the opposite: To reach women in those situations and urge them to stop before they sell their bodies, before they’re treated like objects, before they fall deeper into promiscuity. To say, this will lead you to darkness. This is going to hurt you. You’re looking for love in all the wrong places. There’s a better way. Because you will find love, fulfillment, and identity in Christ. And for those who have walked that path, the message is this: you are not too far gone. God’s grace reaches further than your past. He can cleanse you. He can restore you. He makes you new. That is what His sacrifice does by grace, through faith. And if you don’t believe that, if you think there’s a kind of sin Christ can’t fully forgive, then you’ve missed the heart of the Gospel altogether.
3:34

We’ve shared a wide range of testimonies on this show, and they’re some of my favorite episodes to do. They encourage me, and I know you guys love them too. I’m so thankful we get to tell these stories. But whenever we share a testimony like this: One of a woman who came out of that kind of lifestyle and was saved, we get a lot of chatter and criticism. I just think it’s odd that there are people who profess to follow Jesus, who had very intentional interactions with women caught in sexual sin—like the woman caught in adultery who was almost stoned, the woman He met at the well who had been married five times, and the woman who poured out her finest oil and perfume on His feet, whom Jesus praised for her faith. These people claim to follow that same Jesus, yet have such utter disdain for the women He clearly showed attended to in Scripture. Jesus praised these women for their faith when they repented, which is something we should do. Clearly, the Gospel writers, inspired by the Holy Spirit to write these inerrant, infallible words, saw fit to include these interactions with Jesus and these formerly promiscuous women. That tells us something about the importance of this kind of testimony, not only highlighting it, but also recognizing the mercy our Lord and Savior shows these women, which we should emulate in our own lives. If you walk away from a testimony thinking, “Wow, they’re really trying to make it seem like that sin isn’t a big deal. They’re trying to make people feel better about sexual immorality or promiscuity,” then you’ve completely missed it. You are the older brother in the prodigal son story. You’re missing the Gospel. You’re missing Jesus. No one on this show is making light of sin, especially not sexual sin. It damages your heart, your mind, your body, and it can have lasting consequences even after repentance. If anything, our goal is the opposite: To reach women in those situations and urge them to stop before they sell their bodies, before they’re treated like objects, before they fall deeper into promiscuity. To say, this will lead you to darkness. This is going to hurt you. You’re looking for love in all the wrong places. There’s a better way. Because you will find love, fulfillment, and identity in Christ. And for those who have walked that path, the message is this: you are not too far gone. God’s grace reaches further than your past. He can cleanse you. He can restore you. He makes you new. That is what His sacrifice does by grace, through faith. And if you don’t believe that, if you think there’s a kind of sin Christ can’t fully forgive, then you’ve missed the heart of the Gospel altogether.

Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey

12,188 views • 5 months ago

I'm starting to get a little excited about this... "Everyone in the room gasped. Even the staffers just gasped when they saw that video. There's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that." ~Burlison 🛸 Disclosure Soon? Plus: Burlison Complained to the White House About Not Getting Recognition. Does He Have a Point? 🛸 (I appreciate the honesty from Rep. Eric Burlison but I still have some questions and comments, which are in ( ) ). Burlison: "I know that there's more to come because the White House called me and said, 'Hey, can you talk nice about this release of videos?' And I said, 'I don't even know what's in it. You guys have not engaged with us, at all.'" (Whomever is in charge of communicating with Congress on this issue needs to step up their game. I mean, Burlison has been one of the most vocal Reps. and they're not giving him a heads up on such an important, initial release? That's political, and common-sense, malpractice.) Burlison: "And I'm probably spilling the tea here a little bit, but... And they said, 'You're right, and we're now at a point where we need you, because we don't really...you've kind of done the recon on this, we don't really know where to go...take the investigation from here. Like, we kind of know where to ask and we have videos that we're still declassifying, we have content that we're still declassifying. But as far as like, where to take the investigation, who do you think we should talk to?' "And I'm like, 'You're really asking me? Of all... You're asking me who to go talk to? So I gave them a (audio cut out so I'll try my best) list of people that I've always wanted (to talk to) but they never really talked to me because they're all protected under their non-disclosure agreements and, you know, all of that kind of stuff." (If the White House wants any of those folks to talk to them, involve Trump, and/or Vance and Hegseth. That may convince them to risk it and start talking. And members of Congress need to do whatever they can to get protection, amnesty and anything else whistleblowers need to feel comfortable enough to come forward. Make it happen!) Burlison: "And so, I said, 'But I wanna...I wanna be, you gotta bring me in because I've been doing all of this work with no recognition, and so, if now, things are going to start getting real and real disclosure is gonna happen, I deserve to be a part of this.' And so, that's kind of where things are." (People may get on Burlison's case for being worried about recognition but can you blame him? He should be getting lots of praise, directly from Trump, IN PUBLIC (which will help his re-election efforts), and be given as much information as Rubio has in the National-Security-Advisor position. Maybe make Burlison and Grusch the co-UAP Czars?) Burlison: "And last night, we had about an hour and a half briefing with AARO, where we saw about 30 UAP videos. Some of them are incredible." (This is really encouraging but, as always, I wanna see some of these videos with my own eyes and see if any of them get the masses and media talking about this 24/7. That's when we'll know we're getting closer to more and more disclosure. But what about Disclosure, capital D? Meaning, will we learn about any alleged crashes, bodies, craft or analysis about intent and origin? I don't know.) Burlison: "And I'll describe the two of [the videos I saw]. One of them is of an object that is flying at a very aggressive speed, I don't know how fast. And then suddenly just instantaneously goes from whatever speed is flying... And my guess is it's flying with the wind, probably 80 miles an hour in the atmosphere, and then suddenly just goes like, Mach speed. I mean, it just instantly takes off." (Mach 1 = 767 mph. Again, we need to see this video to figure out if it's actually going as fast as Burlison claims. And if it's released, it would be nice to have data from more than one sensor.) Burlison: "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off. (This gives me hope that future videos will contain better footage. Just how much better? Stay tuned, I guess. I've heard things hyped privately in the past and they usually fall flat and don't get the attention of the masses when made public.) Burlison: "The other video was one of a submarine, I think it's a Russian sub that we're filming. And there are about three objects that are buzzing around this Russian sub that the camera operator - who's supposed to be watching the Russian sub - suddenly starts realizing, I've gotta be watching these objects." Kim St. Onge: "I love how passionate you are about UFOs, by the way, which is why we trust you with all our UFO updates." (They then proceeded to cut off his UFO talk and changed the subject. SMDFH!!! Hope we get to see lots more videos!)
3:25

