Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Diplomacy failed. Sanctions aren’t enough. Trump is at a breaking point with Iran—and a return to major combat may be days away. Are we on the brink of an unavoidable conflict, or is this all leverage?

Watcher Reports

12,107 subscribers

15,103 views • 4 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 THIS IS INTERESTING 🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST SAID A DEAL WITH IRAN IS 2 OR 3 DAYS AWAY. MARCH: "2 OR 3 DAYS AWAY." APRIL: "2 OR 3 DAYS AWAY." MAY: "2 OR 3 DAYS AWAY." JUNE: "2 OR 3 DAYS AWAY." WILL WE GET A DEAL THIS TIME?

🚨 THIS IS INTERESTING 🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST SAID A DEAL WITH IRAN IS 2 OR 3 DAYS AWAY. MARCH: "2 OR 3 DAYS AWAY." APRIL: "2 OR 3 DAYS AWAY." MAY: "2 OR 3 DAYS AWAY." JUNE: "2 OR 3 DAYS AWAY." WILL WE GET A DEAL THIS TIME?

Money Ape

11,982 views • 1 month ago

Bessent: There is no trade deal with India, they were late. Trump keeps all options open on sanctions and tariffs to stop the war in Russia. He is a president of peace who wants this conflict ended. China tariffs could be on the table at some point. 1/

Bessent: There is no trade deal with India, they were late. Trump keeps all options open on sanctions and tariffs to stop the war in Russia. He is a president of peace who wants this conflict ended. China tariffs could be on the table at some point. 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

83,132 views • 1 year ago

A ceasefire may have paused fighting — but not the crisis. In Iran, rising prices, a volatile currency, and years of sanctions are pushing daily life to the brink, with many fearing the economic pain will outlast the conflict.

A ceasefire may have paused fighting — but not the crisis. In Iran, rising prices, a volatile currency, and years of sanctions are pushing daily life to the brink, with many fearing the economic pain will outlast the conflict.

Al Jazeera English

77,028 views • 3 months ago

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 A power plant or a bridge for every tanker hit, that's the formula turning this into a regional energy war. Alex Christoforou breaks down how the conflict escalated into an energy war in all but name, with the Strait of Hormuz as the ultimate pressure point: "Iran understands this, and the last thing that Iran wants to have happen is a long, drawn out conflict, which is why they're going to hold on to the big leverage." Control of Hormuz is the whole game. Everything else is noise. Alex Christoforou

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 A power plant or a bridge for every tanker hit, that's the formula turning this into a regional energy war. Alex Christoforou breaks down how the conflict escalated into an energy war in all but name, with the Strait of Hormuz as the ultimate pressure point: "Iran understands this, and the last thing that Iran wants to have happen is a long, drawn out conflict, which is why they're going to hold on to the big leverage." Control of Hormuz is the whole game. Everything else is noise. Alex Christoforou

Mario Nawfal

90,018 views • 11 days ago

🚨 BREAKING 🇺🇸 TRUMP IS CONSIDERING A MASSIVE ATTACK ON IRAN, LARGER THAN ANY PREVIOUS STRIKE. “I AM CLOSE TO MAKING A DECISION,” TRUMP TOLD CHANNEL 12. THIS IS MAJOR ESCALATION IN THE U.S.-IRAN CONFLICT. THIS IS EXTREMELY BAD FOR MARKETS...

🚨 BREAKING 🇺🇸 TRUMP IS CONSIDERING A MASSIVE ATTACK ON IRAN, LARGER THAN ANY PREVIOUS STRIKE. “I AM CLOSE TO MAKING A DECISION,” TRUMP TOLD CHANNEL 12. THIS IS MAJOR ESCALATION IN THE U.S.-IRAN CONFLICT. THIS IS EXTREMELY BAD FOR MARKETS...

Wimar.X

48,588 views • 11 days ago

BREAKING:🚨 MIDDLE EAST ON THE BRINK: IRAN THREATENS MASS MISSILE STRIKE Negotiations with Iran have collapsed — and the warnings are escalating fast. According to CNN, Iranian officials are signaling they are prepared to respond to any U.S. strike by launching up to 500 Khyber ballistic missiles at Israel. The Khyber missile is no symbolic threat: • 2,000 km range • 1.5-ton warhead • Believed to support multiple or split warheads This is not posturing. This is deterrence by terror. With diplomacy dead, red lines crossed, and military assets already in position, the region is now sitting on a hair-trigger. One miscalculation — one strike — could ignite a conflict far beyond Israel and Iran. The world is inching closer to a moment it may not be able to walk back from.