I'm starting to get a little excited about this... "Everyone in the room gasped. Even the staffers just gasped when they saw that video. There's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that." ~Burlison 🛸 Disclosure Soon? Plus: Burlison Complained to the White House About Not Getting Recognition. Does He Have a Point? 🛸 (I appreciate the honesty from Rep. Eric Burlison but I still have some questions and comments, which are in ( ) ). Burlison: "I know that there's more to come because the White House called me and said, 'Hey, can you talk nice about this release of videos?' And I said, 'I don't even know what's in it. You guys have not engaged with us, at all.'" (Whomever is in charge of communicating with Congress on this issue needs to step up their game. I mean, Burlison has been one of the most vocal Reps. and they're not giving him a heads up on such an important, initial release? That's political, and common-sense, malpractice.) Burlison: "And I'm probably spilling the tea here a little bit, but... And they said, 'You're right, and we're now at a point where we need you, because we don't really...you've kind of done the recon on this, we don't really know where to go...take the investigation from here. Like, we kind of know where to ask and we have videos that we're still declassifying, we have content that we're still declassifying. But as far as like, where to take the investigation, who do you think we should talk to?' "And I'm like, 'You're really asking me? Of all... You're asking me who to go talk to? So I gave them a (audio cut out so I'll try my best) list of people that I've always wanted (to talk to) but they never really talked to me because they're all protected under their non-disclosure agreements and, you know, all of that kind of stuff." (If the White House wants any of those folks to talk to them, involve Trump, and/or Vance and Hegseth. That may convince them to risk it and start talking. And members of Congress need to do whatever they can to get protection, amnesty and anything else whistleblowers need to feel comfortable enough to come forward. Make it happen!) Burlison: "And so, I said, 'But I wanna...I wanna be, you gotta bring me in because I've been doing all of this work with no recognition, and so, if now, things are going to start getting real and real disclosure is gonna happen, I deserve to be a part of this.' And so, that's kind of where things are." (People may get on Burlison's case for being worried about recognition but can you blame him? He should be getting lots of praise, directly from Trump, IN PUBLIC (which will help his re-election efforts), and be given as much information as Rubio has in the National-Security-Advisor position. Maybe make Burlison and Grusch the co-UAP Czars?) Burlison: "And last night, we had about an hour and a half briefing with AARO, where we saw about 30 UAP videos. Some of them are incredible." (This is really encouraging but, as always, I wanna see some of these videos with my own eyes and see if any of them get the masses and media talking about this 24/7. That's when we'll know we're getting closer to more and more disclosure. But what about Disclosure, capital D? Meaning, will we learn about any alleged crashes, bodies, craft or analysis about intent and origin? I don't know.) Burlison: "And I'll describe the two of [the videos I saw]. One of them is of an object that is flying at a very aggressive speed, I don't know how fast. And then suddenly just instantaneously goes from whatever speed is flying... And my guess is it's flying with the wind, probably 80 miles an hour in the atmosphere, and then suddenly just goes like, Mach speed. I mean, it just instantly takes off." (Mach 1 = 767 mph. Again, we need to see this video to figure out if it's actually going as fast as Burlison claims. And if it's released, it would be nice to have data from more than one sensor.) Burlison: "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off. (This gives me hope that future videos will contain better footage. Just how much better? Stay tuned, I guess. I've heard things hyped privately in the past and they usually fall flat and don't get the attention of the masses when made public.) Burlison: "The other video was one of a submarine, I think it's a Russian sub that we're filming. And there are about three objects that are buzzing around this Russian sub that the camera operator - who's supposed to be watching the Russian sub - suddenly starts realizing, I've gotta be watching these objects." Kim St. Onge: "I love how passionate you are about UFOs, by the way, which is why we trust you with all our UFO updates." (They then proceeded to cut off his UFO talk and changed the subject. SMDFH!!! Hope we get to see lots more videos!)

Joe Murgia

54,993 views • 4 months ago

[UAP], "were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology." ~Luna (Note: Transcript is much longer than video clip below) 🤔 Luna: There Are No "Holy Shit" Videos That I've Seen That The Public Has Not 🤔 The 46 videos we requested, "have all now been declassified." ~Rep. Anna Paulina Luna "ALL 46 [videos] have not been released." ~Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell to Me (I'd like to get that clarified from Rep. Luna) "If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up at...you'd be up at night worrying about, or thinking about this stuff." ~Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office to Rob Finnerty And Burchett added that we'd, "come unglued." We also had this... "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Has that video been released?) Compare that to what Luna said... Douthat: "Is there anything else out there (video-wise) that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "As far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out." (So nothing to keep us up at night or to make us come unglued, or...make us gasp. I appreciate her being level headed with that and not hyping it. So, what are Burlison and Burchett talking about? I have learned to see things for myself first before getting too excited about what others say about x, y and z. Some of those videos in the two releases ARE very interesting but nothing has kept me up at night or made me gasp. Do videos like that even exist? It's not the first time I've asked that question.) ~~~Extended Transcript from Segment~~~ Douthat: "You have had access, before these videos were released. In what context have you seen these videos before they were released? Luna: "So I went into the SCIF and...I went and actually observed and saw all the videos before they were released to go through, numerically, to make sure that those were the ones that correlated to the ones that we had actually put out in the request. So those have all now been declassified." Douthat: "All of the ones?" Luna: "Yeah, in the list." (Remember: Regarding the list of 46, Corbell told me that, ""ALL 46 [videos] have not been released.") Douthat: "But how did you get the list of videos in the request?" Luna: "We had a group that came forward, it was bipartisan, former whistleblowers from the intelligence community that had access to... I would compare it to something like YouTube that exists within the intelligence community. And they came up with the files, and they said you need to get access to these files and have them released. And so, before the order came out from the President, we had come up with this list. We had been getting push back, and then after [Trump] gave the green light for it, it was declassified, and those are now up and able to be [viewed] at the Department if War." Douthat: "And what do you think they show?" Luna: "Well, there's some interesting stuff. I think that they show UAPs. There has been one of the videos that has since been debunked to be actually the infrared that was picking up aircraft that was farther in distance, but the optics are kind of an illusion in that sense. So there's been one that's been debunked. But there are ones that they cannot explain. They've tried to cross-reference it with other data, and the way that these things are maneuvering are pretty wild. And so, again, I think that they show UAPs in some instances." Douthat: "Right. And you think that one reason to take this stuff seriously is that they correlate with direct-pilot testimony of the kind that you've heard, right. So it's not like, I'm just... Imagine the completely skeptical listener or viewer, of which there are reasonably many, who says, 'Okay, you have some number of videos, we don't know what they are, but if one of them turns out to be sort of some prosaic explanation, we can assume a lot of them will be.' So what else makes you think..." Luna: "In the specific incident of Eglin Air Force Base, which is where we had the pilot testimony and we were able to see some images, these things were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology is getting completely fried." Douthat: "And this is something that pilots told you had happened to them? Luna: "Yes, yep. Now, the other issue is, sometimes pilots won't report because they don't want to be taken off flight status. So there's removing the stigma of if you're supposed to have safe flying. You want to also track national security issues. You have to be able to document this stuff. But when you have this type of stuff impacting military training, impacting flight operations, impacting our technology, it's a problem. "We should follow up, and then say, 'Okay, well, is this technology that, potentially, could be advanced tech from adversary nations? I don't, necessarily, think that's the case, because if that was true, we wouldn't be number one, currently. Some of this stuff that we're seeing is pretty wild. You saw the New York Times report (2017 and the Tic Tac ~Joe), and just how it's defying physics, if you will. But then the other aspect of, what can we as Congress do next? We can declassify. I don't think, you know, this aspect of people saying it's not enough..." Douthat: "Are there things that you've seen in a SCIF, or not in a SCIF, that are wilder than this (the videos that have already been released)? That would like, make the front page of the New York Times as, you know, no one can be skeptical anymore?" Luna: "No, I think the aspect of, do I have, you know, a location where there's a little green man on a slab in a fridge (laughs). I don't think I'm gonna get that (laughs)." Douthat: "Wait, we're gonna get to that. Just stick with the videos. Is there anything else out there that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "Well, I think that there's probably going to be some more release of other videos as well, other testimony. They're still combing. But, as far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out."
0:45