BREAKING:🚨 MIDDLE EAST ON THE BRINK: IRAN THREATENS MASS MISSILE STRIKE Negotiations with Iran have collapsed — and the warnings are escalating fast. According to CNN, Iranian officials are signaling they are prepared to respond to any U.S. strike by launching up to 500 Khyber ballistic missiles at Israel. The Khyber missile is no symbolic threat: • 2,000 km range • 1.5-ton warhead • Believed to support multiple or split warheads This is not posturing. This is deterrence by terror. With diplomacy dead, red lines crossed, and military assets already in position, the region is now sitting on a hair-trigger. One miscalculation — one strike — could ignite a conflict far beyond Israel and Iran. The world is inching closer to a moment it may not be able to walk back from.

Jim Ferguson

182,015 views • 5 months ago

Sen. Fetterman says Iran is an “evil regime,” calling out silence on human rights abuses and urging firm action to ensure Tehran never gets a nuclear weapon: “I’m firmly on the side of Israel. I’m firmly on the side of reminding people that Iran is an evil regime. And why are we the only ones talking about the Iranian women who are about to be hanged? Why aren’t people on the left talking about that? Why aren’t they protesting that Iran is about to execute women? They are an evil regime. This has been a 47-year-long problem, and here we are, just over 47 days into this phase, at a very important inflection point in the Middle East. That’s why I’m going to continue to support this, because Iran can never acquire a nuclear bomb. That’s not a radical idea for the Democratic Party . We should be firmly on the side of holding Iran fully accountable.”

Sen. Fetterman says Iran is an “evil regime,” calling out silence on human rights abuses and urging firm action to ensure Tehran never gets a nuclear weapon: “I’m firmly on the side of Israel. I’m firmly on the side of reminding people that Iran is an evil regime. And why are we the only ones talking about the Iranian women who are about to be hanged? Why aren’t people on the left talking about that? Why aren’t they protesting that Iran is about to execute women? They are an evil regime. This has been a 47-year-long problem, and here we are, just over 47 days into this phase, at a very important inflection point in the Middle East. That’s why I’m going to continue to support this, because Iran can never acquire a nuclear bomb. That’s not a radical idea for the Democratic Party . We should be firmly on the side of holding Iran fully accountable.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

75,090 views • 3 months ago

Trump is once again signaling openness to diplomacy with Iran, telling reporters that: "I think Iran will come along... I'd love to take the sanctions off when they're ready to talk. They can't really survive with those sanctions — those sanctions are very tough." This is how he sounded in January and February—yet he still greenlit Israel’s attack on Iran and later bombed Iran himself. Tehran is now wary that talk of diplomacy may simply be a façade meant to lull it into a false sense of security before another strike. Trump may genuinely seek diplomacy, but convincing Tehran of that will be far harder given his perceived duplicity in May and June. Still, Iran has few good options. Rejecting diplomacy won’t improve its situation; it would only invite harsher sanctions and possibly another round of bombing. Even if diplomacy is a trap, refusing to engage directly does nothing to expand Tehran’s options. Direct talks may carry risks, but they at least offer a faint chance of a mutually acceptable exit—something total disengagement cannot provide. One thing remains unchanged, though: if Trump defines diplomacy as Iranian capitulation, it will neither succeed nor qualify as diplomacy—or even as a “deal.” A deal is possible; in fact, there nearly was one in May and June. But Trump abandoned his original “no nukes” red line in favor of Israel’s “no enrichment” stance—an escalation that predictably, and intentionally, steered events toward war. If Trump truly wants a deal rather than confrontation, he must reject Netanyahu’s red line and return to his own. Iran, for its part, should drop its resistance to direct talks. A direct and active channel between Trump and Pezeshkian is essential. Tehran made a major strategic error earlier this year by refusing to speak with Trump directly. That silence left Netanyahu and his allies in Washington dominating Trump’s ear, while Tehran limited itself to indirect communication through Witkoff. One final point: In 1991, the U.S. convened much of the Middle East for the Madrid Conference, which paved the way for the Oslo process and a new regional order. Iran was not invited—much to Tehran’s frustration, as it was then seeking improved relations with Washington and its regional neighbors. The U.S. chose instead a strategy to stabilize the region by isolating Iran, a policy that pushed Tehran into the role of spoiler Today, Trump is openly calling for Iran to be included. What an irony - and mistake - if Tehran dismisses that out of hand.

Trump is once again signaling openness to diplomacy with Iran, telling reporters that: "I think Iran will come along... I'd love to take the sanctions off when they're ready to talk. They can't really survive with those sanctions — those sanctions are very tough." This is how he sounded in January and February—yet he still greenlit Israel’s attack on Iran and later bombed Iran himself. Tehran is now wary that talk of diplomacy may simply be a façade meant to lull it into a false sense of security before another strike. Trump may genuinely seek diplomacy, but convincing Tehran of that will be far harder given his perceived duplicity in May and June. Still, Iran has few good options. Rejecting diplomacy won’t improve its situation; it would only invite harsher sanctions and possibly another round of bombing. Even if diplomacy is a trap, refusing to engage directly does nothing to expand Tehran’s options. Direct talks may carry risks, but they at least offer a faint chance of a mutually acceptable exit—something total disengagement cannot provide. One thing remains unchanged, though: if Trump defines diplomacy as Iranian capitulation, it will neither succeed nor qualify as diplomacy—or even as a “deal.” A deal is possible; in fact, there nearly was one in May and June. But Trump abandoned his original “no nukes” red line in favor of Israel’s “no enrichment” stance—an escalation that predictably, and intentionally, steered events toward war. If Trump truly wants a deal rather than confrontation, he must reject Netanyahu’s red line and return to his own. Iran, for its part, should drop its resistance to direct talks. A direct and active channel between Trump and Pezeshkian is essential. Tehran made a major strategic error earlier this year by refusing to speak with Trump directly. That silence left Netanyahu and his allies in Washington dominating Trump’s ear, while Tehran limited itself to indirect communication through Witkoff. One final point: In 1991, the U.S. convened much of the Middle East for the Madrid Conference, which paved the way for the Oslo process and a new regional order. Iran was not invited—much to Tehran’s frustration, as it was then seeking improved relations with Washington and its regional neighbors. The U.S. chose instead a strategy to stabilize the region by isolating Iran, a policy that pushed Tehran into the role of spoiler Today, Trump is openly calling for Iran to be included. What an irony - and mistake - if Tehran dismisses that out of hand.

Trita Parsi

39,871 views • 9 months ago

🚨 Iran is walking on thin ice. High-level talks between the U.S. and Iran are resuming in Qatar, but President Trump has already made America’s position unmistakably clear: Iran will never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. At the same time, reports indicate Israel has instructed its military to be prepared to act independently if diplomacy fails. The next few days could determine whether this ends with a deal or with another major escalation in the Middle East.

🚨 Iran is walking on thin ice. High-level talks between the U.S. and Iran are resuming in Qatar, but President Trump has already made America’s position unmistakably clear: Iran will never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. At the same time, reports indicate Israel has instructed its military to be prepared to act independently if diplomacy fails. The next few days could determine whether this ends with a deal or with another major escalation in the Middle East.

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

68,546 views • 1 month ago

The current situation in Iran is either a return to the status quo of 120 days ago, or an attempt to re-establish the Obama-Iran deal made over a decade ago. So WTF was the point of this war again?

The current situation in Iran is either a return to the status quo of 120 days ago, or an attempt to re-establish the Obama-Iran deal made over a decade ago. So WTF was the point of this war again?

VoteVets

10,925 views • 3 months ago

They still don't get it. President Trump is right to keep his options open on Iran. His judgment on this is impeccable so far and we are on the brink of an outbreak of peace in the region.

They still don't get it. President Trump is right to keep his options open on Iran. His judgment on this is impeccable so far and we are on the brink of an outbreak of peace in the region.

Scott Jennings

167,337 views • 1 year ago

Hasan Piker on Trump / Iran: “We are led by a fucking moron. A baboon with a child’s brain. We are losing the war, we are losing the battle. At this point, this is not about coming to a peaceable conclusion, a managed resolution, this is just about stopping the bleeding”

Hasan Piker on Trump / Iran: “We are led by a fucking moron. A baboon with a child’s brain. We are losing the war, we are losing the battle. At this point, this is not about coming to a peaceable conclusion, a managed resolution, this is just about stopping the bleeding”

Marco Foster

18,593 views • 17 days ago

🚨 TRUMP: IRAN DEAL COULD BE DAYS AWAY PRESIDENT TRUMP SAYS THERE IS A “VERY GOOD CHANCE” OF REACHING A DEAL WITH IRAN IN THE NEXT TWO OR THREE DAYS “WE’RE VERY CLOSE.” WHAT HAPPENS TO OIL IF A DEAL GETS DONE?