[UAP], "were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology." ~Luna (Note: Transcript is much longer than video clip below) 🤔 Luna: There Are No "Holy Shit" Videos That I've Seen That The Public Has Not 🤔 The 46 videos we requested, "have all now been declassified." ~Rep. Anna Paulina Luna "ALL 46 [videos] have not been released." ~Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell to Me (I'd like to get that clarified from Rep. Luna) "If they would release the things that I've seen, you would stay up at...you'd be up at night worrying about, or thinking about this stuff." ~Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office to Rob Finnerty And Burchett added that we'd, "come unglued." We also had this... "It was one of those moments where everyone in the room gasped. Everyone. Even the staffers who are like, the most skeptical people in the room just gasped when they saw that video. Because there's not a single aerial thing that can do something like that, that can pull that off." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (Has that video been released?) Compare that to what Luna said... Douthat: "Is there anything else out there (video-wise) that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "As far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out." (So nothing to keep us up at night or to make us come unglued, or...make us gasp. I appreciate her being level headed with that and not hyping it. So, what are Burlison and Burchett talking about? I have learned to see things for myself first before getting too excited about what others say about x, y and z. Some of those videos in the two releases ARE very interesting but nothing has kept me up at night or made me gasp. Do videos like that even exist? It's not the first time I've asked that question.) ~~~Extended Transcript from Segment~~~ Douthat: "You have had access, before these videos were released. In what context have you seen these videos before they were released? Luna: "So I went into the SCIF and...I went and actually observed and saw all the videos before they were released to go through, numerically, to make sure that those were the ones that correlated to the ones that we had actually put out in the request. So those have all now been declassified." Douthat: "All of the ones?" Luna: "Yeah, in the list." (Remember: Regarding the list of 46, Corbell told me that, ""ALL 46 [videos] have not been released.") Douthat: "But how did you get the list of videos in the request?" Luna: "We had a group that came forward, it was bipartisan, former whistleblowers from the intelligence community that had access to... I would compare it to something like YouTube that exists within the intelligence community. And they came up with the files, and they said you need to get access to these files and have them released. And so, before the order came out from the President, we had come up with this list. We had been getting push back, and then after [Trump] gave the green light for it, it was declassified, and those are now up and able to be [viewed] at the Department if War." Douthat: "And what do you think they show?" Luna: "Well, there's some interesting stuff. I think that they show UAPs. There has been one of the videos that has since been debunked to be actually the infrared that was picking up aircraft that was farther in distance, but the optics are kind of an illusion in that sense. So there's been one that's been debunked. But there are ones that they cannot explain. They've tried to cross-reference it with other data, and the way that these things are maneuvering are pretty wild. And so, again, I think that they show UAPs in some instances." Douthat: "Right. And you think that one reason to take this stuff seriously is that they correlate with direct-pilot testimony of the kind that you've heard, right. So it's not like, I'm just... Imagine the completely skeptical listener or viewer, of which there are reasonably many, who says, 'Okay, you have some number of videos, we don't know what they are, but if one of them turns out to be sort of some prosaic explanation, we can assume a lot of them will be.' So what else makes you think..." Luna: "In the specific incident of Eglin Air Force Base, which is where we had the pilot testimony and we were able to see some images, these things were frying the equipment on the aircraft. Some of our most state-of-the-art technology is getting completely fried." Douthat: "And this is something that pilots told you had happened to them? Luna: "Yes, yep. Now, the other issue is, sometimes pilots won't report because they don't want to be taken off flight status. So there's removing the stigma of if you're supposed to have safe flying. You want to also track national security issues. You have to be able to document this stuff. But when you have this type of stuff impacting military training, impacting flight operations, impacting our technology, it's a problem. "We should follow up, and then say, 'Okay, well, is this technology that, potentially, could be advanced tech from adversary nations? I don't, necessarily, think that's the case, because if that was true, we wouldn't be number one, currently. Some of this stuff that we're seeing is pretty wild. You saw the New York Times report (2017 and the Tic Tac ~Joe), and just how it's defying physics, if you will. But then the other aspect of, what can we as Congress do next? We can declassify. I don't think, you know, this aspect of people saying it's not enough..." Douthat: "Are there things that you've seen in a SCIF, or not in a SCIF, that are wilder than this (the videos that have already been released)? That would like, make the front page of the New York Times as, you know, no one can be skeptical anymore?" Luna: "No, I think the aspect of, do I have, you know, a location where there's a little green man on a slab in a fridge (laughs). I don't think I'm gonna get that (laughs)." Douthat: "Wait, we're gonna get to that. Just stick with the videos. Is there anything else out there that is like, a holy-shit moment?" Luna: "Well, I think that there's probably going to be some more release of other videos as well, other testimony. They're still combing. But, as far as a lot of the meat and potatoes that we've been able to see and gotten briefings on, it's, for the most part, been put out."

Joe Murgia

14,839 views • 3 months ago