🚨 TRUMP: IRAN DEAL COULD BE DAYS AWAY PRESIDENT TRUMP SAYS THERE IS A “VERY GOOD CHANCE” OF REACHING A DEAL WITH IRAN IN THE NEXT TWO OR THREE DAYS “WE’RE VERY CLOSE.” WHAT HAPPENS TO OIL IF A DEAL GETS DONE?

Money Ape

25,532 views • 1 month ago

⚡️BREAKING: Trump may impose “hellish” sanctions against Russia in memory of Lindsey Graham — Will you sign the sanctions bill against Russia? — Lindsey Graham really wanted this. It is possible that Iran and Hezbollah will also be added to it. There is a high probability that this will be done.

⚡️BREAKING: Trump may impose “hellish” sanctions against Russia in memory of Lindsey Graham — Will you sign the sanctions bill against Russia? — Lindsey Graham really wanted this. It is possible that Iran and Hezbollah will also be added to it. There is a high probability that this will be done.

NEXTA

170,531 views • 20 days ago

Cuba is facing blackouts, protests, and a collapsing economy—and the Trump administration is turning up the pressure. After reinstating Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism and cutting key oil supplies, Washington may be pushing the communist regime toward a breaking point. With Havana also deepening ties to Iran and terrorist groups, could Cuba be the next major regime change target?

Cuba is facing blackouts, protests, and a collapsing economy—and the Trump administration is turning up the pressure. After reinstating Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism and cutting key oil supplies, Washington may be pushing the communist regime toward a breaking point. With Havana also deepening ties to Iran and terrorist groups, could Cuba be the next major regime change target?

America Uncovered

11,637 views • 4 months ago

Trump “Betrayed & destroyed diplomacy” — Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal and International Affairs of Iran Kazem Gharibabadi. Tehran agrees to talks with the US and gets BOMBED mid-negotiation. For the SECOND time in months. How do you negotiate again when good faith is answered with airstrikes? Is there a way back — or is this the point of no return? Full breakdown on The Sanchez Effect.

Trump “Betrayed & destroyed diplomacy” — Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal and International Affairs of Iran Kazem Gharibabadi. Tehran agrees to talks with the US and gets BOMBED mid-negotiation. For the SECOND time in months. How do you negotiate again when good faith is answered with airstrikes? Is there a way back — or is this the point of no return? Full breakdown on The Sanchez Effect.

Rick Sanchez

41,249 views • 5 months ago

What we know about how the president is handling things with the regime and Iran is troubling enough… What is much more troubling is what we don't know about where all these billions of dollars from Arabs is going and what are they getting for it in return? This level of in your face conflict is unheard of:

What we know about how the president is handling things with the regime and Iran is troubling enough… What is much more troubling is what we don't know about where all these billions of dollars from Arabs is going and what are they getting for it in return? This level of in your face conflict is unheard of:

Christopher C. Cuomo

16,813 views • 19 days ago

🎙️🔊 "The Gulf states are realizing that there is no return to a region ex ante, pre-28th February. They don't want to be left with an emboldened Iran capable and confident enough to use their leverage of shipping and energy markets. Equally, there is little they can add by joining Israel's War on Iran. They are prisoners of geography, having to find a way to co-exist with Iran. Ultimately, it will be some form of diplomatic agreement that gets them out of this quagmire"

🎙️🔊 "The Gulf states are realizing that there is no return to a region ex ante, pre-28th February. They don't want to be left with an emboldened Iran capable and confident enough to use their leverage of shipping and energy markets. Equally, there is little they can add by joining Israel's War on Iran. They are prisoners of geography, having to find a way to co-exist with Iran. Ultimately, it will be some form of diplomatic agreement that gets them out of this quagmire"

Dr Andreas Krieg

16,508 views • 4 months ago

The UK is finished. We have passed the point of no return. We need a Donald Trump right away.

The UK is finished. We have passed the point of no return. We need a Donald Trump right away.

Gitmo (Health is a Wealth) 🇺🇸🇮🇱

14,082 views • 1 month ago